3.2

Catherine Lu

Political Science - McGill University

3.2
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
43%
Would Retake
90
Reviews
3.2
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
3.2
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

43%

Would Retake

90

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
90 total ratings

5

26

4

23

3

14

2

17

1

10

What Students Say

I like the way this seminar-style course was organized

POLI433 - 5.0 rating

This class has not been a good experience

POLI362 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

42%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

83% confidence
Based on 11 grades
Most common grades:
A (6)
A- (2)
Not sure yet (2)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(3)
Based on 14 reported grades
A: 6
A-: 2
Not sure yet: 2
B+: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (8)
Tough grader (6)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (3)
Participation matters (2)
Amazing lectures (2)
Inspirational (2)
Lecture heavy (2)
Test heavy (2)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.86 avg change
Apr
Jun
Dec
Jan
Jan
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PS

5.0

(1)

AFEW

5.0

(1)

THEORY

5.0

(1)

POLI223

5.0

(1)

POLI561

5.0

(1)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

POLITICSL

5.0

PS

5.0

POL1160

4.0

INTLTHEO

4.0

POLISCI231

4.0

Reviews (89)
1.0
5.0
POLITICSL
Mar 28, 2002

Terrible teacher. hates the U.S.A. and tries to bias everyone on that theme.

1.0
1.0
232
Apr 22, 2002

No Comments

5.0
4.0
232
Sep 9, 2002

Readings hard but interesting

3.0
3.0
232
Nov 3, 2002

Lectures heavily quote-based. Repeats nothing. Speaks too quickly. Very left.

4.0
4.0
232
Dec 23, 2002

Leftist, yeah, but knows her stuff. Good intro course; hard work but rewarding.

5.0
4.0
POLI232
Jan 27, 2003

a class that promotes genuine thought and not just typical mcgill polisci bordom

2.0
4.0
POLI232
Mar 19, 2003

Funny once in a while and likes Eminem (hehe) but other than that, boring, boring, boooooooooooring!! She can do so much more with the material! I'd have to say, bring a pillow!!

3.0
4.0
POLI232
Mar 28, 2003

Her TA's end up explaining everything better than her. Sometimes she can be very good though. Not as left-wing as some say, but sometimes her comments come out hilariously one-sided.

2.0
4.0
POLI232
Mar 29, 2003

HORRIBLE.

5.0
2.0
POLI242
Apr 1, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
POLI232
Apr 6, 2003

SOOOO BORING! TA had to re-teach everything.

5.0
4.0
POLI232
Apr 7, 2003

She is great. I think she is brillant and can really apply the material to everyday things. She does talk fast but she definitly helps you learn to take good notes, fast.

5.0
1.0
POL232
Jun 18, 2003

I don't know what these people are talking about. Lu is cool, nice and damn sexy. I have nothing negative to say about her.

1.0
2.0
232
Jun 18, 2003

There is no way Lu should be teaching courses. If she gets tenure it will be a sad, sad day. Learn how to communicate your ideas to a wider audience!

2.0
2.0
POLI232
Jul 4, 2003

cannot lecture. has a tendency to say the same thing in different words multiple times throughout lectures. boring as hell and hard to follow.

1.0
3.0
POLI232
Aug 24, 2003

Do you like propaganda with your political theory? Do like pointless lectures? Do you like standard poli sci eval methods? Then step right up!

1.0
4.0
POL1160
Sep 6, 2003

Awful. The worst experience of my undergraduate career. Had a fantastic ta. Pierre.

5.0
5.0
PS
Sep 7, 2003

Sheesh, you'd think she has offended the namby-pamby Liberal and PC elite from Ontario with the comments here.

4.0
3.0
POL232
Sep 9, 2003

I like Lu a lot... she has a great, dry sense of humour and a provocative, intelligent lecture style.

4.0
3.0
POLI232
Nov 23, 2003

Found her to be a little too dry. Also, she seemed to have quite an obvious feminist bias. Not too bad though. My TA was a dick though. While other were handing out A's like candy, he told us B+ was tops.

4.0
3.0
POLI
Dec 13, 2003

I thought she was a good prof and that she taught political theory in an engaging way. If people thought it was dry, it's probably because they find political theory dry. Lu's not hilariously charming but she's got a structured lecture plan.

