3.2
Quality3.4
Difficulty65%
Would Retake132
Reviews65%
Would Retake
132
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
29
4
37
3
33
2
20
1
13
What Students Say
“Awesome teacher but really just a great guy”
ECON001 - 5.0 rating“His lectures are not reflective of the work at all”
001 - 2.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
26%
Textbook Required
47%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.23 avg changeRatings by Course
ECON201
5.0
(1)ECON4059
5.0
(1)ECON01
4.5
(2)ECON400
4.5
(2)ECON408
3.8
(5)Difficulty by Course
MICROTHEORY
5.0
ECON
5.0
ECON101
4.3
25
4.0
ECON201
4.0
Reviews (132)
This class was horrible and unclear- needs a recit. section
No Comments
Aweome Professor
Either I'm stupid or he's a bad teacher.
I have so much more to learn, but so far it's been a blast.
Very fair and logical
Very funny and makes micro theory a little bit bearable with his witty comments. The class is hard as hell, but he does a good job at teaching it thoroughly. Definitly one of the hotter econ teachers here as well. Although Ive heard Prof. Yun quite the looker...oh well cya later
take Gale
No Comments
Axel Anderson is simply the worst teacher i have ever had.
Can he click through the slides any faster? Does anyone care about the construction on his house? Why did I take his class?
Needlessly tough - and yet thats the whole idea about Econ. They're out to trick you and make you hate life.
Apathetic in general, poor personal touch. Unfair grader. Take Ian Gale or Prof. Jack if possible.
I'm not sure what the other people are talking about. He was a great teacher, but the class was pretty hard. Whenever I had a question, he was very helpful, and you don't have to get a high % on the test to get a good score. The tests were also fairly short and straightforward, and open-book.
TAKE GALE
How can you complain when his tests are open book?
Sweet name, terrible teaching style.
LOVE his class. He's funny, entertaining, and challenges you to do your best work. He's not afraid to be questioned, and actually wants his students to think outside the box about Econ. He can be a little hard to connect with, but is always helpful and available. (Be warned: his class WILL challenge you... this is NOT an easy class.)
I thought his tests were rough. The first one wasn't so bad and then the second one blindsided us. Watch out for the kiss-ass kids, he likes them.
definitely recommend!
Axel's class is hard, there's no getting around that. At the beginning, you're going to want to kill him cause the first exam is impossible. But if you sign on to what he's doing, he'll push you and by the end, you'll learn a lot and you'll really appreciate him. Plus, the curve is actually decent. Unique sense of humor too...
Not an easy class. Study hard for the first test because it's tough but by the time you get to the final you'll find that you've really learned a lot. As hard as he is, he's also pretty funny, interesting, and really loves his subject. Take if you want to learn and don't mind working to do so.
Prof Anderson is a great guy, but his class was a little unorganized and it can be tough to follow his thoughts. He likes you to "figure stuff out on yourself", which can be frustrating. The curve is your best friend.
Difficult, especially if you haven't taken econ before. Willing to answer questions, but not sure how helpful he is outside of class. Seems kinda cocky, but he's hot.
Great teacher. Difficult, and doesn't "hold hands," though. He is very helpful, but only if you approach him. Always makes somewhat dry topics interesting through jokes/anecdotes, and understands stresses of college. Easy homework (can take long) but somewhat difficult tests, require studying. Highly Recommend.
If you have never taken Economics before or aren't that interested in it to begin with, do not take Axel! Not that he is a bad teacher, but he is inexperienced at teaching underclassmen and without prior knowledge of the subject it is hard to keep up, especially if you're a freshman and still adjusting. Research TAs, a good one will be needed.
Good professor who really wants students to succeed. Easy if you are willing to put in the work around the 2 midterms, finals, and problem sets (the majority of which are pretty easy). Some TAs are FANTASTIC (including many of the undergrads), while some barely speak English, so just be careful about that. "Axel" is great, though.
Wants critical thought from students, won't hold your hand but will give you all the tools you need to do it yourself. Very funny and manages to make a giant lecture feel personal. Exams extremely difficult with generous curve.STUDY for them and work fast even when they seem like they will be easy- you will be tripped up. Axel's the man.
Straight up stud. Very smart and funny. "easiness ranking" is irrelevant since everything done relative to the econ curve (20% A 20% A-) if you're smarter than 80%, easy. Almost no work
Not a bad person, just a sub-par professor. No calculus made the class boring and confusing, and lack of connection between lectures and exams is absurd. He knows the material, just can't explain it to save his life. The fact that there was a 40 point curve on the second midterm should indicate how effective/helpful the class was.
