3.1

Andrew McWilliams

Chemistry - Toronto Metropolitan University

3.1
Quality
3.3
Difficulty
46%
Would Retake
114
Reviews
3.1
Quality
3.3
Difficulty
3.0
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

46%

Would Retake

114

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
114 total ratings

5

29

4

21

3

25

2

19

1

20

What Students Say

smartest man in the room

CHY103 - 5.0 rating

Horrible prof, goes through a chapter a week

CHY102 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

42%

Textbook Required

64%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 28 grades
Most common grades:
A- (7)
Not sure yet (6)
B+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(5)C(4)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(12)
Based on 36 reported grades
A-: 7
Not sure yet: 6
B+: 5
B: 5
Common Tags
Get ready to read (8)
Caring (5)
Test heavy (5)
Participation matters (4)
Lecture heavy (4)
Hilarious (3)
Inspirational (2)
Lots of homework (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.30 avg change
Nov
Dec
Jan
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHY339

5.0

(1)

CHY272

4.5

(2)

CHY152

4.0

(2)

CHY337

4.0

(4)

SOMECHYCOURSE

4.0

(1)
+8 more courses
Difficulty by Course

CHEM330

5.0

CHY15

5.0

CHEMISTRY

5.0

CHY272

4.0

CHY211

4.0

Reviews (113)
4.0
3.0
CHY102
Sep 3, 2003

he's a new prof seems like a nice person

5.0
2.0
CHY102
Sep 16, 2003

Good Prof, jokes are crazy cheesy but good prof

3.0
4.0
CHY102
Sep 25, 2003

I wont make fun of appearences cause it does not matter. but he has cheesy jokes which nobody gets lol but he is pretty good, knows his stuff except he goes through slides faster than monkeys go through bananas! Good Prof, Go McWilliams!

2.0
2.0
CHY102
Nov 14, 2003

No Comments

1.0
2.0
CHY102
Nov 25, 2003

No need to attend class, he copies Heyd's notes but still finds ways to make mistakes. To McWilliam: Stop screwing with students, you terrible excuse for a teacher.

3.0
3.0
CHY102
Dec 12, 2003

In lectures, I don't think he cares. However, if you go to him for extra help during his office hours, he does know his stuff and you can learn alot. The bad part is that he makes jokes and laughs at them, when they are not necessarily, laughable. :/

1.0
2.0
CHY102
Dec 29, 2003

His teaching is garbage, but first year students should have no problems because course is based on grade 11 material + some grade 12 equilibrium

1.0
3.0
CHY102
Jan 1, 2004

this teacher is BORING...he takes his notes from another prof and reads straight off of them as if they were self-explanatory. i didn't even bother going to classes because they just weren't worth it, i'd rather sleep.

4.0
4.0
CHY272
Apr 8, 2004

killed us on our midterm.

5.0
4.0
CHY272
Apr 15, 2004

solid understanding of course material, excellent communication skills. failed to cover 1 subject, left it up to the class. very reasonable man, easy to approach 1 on 1.

4.0
3.0
CHY102
Apr 17, 2004

i like him coz he admitted when he made mistakes.. but not very clear when explaining the notes

3.0
5.0
CHY152
May 12, 2004

He's an Okay once you get to know him outside of class. His tests are real tough and uses coins to hold down his slides. Overall an okay guy but hard teacher.

4.0
3.0
CHY337
Jun 24, 2004

I thought he was one of the friendliest profs I have ever met. I thought he was very reasonably and very real. I thought he was very intelligent and he wasn't intimidating. I thought he was very helpful.

4.0
2.0
CHY102
Oct 27, 2004

This class is hard to attend. I dont see anything wrong with the prof. but it is just material we covered last year. If you dont attend you have to possibility of falling behind.

