2.9

Carol Oyster

Psychology - University of Wisconsin - La Crosse

2.9
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
90
Reviews
2.9
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
2.6
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

90

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

22

4

21

3

9

2

26

1

12

What Students Say

Thinks she's super awesome

PSY321 - 2.0 rating

Acts like she's to busy to help students at all, hard to reach, forgets to do things

PSY205 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
A (2)
C (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(3)B(0)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 4 reported grades
A: 2
C: 1
A+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.07 avg change
May
Nov
Dec
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHM105

5.0

(1)

SOCPSY

5.0

(1)

GROUPDYNAMICS

5.0

(1)

PSYALL

5.0

(1)

PSY247

5.0

(1)
+21 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PSYCH341

5.0

SOCPSY

4.0

PSY341305

4.0

ALLPSY

4.0

PSY342

4.0

Reviews (90)
4.0
3.0
PSY
Mar 1, 2003

No Comments

4.0
3.0
PSY341
Mar 11, 2003

learned a lot, but tests were hard-had contradiciting info from book and notes.

5.0
2.0
CHM105
Mar 13, 2003

Good guy, lectures mostly, funny. Enjoyable class

4.0
1.0
PSY341
Oct 23, 2003

Good lecturer, but very unorganized, always right, and bad at making tests (she has the students maket he tests in social psych yuck!!)

5.0
3.0
PSY341
Nov 6, 2003

The more I have class with her, the more I like her. She is easy and entertaining to listen to and obviously enjoys what she does. Tests can be difficult if you don't study. Overall one of the better psych professors here.

1.0
3.0
PSY305
Dec 8, 2003

by far the absolute worst professor i've had in 4.5 years of college. lecture and book material contradicts, doesn't go over exams even when the class average is a 76%! isn't up to date on lots of material, very disorganized, very difficult meet with

5.0
3.0
PSY341
Apr 8, 2004

Very thorough. Lectures are interesting and engaging. Tests are tough but not impossible. She is very good about making sure everyone understands. I have learned a lot and use the information to help me with other classes. Definately worth taking.

1.0
3.0
PSY341
Apr 13, 2004

Good lectures, contradicts her reading assignments, looses things and doesn't really care about the students, more wrapped up in her own personal issues than teaching, just teaching to make a living, not because she cares.

2.0
3.0
PSY341
Apr 14, 2004

Dont count on her to do anything for you quickly...it took over 4 months to change a grade that she screwed up on. Not very accessible to her students. She takes forever to get back to you.

2.0
4.0
PSY341
May 11, 2004

very unhelpful to students. she takes FOREVER to grade papers and change problems with grades. she's full of herself and her social psych research. notes don't make sense, they contain mostly opinions instead of factual information. tests are difficult.

5.0
3.0
PSY341
May 23, 2004

WONDERFUL PROFESSOR! She doesn't take crap from students and that's a good thing. If you do your work you will do well.

3.0
3.0
PSY341
May 25, 2004

one of the most interesting lectures i've ever had. kind of a ****, with really hard tests.

5.0
4.0
SOCPSY
Sep 8, 2004

hard but good! learned A LOT from carol oyster. really insteresting to listen to and really enjoyed her lectures. definately have to study for tests and take time on papers, but worth it!

1.0
3.0
GRPDYNAMIC
Sep 12, 2004

There are other people in this world besides Oyster, but she doesn't know it.She tells people she's a b*tch... and she's right.She lost a couple of my papers and didn't record my first test until the end of the semester.Very rude when going in to see her

1.0
4.0
PSY341
Nov 17, 2004

She is not a good teacher at all, she is rude and self centered, and you will have no idea how you are doing in the class until you get your final grade.

4.0
4.0
PSY341
Nov 17, 2004

I like her a lot. She's rough around the edges but a great teacher. Knows her stuff. Soc. Psych was just like sociology plus psychology so there is a lot of overlap.

4.0
3.0
PSY305
Dec 16, 2004

She is very willing to help students out if they need to have help. The downfall is the fact that she is rather opinionated and its hard to get a good grade on a paper where you disagree with her. Her tests seem easy, but when you get them its not uncommon to have a lower grade than you expected.