Prof. Anderson seems better suited to an upper-level course. He didn't provide enough substantive homework to bridge the huge gap between theory and application. Otherwise, he was not a terrible professor, but I didn't appreciate his snide e-mails that seemed to insult students that didn't understand the material. Also, undergrad TA's are useless.
Exams have NOTHING to do with the material in class. Loved the 60 point curve !
this semester was worse than the time the raccoon got in the copier. id rather get a footjob from hillary clinton than ever take his class again.
Do not take Axel for intro classes! He is obviously really smart and a cool dude, but terrible at explaining basic concepts. Worse, exam questions basically come out of nowhere so it's almost impossible to study (luckily there is a massive curve). Pick a good TA, the undergrads are usually not helpful.
Very clearly an interesting and entertaining guy, but not a professor for basic Micro. I sincerely thought I understood what he was saying in class, and could generally work through the homework, but exams were quite possibly the most confusing and frustrating that I've ever taken. The curve definitely helps, but you never know what to expect.
No continuity in this course. Despite the fact that lectures were all theory, exams were pretty much entirely math-based and hard, making this class very difficult and frustrating. Prof Anderson provides the bare minimum amount of information and expects students to surmise the rest. Too much to ask.
Professor Anderson either delivers an excellent lecture or an incredibly confusing one. The exams are very difficult.
Liked him better than a lot of people in the class. He doesn't spoon feed you econ because it's HARD to spoon feed econ. If you read the assigned chapters before lecture, his lectures were excellent. They clarified the difficult parts. Do some practice problems outside of class and the exams are hard but doable. Curve helps. Great in office hours.
I wanted to be his best friend, but I wouldn't take a class with him again. He had never taught an undergrad course before this semester and it showed--he expected us to inferentially learn a LOT on our own. He loves asymmetric information, which is actually very interesting, but almost incomprehensible at intro level. Never gave practice problems.
Anderson's theory-based lectures were completely useless because the midterms and finals were mostly math, and the homework usually did not help in preparation for tests. The curve really helps, so just hope that you're in the top 40% of the class.
Took Econ Principles Mirco with him. Teaches concepts, but does not give much practice problems. TAs are not very good, but you can teach yourself the course as long as you are willing to put the time into it. Lectures and Sections are not mandatory, but going to lecture can be helpful to learn material
If you have taken AP Micro, this class is a joke. 2010 was his first year dropping to intro from upper level therefore his course material was more detailed and less representative of broad based micro economics (ie Asymmetric information). He is not as bad as these rating make him out to be, just make sure you go to TA sessions for practice.
Maybe if this class was his fantasy football team he'd put more effort into it.
An interesting guy. His lectures were not as clear as they could be but they were interesting and he has a great sense of humor. The exams were hard but with the curve it's easy to do well. My TA was great, but the other's weren't so helpful. Overall, he probably isn't the best intro teacher, but that class was fine.
Look. He wants people to be challenged and to learn on their own. But would it kill him to show us the math/application behind the theories BEFORE the day before the test? I mean if the math isn't in the book, the slides, or the homework (or the lectures), it's not exactly fair game. ECON 001 was way harder than it should have been. Avoid Axel.
The TA review sessions were not very helpful at all. The class was incredibly difficult and the homework does not prepare you at all. Axel is an awesome person who is incredibly smart and knows his material very well. However, he is not a good professor for an intro level class because he did a poor job at explaining the broader concepts.
Honestly, hes not that bad a guy. Yes the tests were hard, but theres a reason that he has an EXTREMELY generous curve and test policy. What many people dont realize, is the top 40% get A's and the next 40% get B's. Overall, he could have showed us applications/math more, but he was a fair grader
Anderson obviously didn't want to be teaching Micro. He openly said he hated teaching a principles course, and he made the class painful for everyone. Yes the curve was generous, but definitely take a professor who wants to teach the students, not someone who's just doing it because the registrar is making him
I highly recommend taking his class. He actually challenges you, but his exams are not impossible. If people take sometime to get help during his office hours instead of constantly complaining, then they will be fine. Read the book, attend the office hours, and the exam review sessions. The best economics class of the 4 I have taken.
He really cares about students and is very helpful during office hours.
Anderson is great so far. Really helpful, engaging in class -- actually makes an intro class fantastic. Take him for micro. He definitely cares about the success of his students, and is generally awesome.
