3.4

Che Tat Ng

Mathematics - University of Waterloo

3.4
Quality
2.8
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
87
Reviews
3.4
Quality
2.8
Difficulty
3.4
Helpful
3.3
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

87

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

29

4

22

3

12

2

13

1

11

What Students Say

We miss you Che tat ng :( You're the best 3

MATH245 - 5.0 rating

Incredibly frustrating

MATH135 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B-

56% confidence
Based on 2 grades
Most common grades:
C (1)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(0)B(1)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 2 reported grades
C: 1
B: 1
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.42 avg change
Dec
Apr
Nov
Mar
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PMATH346

5.0

(2)

MATH35235

5.0

(1)

PMATH367

5.0

(1)

MATH245

4.3

(9)

MATH146

4.2

(6)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PMATH334

4.0

PM346

4.0

MATH35235

4.0

PMATH336

4.0

MATH136

3.6

Reviews (87)
2.0
3.0
MATH137
Jun 18, 2001

dont want him again

1.0
4.0
MATH135
Grade: C
Jun 18, 2001

Incredibly frustrating....only take his course if you feel like being tortured.

2.0
5.0
MATH136
Jun 19, 2001

My last name is "NG" (pronounce "mmm...") not "ING", "NG".

1.0
4.0
MATH137
Jun 26, 2001

No Comments

1.0
5.0
MATH137
Jun 26, 2001

Nothing to say, better find another prof to fit ur timetable

2.0
3.0
MATH136
Jun 26, 2001

C.T. Ng, C.T. Ng, Who knows what the XXXX he's saying!

4.0
3.0
MATH137
Jun 27, 2001

I think you guys are being harsh. I found him understandable, fair, friendly. B-

5.0
4.0
MATH136
Grade: B
Jul 5, 2001

Helpfull and rather good, just pay attention

1.0
3.0
MATH137
Jul 5, 2001

One of the worse profs ever

5.0
4.0
MATH146
Jul 19, 2001

Great sense of humour. Clear and easy to understand. Emphasizes key points.

3.0
3.0
MATH136
Jul 25, 2001

Knows his stuff. Just can't teach it

1.0
5.0
MATH136
Jul 31, 2001

He will tell you the same thing over and over and over and over and over again.

1.0
5.0
MATH136
Aug 3, 2001

He spends the whole time on one example without finishing it! He is the WORST!

4.0
3.0
MATH136
Sep 10, 2001

Stressed hard points, good sense of humor. Overall, he was pretty decent.

4.0
4.0
PMATH334
Sep 14, 2001

Good clear prof. Covered a lot of interesting material.

4.0
3.0
MATH135
Sep 16, 2001

No Comments

4.0
5.0
MATH136
Sep 23, 2001

Puts his heart into teaching, but I couldn't learn from him. Too smart/own good.

4.0
4.0
MATH136
Oct 19, 2001

Hilarious to listen to..."this animal" truly great to get help 1 on 1 from.

1.0
3.0
MATH137
Oct 26, 2001

No Comments

4.0
2.0
MATH136
Oct 27, 2001

Funny guy, quite clear on explanations

4.0
2.0
MATH138
Nov 1, 2001

No Comments

5.0
1.0
MATH235
Dec 9, 2001

Bunch of n00bs, CT owns you all.

4.0
1.0
MATH235
Dec 9, 2001

you animo !!!!

3.0
3.0
PM334
Feb 9, 2002

Very good prof. But too much of a language barrier. I could not understand him.

5.0
3.0
PM334
Mar 2, 2002

1st yr alg. might be hard for some of u guys, but cant alwys blame the prof

3.0
3.0
CALC1
Apr 20, 2002

No Comments

5.0
1.0
MATH235
May 9, 2002

The best prof in my entire life. Humorous,Clear explains math in the proper way

2.0
4.0
MATH235
Jun 8, 2002

hardly ever turned around to see the class

5.0
1.0
MATH136
Aug 30, 2002

COOL PROF. Writes Chinese words on the board if he doesn't understand you

4.0
4.0
MATH135
Oct 2, 2002

Good prof; always smiles

5.0
3.0
MATH135
Oct 24, 2002

a nice guy,always smiles,everything is understandable despite theFactHeHasAccent

4.0
3.0
MATH245
Nov 11, 2002

very well explained, v.good prof

3.0
1.0
PM352
Nov 15, 2002

his I'm just a simple Pole in a complex plane joke is still a favourite

5.0
2.0
MATH135
Nov 22, 2002

Greatest math prof! Easy to follow,CARES,always smiles. Made an 8:30 class fun!

2.0
4.0
MATH235
Nov 28, 2002

No Comments

5.0
2.0
MATH135
Dec 6, 2002

teaches slowly and clearly. makes algebra first year a little easier.

3.0
3.0
MATH135
Dec 18, 2002

meh, he was ok...liked to compare cats and dogs....

