2.9

Augusta Rainsford

Mathematics - Rutgers - State University of New Jersey

2.9
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
19%
Would Retake
156
Reviews
2.9
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
3.0
Helpful
2.7
Clarity

19%

Would Retake

156

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

51

4

11

3

25

2

24

1

45

What Students Say

This professor has got to be the most rude person I've ever met

CALC251 - 1.0 rating

Possibly the worst professor I've ever had

MATH152 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

35%

Textbook Required

36%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 35 grades
Most common grades:
A (13)
Not sure yet (9)
C (5)
Grade Distribution
A(14)B(7)C(7)D(0)F(1)A-/B+(6)
Based on 44 reported grades
A: 13
Not sure yet: 9
C: 5
B+: 5
Common Tags
Tough Grader (19)
TEST HEAVY (8)
Get ready to read (7)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (7)
LECTURE HEAVY (6)
Skip class? You won't pass. (4)
Tests are tough (4)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.08 avg change
Jul
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

151

5.0

(1)

151152251

5.0

(1)

CALC136

5.0

(1)

CALCULUS

5.0

(1)

CALC151

5.0

(2)
+37 more courses
Difficulty by Course

251

5.0

MAT135

5.0

250

4.5

CALCULUS135

4.3

135

4.0

Reviews (156)
5.0
2.0
CALC136
Apr 17, 2003

SHE IS THE BEST TEACHER IVE EVER HAD... SHE HELPS YOU ALOT AND SHE MAKES U UNDERSTAND EVERYTING IF I HAD TO CHOOSE HER AGAIN I WOULD SHE GREAT

5.0
1.0
CALCULUS
May 11, 2003

Awesome calc teacher. Really went through everything throughly and made sure you understand everything. Tests are real easy also.

5.0
1.0
151
Sep 17, 2003

No Comments

5.0
3.0
CALC152
Nov 23, 2003

Just show up to class and do the homework. you should be able to get a B easily. She is really clear with everything, very thorough. She tries really hard to make math easy for everyone. Definitely take her as your calc prof.

5.0
2.0
MATH135
Dec 10, 2003

She is so nice, and tries really hard to make the material easy. Very approachable and willing to help. Very fair grading policy. Just go to her if you have a problem. Very thorough and clear. Attendance and homework, exams non-cum. Great teacher for calc

3.0
2.0
CALCULUS1
Dec 27, 2003

even she said other people in her dept thought she graded too easily. she really tries to help you in her office hours, without making you feel dumb. just make sure you sit up front, she writes REALLY small.

5.0
1.0
CALC151
Grade: A-
Feb 20, 2004

One of the nicest professors at rutgers. Very good grader, nice person, and will help u out when u need it.

4.0
1.0
MATH251
Mar 7, 2004

I don't care how well she teaches, it was just awesome how she caught that person using a calculator during the test and giving her a 0.

3.0
2.0
CALC135
Mar 10, 2004

Writes too much, she talks and the words are written right there on the board, so you'll be too busy writing while she's explaining. She is fair, but her teaching method could use a little help... during lectures that is.

5.0
2.0
CALC135
Apr 17, 2004

She is really nice, but talks and writes so much that you wont have time to notice. Her tests are relaitvely easy and she is a fair graderr. Shes a really good teacher compared to others.

5.0
2.0
CALC135
Apr 17, 2004

Very nice woman. She is helpful and a fair grader. Gives partial credit and is willing to help students out as much as possible to get a good grade

5.0
2.0
MATH103
Apr 23, 2004

easy, extremely sweet and tries her best to be helpful, a very fair grader

5.0
1.0
CALCIII
Apr 26, 2004

She is so nice and so helpful. Her lectures are so explanatory and her first exam was the easiet thing all semester. She drops one of your midterms if you do well on your final and one of the midterms so best of luck to all. SHOULD DEFINATELY TAKE HER

1.0
5.0
251
Apr 28, 2004

"Gus" is extremely rude if you visit her office hours--contrary to the previous ratings, I think Gus's teaching methods are obselete, we dont need to her to restate all the info in the text! She is an OK grader,i'll give her that, take korchagi

5.0
2.0
MTH103
May 13, 2004

It was an easy topic and an easy subject but she made everything super clear.. sooo nice and friendly and really willing to help! Def take her!!

2.0
3.0
MTH251
May 24, 2004

her lecture didnt help. i fell asleep everytime. she made the things so hard to understand.if you were a guy, take her class. she treats the boys better than hte girls. its so obvious. very unfair.

4.0
2.0
CALC251
Jun 2, 2004

She is not bad, actually it was an easy class for me but then again I am a straight A student pretty much. She writes too much. Do your hmwk and go the lecture . Exams are just like hmwk and the problems that she goes over in lecture. I had like 470/500.

5.0
1.0
MATH103
Jun 30, 2004

Extremely easy. Go to class + Pay attention= Easy "A". I made study guides before every test. Then before the final I just looked at my study guides.

3.0
2.0
MATH
Aug 18, 2004

She's a fair grader...I'll give her that but Augusta Rainsford lacks compassion and empathy. Behind her sweet appearance lies a very cold-hearted woman who needs to seek therapy and unleash some of her repressed emotions..She'll be less bitter if she did.

