1.6
Quality4.8
Difficulty10%
Would Retake83
Reviews10%
Would Retake
83
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
83 total ratings5
11
4
0
3
1
2
0
1
71
What Students Say
“He is enthusiastic and ready to answer all the questions that students may have”
SSC101 - 5.0 rating“Professor Lituchy is the one of the BEST professor in Medgar Evers College”
HISTORY101 - 5.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
99%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
C-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-2.00 avg changeRatings by Course
SSC101
4.0
(4)HIST200
2.1
(7)HISTORY200
1.5
(11)HIS101
1.5
(15)HIST251
1.4
(19)Difficulty by Course
HIS101
4.9
HISTORY101
4.8
HIST251
4.8
HISTORY200
4.7
HIST200
4.6
Reviews (82)
He is enthusiastic and ready to answer all the questions that students may have. Easy going and refers textbook examples into your realistic lives for better understanding. I took his summer intensive class but I could have had it for longer semester. The course is not that easy but it's worth working hard for it. Overall fun times.
Professor Lituchy is a very passionate when it comes . His love for teacher is shown through his lectures and his attention to his students inquiries. His teaching style makes you feel like your actually there in the past. It was quite a trip down memory lane, so to speak. I will recommend his lecture to anyone who ask about history professors.
Professor Lituchy is the one of the BEST professor in Medgar Evers College. His passion for History is ecstatic. And his desire for his students to learn will have you very ENGAGED. His lectures will have you wanting to know alot about who you are . He is funny but straight to the point. His mission is for everyone to LOVE what History entails:))
I took this professor twice and I am about to take him again. He is a great professor. His classes consists mostly of lectures but they are fun and captivating. His exams are all short response, but if you study you will do great. You only need a 75 I think to get an A on an exam. He gives three exams, one paper. No extra credit and no homework.
Professor Lituchy is an excellent, passionate, knowledgeable, and caring teacher. His grading criteria are clear from day one. He gives you one research paper and the exact questions to his exams 2 weeks in advance. It's a lot to look up, but pace yourself. Grades are curved. Work hard and you will learn a great deal of information and be ok!
Professor Lituchy is a professor who is lenient, passionate, and knowledgeable. His grading criteria are clear when you first enter in his class. You are given a review sheet for an exam two week prior so you are able to answer and study. Do all your work and get good grades on your exam and you will be alright.
his class is easy only when you fully pay attention in his lectures. he doesn't write everything on the board. he just talks the entire lecture. so either record his voice or write down EVERYTHING he says. because everything he says comes on test. so studying from your notes will make it easy and you'll get an easy A. he makes history so interestin
for his class, you have to write 8 paper page and 3 exams. give your essay earlier so you can correct the draft and get an A on the final essay. he also makes history very understandable and so interesting. i always hated history but now i love it cause of him. he doesn't use hard vocabulary explains everything in easy words. no textbook use!
Prof. Litchuy is okay. His lectures are monotonous but it is interesting material. From time to time he likes a good laugh but then it's RIGHT BACK on track. I wouldn't take him again not because he's a bad professor but because my learning style doesn't match his teaching style.
Professor Lituchy is amazing, his lectures are very informative. Study the material he provides and do his paper and he will pass you no pressure. At first it may seem overwhelming because he is so into his lectures, but after his first exam you will see how easy his class is. Take him for History you won't regret it.
This professor is so amazing, hilarious and explains everything in fine detail. His reviews are almost exact as the exams. No homework. One term paper and finals. Very understanding and caring. Responds very quickly to emails and you can send him messages he will repost to every single one promptly I would definitely take this professor again..
good guy
Very rude.
This professor's teaching style lacked clarity, making it difficult to grasp essential course concepts. Additionally, his unapproachable demeanor created a discouraging environment for students seeking assistance or clarification. The lack of constructive feedback on assignments left many feeling frustrated and unsupported throughout the semester.
Unsatisfied with him. Inadequate communication and unclear expectations. Lectures lacked engagement, hindering learning. Feedback was minimal, and grading seemed arbitrary. Improvement needed for a more effective and supportive teaching approach.
this professor fell short of expectations. Disorganized lectures and minimal feedback made the learning experience frustrating. Lack of clarity in expectations impacted grades. Hoping for improved teaching methods in the future.
Poor communication and disorganized lectures hindered understanding. Assignments lacked clear evaluation criteria. Overall, a frustrating and unsatisfactory learning experience. Improvement in teaching methods is essential.
Regrettably, he did not meet expectations. Communication gaps and unclear instructions led to confusion. Grading inconsistency and minimal feedback impeded learning. A more structured and transparent approach is needed for a positive academic experience.
