2.7
Quality3.0
Difficulty38%
Would Retake93
Reviews38%
Would Retake
93
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
28
4
10
3
3
2
10
1
42
What Students Say
“Got an F for the course and academic probation”
MATH01130 - 1.0 rating“The lowest grade you could earn for any non-cheating assignment is 50%”
MATH01131 - 1.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
25%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.33 avg changeRatings by Course
DAA
5.0
(3)CS04222
5.0
(1)CS07351
5.0
(2)CS06205
5.0
(1)CS06395
4.7
(3)Difficulty by Course
MATH01130
5.0
LABTECH
5.0
CS02435
5.0
STAT02286
5.0
PS4CS
5.0
Reviews (93)
Despite the fact that he holds live, online lectures, he is an enigma. In his second final online exam, he accused me of cheating and submitted a Level 4 RAIV. Got an F for the course and academic probation.
The lowest grade you could earn for any non-cheating assignment is 50%. However, if he accuses you of cheating, which happens A LOT, he is big on giving you -100% instead of 0%.
He seems to like this job and his exams seem to be reasonable. However, he is VERY big on accusing people of cheating. Half of the class got Level 4 RAIVs from him.
His lectures are clear and concise. However, he often rambles on and on about how much he hates Rowan, Rutgers, Cherry Hill East, and our Governor. I had failed his first exam because of other circumstances in my life. However, he wrote "F-" just to be offensive. I have officially withdrawn without telling him.
Goes on tangents about hating Rowan. A moderately crazy conspiracy theorist. His homework assignments and midterm were reasonably fair and got returned quickly. This guy failed me on his final exam, bringing my grade down to an F. However, he gave me a D- so I cannot retake without getting screwed by financial aid.
Very weird methodology. Best described as "Distance Calculus" from Roger Williams University where you watch videos and do HW. Getting less than 70% on the final exam means autofailing the class. A lot of work for 2x66 sections. If he accuses you of cheating, you will get a Level 2 RAIV, and it will stick.
He taught 10 sections of Calc 2 from 8 AM to 10:45 at night. One final exam, pass-fail. (>=70 = A,
This guy is pure awesome! Don't know how this guy teaches 10 sections of this class from 8 AM to 10:45 PM from Monday to Friday. Do the HW and both midterms, even though they are worth 0%. Your grade comes from a final exam (80%) and an oral exam (2 attempts. You have a short conversation with him and solve a few problems on a whiteboard) (20%)
You will learn a lot in his class and it will be stupidly easy. Do not "divide and conquer" on the homeworks because everyone will be in trouble on the exams. The oral exam (which you can take at any time) is unusual but incredibly satisfying. He also goes on random history tangents and rambles to himself in other languages.
This guy teaches 14 sections of Calc II all day from 8AM on Monday to 10:45 on Friday. This guy got rear-ended on his bike on 322 and the first thing he does is ... still come to class. He moves heaven and earth to make learning easy for us. Don't be scared off by his 80% final exam and 20% oral exam.
It doesn't matter what class he teaches. TAKE HIM!!! You will learn, you will pass, and it will all be stupidly easy. Get into one of his 3x75m sections so you can get some interesting filler activities. (i.e. Screening Disney's Cinderella in old French, CS algorithm lectures in French/Dutch/Danish/Italian/Polish, etc.)
Goes off on many, many tangents. Zone out or you will hate our government and our politics. Midterms were somewhat challenging but worth 0%. Even braindead people could pass his final exam. I never bothered taking his oral exam.
Doesn't matter what class he teaches. TAKE HIM !!! He will teach you. You'll learn a thing or two. Sometimes challenging HWs and slightly easier midterms, but all worth 0%. If you don't get at least 85 on his final, you've got problems. Only dislike is that he would often go on history tangents and rants about how this country is broken.
After the final exam, you are going to question the time you spent doing his problem sets and midterms. The final exam is worth 80% but even braindead people could get at least a B on it. Likes going on rants about weird/political things and also did weird filler activities No idea how he grades stuff for 14x100+ students so quickly.
Goes off topic in weird but funny ways. Always goes on weird tangents and rants about weird things. Weekly HWs and 5 Midterms that he grades but are worth nothing. HWs and Midterms can sometimes be challenging, but his final exam is an actual joke.
I had Anthony Ung for Calc 1 three years ago. He was very challenging and I didn't do so well in his class, but I've learned quite a lot and got an A in Calc 2 and 3. Now, I feel like I learn just as much, but he's made this class stupidly easy. Somehow, he gave an entire lecture on Dijkstra's algorithm in Dutch and it makes sense
Had him for Calc 1 three years ago. That class was hardcore. He seems to genuinely enjoy teaching OS and the entire grade is based on programming projects. He gave an entire lecture on semaphores in Dutch (Because Dijkstra's invention) and it was very entertaining.
