2.3
Quality4.0
Difficulty67%
Would Retake86
Reviews67%
Would Retake
86
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
11
4
19
3
9
2
14
1
33
What Students Say
“Only take this class if you're 100% interested in the topic”
PS301 - 3.0 rating“Specific references to the text will improve your exam scores”
PS301 - 4.0 ratingClass Info
Attendance Mandatory
33%
Textbook Required
100%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.55 avg changeRatings by Course
PS451
5.0
(1)POLSC403
5.0
(1)POLSC301
4.7
(3)PS441
4.0
(1)POLIS101
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
441
5.0
POLIS101
5.0
POLSC403
5.0
POL403
5.0
PSY101
5.0
Reviews (86)
No Comments
Women's issues count. Education doesn't.
No Comments
She turned me off to political science.
Lectures have a fatty eliteness about them with an aristocratic gentry flair.
Arlene was the worst. Lectures were boring and elitist.
Doesn't elevate the level of discussion. Makes too many asides alluding to her own politics.
There's nothing wrong with Saxonhouse that avoiding her won't fix.
It seems that, since she became the 1st lady of the department, her title went to her head and now considers herself better than others. Lectures are poor and self serving. There are clearly better choices for a professor of Political Science.
She knows her stuff but often has difficulty speaking in class, confusing theorists and their corresponding theories. You can learn quite a bit during lecture, if you can manage to stay awake.
i wish i never took this class. do NOT take it unless you enjoy being put to sleep. p.s. you have to read 13 books.
This class is for independent thinkers. There isn't class participation because it's a LECTURE. The reading isn't very heavy because it's mostly excerpts from the books. Also, most things you read are important and should be read anyway. She really knows what she's talking about.
readings are okay but, its her lectures that are confusing and boring...wish I never took the class.
booooorrrrring. the readings were alright but her lectures were horrible.
She was extremely boring. The readings are all very important for polisci major, but the professor should be avoided.
Terrible lectures that are boring and not helpful.
Good prof, attractive older woman.
i fell asleep durin gthe first week of lecture and decided that i had to drop it, so i did. avoid her if you can
The readings are all essential to have for any polischi major but her lectures are boring and unclear. She has trouble getting her points across. I definately have learned more Greek, than i have political science. Avoid the professor if you can, but the course readings are definately essential to furthering your knowledge of polischi
No Comments
The readings for this course are so important for anyone planning to major in political science; but, although the words of Plato and Locke may still have their eloquence, Saxonhouse has none. She is a horrible public speaker (stutters, repeats herself, etc.), but this class is so valuable. You’ll learn a ton, just bring a crossword to lectures.
I really liked this class. I took it my first semester of my freshman year and it was a very easy A and the readings were interesting. My GSI wasn't great, but I never missed a lecture and I enjoyed doing the work. No one liked the prof but I think she was good.
she sucks
Saxonhouse is the definition of boring! She is very knowledgable on the topic, and seems to know exactly what the material's importance is...However she is incapable of expressing that knowledge to her students. She is boring, boring, boring and very unenthusiastic. Plus she only wears neutral colors! Avoid her!!!
couldn't ask for a worse professor...absolutely boring...poor lecturer-studders, repeats herself, doesn't get important concepts across to students...avoid this class altogether and start with pol sci 111 instead
We ended up reading lots but focusing only on a few key concepts. You have to go to lecture to pass the class. Its hard if you didnt read this stuff in High School.
Overall I thought she was pretty smart and if you actually went to lecture and had the maturity to stay awake for an hour you will find her very helpfull
The worst part about Polisci 101 wasn't how boring Dr. Saxonhouse was but the grading of the 2 blue book exams. Entire sections recieved B's for work that should be considered an A in a 101 class. All in all it was a very disappointing experience.
Unfair grader
sssspit it out saxonhouse. stutters, and basically repeats the same sentence 100 times in a lecture. her lectures led me to realize i never wanted to take another political science class. absolutely horrible.
She is a nice teacher. Polisci 101 isn't a great class, there isn't much she could do about it.
She is arrogant and self-righteous. She spends most lectures giving you terms that she mis-pronounces and misspells, but always corrects you on. Her exams are based on obscure quotes from the books, rather than actual comprehension. And her "review" sheet is not useful. She is the type of prof that makes you wonder about teaching standards.
I had Professor Saxonhouse a few years ago. Grow up, you ninnies. You're at a research university with 40k+ students. If you want to be entertained, watch TV. If you want to have coffee with your faculty, go to a liberal arts college in the woods. Plug in to her expertise and show an interest or sit back and enjoy the big school experience.
A classroom and meeting time in seach of a professor.
Arlene gets a bad rap for being boring, but I found her delightful. If you listen close enough you will begin to catch onto her wit and humor. The GSIs graded kind of hard, especially Pat.