Professor Anderson wants his students to be able to do far more than he teaches. He could really do much more with examples before tests, because the test questions are far more difficult than material covered in class or problem sets. Wouldn't take him again.
Easy. Though homework and tests not representative of lectures. Never went to recitation. Still EASY
Very helpful if you seek him out, makes the lectures relatively entertaining. Final was ridiculously easy.
Overall pretty good. Grading was fair, material was interesting if a bit convoluted. He's helpful if you seek him out. Don't take 408 if you're not comfortable with a very theoretical and math-heavy course.
Interesting jokes make dry lectures more amusing. You have to feel his sense of humor to enjoy the class, but overall a good teacher and definitely sparked my interest in econ.
Professor Anderson (compared to his past reviews at least) must've gotten A LOT better at the whole professor thing. His sense of humor is great and he is very clear with his expectations. Tests reflected the homework and practice tests he had given us as well as the questions from class, making them easy to study for. Take him for Micro!!!
Axel is great for ECON-408. There is a decent chunk of math involved, but he is very clear if you ask him to explain things in more detail. No textbook. The exams are completely open book (you can use notes, laptop, etc.), so it's not so difficult to do well. Near the end, I was starting to lose interest... but, overall, an interesting class.
Axel is young and a fun professor, especially for an economist. He sometimes makes jokes in his lectures, which kept me awake and coming back. Graded on a curve, so it is not difficult to do well if you go to lecture and do the online homework
Tough, fair, funny. Good Class
He's a funny lecturer and his powerpoints are all online, homework is super easy, and there is a decent curve. Not the most fascinating or easy class for a non-econ person, but you can get a decent grade and he's very helpful and cares about his students.
Prof. Anderson is a decent lecturer, and his jokes make micro a little more bearable. Sometimes the homework doesn't always line up with what he's lectured on, and it's not always clear what he wants you to know. Tests can be confusing, but he gives you plenty of practice tests, which are very similar to the actual tests.
The one thing that messed up my grade was his grading criteria, because I handed in the 2nd midterm when I shouldn't have (you can basically skip all the tests except the final). 2 midterms, 1 final. What I mean to say is that if you think you did bad on a midterm, don't hand it in, because he won't drop the lower of the two like other profs would.
Funny and interesting lectures, keeps them short and lets you out early if he thinks you covered enough material for the day. Willing to go over lots and lots and is super helpful in his office hours. If you have a good handle on the material, you don't really need to go to class, which I appreciate. Great professor!
His lectures are not reflective of the work at all. He likes to talk (and talk and talk and talk) about the theories and concepts behind economics more than actually teach you how to solve problems like the ones that appear on homework, tests, and what you'll actually need to do well in Econ.
I quickly came to dread this class. The lectures are long, boring and confusing and the tests cover barely anything that the lectures do. After people did well on the Midterm 1 he made the 2nd one nearly impossible and barely anyone turned it in. Odds are you'll have him for Micro so make sure to take the practice tests, the real ones are similar.
Pretty typical class. He makes the lectures interesting but they are otherwise very standard. Regular homework assignments but you can get full credit just for trying.
Axel's lectures are really a waste of time and the only point in going is if you want to get the iClicker questions. His lectures are quite boring and are only rarely helpful for assignments and tests. Homework is easy and you can get full points for just trying. Tests are hard but they are very similar to the numerous practice tests he uploads.
Anderson is an amazing person. He is very clear and knows what he want you to learn. He is also very helpful out class. Homework is not tough. He usually gives very helpful practice tests for you to prepare for real tests. Definitely take him!
Typical large lecture class. Breezes over material during the lectures; take advantage of office hours and the TAs. Beware of asking questions during the lecture - he is not very direct sometimes. He knows that the material can be dull sometimes, so he tries his best to spice it up. Two midterms, online homework, and a final exam.
40% of the class receives an A or A-. He posts all of his lectures online, so even if you find one day's class unclear, you can review it. Reviews before the exams (two midterms, one test) are very representative of the material. Around 3 iClicker questions per class, but you can work with neighbors. He's a funny guy and makes Micro enjoyable
Axel does his best to make dry material more interesting, go to lectures for the clicker questions. Homework is easy but is not representative of midterm/final questions. Those are based off lecture iclicker questions and practice papers which he uploads. Had to work for it but getting an A is very doable.
I've already taken AP Econ, so people who don't have an econ background are already at a disadvantage. Just focus on the practice tests, and make sure you understand the concepts and you'll be okay. I can see how this class could be tough for people w/o an econ background, but there are resources available for help if you search it out.