1.0
3.0
POLI232
Dec 17, 2003

Simply the worst...she should not be teaching at the university level.

5.0
3.0
POLI362
Mar 19, 2004

If you don't like POLI 232 with Lu, you're probably not a political theory person. That's why 200 levels are large classes, and they do indeed "weed out" the non-hardcore. Lu is a bright light in int'l poli theory, and it's been a pleasure takin

3.0
3.0
POLI212
Mar 21, 2004

Very dull teacher

3.0
3.0
POLI232
Mar 29, 2004

Political theory is boring, but she doesn't help it AT ALL. Monotone voice, "um...uhh"...she seems like a very nice lady, but is a horrible lecturer.

4.0
3.0
POLI232
Mar 31, 2004

Catherine Lu really knows her political theory; she's an excellent professor. However, it's political theory, not to be confused with political fun. Don't take this class unless you're into philosophy and politics. Oh, and Dan is NOT a good TA.

2.0
3.0
POLI232
Grade: A
Apr 2, 2004

A horrible dull prof. Sitting through her lectures was pure torture.

4.0
4.0
INTLTHEO
May 28, 2004

No Comments

2.0
2.0
POLI232
Jul 2, 2004

Knows her theory to the extent that she's available to convey information from some basic texts. As an instructor, she's pedantic, and unoriginal.

2.0
2.0
POLI232
Sep 16, 2004

Easy marker but her lectures were painful to sit through. Dull and unoriginal with some bizarre obsession with Orwell...

3.0
3.0
POLI232
Oct 21, 2004

Lu knows HER political theory and thus, presents an extremely one-sided view of political theory.

1.0
5.0
232
Grade: A
Oct 22, 2004

Another intellectual-wannabee.....

5.0
4.0
POLI232
Nov 30, 2004

Now that I am done at McGill, I can say that Professor Lu was one of my favourite lecturers. I find her articulate and captivating. Political Theory is not for everyone, but for those who love it, Lu is a great professor.

5.0
3.0
POLI232
Dec 2, 2004

Best class I've taken at McGill so far ! Maybe not the most fascinating lecturer but hey, it's not showbiz it's a university class.Liked her idea of starting from Orwell and building on themes of liberty,equality and community. I've used the coursepack more than once for papers in other courses ...

1.0
4.0
POLISCI231
Dec 7, 2004

Pathetic. Wet-noodle liberalism under a veneer of objectivity and inclusivism. Pax liberalis

2.0
3.0
POLI232
Feb 17, 2005

I'd rather go to the dentist than sit that class again. She's been known to laugh at genunine student questions during 200+ people lectures--learning was never so awful.

4.0
1.0
POLI242
Feb 17, 2005

HOT, HOT, HOT!!! Great TAs as well

5.0
4.0
AFEW
May 19, 2005

Kind. Conducts idiotic research. Judge for yourself.

5.0
3.0
POLI362
Aug 14, 2005

Best theory class taken at McGill. She teaches with confidence and authority. Exams very fair, focused on analysis and not memorization. Is socially awkward and can seem cold. Perhaps being mobbed by students from her large classes has left her jaded. Pity.

1.0
4.0
POLI232
Grade: A-
Sep 11, 2005

She is the most inconsiderate and boring professor I have had at McGill. She makes interesting ideas uninteresting and discourages students by making them feel like idiots.

2.0
3.0
POLI362
Grade: A
Nov 9, 2005

Most unclear, unorganized, uninspiring poli theory prof i've ever had. Lectures are boring and hard to follow, with lots of irrelevant reading. Invokes pity, not respect.

2.0
4.0
POLI232
Mar 12, 2006

BORING.... and unclear, and unhelpful... won't answer questions clearly, and lectures monotonously.

3.0
3.0
POLI232
Mar 30, 2006

She can be summed up in one word: AVERAGE. She isn't horrible, and she definately isn't great. She has a clear voice, yet speaks high and is monotonous. Classes are actually quite boring. I like how the course is evaluated though.

4.0
3.0
POLI362
Apr 9, 2006

knows her stuff, presents interesting topics, and a clear speaker.