4.0
3.0
135
Aug 29, 2004

Good Teacher, explains very well and is willing to help students.

2.0
3.0
CAL135
Sep 9, 2004

Gus, isn't a really good teacher. She writes to much and always takes the long way to teach. I am very attentive in her class and every time she gives a lecture she loses me.

5.0
2.0
CALC152
Oct 18, 2004

Gus is awesome! Very fair grader. Very approachable and friendly. She makes difficult and boring material interesting. She encourages participation in class. Exams were OK, but not too easy. Go to class, participate, show interest, you'll get an A.

5.0
3.0
CALCI
Oct 28, 2004

Shes so nice n she tries her hardest to make us understand u rock

5.0
2.0
151152251
Dec 13, 2004

Good professor, very helpful and supportive..good grader..

2.0
5.0
MAT135
Dec 23, 2004

She's **** and wayyy too slow. Also, she doesn't make the information interesting at all. She favors the 'good-looking' boys and giggles like a little school girl when they say something funny to her. Except for the poor weird kid in front..she treats him like he's mentally disabled. She sucks.

1.0
5.0
CALC135
Dec 28, 2004

She is the worst teacher ever! Who teaches Calculus using pretyped transparencies. She was very unclear and didn't know how to teach. I had to use the book to teach myself how to do everything. I wouldn't recommend having her as a professor.

4.0
2.0
CALC138
Mar 29, 2005

she not hard compared to how hard calc profs can be...she really wants ppl to understand..exams are manageable..do her study guide!!..otherwise very fair grader..and nice lady..just a lil boring sometimes..but its calc so how fun can it be?..take a class with her

5.0
3.0
CALC138
Apr 29, 2006

Gus is a good person very helpful and a fair and honest grader. She is always willing to help, she gives two exams and a final and even though i am not doing so hot, at least she is completely fair, and even easy compared to the true difficulty of Calculus.

3.0
4.0
CALC138
May 23, 2006

Seems like a nice and friendly teacher but her exams are very difficult. You better do every single suggested problem and know them well. She tells her students that if you failed the first or second exam but do well on the other two then she'll ignore it. Then at the end of the semester she counts everything with no exceptions to anyone.

5.0
1.0
CALC138
Jun 22, 2006

Despite the drull subject she teaches, she is a very well structured prof. One time she stayed 2 hours after class to help me and some other students. That is just the kind of person she is. She may look like a vagabond, but underneath she is a sweet woman Yes her tests are difficult, but all calc exams are.

5.0
3.0
CALC1
Jan 4, 2007

Rainsford is extremely helpful and expectations are reasonable. in order to do well, show up for class, take all the notes, and do the homework. exams are medium hard, but if you do well on the homework (no reason to not get an A- online at webwork), and do well on the recitation quizzes- they'll help your grade- she's one of the best calc prof

4.0
2.0
CALC135
Jan 17, 2007

Good teacher, though I didn't go to 1/3-1/2 of the classes, didn't do 3/4 of the webwork, went to every recitation, aced every quiz, got an A and C+ on both exams and managed to still get an A in th class. Very structured, only reason she would sound unclear would be because of the kids in the class, there were some very rude kids.

5.0
1.0
CALC135
Jan 18, 2007

She is probably the easiest calc teacher. Just go to class sometimes and study for the tests. I got a B- and an A on the two tests and then a B+ on the final and I got an A. She said she would overlook one bad hourly exam so its pretty easy to get an A. She writes a lot of notes on the board and goes by the book. Overall, shes a good teacher.

5.0
2.0
MATH251
Jul 27, 2007

While she is an EXTREMELY helpful instructor - as in she is one of the very few mathematics professor who both knows and loves the subject and is enthusiastic about teaching all at once-she brings her calc 135 mentality into upper level courses and classes are way too easy.its not hard to get the A in her class but it may not reflect comprehension.

5.0
1.0
CALC252
Sep 7, 2007

great teacher. probably the best i've ever had at rutgers. (rutgers has some horrible undergrad teachers.) she was very helpful, explanitory, nice, etc. couldnt say enough good things.

5.0
2.0
MATH251
Jul 29, 2008

Ms. Rainsford is a nice and caring teacher/person. She cares her students and tries to help them in ways beyond a teacher, more like a mentor. Whatever she makes you do in the class prepares you for the exams. By all means, take her. She is even more responsible than a highschool teacher is. I really doubt if there's a better teacher than she.

5.0
2.0
CALC251
Sep 25, 2008

Took Calc III with her during the summer. She's fair, accommodating, and she'll try her best for students to understand the material. For example, when we had to take the computer part of this class, she stayed late for the students who came in late! The only way you'll get anything lower than an A in this class is if you don't care at all.

5.0
5.0
CALC251
Nov 27, 2008

She is fair alright but her TA is obnoxious. Sometimes we ask questions and he said he doesn't want to answer because he doesn't feel like it. He tries to be funny but fails. I mean a TA is supposed to give his best knowledge when a student asks a question.

4.0
2.0
MATH103
Apr 22, 2009

She's a very sweet woman and is always willing to help, whether it be going over problems after class or offering extra credit.. but she's just boring. She recopies the book onto the board, but takes attendance so you have to go to class. I learned more than I did all semester in one night by going over the chapters on my own. And her grader sucks.

