1.9

Brent James Matheson

Mathematics - University of Waterloo

1.9
Quality
3.5
Difficulty
13%
Would Retake
93
Reviews
1.9
Quality
3.5
Difficulty
1.9
Helpful
1.8
Clarity

13%

Would Retake

93

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

10

4

3

3

12

2

14

1

54

What Students Say

Irresponsible, Disrespectful, and Underqualified

ACTSC371 - 1.0 rating

irresponsible and unprofessional

ACTSC371 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

82%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 21 grades
Most common grades:
A (8)
B (3)
A+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(11)B(5)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(5)
Based on 28 reported grades
A: 8
B: 3
A+: 3
B+: 3
Common Tags
Tough Grader (3)
Get ready to read (1)
Participation matters (1)
Group projects (1)
Tough grader (1)
So many papers (1)
Lecture heavy (1)
Test heavy (1)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.16 avg change
Jan
Nov
Mar
Nov
Dec
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ACTSC221

2.7

(10)

COMM421

2.3

(16)

ACTSC371

1.9

(55)

ACTSCI371

1.5

(2)

ACTS371

1.1

(10)
Difficulty by Course

ACTSCI371

4.0

ACTSC371

3.7

ACTS371

3.6

ACTSC221

3.1

COMM421

3.0

Reviews (93)
5.0
2.0
ACTSC221
Oct 15, 2009

nice guy, helpful...he's the master when it comes to CFA stuff

4.0
1.0
ACTSC221
Nov 3, 2009

I think he is a very helpful prof.If you meet him in person he's pretty reasonable.I took this course in winter 08.His lectures and written examples are effective though his hand writing is terrible.Basically if you do most of the examples at the end of each chapter in the textbook, and attend all the lectures, you can easily get a 90.

5.0
3.0
ACTSC221
Jan 11, 2010

AMAZING. As long as you go to lectures and study for the term tests, the final's a breeze. He's extremely reasonable and adjusts the weighting if you do well on the final. Also, he's really helpful if you go see him during office hours and he sees that you're making an effort.

5.0
2.0
ACTSC221
Dec 11, 2010

Brent is amazing. His explanations are clear, his examples are relevant and sometimes the exact same questions show up on the quizzes and final. The more textbook problems you do, the better. I went in to the final with a 97. The first day of class he said it's disgusting to see people fail this course...he's right, cause it's so easy to get 90's

2.0
1.0
COMM421
Mar 31, 2011

He's a chill prof who's very laid back and easy going, which makes attending lectures alright. But he is lazy as hell. Has provided absolutely no marks for us before the final so we have no idea how we're doing in the course. Also, he references examples from the textbook, but his edition is ancient, one that you can't find.

2.0
4.0
ACTSC371
Apr 3, 2012

He knows the material he's teaching, but that doesn't necessarily make him a good teacher. He does almost no examples in class, no written notes, he comes to class and talks. If you miss anything he says as you're making notes and ask him later to clarify, he helps begrudgingly, constantly reminding you that he mentioned it in class.

2.0
5.0
COMM421
Apr 17, 2012

Very horrible prof. I was so excited about this course and the final was SOOO hard! i studied all term and did not miss a lecture. He cannot explain the material to properly and everything is so vague. Do not take him if you do not have to!

2.0
4.0
ACTSC371
May 3, 2012

Very smart/nice guy, but unfortunately doesn't teach very well. Final was much harder than the midterms, so be sure to ace those and the assignments.

2.0
3.0
COMM421
May 4, 2012

Brent is a nice guy but he should improve his lecture style. A financial analysis class shouldn't be taught like a math course. This course is more subjective and should be taught like a business course (i.e. WLU ones) Students won't absorb the material if it is taught in a mundane way. Tests are fair but lots of material are covered

3.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Jun 30, 2012

Takes awhile to upload things onto D2L and he is only teaching one course... (he reads his ratemyprof comments btw)

2.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Jul 26, 2012

The material was not difficult, but he did not cover it well in class. Students are responsible for knowing the material, so be very responsible in this course.

1.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Jul 26, 2012

Begrudgingly helps students when asked outside of class, always says that he mentioned it in class. Rambles in class and goes off-track and doesn't teach the material well at all. Avoid if possible.