14 HWs. 5 Midterms. All worth 0%. Consistent D/F averages across the board. The final exam was a joke. If you simply do all the HWs and pass all 5 Midterms, there is no reason to not get an A on his final. He rants a lot about weird political things too. Also, he has weird filler activities like screening movies that he has personally bootlegged.
A colossal waste of my time. Always goes off on tangents. Weekly HWs and Midterms are fair but not worth anything. Surprisingly well organized for the ridiculous number of sections he has. The most asinine thing is that if you fail his final exam, he will actually give you an Incomplete and force you to retake his final until you pass. Avoid.
Very chill dude. Very gentle assignments aside from one. Beware the Mongo HW though. He throttles his own AWS node at the instant that HW is due to stop the few latecomers in their tracks. That assignment is also memorable because he prints all of our work and there is always more red ink than actual text
The prof quit mid-semester so they brought in this grad student to teach LabTech. Mr. Ung made us implement Huffman Compression, Unix Shells, and Web Proxies in C89. Do not take another class with him.
He is a rockstar but his homework and exams are very challenging. Speaks with some kind of European accent. Also, I do not understand the point of his homework and Midterms if his final exam is worth 100% of the grade anyways. He teaches you, you WILL learn, but it is very nerve-wracking
Weird accent that takes some time to get used to. Homework and exams were quite reasonable. Just do the things he tells you to do and remember the things he says. Overall a very fun class. I'd take anything else with him.
Had to withdraw from Fiedler because of external circumstances. This guy will make learning easy for you but he will go on too many tangents. Seems to have a love affair for the modern European Faacists.
If you fail his final exam, he will not let you take an F and take someone else. He will give you an Incomplete and make you retake his final exam. He never stays on topic for very long and his homework assignments are very challenging.
There's a reason why Myers doesn't like this kid. I got flagged for cheating on the NCL game and this kid got the rest of the department to treat me like a criminal. Also nickel and dimes us for points on the lengthy reports he has us writing.
This guy teaches Calc 2 pretty much all day every day and he sucks. Always strays off topic. All the time you spend on the homeworks and midterms will be for naught as your nature grade comes from a braindead easy final exam.
everything about dr h class made 100 times worse
just do everything he tells you to do (maybe six hours a week outside of class) and youll be doing leetcode hards left and right in no time
Absolutely heartless. One of my classmates committed suicide, someone brought it to his attention, and he simply chuckled and said he was going to pretend that never happened. Impossible HW assignments that not even the tutors or the other teachers know how to solve.
8 pages of math test all of it was trig subs thick accent from god knows where get ready to fail his class
got perfect zero on his test and he laughed me out of his office
A student drank himself to death at party and Mr Ung LAUGHS at situation His first exam was all trig subs and the median was a 0
We went from 117 to 5 rather quickly. I get the idea that he only wants to teach top students, which I happen to be. He will teach you a little bit of everything but everything on his tests always involves trig in some way
Lowkey goated. most people dont wanna do work …
someone cheated on ncl game and he went to the ends of the earth to get that guy expelled
Had him for a few classes now. Very relaxed guy. Every single class I've taken with him is a different experience. Myers interrupts his class every single day and curses him out for something.
A lot of people don't even make it to syllabus day because they've seen the oral final exam on his syllabus. The class has become very fun and engaging.
I've had this dude for multiple classes. I've survived his Calc II and Databases. Taking the crosslisted PS4CS/PS4ECE may have been a mistake ...
I've had this dude for a few different classes. He will teach you. You will learn. This time it isn't easy. He is known for nuking peoples' exam grades over subtle nuances so be sure to do all his extra credit and do the very best that you can
He took over another prof's class and turned it into a boot camp for NCL. We all got 2000+ on our individual games. Since there were 5 of us and he is still a grad student, he let us compete on his team.
I feel bad for this dude because of his day-to-day interactions with the other faculty and grad students. Simply show up, stay at least half-awake, and everything will take care of itself.
Pretty much every dataset we discuss in class and on the HWs involves poverty and/or political corruption. References to the Yugoslavia breakup and Srebrenica come way too often. 5 annoying projects and no exams. Wouldn't recommend.
We "learn" more about who is responsible for poverty and political corruption rather than the statistical methods to "prove" such findings. If you want to hear him justify various parts of the Yugoslav wars, be my guest.
