3.9

Alex Bielajew

Nuclear Engineering - University of Michigan

3.9
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
156
Reviews
3.9
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
3.9
Helpful
3.8
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

156

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
156 total ratings

5

69

4

49

3

21

2

15

1

2

What Students Say

really wasn't made to be an engr 101 professor

ENGR101 - 2.0 rating

The grading was lenient though

NERS311 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

97%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
A- (2)
A (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 4 reported grades
A-: 2
A: 1
A+: 1
Common Tags
Lots of homework (1)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.25 avg change
Dec
Jan
Feb
Apr
Feb
May
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENGINEERING101

5.0

(1)

NERS250

5.0

(1)

NERS312

4.5

(4)

ENGR101

4.1

(98)

ENG101

4.1

(39)
+4 more courses
Difficulty by Course

NERS311

4.3

NERS312

4.3

ENGN101

4.0

NERS250

3.0

ENG101

2.8

Reviews (155)
4.0
3.0
ENG101
Sep 23, 2003

Great teacher, good sense of humor about subject.

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Nov 19, 2003

No Comments

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Nov 27, 2003

He is a funny guy. The assignments and syntax is very simple, however the exams are not. They force you to think extremly quickly -- class avg is usually around 60. I write programs 10x more complex for the Xbox with C++, but most likely will get a B.

5.0
2.0
ENG101
Nov 30, 2003

He is an good teacher and funny as well. lectures are fun and easy to follow and he is very good about answering question.

5.0
2.0
ENGIN101
Dec 4, 2003

His tests are pretty hard for me to get done in time, but other than that he's a fun lecturer. Explains everything clearly, and doesn't take it too seriously.

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Dec 10, 2003

He is a great instructor. The lectures are entertaining and very very clear. The tests are SUPER HARD, though. Mostly, there is just not enough time to complete them correctly. Assignments are usually fun and not too hard for the time given.

5.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 10, 2003

Lots of examples used in class. Fun and interesting lecture atmosphere. Time alloted for exams is a bit short so make sure you know your material (read the darn book). Assignments are pretty simple, and prepare you for the quizzes and exams.

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Dec 10, 2003

fun class, assignments were interesting to work on

5.0
4.0
ENG101
Dec 11, 2003

No Comments

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 12, 2003

very good, funny

4.0
4.0
ENGN101
Dec 13, 2003

It's obvious he knows what he's doing, and that he actually likes teaching it! He's very kind, but he won't spoon-feed you a good grade. If you want that, you're in the wrong college at U of M.

2.0
4.0
ENG101
Mar 28, 2004

I may be the first person to say something negative about the guy. But, I hated his lecture, everyone that I know thought it was pointless. I went to his office hours and I felt as if he didn't want us there and like we were wasting his precious time.

5.0
2.0
ENG101
Apr 7, 2004

Very clear with easy well defined assignments.

4.0
3.0
ENG101
Apr 25, 2004

good at lectures and knows when to lighten the stress from learning by telling a quick joke or two.

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Aug 11, 2004

Made a boring subject entertaining. Very good at answering questions, both in office hours and in lecture. His final wasn't killer, either.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 10, 2004

He tries realy hard to tell jokes, but they aren't that funny, but he is still a pretty good teacher. He gives many examples in lecture and explains things fairly well, however he only goes over things once so make sure you take note of it and write it down during lecture.

3.0
4.0
ENG100
Dec 17, 2004

The time allotted on tests is really short so make sure to write comments so the graders know at least what you were thinking of doing. The lectures are hard to follow sometimes. Read the book and do the problems at the end of the chapters (especially for the final!).

5.0
4.0
ENG101
Jan 5, 2005

I thought he was a really good teacher, of course I am strange and like programming. I do have to say that even when I didn't understand what was going on I still enjoyed the class. It was the only class this term that I wanted to go to. Also you could tell that he really enjoyed teaching.

5.0
1.0
ENG101
Apr 6, 2005

Very easy class. Some of the topics he deems important do take too much time (we spent 3 weeks on binary and hex, something that could be taught in a day). Funny guy, and challenges everyone with the homework. Very charismatic.

