3.0
Quality3.4
Difficulty47%
Would Retake88
Reviews47%
Would Retake
88
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
21
4
19
3
10
2
21
1
17
What Students Say
“He also has a very rude and narcissitic office manner”
CALC128 - 2.0 rating“he's very intelligent but in a way that makes him hard to learn new concepts from”
CALC132 - 2.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
7%
Textbook Required
23%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
+0.11 avg changeRatings by Course
MATH127
5.0
(1)MATH128
5.0
(1)A
5.0
(1)MATH2140
5.0
(1)MATH217
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
131
4.0
MATH128
4.0
MATH132
3.9
MATH233
3.5
CALC132
3.5
Reviews (88)
this class is SO EASY. Just make sure you go and you'll NEVER HAVE TO STUDY. Seriously
Unlike a lot of professors here, Thorton will take the time to go back and re-explain something if the class doesn't understand. I won't say that you never have to study, but going to class makes it a lot easier and you don't have to try to teach yourself calculus.
Professor Thornton was irritating, fast-moving, and unhelpful in all aspects of his class. He zoomed through material making those who had even taken calc in high school need to double back to catch full topics they'd missed in his lecture. He also has a very rude and narcissitic office manner. Take it with somebody else if you can.
He does go fast but is really nice and will always go back and explain. I found him very helpful during office hours. I also was very well prepared to do the homework and take the tests.
Prof was very helpful and trys very hard. Very nice guy and great class overall. TA's were very helpful as well. Just make sure you go to class.
He has annoying speech patterns and moves very quickly in class. He refers to the entire class as "you" and often asks "do you understand?" no one who is confused ever raises their hand. He caters to the small number of top achievers in his style of teaching and leaves little room for anyone in between or struggling.
Very intelligent and funny (corny). Really goes over the material well. Is very approachable with questions and makes plenty of time and resources available for those who need help. He can go over things fast, but is willing to explain things if you speak up. Overall a great professor.
Horrible Teacher. Incoherent. Unorganized. Taught fast, without explaining. The problem was that everyone had already had the class before, so no one ever called him out on his poor teaching. The only real benefit of his class was the generous curve. I've had better teachers in high school.
great teacher, makes great class handouts everyday for the whole class where you can do practice problems and where he summarizes the day's topics.
Good teacher, but expects students to be involved during lecture. If something is unclear, make sure you let him know it, or else he'll assume everyone understands and will breeze right through the material. Does care a lot about students, though, and often will devote entire classes to review.
Good calc teacher. Clear explanation.
he's all over the place and often hard to follow in lecture. doesn't explain things very well and is almost rude when asking for help. I'm sure he's a very smart man but he was a subpar calc 1 prof.
While Thornton graded on a huge curve and actually teaches unlike many calc teachers at Wash U, he favors students who have taken calculus in high school. For those who have not, it is much more difficult to actually learn new material from him and you must seek extra help well in advance.
Professor Thornton was a great teacher. he would make sure everyone understood the concepts he taught and went slowly, also giving us worksheets to follow along and do our own problems while he taught the material. The tests aren't horrible, and he is much more approachable than other math teachers.
He's funny
he's very intelligent but in a way that makes him hard to learn new concepts from. he laughs at students when they ask questions because they sound so simple to him. also will go through entire problems just to explain that he accidentally did the entire problem wrong.
Blake's obviously super smart, but he doesn't know how to explain the math in his head to people not on his level. Take Bickel if you can (she's more of a "teacher" personality), but Thornton will definitely keep you entertained and you will learn some. The weekly struggle through webwork is great for making friends. Also, his sandals are A+
Webwork isn't bad. Graded on clicker participation so go to lecture if you end up in Thornton's class. He is often condescending and even refuses do to examples after the class has requested it. Was generally unhelpful and was a poor lecturer, and doesn't seem enthusiastic at all. Would not recommend him to anyone, because he made this class hard.
Professor Thornton is very knowledgeable but his style of teaching does not reflect this. He frequently skips out on explaining steps, saying that we can figure it out for ourselves. He also likes to focus on what he finds interesting rather than what we will actually be tested on. Tests were typically much more difficult than practice.
this class was awful. I ended up dropping after the 3rd exam because it was so difficult. test averages were very high because prof. Bickel's students would do so much better, so there wasn't really a curve. and thorton is just weird. just dont take calc with thornton
Thornton is hilarious, but don't expect to learn much. He's a better teacher than Yasha but only marginally. He often skips things and tells students to just figure it out on their own. A lot of times he writes down a bunch of stuff on the board and then turns around and asks if you understand it even though he didn't explain it at all.
