3.7

Chuck Van Patten

Philosophy - Cosumnes River College

3.7
Quality
2.4
Difficulty
40%
Would Retake
137
Reviews
3.7
Quality
2.4
Difficulty
3.6
Helpful
3.9
Clarity

40%

Would Retake

137

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

57

4

38

3

18

2

15

1

9

What Students Say

He puts students down for asking questions

PHIL352 - 1.0 rating

If you aren't a Catholic, beware

PHI320 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

92%

Textbook Required

90%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

89% confidence
Based on 13 grades
Most common grades:
A (5)
B+ (3)
Not sure yet (2)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(2)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(3)
Based on 17 reported grades
A: 5
B+: 3
Not sure yet: 2
A+: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (2)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (1)
Participation matters (1)
Skip class? You won't pass. (1)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (1)
SO MANY PAPERS (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.18 avg change
Apr
Jun
May
Jul
Aug
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL9

5.0

(1)

PHILISOPHY

5.0

(1)

INTTOPHILOSOP

5.0

(1)

PHILOSOPHY300

5.0

(2)

PIL310352

5.0

(1)
+33 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL320

5.0

0000

5.0

COS126

4.0

PHI320

3.5

PHIL9

3.0

Reviews (137)
4.0
2.0
PHIL916
Feb 18, 2003

Iiiiinteresting. Gets lost if you question his lectures. He grows on you :)

5.0
3.0
PHIL9
Feb 19, 2003

Awesome Professor. Occasional long tangents. Enjoys debating with students.

4.0
1.0
WORLDREL
Mar 9, 2003

Has a sense of humour to keep the class awake with a very boring subject. Is easy if you read the texts. Tests come from the book. Lectures are just the reading reiterated. Just something to lecture about.

2.0
2.0
PHIL
Oct 31, 2003

Has the appearance of being learned, but really sits and complains about how stupid his studeants are. When you try to debate him, he shuts you down and will not answer any of your questions.

4.0
3.0
PHILOSOPHY
Dec 12, 2003

No Comments

2.0
3.0
WORLDRELI
Feb 11, 2004

this teacher sucks...doesnt teach...dont reccommend him to anyone...unless u want someone who forces his opinion on you

2.0
3.0
WLDRELIG
Oct 21, 2004

Very rude, makes you feel ignorant and uneducated. Can be very offensive to women, students, minorities, and people who's religion he dosent agree with. He thinks he know everthing about every religion and wont be told diffrently. If you have an openion dont take this class..

3.0
1.0
INTROTOPHIL
Nov 9, 2004

Funny as ever, although slightly abrasive, but you are in philosophy, so you should be able to handle the opinions of others and their way of communicating. If not, well, phil not for you. Easy to pass though, not difficult AT ALL.

5.0
2.0
PHIL300
Nov 16, 2004

He is a good teacher if you are willing to step out of your box. He can teach you wonderful things if you really listen and pay attention in class. The key is to read the text before you go to lecture. It makes the material easier to understand. Don't go into this class with a closed mind. Take Him!

4.0
3.0
WORLDRELIGIONS
Nov 28, 2004

Prof. Van Patten scares the hell out of me, but I'm glad I took his class! He has his opinions and expresses them very vehemently, but he is fair in his grading. I learned a lot in this class, especially about tribal religions. His site visits are some of the coolest projects I've done in school.

4.0
3.0
INTROTOBIBLE
Nov 28, 2004

He does go off on tangents but he KNOWS when he does it. His tests will only cover material that he's talked about in class. May seem kinda kooky but essentially a good guy and great teacher.

3.0
1.0
PHIL300
Jan 19, 2005

I took his class over the summer. I hardly read the book because everything on the exame is discussed in the class. He also gave a study guide of what will be on the test with test questions. He will also go over the study guide if you have questions. He is a bit boring but very easy!

4.0
3.0
PHIL300
Jan 28, 2005

He gives you the exam questions before the exam. It was an esay class , i didn't even read the book. But i passed with a B. There are 2 major essays.

5.0
2.0
WORLDRELIGION
Apr 15, 2005

Easy, clear, and awesome teacher. I loved the class and goes at a very slow pace so that the information really sinks in.

4.0
2.0
PHIL352
Apr 29, 2005

class was okay, the only thing bad was when he lectures, he stays on that one subject for LONGggg time, made me go sleep. other than that, this teacher is great.. tests are decent, essays dont need to be in good format and still get good grade on it, you have to visit two religious sites.