5.0
3.0
ENG101
May 24, 2005

He rocked, he told stories and jokes to keep the class paying attention. He was good at explaining things and his assignments were clear

4.0
1.0
ENGR101
May 26, 2005

very easy class and exams, explains some of the material unclearly in lecture, so you have to depend on the GSI's to make everything clearer for those topics. But he does give great hints before every exam and tends to take exam problems from questions in the book (which is online, you don't have to buy it!).

2.0
3.0
ENG101
Aug 9, 2005

No Comments

5.0
2.0
ENG101
Sep 18, 2005

he was so entertaining! and explained well

5.0
2.0
ENGINEERING101
Sep 24, 2005

No Comments

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Nov 14, 2005

He makes this class fun. I especially enjoyed the stories about his own life. They make you want to pay attention!

2.0
3.0
ENG101
Nov 21, 2005

this class sucked

5.0
5.0
ENG101
Nov 28, 2005

My favorite professor. He is tremendous. He makes the class interesting and fun. However, it is very difficult material.

5.0
2.0
ENG101
Dec 5, 2005

Bielajew is an amazing lecturer. Part of what drives him is his ecstatic interest in all things computer science. He's not only willing to answer questions, but also to stop class completely to make sure every single doubt is cleared. His classes are very open and comfortable, and his lesson plans are dynamic enough to support time for interaction.

4.0
4.0
NERS311
Dec 10, 2005

First time teaching the class, and he did a pretty good job adapting to the needs of the students. His lecture style follows the text or a set of auxiliary notes that he will distribute. The material isn't easy, and you will have to work with classmates to do allot of the work. Always open to improving the course.

3.0
4.0
ENGR101
Dec 16, 2005

He is really smart so he cannot convey the info to minlings like me.

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Dec 18, 2005

His class was my favorite class this semester. It was easy at times, hard at times, overall a neutral class with regards to difficulty. As a professor, he has a hard time answering questions, and usually goes off on tangents unrelated to the questions, but in the end, the questions are resolved and everyone is happy. Great Professor, great class

5.0
1.0
ENG101
Dec 19, 2005

If Bielajew's teaching 101, TAKE IT WITH HIM. He's nice, easy, and you learn a lot. I had no programming experience, but after taking 101 w/him, I feel very comfortable with C++ and Matlab. Assignment instructions & help were clear and not too hard, and exams were on par w/the assignments. He goes on tangents a lot in class, but that's just funny.

4.0
1.0
ENG101
Jan 10, 2006

this is the eng101 prof you want. TRUST ME. i'm so tired of listening to people complain about their eng101 profs. to avoid me pain in the future, please take eng101 with bielajew. you will have nothing to complain about, and we will get along just fine.

1.0
5.0
ENG101
Jan 19, 2006

Many people think he is the best 101 prof, but if you don't have previous experience with computers and don't figure things out about computers really quickly on your own, it is a pretty tough class.

5.0
1.0
ENG100
May 26, 2006

All exam quesltions are 'exacty the same' as the practice problems in his textbook without changing a single word. So many extra credits for assignments-a number of people got above 100 in the end. He truly loves this course and his students. But, redeem before choosing him because you might be addicted to computer programming.

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Nov 25, 2006

Prof Bielajew is a fantastic professor. He's funny and witty and never makes the class boring. He energises all of us, even though his class is after lunch and everyone just wants to fall asleep. A pity he's not teaching ENG 101 anymore...

4.0
1.0
ENG101
Apr 6, 2007

Prof Bielajew is a great professor! He teaches well, his exams are extrememly straightfoward (from the notes or the quizes he gives) and he keeps me awake in class. He is fairly funny, though not outrageously...

2.0
3.0
ENGIN101
Apr 10, 2007

his lectures are useless and I learn more from reading his online "book," which is a compilation of his lecture notes. go to your gsi-led discussions, it's where you will learn everything. quality of his lectures declined as semesster progressed. he doesn't really teach much programming in them and its irritating.

2.0
4.0
ENGR101
Apr 12, 2007

Needs to explain things instead of glossing everything over and expecting us to learn it. His lectures did indeed decline in quality as the semester went on.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Apr 13, 2007

Overall, a very high quality lecturer. He makes a valid attempt to connect to the class, and in all, his lectures are worth attending.