3.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Jul 27, 2012

I was a bit surprised when picking up my midterm. I got 90%+ on it, but saw several horrible grades like 5/37... I think it was really straight forward and there were absolutely no tricks on the midterm. Haven't had the final yet but I know it will be a lot harder, however the midterms were just easy marks..hard material was rushed at the end.

2.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Jul 28, 2012

The material was not difficult to grasp, but always read the textbook and do not rely on his explanations. He repeatedly said he was a good professor, but good teaching does not require an explanation.

3.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Jul 28, 2012

I was disappointed that he thought labeling his midterms as 'fair' could compensate for his poor teaching. High marks in this class (like the student below) were not attributed to his explanations.

4.0
2.0
ACTSC371
Aug 8, 2012

The final exam was fair, if you read the text and do the practice problems at the end of each chapter, then you will be fine. The time for final is tight, as well as midterms, make sure you don't spend too much time on a single problem and practice before exams. I personally think the prof is nice. He improved a lot compare to the last term.

4.0
2.0
ACTSC371
Aug 8, 2012

This is an introductory course to corporate finance, attendance to the lecture is important. Study before the lecture and you will know what the prof is talking about. This wouldn't be a hard course if you want to make effort to it. The prof responses the email and answers the problem in detail and patient. P.s. He smiles sweet!

3.0
2.0
ACTSC371
Aug 9, 2012

very nice prof but unfortunately doesn't teach very well. Brent should put more effort on the board. The finals and midterms are fair.

2.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Sep 20, 2012

Had very long midterms but the final was fair.He marked fairly, but was a terrible lecturer. Loved to talk about his jobs, much to the boredom of the students. Wasn't very helpful. Threatened to press charges of harassment against a guy in my class who went to his office for help repeatedly.

5.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Oct 23, 2012

Absolutely phenomenal prof!He is ALWAYS available for students,responding to emails within minutes from his Blackberry.Lectures are interesting and clear.He discusses life experiences to provide students with knowledge of the industry,not to the boredom of students as someone mentioned.Study your material and you will be fine!Tests are always fair.

5.0
2.0
ACTSC371
Oct 25, 2012

Definitely one of my favourite professors since attending UW! He prepares his students very well for the midterm and makes class interesting. If he teaches any other courses I will be sure to take them! :)

2.0
4.0
ACTSC371
Nov 5, 2012

Fair tests, but not half as engaging as he claims it is. I would actually be more interested if he spent more time explaining basic concepts instead of talking about random things.

2.0
3.0
ACTS371
Nov 25, 2012

DONT take his class! awful prof. he maybe smart, but he is not a prof. He talks about everything but never gives a reasonable explanation. Very boring.

3.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Dec 12, 2012

He claimed to want students to succeed but was very unfriendly when answering emails. He needs to go through more examples of questions on the board instead of having them already solved on slides. His midterms are fairly predictable however he did not give sufficent time for students to complete midterm 1. Wouldnt take another class with him.

3.0
2.0
COMM421
Dec 19, 2012

He is an easy professor relative to the hard course. I barely picked up anything from class. The exams were tough.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Apr 18, 2013

Never take his class

1.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Apr 18, 2013

we did 6 assignments and only got 2 back before the FINAL EXAM. He usually posted assignment solutions really late so we cannot use them to study for midterms. Not helpful at all.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Apr 19, 2013

hes not very nice

1.0
4.0
ACTSC371
Apr 29, 2013

would not take his class again. He shouldn't be a prof

5.0
2.0
ACTSC371
Aug 7, 2013

Great prof! Cares about the students who actually show up to class and want to learn. If you plan to skip classes however, I recommend taking this course with a different prof.

2.0
4.0
ACTSCI371
Aug 28, 2013

The prof is very rude and not helpful most of the time. He likes to be off topic and very unclear on what he is trying to teach

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Aug 28, 2013

really bad prof, one of badest prof I have seen, test is hard this term, and not helpful, not kind, To sum up, bad bad bad bad prof

3.0
3.0
COMM421
Nov 9, 2013

He responds to most emails in a very aggressive and rude manner. I wish he understood what being a teacher is really about. He assumes the worst of all students and has negative preconceptions in his mind. Furthermore, he is very disorganized and has not marked any assignments and gave details for a major project after the term was halfway through.