5.0
1.0
PHIL
Jun 7, 2005

great teacher. he's a bit boring but he's really nice don't really need to read the book. tests were easy since he gives you the questions before hand and if you take it in the summer school he lectures directly from the study guide that he gives. great class if you want to pass

5.0
2.0
WORLDRELIGIONS
Jul 1, 2005

Van Patten is a great teacher. I learned a lot in this class. He is very clear, and always answers questions. The site reports and the faith statement are fabulous educational experiences. The things I learned apply to so many other topic. Highly recommended for all students whatever your faith, lack of faith, or major.

5.0
1.0
PHILISOPHY
Jul 12, 2005

helpful and very intresting class.

2.0
2.0
WORLDRELIGION
Jul 13, 2005

No Comments

5.0
2.0
WORLDRELIGIONS
Jul 19, 2005

Great class and great teacher. Has his opinions but, tells you to make up your own mind. Class is the most interesting and knowledgable class I've had so far. Debunks the myths about certain religions and addresses social issues in religion. As an agnostic, I came out with a lot more respect for all faiths.

5.0
2.0
PHIL
Grade: A
Aug 24, 2005

Liked the class, was pretty funny at times. Always bashing the kings though.

5.0
1.0
INTTOPHILOSOP
Aug 24, 2005

i absolutely love Van Patten! most fun i ever had thinking! i want more more more!

5.0
1.0
PHILOSOPHY300
Aug 30, 2005

This guy is so funny. I always laugh at least twice when I'm in his class. Great teacher

5.0
3.0
WORLDRELIGION
Sep 15, 2005

dude is wierd, but funny. explains things well, talks about being naked a lot. fun class.

5.0
2.0
PHILOSOPHY
Sep 22, 2005

yea go van patten

5.0
2.0
PIL310352
Sep 27, 2005

No Comments

5.0
3.0
PHIL352
Oct 3, 2005

Chuck is a fantastic lecturer. While sometimes the lectures drone on, it's obvious that he's passionate about both the topic AND his students. He is constantly displaying his readiness to counsel and help his students outside of the classroom. His insights are eye-opening. I recommend taking a class with Chuck. If you want to debate him, make sure you have your facts straight.

5.0
2.0
WORLDRELIGIONS
Oct 5, 2005

Interesting class. You're always thinking "did he really just say that?!?" Very entertaining guy, but lots and lots and lots of reading. Lectures boring but very clear and easy to get. He prints out the notes ahead of time.

5.0
1.0
INTROTOPHILO
Oct 11, 2005

he is such a teddy bear. sometimes misspells, or goes in circles, but other than that great teach. wish we could argue more!!!

1.0
1.0
INTROTOBIBLE
Oct 17, 2005

I hated his class. Nice guy, though

5.0
2.0
BIBLE
Dec 4, 2005

Class is awesome. Teaches in circles, but still awesome.

5.0
3.0
PHILOSOPHY300
Dec 15, 2005

I loved this class! It was interesting, informative, and I firmly believe that after taking this class, I became a better student. Van Patten is a very nice guy, funny too. Throughout the semester he stressed that we should ask him for help if we needed it. He can occasionally get boring, but only occasionally. He loves what he teaches, its great.

3.0
2.0
WORLDRELIGIONS
Dec 21, 2005

Liked him and the class. Though he says he is open to other people's opinions and ideas, he really isn't. I never really talked in class, try arguing with him in class and you'll lose everytime. He'll say anything to win an argument and will ignore part of students arguments if he can't respond to it.

5.0
1.0
PHIL300
Jan 3, 2006

His class is easy and attendance is not a huge issue, you do learn a lot from him. He is intresting, at times it can be dull, but he likes what he teaches and he is good at it. He will stress that he is always available to talk if you need help with a paper (papers are super easy).

5.0
2.0
PHIL352WRELIG
Jan 12, 2006

Very nice guy and knows his stuff so pick his brain as often as possible. Three papers but fun to do and three tests (mult choice, t/f, and short answer which are pretty easy if you study. Gives out handy study guide to use for notes. I'm not sure why people think he's judgemental. I'm the worst kind of heathen but he was always kind.

5.0
1.0
PHIL310
Jan 19, 2006

You will learn a lot in this class. Van Patten is a fun and fair teacher. He tells some off the wall stories, but overall they tie into his lessons well.

4.0
2.0
PHIL356
Jan 30, 2006

Great teacher...Really informative...Funny, and have a genuine concern for students.

4.0
3.0
INTRO
Feb 2, 2006

van patten is halarious! he is misunderstood by many. people think he is being an ass when he's being sarcastic.