5.0
2.0
CHY337
Oct 29, 2004

Class material is a bit dry to teach, but also very hard to make it interesting. Fair and real prof. - always in his office during office hours

5.0
3.0
CHY102
Dec 13, 2004

It's not McWilly's fault, but it's hard to make chemistry interesting to 200 students sitting on comfy chairs in a pitch black auditorium. He's a good guy though, always tries to tie in BEER to his lectures. The Lectures are online, so you dont NEED to attend class.

3.0
3.0
CHY102
Dec 28, 2004

useless. reads powerpoint available on blackboard. the course was mostly review anyway

1.0
2.0
CHY102
Dec 31, 2004

Even I can read out power point slides....don't go to lectures, all you need is to download the lectures from blckbrd...for me he is like air...was not helpfull at all...

3.0
3.0
CHY102
Jan 2, 2005

God I can't hardly understand the things he is explaining to us. He is there for help but what he explains is all from the lecture notes. What kind of teaching is that he can't teach at all plus that means he can't hardly help and give right solutions to problems which is hardly similar to the tests

5.0
2.0
CHY152
Jan 30, 2005

Judging from the blank stares I see every day in this class, it is clearly NOT the prof who needs improvement. I find him totally clear, but then, I do the hmwk and am not a dolt, like the majority of the ppl sitting in the class. Totally fair and helpful prof.

3.0
4.0
CHY102
Mar 6, 2005

I may be biased for my hatred of chemistry. This course was new to me, and i found there was too much material to cover. His lectures are powerpoint doesn't properly cover examples in detail. Forced to drop. On the otherhand he's very approachable and seems to care how you're doing.

3.0
3.0
CHY
Mar 11, 2005

boring boring boring.. or probably it's just the course

4.0
3.0
CHY102
Apr 19, 2005

Great prof. Always available to help students during office hours.

1.0
4.0
CHY102
Nov 15, 2005

he is a huge ****!!!

2.0
2.0
CHY102
Dec 2, 2005

ZZZzzzzZZZZzzzz.....what? is it over already? Man, that was some good 2-hour sleep. And that, my friends, what happened on every lecture. Sure he's nice and respects students, but MAN it's boring there. Probably cuz he just reads off his slides all the time...

4.0
3.0
CHY102
Dec 6, 2005

People think that he has dull lectures and sleep through it, but its not the class, its the time the classes are held. Either Early in the morning or late in the evening, both times when people are too tired to pay attention. He's a nice guy, is helpful when you have a problem, and understands what the students are going through.

5.0
4.0
CHY102
Dec 30, 2005

The course starts easy, gets hard at the end. His test questions are EVIL. But Very approachable, always in his office for office hours and always willing to schedule appointments. Lecture notes are thorough, and he's a fair marker. Not to Acess Center Students, this guy is completely flexible and helpful.

3.0
2.0
CHY102
Dec 31, 2005

I have to agree that his class is boring but at least he cared about students, compared to other TAs, all they cared about was their money, but at least he really cared about his students, the only thing I found unhelpful was that when you ask him a question he hardly writes the answer down, all he does is make verbal sentence or phrases which is g

5.0
3.0
CHY102
Jan 3, 2006

was a very good prof...well done

5.0
1.0
CHY102
Jan 23, 2006

He's a cool guy, his online notes are quite helpful and if u just follow up with him you'll be ok, he's not that boring in class as many other teachers are, which is a real good thing...

4.0
3.0
SOMECHYCOURSE
Apr 15, 2006

McWilli is a cool guy..kinda like the "greaser" type. He's tests are real tricky but he gives good practice questions. The lectures are long and draining but he makes an effort by adding life-related examples to make it more interesting...it still doesn't take away the boredom or LONG length of the lecture. He also gives great lecture notes.

4.0
3.0
CHY102
Jun 28, 2006

long lengthy lectures, everything he asks in the exam is practically in the lectures.more attention to lectures and you'll do fine.

5.0
3.0
CHY337
Sep 6, 2006

okay so he could slim the waste band, but he's interesting, if you're in chem, you better be there for the right reasons, because if you are the course is not hard, and offers alot of understanding about organic chem and defining or discovering chemicals/compounds.

