2.7
Quality3.7
Difficulty42%
Would Retake109
Reviews42%
Would Retake
109
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
18
4
23
3
12
2
17
1
39
What Students Say
“Textbooks are available through the Mason library”
STAT362 - 5.0 rating“If you r are not a good test taker do not take the class”
STAT250 - 1.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
57%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.38 avg changeRatings by Course
STAT362
4.1
(18)STAT334
3.0
(1)STAT250
2.5
(55)STAT344
2.4
(15)STAT350
2.2
(13)Difficulty by Course
STATS244
5.0
STAT205
4.5
STAT455
4.5
STAT350
4.1
STATS250
4.0
Reviews (109)
All he does is repeat exactly what is in the book. He does not teach very well or give reviews for tests. Everything is book based (what's worse is that the book does not help at all). He curves exams.
It seems like Prof Hunter is really new to teaching. I got an F on the first exam (most of the class did and he curved it) and then an A on the second one. I think he is still trying to figure out his teaching style, how to write tests, etc. Save yourself some unneeded anxiety and find someone else who already knows how to teach the material.
STAT 250 with him wasn't all that bad. It's a pretty average amount of work, maybe 90 minutes a week. My biggest beef with this class was that he makes you learn about a program that you can't use on the exams and really doesn't matter.
he doesn't care, he doesn't teach the material very well. he doesn't know how to help students understand the core concept of stat. The exams weren't that bad, but since he didn't teach the material I barely passed the tests. You could possibly pass his class but if stat is core to your major don't take him at all YOU won't learn a thing.
Brett is not a good teacher. He spends more time writing his notes on a piece of paper and project it on the wall then explaining how to use the learned concepts. His exams are open note, open internet. But don't be fooled, I studied and used all resources and still failed his class. And so did half the people in the class. I had A+, A, A- and a D.
I usually get As. New teacher cannot teach, terrible. I dropped the class because he does not teach or knows how. Don't do it. He should be fired.
Extremely harsh when grading. If your paper isn't near picture perfect don't expect a good grade. Focuses most lectures on learning a program instead of learning the material. This makes it difficult to take tests and quizzes and pass them. Attendance is not negotiable you have to show up in order to earn credit. Do not take him, he is not helpful.
Lectures are consists of him reading off powerpoints, and doing the practice problems. Makes you use a program which calculates formulas for you on homework, and projects. But, he does not allow you to use the program during tests. That means you get no practice doing problems by hand. Class test scores average, 60-70% range.
If you come to STAT 344 with no background of statistics, AVOID AT ALL COST. As the semester progresses, his online notes begin to turn into small summaries that are not useful when studying. The textbook in general is not helpful, and the homework given is very tedious. Just take it in the summer honestly...I know I probably will have to.
Brett wasn't a very good professor. His tests were really challenging, and his grading is harsh. He gave no partial credit on the final exam, and for that, I have to retake the class. He is also very rude when you ask questions because he assumes you should already know the answer. 10/10 would not recommend taking stats with him if you can avoid it
Some backgrnd in stat but this class most things were new to me. 6 hw w graded,ungraded parts which help ur grade. exams open calc,notes reflect examples he does in class. GO TO CLASS to understand them and STUDY,write notes to ur understanding. Little lenient on grading, gives curves and partial credit. Final was hw probs n his examples.
He does take the time to explain concepts well. His notes are easy to study off of, and you have to look through his example problems when studying for exams. They are mostly similar. Exams are open notes open book so I don't see what the fuss is about. Stats is not an easy subject so don't expect an easy A.
Professor Hunter's online class was well organized and his notes were clear. 30% of your grade is based on homework, which is fairly easy after completing the lab assignments (based on completion). There is a discussion board that is used to ask questions (also part of participation grade). Textbooks are available through the Mason library.
This is truly one of the worst professors I've had. I've attended all but two lectures and he speaks right off the power point and if you are confused most of the time he makes it worse and you don't understand what he's even saying. We use a program in class and on homework and quizzes but on exams we don't have the program.
Dr. Hunter isn't that bad of a guy, but the way he taught the class would not fit my style of learning. He just read from the slides and continually asked if we have questions over and over again. The semester was comprised of a couple of quizzes and data analysis assignments, as well as 2 exams and a final. Not too hard as long as you try.
I thought he was a fantastic teacher. He writes notes live in class and does a lot of examples. Concepts are introduced well and there is a very natural progression of material. Do the homework and study examples for the exams, which are open note. Go to the lecture, do the work, and you will do well.