1.0
4.0
ACTSC371
Nov 11, 2013

Very bad prof. His lectures felt like it was all over the place and he rarely ever wrote things on the board to solve example questions, only went through pre-made slides.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Nov 19, 2013

This prof/Advisor is not helpful at all. He is sooo rude and aggressive while replying students' emails. He doesn't care about students' feeling at all.

5.0
2.0
ACTSC371
Dec 4, 2013

I am not sure why people hate on this guy, but in my opinion he is an awesome prof. He responds emails fast and provides clear answers. He is VERY helpful outside of class, and his lectures are not boring as well. He could be snobby at times, but not frequent. Always attend his class or you will be screwed on tests. However, TAs mark very hard!

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Dec 11, 2013

worst professor ever

5.0
1.0
COMM421
Dec 17, 2013

A bit slow to mark assignments and rude in emails, but in class/in person he is very approachable and fairly polite. His exams have no tricks and are straight from the lecture slides/textbooks.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Feb 4, 2014

This guy just taught random things in class. I think he doesn't want his students to learn anything from him, instead he just wants to show off how smart he is.Maybe he is a prof, but he is not a instructor. Avoid him please.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Feb 4, 2014

One piece of very useful advice for students that are going to take his course: drop it now!!!

1.0
2.0
COMM421
Mar 2, 2014

Worst prof I've ever seen! I don't think he really knows what he want to teach, he just taught a lot random things in class. And he always waste time on mentioning his "great" experience on some random things which is really not helpful for students. He is lazy to finish marking assignments. You probably won't see your assignments marks forever.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Mar 23, 2014

very rude advisor , not helpfull, very rude at e-mails as well. AVOID.

1.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Apr 14, 2014

Arrogant and rude, explanations only confuse people

2.0
2.0
ACTSC371
Apr 25, 2014

The class was not interesting and he didn't help the situation. He expects you to have finance knowledge coming into the course. The package of past assignments and midterms he provided us were super helpful though.

1.0
4.0
ACTSC371
May 4, 2014

His lectures are totally useless. I have totally no clue what he was talking about all the time. I survived by studying the materials from other profs who had taught this course in UW.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
May 14, 2014

Worst professor ever! Don't send email to him. His lecture is really boring and helpless.

5.0
1.0
ACTSC371
Grade: B
May 16, 2014

Excellent prof with tons of knowledge and great speech.He makes the course interesting and helpful with his experience.He is doing a GREAT JOB!

2.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Aug 5, 2014

The WORST penmanship ever. He puts up solutions to past assignments and midterms, but what's the point if you can't make out the writing? His excel examples in class are also sometimes hard to follow.

1.0
2.0
COMM421
Sep 5, 2014

I took both actsc371 & comm421 with him. His lecture is sooooo useless. I got not bad grades for both courses in the end, but literally I learned nothing. He's obviously weak on technical stuff that's why he always tells irrelevant stories. Avoid his lecture as much as possible!!

1.0
4.0
COMM421
Dec 23, 2014

Approachable person but horrible prof. Extremely unclear lectures, goes off tangent and talks about random topics that have nothing to do with course material, and disorganized. Had weekly "pop quizzes" that started in September, not a single one was returned or mark posted for the rest of the course even though he claimed he marked them.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Feb 6, 2015

Worst prof ever.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Feb 11, 2015

Worst Prof ever! Spend all lecture time on useless "interesting" stories. If you want to take his ACTSC371, please be sure you can pass CFA test to pass this course. All thing you need to study must be from textbook but he will never test on that. Bad performance in office hour. Never actually answer the questions. Avoid his class as you can.

1.0
2.0
ACTSC371
Grade: A+
Mar 31, 2015

Irresponsible, Disrespectful, and Underqualified. He never hands back tests or assignments, does a botch job with marking and thinks he is smarter than he really is. Its a shame that he was given an office in M3... an insult to every other prof working there. Shame.

1.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Grade: A
Apr 7, 2015

Lectures are irrelevant and unhelpful to the point that I had to learn the whole course from the textbook and Google. Office hours? Even more unhelpful and meaningless. Bottom line: if you have a class with this prof, it's wise to take it with a different prof.