3.0
3.0
POLITHEORY
Apr 19, 2006

I don't know why ppl r saying she is disorganized cause she has overheads which she follows very clearly. I agree that she is average, shes not terrible- but i'm not terribly eager to go to her classes either. I found that she did encourage questions in our class+in fact wasted SO much time answering them. Always ran over class time too

3.0
2.0
POLI232
Apr 26, 2006

Lectures are clear but boring. She is well-organized but does not fit in any time for questions. Her boring delivery is too difficult too comprehend without a question period. The material is easier to understadn if you do the readings and see your TAs. Take the course if you're intersted in theory as I am.

5.0
3.0
THEORY
Apr 27, 2006

Amazing professor! Throughly articulate, painfully organized, inevitably inspiring. Brought theory to life. Great themes, great assignments, great readings. Puts in lot of effort and attention to a 200 level class and cares for her students. One of the best profs at McGill. Great TAs too.

3.0
3.0
232
Jun 8, 2006

She knows her stuff but really isn't clear. I had a hard time following her and where she was going with all this theory that I didn't understand. I got lost really quickly. She IS organized, however.

5.0
2.0
POLI232
Oct 1, 2006

the course is very interesting

4.0
1.0
POLI300
Oct 19, 2006

I took two classes with her. Political Theory and International Relations Theory. She is a good person, though the material is dry. You can choose sections of material to focus on and do your exam questions and paper on just that....

5.0
3.0
POLI232
Dec 20, 2006

Ms. Lu is a great teacher whose dedication comes through quite clearly (along with an- occasionally- liberal leaning) I found most people who found fault with her tended to be disguising their own lack of will to do the work.

4.0
3.0
POLI232
Jan 10, 2007

The class was fairly interesting, and Prof. Lu is a decent lecturer but not a particularly outstanding one. She tended to speak in run-on sentences so note-taking during lectures was a challenge. The course was not recorded though I had another class in Adams Aud. which was. The mandatory conferences were very helpful, I had Jeff Bercuson as my TA.

5.0
2.0
POLI232
Feb 2, 2007

I found the course content to be scattered and couldn't see how the key concepts tied together. However, Prof. Lu is well-spoken, charismatic, engaging, and really tried her best to make the content as interesting and relevant as possible; a true challenge given the deadpan and tedious nature of most of the readings. Exams are fair and predictable.

4.0
4.0
POLI232
Apr 2, 2007

I loved Poli232, but I can see how someone who doesn't like the material might not like the class. Is a MUST for anyone interested in pol. theory. I personally found her lecture style wonderful, although it was necessary to keep up with the heavy readings to understand them. Work hard and you'll get the most out of this wonderful prof and class.

2.0
3.0
POLI232
Apr 21, 2007

Had her for modern political thought. boring lecturer and paper wasn't marked very easily. exams were pretty easy and completely based on the text. the material was definitely interesting but she didn't add very much to it. I barely went to class and still did okay.

3.0
4.0
POLI232
Jun 10, 2007

If you're really interested in Political Theory, take the class. If you're on the fence, this class will probably make you hate it. She almost seemed bored in lecture...

4.0
4.0
POLI232
Jan 10, 2008

A very good prof. Was a wonderful introduction to political theory, and she made you think. Lu knows her stuff, and knows how to teach.

5.0
3.0
POLI232
Feb 21, 2008

This class & her lectures to this day remain in my head & have proven relevant & useful for every single other polisci class I've taken since! She made dull & burdenous material interesting & relevant while lecturing & a prof that will provide you a firm foundation for the rest of your polisci studies at McGill!

5.0
3.0
POLI232
Sep 3, 2008

No Comments

3.0
5.0
POLI362
Apr 30, 2009

Terrible lectures, very boring and hard to understand. Only take this class if you absolutely have to.

3.0
4.0
POLI362
Oct 15, 2011

She is rather boring in lecture and her delivery of PowerPoint is rather quick and vague to be of use to anyone. She also has quite a big bias towards one ideology that she will consistently push through her lecture.

4.0
4.0
POLI232
Mar 22, 2012

Many people who dislike this prof had Abizadeh first. He is amazing, but people expect too much. Prof Lu is consistent, clear, and solid. Nothing amazing, but if you show up to class and take your notes (no computers allowed) you will do fine. This is where you find out whether you actually like poli theory or you're just in it for the prof.

