2.7

Charles Wallis

Philosophy - California State University Long Beach

2.7
Quality
3.5
Difficulty
30%
Would Retake
148
Reviews
2.7
Quality
3.5
Difficulty
2.9
Helpful
2.5
Clarity

30%

Would Retake

148

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

22

4

28

3

36

2

32

1

30

What Students Say

Please do yourself a favor and don't take this god awful class

PHIL170 - 1.0 rating

The worst part is that he writes all the material himself

PHI170 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

59%

Textbook Required

79%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

95% confidence
Based on 33 grades
Most common grades:
A (12)
Not sure yet (9)
B+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(4)C(5)D(4)F(1)A-/B+(6)
Based on 46 reported grades
A: 12
Not sure yet: 9
B+: 5
A+: 3
Common Tags
Lecture heavy (18)
Get ready to read (17)
EXTRA CREDIT (16)
Test heavy (10)
Tough grader (9)
Skip class? You won't pass. (7)
Clear grading criteria (6)
Lots of homework (6)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.48 avg change
Nov
Dec
May
Aug
Dec
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

COGSCI

5.0

(1)

PHIL483

4.0

(2)

PHILOSOPHY

3.5

(2)

PHIL160

3.0

(47)

170

3.0

(4)
+11 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHILPHIL

5.0

PHILOSOPHY170

5.0

PHIL382

4.8

170

4.5

PHIL101

4.0

Reviews (148)
5.0
2.0
PHIL170
May 24, 2003

Take him during the winter session, he would let us out 2 hours early almost everyday! Hes easy, just do the homework and its an easy B

3.0
3.0
PHIL170
Sep 11, 2003

This was a pretty tough class. Make sure to keep all your tests cuz he screwed me over and gave me a D. I had to find him the following semester and prove that I deserved a B. But, his lecture notes are online so u don't have to go to class!!

3.0
2.0
PHIL170
Dec 10, 2003

Wallis trys very hard to be funny and sometime he succeeds. i find his class to very fun and easy if you do your homework and come to class especially on review days. Hints to passing the test is to review his pass test on his website.

4.0
3.0
PHILOSOPHY
May 6, 2004

hes a funny guy. Class is entertaining. His tests are fair and his occasional hw questions are easy points. just put out a fair amount of effort and youll get a good grade

5.0
2.0
PHIL170
Jul 1, 2004

Had him during the winter session and he made it worth it. Do the assigned work and you should be ok. Some people really like him, but he can be offensive. Overall I though he was a trip!

3.0
1.0
PHILOSOPHY
Aug 4, 2004

I had him for Philosophy of Psychology. I didn't like doing the take home projects, but it gave me a lot of points. There were no exams---all paper. Each one had to be atleast 3 pages. Half of the time, I didn't understand what he was talking about--

5.0
1.0
PHIL170
Dec 1, 2004

Funny. Good teacher overall..Likes to crack jokes but overall easy teacher.....

3.0
2.0
PHIL170
Jan 12, 2005

He loves the subject that he teaches and trys to make it fun. My sugestion would be to take it with a friend, or youll be bored all semester. Tests are easy and he puts the lecture notes on the website. He also tends to wear shirts that are a little too short so watch out! over all nice guy!!!!!

1.0
2.0
PHIL100
May 4, 2005

Mumbles to himself all the time. Cant understand what he is talking about. Has a very sweaty and gross back.

3.0
1.0
PHIL100
May 6, 2005

very easy! puts all lectures on beachboard so u dont have to even attend class. there's small groups though and the t.a. takes role but thats about it. u have like 10 online homeworks so it's a piece of cake. i'm getting an A & so will you! he gives study guides & the tests are off it. 3 tests only!

5.0
3.0
PHIL100
Jun 8, 2005

Says he teaches to help people and seemed to want to help you think clearly. He challenges your beliefs, so some people might get offended.

5.0
2.0
COGSCI
Jun 16, 2005

This guy is a little crazy, but smart as hell. His humor is dry and his slideshows are corny, but he is always willing to help. No need to go to class, unless you are in college to learn something! In other words, if you are stupid, don't bother coming (you can still get an A), because you will be slowing the whole class down.

3.0
1.0
PHIL100
Jul 13, 2005

stopped showing to class after 2 weeks,got an A. show for the 3 exams (essays, picks 3/4 questions straight from study guide.) no textbook, readings on website, as is the hw. seems like he mumbles to himself a lot, kooky guy, entertaining lecture slides (all posted online) using cartoon characters. definitely recommended if u want an easy A

2.0
3.0
PHIL100
Grade: A+
Aug 25, 2005

i HATED this class because of him. he was often late for class, randomly decided to not have class on fridays, which isn't a bad thing, but his lectures were so freaking boring that i stopped going the last month of the semester.

5.0
1.0
PHIL100
Sep 1, 2005

EASY A!

5.0
1.0
PHIL100
Sep 4, 2005

Easy A for sure! Nice guy... kinda cheesy, really dry humor. All in all pretty decent course.

5.0
1.0
PHIL170
Jan 27, 2006

wallis is hilarious. the class itself is pretty boring but he's pretty easy and he keeps everybody laughing. i thought i had a B but he gave me an A with almost no work outside of class. take him

5.0
4.0
PHIL160
May 19, 2006

Smart, lectures on web, review questions, practice tests

3.0
3.0
PHIL160
May 20, 2006

Not THAT easy. Don't need to buy book. Lecture slides on pwrpt that u can print out. HW everyweek on beachboard. Occassional ex credit. Small group discussion meetings on Fri. 3 exams of 4 short answer essays. Q's come from study questions, but he gave about 10 from each topic, so there was about 40 Qs to study and only 4 were on the test-insane!