Pretty much as good as it gets for a 300 person lecture. Practice tests help a lot. The curve really helps so that nobody gets lower than a B-. You have unlimited tries on homework, but the tests aren't reflective of the homework at all. The final is so easy, all multiple choice.
Axel's personality makes the lectures entertaining at the least, but he's a bit awkward one-on-one. Midterms and final are easy if you understand the concepts, so get help from TAs or friends if you're struggling.
Lectures are long and can get boring pretty fast. Anderson spends a lot of time in lecture on policies that are not really tested. The homework questions can be confusing because they weren't gone over in class. Hope that you get a great TA that is able to help you.
Axel is a funny/ongoing lecturer, but some times it feels as if his lectures (300+) drag. He assigns homework on MyEconLab, you have unlimited tries, gives 2 midterms/1 final and "attendance" is taken through iClicker quizzes!
Overall a decent class. Professor Anderson is funny and makes his lectures as entertaining as an econ lecture can be. Two midterms and one final. Midterms are optional. First was pretty easy, but the second was very difficult. Final was so-so, but is all multiple choice. Homework's extremely easy and you really only need to skim the readings.
Micro with Anderson for me was a pretty standard entry level class. Not too challenging, provided you show up to all the lectures. Don't buy the textbook. Save yourself the $200.
Micro with Anderson was a large 300-person lecture class. The second midterm was pretty hard, though overall the class wasn't too bad. Showing up to recitation and working through the past exams will help you succeed. Tests are mathy.
The reason this class can be tough is really the subject more than the professor. He is pretty clear in lectures and the tests are based on his lectures so to do well you need to pay attention. Really happy to help clarify things if you ask as well.
Had Professor Anderson for Micro, he's good at teaching the material and his powerpoints and practice exams were very helpful for the exams.
You know what. For me, this class is interesting. I took AP Econ and got 5 but choose not to replace it(International student whose native language is not English wants to get used to US education and a good GPA first). But I ended up getting a B+. Is it because of me? I don't know.
Axel's a funny guy but his class wasn't anything special. Most of the outside help you get will be from your TAs. He posts old tests online and the homework grade is a guaranteed 100%. His downfall is that he only shows graphs during lecture and never explains much beyond that. iClicker questions make skipping lecture annoying.
Anderson is overall a good professor. His lectures can be boring, but he's a funny guy and is always willing to answer questions in lecture and at office hours. Attendance is optional, but he gives iClicker questions during most lectures. Extremely clear grading breakdown between midterms, homework, and final.
The homework was a joke, and all of the classes focused on theory, while the tests were focused on math. Learning the math was the toughest part of the class, but after that, it was totally fine.
Easy class. He uploads everything you need on blackboard so you don't even have to go to the lectures. Study the past exams and you can easily get an A by investing about 4 hours before the midterms and final.
Best professor I had my entire freshman year. Class isn't easy but if you put in the work the curve really helps you out. Recitations aren't mandatory and you have multiple attempts on the homework to get 100%.
This was pretty solid Micro class. Axel is funny, and makes the material easy. It won't change your life, but it's pretty good
Intro Econ teachers get hated on for no reason. Axel was great. Funny, straight-forward, and his tests were fair. Tip for freshmen: will let you skip the midterms, and if you are really unprepared, just skip it. the final is easier anyways
Axel gets flamed a lot for no real reason: hes a solid prof for an intro level economics course. Hes pretty funny during lectures and there are lots of resources (TAs, piazza, office hours) if you get stuck on some of the concepts. The one thing about his course is that he says you dont need to use the textbook, but doing so really helps.
Axel is underrated on here and here's why- homeboy's teaching a 300+ person intro class at a university that's not only highly competitive but which requires all the econ classes to be curved so only 20% of these hoyas can actually get As! Class will be hard regardless of prof. Axel is a dog- great teacher, accessible, very funny, would recommend.
I loved Axel as a man; he's okay as a professor. He spits conventional wisdom in front of 300 people twice a day, and it's a difficult class, but you will learn if you show up. TAs and Axel himself are happy to answer questions. Study hard and prepare for the tests early and often.
I love Axel. The curve sucks and the class is competitive. Iclicker quizzes and homework are super easy but the tests are very difficult. Class is entertaining and he is good at explaining the concepts.