Unsatisfactory experience with this professor. Lectures lacked depth and seemed disengaged. Poorly organized course materials made learning challenging. Limited feedback on assignments hindered improvement. Hoping for a more effective teaching approach in the future.
the male professor exhibited a noticeable disinterest in fostering student engagement. His monotonous lectures failed to captivate, and the overall classroom atmosphere had a lack of enthusiasm. the professor's grading seemed arbitrary, leaving students perplexed about the evaluation criteria and hindering their ability to excel in the course.
he proved to be an ineffective educator. His teaching methods lacked coherence, causing confusion among students. Moreover, his unapproachable demeanor made seeking clarification a daunting task. The feedback on assignments was minimal, leaving many feeling adrift and unsupported throughout the academic term.
unfortunately, His teaching fell short, unclear lectures, an unapproachable demeanor, and minimal feedback left students feeling unsupported. The overall experience lacked engagement and guidance, making the course a disappointing endeavor with him as the professor.
His teaching lacked clarity, an unapproachable demeanor deterred questions, and sparse feedback left students unsupported. Overall, the course with him proved disappointing, marked by a lack of engagement and guidance.
His teaching style lacked clarity, and an unapproachable demeanor hindered student interaction. Sparse feedback left many unsupported. The overall experience with him as a professor was disappointing, marked by a lack of engagement and guidance throughout the course.
lacks effective teaching skills. His lectures are monotonous, making it difficult to stay engaged. He rarely provides constructive feedback on assignments, leaving students confused about their performance. Additionally, his dismissive attitude towards questions creates a hostile learning environment. Overall, a disappointing experience.
This professor's teaching style is uninspiring. The lectures are disorganized, causing confusion rather than clarity. Feedback on assignments is minimal, hindering learning progress. He seems disinterested and fails to foster a positive classroom atmosphere. A subpar educational experience overall.
This instructor's lectures are overly complex, causing unnecessary confusion.
He was very nasty and condescending. The class was so hectic and i regret taking it.
The lectures were often difficult to follow because the material was covered too quickly and without much clarification. While the instructor seems knowledgeable, the teaching style made the subject harder to understand. More structure and examples would greatly help students.
Lectures felt rushed and lacked clear organization, making it difficult to take effective notes. Key concepts were introduced without context, and questions during class were often brushed off instead of explained thoroughly.
Class sessions often moved from topic to topic without clear transitions, which made it challenging to connect ideas. More consistent outlines or summaries at the end of each lecture would make the material easier to follow and retain.
Assignments were graded very harshly without much feedback to explain what could be improved. Providing clearer grading criteria and specific comments would help students understand expectations and grow from their mistakes.
Exams focused heavily on small details that were not emphasized in class or on the slides. A better alignment between lectures and assessments would make studying more productive and fair.
A very kind and approachable person, but the project instructions were sometimes unclear, which caused a bit of confusion. Providing examples or rubrics could make expectations easier to understand.
Clearly cares about his subject, but assignments and deadlines occasionally changed on short notice. A little more consistency would make the course smoother for students.
Always respectful and patient, though grading feedback took a while to receive. Returning work sooner would help students apply suggestions and improve their performance.
Has a pleasant attitude and genuinely tries to help, though office hours were sometimes difficult to attend due to changes in schedule. More predictable times would be appreciated.
Clearly knowledgeable and passionate about the field, but it wasn't always clear how the textbook fit into the lessons. Integrating readings into lectures could make studying more cohesive.
A thoughtful and polite professor, but exams sometimes included questions not fully discussed in class. Reviewing all test topics beforehand would help students feel more confident.
Creates a positive classroom environment and treats everyone kindly. However, participation grading could be explained more clearly so students know how to earn those points.
A genuinely nice instructor with good intentions, though slides were somewhat text-heavy and hard to follow. Simplifying them could make note-taking and comprehension easier.
Always polite and professional, but lectures occasionally moved too quickly. Slowing down a little to review main ideas would make the material easier to absorb.
A respectful and well-meaning teacher who clearly wants students to do well. However, the class sometimes felt a bit unstructured, and a clearer outline for each lecture would make learning smoother.
Very approachable and friendly, but assignments could use more detailed explanations. Offering clearer directions would make students feel more confident in their work.
A kind person with a positive attitude, though grading sometimes felt inconsistent. Sharing a detailed rubric beforehand could help everyone understand expectations.
Genuinely cares about student success, but sometimes responds slowly to emails. A quicker turnaround would make communication easier and more efficient.