2.0
3.0
ENG101
Apr 13, 2007

Completely useless lectures. He thinks he is hilarious but none of his jokes are funny. If I didn't live on NC I'd never come to his lectures

3.0
2.0
ENGR101
Apr 24, 2007

Sometimes i really don't know what he is teaching, so does my GSI. It's extremely helpful to attend lab session. The GSI will clarify them for you.

3.0
2.0
ENGR101
May 1, 2007

This class is really easy if you can understand programming at all. But, his lectures are boring and pointless, just go to lab and you'll do fine.

3.0
2.0
ENGR101
May 8, 2007

I have never had so much trouble staying awake! Some of the things he says in lecture are completely irrelevant. Just be sure to go to lab, because that's where the learning really occurs.

2.0
5.0
ENG101
May 16, 2007

He does not teach and is not helpful. He is also foreign so make sure you clarify wording issues on assignments. Coding takes time and his written exams are very difficult. Take it from someone else

3.0
2.0
ENG101
Jun 13, 2007

I thought this class was pretty easy, and I had no previous programming experience. Bielajew thinks rather highly of himself and loves to waste time talking about things you DO NOT need to know. Basically use his website & the book to keep up with what he is supposedly teaching(or if you must go to class you can sleep) and go to labs.

5.0
1.0
ENG101
Jun 14, 2007

He was a great teacher. However, he went off topic a lot and didn't always remember that this class is INTRO to programming (meaning he forget some of us had had NO programming before). Lectures were useful, though towards the end, it got harder to see why...until you got to the exam. Exams were SUPER straightfoward and if you read the notes u win

4.0
2.0
ENG101
Sep 14, 2007

He is fun in class, but serious after class. Even one who has no programming experience can catch up. After all, I like his class.

3.0
3.0
ENGIN101
Nov 8, 2007

Kind of unpredictable, apparently he had some personal issues during the year and took it all out on his students. one day he spent half an hour telling us about a girl he used to date 30 years ago, instead of teaching. Also not a very nice guy when you go to his office hours, or ask him questions.

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Nov 11, 2007

He's hilarious! Plues he has taught this class over 3000 times and he can count the people who have failed it on his fingers and toes! He teaches programming in a weird way. He won't so much teach you programming language as much as teach you how computers think. It's very interesting and I would have a hard time falling asleep in his class.

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Nov 12, 2007

Funny guy. Lectures can be pointless, but once in a while he'll throw something at you that will be on the exam that's not in the book so it forces you to go. He takes a lot of time teaching you how things work in memory, which you don't need to know, in addition to just straight code. That's when you zone out. I would recomend him for 101.

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 2, 2007

Keeps it entertaining.

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Dec 6, 2007

I think a great thing for the college of Engineering is that instead of using their worst and most boring profs for intro classes they introduce you to guys like prof. Bielajew. He brings in some really cool info from his specialty and is a charismatic guy. Basically he makes a class that could be taught in a day the most interesting it could be.

4.0
2.0
ENG101
Dec 7, 2007

Bielajew was a good professor who knows what he's talking about, but his lectures can be pointless sometimes and not relative to the work you will be doing. He enjoys showing you quirks of computer programming and possible ways to break a program. GSI discussion clarifies everything he doesn't touch on. Easy class with previous experience.

4.0
4.0
ENG101
Dec 11, 2007

It was an okay experience. His presentations are fantastic and clear to understand, I would reccomend newcomers to attend this lecture

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Jan 4, 2008

Excellent class. The professor explains material well and makes class interesting & lively. It isn't too hard, but sometimes it involves a lot of work. He doesn't spend much time on MATLAB, but he does a great job with C++. And the class is less focused on theoretical concepts of programming as it is on algorithms & basic syntax.

5.0
5.0
ENG101
Mar 8, 2008

I hated programming but he was a cool professor

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Mar 12, 2008

Lectures were somewhat entertaining and quite useful. Lab was a very important part of class.

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Jun 4, 2008

Very good professor. His lectures are very clear and relevant to the projects you're doing. He also jokes and does random things during lecture which keep you awake and tuned in. He is very knowledgeable of the field. He starts the lecture with questions on anything related to computers, and answers every question. Definitely recommend him.

4.0
3.0
ENG101
Dec 2, 2008

Entertaining to listen. Explains material well. Don't get discouraged if you don't understand him sometimes...he really goes under the hood of what is happening, which you really don't need to know.

4.0
5.0
NERS311
Jan 25, 2009

Very clear prof.