1.0
5.0
CHY102
Sep 19, 2006

oh man... i never thought someone's jokes could be soo bad that it makes u cry!!

4.0
4.0
CHY102
Nov 7, 2006

This guy is kind of a quandary when it comes to his class. He's great with outlining to us exactly what we need to know and how to use examples correctly. As well, his clicker questions let us see how exactly to do stuff in a timed environment which is great practice. However, there are no TA's, and no tutorials so gotta learn on your own.....

5.0
1.0
CHY102
Nov 15, 2006

No Comments

4.0
2.0
CHY102
Jan 1, 2007

One of those profs that cares about students. He has to teach all the engineers so cant really give much individual attention. Lots of opportunities to get easy marks and I knew a couple people that didnt even need to take the exam to pass the class.Lectures are insanely boring and normally I'd skip a class like this but clicker questions are bonus

5.0
2.0
CHY102
Jan 19, 2007

i never liked chem nor will i ever enjoy it, but he teaches it well and keeps the pace up. too bad it was a course for engineers so 100% of the course was review from grade 12. dont buy the text, its useless.

1.0
5.0
CHEM330
Feb 25, 2007

He is currently teaching CHY330. I prefer he find some other job than teaching this course. He does not know how to teach this course. I waste my tution fee and time by learning this course from him. How ever, the note he post on Ryerson blackboard are excellent and possibly they are not him.

2.0
3.0
CHY337
Apr 10, 2007

If you don't do it his way you get a really bad grade. Just make sure you pay attension to get his way

5.0
1.0
CHY102
Jun 26, 2007

Very, very, VERY good prof and a good man. He realized the majority of his students weren't in chemical engineering, thus paid no attention to lectures and thus were about to fail. Instead of getting offended at our insult to chemistry, he decided to allow us to pass the course on the condition we pass the final. Hence my C. Very grateful, McWilli!

4.0
4.0
CHY211
Aug 22, 2007

he's a nice teacher, just don't break the rules in his class.

4.0
1.0
CHY102
Oct 6, 2007

He knows his stuff, but most of the time he just reads off the ppt....to be quite honest, the only reason why i go to his lectures is because of those clicker questions =p

2.0
2.0
CHY102
Nov 30, 2007

I liked Chemistry before I came to his lectures. He made me hate it ! His classes are useless , u come just to get a bonus for the clicker questions, the entire chemistry courses was based on self-studying and huge hatred to him,his useless teaching and stupid assignments. I hope he reads it!

4.0
3.0
CHY051
Dec 18, 2007

he's a good prof if you really listen to his lectures.

1.0
5.0
CHY102
Mar 12, 2008

choose another prof if you have the option!

1.0
4.0
CHY102
May 15, 2008

I still don't understand why we had this chemistry prof. - The whole book was read without his help.

1.0
5.0
CHY102
Sep 28, 2008

This guy is a joke. All he does is read off of the powerpoint. I could just skip every lecture, read the textbook myself and I would learn more than watching him attempt to explain important concepts. Pick another prof - any other prof if you have the chance.

3.0
1.0
CHY102
Jan 6, 2009

took this class in 07' and had it on Mon. and Fri. mornings. fell asleep most of time and me and ma friend took turns wakin each other up just for the clicker questions. the prof? he knows his stuff but does not kno how to deliver it. other than that, tests and exams weren't that bad.

5.0
2.0
CHY102
Jan 8, 2009

lookin at previous comments on him i dunno but i think hes changed. hes hilarious and taught really well and makes it very interestin. started likin chemistry cuz of him and nnow takin chemical engineering cuz of it. overall cool guy.

5.0
2.0
CHY102
Feb 4, 2009

He teaches alright. Lectures can get really boring at times, but he does do a good job at explaining stuff. If you pay attention in his class and don't fall asleep, you should get most of what he's saying.