People love to trash him, but his lectures were very clear and he's accessible outside of class. My one issue is that his tests didn't reflect his homework, which didn't reflect the lectures. Overall, a solid econ01 professor and his jokes alone made lecture worth it. My advice is to attend his office hours if possible, they're really helpful.
Axel's hella funny. The jokes are often corny and dumb but it's the only way to make an hour and a half of intro to micro bearable so I'm not complaining at all. The homework doesn't match the iclicker or exam questions, but he posts old exams for practice. The TA I had was really smart, and I think a lot of the other TA's were good too.
Axel is a treat in lecture but his tests not so much. The homework is easy and the in-class iClicker questions really help cushion your grade in preparation for its inevitable collapse come midterms and finals. There are two midterms but he has a reasonable policy on skipping them. His class can be boring but that's just the material, not him.
I've never taken econ before but Anderson was a fine professor. Is prepared for lectures and puts his slides online but doesn't always explain things thoroughly and ends up glossing over key ideas. He's funny & makes dry lectures somewhat entertaining with his sense of humor. No need to buy the textbook - Anderson admits to not opening it in years
Axel is funny and not a bad guy, but the class isn't great. He doesn't explain concepts as clearly as they would need to be to understand the math and calculations that appear on exams, which are hardly anything like the homework. TAs can be good or bad so it's really a toss up. Not the worst professor, but I wasn't in love with the course.
I love him as a person not a as a professor. His tests are very mathematical while his lectures only cover the theories and concepts. I have never taken econ in high school, so this course was very challenging since he expects many students to have experience beforehand.
Graded on a curve so you don't really know how well you're doing till the end. Homework is completion, recitations are optional. You have to actually understand the concepts to do well on tests, but there's tons of practice material. Only reason to go to lecture is iclicker. Axel is funny and great out of class, but 300 person lecture isn't great.
His lectures were not helpful, and you have to teach it all to yourself. He was also not very empathetic and kind toward students; seemed to pride himself on being tough/unsympathetic and mocked those falling behind, which was discouraging when students were genuinely trying to do well but falling short.
Axel Anderson is a good person, yet an average professor. His lectures move much too quickly to understand every concept he's trying to teach. You will learn a few things if you do attend class, but the questions for the two midterms and final are extremely similar to the online practice exams. Study those thoroughly, even more so than his notes.
not a great professor you'll have to self-teach most of the material
Awesome teacher but really just a great guy. Someone I connected with. Felt like I truly formed a bond with this man. Invited him to Booeys... no response. Knows the material. Truly an economic wizard. I advise you take this class and he will inspire you and lead you into the economic world. Best teacher in America, but really, a best friend.
Attendance is completely optional since you'll teach yourself for the tests anyway. If he tells you not to worry about a question, ignore him and figure it out as it will be on the midterm. As a person, Axel is clearly the goat: cracks jokes constantly, bears a slight resemblance to Michael Scott, and makes homework assignments wildly easy.
Incoming freshmen: take your AP tests so you can avoid the introductory micro course. I went and talked to Axel in January to see my December final, and the questions I got wrong were missed by 80-90% of the class. He quite literally said he "should have worded the question better because it was unclear". You'll be teaching yourself if you take him
Micro is boring, but if you have to take it Axel is fine. He's an interesting guy and his lectures are alright, but you'll teach yourself a lot of stuff for the exams, which are exactly like the practice exams he gives you. Don't bother getting the textbook, I never read it. Midterms are optional.
Not great
agree w below: as a person axel is the goat. as a prof, not so much. he explains concepts assuming you already know them despite this being an intro class. best way to study is by looking at old exams. taught myself most of the material - went from a B to an A- on midterms w a LOT of studying. curve is wildly helpful but dont rely on it.
All economics classes are hard, but Axel at least makes it fun. If you use past tests to study you'll be fine. The tests change very little year to year and the final is non-cumulative. Overall a hilarious professor. Definitely the best choice for intro econ.
Axel is pretty good for intro Micro. The class wasn't too difficult. His lectures can be boring and difficult to pay attention to, but so is every intro econ lecture. He seems to be very accessible and kind. He is also hilarious. Take Axel if you can.
Axel is the best Econ professor I've ever met so far! To pass with flying color is fairly easy since you only need to go through the lecture slides and the past exams which he gave you (no need for textbook). The real tests are ALMOST EXACTLY the same as the past ones. I hate Econ but Axel made everything really easy for me!
