2.9

Anthony Nield

Psychology - York University - Keele Campus

2.9
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
126
Reviews
2.9
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
3.0
Helpful
2.7
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

126

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

25

4

23

3

27

2

30

1

21

What Students Say

Doesn't post on moodle

3260 - 4.0 rating

The exams were alright though

PSYC2210 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

0%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

59% confidence
Based on 3 grades
Most common grades:
Drop/Withdrawal (1)
A- (1)
C (1)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(0)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 4 reported grades
Drop/Withdrawal: 1
A-: 1
C: 1
A: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.66 avg change
Feb
Mar
Apr
Jul
Sep
Feb
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

1010

5.0

(1)

10102020

5.0

(1)

20202210

5.0

(1)

PSY2020

5.0

(1)

PSYC4170

5.0

(1)
+35 more courses
Difficulty by Course

20202210

5.0

PSYCH1010

5.0

PSYCH2110

5.0

PSYCHMOTI

5.0

COGNITIVEPSYCH

5.0

Reviews (126)
2.0
5.0
PSYC2020
Jul 30, 2001

oh dear god this man is so boring!

2.0
5.0
LEARNING
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Dec 19, 2001

Terrible, he is terribly boring and his exams are brutally hard.

4.0
4.0
PSYC2020
Feb 4, 2002

No Comments

3.0
4.0
2210
Feb 4, 2002

The nicest man, but, yes, his lectures were boring!

4.0
4.0
2020
Feb 13, 2002

super nice guy - but sometimes he goes off on tangents!

3.0
3.0
PSYC2210
Feb 26, 2002

took him for learning, tests were fair, a bit lengthy, and yes, boring lectures

4.0
3.0
PSYC2210
Mar 18, 2002

Very friendly guy, approachable, tends to go off on tangents

5.0
4.0
MOTIVATION
Mar 18, 2002

can you say MONOTONE?

5.0
3.0
PSYC2120
Mar 22, 2002

He is so NOT boring!! Really great teacher - one of my faves!

4.0
5.0
LEARNING
Mar 28, 2002

Brilliant, but BORING! extremely informative, but difficult course

1.0
5.0
PSYCH2020
Apr 4, 2002

Horrible and B O R I N G

3.0
4.0
LEARNING
Apr 5, 2002

No Comments

3.0
4.0
3260
Apr 12, 2002

He knows his stuff, but he is so BORING. Tests are very hard

3.0
5.0
PSYC1010
Jun 27, 2002

No Comments

3.0
4.0
2120
Jul 3, 2002

nice guy, but boring...he knows his stuff...hard tests...interesting course.

2.0
5.0
MOTIVATION
Jul 24, 2002

BORING - can we say cure for INSOMNIA....man if i didnt need those courses !

1.0
5.0
STATS
Aug 5, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
PSYCH1010
Aug 18, 2002

SO BORING!!! u will fall ASLEEP listening to him, worst teacher i've ever had!

5.0
3.0
PSYC1010
Sep 3, 2002

He is a GREAT teacher, very interesting, if you read before the lecture

5.0
3.0
1010
Sep 3, 2002

very nice prof, quizes you from the book

2.0
4.0
MOTIVATION
Sep 20, 2002

extremely boring, very difficult

5.0
4.0
STATS
Sep 25, 2002

Brilliant in his field; Boring; Extremely difficult exams (no m/c)

4.0
5.0
PSYCH2110
Oct 11, 2002

2 Tony Nields in psych dept-this one older and thinks he's funny-can be boring.

3.0
3.0
PSYC1010
Oct 31, 2002

No Comments

2.0
5.0
PSYC3260
Nov 13, 2002

ugh. a little funny at times, but so boring

2.0
3.0
COGNITION
Dec 9, 2002

Genius, boring lectures, hard exams

4.0
3.0
PSY1010
Dec 17, 2002

brilliant, wise and uniquely funny

2.0
5.0
PSYCH
Jan 8, 2003

Terrible. Dropped course with D. Got a B+ with another prof. Says something.

1.0
5.0
LEARNING
Jan 27, 2003

i don't want to hear about rats he did experiments on 30yrs ago! he's so DULL!

3.0
2.0
PSYC2210
Feb 24, 2003

Pretty easy, but really boring.

5.0
5.0
STATISTICS
Feb 27, 2003

He is a nice professor,however, very hard test and assingments.