Dr. Hunter is a professor who knows so much about the topic for his own good. Teaching such a basic class seems under stimulating to him. He answers questions well and will help you understand on a basic level, but most of my learning came from figuring it all out on quizzes.
He is by far one of the worst teachers/professors I have ever had the displeasure of knowing. He reads straight off the powerpoints created by Pearson, and also forces us to use Pearson's statistics software on quizzes/homework/and basically everything; however, for exams we cannot use it. Avoid taking this class with him, trust me.
He seems like a very nice guy but his way of teaching just didn't work for me. He reads straight off the powerpoints, and we spend a lot of time learning how to use a system that we can't use for tests. He isn't particularly engaging and the class itself is very dull. Statistics is not a fun subject. Brett somehow makes it even worse.
Kind nice at first, but didn't teach very well. Completely reads off the slides, but attendance is actually a grade via Blackboard. You NEED to ask questions or go to office hours if you're confused about something (I didn't). Actually do the practice problems before quizzes and tests, and you should do fine. btw you don't need the textbook.
Although Prof. Hunter seems like a nice person but he wasn't really helpful. Lectures are bad. You pretty much have to teach yourself in order for you to know the material. Practice quizzes are helpful prior to taking the actual chapter quiz. Data Analysis are confusing but feasible. In the end, you are on your own with this professor.
Brett Hunter was an average professor. Don't let the rest of the ratings scare you unless you are not good at math. Most of the concepts were easy. He does tend to read the slides and keeps asking if anyone has questions. Also, he seems nice when lecturing but he doesn't seem like he cares all that much about the students. Overall, he's okay.
He's a nice enough person and he tries to engage with students as much as possible, but he's not too great at explaining the material. If you've already taken a statistics class and need a revision, he may be a better teacher for you. If not, I recommend taking this course with another professor. Be cautious of the final and last data analysis.
Brett was one of my favorite professors last semester. He explained everything clearly and answer any question to the best of his ability. While attendance isn't mandatory, you will lose points if you don't show and if he sees ANYONE leave right after sign-in, he will do it again so you still lose points.
He's a professor that teaches by reading slides. As long as I paid attention during lectures, everything made sense. He has a lot of examples in the lectures, which also helps a lot since STAT 250 is heavy on application. He replies really fast through email. He takes attendance so go to class.
I don't know why this professor has a bad rating. Honestly, as long as you do the homework and show up to the class and should be able to get a Bes
He's a very good professor in that he provides handwritten notes and solved examples for you on blackboard. So attending his semi-monotone lectures in which attendance is not required is not necessary. The tests are a bit hard, but by studying his examples and homework you can easily get a high A. Summer class was 40% homework - 60% exams
Do not recommend, as many times as I reached out for help especially towards the end he basically said sorry. cant help ya. I really struggle with math all he does is lecture with slides and doesn't use many examples and the quizzes were very hard and always due on Fridays. If you r are not a good test taker do not take the class.
Professor Hunter is a great professor. I'm honestly shocked by the low rating he has on here. He teaches the material well and is very knowledgeable on the subject. Good powerpoints. He answers questions in the middle of class, and he emails back very quickly. He takes attendance, but only because every teacher in the STAT department does.
Dr. Hunter is a good person and clearly cares a lot about statistics, but this class is an absolute nightmare unless you have extreme confidence in your math skills. Receiving a D in this class was particularly annoying for me since I went to almost every TA and office hours session. The Data Analysis assignments in particular are horrible.
You can tell that he wants his students to learn, but he doesn't teach in an effective way. He teaches fast, and only uses explanations that are provided by slides from Pearson. He doesn't try to break down concepts in ways that are easier to understand, and expects students to grasp concepts quickly. Wouldn't recommend this professor.
Brett is a way better professor than some people give him credit for. Stats starts easy but gets a little complicated, but he always makes sure that everyone understands and never goes too far ahead until everyone does. He is easily accessible and always willing to help. His lectures are easy to follow, and there's no surprises on quizzes/exams.
Its your basic math class with a basic teacher. Nothing really special about the way he teaches, but nothing negative either.
One of the rude professor in GMU. This is my first time i am experiencing this type of prof in my education life. Always reply the email with ego and rude. Even if you provide the details answer in lab or homework, always cut points in small stupid things. This is not that hard class. Never going to take any class with this man AGAIN!!!!
Avoid him if you have option. Do not recommend him as a professor. Act like a childdish. I don't know how he get chance to teach in university. Do not have experience in dealing with student.
