3.4

Alex Dick

English - University of British Columbia

3.4
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
72%
Would Retake
84
Reviews
3.4
Quality
3.4
Difficulty
3.5
Helpful
3.3
Clarity

72%

Would Retake

84

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

28

4

19

3

19

2

11

1

7

What Students Say

teaching assistant is awful

ENG359 - 2.0 rating

He's arrogant and quick to judge

ENG220 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

68%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

92% confidence
Based on 14 grades
Most common grades:
A- (4)
B (3)
A (3)
Grade Distribution
A(5)B(3)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(5)
Based on 18 reported grades
A-: 4
B: 3
A: 3
Not sure yet: 3
Common Tags
Get ready to read (11)
Inspirational (4)
Hilarious (4)
Participation matters (4)
Amazing lectures (4)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (2)
Tough grader (2)
Lecture heavy (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.03 avg change
Aug
Dec
Jan
Sep
Oct
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

355

5.0

(1)

ENG120

5.0

(1)

ENGL359A

5.0

(2)

ENGL220

4.5

(6)

ENGL393

4.5

(2)
+22 more courses
Difficulty by Course

112

5.0

ENGLISH

5.0

ENG3

5.0

ENG220

4.3

220

4.0

Reviews (84)
3.0
3.0
359
Dec 10, 2002

He's headed in the right direction...

2.0
3.0
110
Feb 7, 2003

What a nutcase! But he's so funny-class is entertaining if nothing else...

4.0
3.0
ENGL359
Mar 11, 2003

tough, but nice

3.0
2.0
ENG110
Mar 13, 2003

This guy is the biggest nerd I've ever seen. He played a Quake III demo on the first day. wth? His lectures are so boring I don't go anymore, just go to the discussion groups.

5.0
3.0
ENG110
Mar 13, 2003

Very fun and good course taught well by a young and energetic prof. Quake was great! Not nerdy at all except that he knows how to use technology I guess.

5.0
2.0
359
Mar 18, 2003

very interesting class...

4.0
2.0
ENG110
May 30, 2003

he's really passionate about what he's teaching. it's nice because he's young and enthusiastic about everything. lots of notes and he doesn't wait for you to finish copying down. His course website is good though, with lots of online study guides.

5.0
3.0
ENG220
Jun 18, 2003

Alex is a way cool prof. He's easy going and so passionate about literature. He used modern examples to help us understand 8th century literature. He really challenges his students.

5.0
2.0
ENG110
Jul 9, 2003

Pretty good prof, explained things well, gave you time to look over questions for in-class essays so u could prepare arguments and quotes. One class that u don't really fall asleep in, very enthusiastic about the material.

3.0
3.0
ENG110
Aug 12, 2003

No Comments

4.0
5.0
ENGLISH
Sep 5, 2003

Very hard class, expected us to know a lot of background info just because he does, although he is VERY knowledgable. And whoever thought he was hot...!?!

3.0
2.0
ENGL110
Sep 7, 2003

Don't get on his bad side(hehe), but he is nice! Puts TONNES of notes on the overhead and you have no time to copy them, and you really dont need them, just sit back and listen. I STONGLY advise going to the LAST CLASS!

2.0
5.0
ENG110
Nov 29, 2003

class was insane hard. hes an interesting prof, and talks about cool stuff.. but his papers and mts are compleley irrelevent to lectures. very hard teacher.

5.0
2.0
ENGL220
Nov 29, 2003

hilarious, very entertaining. also very helpful during office hours. his expectations might be a bit heavy though...

3.0
5.0
ENGL359
Dec 13, 2003

lives up to his last name. doesn't teach 'romantics' teaches other stuff-'sensiblities'. new prof-expects way too much. thinks his class is the center of the university and not very open to other people's ideas if they are not the same as his. not good.

3.0
4.0
ENG359
Dec 13, 2003

Knows his stuff but likes to hear his own voice, either coming out of his mouth or yours. Not much room for interpretation or free thought. A LOT OF READING. You can get a lot out of it, but BE PREPARED.

3.0
5.0
ENG359
Dec 17, 2003

This is a very challenging class, he has high expectations, engaging lectures.. but be warned... there is a lot of readings which are either hard, or very boring.... This class passes by fast, but it is really hard!