1.0
5.0
CALC135
Oct 24, 2009

THE ABSOLUTE WORST PROFESSOR. i was a straight A student in highschool and math used to be my favorite subject. this class is just terrible. one day she was like "you know we don't get paid to answer emails" with people asking for homework help. the worst teacher. dont make the mistake i made and go by what other people said about her. PROMISE.

1.0
5.0
CALC135
Nov 10, 2009

The absolute worst. SHE DOESNT NOT TEACH. SHE TALKS TO HERSELF IN CLASS AND JUST WRITES ON THE BOARD FOR THE WHOLE CLASS. youll need like a ten subject notebook cause all she doestn is write rather than actually explain whats going on. DO NOT TAKE HER TRUST ME.

5.0
2.0
CALC135
Nov 11, 2009

The people under me are obviously just trying to scare people away and make them drop. She is THE nicest professor ever. Exams are very fair and she gives a good amount of partial credit. She does give alot of notes, but they are very clear and helpful. Overall, great professor.

1.0
5.0
CALC135
Nov 16, 2009

you know, i really liked math and got straight A's until i came to her class. terrible teacher. her exams are the hardest examples. she moves way too quickly. i mean, the day before the exam she doesn't even review! she just moves onto the next section. there is no eye contact whatsoever. she's not nice & is not a people person.find someone else.

4.0
1.0
TOPIC027
Dec 10, 2009

I had her for Topics Math, a ridiculous math course for liberal arts majors. I agree with the others, she is not friendly, goes off on tangents a lot, takes up 3 chalk boards to do one problem, and is completely irrational when it comes to hw grading. Bad choice.

3.0
3.0
TOPICSEC2
Dec 17, 2009

OK. Her homework grading is impossible, i have literally got 20 points off for one problem. Her notes are all over the place, and she leaves no time to review for an exam. She just moves on to the next section and if you ever question her way of teaching and moving to fast, be prepared for war-because she WILL argue and hate you.

5.0
2.0
MATH135
Dec 20, 2009

very good teacher. She teaches you all the material with ease and will explain it all even if you had never taken calculus before. I never took it before and i got an A. take this class!

3.0
2.0
MATH103
Dec 21, 2009

she was pretty easy- her lectures were a little all over the place, but if you are patient and focused, it's not hard to do well

2.0
4.0
CALC135
Jan 14, 2010

Extremely bad professor. Makes you feel dumb when you ask questions. Embarrasses you in front of the class. All over the place. Won't let you out of class until the exact time...trust me she will use the 30 secs of class left to try to do a problem you won't understand and she'll will probably confuse you in the process by making countless mistakes

2.0
5.0
CALC135
Feb 20, 2010

I have always been good at math and I took calc for the first time with her. Not very helpful because she restates exactly what is in the textbook without an explanation or a clear example. She also is good at making students feel dumb for having a question

2.0
4.0
MATH135
May 5, 2010

Never had I had a more horrid teacher than her. Her handwriting is atrocious, she mumbles and talks to the board, makes you feel like an idiot if you ask a question, goes over problems in a hurry, and leaves you more clueless than before. It is also hard to self teach because the book isn't all that great. I highly recommend Kevin Noone.

3.0
2.0
MATH103
Sep 16, 2010

Yes, I agree that she's one of the most absentminded professors of all time. However, if you find that Math 103 is at all difficult, you shouldn't be at Rutgers. End of Story

2.0
3.0
MATH135
Nov 16, 2010

Talks to the board. Pretty unclear, but the material isn't bad if you can teach yourself. Recitation has a weekly quiz and is helpful. Exams are tougher than practice problems, so be prepared. I took Calc in high school, and got an A. If I didn't, I'd expect to have gotten a B. I feel bad, because she's very nice, just not a good teacher.

5.0
2.0
CALC135
Dec 19, 2010

I don't understand why some ppl say she's not helpful or clear. She was crystal clear in explaining my questions. I was so surprised. Do the hw problems in the textbook (although it's not necessary) and go to her office hour with questions. and try to attend some of her lectures. Exams were easy for me when I studied like this. Recommend her!

5.0
2.0
LINALC2
Dec 21, 2010

She is very sweet and nice. Attendence is taken and does make a difference in borderline grades. Quizzes almost every day, but she allowed us to drop two. If you do well on one of the two tests, she will ignore the bad one. Her explanations are very good, and she is willing to meet outside of office hours if needed.

1.0
4.0
MATH250
Dec 24, 2010

Shes terrible! She talks to the board and confuses herself (and therefore the class) while "teaching." I have gotten A's in every math class but this one. I had to teach myself everything from the book and her tests were nothing like her quizzes.

5.0
2.0
CALC135
Jan 7, 2011

My advice is to sit infront in class b/c she does talk to the board but if u pay attention you'll get it. she's very helpful and sweet during office hours answers all of ur quest. and makes sure u understand it before u leave. exams r easy if u study. i didn't so i got a D and F and C+ for final but ended up w/ a C+ for the class.

2.0
4.0
CALC135
Feb 7, 2011

Talks to the board, and exams are much harder than HW problems. I got an A without much work, but took Calc in high school; my friends who didn't and did work did much worse. Recitation is helpful, make sure you do well on (and attend) the quizzes there. She uses an attendance sheet, but it only counts if you're borderline. Gives a curve.