4.0
2.0
MATH135
Dec 18, 2002

No Comments

4.0
3.0
MATH245
Dec 19, 2002

always smiling, explains things slowly and clearly

5.0
3.0
MATH135
Dec 29, 2002

very clear, goes slowly, explains difficult parts, likes animals

2.0
2.0
MATH135
Jan 2, 2003

VERY thick accent. Didn't get much out of his lectures. fuuny though

4.0
3.0
MATH135
Jan 5, 2003

Enjoys his job, likes to help, likes to smile

5.0
3.0
PMATH346
Jan 26, 2003

Crystal Clear, Extremely Helpful, Sophisticated sence of humour. EXCELLENT!!!

5.0
3.0
PMATH346
Feb 25, 2003

GOD I totally agree with you....

4.0
3.0
MATH135
Mar 2, 2003

Goes slow, sometimes difficult to understand

5.0
3.0
MATH135
Mar 11, 2003

he made me love algebra!!

5.0
3.0
MATH245
Mar 30, 2003

Among the best algebra profs at UW. Has a keen interest in his subject.

4.0
4.0
PM346
Apr 15, 2003

Real smart. Explain stuff well. Much theory but few examples. Takes a lot of intellectual gut to enjoy his lectures

3.0
3.0
MATH135
May 4, 2003

No Comments

2.0
3.0
ALGEBRA2
Aug 21, 2003

Probably one of the worst profs ever....

5.0
3.0
MATH235
Dec 16, 2003

Great prof. Good pace, sometimes a bit slow. Makes everything very clear. Smiles alot. He wants you to learn.

5.0
3.0
PMATH352
Feb 12, 2004

Love this guy! Good lecturer, also patient to explain while consulted in person. Always laid back, super smart, can be funny when he wants to.

5.0
2.0
MATH235
Apr 3, 2004

Great prof! Loves algebra and makes you want to do well. Can be very funny!

5.0
3.0
MATH235
Apr 28, 2004

This guy is kind, patient and smart. He doesn't have any fixed office hours, you can basically go in at any time, and he'll explain your questions for like 1 hour and still doesn't show even a slight sigh of impatience, great person.

5.0
4.0
MATH35235
May 4, 2004

Great teacher... you will think he's going too slow, but he's still actually ahead of other classes... explains VERY well...

5.0
2.0
MATH235
Jun 8, 2004

This guy teaches WITHOUT notes!!! He does not need notes to look at and makes perfect examples on the spot!!!

1.0
2.0
PMATH
Jul 24, 2004

he's s-o s----l-------o--------w.... if you're planning to learn math, don't take his course, he won't even be able to get to one tenth of the material he's supposed to get through, I wonder if he actually knows the stuff or not

1.0
2.0
PMATH
Jul 24, 2004

One of the worst profs I've ever had.

3.0
1.0
MATH245
Nov 2, 2004

Ng is fairly nice and helpful, and he explains thing clearly. However, DO NOT take him for an advanced class or any higher level pure math course. He goes way too slowly - he won't cover most of the material, and if you are at all interested in math, the lectures will be excruciatingly boring.

5.0
1.0
MATH245
Feb 5, 2005

Very nice prof, and great teacher. He seems to be teaching slowly, and people complain, yet the same people don't get half the concepts correctly. His pace is perfect for the avg of the class (and advanced level class), and when he seems to be going "slow" it means you have to pay closer attention

4.0
3.0
MATH138
Feb 22, 2005

Class was easy as I got perfect. Haha.

3.0
3.0
MATH135
Feb 28, 2005

No Comments

4.0
2.0
MATH245
Apr 23, 2005

Very clear explanations during lectures and a very nice person to talk to in his office. His assignments did not seem to be 100% related to lecture material (this may have something to do with the style of the textbook, too).

4.0
3.0
MATH245
Nov 14, 2005

Great prof, knows his stuff. Explains mathematics in a really interesting way

5.0
1.0
MATH245
Dec 31, 2006

Interesting class. Lectures were simple and assignments seemed simplistic enough (an easy marker helped here though). Exam seemed really difficult so keep sharp. P.S. Study True and False questions THOROUGHLY.

1.0
5.0
MATH235
Feb 6, 2007

terrible English, the Mid-term does not match any assignments and textbook. Horrible hand writing!!!

5.0
2.0
MATH235
Feb 14, 2007

His lectures are as good as MATH 235 can get. His English could be a lot worse - 2nd year students have heard nothing yet! Shows a good # of examples whereas profs in other sections HATE examples. You must come to class or you will miss on a lot of exam material. Textbook is a supplement, not a replacement for attending class.

