3.3

Clifford Burgess

Linguistics - Simon Fraser University

3.3
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
46%
Would Retake
171
Reviews
3.3
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
3.2
Helpful
3.3
Clarity

46%

Would Retake

171

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

47

4

47

3

24

2

29

1

24

What Students Say

Lectures were long but he's super engaging

LING100 - 4.0 rating

Hardest multiple choice exams imaginable

LING110 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

62%

Textbook Required

78%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 18 grades
Most common grades:
A- (4)
B- (3)
B+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(6)C(3)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 20 reported grades
A-: 4
B-: 3
B+: 3
C+: 3
Common Tags
Tough Grader (5)
Gives good feedback (4)
Amazing lectures (3)
Skip class? You won't pass. (3)
TEST HEAVY (3)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (2)
Get ready to read (2)
Tough grader (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.63 avg change
Aug
Sep
Jul
Dec
Apr
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

110

5.0

(1)

LING362363

5.0

(1)

LING200GRMMR

5.0

(1)

LING104

5.0

(1)

LING362

4.3

(6)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

LINGUISTICS100

5.0

LIN100

5.0

LING

5.0

LING200GRMMR

5.0

LING282W

5.0

Reviews (171)
3.0
3.0
220
Dec 19, 2002

No Comments

4.0
2.0
LING110
Feb 26, 2003

No Comments

2.0
4.0
LING220
Mar 13, 2003

No Comments

5.0
2.0
LING110
Mar 24, 2003

he's a funny man

3.0
5.0
LING220
Mar 26, 2003

I think he's hard, but then again I am a slacker.

5.0
3.0
LING100
Mar 27, 2003

very enjoyable course if taken with this guy...but relatively much memory work invovled...

3.0
5.0
LING220
Mar 31, 2003

very hard prof. he tries to be funny

4.0
5.0
LING220
Apr 2, 2003

Not an easy course, good prof but is just very hard

2.0
3.0
LING220
Apr 4, 2003

He made the easy stuff HARD!!!!

1.0
5.0
LING100
Apr 4, 2003

NO Comment, Absolutely NO Comment!!!!!

2.0
5.0
LING220
Apr 6, 2003

The lecture is okay and so are his notes, but then again his exams and assignments are hard. Nice guy though.

4.0
2.0
LING100
Apr 7, 2003

I'm surprised at the number of people in other courses who say he's hard. His lectures are..kinda interesting, tries to be funny, and his exams are pretty easy. Just follow his notes and go to lectures.

5.0
3.0
LING220
Apr 8, 2003

nice prof, explains stuff quite well, knows his stuff, very enthusiastic, tries to entertain the students, but not very good at it. Makes hard tests though, but easy if you study and go to lectures and pay attention. don't take his class if u want marks.

3.0
4.0
LING220
Apr 16, 2003

notes are understandable and easy to grasp but the tests and assignments are a whole different issue

3.0
4.0
LING220
Apr 23, 2003

he gives you notes but very confusing if you don't know what you are doing. Assignment are HARD, exams are average.

4.0
2.0
LING220
Apr 28, 2003

Tries to be funny in class.It helps to keep you awake at 830 in the morning. Helpful ONLY when it's not near an assignment... he won't say anything (nothing close) about anything on the assignment.If you study and read in advance, then you should do ok.

2.0
5.0
LING110
May 6, 2003

Not an easy course, not the mosy interesting lectures (for what should be pretty interesting subject matter). Not helpful when seeking help. But definately a nice, and friendly guy. Cracks a lot of stillborn jokes in class. Could/Should be a good prof.

1.0
5.0
LING100
May 6, 2003

he is the worst prof that I ever ever have in my university life!!! Yah, you can *only* study notes for his midterms, but what's the point we buy the textbooks? Trying to sucking our money or what?

4.0
4.0
LING360
Jul 9, 2003

He cracks too many stupid jokes, and hes usually the only one laughing. He's got great notes, very good/clear weekly summary notes that he posts on his webpage. He knows his stuff really well. Not an easy marker though, his questions are demanding.

4.0
3.0
LING360
Jul 10, 2003

Clear prof with decent notes. Quizzes fair, but on final some really tricky stuff we barely glanced at in class. He thinks he's always right, so if you disagree, it's VERY hard to get him to change his mind (or your mark!)

5.0
5.0
LING200
Sep 8, 2003

Hard material, but he is so helpful. Very student-friendly teaching style. Remembers faces from a lecture hall of 100's.