1.0
5.0
CALC135
May 13, 2011

hands down, worst teacher i've ever had. she talks to the board, ignores people's questions, and goes really fast. terrible experience

5.0
1.0
CALCII
Jul 22, 2011

these comments are so ridiculous. she is so nice! she does answer people's questions and she stays extra time during office hours for kids who wanna stay. I got an A :) Her exams are CAKE. so similar to the hw problems in the book. seriously, people who are complaining about her probably just didn't study and are trying to blame her for doing bad

3.0
2.0
MATH250
Dec 2, 2011

She does talk to the board, but she's copying the textbook anyway. If attendance weren't mandatory it would be the only class I'd ever have skipped. She literally copied the textbook.

1.0
5.0
CALC135
Sep 8, 2012

stay away from her. the worst teacher hands down. i did so much work, went to tutoring every day, and was lucky to get a C.

3.0
2.0
ALGEB251
Dec 24, 2012

Decent at teaching. Don't really need to go to class. Gives a slight curve

1.0
5.0
CALC135
Jan 19, 2013

Terrible. Completely useless. My TA taught me everything I know. A C is good in my book, especially after spending countless hours on problems, and in the learning centers. One problem will take up half of the board & my entire page across & didnt fit in my nb.Needs to split examples instead of focus on one problem that takes up 4 pages in my nb.

5.0
3.0
CALC1135
Feb 22, 2013

she is awesome!!! the people who say she's awful did not go to class, nor did they take advantage of her office hours when they needed help. it is extremely important to go to class. she is very clear and will answer ANY questions you have. such a sweet and extremely helpful woman! go to her office hours and STUDY!

5.0
1.0
CALC135
Apr 23, 2013

She is a really great professor. She does many exapmles of each kind of problem but it is best to reinforce her teaching with practice from the book. Go to class and copy all of her exapmles - you will likely find similar questions on exams. Also, she made herself very available for extra help and always held extra review sessions before exams.

5.0
2.0
CALC151
Apr 26, 2013

Amazing professor. Probably one of the best Math professors I've had at Rutgers in my opinion. She's ALWAYS willing to give you extra help if you reach out to her and do your part. Exams are not difficult if you study. GO TO HER OFFICE HOURS. Seriously I understood Calc ten times better with with her than I ever did with a tutor or otherwise!

5.0
1.0
MATH250
May 5, 2013

Go to class and write down the examples she does on board. They will show up on the exams. Easy B+ if you go to class and just study a little.

5.0
2.0
CALC135
May 5, 2013

She is great! such a genuinely nice person and gears the class toward helping the students succeed. She teaches the material in an organized and clear way but it would benefit you to sit in the front bc at times it may be hard to hear her. attend office hours and do the optional homework to study for exams. Take calc with her you wont regret it!!

5.0
2.0
CALC135
Nov 20, 2013

TAKE HER. Prof. Rainsford made calculus so easy to understand. She is an absolute angel and is more than willing to sit with you if you need help! Show up to class and copy down all the examples she goes over. I can't stress it enough TAKE HER COURSE!!

1.0
4.0
640250
Grade: C
Dec 10, 2013

She has no interest in teaching. Talks to the board. Has zero engagement with the class. Copies from the book (while attendance is mandatory). Pauses in-between sentence to write it down on the board (while you loose track of what she was saying in the first place). Gives easy quizzes and hard exams. Do yourself a favor and go with someone else.

5.0
3.0
CALC135
Dec 14, 2013

rainsford was such a nice genuine professor. calc is obviously a hard course so you have to put in effort. she goes out of her way to help her students. she helped me for 2 hours (not during office hours) to help me. just do your part and you well do well. her lectures are boring but then again calc is boring. i recommend taking her!

3.0
3.0
CALCULUS135
Dec 23, 2013

She's a very sweet lady and you know she has a passion for what she does; However, her pace and clarity when she teaches is subject to debate - I found it hard to keep up with her lectures because she would frequently make mistakes or make tangents that would further confuse her students. Regardless, PRACTICE, PRACTICE, PRACTICE!! That's calculus.

5.0
1.0
MATH250
Jan 15, 2014

She makes sure to go through concepts that one needs to know. Quizzs and exams are relatively easy, and proofs in this course are very simple.

1.0
5.0
CALC135
Jan 27, 2014

Awful, awful teacher! Thank goodness for my TA and the tutors at the tutoring centers! She needs to learn how to teach!

2.0
4.0
CALC152
May 6, 2014

Horrible teacher! She would teach the blackboard 95% of time and it was almost impossible to ask her a question, she would make multiple mistakes during her examples that would completely mess with the entire problem. She also has this problem of writing and then erasing and then rewriting the same thing (repeat 3x) for everything she writes!

5.0
2.0
LA250
Grade: A
May 7, 2014

I like her! No homework. Only quizzes.

