3.4

Audrey MacNevin

Social Science - Saint Mary's University

3.4
Quality
3.6
Difficulty
54%
Would Retake
87
Reviews
3.4
Quality
3.6
Difficulty
3.5
Helpful
3.4
Clarity

54%

Would Retake

87

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
87 total ratings

5

30

4

20

3

16

2

7

1

14

What Students Say

“Hardest tests of my university career, terrible lecturer and does not answer any question you ask her, basically listen her rant about unimportant things to the course”

SOCI3012 - 1.0 rating

“A bit of a hard marker but does a great job with the classes”

SOCIOLOGY - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

48%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 23 grades
Most common grades:
A (6)
A- (6)
B (5)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(5)C(2)D(1)F(1)A-/B+(6)
Based on 23 reported grades
A: 6
A-: 6
B: 5
A+: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (16)
Test heavy (6)
TEST HEAVY (5)
Tough Grader (4)
Caring (4)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (4)
Graded by few things (4)
Amazing lectures (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.88 avg change
Dec
Mar
Aug
Nov
Apr
May
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

INTROTHEO

5.0

(1)

SOCI

5.0

(1)

SOCTHEORY

5.0

(3)

SOC210SS

5.0

(1)

CRITICALTHINK

5.0

(1)
+37 more courses
Difficulty by Course

WOMENSSINTRO

5.0

SOCT

5.0

SOCI3012

5.0

S3010

5.0

211

4.0

Reviews (86)
1.0
4.0
SOC2201
Dec 9, 2002

No Comments

5.0
3.0
211
Jan 15, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
SOC211
Jan 22, 2003

She likes her big, confusing words. But I guess you can get used to her.

3.0
3.0
SOC2112
Feb 18, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
SOC
Mar 6, 2003

reads right out of the book......boring as hell

4.0
4.0
SOC210
Mar 10, 2003

I found her to be a good teacher, however many people found her course difficult and compared to other SOC classes it was a little harder.

1.0
5.0
SOC210
Mar 16, 2003

One word...HORRIBLE!!!

5.0
4.0
SOCIOLOGY
Mar 16, 2003

Amazing! Does a great job teaching... and does a great job at getting the ideas across to students. You will love this prof!!

1.0
5.0
211
Mar 31, 2003

i think i cried everyday after her horrible tests... she is the devil!

3.0
4.0
SOC211
Apr 6, 2003

Her tests are hell..and she seems a little on the feminist side...also a good chance of her being a hippy when she was younger

5.0
4.0
SOCIOLOGY
Apr 25, 2003

Great Prof. You will do well in her classes.

4.0
3.0
SOC210
Dec 13, 2003

She's fair and she knows her stuff. Stop whining and do the work.

4.0
3.0
SOC210
Dec 16, 2003

Was nice enough. A little boring but overall good. If you know the book you will do very well.. you wouldn't even have to go to class really

5.0
3.0
INTROTHEO
Dec 16, 2003

Great prof. Works hard to motivate the class. Dose a great job. Two peppers to you Dr. mac. ;-)

4.0
3.0
SOC210
Dec 18, 2003

she's a good proff. i didn't mind her at all. The tests can be hell if your don't read

4.0
3.0
SOC263
Feb 10, 2004

very good. may not be the "easiest" prof, but who said university is supposed to be easy! her teaching metheod should be the standard for all courses at smu, that way we could eliminate poor course content, and sloppy teaching.

1.0
5.0
SOC210
Feb 12, 2004

Her Tests are the WORST.....Take this class with someone else she sucks!

5.0
3.0
SOCI
Feb 20, 2004

What a wonderful prof. She does make you work, but it pays off cuz you know your stuff by the time the term is over. Real nice smile too ;-)

2.0
4.0
SOC
Feb 26, 2004

Not clear at all, and did not explain info. well

4.0
3.0
SOC210211
Mar 2, 2004

hard to listen to...notes on the P drive...dont bother reading...tests not that hard at all...study all notes

5.0
3.0
SOC
Mar 7, 2004

I had this prof. a few years back, and I have to say I really enjoyed the two classes I took with her. You do have to work hard in her classes, but she is fair, clear and very helpful.

3.0
5.0
SOC
Mar 18, 2004

Way over my head! She needs to turn it down a notch she is way too hard to understand.