2.0
4.0
PSY305
Dec 16, 2004

VERY VERY OPINIONATED! Wow, I have never had a teacher that judgmental towards Christians in my life, I know that there are some bad cases with Christians but she was pretty much just saying that ALL christians are judgmental. Her information didnt go along with her tests at all

2.0
4.0
PSY341
Dec 20, 2004

I've never had a teacher who is so rude. She is good at teaching and explains things well and knows her stuff but her personality is awful. She is VERY unapproachable and rude. She encourages you to approach her if you have a question, but then when you do, she makes you feel horrible.

2.0
4.0
PSY341305
Dec 27, 2004

Horrible teacher. Hard tests. Does not test you on what we learned. Tests random information or on very specific aspects that you would have to read the book 6 times to know the answer. Not approachable; turns you away during her office hours.

3.0
2.0
PSY305
Jan 20, 2005

It is true that she is very opinionated but if you play the game you can easily get an A. All you have to do is write what she expects for the papers. Lectures make you think if nothing else even if you do not agree with her it will help to formulate your own opinions.

2.0
4.0
PSY341
Feb 7, 2005

MEAN and INCONSIDERATE

5.0
3.0
GROUPDYNAMICS
Feb 14, 2005

knows what she's talking about, very helpful if you ask, but you need to know what she's looking for especially on papers, very willing to change things in the class that don't work

5.0
3.0
PSY341
Mar 6, 2005

Well, despite what others may have said, I think she is a great teacher! She gives clear examples to help explain things better and makes class very interesting! Just wonderful.

5.0
2.0
PSY305
Mar 31, 2005

I think she is an AWESOME professor. She is very clear, open to questions, and encourages discussion. She may have opinions, but that is what makes the class so much fun. If you are looking for 'a good time' take this class with Prof. Oyster for sure!

2.0
3.0
PSY341
May 11, 2005

Completely unapproachable. Her tests are random questions, not indicitive of the notes/readings. Her grading on the two papers is solely subjective. She will not cancel class even though she will not be there. She does not like questions and becomes hostile if you disagree or question her.

2.0
1.0
PSY305
Jun 15, 2005

five year olds could write better exams

4.0
2.0
HUMANSEXUALITY
Grade: C
Aug 31, 2005

No Comments

4.0
3.0
PSY305
Oct 3, 2005

She's definitely interesting.

4.0
3.0
PSY341
Nov 2, 2005

I like this class very much. She's so funny but with a dry, sarcastic humor. She tries to give bonus points to the people who show up on fridays and shows videos. The test are kind of hard, but read the book and take notes along the way and they're not that bad.

5.0
2.0
PSY305
Grade: A
Nov 15, 2005

Loved this class! I learned a lot of new and interesting things about sex!

2.0
4.0
ALLPSY
Nov 20, 2005

No Comments

5.0
3.0
PSY341
Dec 12, 2005

She's a great professor. She can be very opinionated, but she has good reason to be. She's passionate about the issues and subject matter. I definitely recommend taking her class... but one piece of advice... DON'T BE LATE! (She hates that.)

1.0
3.0
305
Jan 8, 2006

No Comments

5.0
4.0
HUMANSEXUALITY
Jan 24, 2006

Don't take her unless you're a serious student. She wants you to be honest and serious. If you want to slack off, cheat, or disengage, forget her.

3.0
3.0
PSY305
Mar 6, 2006

I hear she is different in different courses (this being her best). I had her for Human Sexuality and she was a decent professor. Nothing special, but decent and passionated about the topic.

4.0
2.0
PSY341
Apr 15, 2006

She wasn't as hard as many people believe.. her tests are fairly easy.. need to attend class in order to pass.. can't skip.. ever!

3.0
3.0
PSY376
Apr 20, 2006

No Comments

4.0
2.0
PSY341
May 8, 2006

good teacher, pay attention to details and read the book and you'll be fine only 2 papers and 3 tests and a not cumulative final

1.0
2.0
PSY
May 10, 2006

No Comments

1.0
3.0
PSY341
Nov 25, 2006

Don't expect this teacher to help you out in any way. She told the class that she will make an attempt to be nice if you stop by her office, but she doesn't feel that she has to be nice or helpful to students. Shows a lot of movies when she doesn't feel like teaching. Take a different psych elective if you can!

1.0
4.0
PSY341
Feb 22, 2007

You're better off taking this class in the SOC department, at least they are actual social researchers. She writes test questions that are completely subjective to whether or not you agree with her skewed view of the world, if you don't agree you're not going to do well on the tests. Likes to stick irrelevant vocab from the book in her tests.