5.0
1.0
STATS
Apr 6, 2003

Great prof. Sometimes boring but mostly funny :-)

3.0
4.0
COGNITION
Apr 8, 2003

Boring proff, hard exams, good text

3.0
3.0
LEARNING
Apr 12, 2003

A very nice man. This professor's tests/exams are difficult. It isn't good enough to just memorize the text/lecture material. You must be able to apply the information. Lectures are sometimes difficult to follow. I enjoyed his dry wit.

2.0
4.0
LEARNING
Apr 18, 2003

very boring. Exams were too hard

5.0
2.0
PSYC
Apr 27, 2003

One of the best professors I had. Exams are not difficult, just require studying. Surprise!!!

1.0
5.0
PSYCH1010
Apr 30, 2003

so hard, so borring, don't take

3.0
4.0
COGNITIVE
Jun 6, 2003

he may be a good prof, but im not convinced yet that he has a pulse. it was like listening to a dial tone.

2.0
4.0
PSYC2210
Jun 9, 2003

It was the only class that I was required to read the ENTIRE text book!!

1.0
5.0
COGNITION
Jun 18, 2003

this man should NOT be teaching!!! he is HORRIBLE, boring and his exams a JOKE!!! he has NO IDEA what is going on he just tells stories DO NOT take a course with him

5.0
5.0
20202210
Aug 20, 2003

Had 3 courses with him -- Stats, Learning, and Memory -- and despite what others say, I liked him! Give him a chance, he's not all that bad!

5.0
3.0
10102020
Sep 23, 2003

he is the nicest guy ever, I took 5 classes with him and got no grade lower than A

5.0
4.0
LEARNING
Dec 8, 2003

He is a very nice and helpful prof, his exams are a bit tough but he would adjust the grades if the class average was too low. Overall he is a good prof.

4.0
4.0
LEARNING
Dec 12, 2003

Very tough teacher. His exams are hard, but if you study a lot, you'll do fine. You really have to think hard, especially on the multiple choice because they can be worded in a tricky way. Very interesting prof, though. He has lots of funny stories.

5.0
4.0
LEARNING
Dec 15, 2003

very helpful and nice guy. His exams are kinda tough.

1.0
5.0
COGNITIVE
Dec 16, 2003

VERY HARD

5.0
2.0
PSY2020
Dec 30, 2003

very nice and helpfull proff

2.0
3.0
LEARNING
Feb 12, 2004

SNORE!!! Horribly boring man, monotone speech, very bland lecturer. His lectures were not relatively organized, he seemed to jump from thing to thing. This made note taking a very frusterating job.

1.0
5.0
PSYCHMOTI
Mar 23, 2004

what a bore Motivation was the class and i wasnt even motivated enough to open the textbook or try to stay awake in class

2.0
5.0
COGNITION
Grade: A-
Apr 1, 2004

tests/exams WAY too hard!!!

1.0
5.0
PSYC2210
Apr 21, 2004

Exams/tests were impossible and his lectures were very hard to sit through. Would often jump from topic to topic.

5.0
3.0
PSYC2210
Apr 22, 2004

He's a nice prof, but he's BORING. Tests are hard (but not his fault as TA's make up exams, so can't really blame him). You can do well though if you study, and he's so nice that he will adjusts marks for the class.

4.0
5.0
LEARNING
May 5, 2004

his lectures were interesting...his poor cat! the exams were insane though!! class average of a low C

1.0
5.0
MOTIVATION
May 6, 2004

worst prof i've ever had. Don't take his classes under no circumstances whatsoever.

3.0
5.0
STATS
Jun 7, 2004

good professor but VERY HARD but a wonderful person

3.0
5.0
COGNITION
Aug 11, 2004

Boring, boring, boring. Very unorganized lecturing. Hard tests.

1.0
5.0
STATS
Aug 11, 2004

worst prof I ever had

3.0
2.0
LEARNING
Sep 1, 2004

Great prof. Test were not too difficult but challenging enough to make you study. Great course, class avg in 2003-2004 was low C..but you can get an A+ just study...