Her lectures were fine, and engaging as long as you had done the readings and weren't messing around on facebook. The problem for me was that the exams were hard--not that they were nitpicky--but that they gave vague quotes that were supposed to make you flow forth a very specific diatribe about a concept, problem is, the quotes didn't show that.
An aggressively bad class. There are times when it tips the scales of absurdity and becomes almost comical.
I would advise anyone not to take her.
Tiresome and swamped with distracting lapses in logic.
Saxonhouse knows her****. She's been the department head, is helpful during office hours, and is a fair grader. The pop quizzes were rough, but if you do the reading on time you're fine. I didn't do the reading on time, so I wrote an extra paper and I was STILL fine. She doesn't suffer fools, but she's truly interested in philo lit and good at it.
This is not a good class, it's not even a bad one. It's worse than that. It's hard to put into words how excruciatingly painful it was.
She knows what she's talking about and it's often a pity that there isn't more time to discuss each reading. Her lectures call for thought; they go into far more depth than simply recounting the readings. The class could be either inspirational or excruciating - it will be what you make of it. Refreshing.
I hated this class. I don't know if it's all her fault but I feel what the class covers is boring & sometimes hard to grasp. I think she expects us to all think like her & we'll pull some great theory out randomly in our papers. You need to go to lecture to understand what is going on, but discussion is even more important.
She's terrible. Listening to her is impossible, because her voice just drones on and on and slides right out your ears. Instead of analyzing the texts, most of the time she just reviews and summarizes them, despite specifically saying that it would never happen. Horrible.
The readings are difficult and she only clarifies about 20% of the material. Hope you get a good GSI if you take this class. But as its a pre-req for many other PS classes, honestly, just don't take it with her. No textbook, and the exams consist of identifying and explaining quotes from the 20 books you're req. to read. HARD!
Really boring. I usually fell asleep during her lectures.
People who dislike Prof. Saxonhouse or think she's a bad prof most likely just didn't understand the material. She teaches extremely difficult material, and she teaches it well. Don't take her class if you aren't interested in putting some effort into the class.
The information is really interesting and crucial to anybody who is majoring in political science. Everybody I knew absolutely dreaded lecture, but you have to go to do well. A lot of reading, and the final is ridiculous-the study guide doesn't help much and its too harshly graded.
Overall I enjoyed the class b/c I had a great GSI. It was hard to stay awake in lecture even though the points she brings up are intriguing. Her voice lacks dynamic and makes the listener sleepy. Lecture is important you attend, even if you do not complete all the reading :( you can get the basic gist of what she wishes u to identify on the test
She is amazingly intelligent and is a fantastic lecturer. Her read on the material is very specific however so make sure you go to lecture and listen, not just read the material yourself. It is also very important to make sure to have the right edition of the book assigned, she relies heavily on the footnotes.
She is a wonderful professor and a very intelligent woman. I found that in lecture I wanted to type almost every word out of her mouth, she is so knowledgeable.
Horrible instructor. This loses it's way immediately and goes downhill from there.
The material is really hard, mostly classical philosophy. But she's always willing to help during office hours. But the material is really dense, don't take this class unless you have an interest in Plato, Aristotle etc.
An overbearing, oddball class that offends your sensibilities. A complete bomb.
Horrible professor. Check your brain at the door or be suspended in disbelief at this.
Absolute nutcase. Don't take unless you've already read all of the greek tragedies and can quote aristotle from memory so you'll know what she's talking about.
She expects a lot and part of that expectation is coming to class to learn the material. You either love her or you hate her. She's extremely willing to help outside of class and seems to genuinely want students to succeed. She also really cares about what she teaches.
Well the exams are hard, you absolutely must come to class (no lecture notes here) and doing the reading certainly helps. That all being said Prof. knows her stuff and if you have an interest in this material take the class. If you're looking for a blow off, this ain't it.
You NEED to come to class or else you will not do well. Form Study Groups with other students which is what we did. as long as you catch her EVERY word in lecture then you'll be fine. And she's willing to help you outside of class. its hard stuff but if you know it you'll do well.
Confusing lectures makes this a terrible experience in the classroom.
A good class should be interesting, thought-provoking, have heart, and inspire interest in the subject matter. This has not one of those things.
Hands down the most painful class I've ever taken. The lectures and material are boring. The tests are ludicrously hard. She wants you to participate just to tell you you're wrong. Avoid.
This class is a stinker that takes itself seriously. I can't understand the purpose, point, and trajectory of this pointless fiasco. A sad indicator of lost potential where provoking subject matter should yield at least produce adequate results. It's an all-around misfire.
Ludicrous amounts of reading for very little benefit. Lectures are painfully slow and boring. She has one viewpoint, and all others are wrong, so get used to it. Often assigns 4 or 5 hours of reading and then spends less than an hour explaining its significance. She loves to throw in Greek or Latin words to look smart. Definitely do not take.