4.0
2.0
PSY341
Nov 19, 2007

interesting and engaging entertaining

5.0
2.0
PSYALL
Dec 4, 2007

Dr Oyster is amazing! Everyone who thinks she's difficult doesn't understand that YOU'RE IN COLLEGE! You're here to get an education, her tests can be difficult if you don't do the work. Why pay for a class that you learn nothing from? Her class is easily do-able.. take a risk and learn something!

5.0
2.0
PSY305
Jan 31, 2008

Professor Oyster is an amazing lady. She is a good teacher who presents her ideas in a clear fashion. Her powerpoint slides are posted online to print off. She gives statistics and dates but doesn't require much memorization of those facts. She is very knowledgeable on the subject matter and could get into more detail than she does if needed.

2.0
4.0
PSY342
Mar 1, 2008

This teacher is seriously messed up. She teaches social psychology but she herself is riddled with hateful biases that she brings unapologetically into the classroom. She is discriminatory to Christians and contemptuous to anyone who doesn't believe the way she does. Her bad attitude gets old. She tears down rather than builds up. Avoid her!

2.0
3.0
PSYCH305
Mar 12, 2008

She is probably the worst professor I have ever had at uwl. It is interesting how she claims to base everything on research but tends to constantly "makeup stories" on everything she speaks about. It funny how large of a Hypocrite she is. Expect all tests questions to be opinion. Especially on the final in socialpsy (w/abnormal psy ?'s on it)

4.0
5.0
PSY341
May 17, 2008

Easily the most interesting class I have had yet. Great lecturer, always had interesting stories to relate the material to real life. Four exams (multiple choice) and two papers. Not an easy class but definitely interesting and worth the challenge!!

4.0
3.0
PSY341
Jul 24, 2008

Very opinionated and seems inapproachable but is helpful if you ask. Her tests are kinda hard, and she's a tough grader on the papers. But, her final exam is SO easy, she understands we have other finals to study for that may be more important. I was at a B in her class, got 100 on the final with minimal studying and ended with an A in the class :)

4.0
3.0
PSY305
Dec 5, 2008

Difficult grader on papers, but the tests are pretty easy. Make sure you show up because some lecture material is on the exam. She seems unapproachable at first but she was very helpful when I asked for it. Don't turn in assignments late if you want to pass. Can be a bit repetitive and scatterbrained but generally interesting.

3.0
5.0
PSY305
Dec 16, 2008

Far too tough on grading papers

5.0
3.0
PSY205
Dec 17, 2008

Carol was a great teacher. If you feel she is a tough paper grader, then you write poor papers. I always received the grades I deserved. She isn't afraid to treat her class like the mature adults we all should at least be attempting to be. I respect her honest approach and would recommend her to anyone who can appreciate that.

5.0
3.0
PSY247
Apr 9, 2009

I loved Oyster in Social Psych. Tests are easy and based off of powerpoints she posts online. Her paper grading isn't as bad as people say. Just proof read and use spell check and you'll be fine. I thought she was a great lecturer and always had great stories that related to our material.

1.0
4.0
SOC341
Apr 19, 2009

Stay away!

5.0
3.0
PSY341
May 6, 2009

Very good teacher. Her paper grading is a little hard as she rarely gives out A's. Her tests are so easy, just use your commonsense and your at least guaranteed a C on them without studying. Sadly she is only teaching social psy for the next couple years. If you can take her!

2.0
5.0
PSYCH341
Nov 17, 2009

Interesting class, but awful prof. Does not seem to care about students or their success at all. Not very available for help and comes off as too harsh to even make students want to ask for help. No matter how hard studied, got the same grade on exams which seemed fairly subjective. Would NOT recommend!

4.0
3.0
PSY341
Dec 12, 2009

She seems a little unorganized at times but the class is pretty easy and straight foreward. The exams are all multiple choice, she is just a tough grader on the papers

3.0
4.0
ERS110
Dec 28, 2009

We had six grades the whole semester: 4 tests and 2 papers. The papers were graded like English papers; barely anyone got an A. Also, if you came to class 2 minutes late on a day a paper was due to turn it in, it was docked one letter grade. She is very strict. Do NOT take her.

4.0
4.0
ERS110
Jan 25, 2010

Her lectures were interesting, but the material she expected us to know on the test was unpredictable. I read and went to class and studied and never got better than a B on a test. She wasn't helpful telling us what to study. Papers were interesting and she was very clear about what she expected, i did well on those. Okay teacher.