4.0
2.0
PHIL160
May 27, 2006

Class is boring. He knows his stuff but cant teach it very well. Talks to himself during lectures alot. Has practice tests and lectures online. Self taught with little help from small study session, which was mandatory. Easy i guess.

5.0
2.0
PHIL160
May 27, 2006

He's a really nice guy, always answers all your questions. Always cracking jokes in class. All lectures are posted online, you don't need the textbook. Material is sometimes hard to follow so I would recommend attending the small group discussions. Practice tests make studying for the tests so much easier!

3.0
4.0
PHIL101
Nov 15, 2006

he was ok but the class is difficult

5.0
1.0
PHIL160
Nov 15, 2006

Boring lectures, but can get funny at times. The class is very easy, just go to class and study off the practice questions for the tests. That is practically the test!!

5.0
3.0
PHIL160
Dec 6, 2006

NO TEXTBOOK. All lectures are online. There are weekly hw online, but he gives out a lot of extra credit. Attend Friday classes, or you will fail. Tests questions are online, but out of 10 questions, he pick 4, so you don't know which question he is asking. All his tests are ESSAY questions. He is a funny and likeable guy. =)

2.0
5.0
PHIL160
Dec 6, 2006

Good and Intresting Lecturer, just a hard subject to grasp.

3.0
5.0
PHIL160
Dec 8, 2006

The teacher is a nice person. But it is very difficult to grasp the material. If taking this class you will have to dedicate a lot of time. All lecture slides and homework is online. Be sure to attend all small group discussions they are very helpful.

2.0
3.0
PHIL160
Dec 8, 2006

Class was hard for me, some get it and some dont..i never went to lectures because lectures were online, except the mandatory friday classes. the tests are ok if u know what the heck he is actually talking about

2.0
5.0
PHIL160
Jan 2, 2007

Not a very good professor...hard to understand...mumbles a lot...hard subject to grasp...not recommended to take first year...

4.0
3.0
PHIL160
Jan 6, 2007

The lecture slides are online, and I never went to class, only the review sessions and got an A. He is very helpful through email, and with a moderate amount of studying you'll do great!

5.0
4.0
PHIL160
Jan 20, 2007

Funny. Has lots of help for students: slides online, study questions, practice test questions, lecture outlines, summaries of important concepts. You won't do well in this class if you don't want to read or think.

4.0
2.0
PHIL160
May 20, 2007

the class was very enjoyable. he is funny and wants people to enjoy the class. lectures are not mandatory but small groups are. he posts his lectures online and they are straight forward and usually include everything you will need to know. don't buy a textbook, it's pointless and not required. homework is pretty easy. tests are difficult if you don't study, but they are straight from the lecture.

2.0
4.0
PHIL382
Jun 20, 2007

The class, the teacher, the material---they're all a mess. Wallis is not clear about what is expected of students. Doesn't clarify at all what we're extracting from the material. My recommendations are to either wait for Tang to get better and take it, but if you must, keep up with the reading and ask a LOT of question IN CLASS.

5.0
1.0
PHIL170
Jun 20, 2007

Took class during summer and it was ez. Bought the book and only use it to do HW. Test pretty much ez. He gives you past test. I just study those and got A's. He is a funny teach whom pick on every1 during class and make fun of them.

2.0
5.0
PHIL160
Oct 25, 2007

He's a horrible teacher thats a bore. Theres a lot of typo's in his notes.

2.0
4.0
PHIL160
Nov 17, 2007

Horrible teacher. Hard to understand what he says and wants. The lecture slides are really confusing because he tries to make them funny. I don't recommend taking him at all.

1.0
5.0
PHIL160
Nov 19, 2007

He is a garbage teacher that shouldn't be called a teacher. I don't understand a word he's saying and I get A on the test without a lecture. No textbok, but if you take him be prepared to fall a sleep and stair at his damn dog he brings to class.

2.0
5.0
PHIL160
Nov 30, 2007

by far the worst teach ive ever had in my entire educational career.

2.0
5.0
PHIL160
Dec 6, 2007

He mumbles a lot. and brings his dog to class with is really distracting. His lecture slides are in the form of cartoons and are SO hard to understand. The only way i passed the class is the Friday small group sessions because the GA told us what would be on the test.

4.0
3.0
PHIL160
Dec 6, 2007

He is so confusing in lecture. You must sit in front of the class to fully understand what he is saying. He tends to ramble on, but read the readings beforehand and it will help you understand what he is lecturing about. Always attend GA activity help. GA's and study sessions are the ones that will help you pass the class.

4.0
4.0
PHIL160
Dec 7, 2007

you dont really need to attend class. take advantage of the fact that he puts the lectures and study questions with answers online. the tests are essays. I didnt think it was too hard, but it definitely requires a lot of studying the night before the test. Attend the GA class, they pretty much give you the questions and answers to the test.

4.0
5.0
PHIL160
Dec 14, 2007

WELL HE WAS FUN BUT STILL BORING

1.0
5.0
PHIL160
Dec 14, 2007

as those before me have written, GO TO THE GA MEETINGS! they help the most. wallis is incomprehensible. uses too many big words and has a hard time explaining himself. everyone did poorly on the first test. going to the lectures was pointless, but i did anyway. he seems kind of bias toward religion. he was funny but the dog was distracting. AVOID!