5.0
2.0
PHIL310
Mar 24, 2006

one of the best professors i've ever had. he's very intelligent and funny. he's makes all of his lectures very interesting with his stories

3.0
3.0
PHIL352
Mar 27, 2006

I think the other ratings were written by VanPatten or his assistant. VanPatten is the type of teacher that goes by what the books say and knows of nothing else. You will lose points for not being in class, and you probabily won't be since he is boring. His tests are very hard if you don't study (no notes allowed). And he is not a funny teacher.

5.0
1.0
ETHICS
May 5, 2006

No Comments

5.0
4.0
PHIL356
May 9, 2006

His class was one of the best classes I ever took. He is very informative and he enjoys his job which is very clear. If you disagree with him he will argue until you see his way, but he is somewhat openminded. His class is easy if you go to class and listen. You dont even need to study for the tests.

4.0
1.0
PHIL352
May 10, 2006

really easy class if you take good notes and read chapters in the book. argue with him and you will lose, not open to be wrong, goes by the book, he is nice though and always asks if u need help, just on't try arguing with him

4.0
1.0
PHIL352
May 22, 2006

Easy teacher, easy A. You can fail all the tests and still get an A (do EC). This teacher is rude and not very open minded. Having been raised in the Muslim religion, he had told me I am wrong. Don't argue with him he has been brain washed to believe he is right. What you learn in this class is 70% BS. The book by Young is also BS.

5.0
2.0
INTROTOPHILO
Jun 5, 2006

awesome teacher. very knowledgable on his subject. very helpfull. be sure and know your facts before arguing with him.

1.0
3.0
PHIL300
Jul 4, 2006

No Comments

5.0
2.0
PHIL300352
Jul 6, 2006

I took his philosophy and world religions classes over the summer and it was a great learning experience. This is the first time i have ever taken college coarses and i hope it is going to be like this for the rest of my college career. His class is easy and manageable. Gives out handy study guides way before the test days. Easy A. TAKE HIM!

4.0
2.0
PHIL352
Aug 22, 2006

prof vanpatten is awesome. he made the class fun. i took world religion with him over the summer and he made being cooped up in a classroom in the summertime fun. i signed up for his phil 300 class and was so bummed to find out ont he first day he couldnt teach it this semester due to a car accident.

1.0
5.0
PHIL352
Nov 6, 2006

he is sooooo boring. he does not stay on topic and has to push tests back because of it. the tests have nothing to do with his books or his lectures. i regret every second of that class.

4.0
2.0
PHILO352
Nov 24, 2006

I hated this class. The prof. over-explained everything, he's boring, has mood-swings, and is biased. This class made me hate waking up in the morning. OH, and don't argue w/any of his views b/c no matter what UR wrong to him. It's easy, but not worth taking.

3.0
2.0
PHIL352
Dec 26, 2006

He is fairly unbiased and explains most things well. I think he thinks most ppl know the history of Christianity and Judaism and goes over it quickly. This should be an easy class but he doesn't go over the tests well and you can lose points easily, bringing your grade down.

5.0
2.0
PHIL300
Jan 13, 2007

I took this class over the summer and it was grueling. Having to sit through three hours in a cramped room is pretty bad, but thoroughly discussing the material, participating in active debate, and having a sense of humor really made his class that much better. Great intellectual exercise AND study guides for tests! Can't get any easier than that.

5.0
2.0
PHIL300
May 19, 2007

great teacher! Some days are slow, but most days time flys by quickly. Has a sense of humor and makes class extremely interesting. Low points class but it's easy. Helpful study guides that makes it impossible not to pass!

4.0
3.0
PHIL352
May 24, 2007

he is a cool teacher. you just have to pay attention or you will get lost. yea sometimes he goes off topic but its more for humor and it actually makes his lecture more interesting. if you pay attention in class, take this guy because it will be easy. and barely any book use except for projects.

5.0
2.0
PHIL310
May 29, 2007

This teacher is great. Nice guy and intelligent. But if you take this class, you must come almost everyday and take good notes. If you take good notes, you'll do great. No final or tests. He just makes you write a few papers. Overall, take this teacher. You'll learn a lot.

4.0
3.0
PHILO352
Jun 13, 2007

His jokes are lame sometimes. He's always taking about his ex-wife and college dates. He's very intelligent but his lectures are dry and boring. Easy A (do EC). Pay attention and take good notes. Quizes off notes.

5.0
1.0
PHIL352
Jun 26, 2007

He is helpful & nice. Lectures are oral. Just take some notes. His tests are open-ended questions like: Name 8 things about Moses. 2 4pg interpretive papers - easy. 1 Bible reaction paper. Overall, EASY class.

3.0
2.0
PHIL321
Jan 5, 2008

Didn't study or read the book still passed with a "C" which is all I needed it. Some information on test is from the book but its never used in class. You can almost get by without. Lectures are overloaded and somewhat dry. Attendence is periodically taken and account for few points in class.