Thornton cares about his students. He tries to make jokes and to engage the classroom. His worksheets/guided notes that he provides every class are excellent. His lecturing is mediocre: throughout the year he got progressively worse at conveying and explaining the calculus. USE THE TEXTBOOK if you need extra help/extra problems.
There is nothing you can do about it anyway, you have to take the class and it's given by him.
He is boring and a bad teacher
class was very unorganized, only examples with no explanation. Left me very confused all the time. After the first exam, I went to the other section of lecture and my grades improved a lot. also low key sexist. not a fan.
Bad lecturer, and he gets progressively worse as the semester goes on. He's a strange guy, and will sometimes be condescending to students. Webwork is horrific, the exams are not always very fair, overall it was a poorly taught and organized class and I learned more online than in class.
People don't always say the nicest things about Thornton but I actually started to attend his lecture rather than my professor's because I thought he was much clearer. He gives you time in class to work through examples, makes himself available outside of class, and in my opinion explains topics clearly. Textbook & workbook also give much practice.
As the concepts became harder to understand and more complex throughout the semester, so did the lectures. I went to his office hours once to ask for help and he told me that I should know how to do it. Webwork was horrible and usually more difficult than the exams and the exams were pretty fair.
I enjoyed having Professor Thornton for remote Calc 3. His lecture videos were clear. He was very responsive to Piazza, even during break. He genuinely cares about your learning and will make sure you understand the material or make it easier to access (e.g. making a YouTube playlist). I did the WebWork but never used the workbook or textbook.
Thornton sent an email out to students that did poorly on the first exam and in his email he implied that students who did poorly did not put enough effort into this test and even suggested they should switch out of his class. I understand trying to provide options for his students but the way he conveyed it was insensitive and rude :/
Thornton is AMAZING!!!! A little fast-paced, but is great at explaining tough concepts. The exams are pretty easy if you study the practice exams.
Honestly really straightforward expectations. Go to class, practice, show up for the exam and you will do fine. Use all the resources available to you WashU gives plenty.
I'm not even in his class (I have another professor) but I show up to his lectures because he is a very helpful teacher.
An OK lecturer. However, he uses the tough content as an excuse to teach worse. As the content got worse, so did the quality of lectures. WebWork is a HUGE pain however, and recitation is completely useless. Exams don't try to trick you, but ONE mcq is worth 5 points, so there's really no room for error. Do a bunch of practice and you'll be alright
Weekly HW due (usually more than one problem set) that can be unnecessarily hard (way harder than exam questions). Quality of the lecture videos sucks, so going to class is your best bet. Difficulty increases as the semester goes on. Tough material isn't explained as much as it probably should be in lecture, so be prepared to do extra on your own.
I took Calc 3 my first semester of freshman year. I was terrified entering a tough university and taking a known to be a difficult class. I breezed through the first 2/3, but the last third was very difficult. Professor Thornton, however, hosted office hours almost every day and was extremely helpful. He made Calc 3 great! lots of resources, too!
Not a big fan. Lectures were NOT good and as the content got more difficult, he got worse at teaching it. I should've studied more for the tests, but I kinda gave up because the lectures were so awful.
Professor is very nice and helpful. Attend office hours if you need help with Multi Variable calc, he'll make sure you understand it by the time you exit his classroom. I also had a amazing TA during my studies. If you can choose your TA, choose Josh Covey. He's more understanding and will take the time with you to figure out math problems.
Make the exam too hard
Heavy work
Had his class for Calc 3 and it is clear that his teaching quality has dipped in the past years. If you look at previous years he had a high rating and a good reputation among the WashU math department but sadly he has since gotten comically worse. Class is not impossible however he makes many mistakes, is arrogant, and an overall not nice guy.
This guy SUCKS. His teaching is terrible and his tests are cruelly made difficult for NO REASON. Imagine telling students, ON AN EXAM, that the problem (worth 14 points), is going to be nearly IMPOSSIBLE to solve if you don't get the first part right. Yeah he just sucks I don't know what else to say.
Thornton is okay. As materials get harder his lecture becomes worse. Just because students did well during the first exam, he purposely makes exams much harder to keep exam averages down. Homework is useless since non appears on exams. He brags about textbooks he wrote, which have tons of typos. His review sheet and exams are also full of typos.
Thornton is a really nice guy and seems to want you to succeed. However, his lectures are often unclear and his office hours were not helpful; he gives advice such as "yes, this is hard" (no elaboration). But he does make himself available and if you need to take his class it will not be too painful, just amusing and a little frustrating at times.
If you're passionate about learning math, then Thornton is a great professor. He's a hilarious lecturer and explains concepts really well with helpful visuals. However, he tends to make a lot of algebraic mistakes when he's solving problems in class, so make sure you pay attention well enough during lectures so that you can catch his errors.