3.0
4.0
ENG359
Feb 14, 2004

No Comments

3.0
3.0
ENG110
Feb 16, 2004

EXTREMELY BAD TEACHER ALERT! This guy is extremely unfriendly out of class, he expects you to just regurgitate his notes when writing in-class essays, and doesn't go deep into lit. The only good that came out of this cource was that i had a GREAT TA!

5.0
3.0
220
Mar 6, 2004

Learned a lot. Tough, but fair. C'mon ppl, comments to his name are pathetic - If u got a bad mark, it's ur own damn fault. Good lecturer & helps out a lot. May seem intimidating, but that's cuz he knows his ****.

5.0
3.0
ENGL220
Mar 16, 2004

Very clearly outlines what he expects for assignments. Completely approachable and helpful. Class discussions are open and interesting. I never found him to be arrogant or closed-minded, he's very careful to treat students ideas with respect.

2.0
5.0
ENG110
May 12, 2004

No Comments

1.0
4.0
ENG110
May 15, 2004

He acts as if he accepted your opinion, but in fact, he disagrees with you before you even open your mouth. He lives in disguise. Knowledgable but no more than other profs. If you can choose, don't choose him.

1.0
4.0
ENGLISH110
May 20, 2004

Bad Bad Bad Prof. He doesn't allow you to use dictionary during exam while other profs do.

5.0
4.0
ENG220
Jun 29, 2004

Intelligent, wry, and ultimately, a nice guy. He'll go out of his way to help you on assignments -- which mind you, aren't easy -- but, you'll feel like you learned something at the end of the day. And isn't that the whole point?

2.0
5.0
ENG220
Oct 6, 2004

agreeing with other comments- he loves to hear his own voice in your essays, boring reading, and hard class. He offers lots of help but is still unclear the whole way through.

1.0
3.0
ENG110
Oct 22, 2004

I try to listen to him in class (I REALLY DO) but it's just soooo hard NOT to zone out! he just keeps goin and going and going and goin.... AHHHHH! if the class was only 50 min it wouldn't have been so bad but two hours of Dr. Dick is just WAY too much!

3.0
3.0
ENGL110
Nov 16, 2004

He's alright, I guess. He does try to be informative in the lectures but sometimes he doesn't really succeed in making sure that the students understand what he's saying. Not the best prof in the world but certainly not the worst.

5.0
3.0
ENG110
Nov 20, 2004

His passion for teaching is very refreshing. Very intelligent and informative prof. Great class.

5.0
3.0
ENG110
Dec 12, 2004

Fun, normal

2.0
4.0
ENG110
Jan 4, 2005

No Comments

4.0
3.0
ENGL220
Jan 5, 2005

I actually liked this class and him but I could see where people wouldn't. Exam was shockingly easy, he is a hard marker with paper's though. However, if you go to him in office hours he is VERY helpful. If you are planning to be an English major take him. He get's you ready for the upper years.

5.0
3.0
ENGL220
Mar 14, 2005

For those of you who are badmouthing him, you obviously never went to his office hours. Prof. Dick is a really nice guy and extremely helpful if you give him a chance. Yes, not an EASY marker, but by no means unfair. Overall good course considering the material he has to work with.

5.0
3.0
ENGL220
Apr 4, 2005

Hmmm, to the poster who misspelled "papers," I can sorta see why he would a brutal marker. ;) I thought he was awesome myself. Cool guy, very helpful in office hours.

3.0
4.0
ENGL220
Apr 4, 2005

Generally a very good teacher, but he doesn't give out assignment details until two weeks before they're due. In addition, he blew up at a few students on two occassions, making everyone feel uncomfortable.

2.0
4.0
ENGL356
Apr 17, 2005

Dick is an arrogant man who is only interested in his own research. He expects people to kiss his ass just because he has a PHD after his name. Smart man, horrible professor.

5.0
3.0
ENGL359
Apr 26, 2005

This class falls into his area of interest and it shows. Very energetic lectures with lots of encouragement for anyone who participates. Expectations can be a little vague, but is easily approachable outside of class. Marks not exactly easy, but not terribly picky about minor errors either.