Surprised at the bad reviews. I never had a problem with Hunter. His blackboard is amazingly well organized and he always got back to me promptly. Sure, he doesn't always give you straightforward answers, but he was never rude to me. I learned a lot and for an online class, I thought it was great. I will say he doesn't give great feedback though
Not a good professor. Very bad attitude when it comes to asking him questions, he expects you to know the material already. Dont answer Data Analysis questions, and the grading is done by teacher assistants. Tests are hard and are weighted heavily, dont take him if possible.
Very rude and condescending during office hours. Mandatory attendance. Makes tests difficult and doesn't offer much feedback. TA's grade everything and minimal feedback is given. Do not take this professor unless you like boring lectures with mandatory attendance. This is an easy class but tests are heavily weighted and it destroys overall grade.
I don't know why he has so many bad reviews. He reads off slides & can be boring, but the material is simple (or perhaps it's because I took up to calculus in HS). He goes over many examples & answers questions well. The data analysis assignments can be tedious and long, but they're fine. I never went to the TAs or his office hours and I got an A.
I struggled in this class. I'm decent with math, but he doesn't explain well enough for people with no previous experience. I tried TA's for tutoring, but they were no help. I went to his office hours, and he was very helpful and respectful to me. This is just a course you have to teach yourself if you get a bad professor. Or, just quizlet ;).
He is a good professor who has a clear guidelines for assignment and lab for every week. The only bad review I see here are from those who got like C or C-. Work hard and you shall get good grades.
He gives two parts of HW graded problems and book problems. Book problems are for completeness and graded problems are to see if you know the material. Only bad thing is his final is cumulative and other professors are not so it's a lot of material to know. His exams are open notes so take advantage of that and know what you are looking for.
Hunter is a relaxed and competent professor. He conveys content in a clear and well-organized manner. His tests are open note and not overly difficult. There are homework assignments every-other week, two midterms, and a final.
I thought Professor Hunter was a decent professor. This class is very much a programming course with an expectation that you will already have some stats knowledge. I recommend taking STAT 350 concurrently or beforehand because the material he provides is just not enough to learn some of the harder statistics in time for the final.
I know why you are here. Just like me 6 months before Whatever class he teaches are designed for a review. He teaches numerous concepts in one hour and gives you no feedback. Lectures are so boring and reading from the slides. Students fall asleep during his stupid lectures. I highly recommend not taking class with him. I give a zero.
He's a nice guy and all but as a teacher that doesnt mean anything. Hes boring to listen to and no one mentions his squeaky voice. powerpoints are 90 slides min! and thats only 1 class of 2p week MyStatLab is as awful as any other pearson program too bad you cant escape that but you CAN escape this prof. Hes a good guy but that didnt help my grade.
Nice guy but not so much of a good teacher, hard class overall and his way of teaching doesn't help. If you take his class you will be learning the material on your own. Exams are very confusing and the final is cumulative .
Hunter's teaching is fine its just that the material's hard and confusing. If you come to class and do the homework(that's not graded btw) you will pass. Have to put in work and learn some vocab so it all makes sense. Are study guides and a review session before exams but MUST bring own questions. Definitely the better of the STAT 250 profs
His teaching is fine, the course just isn't designed great since it focuses a lot on statcrunch which you can't use on the exams. Attendance counts for your grade so make sure you go to class. Do the practice problems on mystatlab to prepare for the tests and quizzes and learn how to do things by hand. He definitely thought we were all stupid tho.
Dr. Hunter has a difficult job. STAT 250 is required for majors that don't particularly love stats, much less math. There are difficult assignments but help with learning material. Taking PSY Stats really helped prep me for this course. I am in my 30's, never took Algebra, (I'm from FL) but Dr. H a good prof so don't blame him if you fail.
I hated this class but im also bad at math. its also boring as dirt
He is a very good teacher. If you put an honest effort in, you will be able to get at least a B. I only had a B+ because I missed one of the quizzes. He will answer any question you have.
Instructor Hunter has to be evaluated for his unethical and unprofessional behavior with students. He never help you to understand the concept. He is a stupid professor I have ever met in my whole academic tuner.
Prof. Hunter has a good sense of humor and is relaxed. Participation is 7%, (attendance + participation in in-class assignments). If you show up, this class is an easy A. The material isn't difficult; the hardest part is probably learning StatCrunch. Exams are easy (Scantron). For anyone pursuing this, he's also the Data Analysis Minor Advisor.