2.0
4.0
JOUR160
Jan 7, 2008

The professor was difficult to understand and wasn't clear. He also brought his dog to every class which was very distracting. The only advice I can give you is to go to the GA meetings on Friday.. it's the only way to understand what's going on. Going to the regular lecture isn't necessary because all the slides are posted online.

5.0
4.0
PHIL482
Jan 16, 2008

He is smart, intelligent and awesome :) His lecture notes are well prepared and he's frequently updated his notes before each class. Take his class! His class is actually not that harsh.

3.0
2.0
PHIL160
Jan 23, 2008

pretty easy class. don't need a next book for his class. All the readings are on his web site. The hw/ec he gives us is online, multiple choice. Really easy. His tests are essay questions. Not that hard. Hard to understand his lectures so I didn't really attend. Attendance is a must when you are with his GA's. GA's are more understandable. Got an A

1.0
5.0
PHILPHIL
Jan 28, 2008

Hi is HORRIBLE!!! he stares at the floor the whole time and you cannot hear anything that he says. Sit in the front of the lecture, and if you get a T.A. that doesn't make sence, switch. that is where you learn everyting.

3.0
5.0
PHIL160
Feb 1, 2008

his jokes are funny, if you understand them. hes kinda schizo, paces alot. the GA discussion are the only time attendance counts and they teach you everything. he seems like he would be a really good upper division teacher but sometimes forgets it is lower division. every test is blue book. just know your terms and listen to the GA's

1.0
5.0
PHIL382
Sep 5, 2008

There was no way I was going to walk away from this class without an A. I had to put up with his nonsensical lectues and f-ing crazy ass dog for a whole semester. The guy acts like he's a misunderstood genius on campus, but all he is a failed wannabe arena football star. (And I obtained this information from the teacher's pet.) Don't take him.

2.0
4.0
PHIL482I
Nov 20, 2008

If you want to get your money's worth get a different professor. He is UNORGANIZED, laughs at his own jokes, brought his dog to class which was a distraction, did i mention UNORGANIZED...cause seriously he is...totally waste of time and his lectures are not up to date..all in all HORRIBLE!

3.0
3.0
PHIL160
Dec 3, 2008

the GAs will save you in this class. You dont have to go to Wallis's lectures and they are posted online for you. GO to the GA meetings and you will be fine. Tests were hard but do-able. The overall subject stinks and i think the class could have been a lot harder so take him to get this class over with!! oh and you dont have to buy any text books!

1.0
4.0
PHIL160
Dec 10, 2008

Definitely not the greatest teacher. I maintained a GPA of 4.0 in high school, but willingly chose to fail this class because I hated his teaching method so much... and all those homework assignments and lecture slides with typos, wrong due dates... If you get a good GA, you will be able to pass... if you get a bad GA, like myself,... yikes.

1.0
3.0
PHIL160
Dec 13, 2008

Absolutely ridiculous. Consistently says "and uh..." and doesn't get his point across. Bipolar. Definitely a great class to nap in for those who suffer from insomnia. ;] Facebook and Myspace all you want. His powerpoints are loaded with corny and irrelevant information. Don't take him for the small meetings-- actually, don't take him period.

3.0
4.0
PHIL160
Jan 3, 2009

His lectures were confusing a at times. But he posts them online. Go to the GA meetings! Tests are hard. Study, especially the night before the tests. You don't need a text book.

2.0
4.0
PHIL160
Jan 22, 2009

horrible. lectures straight from powerpoints which are online. difficult to understand since he mumbles and always looks at the floor. GAs are helpful; go to GA meetings-some clairity there. take someone else if at all possible!

1.0
5.0
PHIL382
May 15, 2009

WOW! We took a test in the beginning of the year, and didn't get it back until towards the end and had to puch out three more test in the last month. DON'T TAKE HIM!Unorganized, annoying. Just don't take him. You've been warned.

2.0
4.0
PHIL160
May 18, 2009

I hated this class. Attendance is not mandatory, only on Fridays, when we met with his GAs, who were much more helpful than him. His lectures were hard, and so were the tests. They are short answer tests, and I just relied on the GAs lectures. This class is confusing, but I had to take it for a business major.

2.0
5.0
PHIL160
Nov 6, 2009

tests are really hard and the GAs are a lot more helpful!

3.0
3.0
PHIL160
Dec 8, 2009

I could not stand him at first, but he's a smart guy and funny (sometimes). He's not that clear when he speaks, so goodluck. You have to work hard if you want an A, mainly just memorization. I don't think I'd recommend this class honestly, but if you want a challenge, go for it! AND PLEASE GO TO DISCUSSIONS WITH HIS GAs. You'll need it, trust me!

3.0
4.0
PHIL160
Dec 9, 2009

It is difficult to understand his lectures. It's very important to attend the Friday classes, because the GA's break down what the lectures are about. Attendance is mandatory. I did not pass the class and I advise you to not take this professor.

3.0
3.0
PHILO160
Dec 11, 2009

This class takes a lot of dedication. Wallis is hilarious and charismatic. There are only four test and easy multiple choice HW which is online. However, you have to really study for the test because the topic is generally confusing. His T.As are the ones that really help you but you only see them for 50 min once a week. Good luck

5.0
4.0
PHIL160
Dec 20, 2009

This is by no means an easy class, but a very fulfilling one. Lecture style is a bit different (presented as a dialogue between the philosopher and usually a cartoon character). Attendance technically isn't mandatory, but you probably can't pass without it. The GA meetings on Fridays are EXTREMELY helpful. Very funny, sometimes unclear.

