2.2
Quality4.2
Difficulty1%
Would Retake117
Reviews1%
Would Retake
117
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
33
4
3
3
1
2
0
1
80
What Students Say
“He is a nice guy and really funny too”
HIST101 - 5.0 rating“Really great professor”
HIST102 - 5.0 ratingClass Info
Attendance Mandatory
94%
Textbook Required
71%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
C-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-1.42 avg changeRatings by Course
HISTHIST
5.0
(1)A102
5.0
(1)HISTORY101
5.0
(1)SSC101
5.0
(2)HIST200
2.9
(19)Difficulty by Course
HIST100
4.9
HIS201
4.8
HIST102
4.6
HIST0645
4.2
HIS102
4.0
Reviews (117)
yeah he talks too much and unorganized. but he knows hes information. hes nice and sweet. helpful as hell. even though he got on my nerves at times cause he just talks on and on lol take him!
Indeed he talk plenty but he's really a body of information. He's very knowledgeable and is willing to explain the topic and repeat for the students at any time. He'll definitely make you feel nervous but don't be afraid. Take Him he really knows his stuff.
He is real helpful funny,and give really good review sheets.He is the real example of teacher friendly. In my opinion from his class I get the feeling i can become a college teacher
Professor Lituchy is a wealth of information. He gives lots of notes and you have to be a speed writer. I enjoyed his class because he made me feel comfortable and the setting is relax. He is an A grade Teacher.
This Professor was clear and very informative. He is very professional and pleasant.
Great professor, very helpful and he knows his stuff. He is willing to work with his students whenever they need it.
Great professor who is very knowledgable in his field. He gives a lot of information but is very willing to help his students acheive an A grade. Very funny and nice guy.
Best professor I've ever had, he's the real deal. Friendly, understanding, informative and professional. He definitely have the qualities and is An example of a great prof.
great teacher!!!!! knows what he is talking about
He is a nice guy and really funny too. He makes everything interesting. If you have the chance take one of his classes.
Really great professor. Makes history interesting with his clear delivery. Very informative. Also understanding and willing to help students who need it.
He is such a super guy. He is really funny and makes everything interesting and will go out of his way to help you out if you have a problem. If you have the opportunity you should take his class.
This Professor is one of he best in the school. He really clarifies every topic that he is discussing. I would suggest not missing class so you can go over your notes for the exam. Do not be discouraged by all the questions he gives( its over 25 fill in answers).
It's amazing how time fast. Lituchy, you're a nice professor. I will recommend you to any other students in the school. Thank you for sharing your wisdom. I hope to see you one day.
He is very helpful to his students. He really cares. He is one of the best history professors around.
At first I was not thrilled about taking history at all. But after being in his class he made it so interesting. I totally agree with the past comments--he really cares and want you to learn. One of the best professors in MEC:)
Great Professor!You must attend all his classes to get a good grade. His lectures will be on the test. So take notes and study. And do final paper. His lectures are so good and interesting, that you will find yourself forgetting to take notes..lol.
I took him for US history. And had no intrest ing learning it UNTIL I MET PROF L. He is amazing. And cares for his students. I got a A+ . I wouldn't reccommend him to a lazy student because his review sheets has about 100 questions and he picks 25 for a test
Very great Proffessor,Never had a Professor that enjoys teaching as much as him.... Just take plenty of notes for his exams and attend his classes.
His knowledge on history is amazing, He came to class even when he was stoned sick, and did a phenominal job! His exams were easy, as he gave out review as to what would be on the exams!
Teacher gives a lot of notes. You have to be there everyday to pass midterm/final.Gives long study guides like 100 questions but only puts 25 on the midterm/final test plus bonus questions so u can get a 130% on your test. STUDYING IS A MUST OR YOU WILL FAIL!