5.0
2.0
SOCIOLOGY
Mar 24, 2004

Fun,amusing,fantastic, bright, at ease,and at times is a real academic aphrodisiac. What a prof!!!

3.0
4.0
SOC210
Apr 11, 2004

very feminist views. domineering. don't take this class with her.

5.0
4.0
SOCTHEORY
Apr 24, 2004

Good Prof. and WILL NOT exercise power over you in a cruel and autocratic manner!

5.0
3.0
SOC210SS
Jun 29, 2004

Awesome! My fav at SMU so far. Very articulate, clear, and fair. Makes you work for your mark like a professor should. Very intelligent, bringing a lot more to an otherwise dull course. Can't wait to take another course with her, made me like school again

5.0
3.0
SOCIOLOGY
Jul 21, 2004

Audrey supervised my thesis a few years back, and I came to know her fairly well. She is very patient, very helpful, and ridiculously intelligent. Audrey is not an unduly harsh marker, but those of you looking for an 'easy' grade should steer clear.

1.0
4.0
SOC210
Aug 6, 2004

Horrible. Her test have nothing to do with lectures or the book. Its like she gets the test question from who know where. Shes a feminista! Don't take her unless you want to work hard for a C.

4.0
4.0
SOC101
Aug 12, 2004

A very interesting person. Very classy, emphasises certain things clearly... she's kind of hot... ok if she was 20 i would nail her. She talks sideways a lot and smiles. Definitely a must see if only once.

1.0
4.0
SOCIOLOGY
Oct 3, 2004

No Comments

5.0
3.0
SOC
Nov 14, 2004

people talk about her being a femenist as if that is a bad thing... did you fools not realize taht you took a SOCIOLOGY course??? either way, this woman knows what she is talking about and understands how to disseminate info to people who are new to the material. take a class with her and work hard.

5.0
2.0
CRITICALTHINK
Nov 25, 2004

I admitt its been 2 years since I took Critical Thinking with her and I found it kind of boring while I was taking it, but I still remember the so much from the course. She really gets in your head nad makes you look at society from a different point of view, and it sticks there!

5.0
3.0
WST200
Dec 30, 2004

Wonderful Prof! Very passionate about her discipline. Respectful of and open to everyone's comments and opinions (even annoying airheads who have no idea what they're talking about). I will go out of my way to take more classes with her!

4.0
3.0
THEORY
Jan 5, 2005

extremely helpful but very hard to understand, use her office hours for clarification if you have any trouble she'll talk you through it. Not the easiest marker but I'd say fair...probably wouldn't take another class with her though

5.0
3.0
SOC2102B
Mar 3, 2005

An extremely intelligent prof. She is open and enthusiastic. She sticks to the text quite well, but deviates a bit with her own opinion. She keeps your attention and encourages questioning (props to her for managing a debate with almost 300 freshmen).I hope to have another class with her!

1.0
5.0
SOC210
Apr 1, 2005

No Comments

5.0
4.0
WMS200
Apr 12, 2005

A hard marker but a very good prof. She is interesting, and a very smart woman!

3.0
4.0
SOC210
Apr 16, 2005

Not a bad professor, she is biast in her views especially on the subjects of feminism and her lectures are sometimes rather dry; concentrating on material that is irrelevant to the subject matter...take her if you have no other choice

5.0
4.0
SOCTHEORY
Jun 26, 2005

I am a formal MALE student and I loved being in this prof.s classes. She was great. Those people that can’t get over the feminist theory are whiny. She is intelligent, clear and very articulate.

5.0
4.0
SOCTHEORY
Jun 28, 2005

Very good prof. Encourages you to be involved with class. I enjoyed her class very much.

5.0
5.0
SOCIOLOGY
Jun 28, 2005

Good prof. A bit of a hard marker but does a great job with the classes.

5.0
1.0
SOC362410
Aug 22, 2005

Audrey is an aweseome prof, he knows how to teach theory and how to make it relateable to students and to everyday life. I also took a course with her on SOC of Food which was really interesting, she is a great prof. As for those feminist bashers, get over yourselfs, stop attaching profs who are trying to change **** attitudes.

5.0
3.0
MANY
Oct 2, 2005

I took her classes every chance I had. She is an amazing professor. Knowledgeable, fair, interesting, well spoken and helpful. Really challenged some of my beliefs and opened my mind up to a new way of thinking. I would recommend her to anyone for any class. She was one of the highlights of my university career.