4.0
4.0
ENG112
May 8, 2005

interesting perspective, and makes you question your reasoning

5.0
3.0
ENG359
Jun 19, 2005

Dr. Dick is probably one of the best profs I have ever had. Extremely intellegent, talented lecturer, and helpful. Challenges you with paper topics, but is always available for feedback. He definitely ain't perfect (he assigns group projects, always a tedious exercise in meeting over-achievers, under-achievers, morons), but he has a lot to offer.

3.0
1.0
ENGLISH112
Sep 1, 2005

Unfriendly...

1.0
5.0
112
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Sep 13, 2005

No Comments

2.0
4.0
ENG
Mar 22, 2006

No Comments

5.0
3.0
ENG110
Mar 28, 2006

Good prof! Lectures are fun

3.0
4.0
ENGL221
Apr 14, 2006

Hard paper marker, but willing to help with papers in office hours. If you want a good paper grade definatley show him your draft!

4.0
2.0
ENG359
Jun 2, 2006

Knows what he is talking about and offers great insights. Encourages discussion and is open to new perspectives. Not boring and a nice guy. Assigns group projects...might get stuck with crazy ppl and share their mark unfortunetly.

1.0
5.0
ENGL110
Aug 10, 2006

No Comments

5.0
3.0
ENGL359
Aug 17, 2006

brilliant professor! he challenges you really to examine the works - if you like to think and you want to be passionate about what you're learning, take a class with him. yeah, he starts out abbrassive, but it's so worth it; you take so much out of his class!

4.0
4.0
ENGL110
Apr 23, 2007

In short, a really funky prof. Sets a high standard for his students. He has some pretty interesting insights into things. I enjoyed reading one of the books for class, The Jade Peony. :o)

4.0
4.0
ENG110
May 30, 2007

Great teacher, you can tell he is extremely passionate about the subject. Good reading material in this class, and if you don't understand it he explains everything in lectures. Group projects are assigned, which can be a little frusturating.

5.0
3.0
ENG110
Jun 8, 2007

because of Dr.Dick, I now enjoy literature and have become more critical in all my thinking.

3.0
4.0
ENGL110
Jun 19, 2007

this prof is great- he's interested and knowledgable in the subject and he shows it. His poetry project seems tough at first, but in the end it's just easy marks. His final is fair, but not extremely easy. Halfway through the course, he changed from putting notes up on overheads to using powerpoint- tremendous difference. Good choice of novels!

4.0
5.0
ENG3
Oct 2, 2007

He's very demanding, doesn't establish the best classroom atmosphere and over-emphasizes group work -who wants to be taught by students?- but I really felt that I'd tangibly improved after taking his class.

4.0
4.0
ENGL120
Dec 7, 2007

This class has diminished my passion for the subject, but it's probably just because we essentially did Frankenstein for the entire term. Lecture was a hostile atmosphere for discussion and it seemed like he surrounded himself with a Charlie's Angels-esque wall of TAs. However, he is a passionate, effective lecturer. There's no ignoring that.

2.0
4.0
ENG359
Mar 24, 2008

teaching assistant is awful!!!!! made me want to avoid the class like the plague

4.0
2.0
ENGL221
Apr 28, 2008

This class was very interesting. He encouraged class discussion a lot, and everyone was really insightful. The prof goes really in depth and also goes off on tangents (but in a good way) when analyzing the literature. I thought he was really easy, and seemed really nice.

5.0
3.0
ENG120
Nov 20, 2008

Professor made me realize that Mary Shelley is a genius, and Frankenstein something of a work of art. He also introduced me to Plath who is now my favorite poet, hand down. He's so insightful, really puts a lot of work into his lectures and encourages class discussion. He also uses a mix of mediums to keep things interesting. LOVED HIM

5.0
4.0
ENGL359A
Jul 12, 2009

Excellent prof, very though-provoking but also open to opinions. He will challenge you though; definitely not a class for slackers.

2.0
5.0
ENG220
Apr 7, 2011

He's arrogant and quick to judge. He's one of those professors who is likely a much better academic than teacher. He appears to base his marking on technical mechanics, versus the 'meat' of your argument per se. I would not recommend this course unless you have few opinions of your own and are happy to acquiess to his ridiculous standards.

4.0
3.0
ENG110
Mar 20, 2013

He's a really nice guy. Willing to help you with questions. But his lectures can be a little boring, although they are chock full of information. Definitely do need to attend lectures in order to understand some of his points.