GOATED!!! Exempted everyone from his final exam and then screened Cinderella in old Italian as our filler activity
He lost me when he said that America could fix poverty, political corruption, and socioeconomic inequality the way Rwandans did in ‘94
If you weren't well-versed in Calculus and Linear Algebra and Discrete Math, you were going to have a VERY bad time. Do not take.
His lectures are AMAZING, but if you are even slightly weak on arithmetic, algebra, logs, or trig, he will flush you out and nuke your grade. Find review material on YouTube that your Pre-Calc instructor may not have covered (e.g. Trig Sum-to-Product formulas).
Feels very much like an entire semester of his personal project regarding poverty and political corruption. He also loves picking on Bob Menendez, HOAs, and Cherry Hill East in particular.
I took quite a few classes with this guy and this one was a disappointment. Mans gave an entire lecture about Post-WWII suburbia completely devoid of any math and/or statistics. That lecture was about the institutions perpetuating classism and racism and appears to bash his childhood community more than teaching us anything.
If you're taking Calc II over the summer, please for heaven's sake do not take Mr Ung. He dislikes students outside of Rowan and makes snide remarks about peoples' socioeconomic backgrounds. There seems to never be enough time for the 4 unit tests and the only saving grace is that the final exam is worth 40% of the grade.
Goated. Most people in the summer classes are transplants from other colleges who don't want to do work. For heaven's sake do not try to cheat on his tests either because he is trigger-happy about ripping students' tests up in front of the class and RAIVing people
This class was mostly high school students and met 4 times per week for 50 minutes. Exams can be such a time crunch if you do not prepare yourself adequately or struggle with trig! He also brought in some Calc II topics which made me really well prepared to take someone else's Calc II.
Not for the faint of heart. He gives about 100 recommended HW problems which he will grade but do not count toward your grade. His exams have relatively few questions which combine several concepts together. Also likes going on tangents but will somehow still teach you everything you need to know.
I had a very bad time in the beginning because he would go on so many tangents and I got boned with the arithmetic. He caused me lots of grief on tests but I became super duper busted in other people's Calc 2 and 3.
He went on lots of esoteric tangents that only people of a specific age range would understand and he made us do principal component analysis by hand. He also went on even more tangents about government policy and specific social issues. I liked him as a person but he wasn't the best fit for this class.
He is very chill except if he sees someone mistreating their classmates in particular ways. The NCL doesn't run in the summer so instead he has some technical writing baked into the labs. Simply do everything he says for the few dozen TryHackMe labs and few lab reports and you'll have your A.
Took over yet another summer course. To him, machine learning tools are simply a means to justify why America is socioeconomically broken and to justify government policies straight out of the Project 2025 Playbook. I genuinely liked the programming but there wasn't enough of that.
It is very clear that I didn't learn the things I was supposed to in Pre-Calc or Functions. This class feels like being thrown in the deep end of the pool and being expected to know how to swim. No bueno.
he will make you hate all your previous professors while making himself sound like a saint
he made tons of snide remarks about the rich students
Seemed like exactly the type of person who will tell you everything you need to know in a way that you will never understand until long after you need it. The Weierstrass substitution was put on one lecture slide and on one problem in his 100-problem set and ended up on his test.
The first thing he tells you to do is drop his class. I didn't take him seriously and I regret that. He gave us our first test during late add/drop and at least 1/4 of the class was getting perfect zeroes.
this guy goes on long rants about poverty and political corruption and proposes alarmingly concerning fixes for those problems
On the first day of class, made everyone do least squares by hand. Expects us to download multi-gigabyte datasets on a regular basis. Every single dataset we worked with is about poverty or the last election. Has EXTREMELY CLEAR biases.
I've seen bad blood in his interactions with other members of the department but telling us 5 students to use his NCL coach code and not saying anything about Camden County College crosses a line
I noped out of there once he described America's socioeconomic divisions as being similar to Yugoslavia's and Rwanda's ethnic divisions. And Bob Menendez's corruption only helped make some parts of his case. Lecture examples are needlessly and obnoxiously difficult.
Cancelled class so he could go to a school board meeting and request specific sped programs to be DOGE'd. Claimed that sped problems are culture problems and that institutions ought to force NTs to getalong with NDs like the integration fights of the 1950s. His class feels like my old social problems class on steroids.
Always went on weird tangents about his old high school, Cherry Hill East. Also described how COVID lockdowns broke K-12 education and the job market.
Had him for Calc II, DAA, and OS and loved those classes. In Data Mining, he uses his little pulpit exactly like Father Coughlin once did to offer commentary about COVID lockdowns, the broken job market, K-12 Education, and income inequality. DM is a little harder than his other classes but still doable if you try to understand him.