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Jun 16, 2009

Good prof. First programming class I took, and I didn't have a problem with it. I found his lectures to be quite clear, and I liked the (free!) book he taught from. Homeworks and programming assignments weren't too difficult. I even skipped a bunch of lectures and still came out with a good grade.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 8, 2009

pretty good, seemed to like to tell why computers are "falable". just be sure to pay attention when he writes code, and understand the concept behind his explanations.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Jan 7, 2010

Pretty good teacher, added humor during lecture which added interest. However, there were many lectures that were not of any use for exams or assignments.

2.0
4.0
ENGR101
Mar 22, 2010

Very arrogant, not good at explaining course topics, many students in the past have said he is easy, however he completely changed the layout and design of his exams that make it near impossible to do well on

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Apr 6, 2010

Decent prof overall. Knows programming in and out and uses good examples. Class can get fairly boring though.

5.0
4.0
ENGR101
Apr 11, 2010

Bielajew is the easiest of the ENGR101 profs, and by far the most amusing. If you're looking to take this class while doing the least amount of work (and with a funny prof!), Bielajew's class is the one you want (PS. It's pronounced B. L. I. F.)

2.0
4.0
ENGR101
Apr 15, 2010

he knows programming pretty well but is terrible at teaching, his exams were super hard, the GSIs were the best resource to go to for help.

5.0
3.0
ENGR101
Apr 18, 2010

Bielajew is nice, helpful, and funny.

5.0
5.0
NERS312
Apr 19, 2010

Great Professor. The material is very challenging but you'll actually learn it with him. Exams are tough but he prepares you for them. Expect to work in this class but thanks to Prof. Bieljew you will learn a lot. Unlike 311 the textbook is actually used in 312 but his notes are often more helpful

5.0
4.0
ENGR101
Apr 19, 2010

Overall he is a very good teacher. He is a little odd sometimes and cracks really corny jokes, but he is pretty good at keeping you interested usually. My only complaint is that he sometimes spends too much time on algorithm design and neglects syntax. Overall though, he is a good teacher. Exams are not too hard if you study and attend class.

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Apr 27, 2010

I was told to take 101 with him because he was easiest -- however, after having 2 exams with averages of 71 and 69, I was wondering if people mislead me to take him. He made the final much easier, which I think was a fair way to help balance out grades. Assignments were not too hard, however lab seemed like a waste of time to be honest.

5.0
4.0
ENGR101
Apr 27, 2010

One of the best professors I have ever had. This guy brings all his wit to his lectures and keeps you entertained throughout. Projects are not hard, usually fun, and are relative to the exams. READ HIS BOOK!

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Apr 27, 2010

GREAT professor.Never took programming before pretty sure i was going to hate it but i actually LOVE IT now. He is funny, makes lecture really interesting, with a lot of extremely interesting and helpful examples. The assignments are not bad, some of them are really easy and fun. For exams however, better know the stuff well! READ HIS BOOK!!!

5.0
3.0
ENGR101
Apr 29, 2010

Great Professor. Stresses creativity and applications. Wish lab could be more useful, but turned out to just be a time to work on projects... almost nobody listens to the GSI but are rather stuck in their own "computer world". I wasn't sure whether I was going to take another class on Matlab before, but now I'm certain that I will. =)

4.0
4.0
NERS312
May 2, 2010

Very tough and difficult Professor, but has a great deal of respect for students. Enjoys teaching so much that he doesn't do much research any more to devote more time to his lectures.

4.0
4.0
NERS312
May 2, 2010

Excellent professor- truly excited by what he teaches and wants students to understand. Difficulty and amount of material makes this class difficult, but Professor Bielajew handles it very well.

2.0
2.0
ENGR101
May 5, 2010

Good and sometimes funny professor but him to come across as a bit egotistical. Goes over numerous examples in class and shows how things work. Projects are easy, but exams tend to hurt for some people. Writing C++ programs is like writing English essays - it takes practice to get to know it well.

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
May 6, 2010

Amusing, a bit eccentric, but very excited by what he teaches. Wants the students to learn and understand the material. Computer programing is very logic based. If you can think like a computer, this course should be a cakewalk. If you have difficulty understanding logic, it may be tougher, but the professor does a great job explaining it all.