This man is a learned academic. Knows his discipline down to the letter. Yeah, he'll give a huge list of questions just to scare you into studying. Just ask for an outline of the exam and ask every single question you need answered in AND out of class. He's pretty helpful. Also his grading scheme is weird so you'll do better than you expect.
awesomne take him u won't be sorry.
The best professor i've had EVER and i'm a junior. His knowledge and interest in this subject is phenomenal. You'd leave this class wishing you had him for every subject. Register for his class now!!!!
Attend every class, take good notes, study for exams and he will leave you rushing to find him for another history class. His classes fill up fast so be quick.
Very helpful, easy to understand and class was never boring.
he is very passionate. an excellent teacher wish I could get him for history 200. you will learn from his class
Amazing professor. Very knowledgeable and open to answer all questions. He doesn't mind learning from his students. Tests are packed with info but he lets you know EXACTLY what will be on them. Takes attendance but it doesn't affect your grade. Is very accesible via phone, email and even text message. Would take him again
very good professor he will help you out any way he can attend class and take notes you will need them for his exam
amazing professor. I feel like I'm in a theater during lecture. enjoyed both hist classes with him. understandable of student circumstances. take notes or record his lectures and study em and get A+. the exam is 25 Qs. answer 16 you get A+. he give u 100 question from his lecture and he choose 25 of em. always make-up exams no need for excuse.
worst professor ever he teach of his head and reading from his own notes and make buy a text book that he don'y used in class. he teach mixed up. i know how people can say best class this my last time taking rate my professor.
My major query with him is no multiple choice. His tests are based on answering over 15 to 25 questions. As he gives you the questions on the tests, write them down the same day. He's a cool guy though. Can reach him any how, even on Xmas lol. Go to class to pass the tests
He is an awesome professor, his lectures are pretty long. But write almost everything down and study it. You will be fine.
Prof. Lituchy was great! He knows his History and really teaches. He gives a lot of notes but you end up learning a lot in his class. I loved him, one of my favorite classes!!
This professor is amazing!!!!!! I recommend him. Show up to class and you will PASS.
The worst Professor, Will never take him again.
Lituchy doesn't waste time in his class, he never uses slides. He has his notes and he sometimes he provides notes on the board. Most of the time he talks. His test are all written response. Some questions on the test are hard and specific. Reading the book will definitely help pass the test. He's very clear and you will learn a lot in his class.
he was a disappointment. Lectures lacked coherence, making it impossible to follow. Grading seemed arbitrary, and feedback was minimal. Office hours were elusive, leaving students with no help. think twice before enrolling!
Unfortunately, he left much to be desired. Lecture delivery lacked enthusiasm, making the material uninteresting. Unclear expectations and inconsistent grading added frustration. More clarity and engagement are essential for a better learning atmosphere.
Lectures lacked structure and depth, making it challenging to follow. Poor communication and unresponsiveness hindered clarification on course content. Inconsistent grading and vague feedback added to the frustration. Hoping for improvement in teaching methods for future students.
He is a supporter of genocide.
The professor truly listened to my concerns about the course and met me where I was, allowing me to continue learning and growing within his classroom. I wholeheartedly recommend him. I truly hope all professors can follow his inspiring example.
Friendly and approachable, but some lecture topics weren't clearly explained. Providing more context and examples would make understanding easier.
A very polite and supportive person, though exam questions sometimes covered material not emphasized in class. Focusing on main concepts would feel fairer.
Genuinely encouraging, yet grading feedback was brief. More detailed comments would help students identify strengths and areas for improvement.
Always respectful and kind, but slides were often text-heavy and hard to follow. Simplifying visuals would make note-taking and comprehension easier.
A considerate and professional individual, though deadlines occasionally shifted unexpectedly. Maintaining consistent timelines would help with planning.
Friendly and well-intentioned, yet participation grading criteria weren't fully explained. Clearer guidelines would help students engage confidently.
Polite and approachable, but lectures sometimes moved too quickly. Slowing down to emphasize key points would aid retention and understanding.