4.0
2.0
CALC152
May 26, 2014

Her exams were not that hard the class itself is hard. Series and Sequences can be confusing but once you understand it the class is easy. I got a B on the first exam F on the 2nd and 75% on the final. She will happily help you when you go to office hours which i went to every week

3.0
3.0
MATH152
Sep 11, 2014

This teacher is alright! She thinks she is teaching the class but that is completely not the case. She was unclear in her answers when a question as asked. She never connected with the students while teaching and it looked as if she was repeating what she wrote on the board. 1st exam was easy, 2nd was HARD and the final was nothing what she taught

3.0
5.0
135
Nov 15, 2014

this class is extremely difficult especially if you didnt take calculus in highschool. The professor is very willing to help and will stay after aside from office hours, but her tests are really hard and she doesnt teach everything that will be on the tests. she teaches the basics and expects you to figure the rest out on your own, which sucks

3.0
4.0
640250
Dec 30, 2014

Avoid if you want a good grade in linear algebra. Her lecturing is all over the place, and she makes lots of mistakes as she goes. In class she goes over the basics, and the rest is up to you to learn. Final exam was ridiculous.

5.0
4.0
250
Jan 3, 2015

She's a really nice professor, however I think most people would agree she made the class a lot harder than it had to be. Her exams were tough but she was very nice and always willing to help you understand the subject especially in office hours. If you really want to learn the subject you should take her

4.0
2.0
MATH135
Grade: B+
Jan 24, 2015

she is very nice. if you follow her steps on blackboard and doing the homework, looking the textbooks, you can get B or B+ .

1.0
5.0
250
May 7, 2015

IF YOU REGISTERED FOR HER LINEAR ALGEBRA CLASS FIND ANOTHER PROFESSOR NOW!!! That's the best advice I can give you. Lecture is complete pointless. She will teach section after section in the same lecture with out giving an actually example on how to actually do the problem. Worst mistake I've made was registering for her class.

4.0
1.0
MAT152
Grade: B+
May 19, 2015

Look if you're taking 152 then chances are you are usually a math major or engineer. Prof Rainsford does talk to the board and sometimes may be hard to follow exactly what she's doing but if you ask her she will clearly explain. Calc 2 is hard material, so if you did not do well it is your own fault not the professors. Exams were not bad. Do HW.

5.0
2.0
152
Grade: A
May 23, 2015

she is nice. her lecture are long and boring. but her exams are easier than other teacher so your avgs would be much nicer than other teacher and she does prepare you for the final. I would say she was a great teacher

2.0
4.0
152
May 26, 2015

Rambles on at the blackboard, examples are confusing and sometimes she teaches like shes seeing the material for the first time herself. Erases and rewrites many many times because she is all over the place. Exams are not too bad but she gives NO PARTIAL CREDIT. doesn't assign much homework but youll need to read and do extra problems to pass

1.0
5.0
MATH250
Oct 29, 2015

DO NOT! I REPEAT! DO NOT TAKE HER! IF YOU ARE REGISTERED, SWITCH NOW!

2.0
5.0
LA250
Nov 18, 2015

Don't take her for linear algebra, she doesn't come prepared for class, is unclear when writing on the board. Not only does she mess up on multiple examples, but writes out everything in English, but ends up misspelling about half of the stuff. I come in having read the lesson from the book only to come out more confused. Not worth it, drop now...

1.0
5.0
MATH250
Nov 19, 2015

Do not take her class unless you have to do! Do not! The words on board are hard to recognize! Usually you don't know what she is talking about! There is no review materials for exam and the exam is also very hard.

3.0
4.0
CALC135
Dec 14, 2015

She did not have a review before the final exam. Calc is already hard enough but taking it with Rainsford makes it rocket science. There is no real organization to what she writes on the board so your notes are a mess. She will explain the concepts to you in words and do one to two practice examples. Don't take calc with her

1.0
5.0
MATH250
Grade: B
Dec 14, 2015

Not clear. Tough grader.

4.0
3.0
CALC135
Grade: B+
Dec 18, 2015

Although she would teach until the VERY last second of class, she was a very kind lady and always ready to help or answer questions. Her lectures weren't very formal either, she welcomed calling out. I can imagine that she may be more difficult if you didn't take Calc in high school.

2.0
1.0
CAL135
Dec 19, 2015

Very sloppy. Makes tons of mistakes. Speaks to the board a lot.

3.0
4.0
CALC152
Grade: C+
Dec 20, 2015

Calc 2 in general is a pretty hard class. she's not the best but she isn't the worst either.

3.0
5.0
CALC1
Grade: F
Dec 22, 2015

Try to get another teacher!!!!!!!! Do not take her unless you have to. Lectures were long and boring, unclear and stupid. I didn't understand anything because she teaches herself at the chalkboard. She rambles on and on and basically doesn't care that we don't understand what the hell she's talking about. She also takes attendance. And it counts.

5.0
1.0
CALC135
Grade: A
Feb 23, 2016

Wow, I was told that Calc at Rutgers was really bad. I came to some of the classes and asked questions, but she made everything so easy that I didn't have to try so hard.

5.0
1.0
CALC135
Grade: A
Feb 23, 2016

She's really nice and means well. That being said, buy the book ASAP as you need it to pass. Her test are a bit harder than other classes, but the curve is great. Put in 2 hours a week and your good.