1.0
5.0
COGNITION
Sep 10, 2004

All I can say is "WTF" - Class average was a "D" No one got anything higher than a D+ in this course. Do not take any courses with this man!! He is the most boring professor and not helpful; his TAs are even worse! Where do they get t

3.0
4.0
MOTIVATION
Sep 24, 2004

He knows his stuff that's true but he is the most BORING prof I had. He loves talking about animal experimets and drawing charts which makes class even more boring. And on the test he would ask you only about the stuff he likes so you can skip the rest

2.0
4.0
LEARNING
Oct 2, 2004

HORRIBLE!!!!! He managed to kill the material. He has way too many demands and expectations for a 2nd year course. One of those profs who love to see undergrads squirm. Tests were out of the world: questions on minor details (stats and reseracher names

2.0
4.0
PSYCH2210
Oct 5, 2004

drop it, drop it now! worst prof i have ever had...EVER!! MOST BORING LECTURES, EVEN WORSE EXAMS!! just chalk and black board for 3 horrible hours. get away while you can!!!

2.0
4.0
LEARNING
Oct 19, 2004

Don't even think about taking any course with him!!!!! He is the WORST prof ever. All he talks about are his mice and scribbles charts on the board. His tests are horrible and don't expect anything higher than a D+!!! If you dare take the course with him and fail... DON'T SAY I DIDN'T WARN YOU!!!!

5.0
3.0
PSYC4170
Oct 24, 2004

Assigned mini-assignments to prepare us for our final thesis - you won't find this with other profs teaching this course. Offered his opinion on our shortcomings during thesis proposals which was very beneficial -- class also contributed. Very fair, very thorough, very helpful. Excellent prof.

1.0
5.0
PSYC
Nov 23, 2004

worest prof ever;he doesn't explain ne thing;all my notes consisted of stupid graphs about beeps and tones. and hes obsessed with doing tests on cats??DO NOT ENROL OR U R GOING TO DROP OUT LIKE THE REST OF MY CLASS AND I!!!fyi

2.0
4.0
COGNTION
Dec 6, 2004

Very boring, difficult to understand

1.0
5.0
LEARNING
Dec 10, 2004

Seems nice, but honestly can't teach. Completly disorganized, nothing but his monotonous voice and pointless graph scribbles on the blackboard for 3hrs that never seem to end. Test questions on insignificant details.

2.0
5.0
LEARNING
Dec 13, 2004

His exams are ridiculously hard,don't waste your time and money. He's boring, thinks he's funny and all his lecture notes consits of tones and beeps. Just look at the comments left for him on this sight, need i say more.

5.0
2.0
COGNITION3260
Jan 5, 2005

I found him to be one of the best profs I've had. The stories of his experiments and life experiences are much more interesting than just listening to him reiterate what the text says. And I really don't think he writes on the board too much, he writes just enough.

5.0
3.0
LEARNING
Jan 18, 2005

This man knows his stuff. He has been in the field long enough to be incredibly knowledgeable, but not too long that he's burnt out and miserable.He is passionate and interesting to listen to.His real life experience is fascinating.And yes, psychology of learning is all to do with studies of animals

3.0
3.0
COGNITION
Jan 20, 2005

He knows his stuff but he is very boring. I can't count how many times i either fell asleep or left early

3.0
2.0
LEARNINGCOG
Jan 23, 2005

you actually have to put some effort into his classes. expects you to know the material very well and yes his tests are challenging but don't let this scare you. I got an A+ in learning & an A in cognition. His beeps & graphs are all to prove a point so listen! Read text & know experiments fr class.

2.0
5.0
LEARNING
Feb 16, 2005

Wish I found this page before enrolling. The lectures are extremely boring. I was ecstatic about this course, now I'm dreading getting the next few weeks! The professor is a very nice person, very knowledgeable, but he doesn't present the information well. He's not tech savy, no movies or anything..

2.0
5.0
LEARNING
Feb 22, 2005

Very boring course

1.0
3.0
STATS
Mar 27, 2005

He hasn't retired yet? god help those poor stats students

1.0
5.0
LEARNING
Apr 12, 2005

Very demanding for a second year Psychology course. Wish that the information was imparted in a more interesting manner. Try another professor.

2.0
5.0
LEARNING
Apr 26, 2005

the worst prof ever! so boring and always talks about the same experiments over and over again. monotone voice hard to listen to, and laughs at own jokes. i am usually a B+ student but got a C in this course after studying like crazy. if you get this prof run like there's no tomorrow.

1.0
5.0
STATS
Apr 28, 2005

If you didn't fall asleep in his class, you were one of the few. This prof is so dedicated to the textbook he treats it like the bible. He does not like answering questions in a way that students can understand.