Always polite and respectful, but lecture slides often repeated textbook material word-for-word. Adding more original commentary could make classes more engaging.
A considerate and professional professor who knows the material well. However, discussions could be more interactive to keep students more involved.
Clearly wants to help students learn, but exams were sometimes overly detailed compared to what was emphasized in class. A better balance would make grading feel fairer.
Always calm and patient, though feedback on assignments was brief. A few more comments on what went well or what could improve would really help students grow.
Treats students with kindness and professionalism, though the pacing of lectures was occasionally fast. Allowing a few more pauses for questions could benefit everyone.
A genuinely nice person with good intentions, but course announcements were sometimes made last-minute. Posting updates earlier would help students stay organized.
Friendly and approachable, but some lectures lacked clear transitions between topics. Summaries or brief outlines would help students follow the material more easily.
Very polite and supportive, though grading sometimes seemed harsh without detailed explanations. Providing specific feedback could help students understand their mistakes.
Always respectful and encouraging, but slides were often dense and hard to read. Simplifying visuals or highlighting key points would improve comprehension.
A kind and patient teacher, though office hours were sometimes difficult to attend. Consistent scheduling would make it easier for students to get help when needed.
Genuinely wants students to succeed, but some assignments were vague. Including examples or more detailed instructions would clarify expectations.
Friendly and well-intentioned, though exams sometimes included material not clearly covered in class. Reviewing all topics before tests would make students feel more prepared.
Polite and considerate, but participation grading criteria weren't always clear. Explaining how points are awarded would help students engage more confidently.
Always respectful and approachable, yet some lectures felt rushed. Slowing down occasionally to emphasize main points would help students retain information better.
A genuinely nice person who is passionate about the subject, but last-minute changes to deadlines made planning difficult. More advance notice would reduce stress.
Very courteous and professional, though feedback on projects was minimal. Adding constructive comments would help students improve their work and learning experience.
Friendly and considerate, but class discussions sometimes lacked clear direction. Structuring discussions more intentionally could help students engage more effectively.
Always polite and approachable, though some lecture topics were presented too quickly. Slowing down to review key points would enhance understanding.
A kind and respectful professor, but the relevance of some assignments to course objectives wasn't always clear. Clarifying purpose would make them more meaningful.
Genuinely supportive of students, yet grading feedback was occasionally brief. Providing more detailed comments could help students learn from mistakes.
Friendly and patient, though slides were often text-heavy and difficult to follow. Using clearer visuals or summaries would improve comprehension.
Very polite and professional, but deadlines sometimes changed unexpectedly. Keeping a consistent schedule would help students manage their workload.
A considerate and approachable person, yet some exams included questions not emphasized in class. Ensuring alignment would make assessments feel fairer.
Always respectful and courteous, though participation grading felt subjective. Explaining criteria clearly would help students understand expectations.
Kind and well-intentioned, but lectures occasionally jumped between topics too quickly. Slower pacing and clear transitions would make learning smoother.
Friendly and supportive, yet office hours were sometimes inconvenient or inconsistent. Providing reliable times would allow students better access to help.
Very polite and approachable, but some assignments lacked detailed instructions. Including examples or rubrics would help students understand expectations more clearly.
A genuinely nice person who encourages learning, though lecture material sometimes felt disorganized. Providing clear outlines or summaries would aid comprehension.
Always courteous and professional, but exams occasionally emphasized minor details not stressed in class. Focusing on main concepts would make assessments fairer.
Friendly and considerate, yet feedback on written work was minimal. Offering constructive comments would help students improve their skills effectively.
Genuinely supportive and patient, but slides were sometimes cluttered and hard to follow. Simplifying visuals and highlighting key points would help learning.
Very approachable and respectful, though deadlines occasionally changed without warning. More consistent scheduling would help students plan their work better.
A kind and professional person, yet class discussions sometimes lacked structure. Clearer guidance would allow students to participate more effectively.
Always polite and encouraging, but some lectures moved too quickly. Slowing down and emphasizing key concepts would improve comprehension.
Friendly and supportive, though grading sometimes felt strict without detailed explanations. Sharing more feedback would help students understand mistakes.
Genuinely well-intentioned, but office hours were not always easy to attend. More predictable availability would make it easier to get assistance when needed.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
99%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
C-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-2.00 avg changeRatings by Course
SSC101
4.0
(4)HIST200
2.1
(7)HISTORY200
1.5
(11)HIS101
1.5
(15)HIST251
1.4
(19)Difficulty by Course
HIS101
4.9
HISTORY101
4.8
HIST251
4.8
HISTORY200
4.7
HIST200
4.6