4.0
2.0
PHIL300
May 2, 2008

This guys knows his stuff about Philosophy. I gained a different perspective in some things after taking his class. Lectures aren't as bad as some say. Pay attention and you'll do well. Oh boy, does he love Socrates...

4.0
4.0
PHIL300
Dec 11, 2008

good and interesting class. you gain a new perspective on life. if you do the journals and get a c on the midterms and paper you'll do fine. little notes. more just listen and analyze. has some interesting stories about his life.

3.0
4.0
PHIL352
Mar 11, 2009

I took World religions from him and his lectures are pretty much laid out for you. stay in class to take the notes because his lectures are what he bases quizzes on. DO YOUR READING. It's all pretty much easy reading and intresting. You'll need it for his test and ask questions. He has a round about way if answering them but it's always fun to hear

3.0
2.0
PHIL310
May 23, 2009

Pretty easy class. No tests or quizzes. You write 5 papers and 20 reading journals and thats it. He takes attendance, but sometimes forgets. He missed about 5 classes and was at least 10 minutes late everyday. He's pretty relaxed. You can share a book with a group of people because the reading journals aren't due until last week of class.

5.0
1.0
PHIL300
Jun 8, 2009

funny guy. laid back and makes the time pass pretty quickly. homework is easy, tests were simple. the class is a lot of opinion and ideas. hard to mess that up. easy B course

4.0
1.0
PHIL300
Jun 24, 2009

His lectures are basically answers towards his exams. Hard to fail or mess up in his class if you get the gist of what he is saying. If you listen you'll pass with at least a B.

4.0
4.0
PHIL352
Jul 21, 2009

I took this particular class during summer and I got an A- it was honestly hard. But do work real hard, follow his verbal lectures and do extensive reading. Do also the extra credits..

3.0
4.0
PHIL310
Aug 28, 2009

Van Patten is virtually useless on giving feedback. I received "good" written on the back of every paper that I turned in. I usually got an A on the papers but not 100%. It would have been nice to be told what needed improvement in the papers. The subject matter is interesting however and with good attendance and writing skills the class isn't hard

5.0
1.0
PHIL352
Nov 19, 2009

Great professor. u wont like him at first but u will slowly come to like him .. ^^ Easy A if you do all the work.

2.0
3.0
PHIL352
Dec 8, 2009

If you do NOT want to hear the same lecture two classes in a row, or hear someone's political and religious rants, or have the textbook read to you, don't take his classes. Waste of time and money. Nice guy, logical, but he's still a time-waster.

3.0
3.0
PHIL352
Dec 11, 2009

I was really disappointed with this class. He lectured every class for 50 minutes and takes roll every class. If you can listen to a professor talk for that long and pay attention then you should do well in this class. This is not a participation class. He usually brushes you off if you ask a question. He offers extra credit so a B is feasible

4.0
1.0
BIBLE101
Dec 16, 2009

His class was awesome and I wish preachers would have to take this class. I learned a lot and it was a real eye opener that Revelations shouldn't even be in the bible. If you are christian, atheist, or Jew take this class it wasn't hard and you learn.

4.0
4.0
PHIL356
Jan 7, 2010

The people who are saying bad things about him and the closed minded people who thought his class would be sunday school. He has opinions and will listen to yours, but he's not afraid to argue. He'll respect you if you stick to your beliefs. Must come to class. Two 5 page papers. 1 reflection paper. 2 short answer tests. I loved this class.

5.0
1.0
PHIL352
Mar 10, 2010

Chuck is a great professor, he makes philosophy easy to understand for those who think its boring. It's not that hard of a class, do your work People who are disappointed because you have to attend class and actually read, wellwelcome to the real world, that's college and if you plan on transferring to a 4-year then get used to it.

2.0
5.0
PHILO300
Mar 15, 2010

dont lecture to long in class. the class get bored and out of focus.

3.0
4.0
PHIL310
Apr 6, 2010

Passionate...knows his stuff..all lecture...no tests...jus papers...really critical on papers..boring..a lot of people might like this class...but not for me

1.0
4.0
PHIL300
May 4, 2010

He is not a good professor and is not very friendly and will say some things that are not classroom appropriate and will argue with you just for the sake of arguing I DO NOT RECOMMEND TAKING HIM AS A PROF. TAKE SCHUBERT INSTEAD

4.0
2.0
PHIL352
May 11, 2010

No surprises in his class. Very boring though. Good daily naps happen here. His packets cover everything and he doesn't elaborate that much. I wouldn't attend class if he didn't take role. Test #1 easy, Test #2 hard unless your hinu or a muslim. Bring a pillow!

