boring class. waste of time. do not take

Doesn't know how to calculate grades. Is unclear about assignments. Is unclear when answering questions and VERY VERY RUDE!!!!! Not an ethical person, not sure why he is an ethics prof.

Horrible class, horrible person.

Horrible, he is unclear, doesn't explain much very well, grading is terrible, the homework is confusing. Typing two pages for every class and not even having it collected is dumb. He's very rude, and hard to understand.

The worst professor I ever had. Big disappointment being a philosophy major. It is unethical for him to so called teach any longer.

He is a funny guy and seems very nice but i must say his class is not interesting. His answers to your questions are only answered 50% of the way....the test is dumb a quator of a sheet of paper for an essay & that is your grade? :( wish he taught bet

This instructor is horrible. He does not lecture, instead he forces students to ask questions so that he can answer them, and he does not provide a clear answer. think of asking a question about how to ride a bike and being told how to raise a kid. Its that bad. Would not recommend Him to anyone

No Comments

Plain and simple: the man is an outstanding mind. However, his inability to speak the language, relate with students, teach, and explain concepts truly limit him as a teacher. He was meant to be a thinker…not a teacher.

No Comments

He just can not teach.

No Comments

HE has never answered one question friggen question. He contridicts himself on a regular basis, and does a great job at confusing his students. Im a supported of equal opportunity employees, but you gotta be able to teach. This class is a joke.

I hated him!!! I have never wasted more money on a class than this one..he did not answer anyones questions and literally makes no sense when he talks. He is not clear in his expectations for the class or tests.. advice is to never take him for any class if you want to pass.

very hard to understand. doesn't answer anyone's questions, about anything. test are nearly impossible. be ready to have a 2 page summary over every reading even though he may never collect it, like in my class.

very difficult to understand when discussing material. required 2-page typed summary for every class period, which is a waste of paper and time.

He never answers questions, and requires that students read things he never discusses. he also contradicts himself, and refuses to say what will be on the tests. avoid if at all possible

He does not collect the summaries often and there is no need to buy the book because you can get away without having to read it. He grades his essay tests very hard and only lets you use one page of a blue book to write you response which is not enough space. I atteneded every class and still ended up with a C+. Horrible ethics teacher!!

This is a nice man outside of the classroom, but in the classroom. he is confusing. requires you to write a two page summary for each class but he doesnt always collect every class period. So its a waste of paper, ink and time. Says he's going to go over certain stuff, but doesnt. I would not recommend him as a teacher.

WARNING! I took this professor for an online class, despite hearing bad things. I should of taken the advice to stay away from him. Not only does he never answer questions with an actual answer, he never makes sense and doesn't explain anything well. I worked my tail off for this impossible class- it's only impossible because he makes it that way..

He tries to trick you about assignments on springboard & will not answer your. questions. not a good teacher at all

I am a passive evaluator, however Mr. Stypinksi should be removed from any position of influence. This man has zero accessibility for his students. While his syllabus claims each student should be able to commit no less than 12 hours a week in addition to class time, he seems to be able to commit ZERO for his students. Take ANY other professor.

Gets off topic quick and stays off for a long time. Doesn't answer students' questions - he'll tell a irreverent story for 20 minutes and move on. In an ethics class, I think the teacher should argue his point if a student doesn't agree. Andrew just tells you your wrong and moves on. Its an easy, boring class. Just write what he wants to hear.

This man shouldn't be allowed to teach. Period. He makes philosophy out be nothing more than the verification of Christian dogma. He disgusted me with his comments about non-Christian thinkers and philosophers. He rambles on and on spouting useless garbage. Don't take ANY of his classes, if you want a real education.

Do NOT take this guys class, ALL of the negative comments below are absolutely true. He will make you read 60 page out of the book for homework, then when it comes time to discuss it he will only talk about cocaine or his childhood. This is after the first 20 minutes of him randomly asking people if they brought their book or syllabus. AVOID HIM!!!