3.0
5.0
PHIL160
May 19, 2010

This professor is very hard to understand. From what ive heard the GAs are supposed to be helpful but mine didnt seem like he knew what he was doing. he sat there and just pretty much talked to himself

3.0
5.0
PHIL382
May 30, 2010

PHIL 382 is a survey class of epistemology, spanning ancient Western epistemology (i.e. Plato) to contemporary Western epistemology; with an emphasis on the latter. I would highly recommend this class if you are interested in graduate school for philosophy, otherwise I wouldn't take this class.

2.0
4.0
PHIL160
Oct 19, 2010

Really difficult material to understand. His lecture slides are also difficult to understand, because they are worded very strangely (bad grammar, run-ons). More often than not, his lecture slides talk in circles to try to fit the "conversation" between a person and the cartoon character. Study for his tests - they require elaborate answers.

4.0
4.0
PHIL160
Dec 9, 2010

Hard material but he tries to help. Provides all lectures online, many questions to study from, will answer any questions at his office hours (will even stay late). The tests are straight from the lectures and reading online (no textbook) and are 3 questions in essay format. Attendance counts towards grade but doesn't check everyday. Very dry humor and sarcastic. Overall I recommend him if you are willing to think and study hard with good effort.

4.0
1.0
PHIL160
Dec 10, 2010

He lectures and you leave. Take good notes and go to the study sessions before tests, they are very helpful. He puts up study guides, sample tests, and homework on beach board so check it regularly because as you well know profs wont tell you when something is due. Four tests total three questions each short answers be specific give examples. Easy.

3.0
4.0
PHIL160
Dec 10, 2010

Monotonous but subject is interesting enough to keep you interested. The GAs grade arbitrarily. Got marked down for not using a certain

3.0
3.0
PHIL160
Dec 16, 2010

Spends too much time degrading himself and trying to make people laugh. Sometimes it's funny, but he's too excessive about it. His GA's are much more helpful than he is. Test grading is very precise and it's pretty brutal. His lectures are pretty awkward and the slides make it hard to understand. Just really awkward. No huge red flags though.

4.0
4.0
PHIL160
Dec 19, 2010

Hard material to understand and talks in circles during his power points. Attendance required for 10% of grade but optional textbook (you don't need it). Provides many study questions and they really help. He posts his lectures online which is useful to study with. Gives homework once a week which add up and offers a lot of extra credit opportunities. He words his examples very lengthy and wordy so you need to break them down. 4 tests all with 3 questions in essay format. Hard grader. Got a B.

2.0
5.0
PHIL160
Dec 24, 2010

Spare yourself and do not take this class.

2.0
4.0
PHIL170
Dec 27, 2010

Half the class dropped him in the first week and those who remained chose to sit in the back of the class leaving the first two or three rows empty..That's how bad it was...

4.0
3.0
PHIL160
Dec 29, 2010

He's a lot to handle. This class takes severe dedication. Go to class & sit close. There's weekly homework but tons of extra credit! He has review sessions before exam days- go to them! The GA's do grade really tough. Take advantage of the practice essay questions & lecture slides he posts online!! Got an A so I know what I'm talking about.

3.0
4.0
PHIL160
Jan 22, 2011

hard to understand, test grading is BRUTAL. This class gave me my first C ever. wallis is a nice guy, funny, and generous with extra credit, but spare yourself and try to avoid taking this for a G.E.

1.0
5.0
PHIL170
May 27, 2011

Very difficult class. Get the textbook, that's the best way to get through. He's not helpful. Going to his office hours is daunting. Really funny and cool in class, but has some views on life that might bother some people. Be wary.

2.0
4.0
PHIL100
Aug 24, 2011

Pretty tough class. You have to make sure you fully understand the topics that are being covered. Go to S.I that's where I learned everything!! Nice teacher.. I barely got a B

1.0
4.0
PHIL170
Aug 28, 2011

Lectures were boring to say the least and power points were very difficult to understand being as they were in cartoon form. Tests aren't very difficult as long as you do the reading and take his pre-tests. However, I do not recommend him.

3.0
4.0
PHIL482
Oct 31, 2011

I expected this class to be a challenge, There is no textbook, as he is in the process of writing one himself, but the text really doesn't help all that much with tests and labs so be prepared to do extra research if you really want to understand what he's talking about. Slow to respond to emails, and even then, not very helpful or clear.

2.0
5.0
PHIL170
Oct 31, 2011

miserable experience. 1st day, he showed a bunch of depressing facts and figures. the material was super hard to grasp. and he has this super complicated and confusing way of assigning homewotk

1.0
5.0
PHIL170
Nov 28, 2011

He's such a bad teacher. His grading is psychotic to say the least and his study guides might as well be in arabic because you can't understand it and it won't help you on the test either. Words of wisdom, if you're smart....Don't take this class.

4.0
3.0
PHIL170
Nov 28, 2011

Hated this class at first. Lectures were boring, couldn't understand his teaching method. Eventually, I realized he actually cared about his students' educations. Gave us extra credit to boost our grades, made sure we understood material. Overall, good teacher. Learned a lot, class became my favorite and now I really enjoy logic. MUST STUDY!

5.0
1.0
PHIL170
Dec 12, 2011

He's very funny and interesting! He can be negative at times, but he keeps class fun. The homework is easy and he gives a lot of extra credit. No need for the book but it's veryyyy helpful! I recommend him he's very nice but at times cynical. Easiest class in college so far.