I feel he is so underrated. Those who hate him so much are just lazy and privileged. This is college and this is stat, so you gotta put in the work. Everything is open notes so what can you as for? He also responds to post on the board punctually. I got an A but it needed extra effort. Take him if you wanna learn how to program using SAS or R.
The class in itself wasnt too difficult - Im not the best at math anyway and was fairly new to data analysis softwares, which I thought was okay because it was an intro class. I went to his office hours for extra help and he essentially ignored me, despite me being the only person there. It was just really strange, and definitely not helpful.
Literally an awful professor, he reads directly off the slides, doesn't even try to further explain it. Whenever someone asks a question he acts like its such a hassle to answer it and belittles you for asking. I did so well in every class other than stats. The contents is also awful, we learn like a bunch of new distinct new topics EVERY CLASS.
He is honestly a nice guy who wants you too learn. He is accessible outside of class and is pretty understanding of student's situations. The worst thing about this course is the way that it's set up, which I don't think is Hunter's fault. In this class, you are learning new material before you even get tested on your past material.
I took this class as a freshman instead of taking math 106 and that was a horrible decision on my part. I thought it would be similar to AP Stats but I was wrong. The prof. is kinda awkward. He mainly reads off slides but tries to act like he doesnt. He's nice but is very boring like I would literally be falling asleep class.
Average teacher, not too good or too bad. He does post all the notes which is nice. Lectures are kinda boring though. It is a more difficult class, but he has open note exams.
Prof. Hunter was not the best. Went over new topics every class. Hard to keep up since we never did reviews. Homework is not mandatory but it helps. Chapter quizzes are easy, exams are all mult. choice. He records you while you take them though.. Has an intimidating presence. He is serious about attendance. It was easier taking the course online!
Very tough professor. Long lecture videos that are boring and confusing. He does not tell/show you what grade you have at all during the semester, it'll be a surprise at the end. Does not seem to care at all about his students. He shows no sympathy at all. Don't take his class, you'll probably regret it. He also takes a while to respond to emails.
Seem like all he cares about is the course and not even his students. He doesn't care about students at all. The far worst absolute terrible professor who over complicates material. Take someone else. And run away from this professor.
He doesn't care about his students. I started an exam late at night and I finished 10 min after midnight the day it was due; instead of just letting it go he said he would change the ones I got right after midnight to wrong. I got a 100 on the only other exam we'd done at the time, so don't assume he'll be forgiving even if you try in his class.
Prof. Hunter is solid choice, though his lecture can be dull at time. Attendance is not mandatory, he post all notes online, half of the homework grade on completion, 3 exams open note/book, drop 3 lowest quiz, curve and partial credit. STAT is tough, gotta put in effort. Study the example he does in class and homework, you will do fine.
Very condescending tone both in person, over email, and in grading notes. The type of professor to be offended when you don't understand him 100%, he would also get more emotional than other professors and be visibly frustrated when a student leaves 5 minutes early. I would strongly recommend taking another professor if you can.
Condescending elitist on a power trip. Good luck learning from a man who lacks empathy and gets off on belittling his students.
Definitely avoid this professor if possible. He refuses to help students understand the coursework. Instead the professor just brings up that people use online tools to cheat and assumes anytime you ask for help you are just trying to get answers. I learned way more researching online than I did from his lectures due to the lack of feedback
He is not a good professor he is extremely strict and doesn't care about his students at all. For his sum class he assigns an exam the same week another chapter for an DA assignment is due. His DA assignments are 40 questions or more, his study guides don't help at all in the exams. He doesn't tell you your grade. He is the worst professor I took.
I do feel that Brett is very nitpicky. He doesn't explain things super well sometimes and can be condescending through email because he feels like he can. I had him for a summer class, which is challenging. Stay on top of the material. Like all maths, the new content builds upon the previous content, and Brett won't give you any sort of break.
This was byfar the worst class have ever taken at gmu. The professor used lectures that were over 3 years old and was very rude to me when I asked questions over email. The lectures were also nothing like the tests nor the quizzes. The DA assignments were a big part of the grades, but he never clarified what he wants written in the lectures..
Prof Hunter was middle of the road- his stylyle is very independent so if you need more professor-student interaction, not your guy. He had office hours but TAs were the real gems. Go to them if you can and ask them every question imaginable. Exams were ok, quizzes were hard and DAs could be really picky
Professor Hunter, a fantastic professor, made the subjects so easy by giving detailed information. He responds to email and answers any question you ask briefly above all he doesn't Deceive his students as Dr. Strazzeri does. Take Hunter Stay away from Dr. Strarzerri; he is the opposite of hunter. Do My stat lab Homework. It helps a lot.