1.0
4.0
ACTSCI371
Apr 22, 2015

Hey i wonder if anyone from the university's admin office would come here and read the ratingscomments from fellow students. If so, you see all the bad reviews we gave to Brent. Maybe he knows tons of knowledge related to the financial industry but he's not meant to be in school and teach. I have never seen such an irresponsible professor.

1.0
4.0
ACTSC371
Apr 23, 2015

irresponsible and unprofessional

1.0
4.0
ACTSC371
Apr 23, 2015

I think this guy figures we can just use Investopedia so he doesn't teach the important stuff and tells us stories about his daughter in class instead. wtf

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Apr 24, 2015

the course is there for you if you want the following: 1. do not know whats coveredwhats not. 2. prof does not reply to emailreply rudely. 3. get up at 5, like me on the exam day, to cover up the things he claimed to be testable, but never taught in class. 4. listen to stories of his wife, daughter. 5. you name it.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Apr 27, 2015

Brent has ALOT of external commitments, so he won't have time to have office hours, tutorials, or even lectures. The textbook for this course is his biography because all he talks about is his life stories in class. Hes extremely qualified to be everything but an actsc professor, so before you click enroll make sure your prof isnt BJM.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
May 14, 2015

Worst Prof ever! DO NOT TAKE HIS CLASS! he has no respect for students, he's lecturers are so boring. He goes on and on about his family and skip the important part of the lecture. He gets mad at you for making him repeat the important points, he calls you names, and he is the worst advisor too. He also has no respect for his fellow advisors!

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
May 15, 2015

BM rarely teaches. Lectures include BM getting upset at students, reading off slides and telling to stories of his past co-ops, job positions and his daughter. With regards to marking, assignments will never be on time and in some cases - lost. If you've taken ECON 101, consider ACTSC 371 with BM a harder equivalent - just read the text and slides.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
May 21, 2015

1010 best story telling class ever. We learned so much about his daughter and how bankers were not at fault for the crash of 2008. His stolen lecture slides were kind of meh but he made up for it in personality. Youll sure to be more confused than a jamaican guy in china town after attending his lectures. Hes not BM hes GM (good manners)

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Grade: Incomplete
Aug 6, 2015

I heard stories about this guy and for real he needs to grow up

1.0
3.0
ACTSC371
Aug 12, 2015

Worst prof ever! Never answers students question and not clear on what material is covered and what is not.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Grade: A
Sep 10, 2015

His ability to teach makes me want to cry. This guy makes me worried about this world as a whole. What a detriment to UW....

1.0
2.0
ACTSC371
Grade: B+
Sep 23, 2015

By far the worst professor in UW. Whenever i went to brents

1.0
4.0
ACTSC371
Grade: A
Oct 15, 2015

worst proff ever - very rude in his email and not a knowledgeable guy.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Nov 27, 2015

Just a very rude person. And, only give out important administrative information in lectures so students would have to go to his classes listening to him bragging about his past experiences.

3.0
1.0
ACTSC371
Jan 3, 2016

90 in this class Read textbook/investopedia/LISTEN as he will test on verbally communicated info. Tests are copied STRAIGHT FROM EXCELS. his style of teaching is NOT COPY NOTES, READ NOTES, DO WELL. he goes off on tangents and he's trying to share a perspective on REAL issues he is always willing to help during office hours

1.0
2.0
ACTS371
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2016

Prepare for the teaching experience beyond your imagination. No help, no care of for student, mark exams for 2 months, sometimes skip tutorial he himself held up. Only good side is that he makes easy exam since he doesnt care.

1.0
5.0
ACTS371
Grade: B+
Mar 30, 2016

Terrible.

1.0
4.0
ACTS371
Grade: A-
Apr 1, 2016

Does not care about students, merely replies email Class materials are irrelevant, Do not take his class. Highly not recommended.

1.0
3.0
ACTS371
Grade: B+
Apr 1, 2016

Seldom replies to posts on Piazza, does not help students to learn, TERRIBLE.

2.0
4.0
ACTSC371
Grade: A-
Apr 2, 2016

Consider not taking his class if you have alternatives.

1.0
5.0
ACTSC371
Grade: B-
Apr 3, 2016

Horrible...

1.0
4.0
ACTS371
Grade: A
Apr 3, 2016

Tests materials does not reflect textbook contents and lecture slides, irresponsible.