2.0
5.0
CHY102
Oct 5, 2009

unfortunately this guy doesn't know how to teach and make his subject easy... he would know his lectures and subject but that doesn't mean everybody in his class should know everything. he is not a teacher at all. his lecture notes does not make any informational or organizational sense.i wouldn't stay his lectures if we dont have clicker questions

5.0
3.0
CHY102
Nov 2, 2009

An excellent professor. People may dislike him for not letting them enter class - sounds reasonable, considering one lecture is only an hour long.. less even. What is the point of coming to class if you are 40 minutes late, with 10 minutes to spare? Reasonable. He is VERY clear, easy to approach, and overall seems like a nice guy. Funny too.

5.0
1.0
CHY102
Nov 9, 2009

He is a great awsome all around guy! He told me not to read lectures or textbook just do as many questions as fast you can!

3.0
3.0
CHY102
Nov 12, 2009

Very arrogant, hard to approach if you need help. Comes off as very smug. If you need help be prepared,otherwise if you don't have a clue about a certain topic he will make you feel like an idiot for bringing it up.

5.0
3.0
CHY102
Dec 7, 2009

HE IS GOOD

2.0
4.0
CHY102
Jan 10, 2010

Prof. Drew's take on this course is only to make students get into the habit of answering exam questions in 3 mins or less and as a result, he blazes through vague lecture notes. He transitions from being very helpful to being extremely rude on the fly. Unfortunately, ENG students are stuck with him for the most part.

3.0
5.0
CHY102
Jul 11, 2010

VERY HARD PROF...HE MAKES THE CHEM VERY HARD TO STUDENTS....OVERALL NOT A VERY GOOD PROF

3.0
5.0
CHY102
Jul 11, 2010

HE MADE CHEM VERY HARD ....NOT HELPFUL AT ALL...

3.0
4.0
CHY102
Aug 17, 2010

Hes a pretty rude guy and he BLAZES through his slides. Dont bother asking questions, he will make you look stupid. His tests are SUPER HARD but you cant avoid it, do the online homework and read the text/his notes and you will do fine, he usually bellcurves anyways

3.0
3.0
CHY102
Dec 3, 2010

well, his test basically is out of his lecture notes and the book is totally useless I spend lots of time on the book which was useless! his exams are full of tricks and the tricks not relevant to chemistry at all! the classes are extremely crowded and he doesn't care about the student at all!

2.0
5.0
CHY15
Nov 8, 2011

boring and races to fast in notes

2.0
4.0
CHY102
Dec 10, 2011

Horrible prof, goes through a chapter a week. doesnt explain well.. You have no choice though so to have him..

5.0
3.0
CHY102
Dec 30, 2011

Good CHemistry teacher, loud and clear. However tests sometimes contained material not covered in class.

4.0
4.0
CHY102
Jan 9, 2012

Not too bad. Lectures weren't very helpful, since he would only do a few examples that were relevant. Second midterm was really difficult.

5.0
3.0
CHY102
Oct 4, 2012

One of the best profs at Ryerson. He is very clear and makes the material interesting. The second test is very difficult our year had a very low average. However, overall the evaluations are fair.

2.0
4.0
CHY102
Dec 5, 2012

Very very dense course, I took it as an elective (stupid) and just didn't have the time to dedicate to it as much as I needed to. Not sure at all how I feel about the prof though -- sometimes he was very funny and engaging, and sometimes he was downright rude and extremely condescending. I'd probably recommend another prof for the course.

5.0
5.0
CHY102
Dec 7, 2012

good prof, course is very hard, tests are not usually covered by the material in class. lectures are interactive and entertaining.

4.0
5.0
CHY103
Dec 8, 2012

Helpfulness is neither excessive nor insufficient. Is careful to use proper terminology and good logical flow for explanations. Tests are much harder than the lecture material. spend more time on textbook questions over watching lecture material. More graphically represented problems, practice these if they are in the suggested questions.

5.0
2.0
CHY102
Dec 14, 2012

Great prof. He teaches the course very well. Had him for CHY102, and yes his lecture notes do not cover all the materials in the textbook, however, you can go through the book yourself. I noticed most of the test questions came directly from the examples and practice questions in the textbook. so do those and you will do great.