3.0
4.0
ENGR101
Jun 25, 2010

Knows his material, if you don't already know a little programming, class will be tough. Hard exams. GSIs can be useful or useless (mine was useless). Confusing material if you aren't an EECS major.

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2010

Professor B is so passionate about his teaching. The projects he assigned throughout the semester were so fun! I came into Engr 101 having absolutely no programming experience whatsoever, and the class was scary at first, but it has turned out to be my fav. class. Definitely go to a GSI's office hours whenever you need help with anything.

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 9, 2010

Great teacher who truly cares about his students. He loves the material and makes it interesting. Before this class I had a slight interest in computer programming. Now I find that I like it a lot more. Instead of focusing on mundane syntax he focuses on the bigger picture.

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 9, 2010

He's a great professor that knows his programming. He knows a lot of the theory behind it and pushes to teach that to the students, so programming makes more sense.

5.0
2.0
ENG101
Dec 11, 2010

Overall, Prof. B is a pretty good instructor. He's pretty funny at times, and although lecture can be boring, it's quite instructive. Lab is where most of the practice is done, but the examples he does in class are helpful. Lots of questions from his online book and assignments show up word for word on exams, so make sure you study this stuff!

3.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 11, 2010

His lectures do not really help that much. He knows a lot about programming but does not explain well enough for novices to understand and follow

3.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 11, 2010

Smart guy, pretty entertaining, clearly knows a lot about the subject and is passionate about it. Would be nice if he actually taught it so students can learn the material. The only text used is a compellation of notes/programs written by the prof.

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 12, 2010

Good professor. Exams follow a pattern so figure that out. His assignments are more to make you think than doing long lines of code like other classes do. Also he makes the subject interesting (and it certainly isn't always interesting).

5.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 14, 2010

Came into the class knowing absolutely nothing, left with a wealth of programming knowledge. Bielajew is a great professor and really knows the subject matter. Keeps lectures interesting by showing practical applications or funny and silly programs. The HWs can be tricky but there's a lot of help from GSIs. Exams aren't too bad either. Great class.

4.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 16, 2010

He is one of the better profs I have had so far, the course doesnt allow for much useful teaching, the majority of learning will be done in lab+assignments, Its different from other sections but its much easier, exams aren't that hard as long as you understand the quiz 101 is a hard class in general so be ready to work, take his class over others!

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Jan 5, 2011

Very good teacher. Provided that I was a novice programmer I pretty much enjoyed his classes and learned quite a lot about programming.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Jan 5, 2011

Good teacher. Kept it interesting.

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Apr 17, 2012

Kept lecture very interesting with humor

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Apr 17, 2012

very helpful and nice, pretty easy if you just do your work and put in some amount of time. much easier than other engr101 classes

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Apr 17, 2012

The professor kept the info interesting and kept everyone awake with breaks and cheesy humor. And Excellent prof.

3.0
1.0
ENGR101
Apr 17, 2012

I didn't learn well from his lecture style. The labs helped me learn the most because you really have to work with code yourself rather than watching someone else manipulate code. Go to lecture though, he teaches you what he wants you to know for the exams

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Apr 17, 2012

Good class. Would answer any question. Very helpful. Korny jokes. Never keeps you late. From what i hear: best of the 101 professors. Assignments are originally boring but definitely get interesting.

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Apr 18, 2012

I recommend you have a little bit or java or c++ experience - you're expected to figure amd find out some coding things on your own. Much of class time is dedicated to running and analyzing programs rather than covering the basics of typing code.

2.0
2.0
ENGR101
May 11, 2012

If you want to learn some(any)thing about programming I suggest Ringenberg. The only reason I passed was my helpful& patient GSI. Bielajew was an awful professor who uses his own textbook. Made students uncomfortable-in front of the class challenged a student who wrote an anonymous midterm eval accusing him of being s exist to take it to the dean.

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
May 12, 2012

In fairness to the Professor, a student accused the Professor of being sexiest, in favor of women, not men. I thought it was a brave move on his part to confront the issue, and his accuser to take it to the Dean, if he was serious about it.

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Jul 10, 2012

TAKE THIS PROFESSOR!! Projects are easy enough for you to have a social life, but hard enough for you to feel accomplished in the concept. GSI's put in extra effort to explain concepts. It is hard in beginning but gets better as you understand more. You work from his book & its free. Read the book and do all the problems...you will thank me later.