2.0
4.0
PSY341
May 7, 2010

She is one of the worst psych professors at uwl. On the 1st day of lecture she seemed like such a nice lady and very helpful - she is the exact opposite. If you usually get good grades on papers this is not the class for you. I felt like I was in an EFN class all over again and not a psych class. DO NOT RECOMMEND!!!

2.0
3.0
PSY341
May 13, 2010

She is the worst teacher I've ever had, she grades starting from a C. She can talk about the weather and relate it back to gay marriage. She doesn't cover the material that's actually on the test so when you do take it...you're like when did we ever learn this. I actually went to the class and did bad. DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS IF YOU DON'T NEED.

1.0
3.0
PSY341
May 13, 2010

All she talks about is Gay Marriage and how to effectively kill yourself in the class. It has nothing to do with social psychology and in fact, I felt like I was taking The Psychology of Gay Marriage. DO NOT RECOMMEND. Worst class and teacher EVER!

2.0
4.0
PSY341
May 13, 2010

Wouldn't recommend taking this class. The class was interesting but when it came to tests most of the stuff on it we never discussed or went over at all. And her grading of papers is horrible you never know whats wrong with them or how to make them better. Class would be good with a different teacher.

2.0
4.0
PSY341
May 14, 2010

Very opinionated and the slides are hard to follow. Tests are hard and the questions will throw you for a loop, but if you show up and do the work and extra credit, you should do ok.

4.0
3.0
PSY341
May 14, 2010

The tests aren't that bad. I studied her powerpoints and read but there was always some I didn't know where they came from. Her paper grading is pretty hard. She offers a lot of extra credit. Getting a B isn't hard but an A was impossible. Very nice lady though, really enjoyed her lectures.

5.0
3.0
PSY341
May 14, 2010

Carol is a great teacher! Very determined to help you in any way. Lectures are relatable and interesting. Tests are fairly easy-- about 40 multiple choice. She has high standards for papers, but c'mon people, we're college students. Overall I really enjoyed having her!

4.0
3.0
ERS220
Nov 27, 2010

She's very interested and knowledgable on the topic of class and makes her lectures interesting. She reads off powerpoints and there are a lot of notes, but it's not too bad. Tests are decent. Definitely study your notes and do all the readings! Class isn't a lot of work, but getting an A can be difficult.

2.0
4.0
PSY341
Dec 17, 2010

Dr. Oyster is rude, and unapproachable to students. Her grading on papers is very hard. They are graded like English papers instead of Psych papers. A lot of her information is outdated. Avoid her if you can.

1.0
5.0
PSY341
Dec 23, 2010

Do not take this class if you don't need to, Professor Oyster does not care about your grade and is just not a good teacher. It is unfortunate because this could be a great class with a different teacher. I think a lot of students could agree with me.

4.0
4.0
PSY341
Jan 26, 2011

I found tests to be difficult, but most likely because I missed a lot of class. She isn't the most interesting professor but I've definitely had worse. Go to class if you want to do well.

2.0
4.0
PSY341
Feb 15, 2011

Oyster makes little effort to meet students outside of class even during office hours. She tends to be unorganized and even lost a paper of mine. When she didn't lose my papers they were corrected harshly with little feedback. Watch your paragraphing- she wants only 5 sentences roughly per paragraph- rediculous. I would not recommend her.

1.0
2.0
PSY341
May 5, 2011

Do not recommend taking her. She is unfriendly and rude. She was also fairly unorganized and always behind on posting grades which got to be annoying.

2.0
3.0
PSY341
May 8, 2011

She's mean, she's unorganized. I don't understand how she's still teaching. Well she's giving up soc psy. I wonder why? She lost papers, wanted ID #s and still lost papers. Lost tests. Graded horribly. AVOID AT ALL COSTS! Horrible. If you do end up with her SMILE, she's a fool for that. :D even then, toward the end, she will hate you.

5.0
4.0
PSY341
May 10, 2011

she really knows her stuff. interesting topic, i actually enjoyed going to class. our final grades posted within 24 hours of taking the final. people complain about her taking a long time to return papers, she uses ID numbers instead of names and by now if you can't get your ID right, you deserve to wait a couple more days. very cool lady. take her

5.0
4.0
PSY341
May 10, 2011

I loved her!!! This is by far the most interesting psychology class I've taken and it is because of Dr. Oyster. She's tough and she tells you how it's going to be from the first day of class. My class had problems following directions apparently, but all you have to do is pay attention and you will do fine.

