1.1
Quality4.1
Difficulty3%
Would Retake91
Reviews3%
Would Retake
91
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
2
4
0
3
0
2
3
1
86
What Students Say
“Avogadro didn't die for this”
APSC-182 - 1.0 rating“I would prefer Jesse pinkman to teach me this”
APSC-182 - 1.0 ratingClass Info
Attendance Mandatory
5%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.67 avg changeRatings by Course
APSC-182
1.1
(91)Difficulty by Course
APSC-182
4.1
Reviews (91)
Prof got first 4 weeks of lecture formulas wrong. Gets example question in lectures wrong. Practice question answer key commonly wrong. Doesn't know her own questions. Nervous speaker and reads off slides.
She doesn't teach well. She takes stuff from that textbook and even with that, all her answers are wrong. She also kept changing the values on midterm questions. Oh and her spelling is on something else.
Just generally bad, mad so many typos and mistakes in math, lectures, exams and quizzes. Overall not a very fun experience.
Often every lecture had mistakes in the formulas making them a waste of time since I have to learn them on my own. There were even mistakes on the midterm. Would not recommend.
Many mistakes both in lectures and on exams.
Constant Mistakes during lecture and exams. She was changing multiple questions while the exam was being taken.
Terrible lecturer. Gazillion mistakes during lectures. Quadrillion mistakes while marking and grading.
This instructor does not know what she is doing. Lecture notes to not match review notes, answer keys or other formula sheets; can't trust her. Every other lecture has mathematical mistakes/errors and half of the next lecture is spent reviewing how to do the previous things correctly, this causes a lot of confusion.
such a bad prof
This prof was basically illiterate. Her slides were horribly written, and answer keys to practice exams were wrong more often than not. There were several mistakes on both the midterm paper, and the final exam questions, which she corrected during the test period. Horrible prof, decently easy course though.
The material itself is just okay. About her teaching and mistakes, I don't know what pressures she was under, maybe it's her job or somehting else, but I think she could be a better prof under the right circumstances.
professor did not know how to lecture properly and made many mistakes in calculations both in lectures and on problem sets and even exams (both midterm and final where she corrected mistakes). The course itself was structured decently with the work being relatively evenly distributed throughout the semester (mostly due to labs)
This professor did not know how to teach the course, I do not believe that this professor is an engineering majoring professor.
Messes up practice questions constantly and is super unclear about quiz instructions, especially around significant figures. Would not recommend.
Assignment questions and lab are super hard and difficult to understand. Would not recommend.
Prof does not know how to teach, always messing up practice questions. EXTREMELY unclear about labs and assignments making them practically impossible to get a good mark on.
Consistently messes up examples and fails to give clear instructions
Terrible prof, makes incredibly unfair assignments and impossible to get good grades.
She makes mistakes 24/7. She cannot teach us at all. She makes assignments that are literally impossible to do. I have never learned this course and I could still do a better job than her.
The one 'great' review is wrong. prepare to teach this content to yourself
Had no clue what she was doing. Answer keys where often wrong and she had no idea how to do any of the practice examples in class. Not sure how she managed to get this job, whoever hired her should be embarrassed.
please don't!
VERY VERY HORRIBLE
She does not answer emails, and lecture slides and homework are full of mistakes, and these mistakes are in very important spots too. Can't even ask for clarification because she doesn't answer emails!
holi moli, prof always seems so nervous, making mistakes in her work AND IN THE HOMEWORK THAT CONTRIBUTES TO OUR GRADES. SOME OF THE QUESTIONS ARE ACTUALLY IMPOSSIBLE-not as in hard, as in literally impossible to do. The one day she was sick and TA taught the class, I learnt so much more, and preferred them much much more.
This class gave me plenty of time to catch up on sleep without missing anything important. The professor will spent more than 10 minutes on a question that should take at max, 4 minutes, so feel free to close your eyes and catch up on those lost hours of sleep or do homework for other classes.
Bad. Bad. Bad. Bad.
You will get more out of this class by watching YouTube videos related to the topics. Lectures are boring and reads directly off the slides, messes up on calculations done together as a class and denies it by saying “I'll check the values later but this should be right”. Assignments had errors leaving it sometimes impossible to get questions right.