2.0
3.0
PHIL310
May 23, 2010

Missed Class. Didn't cover all material. Said Grades would be posted by yesterday, and they're still not up.

2.0
4.0
PHIL310
May 27, 2010

no tests-all essays. Easy class if you're willing to deal. This professor is old, he is very old-fashioned. He seems to be very hard headed. He attacked us in class about our generation and how we LACK so much - but he doesn't know or mean to I think. He hates Sociology and Psychology. He always speaks and lectures us his opinion.

1.0
5.0
PHIL300
May 30, 2010

Dont take this class you'll just end up hating him

3.0
4.0
PHILO310
Jun 5, 2010

I have taken both 310/352. This professor is knowledgable in his field however it is rare for him to acknowledge, adapt, or try to understand a students idea/problems. This professsor will flatly tell you "you're wrong" or make a mockery of you. Its not a cushioned or comfortable atmosphere & there is no feedback for essays.

5.0
4.0
PHIL310
Nov 21, 2010

I don't know why people doesn't like Chuck..yea, he can be mean if you irritate him..but overall I think he is an excellent prof. He would give you examples you never even thought of or use his life as an example and its funny..I think he is a great prof, he just lectures..pretty hard essays but he's very clear about his teaching!

4.0
5.0
PHIL320
Dec 1, 2010

Overall not too bad. He is VERY opinionated and cynical, so if that bothers him i would avoid the class. Attendance is mandatory. He expects a lot, and the class is difficult, but doable. Not recommend for a first semester student. He also has 16 journals all due at the end of the term, so if you procrastinate, avoid him.

3.0
1.0
PHIL310
Dec 4, 2010

Good Prof. Has some liberal views. I got an A without ever opening the book.

2.0
2.0
WORLDREL
Dec 14, 2010

Lectures are very dry, tests are extremely hard compared to what he lectures on. Very few assignments so if you bomb one thing, you're screwed. Funny on some occasions but mostly boring.

4.0
3.0
PHIL352
Apr 14, 2011

I took his religion class, and it's easy to get an A even if you bomb something as long as you do a bunch of extra-credit. Still, he's really assertive about plagerism, so you HAVE TO PUT YOUR SOURCES AFTER EVERY SENTENCE!or else he might fail you :[

5.0
2.0
PHIL300
May 2, 2011

Very informative and works to keep the lectures relevant to current students. He is engaging and exciting when lecturing and offers all the test questions at the beginning of each section so you can prepare for an A. Very knowledgeable in Phil and passionate about teaching it others. Highly recommend.

5.0
1.0
PHIL300
May 4, 2011

Chuck is awesome! the class itself is pretty easy, the topics are interesting, and he makes it easy to understand. He gives packets which tell you everything and covers the material well so theres no way you cant get at least a B. the journals (due weekly) are kind a drag but thats the only time you will use the book. His stories are funny!Take him

5.0
1.0
PHIL300
May 4, 2011

Chuck is awesome! the tests are all essays but he gives packets and covers all of the material well and tells you which ones to look at on the study guide! journals(due weekly) are kind of a drag but thats the only time you use the book. Tells tons of stories all funny! and makes the topics easy to understand. Prettty chill kind of easy on grading!

3.0
3.0
PHIL300
May 9, 2011

kinda easy class everything is essays and you dont have to really show up because he gives you packets with all the info you need for the essay including the essay questions, he really just clarifies whats in the packets in class but the class is pretty boring. He is pretty funny and laid back and the essays are somewhat easy

5.0
1.0
PHILPHIL
May 10, 2011

Great class, great professor, and learned a lot. Take his class to get an A on a GE class. Definitely reccomend taking his class. Oh, and if you could share a book with a friend(s), you should.

5.0
2.0
PHIL300
Oct 7, 2011

VanPatten is a rock star of philosophy. He loves the subject and has been teaching it for a very long time. He encourages open discussions about the topics covered and tries to make the material relevant to todays reality. He spends time addressing the class as who they are and encourages who they can be. Excellent!

5.0
3.0
PHILRELG
Nov 7, 2011

Changed everything for me, a great professor

2.0
3.0
PHIL315
Dec 2, 2011

grades hard on papers, dont fluff your essays get straight to the point.he gives premad notes so you just gotta follow along, organization not the best, and sylabus is usally modified throughout the year , my downfall was the essays , alaways got a b on them,hes VERY sarcastic and like to say "Im not sure what you asking", make u look dumb..