4.0
3.0
PHIL170
Dec 18, 2011

Mr. Wallis knows a lot about politics and at times funny. Boring lectures but he happily answers questions if you don't understand the material. Sign-in sheets for attendance. Three tests and a final. He provides extra credit, which boosts your test scores. He informed the class when the trustees raised our tuition fees, showing he actually cares.

2.0
4.0
PHIL170
Dec 26, 2011

Very hard class. His teaching methods are extremely abstract. If you want to pass this class you must have the book! He has weird themed powerpoints, gives online extra-credit reviews before exams(2 pts). Difficult material. Examples in textbook are helpful but are not like exams. Boring lectures. Goes off topic. I don't recommend taking him.

3.0
4.0
PHIL170
May 20, 2012

Too hard for a G.E. class, you can really find a better professor. Dear god, this was the first class I actually had to study for. II hated it. He is hilarious and has a dark sense of humor, but even that can't save you from how boring his lectures are.

2.0
3.0
PHIL170
Dec 8, 2012

This is a difficult critical thinking course in my opinion. The material is not hard, but the way it is presented in class can make it extremely confusing. This instructor has a dark sense of humor which is a plus but overall the lectures can be very boring. I would not recommend taking this class with this instructor.

2.0
3.0
PHIL170
Jan 18, 2013

His lectures are very boring, but he has a nice sense of humor. Tests are easy if you study. All material is online. His teaching is very hard to follow, so I ended up teaching myself from the book and slides. Wouldn't recommend.

5.0
1.0
PHIL170
Jan 18, 2013

Professor Wallis doesn't only prepare you for critical thinking, he prepares you for life. Every lesson I learned in the class has proven useful. The class can be a little boring at times, but he's willing to lighten the mood and is pretty funny. Go to his office hours and do the extra credit. Textbook is not needed at all to secure an A.Take HIM!

4.0
3.0
PHIL170
Jan 22, 2013

He's a really nice and helpful guy. Gives you A LOT of extra credit and if you don't do it, that's on you. He's pretty easy, you just have to study it. I slacked off the entire semester and did most of the extra credit. He had review sessions for the final test and I ended up going from a Fail to a C! He has a sense of humor, so that helps.

1.0
5.0
PHIL170
Oct 26, 2013

EXTREMELY monotone, his lectures are the worst I've ever experienced. If you ask a question he runs off on a tangent, for the love of god, take another professor.

1.0
5.0
PHIL170
Dec 24, 2013

He was disorganized, lectures were not helpful, would give homework assignments before he truly lectured on the material,and grading on homework assignments was random. I recommend taking anyone else for this class.

5.0
2.0
PHIL170
May 20, 2014

I thought he was really easy! I enjoyed going to class. He made it fun and yes he would get off topic but he would help you with every little problem you had and he would do study sessions before each exams, which helps. I would recommend him!!! He made everything easy to understand and its also a good idea to read the book.

4.0
3.0
PHIL170
Apr 16, 2015

His lectures are INCREDIBLY long and boring. He is very helpful and has extra (optional) classes to review before tests and also gives out practice tests for extra credit that are almost identical to the test. It is pretty easy to pass this class but it is awfully boring to sit through his lectures. I would recommend this class for an easy pass.

3.0
4.0
PHIL170
May 12, 2015

Content of class is hard. He's very helpful and will go out of his way to help you understand. Lectures can be kind of boring, but I personally just didn't like philosophy in general. He makes some funny jokes

2.0
3.0
PHIL170
May 13, 2015

Not clear with assignments and lectures. Does not use Beachboard which sucks. Randomly takes attendance for credit so class is mandatory but super boring!! If there is another teacher available I would recommend taking them especially if you don't want to put much effort in the class.

5.0
4.0
170
May 20, 2015

Don't get me wrong, I'll tell you right off the bat that this glass is tough. Philosophy in general is a tough class. I loved Wallis though. He's kind of a dry sarcastic guy, but he cares. If you go to the reviews before test and ASK for help, you will pass. I can genuinely say I learned a lot.

3.0
4.0
PHIL170
May 26, 2015

Took Wallis for the Spring 2015 semester and lost interest on the way. Wallis himself is a very cool and funny guy. Isn't a grump or mean but the class and the lectures were very boring. He has his own website that has all of his work, lecture slides, calendar and schedule but you're still going to need to put in a lot of effort and OT to pass.

3.0
5.0
PHIL170
Jun 23, 2015

Wallis is a very funny man and you will find yourself laughing a lot in his class if you can manage to stay awake. He has a monotone voice which makes it hard for people to focus. If you pay attention you should pass because the books aren't much help. For the first half of class we used a textbook that he wrote. Takes random attendance for points.

5.0
2.0
PHI170
Sep 27, 2015

His class is not a tough class to pass but definitely challenges your thoughts on philosophy. He challenges us as students while keeping the lectures light and humorous.

2.0
5.0
PHILOSOPHY170
Oct 7, 2015

He's very unclear in his lectures. I feel like he talks in circles, never really answering the questions we have. I hardly understand his lectures versus the textbook reading we're assigned. I thought I did everything right and I still did badly...

2.0
4.0
PHIL170
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 19, 2015

Not a very good teacher. He talks for a long time, but it does not relate to his tests. I used the book to help me with the tests because the lecture notes does not correlate with the questions.

3.0
4.0
PHIL170
Grade: B+
Dec 1, 2015

Pretty boring class. Definitely have to do a lot of reading and studying if you want to pass. The tests are very relaxed. If you actually study and read the textbook, you'll get a good grade. He's a funny and cool guy which is good.