Genuinely nice and supportive, though office hours were limited. Consistent availability would make it easier for students to seek help.
Always respectful and courteous, but project instructions were occasionally vague. Including detailed examples would clarify expectations.
Friendly and professional, yet some exams emphasized minor details not clearly discussed in class. Focusing on key concepts would feel fairer.
A very polite and approachable person, though some lectures felt a bit unstructured. Clearer outlines or summaries would help students follow the material more easily.
Friendly and respectful, but feedback on assignments was minimal. Providing more detailed comments would help students understand how to improve.
Genuinely supportive, yet some slides were densely packed with text. Simplifying visuals and highlighting main points would improve comprehension.
Always courteous and professional, but deadlines occasionally changed with little notice. Maintaining consistent timelines would reduce stress.
Kind and well-intentioned, though participation grading could be clearer. Explaining criteria would allow students to engage with confidence.
A genuinely nice person, but exams sometimes included material not emphasized in class. Focusing on main concepts would make assessments fairer.
Friendly and patient, yet lectures occasionally moved too quickly. Slowing down to review key ideas would enhance understanding.
Polite and encouraging, but some assignments lacked detailed instructions. Including examples or rubrics would clarify expectations.
Genuinely supportive and kind, though lecture transitions between topics were abrupt. Clearer organization would make the material easier to follow.
Friendly and considerate, but slides were sometimes cluttered and hard to read. Simplifying and summarizing would aid comprehension.
A genuinely nice individual, though exam content occasionally felt disconnected from class discussions. Aligning tests with lectures would help students prepare.
Courteous and approachable, yet participation grading felt subjective. Explaining how points are awarded would make evaluations clearer.
Very polite and approachable, though some lectures felt fast-paced. Slowing down to emphasize main points would help students retain information.
Friendly and supportive, yet grading sometimes lacked detailed explanations. Providing constructive feedback would help students learn from mistakes.
Genuinely well-intentioned, but slides were text-heavy and hard to follow. Clearer visuals and summaries would improve understanding.
Always courteous and professional, though deadlines occasionally shifted unexpectedly. Consistent timelines would help students plan better.
Kind and respectful, yet participation grading criteria weren't fully explained. More clarity would encourage confident engagement.
Friendly and approachable, but assignments sometimes lacked clear instructions. Including examples or rubrics would help clarify expectations.
A genuinely nice person, yet exams occasionally emphasized material not discussed in class. Focusing on main concepts would make assessments fairer.
Polite and supportive, but office hours were limited. Consistent availability would make it easier to get assistance when needed.
Always respectful and professional, though lecture organization could be improved. Clear outlines and summaries would enhance learning.
Friendly and considerate, but grading feedback was brief. More detailed comments would help students understand how to improve.
A kind and approachable instructor, yet some lectures jumped between topics too quickly. Slower pacing would improve comprehension.
Very polite and well-intentioned, though slides sometimes contained too much information at once. Simplifying them would make note-taking easier.
Genuinely supportive and respectful, but exam questions sometimes included minor details not emphasized in class. Focusing on key topics would feel fairer.
Friendly and approachable, yet assignments occasionally lacked clear purpose. Explaining the relevance would make work more meaningful.
Polite and professional, but some class discussions lacked structure. Providing guidance would help students participate more effectively.
Very polite and approachable, but some lectures moved too quickly. Slowing down to review key ideas would enhance understanding.
Friendly and respectful, yet slides were sometimes cluttered and difficult to follow. Simplifying visuals would improve comprehension.
Genuinely supportive and kind, but participation grading criteria weren't fully explained. Clearer guidelines would help students engage confidently.
Always courteous and professional, though deadlines occasionally changed without notice. Consistent scheduling would help with planning.
A considerate and well-intentioned individual, yet exam questions sometimes included material not emphasized in class. Aligning assessments would be beneficial.
Friendly and approachable, but assignments sometimes lacked detailed instructions. Including examples or rubrics would clarify expectations.