5.0
1.0
CALC135
Grade: A
Feb 23, 2016

If you think this class is easy, your wrong. You need to have the mentality to put in at least 3 hours a week reviewing the material and also looking ahead to what you are about to learn the next week. Her tests are hard if unprepared, but if you studied they are a walk in the park. Good luck

5.0
1.0
CALC135
Grade: A
Mar 6, 2016

Firstly, get ready to read the textbook. Her lectures are best if you read ahead the chapter that she will discuss. You will understand more info if you know what she is talking about. Also attendance counts for your grade but only a tiny fraction. Do not think the class is an easy A, put in effort and you will get it, but don't fool around.

5.0
1.0
CALC135
Grade: A
Mar 6, 2016

Study the book, you will pass by just reading the book. To get an A (like me) you should go to the TA for extra help.

5.0
1.0
CALC135
Grade: A
Mar 23, 2016

It's calculus, not basic math. If you think it will be easy don't take the class. If you put in effort, study, and show up to class you will have a decent time. Tests are curved, many people will get in the 50s, but they are the kind of people who think the class is a joke. Study and you will do well.

3.0
1.0
MATH244
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 5, 2016

Very easy class, but lectures were unhelpful and a great deal of material was never covered. Be prepared to learn the material on your own to be prepared for other classes but enjoy the easy A.

5.0
1.0
CALC135
Grade: A+
Apr 5, 2016

Tough tests that you need to study for. The curve however, is great, because people tend to either get in 80s or 40s. Homework is easy, all you do is retry as many times until right answer (plus just put question into google and it has answer). Study for the quiz and final and you can get the A, that's what I did.

3.0
3.0
MATH250
Grade: A
Apr 6, 2016

I personally didn't like her. She was all over the place and unorganized. She would skip over steps and not explain things clearly. I ended up teaching myself from the book. I failed the first midterm but ended up with an A, so know there is a curve!

3.0
3.0
MATH244
May 6, 2016

Lectures were not very helpful. Attended nearly all of them. Show up for he first few minutes for the reviews she does of previous classes. If you plan on staying all lecture don't waste your time trying to keep up all she does is rewrite theorems from her notes. Pay attention to the examples. Do the suggested problems she bases tests off homework.

1.0
2.0
MATH250
Grade: B
May 11, 2016

This is an easy class but she manages to make mistakes all the time. Talks to the board a lot. Office hours are helpful, but you don't need them most of the time because the material is really easy indeed.

2.0
3.0
MATH250
Grade: C
May 16, 2016

helpful during office hours, but lectures are very unclear.

2.0
4.0
MATH250
Grade: C
May 23, 2016

Very boring, makes lots of mistakes but helpful during office hours

2.0
2.0
MAT250
Grade: C
May 27, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Lin Al is already dull, bu she makes it even more boring.

1.0
3.0
CALC251
Jun 30, 2016
Wouldn't take again

This professor has got to be the most rude person I've ever met. There is no respect, every conversation with her ends with her yelling something along the lines of "UHP UHP UHP UHP, I don't want to hear it" or something rude and dismissive like that. She doesn't respect you, she just interrupts and speaks over you like a child.

1.0
3.0
CALC152
Oct 24, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Takes off huge amounts of points for the smallest mistakes. Be very careful on exams, because even if you know the material, she has no mercy. Lectures don't help much if you don't already understand what's being taught.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
2.0
2.0
MATH152
Nov 4, 2016
Wouldn't take again

she isn't the most engaging professor. can be quite rude at times. depending on her mood she can help during office hours but sometimes she is just too angry at everyone.

2.0
4.0
CAL135
Grade: B
Nov 21, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Definitely not an engaging professor. When she lectures its like shes just going through a routine, not much feeling or gusto. Its as if she's reviewing the material for herself during lecture. I also feel her lectures/hw and even the recitations did not properly prepare me for her tests, which seemed to be way more difficult than the prep material

Tough Grader
1.0
5.0
CALCULUS135
Grade: B-
Dec 5, 2016
Wouldn't take again

She is TERRIBLE. Puts things on exam we didnt learn yet. She is always ruffled during class and has NO IDEA what she is doing. She is unfair. All other calc classes my friends take are by far much easier in terms of exams, work, and extra credit which is offered. She still gives quizzes the same week as exams. Her exams are NOTHING like the reviews

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
1.0
5.0
CALCULUS135
Grade: B-
Dec 5, 2016
Wouldn't take again

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
1.0
3.0
MATH152
Dec 16, 2016
Wouldn't take again

talks to the board 90% of time. Very rude teacher. AVOID HER!!!!!!

1.0
4.0
CALC135
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 19, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Terrible teacher. She's super rude and barely teaches in the first place. Her exams are nothing like what we did in lectures or on quizzes. You can't go to her for help either because more often than not, she won't help you. Highly recommend avoiding her as your calc professor at all costs.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
5.0
3.0
CALC152
Grade: A
Jan 8, 2017
Would take again

Don't trust anyone who doesn't put their grades up. She teaches what her superior tell her to in an organized manner. Sometimes will skip simplification steps (got lost sometimes), but will show derivations if you want to understand the process. Humorous, but also serious. Admits she is losing her mind lol. Overall on the better side of teachers.

Respected
1.0
2.0
MATH152
Jan 17, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She makes mistakes all the time. Poorly prepared and disorganized.