4.0
3.0
PSY341
May 10, 2011

Dr. Oyster is fantastic. She's exactly what I expect from a college professor. She is incredibly intelligent and has great experiences to share. She's tough but this is a college course. She expects effort and explains exactly what she wants while always being open to questions via email or in class as well as amending the syllabus. I loved her!

3.0
5.0
PSY341
May 10, 2011

I wouldn't recommend this professor. She was a tough grader on papers, but that was expected. Tests weren't too bad. It took her a really long time to get papers graded and back. She wasn't professional, she used comic sans font for syllabus and rubrics and sent emails that had quite a bit of attitude. She also seemed to be unorganized at times.

3.0
3.0
PSYCH205
Oct 6, 2011

she is very cold. she never returned an email about meeting with her during office hours. went to her office and she was very rude and had the attitude "well theres nothing i can do about it". she made me feel like i was wasting her time. she makes no effort to get to know her students and the D number thing is a joke! we are people, with names!

5.0
2.0
ERS100
Nov 10, 2011

As a first semester freshman, Carol has been a great professor. She offers open-question review sessions before tests, is willing to take constructive criticism in efforts to increase quality of learning, and is extremely down to earth. Recommended taking Ethnic and Racial Studies.

5.0
3.0
ERS100
Nov 10, 2011

I'm currently in my first semester here at UWL and she's at the top of my list for professors. She makes sure you know your stuff but the notes she provides in class are great. Down to earth person and has a good sense of humor in class.

5.0
1.0
ERS100
Nov 30, 2011

She is an excellent professor! She is passionate about what she teaches, and is always looking out for her students. She has many interesting stories that give the class a deeper understanding of the material

2.0
3.0
ERS102
Mar 14, 2012

unreliable.

3.0
1.0
PSY205
Mar 29, 2012

Not sure what I think.. class is boring. Have both tests and papers. None are hard. She offers to proofread the papers but the suggestions are confusing. She is old and cranky. Proceed with Caution

2.0
2.0
PSY205
May 11, 2013

Acts like she's to busy to help students at all, hard to reach, forgets to do things. Tests are very poorly written, it doesn't pay to study and you can't ever see it after to talk about problems. Essays are returned month after and rubric is given two weeks after turned in. Topics are common sense more than psych such as interviewing, funerals,ect

2.0
4.0
PSY321
Grade: A+
Nov 26, 2013

Do not take her. She lost half of our tests and acts like she is better than everyone else. She forgets to do many things and has very poorly written tests.

2.0
4.0
PSY321
Dec 3, 2013

She asks confusing questions on exams and is constantly trying to clarify them on exams. She is very unorganized, doesn't respond to emails when she says you can contact her whenever. She also sends out emails with attitude when she does respond. Lost exams. I would avoid her at all costs

2.0
3.0
ERS490
Apr 8, 2014

If you don't understand something or need help, good luck getting clarification or an e-mail back. For an ERS professor, she doesn't seem open to new ideas or change, and I noticed a lot of micro-aggressions. No tests, two large papers with presentations. I got an A, but did not feel comfortable voicing opinion in class for fear of rejection

2.0
4.0
PSY321
Apr 12, 2014

Very unorganized. Inconsistent. Thinks she's super awesome. Unclear tests with things never talked about. Can be a GPA ruiner if you're not careful.

4.0
3.0
PSY305
Nov 13, 2014

I really enjoyed taking this class. Dr. Oyster is entertaining, the material is interesting, and the time passes quickly. She is relatively unorganized, goes off on a lot of tangents, and her tests are slightly difficult, but overall its a good class and she's a good professor.

2.0
3.0
PSY321
Grade: A
Dec 19, 2014

She was one of the worst professors I've had at UW-L. Her exams are confusing and poorly written. She doesn't respond to emails. She lost and gave us misprinted exams. She is obviously a seasoned researcher in psychology but shouldn't be teaching.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

62% confidence
Based on 4 grades
Most common grades:
A (2)
C (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(3)B(0)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 4 reported grades
A: 2
C: 1
A+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.07 avg change
May
Nov
Dec
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHM105

5.0

(1)

SOCPSY

5.0

(1)

GROUPDYNAMICS

5.0

(1)

PSYALL

5.0

(1)

PSY247

5.0

(1)
+21 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PSYCH341

5.0

SOCPSY

4.0

PSY341305

4.0

ALLPSY

4.0

PSY342

4.0

Similar Professors