Thornton is not a good lecturer by any means. They made the exams much harder this sem. The reviews were not very helpful for the exams, especially for the final. Exams are worded in ways that practice problems or past exams can't really prepare you for and he can be super condescending on piazza. Just take calc 3 another semester if possible
Thornton's Calc 3 has been mixed. He tries to listen but fails to explain some concepts. The lectures go through his workbook, a book of problems, that you will have to buy. I think it is the best format for covering so much content and it has good practice problems but the book has so many mistakes. Exams are tough and worth 75% of final.
Do workbook problems, don't sweat the difficulty of webwork (it's not reflective of exams), and go to lecture. If you need help, ask your friends or find another resource that isn't the professor. He sometimes isn't the most pleasant person to ask questions esp if you're a woman, so just something to keep in mind.
Professor Thornton is nice. I had trouble with learning at the beginning of the semester. Then I started to learn and did better on my second exam. I went to his office hours and told him about my passion for business. He then encouraged me "you are born to do business!" What a sweet person!
Thornton's lectures were to-the-point, which I personally like but can be difficult with certain topics. He always went over key problems in class that were on tests, which I appreciated. He also always made sure to scan the room for questions and was fairly accessible outside of class.
Not a nice guy but exams and grading was not too bad.
Prof. Thorton was a very enjoyable professor, and his course was probably my favorite academic course this past semester. While the class is often conceptually challenging, attending office hours regularly (especially from the start) will help you not fall behind. This class can be a lot of fun if you're willing to put in time outside of class.
I do not think Thornton teaches well. He makes fun of you when you ask questions for no reason. He seems to get mad when you correct him. He also makes concepts way more difficult than they are. I honestly would use online videos because they explain better sometimes.
Thornton is an effective professor who explains things pretty well and makes lectures fun. Doesn't have a deeply caring vibe but you'll get everything you need from him, and he is helpful. Effective teacher, fun class, mid guy.
I know that my review doesn't make him or calc 3 seem all that great but he really was a fine professor and the course no more difficult than it should have been. While I do not like all of the grading policies I think that for the most part it was fair.
Great professor. Tests were reasonable & lectures were usually good. Any gaps in understanding could be taken care of by going to his office hours or asking after class.
BUY THE WORKBOOK. Lectures follow it exactly (general theory/conceptual stuff + all practice problems). He explained concepts pretty well, seemed patient enough when asked questions. Exams are quite straightforward and easier than webwork. Honestly Thornton wasn't bad, although have heard/read some not so nice things about how he treats people.
Blake is a nice guy but an ok professor. His lectures are fine, but he uses the workbook as an excuse to skip over conceptual and deep explanations. You will teach yourself a lot in this class. He's not a professor to avoid, but there are certainly better. Take Calc 3 with Schaefer if possible.
Workbook is extremely helpful. I didn't go to many of the lectures but the ones I did go to were informative and pretty easy to understand.
Awful professor. Not the worst lecturer, but clearly incompetent. Gave a final exam which was far too difficult and full of mistakes. Also apparently been weird with students in the past and sometimes gave a hostile vibe in class. Probably shouldn't be teaching, but that goes for most Calc III professors other than Schaefer.
Bad Lectures but not mandatory. His Lectures seemed always to be unable to explain the concepts clearly. Homework is important, try to figure out how to solve the questions on his textbook( also written by him). Webwork is far too difficult compared with his textbook but still counts. Approachable after the class but not very friendly.
Not helpful in lecture. Speeds through things and expects you to know it. The final was nearly impossible this semester (the average doesn't show it but it was) and was full of difficult computations (MUCH different than the review sheet). Wouldn't recommend
Poor lecturer not very approachable. He was condescending and rude on several occasions. The final exam had several mistakes and was designed very poorly. Claimed that the professors went over each problem to see if it was reasonable (don't see how that's possible given the numerous mistakes that were on the final). Disappointing class.
Take this class with another professor if possible, but you won't be utterly screwed if you take this class with Thornton. He's a pretty laid back guy, but all of the studying came from hours and hours of self studying. His lectures didn't help a lot that I just stopped going after a month. The final exam was also a mess with tons of mistakes.
It's a hard class and it's centered around the curriculum he made, so do the workbook problems to study. Not great 1-on-1 and okay in class. My guide for this class is to do the workbook problems they are super helpful.
honestly not bad. lecture is pretty useful bc you fill in solutions in the workbook which is helpful. tests aren't very hard besides the final
Had him for calc3,overall not a hard class but pretty rude guy. Would recommend taking it with a better prof- schaefer usually teaches spring who is a lot better.
Thornton was really enthusiastic during lectures, and while he can go a bit fast, its needed to cover all of the content. I definitely would've fallen asleep in any other calc 3 class.