4.0
2.0
ENG101
Aug 14, 2012

I had no idea what computer programming was before this class, but Bielajew still made it possible to do well in this class. By the end, I really enjoyed it! Projects aren't too hard and only the final exam was really hard. He is more concerned with learning about the concepts than the nitty gritty details which was great.

4.0
3.0
NERS311
Aug 15, 2012

No complaints. If you follow along with the material and put in the time to do the homework properly, you'll succeed.

5.0
2.0
ENGIN101
Dec 7, 2012

I really enjoyed Professor Bielajew's class. I learned a great deal from it. I suggest going to lectures because he often talks about codes on the exams. The projects are very easy and he is really helpful if you're confused. The exams are completely far, but challenging. He gives practice quizzes that resemble the exam. Also, read the book!

5.0
4.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

I absolutely loved this class!!! I came in with a little bit of programming background and this class just added to what I already knew.

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

good professor

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

I had prior programming experience but it seemed like he was an excellent teacher for new programmers. He was always clear when discussing somewhat complex topics, an overall phenomenal teacher. poipoipoi

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

He knows what he's talking about, and he is eager to answer questions.

3.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

Overall he's fair, especially for those who are new at programming like I was. However, Bielajew spends far more time talking than writing, and personally I found it hard to learn through this style. I spent the whole semester learning more from the GSI's and the textbook than going to his lectures. Read his textbook, and you'll be set.

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

Be sure to attend the lectures often, a lot of important syntax and information he teaches in lecture is not in the book.

3.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

It is clear that Bielajew knows what hes talking about but it seems that he just doesn't care to much about engaging student outside a select few who are super interested in programming. I learned pretty much everything from my lab not lecture. even though i am not a fan of the teaching the exams were easy and straightforward.

5.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

Be sure to attend his lecture. Overall a very good professor

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

Amazing professor. I had C++ experience before coming in, but was still able to learn new material even the first few weeks of class. He is very thorough and answers a lot of questions that students might have in class. Make sure to attend lectures and do the practice quizzes, doing so will make the exams seem like a piece of cake.

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

Very fair and straighforward teacher. He cuts the BS and gets right to the point. His exams are very similar to practice exams, so do the practice exams to prepare. I highly recommend him to anyone interested in programming

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

Hello, He is very good professor, explanations are very clear. And he keeps class concentrated on the topic by telling interesting facts about upcoming project and sometimes by making jokes. I found him very interesting.

3.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

A good professor if you have prior programming experience. Otherwise his class can be next to useless. Sure, his jokes are corny, but I found them funny. Exams were easy if you took the time to do the practice quizzes. All in all, I enjoyed the class, but it can be hard and confusing for a person that has never programmed before.

4.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

Important to attend lectures...sometimes. That is, when he isn't speaking in 'wingdings'. As a beginner programmer, it was difficult to understand what was going on. However, he answers all questions and responds to emails (A+ on that). VERY approachable, and if you're having any trouble, don't be afraid to ask.

4.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

Have to go to early lectures but not really after that. Everything is coding so if you can do that, the class is quite easy. Bielajew is very nice and entertaining to people who actually are interesting in coding but doesnt "teach" exactly and is kind of boring

4.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 7, 2012

Great class! His lectures are really interesting, and he shows you all the quirks to be found when you are first learning programming. The projects are straightforward, all you have to do is put in some time to get them done. The exam preparation materials are excellent, and as long as you attend lecture and do the practice exams you should do well

3.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 8, 2012

I took this class having no prior programming background and definitely learned a lot. Lecture can be very long at times but helpful if you stay awake. Bielajew tries to be very fun and lively. Not all of his jokes are as funny as the kids in the first rows make them out to be, but he is a good guy and I enjoyed learning from him.

5.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 9, 2012

His practice exams go over what you will need to know for the test. The assignments teach you the beginnings of programming. This prof is good.

3.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 9, 2012

This class would be an easy A if you have prior programming experience or if you're interested in the topic. Lectures are beneficial if you can figure out how to follow his coding without a computer/if you can stay awake.

3.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 9, 2012

Lecture is either a hit or a miss. Bielajew is nice and can be helpful, but gets easily distracted by obscure, unimportant questions. That said, I had no previous experience and learned a lot through his class, mostly from labs and the book (which he wrote himself).