4.0
2.0
PHIL356
Dec 19, 2011

Have an open mind, lots of reading; Extra Credit available, Mid-Term & Final will tell you exactly what to study, Take good notes during lectures - Only 3 assignments w/lots of notice, get straight to the point NO FLUFF! Grades fair but Hard, Returns work quickly! Very Interesting Class Patton is VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE.. Life Stories are Funny.

5.0
3.0
PHIL352
Jan 19, 2012

My favorite professor. He is funny and intelligent. His lectures are to the point. There are only 3 tests, non comprehensive, and if you study the notes and read the chapters in the book, the tests are pretty easy. Three papers to do throughout the semester, but he gives you lots of time and gives you exact directions. Not difficult. RECOMMEND!!!!

5.0
1.0
PHIL352
Apr 26, 2012

Have made multiple friends take him! He's really smart and I loved his classes. I took another one of his classes even though I didn't need it.

5.0
1.0
PHILO300
May 29, 2012

AMAZING! Also very interesting course, makes you double think. Tests consist of questions he hands out before the section. Lectures are based off of book chapters and his own view. Chilled laid back professor but going to class will be mandatory to understand what is exactly going on.

5.0
2.0
PHIL356
Aug 11, 2012

I took Phil 310, 352, and 356 with him. He is absolutely wonderful, and I have nothing but good things to say about him and his classes. He is fair, thorough, and GENUINELY cares about his student's success. Be forewarned: the books are used minimally so try and get used copies. He became a mentor to me and I will always be grateful for his help.

4.0
2.0
PHIL310
Nov 17, 2012

I took Chuck's ethics class and learned about ethics, sex, and a lady named Nancy. He's a good guy, and enjoys teaching. He can be a bit stubborn sometimes and is a little quick to shoot down questions. Show up to class unless you want a bad grade, take good notes, and start your essays early. If you do this, you're guaranteed a good grade.

5.0
1.0
PHIL310
Nov 26, 2012

Professor Van Patten is straight to the point and is absolutely crystal clear about what he expects in his assignments.

5.0
3.0
PHI320
Dec 15, 2012

He is a great teacher i have not gotten my grade yet the final is not till next week excellent class and im taking his other classes next semester. his lecture has doesnt seem to corrispond tests but maybe i just dont test well. very infomative challenges your beliefe in a positive way. makes you think about what you stad for

4.0
2.0
PHIL352
Dec 28, 2012

Very interesting class and a very informative professor. Reading is highly recommend and attending classes affect grades. Relates the subject with personal stories an ordinary life to keep the class interesting.

5.0
1.0
PHIL310
Jan 3, 2013

He is straight to the point and very clear. The class consists of no tests/exams/finals only five essays, one essay being the what we turned in on final day. The only homework is weekly reading/journals which were simple. He is very easy and entertaining as he incorporates life stories to his lectures. I would def recommend!

4.0
2.0
PHIL310
Jan 16, 2013

DO THE READING WEEKLY! I can not stress this enough as its roughly 20-30% of your grade. Other than that, this class is a breezy only a few papers to write (5-6), no exams, no final as your last paper counts as the final. Make sure you site every source even the textbook and keep your phone off, he hates electronics in class. would highly recommend

5.0
2.0
PHIL300
May 11, 2013

I absolutely love Professor Van Patten! His sense of humor, his stories, his overall teaching style! Probably one of the best Philosopher professor out there, hands down. Thanks to Van Patten, he has made me a smarter, more rounded individual. I never knew I could love Philosophy this much. We need more professors like him!!

4.0
2.0
PHIL310
May 14, 2013

taking his class was so interesting. As others have mentioned, there's no tests, quizzes or exams. just a few essays. he's very simple and straight to the point. DO YOUR WEEKLY JOURNALS!! Those will definitely bite you in the butt.

5.0
2.0
PHIL356
May 22, 2013

This class was an excellent, learning experience! The instructor is knowledgeable, helpful and displays sincere interest in educating. He creates a comfortable learning environment, through open communication. Would definitely recommend!

5.0
3.0
PHIL300
Jul 10, 2013

Professor Charles is amazing and great at his job. He made me love philosophy and now, i can say without a doubt that i am a better thinker. He has a profound knowledge of his subject. He is a hard grader but is willing to help always. I worked for my grade and was happy with my grade- A. Thank you Chuck for being amazing!

5.0
1.0
PHIL352
Jul 25, 2013

I love VAN PATTEN. He may look intimidating and the first day might make you feel like its gonna be hard. But its not hes awesome. he knows his stuff. Plus religion and its origin is very interesting.