Arlene certainly knows the topic which she teaches, but that's really the only positive. She has strong opinions and insists that you agree with her, or don't bother speaking. Also, she poses vague questions and proceeds to stall for 20-30 minutes until someone states what she wants to hear.
This class is one of the best PS classes I've taken at U of M. It's not easy by any means, but Arlene is a great professor who really wants you to understand the information. The reading is not 100% necessary and sometimes it's a bit lengthy, but she goes over everything in lecture. If you study everything she says in lecture you will do well.
Go to lecture. Keep good, DETAILED notes. If you miss a class, get good notes from a friend. Read. Ask a lot of questions, and visit her in office hours (ask the right questions and she'll basically tell you what she's going to stress for the exams). Like others said, it's not a blow-off class, but almost a guaranteed A if you do the work.
Bad lectures and readings don't prepare one for the tests and isn't helpful in office hours.
Easily the worst class I've ever taken and the teaching style is the reason why. You can feel the arrogance.
The whole class was, understandably, based off reading the Federalist Papers, but we also read it in class together, which cut into time for discussing and analyzing the text. It also prevented us from being able to go over everything we read. Essay grading is a bit subjective, but she's willing to help if you go to office hours
The class involves a lot of reading and 3 essays, but that was it. Attendance is mandatory, and you must participate and pay attention constantly in class. Arlene really knows the subject well; however, at times she can be a little picky. This was a class where I worked hard (but not too hard), enjoyed it, and learned a lot, definitely recommend.
Arlene is a tough professor. She is strict in her interpretation of the readings and fairly arrogant. On the last day of class, she refused to talk about the reading. She also post minimal resources online and talks like a mouse while telling us to speak up. This is a very difficult course and do not recommend taking it with her.
This class is for grownups. No give aways, it pushes you to learn. 4 hours reading a week and can't miss class. Do yourself a favor- sit in the front, she speaks softly. That said, it was the most rewarding class I've ever taken. Material is brilliant, lectures were full of thoughtful analysis. Included some time for class discussion, questions.
Grades unfairly and does not even grade her own tests. This is done by assistants who aren't familiar with the material by their own admission.
Lectures tend to be long and brutally boring. She speaks very quietly and is hard to understand. Do not take this class with her. You will be in for a painfully boring and tough semester dragging yourself to class.
Only take this class if you're 100% interested in the topic. Be prepared to take vigorous notes on everything she says. She doesn't accept outside opinions because she's convinced everything she says is the only answer. The tests are graded partially by her but also by a GSI who has told me that even she gets confused by what Arlene says in lec.
This class was a delight. The material is incredibly interesting on its own but professor Saxonhouse successfully transcended the readings by linking them all together in a way that made perfect sense. Her lectures were as helpful as it can get. If you show up regularly and do the readings to a certain extent then this class is an easy A.
Reading is crucial. Specific references to the text will improve your exam scores. Take this course only if you are interested in the history of political thought and are willing to do a large amount of reading.
A horrible time for all involved as groans and long faces were common. Oscillates between dull and cringe-inducing.
Unclear and frustrating. Sit in the front row and listen closely. A tough class because lectures are bad.
Though the readings are long, she goes into them in great detail. As long as you take good notes and make sure to reassert the points she has made in class you will get a good grade. Participation is encouraged, but not mandatory. Came into the class with little knowledge of ancient theory, would only suggest interested in ancient thought though.
Saxonhouse is a kind and knowledgeable professor, very helpful during office hours. If you are interested in ancient thought, this is a great class for you. Exams are long and related to readings. Readings are heavy. You have to take good notes during class. Would recommend taking a class with her
Ignore the bad ratings about her. She is a great professor, and if you are interested in Ancient Political Thought, I'd highly recommend her class. She provides a good survey of classical political thought and does a good job at relaying thematic development through the semester.
Professor Saxonhouse is finest professors that I've had the privilege of learning under. If you're interested in political theory and you attend the University of Michigan, you would be doing yourself a disservice not to take her class. She's erudite and witty; she also puts together a diverse reading list for the course. Attend class and read!
Professor makes the class difficult to succeed in if you don't follow everything she says to the letter. Her lectures are all verbal about the long readings. With nothing to follow the lectures with whether it's powerpoint or writing on a chalkboard, it is difficult to follow everything she says. Her class doesn't foster a successful environment.
Professor Saxonhouse is great. She is understanding and supportive of all students Her courses are not easy, but if you put in the effort, then you will get the grade you truly want. Regardless of which course, make sure that you attend lecture. She makes everything crystal clear and straightforward. Students who don't do well likely skip lecture.
Class Info
Attendance Mandatory
33%
Textbook Required
100%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A+
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.55 avg changeRatings by Course
PS451
5.0
(1)POLSC403
5.0
(1)POLSC301
4.7
(3)PS441
4.0
(1)POLIS101
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
441
5.0
POLIS101
5.0
POLSC403
5.0
POL403
5.0
PSY101
5.0