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 9, 2012

This professor teaches a lot of code without a computer, but if you pay attention, it is pretty easy to follow. He uses his own textbook which is online and easily accessible. The Lab is very important to go to and teaches how to use the code you learn in lecture. Overall, the class can be fun and interesting if you pay attention.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 9, 2012

As a student who has never programmed, I found that Professor Bielajew is encouraging and his lectures are disorganized, but useful. However, he gets distracted during lecture, which makes the class hard to follow at times. I'm not the best programmer, but overall - if one does the practice tests, assignments, and the reading - the class is easy.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 9, 2012

He is one of the best professors around for engr101 but matlab wasnt as well explained with the kind of clarity that C++ was

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 9, 2012

Fun professor, taught us what we needed to know and was VERY straight forward about what was on the tests.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 10, 2012

Not a bad teacher. He would clearly teach for 30 minutes and then spend the rest of the class showing off his programs. Helpful if you needed a question answered and if you just look at the practice tests you should do fine on exams.

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 10, 2012

Great teacher. Go to lecture and read the practice tests and you might even figure out a few of the questions on the test!

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 10, 2012

He is a very enthusiastic professor who is very passionate about programming.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 10, 2012

As someone with experience with C++ the first 2/3 of the class were easy, but I still learned some things so it was still interesting. Matlab felt rushed and not as clear, though. Lectures tended to feel really long but he had a music break half way through which helped.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 11, 2012

He is a pretty good prof and a really good person. Cares about students' success. Teaches what is necessary for exams, tho not necessarily all projects. Sometimes, class felt a little like "hey, look as this cool thing I did" and not a typical organized lecture. Tad erratic. His book is GREAT. One of the best prof's I've had in Engr. Take him.

4.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 11, 2012

I had no experience with C++ until this class, and he made it fairly easy to learn. Make sure you read through the assignments because they are long and it is easy to miss things that may cost you a lot of points. Matlab was rushed and unclear. Everybody kept saying, look it up on your own time. Would have been helpful if they actually taught it.

4.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 11, 2012

Taught C++ gloriously. But, his matlab lectures were not up to par. Very, very rushed and tough to understand even though it's supposedly "easier". Final matlab project had difficulty of the final C++ project...but we only received about 3 weeks worth of matlab lectures vs 3 months of C++ lectures. Overall decent prof.

3.0
3.0
ENGIN101
Dec 11, 2012

Tends to show applications of programming more than walkthroughs of material

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 11, 2012

Great professor, treats the class like what it is meant to be - an INTRODUCTION to programming class. also gives interesting applications of the material.

4.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 12, 2012

Taught C++ well. He made some successful jokes and lots of not so successful ones, but he definitely is great at programming. C++ was good, but Matlab was pretty rushed. He seems to go over a lot of excess material, but his programs are manageable and fair for beginners.

4.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 12, 2012

Does a decent job explaining everything. Occasionally goes off topic and sometimes shows code that beginners struggle to understand. Book is very helpful and lectures are worth going to. Can be hilarious at times which is a bonus

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 12, 2012

Very solid professor. His engr 101 is one of the easiest classes I've ever taken from elementary school to college inclusive. My only real complaint is that he let's his GSIs grade you however they want, and my GSI chose to grade on participation. Might as well grade me for penmanship while you're at it.

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 12, 2012

Super easy class. Almost too easy in fact. Even though I got an A, I left the class still feeling like a complete novice programmer. I wouldn't have minded seeing some more advanced topics in the class.

5.0
3.0
ENGR101
Dec 13, 2012

Profesor Bielajew kept programming on an understandable level. Not going to lie you have to put in the work but believe me it is worth it in the end. He keeps things fun with the projects and the dude has a good sense of humor. Don't be afraid to go to office hours or talk to him!! He is extremely helpful

3.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 14, 2012

Helpful and means well. His lectures aren't the best, you will have to study on your own A LOT. Don't rely on lectures alone to understand the material. Workload is reasonable, grading is reasonable. Do the quizzes if you want a good grade. Because if you don't do the quizzes your screwed. Makes a lot of corny jokes in class, which can be funny

5.0
4.0
NERS312
Apr 18, 2013

Homework can be a bit rough at times but he is very fair and straight forward. You can tell he cares a lot about the undergraduate class. Had more than a few mind=blown moments in this class. If you put in the work you will do well.