2.0
4.0
COS126
Grade: Incomplete
Nov 12, 2013

I really don't see why everyone seems to like this professor in these ratings. It may be my own lack of interest in the subject but I fight falling asleep during his lectures, his tests are difficult, and he's a real smart aleck when people ask questions.

4.0
4.0
PHIL356
Nov 19, 2013

He's clear and I give him credit on doing a good job at teaching a subject shrouded in a lot of controversy. He is incredibly smart.

3.0
3.0
PHIL352
Dec 29, 2013

He is monotone and cynical. I don't see why some students like him. I talked to him twice in a polite manner and he yelled at me both times. He takes what could be an amazing class and makes it boring. Had to bring coffee to class to stay awake. He even went so far as to say he would never teach again after my class. Rude. I don't recommend.

4.0
2.0
PHIL352
Jan 4, 2014

I got an A in this class with very minimal effort. I found some of the material interesting but he goes on and on and on over simple concepts sometimes. He has something against technology. He'll take your phone for checking your calendar while talking about a schedule. Overall I liked him.

1.0
5.0
0000
Mar 12, 2014

Worst teacher I have ever took! I don't recommend taking his class. He is very rude and sarcastic. When I came to ask him for help he ignores you and makes you look stupid.

5.0
2.0
PHIL310
Grade: A
May 2, 2014

Took PHIL 310 and 352 with Chuck. I thought he was pretty easygoing and funny, but it is true if someone asks a dumb question or tries to argue he can be a bit short and stubborn. 310 consisted of 5 papers and a journal, 352 was three tests, two religious site visits and a faith statement. Both are easy As with not a whole bunch of effort.

3.0
4.0
PHIL352
Grade: Pass
May 10, 2014

Class consists of 2 site visit reports (holy site for Eastern/Western religion), 6 page faith statement (your belief in regards to faith/religion), 1 quiz, and 2 exams (Eastern religion, Western religion). Lectures directly from packet he gives you, monotone. Quiz and exams are difficult and require a lot of studying. Take someone else.

4.0
3.0
PHIL300
Grade: A
Jul 6, 2014

I took Professor Van Patten over the summer and he is an awesome teacher. Thanks to him, I can apply my critical thinking skills anywhere I go. His grading is very fair and let's you know what his expectations are up front. ARC is very lucky to have a great teacher as Van Patten. If you want to learn, I highly recommend taking him.

4.0
1.0
PHILOSOPHY354
Grade: B+
Aug 3, 2014

He's a good professor. The only thing I did not like was that, He literally DIScourages you from talking, in fear of proving him wrong. His ideas and opinions get thrown into lecture a lot. Other then that, his work load is easy and his exams are easier! Just listen and pay attention

2.0
4.0
PHIL300
Aug 5, 2014

This professor is okay. He always wants to be right when ever he is approached by a student in class and he likes to make them feel dumb. I thought this class was a little confusing and hard. It is time consuming and the professor makes it seem worse. You definitely need to study if u want a good grade. Hard work is the key to this class.

2.0
3.0
PHIL352
Aug 21, 2014

Might be hard to follow lectures as he alludes to his life, the evils of technology, and how education isn't what it used to be. Despite attitude and digressions, I was personally able to follow the lectures and loved his class until I experienced his a blatant disrespect for students. Class is very doable, just avoid personal interaction.

1.0
5.0
PHIL300
Nov 24, 2014

I pretty much failed this class... His lectures are amazingly boring. He'll make students feel so dumb. He's unclear. Doesn't even know how to answer his own question. He is so against cellphones that he won't allow a students to take a photo of his lectures. It's confusing. Prepare to teach yourself.

5.0
2.0
PHIL352
Dec 17, 2014

He is a wonderful teacher. Lectures are insightful and meaningful. He really knows his stuff. He is patient with students but does expect people to be respectful in class. I really learned a lot from this class, and highly recommend him as a teacher. If you pay attention to lectures, textbooks are not needed. Tests are easy if you prepare yourself

4.0
3.0
PHIL300
Grade: A
May 7, 2015

Prof. Van Patten is a character. Take his class if you are willing to learn! He encourages participation, but make sure you know how to defend yourself if he asks you a question in return. He requires 3 papers and a journal. Papers can be hard if you don't follow his criteria. Ask questions if you're stuck and you'll pass. Good prof. overall! :)

5.0
2.0
PHIL356
May 29, 2015

Great teacher, gives out a clear reading guide; we went through the entire Bible in 16 weeks. Read on schedule, and take notes in class. He basically gives the answers away for the tests in his lectures. I loved this class and Dr. VanPatten respects yours beliefs. Also he challenges you to look at the Bible from the eyes of the writers environment.