This was the worst intro to college I've experienced. His lectures were rushed and unhelpful, with no recorded content. The workbook was full of errors, and if you didn't practice from it, you were lost. I had to teach myself everything. This class made me question my passion for a subject I love. Avoid if possible and take it with Schafer.
Prof. Thornton was a enthusiastic lecturer and explained concepts well. He teaches primarily out of a workbook that isn't necessary to get
Tests were not hard if you paid attention in class and did practice problems which there were a lot of. Not the most friendly but good at explaining the concepts needed for exams and did lots of examples in class. Workbook is not totally necessary, but definitely helpful to have. Class was mostly about application not full understanding.
Calc III felt very fair under Professor Thornton. You get out what you put into it. To prepare for the exams, study previous tests found on the WashU exam archive online, and understand that homework can be quite heavy sometimes. Everything is based on the workbook, but he posted it on Canvas (save $). He can be quite harsh in office hours, though.
I'm not sure where some of these reviews stem from, but Professor Thornton was one of the best professors I had at WashU. Yes, he is a little blunt and tough, but he's there to help and cares about your success. Always super friendly during office hours while also being extremely helpful. Calc III made MUCH more sense to me thanks to him.
I don't understand why there are negative reviews of Thornton. He has been exceedingly accommodating and fair in Calc 3 and genuinely seems to care. Class is structured out of a workbook with plenty of practice problems and we are always prepared for exams. Calc 3 is an easy class as long as you show up and put minimal practice in outside of class.
Thornton is a great guy, and his lectures demonstrate how clearly passionate about math he is. He is always willing to help during class, after class, or at office hours. Can be a bit blunt at times, but it never impacts how great of a teacher he is. He also regularly acknowledges that Calc 3 (my class) is challenging, which is refreshing to hear.
Professor Thornton is one of the best teachers I've ever had. His teaching is clear in class, and he is very enthusiastic during office hours. All the exams are of appropriate difficulty, and each includes an extensive review sheet covering everything you need to know.
Blake Thornton thinks it's a good idea to give his students a “challenge,” so he gives ridiculous conceptual questions on every exam and writes each exam harder than last years. Also, he makes you buy HIS textbook to earn extra money. He's not a nice person, although he does know his calculus. Do yourself a favor and take Schaefer instead.
Very knowledgeable professor who truly cares for Calculus. Solid lectures but speaks rather fast for my learning. Grading criteria isnt clear enough in my opinion and the exam difficulty is often extreme. Good person but very blunt in attitude. If you want to do well then give 100% effort and attend office hours (super useful). Best of luck!
Decent professor, but will tank your GPA. Just take Schaefer instead
if u can wait to take this class in the spring with schaefer...do it. thornton wants to make the test harder every year-practice exams are nothing like the actual test. and exams are weighed A LOT. the final was incredibly difficult. he added conceptual stuff that we've never tested over. if u miss one MCQ its like 4 points already. avg on final=76
This class was very difficult (especially the final) and was graded on three midterms and the final. Dr. Thornton was an excellent teacher, and I would not have done as well in this class without his willingness to meet with students and explain things, so I would recommend doing that and listening to the advice he gives.
show up to lecture and you'll be fine! i didn't and still got an a-
For Calc. III Blake Thornton is alright. He says weird stuff sometimes but he's not a bad lecturer. I actually had Moncada (do not recommend) and switched to Thornton and learned much much better. He uses the classic chalkboard and spends adequate time with problems. Alright guy, good professor.
I like his lecture style, as it is mostly comprised of doing problems which suits how I learn, and he taught most material alright. Tests weren't too hard in my opinion, just use the past tests he gives (which I appreciated) to study which I found more helpful than his review sheets. Lectures weren't mandatory but I would highly recommend them
He is a pretty standard lecturer who clearly knows what he is talking about, at least for my class he made the book that you use. He makes jokes that are kind of funny but sometimes fall flat, but at least he tries. I was in a large class and if you asked him to explain something he would take the time to do it right, which I appreciate.
Prof Thornton is a funny guy, but his class is anything but fun. After buying his own required textbook, the class moved very quickly. If you study A LOT, the midterms are fine; however, the final was significantly harder than any of the midterms. There is very little partial credit on exams (mostly MC). He is accessible for limited office hours.
He's actually pretty good and very underrated. Gives fast but good lectures, and gives good practice problems. Two of the midterms has 93ish medians, and the final is alright. Just do all practice problems and it'll be an easy class.
tests were unpredictable and overall class structure was poor
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
7%
Textbook Required
23%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
+0.11 avg changeRatings by Course
MATH127
5.0
(1)MATH128
5.0
(1)A
5.0
(1)MATH2140
5.0
(1)MATH217
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
131
4.0
MATH128
4.0
MATH132
3.9
MATH233
3.5
CALC132
3.5