5.0
4.0
FOCUSONWOMEN
Oct 30, 2005

Best prof I've had at SMU, hands down

4.0
2.0
SOC2362
Nov 29, 2005

Good knowledge of materials but extremely boring lectures and confusing explanations.

5.0
5.0
WOMENSSINTRO
Dec 3, 2005

No Comments

5.0
4.0
FEWCLASSES
Grade: B
Dec 11, 2005

I had her for a few classes and though she is a hard marker, she is fair and is one of the reasons I majored in Soc. recommended

5.0
3.0
SOCIOLOGY
May 21, 2006

I had this prof for intro and classical theory and I think that she is magnificent. You might find the readings difficult, but she always manages to make them clear in class, always!

5.0
3.0
SOC0000
Dec 2, 2006

I had intro to soc with her and loved it. I went to class because of interest not because I had to. She's nice and always willing to explain something. She calmed me down when I thought I bombed a test and told me to just wait and see what happens. Her seminars are really helpful and let you get to know the class. Take her if you can.

1.0
5.0
SOCT
Dec 17, 2007

Although she is a very nice and is usually available during office hours, I found her to be extremely difficult to understand. She spoke to her students as if they were fellow prof's, and it simply made learning impossible, especially for only a second year class. I don't recommend her and i have dropped my secnod semester courses with her.

5.0
3.0
SOC2362
Jan 11, 2008

great proff! very helpful and nice and very intelligent!

4.0
5.0
SOCI2362
Sep 2, 2008

You have to study hard in this class. She is not easy marker on papers so do not ignore her comments regarding paper.

4.0
2.0
SOCI1210
Feb 2, 2010

I never went to the lectures, didn't even crack the book open at home, and my pencil stayed sharp because it never met paper. I got a C-, and that was from guessing on the midterms and the final. Awesome x)

3.0
3.0
SOC1210
Mar 30, 2010

She knows her stuff, but I found the lectures to be incredibly boring as they came basically straight from the textbook.

3.0
3.0
SOCI2362
Dec 9, 2010

Really passionate about what she teaches - but you might want to have a dictionary because she likes to use "big words". You definitely have to read for this course in order to do well. Two essays and a take home final exam.

2.0
3.0
SOC3323
Mar 12, 2012

Found her to be pretty vague and unhelpful. Nice enough lady but class became quite boring as everyday it was just the same, listening to her ramble on about some obscure thing nobody in the class really understood..

2.0
4.0
CRIM2010
Mar 14, 2012

MacNevin is a nice woman, however, she teaches as if the students have an understanding of big words and various theories. Explanations were vague and hard to understand. Lectures were EXTREMELY boring! The only positive thing I have to say is the way we were marked. two tests, one art project or essay, and a take home exam.

4.0
3.0
SOCI2362
Sep 23, 2012

She's a nice person and very articulate. Some of her lectures are boring, but others are really interesting. She's a hard marker, but not unfairly so. Overall a solid prof.

3.0
3.0
SOCI3826
Grade: A+
Jan 6, 2014

Boring lectures. Has been teaching for 20 odd years and it shows as most lectures are filled with 2nd wave feminist views and offensive terminology from the 70's. Readings are a MUST. Review slides for tests. Take home exams that aren't that difficult. Nice to talk to but answers questions by saying a whole lot of nothing.

1.0
5.0
SOCI3012
Grade: C
Dec 12, 2015

most boring lectures ive ever had to endure and probably the hardest marker also

1.0
5.0
SOCI3012
Grade: F
Dec 12, 2015

Hardest tests of my university career, terrible lecturer and does not answer any question you ask her, basically listen her rant about unimportant things to the course

4.0
4.0
SOCI3011
Grade: A
Jan 7, 2016

Audrey is very respected and inspirational. You will learn more than you ever expected to in a class. She makes you work for the marks, but you benefit from it in the long run. If you don't work hard or hate reading, do not take this class.