3.0
3.0
PHI170
Grade: A+
Jan 18, 2016

Honestly the first couple days of class I was very lost. He has power points that are very complicated. No bullet points, just a lot of paragraphs. He does have extra credit online so DO IT! He also has reviews which are super helpful so GO TO THEM. He gives homework but it's not much. I honestly thought I was going to fail his class but got an A.

4.0
4.0
PHI170
Grade: A
Nov 3, 2016
Would take again

Wallis is a great professor and goes out of his way to help students. Although philosophy in general may be challenging, Wallis provides many resources to study from (past exams, review sessions, EC practice)and his exams are based on the homework and lectures. His lectures may seem all over the place at first, but they're easy to get used to.

Gives good feedback
Clear grading criteria
Caring
4.0
2.0
PHI170
Grade: A-
Nov 30, 2016
Wouldn't take again

1st couple classes seem horrible but don't worry. Takes time to learn his teaching style&go2 to class to get the material -dont try to learn on your own,attendance is all it takes. He's gone through a lot in his past&even so he's a very humble,caring professor w/a unique but hilarious sense of humor. Hands down 1 of my favorite instructors ever.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Inspirational
Caring
4.0
4.0
PHI170
Grade: C-
May 19, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Wallis is so funny and passionate! This class can be an easy A, but you better do all the homework/extra credit/study really hard for the NINE tests!

Gives good feedback
Clear grading criteria
EXTRA CREDIT
3.0
2.0
PHIL100
Grade: A+
Feb 3, 2018
Would take again

he gives you a study guide for all (3) exams; i got As on all of them. homework is harder than the tests - pay attention to his lecture slides and youll definitely pass the class bonus: he gives out SO much extra credit... it boosted my solid B to a solid A also, no textbook required! reading off of his slides is good enough

Skip class? You won't pass.
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
EXTRA CREDIT
2.0
3.0
PHIL100
Grade: B
Feb 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He's quite annoying, but can occasionally be funny. His lectures are insanely boring and you can probably learn it all on your own through the links and readings he posts online, but he does attendance spot checks that are worth points, so show up to get attendance points. Wasn't the worst class, but wasnt good either.

Clear grading criteria
EXTRA CREDIT
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
PHI170
Grade: C+
Apr 23, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Horrible teacher, nice guy. but avoid taking him at all costs, super boring and old school guy in the most out dated classroom at CSULB, feel like he is talking in circles, does not use beach board so not clear on when assignments are due, so many assignments and tests, DO NOT take him unless you really like critical thinking, but he is not good

Tough Grader
Participation matters
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
4.0
3.0
PHI170
Grade: B+
May 19, 2018
Would take again

There are 7 test that are worth 70% of your grade. The first two are only worth 5% total and the 3rd is worth 9%, so the more important ones are tests 4-7 which are 14% each. Attendance is 10% and HW is 20%. He gives out tons of extra credit, do them all. Just study for the tests, go to class, go to his review sessions, do Hw, and do all extra cred

2.0
3.0
PHI170
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

One of the most boring Class yet to be taken. He gives out a lot of homework and THERE ARE 7 TESTS That are 70% of your grade. 10% attendance and the 20% is the homework. He explains everything in class but if you miss something you will never be able to cover it up. ALSO HE IS NEVER ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE THE CLASS. In short don't take him.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
SO MANY PAPERS
4.0
3.0
PHIL170
Grade: A
May 20, 2019
Wouldn't take again

7 exams, 15 homework assignments, and 10 random attendance checks. His practice exams look exactly like his actual exams and he gives a lot of extra credit. His lectures are boring but he's caring and understanding.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Test heavy
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
PHIL100
Grade: Not sure yet
Aug 5, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Dont take his online class. He procrastinates on posting the work you need to get done for the week, giving you less time to complete it. I nearly fall asleep during his lecture videos. Hes one of those profs to make an easy GE class absolutely miserable. Dont take him.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
1.0
3.0
PHIL170
Aug 30, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Absolutely the most bland professor I've ever had. His lectures literally sound like he is mumbling and he goes on and on and on and on without a recap and makes things more difficult than they really are. BUY THE BOOK because he is terrible at explaining reasons and gives way too many online quizzes for literally anyone to care.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
PHI170
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Sep 6, 2019
Wouldn't take again

I only had him for a week and I was completely lost. He rambles on and on about I don't even know what. Drop his class if you can.

3.0
4.0
PHIL483
Grade: Incomplete
Nov 9, 2019
Would take again

Wallis is a good professor. He clearly knows what he's talking about, but he has very high standards for his undergrads and the entire class is based on his own textbook. There isn't much room for any lenience. He does care about his students and offers some extra credit that slightly helps out. He's all right.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
2.0
2.0
PHI170
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 16, 2019
Would take again

Very boring and unclear lectures although he does try his best for people to understand. Just buy the book and study and you should be good.

5.0
3.0
PHIL483
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 5, 2019
Would take again

Wallis is an expert on cognitive science and the philosophy of mind and is an excellent resource and an interesting lecturer. However, this was the cause of an issue. Put simply, his work is too advanced for a semester class for undergrads. The writings are stellar but challenging. Overall, expect to pass, don't expect to become an expert yourself.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
EXTRA CREDIT
1.0
5.0
PHI170
Grade: F
Dec 22, 2019
Wouldn't take again

This was the WORST class I have taken in my life. I never fail my classes but this class was the most difficult, unnecessary, and outrageously terrible EVER His lectures are excessively boring with his confusing slides in COMIC SANS and too much text and Of course he gives extra credit but it wont help you if you dont do well in your tests.