3.0
3.0
CAL135
Jan 18, 2017
Would take again

study hard for the tests, they are hard! homework is helpful with them so do them. Don't skip class unless you already know the material. attendance is sign in

Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
3.0
CALC135
Jan 21, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Terrible handwriting, but it's worth going to lecture. Recitation with Naum Perelman probably taught more than she did though and her exams were pretty difficult. She also gave 100 tries on Webassign which was good. But other than that, mediocre professor at best. Took "surprise" attendance 5 times in lecture.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
1.0
2.0
MATH250
Jan 25, 2017
Would take again

Very difficult to follow. You learn better from the TA than from her.

1.0
2.0
MATH152
Jan 27, 2017
Would take again

Possibly the worst professor I've ever had. This class is tough enough and she just makes it tougher. She flies through everything and if one student understands she assumes everyone understands. She skips steps while trying to explain. She is super condescending.

1.0
2.0
MATH151
Jan 28, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She wasn't well prepared. Makes mistakes all the time, talks to the board.

1.0
2.0
CALC1135
Feb 7, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She is constantly behind the schedule and doesn't cover important concepts.

3.0
5.0
CALC152
Grade: B+
Mar 9, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She teaches more theories and does a lot of examples but her work is very messy. She does not answer questions and has difficult exams as she teaches relevant subject matter days before the exams. Prepare to work hard if calculus does not come naturally to you.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
2.0
MATH152
Apr 25, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Badly structured class, lots of mistakes in class. Can be very rude.

2.0
4.0
CALC152
Grade: B+
May 17, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Can be really rude and has messy handwriting so it is hard to take notes. Goes really fast in class but allows for students to ask questions. Constantly makes mistakes while doing exams on the board and often skips steps (it's so confusing). First exam was easy but the second one was very, very difficult. The TA was better than her to be honest.

Skip class? You won't pass.
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
CALC152
Grade: A
May 18, 2017
Would take again

A decent instructor. Attending lectures could be helpful if you study ahead. Calc 152 could be an easy or difficult subject, depending on your study habits. The professor is fair with grading.

1.0
3.0
CALC135
Dec 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She makes so many mistakes while lecturing. She pretty much talks to the chalkboard when lecturing rather than to the class. Very dry lectures. Not animated at all. You need to study on your own and teach yourself the concepts if you want to pass.

Tests are tough
1.0
4.0
CAL135
Dec 19, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Worst calc 135 prof probably. Her exams were hard and class average was really low. Her lectures are also really useless because she copies straight from the textbook. I learned more from recitations. Also can be rude at times.

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Tests are tough
5.0
4.0
MATH300
Dec 20, 2017
Would take again

Okay so IDK why Gus has such bad reviews, I'm assuming it's cuz they are intro math classes, and they haven't actually had bad math prof before. But anyway, Math300 obv not an easy class, but she's a great lecturer, great at explaining difficult concepts & she really cares about her students understand everything. The best math prof Ive had.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Caring
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
4.0
CALC135
Dec 25, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Please, please avoid this class. Lectures are beyond boring and exams are very tough.

Tough Grader
Tests are tough
1.0
1.0
MATH300
Dec 28, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Gets confused easily. Talks to the board. The exams are easy but the class is boring.

2.0
2.0
MATH250
Jan 1, 2018
Wouldn't take again

She isn't engaging at all. You have to read the book to understand main concepts as she skips important derivations.

2.0
3.0
MATH250
Jan 17, 2018
Wouldn't take again

She's a nice person but horrible lecturer from my experience. She decided not to curve anything because apparently students abused the curve the previous semester. Her lectures were hard to follow cause she doesn't properly space her handwriting so it's like a big combined word instead of a sentence

Tough Grader
Tests are tough
1.0
3.0
MATH300
Apr 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Very unorganized, often taking 10+ mins to remember where we left off last lecture, sometimes even skipping over concepts she forgot we didn't cover. Most egregiously, she is possibly the least helpful professor I've ever had -- she would refuse to walk through questions to clarify difficult concepts, claimed to be "too busy" to invest extra time.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
2.0
4.0
CAL135
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 24, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Her exams are noticeably more difficult compared to other professors, for whatever reason. The average on the first was a 55 and the second a 50. They tend to be based off textbook problems, not past exams. Overall, she's unorganized, seemingly careless, and not the best professor. I recommend others, but not the end of the world if you have her.

1.0
4.0
CAL135
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 24, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Really poor in lecture. Her exams are significantly harder than anything she teaches you in class. Prepare for the simplest problem concepts to become unrealistically difficult. Overall trash.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
CAL135
Grade: C
May 2, 2018
Wouldn't take again

her exams are considerably harder than the exams given by other professors. Showed up 20 minutes late to the first exam and routinely shows up late to lecture.

Tough Grader
1.0
5.0
MTH251
Grade: Not sure yet
May 4, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I'm in DiffEqs. She's a nice person when you talk one on one, but she comes off arrogant during class. Her exams are very hardThe quizzes are straightforward, so you'd think the exams would be as wellShe wouldn't tell us the average of the exam(I got a 40-something and so did all my friends), concluding "there's no curve in life". Like, come on.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
CALC135
Grade: Not sure yet
May 8, 2018
Would take again

even though the math department at rutgers is bad, she was a great professor. she would always ask the class how we were doing and always took time to answer questions even when she was interrupted by them. she really cares about her students but the class overall is tough and the averages were super low.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Caring
3.0
4.0
CALC135
Grade: A
Jul 1, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Takes random attendance 5 times, go to class. Messy handwriting on board. Covers all material and decent lecturer. Not organized and does not give practice test questions. Just learn from examples in class, notes, and textbook. Second midterm was harder than the first. Not bad. Not good. However, she is very willing to help and answer questions!!