4.0
4.0
STATISTICS
May 6, 2005

Although he is not exactly the most exciting professor I've ever had, he is extremly understanding and an amazing person. He is very approachable, and always makes time for his students. I can honestly say that I look forward to being in his Motivation class this summer.

5.0
4.0
LEARNING
May 26, 2005

The best university prof ever! He's the epitome of what a University professor should be -- engaged, knowledgeable, and fair.

1.0
5.0
PSYCH
Jun 5, 2005

He should RETIRE. VERY BAD PROF!! Can you say drop out fast!!!

3.0
1.0
STATS
Jun 29, 2005

His lectures are boring and useless..honestly just read the textbook on your own and you'll be fine. The tests are easy, just do the questions in the text and it's an easy A. The assignments (about 5 of them) are okay, some of the questions are tricky. I'd advise you to do the assignments in groups.

3.0
2.0
MOTIVATION
Aug 2, 2005

he is a really understanding prof and a very nice man but his lectures are just so incredibly boring....i can barely stay awake at times. He speaks in a very monotone voice and does not make his lectures very interesting....most of what he lectures about is in the text

3.0
2.0
MOTIVATION
Aug 3, 2005

Be prepared for the numerous amounts of stories he provides to validate his point. Boring - but that can be said about most psych classes. He's pretty fair, just stick with the text and you're fine.

2.0
4.0
MOTIVATION
Aug 9, 2005

Goodness! I'm sorry but he SHOULD retire! I did not stay awake in his class AT ALL. He puts select, random words on the board as he lectures. No structure whatsoever

3.0
3.0
PSYCH2030
Aug 16, 2005

Lots of stories. I did not find him TOO boring. Stick with the text and you will do well.

2.0
4.0
PSYCH
Sep 3, 2005

Brutal...

4.0
2.0
PSYCH2030
Oct 25, 2005

I like his lectures. Yes he does put random words on the board as he lectures but I actually understand. You just have to stay awake and listen. He does have a lot of stories and they can sometimes be quite amusing.

3.0
5.0
LEARNING
Dec 23, 2005

course itself is EASY! wen u read the text ull think u no it all but 1ce ur in the exam room ur pretty much skrewd! tests are v.HARD but he bellcurves!!lectures=random words on board! talks v.low,after breaktime u wont b able 2 stay up, only 2 exams in course 40mc,2 essays+3 definitions need 2 no names of millions of experimenter mentioned in txt!

4.0
1.0
PSYC2020
Jan 22, 2006

The guy is really nice, and he does help you if you are unsure about something. Also his tests are easy. Putting that aside, he is extremely boring, unclear, the textbook is horrible, and I've never met a guy who dances to a ringtone. If you do the work you'll be fine, but not the greatest prof

2.0
4.0
2020
Mar 29, 2006

What horrible prof! Learning is a great course, just dont take it with him - he'll bring the gpa down! Monotonous and never-ending lectures filled with gibberish information. Text book is good actually, but his tests dont seem to use either the notes or book consistently. Extremely poorly worded multiple choice questions. Don't take course with him

4.0
5.0
COGNITION
Apr 12, 2006

He looks nice, and talks a lot. But his exams are HARD. You never know what kind of essay questions he'll give you...he wants "essay" not "short answers"... you need to write lots and point to the topic directly otherwise no marks for it.

3.0
5.0
LEARNING
Apr 22, 2006

do not take this course! extremely hard tests and very boring lectures. seriously, don't take it.

3.0
5.0
COGNITION
Apr 30, 2006

Seems like a nice guy. A little outdated. Very hard course/exams.

5.0
2.0
PSYCHLEARNING
Jun 13, 2006

he is a very monotone lecturer.. but if u study their easy tests ... go by the textbook ... but i think he is areally nice guy and actually cares about his students and does not want to fail them ! if u go for help, he will help u out; if u do not show interest .. why should he ?

2.0
5.0
COGNITIVEPSYCH
Jul 27, 2006

Lectures are SoOOoOOOoO BORING!!! Exams are absolutely BRUTAL! you'll write only two exams in this class... 1st 45% and the 2nd 55%! hard essay questions... and expect 8 choices on each MC question! Screwed up my GPA :(

1.0
2.0
PSYC2020
Aug 14, 2006

Frustration. Horrible lecturing methods, tough text book, alright tests.