3.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 5, 2013

Bielajew is an okay professor. His lectures are not very helpful to be honest, but the labs are. The online textbook is useless and not well laid out, I don't think I've read it once. The class overall is pretty easy. He taught C++ well but the MATLAB section of the course was awful. Very rushed, he seemed to assume that we knew more than we did.

2.0
3.0
ENG101
Dec 10, 2013

His lectures were near useless and he never actually taught in lecture. All he did was show us his codes etc etc. He also wasn't very helpful when I went to his office hours once and he made me feel like I wasn't welcome there because I was asking simple questions and wasting his time because he is "above me". You learn everything in lab with GSIs

4.0
4.0
ENGR101
Dec 15, 2013

Bielajew's lectures are a little bit incoherent, and he does not really explain what is behind his codes and programs. Yet he has some funny jokes, and can answer higher level questions. Projects take a lot of effort, but the GSI's are helpful and you learn a lot. Exams are extremely fair, and Bielajew makes sure you are prepared for the exams.

3.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 15, 2013

If you have previous experience in programming the class is terrible. Way too easy as compared to other sections of 101. He also isn't very helpful when you ask questions.

2.0
2.0
ENGR101
Dec 19, 2013

Class was overall pretty easy. I came in with no experience in programming and didn't struggle very much at all. Professor Bielajew just enjoys breaking his code instead of explaining it. Class was basically a waste, I learned everything from my GSI in lab.

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 20, 2013

Professor Bielajew was great, really funny guy. His first couple lectures were very helpful, after that I mainly learned from labs. His class is admittedly much easier than the other 101 sections, but I came in with no programming experience and now I feel pretty confident in my abilities. I recommend him.

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Dec 20, 2013

As a freshman with no prior coding experience, Professor Bielajew made the transition into C++ and Matlab very easy. I learned more in laboratory section than I did in lecture, but Bielajew was enthusiastic about teaching coding and did his job extremely well. I feel prepared for advanced coding courses after his C++ preparation.

5.0
2.0
ENGR101
Grade: A
Jan 13, 2014

The Prof is a great teacher. He's very knowledgeable and can answer basically every question you throw at him, and he's very helpful during office hours. Not to mention his exams are arguably the most friendly. He was funny and informative during lecture, but most of the learning was done in lab, so definitely go to that.

5.0
1.0
ENGR101
Jan 20, 2014

The class was very informative and I learned a lot of information. The class handled students of many levels of prior knowledge. I had never coded before this class. The lectures are mostly examples and I learned a lot in Lab. Textbook is past lecture notes that are hard to understand if you have never coded before.

2.0
2.0
ENGR101
Feb 28, 2014

Really smart guy - studied theoretical physics or something like that at stanford. really wasn't made to be an engr 101 professor. get ringenberg. bielajew's lectures were nearly useless - he just plays around with his code. the GSIs were awesome, though.

5.0
3.0
NERS250
Grade: A+
Apr 14, 2015

Knows what he's talking about. Loves to get off topic.

2.0
5.0
NERS311
Grade: A-
Feb 25, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He gave the most useless lectures and the most insanely difficult assignments and tests which did little to further my understanding of the material. I felt like I was going through some sort of NERS hazing process. The grading was lenient though.

Lots of homework
1.0
1.0
ENG101
Grade: A-
May 21, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I took the class in 2010 and for some reason my previous review doesn't show. Needless to say I left a pretty harsh review. After reading my review, he made a point to call out the person that left the review in lecture and left a brain shaped toy on his podium and said I could come retrieve my brain because I lost it. Super petty guy. Easy Class.

Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

97%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
A- (2)
A (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 4 reported grades
A-: 2
A: 1
A+: 1
Common Tags
Lots of homework (1)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.25 avg change
Dec
Jan
Feb
Apr
Feb
May
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENGINEERING101

5.0

(1)

NERS250

5.0

(1)

NERS312

4.5

(4)

ENGR101

4.1

(98)

ENG101

4.1

(39)
+4 more courses
Difficulty by Course

NERS311

4.3

NERS312

4.3

ENGN101

4.0

NERS250

3.0

ENG101

2.8

Similar Professors