This class was well-organized but somewhat challenging- if you are a student thats really good about doing things ahead of/on time, youll be fine. Its pretty straight forward and notes are clear. Office hours help so go to them as much as you can. Not recommended if don't have the time to dedicate to the material
This is the worst professor I have ever taken. Do not take this class in summer. You have a test basically every week on top of like 2 quizzes and a long 40 question Data Analysis. I didn't understand how to solve a few questions, went to learn from Khan Academy, and ended up with an Honor Code Violation for not using the formula and words he used.
This was an online summer class so it was a lot of difficult material to learn in 8 weeks. Professor Hunter posted power points which he read aloud. I thought he did a good job explaining the concepts.. Very demanding workload with constant homework, 10 quizzes, 4 data analysis assignments and 4 exams. Still, I would take him again.
Contrary to popular reviews, he's not bad. SOLID choice. I really liked his class. He explained the powerpoints thoroughly. Lots of practice problems that help A LOT in this class. Make a friend so it's not overwhelming. The DA's are doable. Review sessions for exams (ask ur q's pls!). I took him spring semester. I suggest taking STAT in person.
Take it with someone else
Do not take Stat344 with this professor. I added at the start of week 2 with hw already having been due, he did not give me additional time to complete the assignment, and when I tried to submit the work as soon as I found out he still gave no credit. This was before my second class with him. This dropped my overall grade 2.5%. Really unacceptable.
I was nervous taking him because the reviews were a bit mixed. The only reason I think it is mixed is because the material was a bit difficult, but zero complaints with him as an instructor. Very polite about questions. Everything was extremely straightforward. He was even understanding about a short extension I requested. Ended up enjoying it!
Take professor Hunter for STAT 362 he is very nice and his lectures are straight-forward. I am a statistics major and I have already taken CDS 101 and 102 ( as my science + natural lab) so understanding R was very easy for me since I had experience. I had also already taken CS 112. If you have coding experience this will be an easy class.
I was so afraid to take STAT 250 because of all of the horror stories that I heard. Taking this class with Hunter was very straight forward. There are 4 exams (including the final), 4 Data Analysis Assignments, and lots of homework and quizzes. Just do the Data Analysis Assignments early, study for the exams and you'll be fine.
Tough to understand lectures, but can get a good grade if you work hard.
Prof read off the slides. Lots of weekly HW (online problems, quizzes) through MyStatLab. DA and tests are very doable and not hard as long as you do the HW early & on-time. I'm decent at math and never joined his office hours, got B+ but I wish it could be an A lol. This class is very useful for science/health majors as well, tho it's not required
I had him online and I would say hard pass. He posts weekly lectures, with a large amount of hw each week. His explanations arent that easy to understand, and a lot of times he says you wont have to know how to do something by hand but then for the tests you do. With a lot of work you can pass, but I would say skip for sure.
recommend taking his in-person class. He is willing to help on the assignment and we can work on them during class. HW and Labs can seem to be long but they are helpful to learn. Exams open note so you can use hw and labs codes (big help tbh).
Took Professor Hunter last semester. Had done labs and homeworks which were helpful in one getting to know R or SAS. He is a very nice guy who always reply back on BB and emails. However, he is scary in person! Overall, he is a good professor!
Boring lectures. Not too many hw assignments but that also means your MOE for the final exam (which is worth 30%) decreases severely if you don't do well on those assignments. His final exam felt almost impossible considering how all of the in-class exercises were done using R but we were asked to solve those problems by hand on the final.
exams and homework are harder than the in class examples. if you skip class you absolutely will not pass. his lecture notes are not enough to grasp the content. do the examples go to office hours and put in the effort. his class is tough and he's a harsh grader.
This class can be intimidating and Dr Hunter can come off as uncaring - he's not he's just busy and stressed. The class is not easy to learn or teach. Show up, ask questions, get help from the professor, read the slides and watch the lecture videos. Google is your friend, and yes this class is frustrating, but push through it! Worth taking for sure
100% on Labs if you try, HW is doable as long as you really understand R or SAS examples from lectures. Mid/Final timed at 75 min for each part (Same type of questions as HW). If you do extra credit at end, replace lowest Lab and/or HW grade. Study hard, very very useful class for data science, business intelligence type jobs.