Overall, heavily not recommended. This professor purely reads off of slides, and contributes little to none with class activity (for example, questions and examples). In addition, will not help even tho there is no tutorial that comes with this course. Therefore, avoid at all cost in near future for APSC_O 182.
All lectures consist of reading slides and spending way too much time on examples. She fails to understand the meaning of being a professor as its easier to read her slides than understand a single word she says. Truly unbearable class and I would never wish to have her as a professor again.
She never provides anything valuable to the lectures and simply reads verbatim off the slides. Better off just studying the notes posted online. She can't even do practice problems correctly as she constantly makes mistakes. Save yourselves the time and energy and do other meaningful things.
This professor purely reads off the lecture notes and does not add any additional useful information. She consistently makes errors while completing her own examples in class and often takes a lot of time from the next lecture to correct her mistakes. Overall she makes a fundamentally pretty simple course quite difficult to understand.
Skip class and do the course on your own. Nuff said.
The absolute worst professor I have ever seen or heard of. I think a middle school teacher could teach this better than whatever she is doing. The content isn't even hard it's the teacher who makes it more confusing and makes so many mistakes in the notes and the slides, so you have no idea what is true or not.
How is this foo getting paid $150k a year?!?!!?!??!?!?!?! A blind and mute squirrel could teach better
awful teacher, constantly making mistakes, barely puts any material to practice for exams, makes bugged quizzes that are for marks. One of the worst teachers I've ever had.
midterm way too fast no time
This professor needs to be fired, if you take this course please consider reporting her to the dean of administration because this professor did not get her doctorate from a real university. Please be advised to STUDY doing the practice questions VERY FAST otherwise you will not finish the midterm on time.
missing coefficients and unclear lectures
It's impossible to understand or succeed in this course because the prof doesn't know what she is talking about. She constantly makes mistakes in her practice problems and her slides are riddled with spelling mistakes. If you absolutely have to take this class don't bother going to the lectures and just try your best to teach yourself. :/
Made the midterm ridiculously long and would not stop yapping during the test. Forgot to put up required values that were needed for one problem and wasted ten minutes. Lectures not worth going too, the henchmen from fortnite are more literate then she is. Consistently mispells at a second grade level. Absolute embarresment to the UBC name.
How are you supposed to learn when the professor doesn't know the material
Her rating should be negative 5 stars
Jit graduated from mcdonalds university
She messes up every practice problem. I am confident she wouldn't pass the class if she took it herself
abysmal teaching style and can't teach at all. lectures are a snooze fest so don't bother going. does she even understand the material herself? how is she a professor, let alone have a PhD. Report her to the dean. Midterm was 45 minutes for 5 long, lengthy, hard questions. Quite unfair considering last years cohort had 80min for 4 questions.
who let her teach
Avogadro didn't die for this.
I would prefer Jesse pinkman to teach me this.
This professor is the worst teacher I've ever had. she only reads off the slides and I am honestly unsure if she understands the material herself. The unacceptable factor was that she gave needed values/constants on the midterm halfway through the test, resulting in a heavy loss of time and effecting all subsequent questions.
Avoid having Alyse Kiesser as a teacher. She struggles with the material, reads off slides, gets examples wrong, and often says she'll post corrections (usually wrong) on Canvas later. She provided incorrect values during the midterm and changed them after 10 minutes.
jesus help us
Alyse Kiesser fails as a teacher. Her lack of engagement is downright horrendous and deeply concerning. She does not seem to be invested in her teaching or in the success of her students. Her lectures are basically novels since all she does is read off them. So I recommend skipping her lectures so you don't get confused by her bullshit.
I would rater get railed then have to sit through another one of her lectures. gonna skip from here on out.
I can't escape this hell So many times I've tried But I'm still caged inside Somebody get me through this nightmare I can't control myself So what if you can see the darkest side of me? No one would ever change this animal I have become Help me believe it's not the real me Somebody help me tame this animal (This animal, this animal)
Horrible prof
skipping the rest of her lectures, better to teach myself the class...
Genuinely terrible at delivering the course material. Couldn't even solve the example questions in the lecture without the answers beside her. Didn't give a vital constant to the students taking a midterm, resulting in time wasted for that section. Result of which made for an unfair midterm between the two sections
The midterm and the way the prof teaches id not great. The midterm everyone could not finish im time as 50 minutes were given for way too many questions. The teaching style of the prof Is not good and you don't gain any information for going to the class
Excruciating.