4.0
2.0
LING100
Dec 3, 2003

provides detailed (but poorly formatted) notes, cracks lame jokes that aren't funny or endearing, easy exams provided you study his notes, but don't waste your time and money on the "required" texts

5.0
2.0
LING100
Dec 3, 2003

Very good use of media in his course. Usage of website, tape recordings, and such are very helpful for 1st-year students. Enjoyable and interesting material. I personally am delighted with his effort to make light of his course.

4.0
3.0
LING100
Dec 3, 2003

don't waste $ on the required text books. he's usually pretty clear when going over his notes in class.

3.0
3.0
LING363
Dec 13, 2003

Interesting lectures. Not very helpful once the show is over.

2.0
4.0
LING110
Dec 14, 2003

midterms are fair but his final is nothing like the midterms and will eat you alive.he cracks stupid jokes.

4.0
4.0
LING100
Apr 20, 2004

He is an interesting prodfessor, but be aware of the exams. Interesting lecture doesn't mean you have easy papers!!

5.0
3.0
LING110
Jul 15, 2004

Great teaching.Good professor.It will be easier if he put up a lot of practice on the web.If u pay attention to everything he says,u r in good shape.

2.0
5.0
LING110
Jul 29, 2004

super hard; even the students major in ling cant do his ling 110 hw; no notes in class at all; pretend to be funny, but not funny at all!!!

1.0
4.0
LING110
Aug 5, 2004

Worst professor I've ever had! Aside from the barrage of horrible jokes that will leave you numb, his teaching style is extremely unhelpful. Oh, and he's an arrogant ****, who refuses to admit when's he wrong. Rapidly becoming senile.

3.0
5.0
LING110
Aug 7, 2004

Very picky and easily irritated. VERY hard marker - first assignment he lowers your score by half by subtracting your wrong answers to your right answers and the whole semester you're second guessing whether or not your know what you're doing.

1.0
4.0
LING110
Aug 7, 2004

boo-urns, avoid his classes at all costs

1.0
5.0
LING110
Aug 8, 2004

very hard, makes up stupid jokes dat arent funny at all. exams are ridiculous. he doesnt even know how to do the exams

2.0
5.0
LING110
Aug 26, 2004

Super hard, Quite cold and unhelpful, he doesn't answer question during his office hours but encourage us to go to his office hours, which is ironic. My tutor can explain things more clear than he does. Lectures are unorganized. Sometimes he is rude.

4.0
2.0
LING110
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
Sep 10, 2004

i think he's a funny prof, sometimes will joke. his midterms and final exam are ok, not too difficult, i think. he reviews and does lots of applications to get u to know the material. not a bad prof.

4.0
5.0
LING100
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Oct 5, 2004

no curbed marks. hard tests. fun class. If you dont care about marks take this class. If you do dont

3.0
5.0
LING100
Oct 14, 2004

hard tests, funny class though.

4.0
4.0
LING100
Oct 18, 2004

Very Articulated, tests are STRAIGHT out from notes.. Dont even bother with the readings

1.0
3.0
LING110
Oct 31, 2004

Not helpful at all. Tries to be funny, but his arrogant style constanlty gets in his way. Doesn't like to be challenged intellectually. Part of SFU's old boys club establishment.

5.0
2.0
LING100
Nov 8, 2004

Fantastic prof! Goes out of his way to help keen students, is very motivated & really loves what he teaches. Great course! I got an A on my first midterm, but I studied hard. Midterms straight out of the notes. He's funny & engaging & makes lectures interesting. Notes available on net before class!

4.0
5.0
LING100
Nov 10, 2004

Well, seeing as this is a requirement for me, he's making the course BEARABLE. He's funny at times and really not at others. His tests are ruthless and complete "fluff": rather than testing our knowledge, he tests us on little irrelevant details.

5.0
3.0
LING100
Nov 11, 2004

He is very dynamic, class is always interesting

2.0
5.0
LINGUISTICS100
Nov 11, 2004

Unfortunately, this class is a headache. The assigned readings are dry, unnecessarily complicated and excessive. Maybe Cliff should consider revising his expectations for the course (it's a first year course after all, right? It's also an elective that is not REQUIRED for LING majors anyway).

3.0
4.0
LING100
Nov 21, 2004

Rude and easily annoyed. class sucks and is boring as HELL. my pillow needed a pillow

4.0
4.0
LING200
Nov 21, 2004

best prof. ever! well-organized. easy to follow. but little hard on quiz though... very helpful. interesting lecture. not boring even though three hours night class~

5.0
3.0
LING100
Nov 23, 2004

Professor B. really helps you out if you show some initiative. And vervets really are important!