EXTRA CREDIT
Tough grader
3.0
4.0
PHI170
Grade: A
Jan 20, 2020
Wouldn't take again

GREAT person, awful professor :( If you want to do well in this class, find a study group and teach each other the content because whether you listen to his lectures or not, you're going to have to teach yourself at the end of the day anyways. He offers a lot of extra credit and study sessions so take advantage of that. Attendance is taken randomly

Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
EXTRA CREDIT
4.0
5.0
PHIL170
Feb 12, 2020
Wouldn't take again

He's very intelligent! So much so his readings are hard to understand. Interesting lectures, but in order to really understand the material you must pay attention in class. There are quizzes every week on the chapters you should have read the week before, to save you time from reading 50+ page chapters go to lecture and pay attention!

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
PHIL170
Grade: A
Mar 3, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I truly hated this class. Wallis is intelligent (very rude during office hours) but unable to clearly explain the material. He talks in circles and the lectures are extremely hard to decipher. I taught myself by the book and online videos and was frustrated I paid for a class I had to teach myself. Avoid this professor at all costs.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
PHIL170
Grade: D-
Apr 7, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Absolutely the worst professor/instructor I have ever had. Rude in office hours, disorganized, unclear, impatient. Obviously very knowledgable about philosophy but literally has no teaching abilities. Pessimistic, doesn't even encourage trying to enjoy his class. Do not take a class with him.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Tough grader
4.0
2.0
PHI170
Grade: A
Apr 15, 2020
Wouldn't take again

The lectures were very heavy in information and sometimes monotonous. Although the textbook was not required, it became very helpful in understanding the content of the lectures. Wallis randomly takes attendance throughout the semester. He gives a lot of resources and offers a lot of help to do the exams. He posts previous tests which helped a lot.

Accessible outside class
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
4.0
4.0
PHI170
Apr 22, 2020
Would take again

Professor Wallis is super chill but the material of his class is very difficult to understand. I think I'm the only one who thought he was funny, but he makes good jokes from time to time. His lectures are kinda boring still. Lots of extra credit opportunity and not a lot of homework/exams. Do the homework or you will not pass. No midterm or final.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Caring
EXTRA CREDIT
1.0
4.0
PHIL482
Grade: A
May 13, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Stay FAR AWAY from this prof. Ridiculously unorganized, rude, inconsiderate & EXTREMELY BORING!! lectures are incredibly over complex for no reason at all! Makes you reference his own written stuff but it's information heavy and difficult to understand. SO MANY ASSIGNMENTS. google taught me more than him! He's the worst prof. I've EVER encountered!

Lecture heavy
So many papers
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
PHIL170
Oct 16, 2020
Wouldn't take again

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. Please do yourself a favor and don't take this god awful class. Especially his online class because it is such a waste of time and energy. All you will be doing in this class is read these long, boring documents he made and do homework and quizzes. He doesn't even offer Zoom lectures for some reason so you teach yourself.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
4.0
4.0
PHIL170
Grade: A
Oct 24, 2020
Would take again

You can genuinely tell Dr. Wallis loves to teach. He's extremely caring and understanding and will try his best to help you succeed/pass! There's a lot of extra credit for this class so take advantage of it, but you HAVE to read and watch through his video lectures. Don't take this class if you're not willing to work for your grade.

Get ready to read
Caring
EXTRA CREDIT
4.0
4.0
PHI170
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 16, 2020
Would take again

Don't take if you're not willing to work for it. The professor himself is amazing, the concept itself is hard. I'd say focus more on lectures rather than reading. If he makes any mistakes just email him. Super understanding and cares for his student. Check for mistakes in test just in case,he's dyslexic so he may be mistaken. Down to earth!Take EC!

Caring
EXTRA CREDIT
Lecture heavy
3.0
2.0
PHI170
Grade: A
Jan 10, 2021
Would take again

This class is fairly easy. As long as you read his online textbook (provided as a PDF by chapter) and occasionally the actual textbook, the homework and quizzes are really easy. It does get progressively more difficult, but it is still extremely manageable. He had a schedule of when everything would be due from the very beginning, which I liked.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
EXTRA CREDIT
2.0
4.0
PHIL160
Grade: Not sure yet
Jul 29, 2021
Wouldn't take again

The material itself is not exactly difficult but the way he explains them feels like he is making it harder than it actually is. Overall pretty standard online course but be prepared to work more than expected, especially if you have never taken a philosophy class before.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
EXTRA CREDIT
4.0
3.0
PHIL170
Grade: A
Dec 22, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I have nothing against Mr. Wallis, I just prefer in person classes so the format was what I struggled with the most. None of the classes are mandatory and the whole course is basically asynchronous. He is always available during office hours though! I would suggest to take advantage of the extra credit assignments, and manage your time accordingly!

Gives good feedback
Clear grading criteria
EXTRA CREDIT
1.0
4.0
PHI170
Grade: D
Dec 26, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I absolutely hated this class. It definitely felt like a foreign language that was just unspeakable. The prof uses his own textbook so if you get it you get it, if you don't you don't. All the homework was quiz formatted and every single assignment was worth 3 points. The lecture videos and example problems were nothing like the actual exams.

Lots of homework
Test heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
PHI170
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 26, 2022

Wow. He clearly knows his stuff. Lectures are confusing. Straightforward philosophy concepts will have you confused and feeling helpless. I ultimately gave up on attending his lectures and deciphered the material myself. Lots of extra credit which was helpful. Avoid him. He truly should not be teaching undergrads or maybe anybody.