3.0
4.0
WST200
Grade: A-
Oct 11, 2016
Would take again

She's a very nice lady. She uses a strong vocabulary and will expect you to know this vocabulary for the test. If your a hard worker you will do fine, if not I wouldn't recommend taking it.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
4.0
3.0
WST200
Nov 22, 2016
Would take again

Very enthusiastic and passionate which equate to amazing lectures. Her tests are tricky so it important to do the readings she has a wide vocabulary and it is important to note that her students are accountable for understanding any terms she uses or that are present in the text even if they are irrelevant they will likely be included on her tests.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
4.0
4.0
SOC3343
Dec 7, 2016
Would take again

She is really nice and is very passionate about what she teaches. I loved what I learned in the class, and I found myself actually wanting to go and listen. The only draw backs were that she is a tough grader, especially on punctuation and her directions on how she wanted you to write were often unclear! Make sure you go see her on office hours

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
Caring
3.0
4.0
WMST1200
Grade: A
Dec 11, 2016
Wouldn't take again

The class was very enjoyable, but quite difficult. Professor MacNevin made the classes enjoyable, but unfortunately the tests are almost entirely based on information from the textbook, which generally isn't covered in class. She expects a bit too much for a first year class, but the seminars are helpful for getting easy points.

Get ready to read
5.0
3.0
SOC1210
Feb 1, 2017
Would take again

Dr. Macnevin is fantastic. She articulates herself well, and is extremely engaging in class. I find all of her lectures quite interesting, and I genuinely enjoy the way she teaches. She also has a unique style, and I love the way she carries herself; a very inspirational woman. Yes, she uses "big words" - but a vocab upgrade never hurt anyone!

Get ready to read
Inspirational
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
2.0
3.0
SOCI1210
Grade: A-
Feb 7, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Powerpoints every day, prof reads them off which you can do yourself. 4-5 slides each class, pretty much sums up whatever you were supposed to read from the textbook. $95 book that I don't use. The course is graded on three midterms. Two 35%, one 30%. Done on a scantron, 50 multiple choice. Bring a pencil or you'll get a 0.

TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
2.0
5.0
S3010
Oct 31, 2018
Wouldn't take again

SUPER nice woman. Very intelligent prof. However, do not take her for classical theory unless you want to take a huge hit to your GPA. Three multiple choice tests that unless you have a perfect grasp on the readings, your probably going to do very poorly. Multiple choice are wicked hard! and I studied, a lot.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
2.0
4.0
SOCI1210
Grade: A-
Nov 27, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Only graded on 3 tests and though she says the questions are based on material covered in class and the text, most of the questions are specific from the text. Openly says she tests on stuff from the text that she doesnt mention in class. Wish she would do more questions about things covered in class to reward people who attend the lectures.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
4.0
SOCI1210
Grade: B
Dec 2, 2018
Would take again

Such a good prof. She is definitely passionate about what she is teaching. Also very funny and her lectures aren't dry. Her tests are quite hard, when studying I would recommend being able to use the notes and apply them to everyday problems, using examples is a good way to study.

Hilarious
TEST HEAVY
Caring
3.0
3.0
SOC1210
Dec 2, 2018
Would take again

Acknowledged when the entire class didn't do well and provided opportunities to improve grades. Is more interested in helping you learn the information rather than just trying to get through the curriculum.

Gives good feedback
Hilarious
Caring
5.0
3.0
WMST1200
Grade: B
Dec 4, 2018
Would take again

Solid prof, lectures are interesting and she is excellent at connecting the topics back to our own lives. Tests are quite hard, you must read all the text book readings in order to pass... however she recognizes when the class is struggling and provides opportunities for students to make up for lost marks. I highly recommend taking this class!!

Get ready to read
Inspirational
EXTRA CREDIT
3.0
3.0
SOC1210
Dec 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Used PowerPoints for her lectures and essentially read off the PowerPoint. Occasionally would add details but not often. She also had a habit of comepletely rewording questions that students asked her, and when she answered, it was not at all related to the question. Never even opened the book. Got stuff done during lectures, but it wasnt socio.

1.0
3.0
CRIM3010
Grade: A-
Dec 7, 2018
Wouldn't take again

MacNevin is a case of people who are incredibly smart, and understand the material they teach but should never actually teach it. Her slides were odd and her lectures were all over the place. Cannot teach. Classical theory with her felt like intro to sociology again not pleased. Expect about 20% less then what you typically get.

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
4.0
WMST1200
Grade: A-
Dec 12, 2018
Would take again

Dr. MacNevin is a sweet lady and she connects real life to every aspect of the content she teaches. Her tests align with the textbook material. Theres 3, each worth 25%, so it counts for a lot. They arent easy tests. The seminars are easy points, go to class whenever those happen! Read to understand and you'll do well :)

Inspirational
TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
4.0
CRIM3800
Grade: C+
Apr 7, 2019
Would take again

Great professor, the only thing i really hated was the fact that she really takes a lot of the content from the book and sometimes the class felt more like a book club than it did a lecture, and I did not pay $600 for a book club. Very nice lady and really understanding when you miss things.