4.0
2.0
POLI232
Apr 3, 2012

People who don't like her either don't like poli theory to begin with or aren't good at it. Prof. Lu is a good, clear lecturer although seemingly shy. She is EXTREMELY approachable and very helpful in answering questions, especially 1-1. Readings are short and essays aren't graded harshly. The key to an A is conference attendance/participation!

4.0
2.0
POLI232
Nov 24, 2012

Boring prof, though material is straight forward. Unless you're a poli sci major, do not take it. Essays are fairly graded and their goal is clear. Too many readings for an intro class. I was falling asleep during most classes, but if you do not go, you can't get a good mark as she posts nothing online, but her powerpoint questions.

5.0
3.0
POLI362
Dec 14, 2012

I'm confused with the negativity Dr. Lu has received on this website. She is a very clear lecturer, is quite passionate about the subject matter and is very approachable. As someone doing a political theory minor, this was a great course.

4.0
1.0
POLI362
Dec 16, 2012

Lu is a clear, considered lecturer--perhaps not as flashy as Abizadeh, but she can be unsuspectingly hilarious at times (ask anyone who saw her stand-up improv prior to the Waldron lecture). The class is immensely interesting and easily the most enjoyable class I've had this semester; a must-take for people interested in theory and IR.

4.0
4.0
POLI232
Mar 20, 2013

She was super unorganized but really interested in her material! She was adorable too.

5.0
2.0
POLI223
Apr 11, 2013

Dr. Lu is well organized, interesting and has a great capacity for abstraction. She is not spectacular, but can be surprising.

4.0
3.0
POLI232
Apr 15, 2013

Prof Lu can be disorganized but the class is super interesting. The key to a good grade resides in attendance and participation, and participation means doing the readings. They can be a bit difficult but they are super interesting if you like political thought and philosophy.Super helpful at office hours,I advice you to talk to her,she will help!

4.0
4.0
POLI232
Nov 8, 2013

She talks way too much and always goes over lecture time. I end up with 5+ pages of notes every lecture. There are also too many readings for an into class. It's very tough to get a decent grade on the 2 midterm essays. Avoid.

5.0
1.0
POLI232
Nov 25, 2013

Best Teacher ever :)

2.0
5.0
POLI232
Dec 3, 2013

No laptops in class. Talks to fast. No lecture slides or notes posted online. Attendance is mandatory if you want to have the slightest clue what's happening. Attending conference and submitting a page of notes each time is MANDATORY. Would NOT recommend.

4.0
3.0
POLI232
Dec 21, 2013

Prof Lu is a great lecturer and has an amazing way with words. Lecture notes are not on powerpoint nor posted online but it is fairly easy to take notes in class. She is very clear with what she wants in her essays, although the TAs are hard markers. Final wasn't bad - 3 short answer, one essay question and a quote ID section. Participate in conf.

4.0
3.0
POLI232
Apr 12, 2014

She doesn't allow laptops in her lectures so you have to take handwritten notes, which can get tedious. She also doesn't post anything online, and tends to go overtime in lectures. There is a large amount of readings (sometimes a book a week) but she does a good job of clarifying the material in lectures and conferences are usually good.

5.0
3.0
POLI433
Grade: A-
Dec 28, 2014

I like the way this seminar-style course was organized. There's a lot of work, but it's very incremental. The texts we read are historical gemstones and highly engaging (more depth than breadth). Professor Lu herself is a very nice lady and even with her rules, the environment she creates is not pressuring, but stimulating.

3.0
3.0
POLI231
Apr 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Took her class because it's necessary for my major, if it wasn't for the credits you could just read the books and get the same amount out of it. Spent nearly every lecture just summarizing the readings.

2.0
4.0
POLI231
Grade: B+
Apr 26, 2018
Wouldn't take again

her lectures for this class are kind of useless. i went to 3 lectures all year and did fine. readings are ok, pretty boring, essay marking is comparable to philosophy (youre usually gonna get a B). ok class if you like philosophy and poli sci

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
4.0
POLI231
Grade: A
May 10, 2018
Would take again

Lu is a really good lecturer, but assigns a lot of reading. Attend all classes, write down as much as you can, read as much as you can (though you can get away with not doing all of the readings), attend and participate in all conferences and you will absolutely do well. Con: she's pretty inaccessible, and takes so long to conduct grade reviews

Get ready to read
Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
4.0
POLI362
Dec 5, 2018
Would take again

She is such an incredible lecturer, and is passionate about what she teaches. By far my most enjoyable class this semester despite the huge amounts of reading. If you don't like reading, you'll find this class hard, but it is also a must-take for those interested in Political Theory and International Relations.