Axel is a funny guy, but lectures are pretty dry which is not so much his fault since micro is a pretty tragic class (in my opinion). It's really easy to zone out. The tests are worth a lot and can be pretty challenging. That being said, he gives you a lot of past tests to practice with and has a lot of office hours.
Axel is a funny guy, and I like him as a person. However, lectures are confusing and dry, and the two midterms were way too long for time allotted. Still possible to do well with the curve, but getting an A can be hard. Lets you skip midterms instead of dropping worst score like other micro prof., which seems nice but punishes people who take both.
Axel Anderson is very funny. He teaches the material well and is very fair when it comes to grades. The tests can be very hard. Since this is a big lecture class and there is a lot of material to cover, usually the tests include problems that we have never covered before so study very hard and do the practice tests he gives.
In spite of going to his office hours regularly, often alone, see never learned my name. Seems to have little care for his students, but maybe thats just due to the impersonal lecture-style classes. The class is very hard. Homework is graded for completion but exams are very hard and he likes a low class average. Would not take him for micro.
Not a bad choice for micro! He explains things really clearly and provides a ton of materials to help you prepare for exams (including previous exams).
Pretty funny lecturer, though pacing can be too fast sometimes and too slow at others. Homework is frequent, easy, and your best learning tool. He gives you previous exams/answers and exams never stray far from that (and he lets you use a cheat sheet)! The curve makes it pretty easy to get an A if you put in the work.
It's clear that Axel has been teaching Micro for a long time and knows the tricks of the trade. Super thorough and gave plenty of practice problems, so it was easy to know what to expect on the exams. Best online professor I had in the second half of the semester.
Anderson is a great prof. This was one of my favorite courses at Georgetown so far and I was so disappointed when classes went online because I actually looked forward to attending class. He is hilarious to me but not everyone's cup of tea. He makes the material interesting and easy to digest. This class made me consider switching to an Econ major.
Lectures were interesting, funny, engaging, and well explained. Good guy that is easy to talk to. Very fair. Great for intro-micro: would recommend.
Axel himself is pretty funny and all homework is not graded for accuracy (you can keep trying until you get a 100). But if you don't easily understand Econ or have not taken it in the past you will find this class really hard - the curve typically allows those who fail to get Bs and Cs which is a sign that you really don't learn much. Oh well.
Just don't take this class unless you have to. or you know you are good at econ. if not, i truly wish you luck
does not know how to teach. a 51 on the curve was legit a B- because everyone did so bad. he literally is the worst professor I have ever come across in my entire life. no clue what he is doing up on the stage, only take this class if you want a semester of confusion and a C on your transcript.
DO NOT TAKE PROF ANDERSON. Wait a semester and take it with another one, even Prof. Anderson's own TAs agreed with that. His lectures do not correlate with the tests, and the practice test answers are often incorrect so it is VERY difficult to study. He is very inconsiderate, and likes to make things difficult for his students.
Took Prof. Anderson for the upper-level game theory elective. Overall he's a great lecturer who is clear at explaining concepts. The material itself is a bit challenging, but if you pay attention in class you will do fine on the exams. Looks cold on the outside but in fact he is pretty charming and caring.
Prof. Anderson made me want to switch my major to Econs. His exam questions are unique, asking you to put in effort to study to understand the concepts well. The exam answer key is rarely inaccurate. Instead, the questions are so tricky that you could think the key is wrong. Attending his OHs might help with these sorts of questions.
Professor Anderson is a TOUGH professor, but only because he sets high expectations for his students. His grading is very fair, and problem sets are graded based on effort. His exams are difficult, but he provides his students with many study materials. I look forward to taking him again for Game Theory!
The lectures are extremely confusing and none of the material actually makes sense. However, the homework is graded on completion, not accuracy, and the example midterm/final are very indicative of the real exams.
Professor Anderson sets high expectations, but his fair grading and helpful study materials make the challenge worthwhile. unstuck AI proved a valuable supplement alongside the course resources.
Axel is a terrific professor. Took him for Game Theory and he really made the class fun. Attendance isn't really mandatory, and he's super accessible. About as easy as any 4000 level econ but he's more than happy to work with students to help out. Overall if you need a class like this, or just like game theory as a concept, he's a great choice.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
26%
Textbook Required
47%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.23 avg changeRatings by Course
ECON201
5.0
(1)ECON4059
5.0
(1)ECON01
4.5
(2)ECON400
4.5
(2)ECON408
3.8
(5)Difficulty by Course
MICROTHEORY
5.0
ECON
5.0
ECON101
4.3
25
4.0
ECON201
4.0