1.0
5.0
CHY102
Jan 3, 2013

The worst prof i have had!!! he is very neurotic prof i have ever seen during his office hours and after exams

1.0
5.0
CHY102
Grade: A
Sep 2, 2013

Horrible teacher! Don't be late, won't let you in! I'm not sure he even knows what he's teaching, seems lost at times. SWITCH to a different prof if you can, it will be the best decision you ever make!

3.0
3.0
CHY103
Nov 10, 2013

Bearable, but not recommended. Very knowledgeable, but not great at transferring this knowledge to students--goes too fast and doesn't explain in a way that is easy to grasp. Very, very unpleasant personality. I spent a lot of time with the textbook and got a great mark but I will not be looking back at CHY103 fondly...

2.0
4.0
CHY102
Grade: A-
Aug 4, 2014

Mostly reads off his slides. He records all of his lectures so attendance is not mandatory. If you review the slides and use the text book, you should be fine.

1.0
5.0
CHY103
Dec 31, 2014

Useless lectures, doesn't show how to go about finding a solution to a question. Midterms marked very hard. Useless textbook, practice problems provide no help with what is tested. The simplest examples are done in lecture while the hardest are put on the midterms and exams. Avoid this prof and pick another one! Clicker participation counts!

4.0
4.0
CHY103
Grade: B+
Jan 8, 2015

Hate the fact that if your in computer science or math you need to take a chem, bio, physics... But anyways I only went to the class just for stupid clicker marks. He records his lectures so that you can always watch them later if you missed something.. which you will.

4.0
5.0
CHEMISTRY
Jan 12, 2015

His lectures are very clear, although he isn't the best of the Ryerson chem profs his lecture were still very helpful to me and he also posts skeleton notes and the recorded lecture online. I enjoyed his chem lectures although his marking is extremely hard, you should definitely study his notes!

5.0
2.0
CHY339
May 5, 2015

Amazing lecturer. His knowledge in the course was great. They are recorded and posted in case you missed something. Textbook was mandatory but could be used on all evaluations. Weekly assignments aided in studying and further understanding the material. Interesting topics were covered that you will use as you further your education in chemistry.

5.0
5.0
CHY103
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 2, 2018
Would take again

smartest man in the room

Caring
5.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A
Nov 26, 2018
Would take again

He likes to pull some jokes here and there to make up for the material that can be dry at times. It is best to go to class as there are iClickers (free marks!) and fill-in-the blanks. He also goes through different examples that are helpful to complete textbook problems, which are in turn very useful for preparing for midterms and final exams. :)

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A
Dec 6, 2019
Would take again

really awesome prof, posts recorded lectures for days that you're sick or just lazy to go to school, lectures help clarify concepts, he walks you through many problems

Inspirational
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
CHY103
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 11, 2019
Would take again

You can tell he genuinely cares about his students. Lectures are posted online but it's better to attend lecture and follow along with him as it will help solidify your knowledge in the course. Super easy first midterm, harder second midterm and final. However, if you review frequently you'll get an A+ easily. A true blessing!

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Caring
3.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A+
Dec 26, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Lectures can be dry and confusing at some points, and he goes through concepts pretty quickly. Read the textbook and DO THE PROBLEMS!!

1.0
4.0
CHY103
Grade: Rather not say
May 6, 2020
Wouldn't take again

As someone who loves chemistry, this guy was the worst. Tries to be funny but his jokes r so lame. His lectures r so dry have to be in class because of clickers questions solved in class were so basic. I attempted all Q'S from textbook but IDK WHERE THEy got their questions from!! no matter how much practice u do it was not enough. SWITCH NOW!

Participation matters
Test heavy
4.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A+
Dec 18, 2020
Would take again

To be honest, I don't really have anything fantastic or horrible to say about him. He met my expectation of a professor. His quizzes were fair game. His test were fair game. His assignments were mark-boosters. I truly hope we cross paths again.