Respected
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
3.0
5.0
WMST1200
Grade: B
Sep 2, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Hardest and most confusing multiple choice exams Ive ever written in my life. Its a shame students marks tend to suffer in her courses because the course content is really interesting. Wouldnt risk this as an elective if youve got a scholarship to maintain tho. Spent the most time on this course outside of class only for it to be my lowest mark

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Tough grader
4.0
3.0
SOC1210
Grade: A
Sep 30, 2019
Would take again

She outlines every test and makes sure that everyone in the class knows exactly whats gonna be on the test and how the questions are gonna be styled. Honestly one of the best teachers Ive had yet because most dont care enough to help make sure you understand everything.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
SOC1210
Grade: D
Dec 5, 2019
Wouldn't take again

3 large tests and absolutely no learning objectives or material layouts to help your studying. Her lectures contain 4-8 slides... that's all. you have to study the textbook-like crazy to pass this course. The tests are very difficult and FULL of only textbook material. i would not suggest taking this class. it's a waste of money and lowers GPA

Get ready to read
Test heavy
4.0
4.0
SOCI3343
Grade: A
Dec 17, 2019
Would take again

Audrey is a great professor who I have had multiple courses with. She is a tough grader but that is because she expects submitted work to be at an academic level. The tests are solely based on the readings and the terminology, so a deep understanding is required there. She is very caring towards her students and a great person overall. I recommend.

Get ready to read
Caring
Tough grader
3.0
3.0
SOCI1210
Grade: B
Mar 2, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Audrey was an interesting lecturer and easy to pay attention, but it was very test heavy. Only 2 midterms and a final for your grade, and all multiple choice. Multiple choice were very wordy and confusing to understand. So many questions and takes forever to read each question on the test.

Graded by few things
Test heavy
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
SOC1210
Grade: A-
Aug 7, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Professor MacNevin only graded us based off of 3 tests. She would test you on ANYTHING from the textbook (ie even captions on pictures and percentages shown on small charts). Her tests were difficult and the M/C options were all very similar. Be prepared to take lots of notes in class as she often writes stuff on the board.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Tough grader
5.0
3.0
SOC4826
Grade: A
Nov 22, 2021
Would take again

Professor MacNevin is a phenomenal professor, and person. I've had multiple in-person and online classes with her and her lectures are always insightful. If you do not do well it's because you are not putting in the time. You do not get to just read the powerpoints and pass. MacNevin is reasonable and cares about her students!

Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
2.0
4.0
SOC1210
Grade: A
Apr 7, 2022

Never actually spoke to MacNevin herself, but the way she structured her online class made it unbearable. Spent the entire semester just reading from the textbook preparing for the three exams. If you get a bad grade there's no way to get your grade back up. Never listened to a lecture as she admitted that the information wouldn't even be in them.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Graded by few things
4.0
3.0
SOC1210
Grade: A+
May 4, 2022
Would take again

Professor MacNevin is a great lecturer. We were graded on three tests only. You need to know the material and not just memorize facts in order to do well. There is no chance at extra credit. Follow her advice with how to study for the tests and you should do well. This course takes effort.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Graded by few things
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

48%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 23 grades
Most common grades:
A (6)
A- (6)
B (5)
Grade Distribution
A(8)B(5)C(2)D(1)F(1)A-/B+(6)
Based on 23 reported grades
A: 6
A-: 6
B: 5
A+: 2
Common Tags
Get ready to read (16)
Test heavy (6)
TEST HEAVY (5)
Tough Grader (4)
Caring (4)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (4)
Graded by few things (4)
Amazing lectures (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.88 avg change
Dec
Mar
Aug
Nov
Apr
May
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

INTROTHEO

5.0

(1)

SOCI

5.0

(1)

SOCTHEORY

5.0

(3)

SOC210SS

5.0

(1)

CRITICALTHINK

5.0

(1)
+37 more courses
Difficulty by Course

WOMENSSINTRO

5.0

SOCT

5.0

SOCI3012

5.0

S3010

5.0

211

4.0

Similar Professors