Tough grader
Lots of homework
Test heavy
2.0
4.0
PHIL170
Grade: C+
May 12, 2022

He teaches from his own self written text book. So he is fluent in this language that he created and only he understands majority of the time. Good luck keeping up. The lectures and literature are very dense. Class is boring, no activity at all. Show up and sit and watch him read from a power point. Cool guy, awful class. Save yourself

Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
PHIL482
Grade: A
May 20, 2022

Really smart guy, extremely helpful. Problem is, he can be very dry. He lectures like the teacher from Ferris Bueller. Since his lectures can be found online, class attendance is abysmal. He's a fair grader but expects a legitimate university level student to take his course. Tons of reading but if you're savvy, you can bypass most of it.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
Respected
1.0
5.0
PHI170
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 11, 2022

Talks in a manner that is beyond himself. Can barely understand him because he tries too hard to sound smart. The worst part is that he writes all the material himself. The material wouldn't be hard but can't understand any of the test questions, homework, readings etc. Makes test only available on Saturday too. Absolute worst teacher ever.

1.0
5.0
PHI170
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Nov 2, 2022

Terrible teacher, writes his own material and requires students to use it. Tests are 70% of your grade. Requires you to read 30+ pages weekly of his own material

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
PHIL170
Grade: Rather not say
Nov 6, 2022

Awful teacher. Writes his own material which basically only makes sense to him. Tries to force way to many big words in his tests/material, not even sure its grammatically correct anymore. The class average on the last two tests was 60% and like 50 something. Supposed to be a lower level PHIL class. Complete waste of time and money.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
170
Grade: C
Dec 7, 2022

The professor is cool but incredibly difficult. 70% of your grade depends on 7 tests which are incredibly difficult. Texts are dense and often filled with examples that go on for 1-3 pages while providing nothing. He writes his own textbooks and they are written in a manner that makes them hard to understand. Do not take it if you don't need to.

Tough grader
Test heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
PHIL170
Grade: C
Dec 15, 2022

do not take this professor you will regret it. he makes no sense in his lectures at all and confuses the heck out of everyone by making the material so much harder than it is. tests are so hard. dont even bother asking questions either cause his answer will confuse you more. dont take his class. you have been warned.

4.0
5.0
170
Grade: B-
Dec 20, 2022

lectures are hard to follow. Very long weekly reading assignments. 15 homework assignments,7 tests,14 extra credit opportunities, and 5 participation. The content for most tests was hard to grasp, but he does well at giving extra credit and additional support individually. He will also work with your situation. very kind, understanding person.

Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
Clear grading criteria
3.0
4.0
PHI170
Grade: A
Dec 21, 2022
Would take again

This class was kinda confusing ngl, cause he teaches from his own textbook and the reading and lectures were very tedious. However, during the zoom office hours I think that he did genuinely want his students to understand these topics and ask questions on them so he's not a bad professor.

Get ready to read
4.0
4.0
PHIL160
Grade: A
May 4, 2023
Would take again

The textbook wasn't really necessary I'm glad I never bought it. Very accessible during office hours. There are short 10-question weekly quizzes with optional extra credit, one short midterm paper answering prompt questions, and a final with the same structure as the midterm. The quizzes have very very dense jargon so take your time.

EXTRA CREDIT
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
2.0
4.0
170
Grade: B+
May 8, 2023

This class was all online no zoom (unless you had questions). You just keep taking quizzes and homework that are all multiple choices. All lectures were on videos, so just work at your own pace. Overall wasn't a helpful or engaging teacher and I do recommend to switch teachers.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
3.0
2.0
PHI170
Grade: B+
May 10, 2023
Would take again

Quiz every week and sometimes more than 1. There were literally so many extra credit quizzes tho. Really helped in the end. He wasn't hard tho in the end

EXTRA CREDIT
Test heavy
3.0
2.0
PHIL160
Grade: B+
Aug 31, 2023
Would take again

Not bad lectures can be sometimes boring overall easy class. Quizzes every week

Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
PHI170
Grade: B
Dec 2, 2023

Online lectures are all over the place and hard to follow most of the time. He uses weirs characters in his lectures that make no sense and make it more difficult to follow. Not very helpful, would recommend a different teacher 100%.

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
2.0
4.0
PHI170
Grade: B-
Nov 8, 2024

The lectures were all over the place and hard to follow. The professor's own textbook and teaching style made the class very confusing. However, the extra credit quizzes helped towards the end. unstuckstudy was a lifesaver for study prep.

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

59%

Textbook Required

79%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

95% confidence
Based on 33 grades
Most common grades:
A (12)
Not sure yet (9)
B+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(4)C(5)D(4)F(1)A-/B+(6)
Based on 46 reported grades
A: 12
Not sure yet: 9
B+: 5
A+: 3
Common Tags
Lecture heavy (18)
Get ready to read (17)
EXTRA CREDIT (16)
Test heavy (10)
Tough grader (9)
Skip class? You won't pass. (7)
Clear grading criteria (6)
Lots of homework (6)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.48 avg change
Nov
Dec
May
Aug
Dec
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

COGSCI

5.0

(1)

PHIL483

4.0

(2)

PHILOSOPHY

3.5

(2)

PHIL160

3.0

(47)

170

3.0

(4)
+11 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHILPHIL

5.0

PHILOSOPHY170

5.0

PHIL382

4.8

170

4.5

PHIL101

4.0

Similar Professors