4.0
5.0
PSYC3260
Nov 30, 2006

OLD SCHOOL lecturer. Don't expect anything online or anywhere else. Lectures are essential, he knows that if you don't come you're screwed cause there will be multiple choice A-G or A-F if you're lucky. The tests require actual learning, unlike most other profs.

2.0
5.0
PSYC0000
Dec 1, 2006

Took him in learning really boring; only thing that goes around is rats and rats and rats. Very poorly and boring designed lectures, tough Exams where he gives out names and wants you to know them. The book ohhhhhh boring. Run away when you see his name.

4.0
3.0
PSYC3260
Jan 4, 2007

Is a monotonous lecturer but is willing to help you if you are willing to seek it. Much of the information is out of the text so the text is crucial. He does elaborate on it during his lectures. He can put you to sleep but he does have the best intentions. He's just old school.

3.0
4.0
PSYCH2020
Feb 20, 2007

I'm sure he means well...he's a nice guy but mannn, his class is awful...he moves too quickly and has u wondering 'where did that formula come from?' alll the time. if you're not a math person (like me) don't take stats with him!

4.0
3.0
LEARN1
Jun 8, 2007

prof nield is soooooooooo niceee .. one of the nicest most approachable teachers EVER .. but his lectures are VERY boring (dont attend) ..and his tests are difficult only b/c the text is somewhat difficult .. but honestly he will help you out if u truly need it .. nice man :)

2.0
5.0
STATS2020
Jun 12, 2007

Neil is too educated to be teaching a stats class. He leaves you behing if you missed a concept or wasn't paying attention for 60 secs. If you don't have a strong mathamatics background you will fail.

4.0
5.0
PSYC2210
Jul 4, 2007

First question you should ask yourself before taking PSYC 2210: do I need this course? I say this because if you don't need it, don't bother taking it. It isn't very interesting. Nield is a pretty good prof. The times I went to class he was interesting enough. I think 8:30AM for this course is way too early. Maybe if I had him after 10AM...hmmm...

5.0
4.0
PSYC3260
Aug 8, 2007

This course isn't great for your GPA. Exams are hard - tricky multiple choice, short answer (paragraphs) and essay questions too. He'll know if you don't really know the material. That said, he's extremely nice and understanding, flexible, and friendly. He has a bit of a dry voice so sit up front to hear better, but the lectures aren't bad.

5.0
1.0
STATS2020
Sep 8, 2007

Dr. Nield is a great prof! The only A+ I'va gotten in this univ so far! I strongly reccomend him! If you have good logic, his exams will be piece of cake for you! I studied so little and always topped in the class! Don't listen to the other coments! You will learn so much from him, especially if u plan to go to graduate school!

5.0
1.0
PSYCH2210
Feb 27, 2009

Took learning psych with him. He is a greta prof, he makes the exams a joke. on the essay questions you get to chose what to answer so you don't need to know everytihng, just be an expert in one part and u get get an A plus like me. Last exam i forgot to study one chapter and it didnt affect me becuase his MC are so obvious, while the essay you cho

3.0
5.0
PSYCH2210
May 21, 2009

Professor Nield is a nice guy and from his lectures and the text you would think you would be able to get a good mark. Unfortunately he gives you only 2 tests worth 45 and 55% and his tests are very DIFFICULT. For a students used to getting A's and A+'s you can expect about a C+ (if you're lucky). The average mark in my class was an D.

5.0
3.0
PSYC3260
Dec 8, 2009

Very interesting professor who knows what he is talking about. Explains things quite clearly, with lots of real-life examples, although he does have a tendency to go off on (generally interesting) tangents. Tries to cover too much in only one semester though, with 2 chapters assigned each week. Exams are tough, but fair. Seems very approachable.

5.0
2.0
PSYC2210
Jan 8, 2010

Pretty interesting class, his multiple choice are tough but do-able. You gotta know the concept extremely well.

4.0
3.0
PSYC3260
Mar 13, 2010

Very friendly guy who seemed to enjoy talking to students. Explained clearly with lots of real-life examples, and usually interesting ones. Occasionally, he would go off on tangents, but they were usually entertaining. Easily enough material for a full-year course though, so a lot of reading each week. Tests were not too bad, if you know the book

3.0
3.0
LEARNING
Dec 3, 2010

Really nice guy, really smart....but his lectures are SOOOOO boring its not even funny!!!