1.0
3.0
CALC152
Oct 9, 2018
Wouldn't take again

unfortunately the weakest lecturer i've had the displeasure of experiencing. she means well, but she fumbles over her notes and makes clerical mistakes constantly whilst copying from her notes. just show up for the exams & recitation, and read the textbook for 80 minutes during normal lecture times to get a similar understanding of course material.

Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
2.0
4.0
CALC251
Nov 8, 2018
Wouldn't take again

One word to describe her: sloppy. Sloppy handwriting, poor presentation skills, and not very invigorating. Basically, everything you typically wouldn't want in a professor, she has. She's incredibly nice in person, but comes off as arrogant during lecture. I would say she cares, but only sort of at the surface. She's been known to be cold.

5.0
2.0
CALC152
Nov 12, 2018
Would take again

Words cannot even being to describe how great she is. she helps you with anything if you ask and while she may write quickly all you have to do is ask her to slow down or pause. she's really good at explaining things and if you don't understand she'll keep explaining until you do. if you feel overwhelmed by homework she'll push back the due dates

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Hilarious
Caring
1.0
5.0
CALC251
Grade: B
Nov 26, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Take Rainsford if you want to have impossible exams with no curve in the class.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
1.0
2.0
MATH251
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 2, 2018
Wouldn't take again

For 251, she isn't definetely one of the worst lecturers. If you want to actually learn, take another professor. She often makes mistakes and isn't organized in her lectures. I think her lectures are a waste of my time. However, her exams are very easy compared to others. She doesn't like long or difficult questions.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Caring
1.0
3.0
MATH251
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 2, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Not a good lecturer. You won't be learning the best in lecture. But her exams are easy because they are straightforward and basically textbook example problems + class notes + homework. She doesn't put hard questions. Obviously, the material for calc 3 is hard, so you will need to learn it yourself, but she makes the exam easy.

1.0
1.0
MATH251
Dec 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

The weakest lecturer I had for calc 3. The exams were easy than other professors'. But she makes lots of mistakes and her class is boring.

1.0
3.0
MATH251
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 7, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Terrible.. I stop going to her lecture because I can barely understand her handwriting. I would rather watch some videos online than going to her lecture because her lecture is not helpful at all.

LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
MATH251
Dec 17, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Worst math lecturer I've ever encountered. worst TA out there. If you have her please just drop, save yourself a headache. maybe she's a good person, but definitely a bad professor. lecture is boring and not useful, most of the time looking to the board and writing.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
1.0
3.0
CALC251
Grade: C+
Dec 28, 2018
Wouldn't take again

When she said there is no curve, she isn't lying. She didn't curve a single point. What's sad is that on our second midterm the average was a 54, yet she still didn't see it was necessary to curve that? I put my heart and soul into this class and I was not rewarded with what I deserved. This class killed my GPA, thanks to an awful professor.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
4.0
CALC251
Grade: B
Dec 28, 2018
Wouldn't take again

What a mistake it was to take her class. Her lecture is one of the most disorganized at Rutgers, not to mention her handwriting is illegible at times. Her teaching consists of dumping out the information without caring if the students actually understood it. By the end of the semester, about 25 of 80 students came to lecture. Just use the textbook.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
1.0
5.0
MATH251
Jan 28, 2019
Wouldn't take again

terrible. save yourself. lectures are unclear, she is constantly confused. the exam averages were in the 50s and she didnt feel the need to curve at all. half the class failed and she couldnt care less. whoever is saying she is a good lecturer was either paid by her or was done by her herself.

Tough Grader
3.0
4.0
CALC251
Grade: A
Apr 6, 2019
Would take again

I found her lectures to be useful and was able to learn from them, but I know that many people thought she went too fast, so I would say she is only good if you can keep up. She was usually helpful in office hours, but I did once see her laugh at a student's poor attempt at a Maple Lab. There are 5 Maple Labs and they are all pretty easy.

Lots of homework
Graded by few things
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

35%

Textbook Required

36%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 35 grades
Most common grades:
A (13)
Not sure yet (9)
C (5)
Grade Distribution
A(14)B(7)C(7)D(0)F(1)A-/B+(6)
Based on 44 reported grades
A: 13
Not sure yet: 9
C: 5
B+: 5
Common Tags
Tough Grader (19)
TEST HEAVY (8)
Get ready to read (7)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (7)
LECTURE HEAVY (6)
Skip class? You won't pass. (4)
Tests are tough (4)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (4)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.08 avg change
Jul
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

151

5.0

(1)

151152251

5.0

(1)

CALC136

5.0

(1)

CALCULUS

5.0

(1)

CALC151

5.0

(2)
+37 more courses
Difficulty by Course

251

5.0

MAT135

5.0

250

4.5

CALCULUS135

4.3

135

4.0

Similar Professors