Genuinely respectful and professional, but slides were text-heavy. Simplifying content and highlighting key points would aid comprehension.
Kind and encouraging, though lecture transitions between topics were occasionally abrupt. Clearer organization would make the material easier to follow.
A genuinely nice person, but some exams emphasized minor details not clearly discussed in class. Focusing on main concepts would make assessments fairer.
Friendly and well-intentioned, yet lectures occasionally jumped between topics too quickly. Slower pacing would improve comprehension.
Polite and supportive, but project instructions were sometimes vague. Including more detailed examples would clarify expectations.
Genuinely kind and approachable, though some class discussions lacked structure. Providing guidance would help students participate more effectively.
Friendly and polite, but some lectures moved too quickly to fully absorb the material. Slower pacing and summaries would help students retain information.
A genuinely supportive and approachable person, yet slides were sometimes cluttered. Simplifying content would improve comprehension.
Always courteous and professional, though grading feedback on assignments was brief. More detailed comments would help students grow academically.
Kind and respectful, but participation grading criteria weren't fully explained. Clear guidelines would make evaluations feel fairer.
Friendly and well-intentioned, yet deadlines occasionally shifted unexpectedly. Consistent scheduling would aid students in planning their work.
Genuinely polite and supportive, though exams sometimes included questions not emphasized in class. Aligning assessments with lecture material would be helpful.
Always approachable and considerate, but some assignments lacked detailed instructions. Providing examples or rubrics would clarify expectations.
A kind and professional individual, yet lecture organization could be improved. Clear outlines and summaries would enhance learning.
Friendly and respectful, though slides were often text-heavy. Simplifying and highlighting key points would make note-taking easier.
Genuinely supportive and courteous, yet some exams emphasized minor details not stressed in class. Focusing on main concepts would be fairer.
Polite and approachable, but lecture transitions between topics were abrupt at times. Clearer organization would make learning smoother.
Friendly and supportive, though office hours were limited. Predictable availability would allow better access to guidance.
A genuinely nice person, but some lectures moved too quickly. Slowing down would help students grasp key ideas more effectively.
Polite and considerate, yet some assignments lacked clarity. Including examples or rubrics would make expectations more transparent.
Always respectful and approachable, though slides were dense and hard to follow. Simplifying visuals would aid comprehension.
Friendly and well-intentioned, yet exams sometimes included material not fully discussed in class. Aligning tests with lectures would be helpful.
Genuinely supportive and professional, but lecture discussions occasionally lacked structure. Clear guidance would improve participation.
Kind and polite, yet deadlines sometimes changed unexpectedly. Consistent timelines would help students plan effectively.
Always approachable and considerate, though grading feedback was brief. More detailed comments would aid student improvement.
Friendly and supportive, yet slides were sometimes cluttered. Simplifying and emphasizing key points would help understanding.
A genuinely respectful and kind person, but exams occasionally emphasized minor details not highlighted in class. Focusing on key concepts would feel fairer.
Polite and well-intentioned, yet lecture pacing sometimes felt too fast. Slower explanations and summaries would enhance comprehension.
Always courteous and professional, though assignments occasionally lacked detailed instructions. Including examples would clarify expectations.
Friendly and considerate, yet office hours were inconsistent. Reliable times would make it easier for students to get help.
Genuinely supportive and approachable, but participation grading felt subjective. Clearer criteria would encourage confident engagement.
Kind and polite, though lecture organization could be improved. Clear outlines or summaries would make material easier to follow.
Class Info
Attendance Mandatory
94%
Textbook Required
71%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
C-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-1.42 avg changeRatings by Course
HISTHIST
5.0
(1)A102
5.0
(1)HISTORY101
5.0
(1)SSC101
5.0
(2)HIST200
2.9
(19)Difficulty by Course
HIST100
4.9
HIS201
4.8
HIST102
4.6
HIST0645
4.2
HIS102
4.0