DO NOT TAKE ANY OF HIS CLASSES!! All he does he go off on tangents about his youth, cocaine, and Chef-Boy-R-Dee. He assigns 80 page readings for homework, and then in the discussions goes off on his tangents again. Completely useless class and an epic waste of my time.

He's a terrible teacher. He talks about his love of cocain and p0rn0graphy. He also talks about stealing cars at night and stolen diamond rings. He also is very hard to understand. He spends most of class asking who's missing or who moved their seat. And he rarely teaches anything at all. He answers questions with riddles... don't take the class..

Good Luck. Super Sweet Guy. It's the 3rd week I am so confused and so behind and I have been to every single class. Good Luck Again.

Where to begin? I was completely lost from the beginning. He follows to syllabus precisely but he is so hard to follow. He tells you to take notes in class but he will stand in front of the class the entire time and just goes on rants about nothing that pertains to the class.If you ever try to disagree with him, you will be wrong. Don't take him.

He is a nice guy but is at many times incomprehensible. His lectures often get side tracked by personal rants and he becomes preachy at times. His tests and projects are easy though and getting an A is not difficult. But expect to lose hair if you try to relate his lectures to graded work.

He drops a decent amount of quizzes and HWs. Communication is terrible with him, and his accent doesn't help you understand him any better. He is very slow with grading and is extremely old-fashioned. He didn't update his dates in Brightspace from previous semesters. Confusing and hard to work with. Causes unnecessary stress and unreasonably strict

This was by far THE WORST PROFESSOR I HAVE EVER HAD. I took his online Intro to Ethics class; and he was just awful. The syllabus is basically his lesson plans and you are left to figure it all out. There were LENGTHY discussions, 4 homework papers due a week and if you need help, don't even bother asking him. THE WORST PROFESSOR.

His quiz questions rarely make sense, and he is not very clear with what he wants to see in the essays. There are 2 one-paragraph essays due every week on top of the readings, quizzes, discussions, and exams. Attendance is mandatory but his lectures have lots of irrelevant tangents and aren't structured. He also has issues dealing with technology.

This has honestly be the worst professor I have ever had. I am currently taking Intro to Ethics online with him right now, and I really advise you stay away from the online version if you have to take him. He won't answer emails until a week after, his dates on BS were wrong, he never makes sense which makes philosophy harder. Just terrible.

His online class is a complete mess. He is tough to get a hold of via electronic communication and will only give you short couple-word answers. There are a lot of assignments but he barely keeps the grades for most of them. His exams are question essays with no option for partial credit. The exams are always 100% or 0%.

It is kryptonite for him to give a 100% on anything. Very grumpy and if you do not give him an answer exactly the way he wants god bless. If you call the sky blue he will correct you because sometimes the sky appears to be orange at sunset, so blue is wrong in his mind. No slides, just a 40-50 minute session of him talking about pointless stories.

This class can get annoying immediately. Lectures are all over the place, he just seems old and distracted. After a minute you will be able to understand what he expects. Just do all of the homework, reflective essays, discussion posts, etc. Even if you don't know what you're talking about, try and sound like you do. Everything is on the syllabus.

Literally cannot use a computer. Wastes valuable class time trying to use a computer, or just by rambling about unrelated subjects. Numerous times, important information was simply never disclosed, as he could not figure out how to post it online. Computer Literacy should be mandatory for college professors, and Dr. Stypinski is exactly why.

Honestly, as far as teaching skills, this guy has NONE. He's like 80+ years old, and thinks he's hot stuff. The course itself was not that difficult, although he'll spend 1/3 of the lecture time telling you to work hard. If you complete the quizzes, short response assignments, and go to his review lectures before the exams you will do great.

He is the WORST! Workload is ridiculous, never answer emails promptly. Most of the time, he either doesn't answer the question or he's rude with his answer. I asked him a question and pointed out something in the syllabus that may have been incorrect, but really just needed an answer to my question. All he had to say was "congratulations"

Do not take his course if you aren't really passionate about ethics like he is. At times I thought he was speaking in riddles because he was so confusing. His grading also doesn't make sense. Overall don't take it but at least you don't have to write any long papers