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
POLI362
Dec 16, 2018
Would take again

This has been my favorite Political Science class at McGill so far. Lu's lectures are really interesting, though she can go over time quite often. She responds to email fairly quickly and is always personable. The only down-side of the class is the large amount of readings, but I've found skimming is ok because she covers the readings well in class

Get ready to read
Inspirational
Amazing lectures
2.0
4.0
POLI362
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 7, 2020
Wouldn't take again

This class has not been a good experience. Although the topics were interesting, the lectures were poorly organized and with a fast and non-stop speech rate, all the while being information-intensive making them hard to follow. The slides were not useful: most contained only questions and sometimes quotes or secondary information.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
2.0
5.0
POLI362
Grade: Incomplete
Apr 21, 2022

This was the hardest course I've taken at McGill. Lu's powerpoints make the course hard to keep up with and the lectures are very dense. Also, you are graded with very little feedback which makes it hard to improve. I would not recommend this class.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
2.0
4.0
POLI362
Grade: B-
Apr 25, 2022

I was okay with her teaching the whole semester but she literally deleted all lecture recordings and slides from MyCourses right before the final. I do not see the logic behind this and find it purely evil and absolutely sick ! Like who does that ?? Do not recommend at ALL, don't set yourself up for failure

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
1.0
4.0
POLI362
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 28, 2022

This professor does not allow laptops in class and only handwritten notes, gives wayyyy too many readings (up to a full book and another 50 pages a week). Lectures are extremely boring, monotone with little information on the slides. On top of all of this, she removed all the slides and lectures one week before the final. Would not recommend.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
5.0
4.0
POLI362
Grade: A+
Jun 13, 2022
Would take again

Lu is perhaps one of the most underrated professors in the political science department. Smart as a whip in both theory and IR, generous and responsive over email, and compelling enough to make her 8:30s worth it. If you have any interest in justice, human rights, international politics, theory, or war, definitely take one of her classes!

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Inspirational
2.0
4.0
POLI433
Grade: A
Dec 23, 2023

Very unclear guidelines for how to get a "good" grade in the class. Lectures overall very mundane and uninteresting; it was hard to stay attentive and keep listening. Considering the level of writers analyzed and their contribution to the history of political thought, a far more interesting class could have been made. It felt like she didn't care.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Test heavy
2.0
3.0
POLI433
Jan 14, 2024

The material was extremely interesting but Professor Lu failed to make it interesting in most lectures. Coming to class felt like a chore rather than an exciting opportunity to learn. Definitely very good readings though, but the class delivery lacked enthusiasm for the subjects.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
POLI561
Grade: A
Jan 28, 2025
Would take again

Excellent professor.

Clear grading criteria
Caring
Respected
5.0
3.0
POLI433
Dec 25, 2025
Would take again

This class, especially the Hobbes, the Social Contract, and the Locke readings, taught me a great perspective. Most importantly, through the content, Professor Lu made me realize the responsibility I have to keep my word as a way to build a respectful, dynamic, and authentic political community. It was quite a valuable experience.

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

42%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

83% confidence
Based on 11 grades
Most common grades:
A (6)
A- (2)
Not sure yet (2)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(3)
Based on 14 reported grades
A: 6
A-: 2
Not sure yet: 2
B+: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (8)
Tough grader (6)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (3)
Participation matters (2)
Amazing lectures (2)
Inspirational (2)
Lecture heavy (2)
Test heavy (2)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.86 avg change
Apr
Jun
Dec
Jan
Jan
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PS

5.0

(1)

AFEW

5.0

(1)

THEORY

5.0

(1)

POLI223

5.0

(1)

POLI561

5.0

(1)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

POLITICSL

5.0

PS

5.0

POL1160

4.0

INTLTHEO

4.0

POLISCI231

4.0

Similar Professors