5.0
3.0
ENGL359A
Apr 4, 2013

One of the best teachers I've ever had. Funny, interesting, and doesn't treat the class like you're still in high school--willing to communicate ideas to the class that might actually take a little reading and thinking about. Avoid if you're stupid and/or lazy, basically.

3.0
4.0
ENGL110
Grade: C
May 13, 2014

Worse mark in my university degree. TAs marked really hard and the final exam was tough

4.0
4.0
ENGL111
May 1, 2015

He's very good at teaching you how to read literature at a university level rather than a high school one. A little bit of effort goes a very long way. Would take again.

4.0
3.0
ENGL221
Grade: B
Jun 30, 2015

Sometimes his language can be confusing, which makes notes hard to parse, but he's a genuinely kind guy. He's knowledgeable and sensitive about minority issues, including women's and queer rights, which was a major plus when it came to discussion and lectures. He's very understanding if you need extensions, too.

1.0
5.0
ENG359
Sep 6, 2015

Started the course passionate about the Romantics and left mentally checked out of that era. Besides Byron, I would rather be skinned alive than read some of those texts again. I got back one of the major essays with a C and the comments literally only discussed my grammar. Didn't felt like he personally cared about us. GROUP. PROJECTS. BEWARE!

4.0
4.0
ENG359
Grade: B
Dec 23, 2015

He genuinely cares about his students and wants us to do well, but he does have very specific expectations for papers and assignments. Don't try to halfass your way in his course, you will suffer. Very smart and knowledgeable man, I enjoyed his lectures and the course in general. He tries to prepare you for grad school which is helpful.

3.0
2.0
ENGL111
Grade: A
Jan 3, 2016

He's pretty clear in giving lectures and he can be funny when he wants to be. His book choices are great. He and his TAs have very clear guidelines on what they expect on the essays. as long as you show up in class and pay attention you'll pretty much conquer the class.

4.0
4.0
ENGL111
Dec 5, 2016
Would take again

He is an insightful man, and have critical opinions about the materials. attendance is not mandatory but he does not post lectures on connect and the notes are essential for understanding the course. work load is not heavy, 3 papers for the entire semester. great prof in general.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Inspirational
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
ENG110
Apr 1, 2018
Would take again

He is literally amazing I am thrilled to listen to his lectures I'm not even registered in his class but auditing becomes mandatory after the first time I heard him It's like way up higher than my usual class' level and if you are lucky you will meet an amazing group of intelligent classmates you will LOVE their conversations with the prof.

Inspirational
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
5.0
3.0
ENG110
Apr 14, 2018
Would take again

Great prof with really engaging lectures! I do agree, the material covered in lecture is not necessarily needed in order to do well in the course. But, his lectures are interesting and his book choices are great! Such a great prof and fun course!

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
4.0
ENG110
Grade: A-
Jun 22, 2018
Would take again

One of my favourite profs ever! I looked forward to going to lectures and took notes constantly, not just because I thought they'd be useful to bring up on papers/the exam, but because his opinions and ideas were crazy interesting and made me think way more than any other English course I've taken ever has! Highly recommend, it was a great course!!

Respected
Inspirational
Hilarious
3.0
3.0
ENGL110
Grade: A-
Nov 25, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Lectures didn't really help. I skipped a solid chunk of lectures and still did fine. Found him to be a bit pretentious. He used obscure words that many first-year students would not have in their vocabulary. Could've made his lectures more digestible, especially since many students didn't have a choice to take the course--was a degree requirement.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
4.0
ENGL211
Grade: B+
Apr 27, 2020
Would take again

He really knows his stuff, so be prepared to really work to understand the theory he teaches. He starts off the year with a tough assignment but it really shows you how much he cares when you read all the feedback he gives on it and by the end of the term, if you put in the work, you'll get a lot out of his class.

Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
Tough grader
2.0
3.0
ENGL200
Nov 20, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Alex is a nice guy and is pretty understanding about extensions but that's all I can really say about him. He is terribly boring and the texts he chooses are boring as well. Normally I don't have problems with writing discussion posts since it's not that much work but god do I despise this course and regret taking it. Unfortunately it's mandatory.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
355
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 14, 2024
Would take again

I've never felt inclined to write a rmp review about a professor, but Alex was such a magnificent prof, that I feel that it's only fair to hype him up online. Romantic poetry is certainly not in my realm of expertise, but Alex was very helpful in guiding me through the challenging aspects. Go to his office hours, you'll have a great time!