Can't understand her own in-class example questions. Very few people finished the midterm exam. This course is completely carried by the TAs.
It's unbelievable how bad this teacher is. She has somehow discovered the ability to make students unlearn material. Midterm was an absolute scam ggs.
Dr. Kiesser's a caring prof if you actually speak to her. The lectures are disorganized, but errors aren't as frequent as RMP conveys. Sure, the midterm had a mistake, but its difficulty level was very fair, and scaling could still be announced. She could improve, but it's unreasonable to attack her character or credentials for one bad midterm.
This professor does not set students up for success nor understand the content herself. She forgets necessary constants on exams making the questions impossible to solve. She cannot even solve problems correctly in class. That midterm exam set students up for failure no matter how much they studied.
crazy prof
To the person who rated her two stars. What are you smoking? This isn't just about the midterm — she's just a horrible prof all in all. And as for the midterm, as long as she gave us questions of the same caliber to practice on, I'm sure no one would be complaining.
Gets lost and confused while teaching her own lectures. Gets confused while solving her own practice problems during lectures. Doesn't provide any extra resources to be used for studying ie practice problems/review material
There is a student rebellion over this professor….AVOID! Looks like a DEI appointment, sadly for a great school like UBC.
honestly amazed she aint fired yet, worst prof ive ever had 0/10000. never explains any concepts or equations whatsoever. HORRIBLE PROF BRO
Depressing.
Not a fan of her slide shows
Nah but FR FR lowkey a fire prof takes time to solve examples and makes a ton of hahaha funny comments while lecturing about her kids and slime, gets me going for the rest of the day. She'll spend about like 20-40 minutes on a problem (class is 50 mins) and get it wrong. Clearly testing us, to see if we can see the mistake, truly inspirational. (:
Teacher is terrible in every way. Forgot to provide constants for a midterm, provided them midway through the exam. In the final 5 minutes she changed constants value without notifying anyone forcing recalculations during crucial time period. Never take her class. UNHOLY BEINGS OF HER STATURE ARE THE EMBODIEMENT OF EVIL
If you don't want to learn anything and you want a really bad mark take this class
rolling on the floor laughing
Goofy Proof
Person who gave 2 stars a few reviews below smokes crack and eats drywall
I HATE HER. She reads off slides and once the slides are changed by someone else, she doesn't know what to do. SHE SHIULD GO BACK AND REDO UNDERGRADUATE. Course is not hard but she is so difficult to understand and compensate.
Worst prof ever. Doesn't know herself what she is teaching and doesnt even know how to teach
This professor seems too comfortable resting on tenure. Lectures are dull, riddled with errors, and lack respect for students. Thankfully, the TAs make the class tolerable. If teaching isn't her passion, she should focus on research. Her approach gives first-year engineering students an unnecessarily negative start in an already tough field. Horrid
Whoever gave two stars should reconsider everything
Don't be mistaken by the two stars, though her lectures can be straight forward, nearly everything else in the course is a complete shtshow. Lack of response to emails. Horrible labs. Horrible tests. Completely disorganized.
Absolutely terrible prof. Just her ability to teach is to blame. TA's replaced her for one lecture when she was sick and did a much much much better job. Can't do any of the examples she has in her slides, she tries, but then gets em wrong. TERRIBLE
Literally the worst professor.
The material of this class is not challenging, the way it's taught is indecipherable. This class is a slog. Professor Kiesser is not strong teacher. She doesn't answer emails. We don't get marks back. She stumbles over her own lecture slides every class. The way she teaches you're better off not attending lectures and just self studying.
She was reading from her slides all the time and made so many mistakes while solving problems in class. She spent a lot of time on the easiest slides but just almost skimmed through the hardest ones. Assignments were way harder than the problems from the lectures. Wouldn't like to take her class ever again.
..........................
She may have made some mistakes but in general she cares about us. Would take again!
She is engaging and supportive, making it easy to grasp complex concepts.
pick a god and start praying
My theory is that this prof graduated from UCGPT (University of ChatGPT). There is simply no other explanation for the number of mistakes she makes during lectures and the sheer cluelessness she displays when teaching the content.
Class Info
Attendance Mandatory
5%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.67 avg changeRatings by Course
APSC-182
1.1
(91)Difficulty by Course
APSC-182
4.1