4.0
3.0
LEARNB
Nov 7, 2011

This course is tough for a 3 credit. He is a wonderful person, i just wish the lectures weren't 3, hours. The material is boring, but i think he does his best. The exam was tough but i was shocked at how well i did, A+. If you want something easy, don't take it, but if you are willing to work it shouldn't be a problem for you.

1.0
5.0
LEARNA
Mar 19, 2012

worst class ever!!!!!!

4.0
2.0
2210
Mar 11, 2013

He is the best professor ever!!!!!!!. The ones who disagree is because they failed!!!!!

5.0
3.0
3260
May 1, 2013

Personally: nice, laid-back. In class: contextualizes material with examples from life. Things are written on the board or projected for a reason-will be on test. Lectures explain/expand on text; attend (no ppt), & read closely. When studying: get major studies (names, findings) DOWN, and relate them to theories- be precise, MCs are tight.

2.0
5.0
PSY2210
Dec 5, 2013

Although the material of the book is tough, he can't do anything to make it easier. I personally can't understand his lectures because of his tone. We only have two exams (mid,final) with too many material to understand for each exam, almost 7 chapter in each. It would be helpful to understand book if we could be tested in four exam, instead.

4.0
3.0
3260
Feb 26, 2014

Very boring lectures-unorganized, lack of flow, gets off topic then looks through notes again-hard to stay awake! Could be better if he focused on more interesting details & planned better. Too much material for each exam & he does exams in a way that makes it complicated for himself rather than the standard way. Doesn't post on moodle.

2.0
5.0
PSYCH2210
Mar 20, 2014

This was not a bad course but so far my least fave psych course. Everything you need to know is in the textbook. I didn't take notes in his lectures cause it was impossible. That being said tho Dr. Nield is really nice and funny, but his lectures made no sense. VERY hard exams... class average was around 50%. thank goodness for the bell-curve.

2.0
3.0
PSYC2210
Apr 3, 2014

Although the professor is a nice guy overall, he isn't necessarily a good lecturer. His lectures were basically pointless, he didn't post anything online or even have a powerpoint in class, he just rambles on and writes random key words on the board. The exams were alright though. As long as you study the textbook on your own, you should be fine.

2.0
4.0
PSYC3260
Apr 13, 2014

No need to go to class,extremely boring and doesn't cover much material-no slides, seems very unorganized. Not a good lecturer. Just read textbook and you will do fine, but unfortunately he packs in way too many chapters (2 per week) and he doesn't use moodle.

4.0
5.0
PSYC2210
Grade: C
Jul 23, 2014

The course, book and the exams are really tough. He does not use powerpoint during his lecture or never upload any material online. It is really hard to hear what he is teaching so hard to take nots. You only can rely on the book which is the hardest book ever I have read. There are only 2 tests 45 and 50 worth each. I ended up C :((

4.0
5.0
PSYC2210
Sep 5, 2014

Exams were difficult in the sense that questions felt extra jargon sensitive with some MC questions lacking clarity--Be sure to be 'a parrot of the textbook' for his class.'

1.0
4.0
PSYC2210
Sep 11, 2014

Worst Professor I've had at York. Boring Lectures, unclear, and does not explain concepts. The first exam was ridiculously hard, most people failed. However, the final was much easier!

4.0
4.0
LEARNING
Sep 14, 2014

He's boring, old fashioned where he does not use technology, only 2 exams (midterm and final) dry lectures, nice guy though, and you HAVE to understand all of the examples in the textbook because the biggest and longest examples will appear, Good luck!

2.0
4.0
PSYC2120
Grade: A
Feb 25, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Prof Nield was knowledgeable about the subject matter, but his lectures would be much more helpful if he used powerpoint & Moodle.

Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

0%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

59% confidence
Based on 3 grades
Most common grades:
Drop/Withdrawal (1)
A- (1)
C (1)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(0)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 4 reported grades
Drop/Withdrawal: 1
A-: 1
C: 1
A: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.66 avg change
Feb
Mar
Apr
Jul
Sep
Feb
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

1010

5.0

(1)

10102020

5.0

(1)

20202210

5.0

(1)

PSY2020

5.0

(1)

PSYC4170

5.0

(1)
+35 more courses
Difficulty by Course

20202210

5.0

PSYCH1010

5.0

PSYCH2110

5.0

PSYCHMOTI

5.0

COGNITIVEPSYCH

5.0

Similar Professors