Lecture heavy
5.0
4.0
CHY103
Grade: A+
Jan 18, 2021
Would take again

Lectures are amazing he explains everything in depth and goes step by step. If you only watch the lectures you wont do so good, you have to do the textbook questions!!!!

3.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A-
Dec 23, 2021
Wouldn't take again

The jokes were lame, and he doesn't really know how to explain concepts that well. He word vomits a lot, so that's a bit distracting. The second midterm was challenging, but the exam was easy. Not bad, but I would prefer another prof over this one.

5.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A-
Dec 25, 2021
Would take again

Overall a great prof. While his lecture videos aren't too great compared to Noel George's videos, they served as secondary means to study and prepare for the quizzes and tests. I suggest studying the Mastering Chemistry and textbook questions as they prepare you well for the written evaluations. Also the Molecules Along Us project is TA dependent.

Respected
Get ready to read
Participation matters
3.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A-
Dec 26, 2021
Would take again

He's just mid. Nothing really to complain about, nothing really to be looking forward to either.

2.0
4.0
CHY103
Grade: A-
Mar 7, 2022

Did not enjoy his lectures. It took a long time for him to get to the point and when he did, it was still very confusing :( Did not do well on the sections he taught.

3.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A-
Jul 16, 2022
Would take again

Three tests and an exam with a bunch of assignments on top of that. Weekly Zoom problem take up with a group quiz at the end. One of the assignments is basically an art project, good if you're talented, and bad if you're not. Most lectures are taught through bland prerecorded videos.

Group projects
Lots of homework
Test heavy
3.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: B
Nov 30, 2022

Dr. McWilliams is ok. He's not a professor which will make you hate the course or bring more challenges to getting a good grade. Its just that there are better profs than him (ex: Dr. George or Dr. Ghoshdastidar) who just make him look worse than he actually is. His lectures can be found dull which is the worst part.

4.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: B
Dec 2, 2022
Would take again

He gives good lectures and I was able to understand a lot of the material just by going to class. Lots of reviews are harsh bc they compare him to Dr George who is very expressive and out-there. But if you study each chapter and do practice questions each week, and don't fall behind, you should do better than I did.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
2.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 17, 2022

Yeah, choose Noel George instead. He rushes through the slides and dosen't explain any of the math problems. He expects you to go back to the recording later on AND LEARN HOW TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM YOURSELF. Cause of this no point in going to his lectures. Even though he does have office hours, he is not helpful and makes you even more confused.

Get ready to read
3.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A
Dec 22, 2022

dr mcwilliams was OK. he kinda rushed through the material and expected you to figure out the calculations by yourself. he spent too much time cracking mediocre jokes and not enough time addressing difficult concepts. overall, though, you can definitely manage to get a good grade with professor mcwilliams, especially if you have a chem background

Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: B+
Jan 11, 2023
Would take again

Lectures are okay, and goes thru content fast so be sure to read often to be up to date. The tests are trickier than you think so study hard.

Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
5.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: C+
Jan 30, 2023
Would take again

He helped me out a lot. Go to him and talk to him if you are struggling and he will give you all of his support. He is wonderful. Thanks prof.

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Caring
2.0
4.0
CHY103
Grade: C+
Aug 1, 2023

Lectures are ok. Textbook homework problems do not help with exams. Only study using past exams that they upload, some exam questions are pretty much copy and pasted form past exams.

1.0
5.0
CHY103
Mar 28, 2024

Lectures are very hard to listen to, does not really explain questions done in the lectures that well.

2.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: Incomplete
Sep 26, 2024

Reads directly off of the slides, does not explain anything and rushes through the lectures.

2.0
4.0
CHY103
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 5, 2024

reads off slides, doesn't really explains his steps, skips steps better to learn on your own

4.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: C+
Dec 4, 2024
Would take again

I really like his slides, he has added step by steps on how to solve each problem. He does start to skip steps though and assumes we know how he got to the answer. He really cares though! He goes out of his way to post helpful things and he's very approachable. I felt bad because nobody ever laughed at his jokes!