4.0
2.0
PHIL352
Grade: B+
Jul 22, 2015

Very easy going teacher and has an evident grading criteria. His lectures may be long but if you listen that'll benefit on the tests. Most material is learned from in-class notes and textbook is not needed. Gives credit for showing up and major extra credit points are given at end for extra completed assignments, take advantage of this!

4.0
3.0
INTROTOPHIL
Grade: B
Aug 26, 2015

Funny teacher. Gives you a packet with the things he goes over in his lectures. It includes the essay questions that are on the test. The tests are made up of about 3-4 essay questions and nothing else.

2.0
4.0
PHIL300
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 23, 2015

Honestly I hate his class. He's very blunt to the point where he's just rude, and won't give any extra help on assignments. I asked for help on an essay, and he just said, "Read the instructions." Not helpful at all, and has a very arrogant attitude. Took him for Phil 300 AND 352. Never taking him again.

3.0
1.0
PHIL352
Grade: A+
Dec 14, 2015

Boring lectures. Mandatory attendance otherwise no one would show up. Changes curriculum. He's never heard of D2L. Loses papers. Claims to be improving but after 20 years, he still sucks far behind all other professors. No cellphones. He thinks this is high school but there are people in his class older than he is. Only redeeming factor: easiness

5.0
3.0
PHIL310
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 18, 2015

He is intimidating at first but he's an amazing teacher. He can be rude sometimes but also empathetic if you take the right approach. His lectures are long but he incorporates entertaining stories about his life. You must read the book and must prepare for the essay because the class grade is based on them. Overall great guy just stay awake!

3.0
4.0
PHIL300
Dec 18, 2015

One of the most boring professors I have had. He will start teaching then go off on a tangent for 15 minutes and then jump right back in, can be hard to follow. He gives you a packet to study which is nice though. He wants you to be honest in your opinion, tried that and got bad grades, told him what I thought he wanted to hear and grades improved.

5.0
1.0
PHILO310
Dec 28, 2015

Funniest professor ever! He knows how to teach and makes lecture so entertaining that class passes by so quick. He can be harsh, but he cares about teaching all of his students. He enjoys to debate too, so be prepared for it if you ask questions! Essays are fun and easy too!

4.0
3.0
PHIL310
Grade: B+
Apr 24, 2016

Excellent lectures. Leave your cell phones at home bc zero tolerance. Love how he incorporates his personal experiences into material to make it interesting. Great class and really enjoyed him.

1.0
3.0
PHIL352
Jun 10, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Where do I begin? He puts students down for asking questions. Gives a ton of misinformation about Islam. Most students don't do any research and probably will take his word for it. Is intolerant of other religions. Puts down atheists. Has a huge ego. Avoid at all costs.

1.0
4.0
PHI320
Grade: B-
May 25, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Is very into himself. Boring. If you aren't a Catholic, beware! He talks a LOT. DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS.

Tough Grader
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
3.0
PHIL352
Grade: A
Jul 10, 2017
Would take again

Extremely knowledgeable, entertaining and the time passes quickly. He tells many stories but most very quirky and funny. Must participate, strict about cell phones (be respectful) but he is overly fair with grades. Tests are easy if you do the work and the class is explained well on the syllabus with no surprises. Recommend

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
2.0
3.0
PHIL300
Grade: C
Aug 29, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This professor made me feel like an outcast. Called me out individually on everything. Even personal matters. His grading, I woudn't say is necessarily fair, he writes "fluff" on all of your papers even if you've spent hours upon hours writing it. No powerpoints, no structured lectures. He hands out packets of his notes and talks up a storm.

Tough Grader
SO MANY PAPERS
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
1.0
PHIL300
Grade: A+
Dec 2, 2021
Would take again

Beat teacher ever. He, unlike other philosophy teachers, asks for student interpretations instead of telling them they're wrong. Great listener and is always willing to share his thoughts and help as well

Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

92%

Textbook Required

90%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

89% confidence
Based on 13 grades
Most common grades:
A (5)
B+ (3)
Not sure yet (2)
Grade Distribution
A(7)B(2)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(3)
Based on 17 reported grades
A: 5
B+: 3
Not sure yet: 2
A+: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (2)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (1)
Participation matters (1)
Skip class? You won't pass. (1)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (1)
SO MANY PAPERS (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.18 avg change
Apr
Jun
May
Jul
Aug
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL9

5.0

(1)

PHILISOPHY

5.0

(1)

INTTOPHILOSOP

5.0

(1)

PHILOSOPHY300

5.0

(2)

PIL310352

5.0

(1)
+33 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL320

5.0

0000

5.0

COS126

4.0

PHI320

3.5

PHIL9

3.0

Similar Professors