Very gentle class contentwise. Feels liek social problems class except data is weaponized to support his own predetermined conclusions. Makes it very clear he believes our entire generation has been wronged by the world and is incredibly biased towardds specific government policies.
A handful of exams and labs even braindead people can do. Very clearly told us that our generation deserves more kindness and compassion from the world and told us to keep score about who broke the job market.
Told us we had a right to continue breaking this country's political climate if our degrees don't work out for us.
He straight-up told us that Republicans learned their lesson from 9/11 and the PATRIOT act regarding public safety but the Democrats never learned theirs from COVID. Also told a room full of MechEs that FASCISM is a viable solution to the college grad underemployment crisis and pulled up ZIP code data of communities to expropriate wealth from
Will teach in 10 minutes what everyone else teaches in 75. Tests seem fair and don't understand why real classmates get so many perfect 0s. However, also rants about how this country is broken and sings enormous praises about Polish and Argentinian fascism.
Cancelled class more times than not this semester because of school board meetings, state legislature speeches, and court appearances but extremely insightful about the parts of America and the world that are broken. Most parts of this department do not do him any justice at all.
His labs are stupidly easy but this time, he very clearly and informally tells us why his NCL coach code is for Camden County College.
Labs can be quite annoying but our first test was comically EASY. However, he has an obsession with this recent college grad underemployment crisis and feels like it is HIS personal DUTY to get revenge on the people and institutions in this society that he believes to be responsible for this crisis.
He cancelled a lot of class in the beginning of the semester to grandstand about various social problems. Also does extremely long rants in class. Apparently having underemployed siblings from the same high school excuses blaming the Democrats' COVID policies, voting for certain politicians, and wishing Yugoslav atrocities on his own hometown.
This guy took a three semester sabbatical during his undergrad to go to CMU and take their hardest classes. He then modeled his own Comp Org and OS after CSAPP. Bomb Lab was SO MUCH FUN!!!
We have an important governor's election next week and he continues fixating on K-12 education and COVID lockdowns and our broken job market. He always blamed the Democrats the entire time.
It is quite difficult to fail him. A midterm and final presentation, some reports, and some handwritten homeworks all based on Leetcode problems. Don't take him because he was coaching us to vote for Ciattarelli and blame the Democrats because most of us couldn't find internships.
I had him before in Calc 1 but this class feels different. He axed lecture slides. He uses a PDF from a textbook published in 1953. He somehow brings the textbook back to life. He made us do all our homeworks and exams in blue books. Simply write good notation, remember the things he says, and it's gg.
Stats was extremely gentle with this guy. He will hold your hand through the calculus and linear algebra you need to know. My only gripe is that despite the lecture he gave describing the motivations for sampling, he still gives us 40-60GB datasets on the same few socioeconomic issues and that need to be copied from flash drives.
You'll pass easily but you won't learn anything. He uses this class as his pulpit for parroting wildly aggressive authoritarian capitalist and redistributionist policies that aren't even in Project 2025.
This cat is peculiar. He uses textbooks from the 1950s and 60s and doesn't maintain anything besides grades on Canvas. He knows how to use Canvas to its full potential. His lectures are entertaining and he likes going off on history tangents.
I'm sure he used to be great in the past. This class was given a special schedule to accommodate him yet he still can't lecture to save his life and he assigns an oral final exam instead of a written one. Take his lecture handouts and try to parse out the few important comments he makes. Saved my bacon on the final exam.
His lecture videos make Trig sub and Series EZ. He is VERY strict about cheating. He gives us a macro-enabled spreadsheet that makes us enter or student ID numbers and tells us what our exam problems are.
This grad student gave off grandfatherly vibes but sometimes bitter. He drops many nuggets of wisdom but it takes highly focused effort to pick up what he puts down. His curving of final course grades is also wonky.
He made trig sub and series look cool. Other than that, he is almost always angry and bitter. He is also a bureaucratic pain for me to get my exam accommodations or get points reinstated for late homeworks.
This is the easiest A you will ever get from him but you won't learn anything aside from a handful of very specific political issues.
His teaching is an acquired taste that I don't have.
Every time someone's unable to run a class this random grad student takes it over and does something out-of-the-box with administratives. I've had this guy for more classes than I care to remember and he is clearly past his prime. He recognizes random students' faces in the wild but never their names unless they've had him more than once.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
25%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.33 avg changeRatings by Course
DAA
5.0
(3)CS04222
5.0
(1)CS07351
5.0
(2)CS06205
5.0
(1)CS06395
4.7
(3)Difficulty by Course
MATH01130
5.0
LABTECH
5.0
CS02435
5.0
STAT02286
5.0
PS4CS
5.0