Participation matters
Gives good feedback
Caring
5.0
3.0
ENGL248
Grade: A
Aug 1, 2024
Would take again

Alex is a king! He is so funny and kind, and puts so much effort into his lectures. He builds relationships with students, he is accomodating and he wants you to do well in his class. He had great reads selected for the class. Taking him again next year and you should too! His TA last term - Oliver Bedard, was also awesome.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Hilarious
4.0
4.0
ENGL393
Grade: A-
Dec 13, 2024
Would take again

Dr. Dick is highly knowledgable on a wide range of theory, and his lectures are engaging and intellectual. Not the kind of classes you can get away with zoning out in (nor would you, as his enthusiasm is infectious). Take his classes if you are genuinely interested in learning new perspectives.

Get ready to read
Group projects
Amazing lectures
5.0
3.0
110
Grade: A+
Dec 24, 2024
Would take again

I can see myself attending Alex's lectures even without being in his class, his style of lecture is an engaging “performance” and includes such interesting views on texts read in the course. However, I did find reading so many texts revolving around Frankenstein daunting at times.. Grading will depend on your section's TA.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
ENGL393
Grade: A
Dec 24, 2024
Would take again

dr. dick is awesome - knowledgeable, funny, gives great lectures, and genuinely cares about his students. his lectures are mainly discussion based and his assignments and grading are fair (grp proj, solo proj, final paper, participation, no final). engl majors will do fine - others may find it difficult (he expects a command of literary concepts).

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Gives good feedback
4.0
3.0
110
Grade: A-
Jan 9, 2025
Would take again

Good overall, but I don't really attend lectures. You can still get a good grade without attending them. Also, Olivier is the BEST TA!

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Lots of homework
1.0
5.0
220
Sep 2, 2025

It is disappointing that, in an institution that prides itself on fostering "an educational space that invites divergent viewpoints on contentious subjects," a professor such as Dr. Dick has to instruct. Class is like Plato's Cave, but everyone has seen the outside world and pretends they haven't because Dr. Dick is really keen about his cave.

2.0
3.0
ENGL248
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 8, 2025

With a class like "detective fiction," I wish the assignments were more short story-based, rather than writing essays about other authors. This class should be interesting, and while I think Alex is a really nice person, his lectures, unfortunately, are extremely boring.

Get ready to read
So many papers
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
ENG110
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 1, 2025
Would take again

Loves what he is teaching, weird but interesting class. Prepare to read A LOT. I had to pirate 90% of the books or ask around for free PDFs, but if you want to buy them, do it as soon as you can they will disappear like the wind. Attendance is not mandatory. Study the lectures and pray you get a good TA (mine was STRICT)

Get ready to read
Inspirational
So many papers
3.0
2.0
110
Grade: A+
Dec 5, 2025
Would take again

He made some of the readings somewhat more interesting and really dived deep between the words. Most of the grading is done by TAs

Get ready to read
Hilarious
3.0
4.0
ENGL248
Grade: B
Dec 24, 2025

A good professor but the course itself was boring. The majority of our grade comes from in-class essays, and lectures weren't really useful. Worst part was the TA; Oliver Bedard. He's the most pretentious person I've ever met. He gave two weeks worth of confusing lectures and was unnecessarily passive aggressive on essay feedback. Ruined it for me

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

68%

Textbook Required

50%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

92% confidence
Based on 14 grades
Most common grades:
A- (4)
B (3)
A (3)
Grade Distribution
A(5)B(3)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(5)
Based on 18 reported grades
A-: 4
B: 3
A: 3
Not sure yet: 3
Common Tags
Get ready to read (11)
Inspirational (4)
Hilarious (4)
Participation matters (4)
Amazing lectures (4)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (2)
Tough grader (2)
Lecture heavy (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.03 avg change
Aug
Dec
Jan
Sep
Oct
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

355

5.0

(1)

ENG120

5.0

(1)

ENGL359A

5.0

(2)

ENGL220

4.5

(6)

ENGL393

4.5

(2)
+22 more courses
Difficulty by Course

112

5.0

ENGLISH

5.0

ENG3

5.0

ENG220

4.3

220

4.0

Similar Professors