1.0
5.0
ACTS371
Grade: B-
Apr 8, 2016

His lecture is a joke.....

3.0
2.0
COMM421
Apr 22, 2016

- Comm 421's group project was the best thing that i did in UW. - Brent voluntarily shares invaluable real life experiences that you would appreciate if the course content is not your only concern. - Brent is a good prof in the wrong school - much suited in Laurier or any B-School. - He is the only CFA charter holder in UW.

1.0
2.0
ACTSC221
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 10, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Please avoid at all cost, very rude and careless prof. You should be better off by just reading the textbook and doing textbook examples

Tough Grader
1.0
4.0
ACTSC221
Grade: Audit/No Grade
Dec 7, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Worst GUY ever

Tough Grader
1.0
4.0
ACTSC221
Dec 18, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Actually the reason I chose this course is I want to improve my GPA. However, Brent made me feel disappointed on actual science. He never post on learn the exam info. No assignments solution post on learn. Our 3rd midterm failed almost half class. He never curve. He should also find some reasons on himself compare to 231 Prof this term.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
5.0
2.0
COMM421
Grade: A+
Mar 27, 2018
Would take again

- Great prof, very accommodating to the class in terms of quiz and project scheduling - Easy quizzes as long as you go to class and listen

1.0
5.0
ACTSC221
Jul 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

worst prof in ACTSC

1.0
5.0
ACTSC221
Oct 17, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Literally Worst

3.0
2.0
COMM421
Grade: A+
Apr 4, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Brent likes to give life examples to illustrate, but I got lost in his examples sometimes and cannot get back to lecture.

Participation matters
Group projects
1.0
3.0
ACTS371
Grade: A
Nov 12, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Literally the worst...

1.0
2.0
ACTS371
Grade: A
Nov 15, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Just bad....

1.0
5.0
ACTS371
Grade: A
Jan 10, 2020
Wouldn't take again

absolutely horrible avoid at all cost

Tough grader
3.0
3.0
ACTSC221
Grade: Rather not say
Nov 20, 2022
Would take again

Prof Matheson is engaging; I don't think he's that bad of a prof. The issue is, you MUST attend lectures in order to keep up with the content, because he doesn't upload many examples to the course site (mainly just practice questions). He's nicer in person; he seems blunt and not understanding online. He's nicer when you ask questions irl.

1.0
5.0
COMM421
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 19, 2024

Tests are extremely random and are off the slides. All important points are delivered ONLY orally in class and CANNOT be found on slides so if you got sick or drifted off for a few seconds then good luck because there is absolutely no place to catch up. Slides are not helpful and not related to tests so could still get 0 even if memorized them all.

1.0
5.0
COMM421
Grade: B
Nov 30, 2024

He is so rude when I asked for support and guidance during quizzes and exam. I feel so dismissed and unsupported!

So many papers
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
COMM421
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 11, 2024

All the things that were tested were delivered orally in class, and the slides that he provided were actually useless. However, an interesting thing is that his lecture is actually horrible. Instead of clearly interpreting the concepts, he likes to talk about his personal stories. So you will always get lost during the lecture time.

3.0
4.0
COMM421
Grade: B
Mar 1, 2025

Brent's COMM421 class is a mixed bag - the lectures can be disjointed, but his real-world examples make it worthwhile. The tests are tough if you miss class. unstuck ai and the free textbook help fill the gaps.

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

82%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 21 grades
Most common grades:
A (8)
B (3)
A+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(11)B(5)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(5)
Based on 28 reported grades
A: 8
B: 3
A+: 3
B+: 3
Common Tags
Tough Grader (3)
Get ready to read (1)
Participation matters (1)
Group projects (1)
Tough grader (1)
So many papers (1)
Lecture heavy (1)
Test heavy (1)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.16 avg change
Jan
Nov
Mar
Nov
Dec
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ACTSC221

2.7

(10)

COMM421

2.3

(16)

ACTSC371

1.9

(55)

ACTSCI371

1.5

(2)

ACTS371

1.1

(10)
Difficulty by Course

ACTSCI371

4.0

ACTSC371

3.7

ACTS371

3.6

ACTSC221

3.1

COMM421

3.0

Similar Professors