2.0
5.0
MATH235
Apr 14, 2007

Very unorganized teacher and poor communicator. Will not help you prepare for your finals/midterms and assignments are nothing like the text. Pretty much teaches his version of lin algebra and stays away from the book. I did however attend every class and would fall asleep from lack of understanding

5.0
2.0
PMATH367
Jun 5, 2007

Very reasonable, and exceptionally helpful outside class; didn't have any interest in topology until his class; takes care of concepts in class and leaves details for assignment; highly recommended; he does not entertain elitists -- but there is no loss -- they can just take a nap;

2.0
2.0
PMATH352
Dec 7, 2007

Does not post assignment solutions, does not give final exam information sheet. Very slow teaching style in class (ie takes 10+ mins to write down the statement of one theorem). Very unclear as to what is coverable, making it hard to study for exams.

2.0
2.0
PMATH352
Jan 12, 2008

Spends 20 minutes describing what "with respect to" means without explaining the actual theorems. Doesn't post assignment solutions. Lecture notes were pretty much useless.

3.0
4.0
PMATH336
Mar 15, 2008

Gives rediculously hard midterms.

3.0
2.0
PMATH352
May 22, 2008

Unclear and vague in explanations. I took the course and learnt nothing - he basically ruined pure math for me. Guys like him should stick to research, or teach courses like first year algebra/calculus, which aren't easy to screw up.

3.0
1.0
PMATH352
Jun 21, 2008

Avoid at all costs!!!

2.0
1.0
PMATH352
Jan 10, 2009

Lectures were just statements of definitions and theorems - only about half the theorems covered had proofs. Exam was brutal as expected of Ng. Covered material not covered by assignments.Overall; Avoid A group of us didn't take this course the first time around because Ng was the teacher - didn't matter he taught it the second time as well :(

4.0
2.0
PMATH352
Feb 10, 2009

I took two classes with C.T. Ng and enjoyed both of them :) He's perfect for those who can learn independently. His lectures solidify textbook understanding, his assignments don't take long to do, and you can get help anytime (AND proofs are optional)! But if you rely on a prof to teach you everything, then he's probably not for you...

1.0
5.0
MATH136
Dec 26, 2009

Do you want do assn BEFORE you learn the knowledge in class? Do you want to feel good in exam, but lose a lot of mark for detail when you see the mark? Do you want to know how to do a question but prof tells you "you guys all know why"? Ng's class will train your self study ability. Believe me he won't teach you anything useful.

5.0
2.0
MATH136
Jan 4, 2010

Awesome

4.0
3.0
MATH146
Apr 15, 2010

He was incredibly clear, but he taught at a painfully slow pace. We could have accomplished far more in 12 weeks than we actually did. Also, his assignments were very, very easy and hardly prepared us for the somewhat challenging midterm and final exams. I don't see the point in giving assignments if they're not going to teach us anything.

2.0
3.0
MATH235
Dec 10, 2010

His notes were next to useless. He hardly gave any examples to help you. He was SO SO painfully slow at teaching and he missed chunks of the material. Also we usually hadn't learned the stuff we needed to know for each assignment. Also the grading on midterms was outrageous, you lose points for everything, even if the answer is correct.

3.0
3.0
PMATH340
Apr 23, 2011

Teaches painfully slow. Only does super easy and trivial examples in class and then wonders why people can't figure out how to do harder stuff on the homework and tests. Final exam was very odd and ignored large parts of the course. Course never really "came together," the progression didn't flow very well at all.

5.0
1.0
MATH146
Nov 5, 2011

extremely friendly and helpful prof, cares a lot about his students, knows the materials inside out,convey concepts crystal clear. absolutely my favorite prof in UW!

5.0
5.0
MATH146
Nov 23, 2011

He is super patient and kind with students. He is extremely knowledgeable of the subject. However, his lectures are way to slow and he tends to wander off, spending time on obvious points that everyone gets, yet omitting much harder problems which he would later put on his exams. He gives: grade school lectures, high school hw & grad school exams.

2.0
4.0
MATH146
Nov 28, 2011

Elementary-level lectures in an advanced math class. The guy really loves math and wants his students to succeed, but he just can't teach. Assignments were much too easy, course came straight from the text, exams assumed things that were never covered. I have no idea what these other raters were thinking. Definitely the worst prof I've had :(

4.0
2.0
MATH146
Mar 13, 2012

He never told us that we would be tested on the textbook notes and assignments were really easy exam was surprisingly hard

5.0
1.0
MATH235
Dec 29, 2013

Doing his best to help students get understood concepts clearly

5.0
1.0
MATH245
Jan 28, 2016

We miss you Che tat ng :( You're the best 3

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B-

56% confidence
Based on 2 grades
Most common grades:
C (1)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(0)B(1)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 2 reported grades
C: 1
B: 1
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.42 avg change
Dec
Apr
Nov
Mar
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PMATH346

5.0

(2)

MATH35235

5.0

(1)

PMATH367

5.0

(1)

MATH245

4.3

(9)

MATH146

4.2

(6)
+15 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PMATH334

4.0

PM346

4.0

MATH35235

4.0

PMATH336

4.0

MATH136

3.6

Similar Professors