EXTRA CREDIT
Caring
2.0
3.0
CHY103
Dec 17, 2024

in lectures he "explains" the topics as if he's just talking to himself, not a class of 200 300 kids. his lectures r pointless, I would recommend the textbook to explain the concepts in more depth as he does do a great job during lectures.

3.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: A-
Dec 20, 2024
Would take again

Teaches up to standard; knows the content very well, gives "quizzes" to check your understanding (usually not found on slides but his explanations regarding these are very helpful), and slides are easy to follow. As a person, he is quite annoying, lowkey hella passive-aggressive, and his "chuckles" are almost infuriating but maybe thats js me hatin

EXTRA CREDIT
Clear grading criteria
Accessible outside class
2.0
2.0
CHY102
Grade: B
Dec 28, 2024
Would take again

He was ok, i didn't like his lectures because he would just skip to the example question answers and not work through them, and I feel like he was really condescending and got mad easily. I had to study aloot outside of class.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
1.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: B+
Jan 17, 2025

Reads straight off slides, and is extremely passive aggressive. I would highly recommend taking the course with Noel George…

1.0
5.0
CHY103
Grade: B
Jan 29, 2025

Dr. Andrew McWilliams is a very kind man. His jokes kept us up early in the morning. However, Dr. Andrew McWilliams is paid to only read off slides. He doesn't even show how he arrived at the answer like Dr. Noel George does. He provides recordings, which others don't. However, I wouldn't take him again because it's hard to learn on your own.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
Hilarious
3.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: B
Jan 30, 2025
Would take again

Lectures are decent, but the exams are tricky. Study past tests and use unstuck AI for prep - it really helped me stay on top of the material.

2.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: C-
Apr 24, 2025

mcwilliams doesn't care about helping his students. i tried asking him a simple question once and he wouldn't even look at me while he was talking. he cracks random jokes throughout his lectures and reads off the slides the whole time without even walking you through the problems. always choose dr george over any other first year chem profs!!

Get ready to read
2.0
4.0
CHY103
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 18, 2025

not much patience and occasionally rude, needed to study outside of class to understand material. you can still get a good grade if you have him, but you'll need to work more for it.

Lecture heavy
3.0
2.0
CHY103
Grade: B+
Nov 29, 2025

You are provided skeleton notes you could fill out during lecture. He records his lecture and his presented slides are filled out, however, he gets mad if he catches you taking a picture of his slides, so if you miss something you have to wait until the end of the week to review what you've missed.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Caring
1.0
3.0
CHY103
Grade: B+
Dec 13, 2025

READ OFF SLIDES, his slides weren't helpful at all, his lectures were so time wasting I didn't go to his lectures after the midterm instead I went to George's , highly recommend .

1.0
4.0
CHY103
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 14, 2025

not good whatsoever. many awkward moments in lecture because of his anger outburst (student walking in 5 minutes late or taking a photo of the slides). could barely hear him although i sat infront (lots of mumbling then random joke is made). dont recommend but a good grade is possible if you self study.

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

42%

Textbook Required

64%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 28 grades
Most common grades:
A- (7)
Not sure yet (6)
B+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(5)C(4)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(12)
Based on 36 reported grades
A-: 7
Not sure yet: 6
B+: 5
B: 5
Common Tags
Get ready to read (8)
Caring (5)
Test heavy (5)
Participation matters (4)
Lecture heavy (4)
Hilarious (3)
Inspirational (2)
Lots of homework (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.30 avg change
Nov
Dec
Jan
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHY339

5.0

(1)

CHY272

4.5

(2)

CHY152

4.0

(2)

CHY337

4.0

(4)

SOMECHYCOURSE

4.0

(1)
+8 more courses
Difficulty by Course

CHEM330

5.0

CHY15

5.0

CHEMISTRY

5.0

CHY272

4.0

CHY211

4.0

Similar Professors