You go over R and SAS. The weekly modules are broken up in a clear way, and each have a lab (completion grade), a HW (graded for accuracy), an easy quiz about the material, and a discussion post. The midterm and finals were not too hard as they were open note and like HWs, however you should study before hand as you will quickly run out of time.
Prof Hunter was an interesting professor. He cared about those who cared about the class. A mutual respect kind of deal. I think you get what you give in this class and those who got bad grades did not put in enough effort.
Professor Hunter used the flipped classroom method very well. He was ready to help in class and has very clear lectures that complement the reading. The material is difficult, especially if you don't have any scripting background. But a basic knowledge of stats and like one coding tutorial in any language would set you up for success.
Professor Hunter is nice, but as a teacher falls short in efficiency. His charming appearance & demeanor come with two significant drawbacks: typos and his delivery that resembles a robotic script, akin to the Terminator's high-pitched voice. I found myself spending hours listening without truly comprehending the material.
Made the subject more difficult than it should be. Class average for first exam was a failing grade and continued to make the other two exams even more difficult. Is very picky with free response answers and is always looking for a specific answer. Take this class to destroy your gpa.
DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS! I just took this class and failed, he is a very tough grader and overall a difficult professor. STAT 250 is a difficult class, however, with this professor, it is 20x harder.
It was just a terrible class overall. You can apply yourself for hours and still not understand anything, and his notes were truly no help. You're better off reading the textbooks than watching his slides and lectures.
Do NOT take his class unless you want to ruin your GPA and waste your money! He blows through concepts so fast and acts as if you should already know everything before he teaches them. All of the assignments are hard and will require hours to work on them each day and you'll STILL be completely confused! Please save yourself the trouble.
Brett is a fantastic teacher. I applaud him for always acknowledging his mistakes when he makes them and informing students right away. The material is hard, but very doable if you study and work hard. Such an amazing, down to Earth teacher, but also a bit strict, which makes me work even harder. Be aware of group assignments due every week!
Tests weigh a lot, but they are open notes. He is a nice person and will help out with problems. You will need to look over the slideshow notes/videos to work through problems (he go by it fast). Make excellent notes (he can be very specific), and you'll do fine.
Professor Hunter runs a well-structured class. The workload is manageable if you engage with the material and utilize helpful resources like unstuck AI. His lectures and feedback complement the textbook nicely. With effort, this challenging yet rewarding course can lead to great learning outcomes.
He claims to run a flipped classroom, but has no detailed materials we can use outside of class to learn. When teaching he never writes his answers full out, but expects you to know how to do it for the tests. For most of the tests I did the math right but lost many points on this. He was unclear with his expectations and they were always changing.
He runs a very hard class. If you don't take the time to study over and over, you will not pass. That being said, he was very responsive to emails and was fair and accommodating when I had issues with my group members.
will ask you to write code whilst you probably have no idea what to do, expect you to know how to do a statistics problem, whose formula was written in a obscure place in his canvas rather than his actual slides. slides are way to long and his grading is way to tough and never specified what to do for each problem for his tests. DO NOT TAKE ONLINE
This professor made the class very difficult. His lectures were hard to follow, the videos weren't very helpful, and he moved through examples too quickly. Many students struggled on the exams, but as a person, he wasn't bad.
It wasnt that bad having known a bit of R. Doesnt teach in class but the lecture videos were helpful and only took me like 2 hours per unit. Software assignments were good prep for exams(open note-decently hard). Would def recommend the 70$ wileyplus grading option. Yeah its more work but is basically free points. Overall, hes a chill prof to have.
RUNNN!!! literally the worst professor you will ever meet. Extremely rude and disrespectful and does NOT care at all about his students like a normal professor should. I had the worst experience ever and was never disrespected like that by a professor. He will not even try to help you and will disregard all your efforts. PLEASE avoid at all times.
This professor is very strict and runs a flipped classroom that makes the course harder than necessary. Exams were extremely difficult despite being open-note, and class averages were poor. He doesn't curve grades and seems indifferent to pass/fail outcomes. My advice: don't miss any assignments, because exams will go much worse than expected.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
57%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.38 avg changeRatings by Course
STAT362
4.1
(18)STAT334
3.0
(1)STAT250
2.5
(55)STAT344
2.4
(15)STAT350
2.2
(13)Difficulty by Course
STATS244
5.0
STAT205
4.5
STAT455
4.5
STAT350
4.1
STATS250
4.0