4.0
3.0
LING200
Nov 26, 2004

good prof quiz is a little bit hard ,but lecture is good.

4.0
2.0
LING100
Nov 26, 2004

Nice Prof. funny guy...the midterms are fair, Textbooks are useless in this class= =!His notes are good enough to get a B+ on the tests, as long as you memorize thoes stuff on the notes..anyway, He's not bad!!

5.0
2.0
LING100
Nov 29, 2004

He is a really interesting prof. His tests are not way to specific. The readings are kind of dry, but you can get away without reading them and still do well.

4.0
3.0
LING100
Nov 30, 2004

Good Teaching style, clear, makes the course interesting to listen to. Most of the stuff on the tests are on the notes, but the tests are hard. The readings are unnecessary and very boring (dry).

4.0
2.0
LING200
Dec 3, 2004

funny and cute:), makes u laugh through the lecture, and he`s the best in LING DEPT,. Lectures are clear and well-organized,nice guy!

3.0
4.0
LING100
Dec 3, 2004

Cute and shiny head. ;). Meh. Really boring and bland. Readings are useless and tests don't actually quiz you on what you know (and this is coming from someone who's getting a mark in the 90s right now). Readings are unnecessary. He's a good guy, but I would take a stats course over this one.

1.0
5.0
LING100
Dec 6, 2004

I agree. Horrible Tests. NOT FUNNY. Terrible and dry class overall.

1.0
5.0
LING100
Dec 6, 2004

The guy himself - not bad. The guy as a prof - horrible. If you are used to getting A's in courses that force you to actually think, don't bother with this mediocre elective.

1.0
5.0
LINGUISTICS100
Dec 10, 2004

Jokes are lame and tests are lamer. Ugh.

2.0
5.0
LING100
Dec 20, 2004

Not the best prof in the world. Tough marking and dry material.

3.0
5.0
LIN100
Dec 21, 2004

Tough exams, dry materials, it's bad to take his class unless you are familiar with his teaching style.

5.0
3.0
LING100
Dec 22, 2004

Exams were tough, but I still think the guy is an awesome prof and great person. I love his evil little jokes! Those that say he's not funny just aren't smart enough to get the jokes. He's really nice,got a great sense of humor, good teaching ability, and is now one of my favorite profs.

3.0
5.0
LING100
Dec 29, 2004

Not a terrible class. Scaled the marks, which is good. He REALLY needs to drop the jokes though; I don't care what the person below said, but you don't have to be "smart" to get them - it's just that they're excruciatingly cheesy and pointless.

4.0
5.0
LING200
Jan 15, 2005

total right! tries to b funny but not at all, quizzes/exams are completely diff. than what we did in class. final was brutal, i recommend NOT to take ANY courses with him, u'll regret, people!

4.0
2.0
LING200
Mar 24, 2005

um...he is very responsible and serious for his teaching...so just be quiet in his class and do whatever he said to u~besides, dont try to argue with him...his tests r kinda fair...i got pretty high markd on MTs but Final~he really puts too much on final~so work hard!

1.0
3.0
LING100
Apr 10, 2005

he's too stubborn to teach, always thinks he's right, and unwilling to discuss matters. on the second midterm he had a VERY ambiguous question. he was unwilling to listen to my concerns and i ended up getting in a big argument with him in his office.

5.0
3.0
LING200
Apr 29, 2005

Great prof!

5.0
3.0
LING220
Jul 20, 2005

Very entertaining to listen to.

2.0
4.0
LING110
Aug 31, 2005

No Comments

5.0
3.0
LING220
Oct 23, 2005

dr. burgess is a really responsible prof. he expects you to work hard, because he puts the same amount of time in terms of preparing for each class. his exams are fairly harder compare to exercises on the text book. he spends extra time going over problems with his students, very rare to find a prof. like that=)

1.0
5.0
LING363
Oct 30, 2005

no comment

5.0
3.0
LING362363
Grade: A
Dec 13, 2005

awesome, funny, and very interesting makes the students work hard for their grades

5.0
5.0
LING200
Dec 14, 2005

No Comments

2.0
4.0
LING100
Apr 13, 2007

No Comments

5.0
1.0
LING100
Apr 24, 2007

Great Prof, kept the class interesting. He's really good at explaining the material and does a lot of review so you know what's likely to end up on the exam. He made the class really enjoyable.

4.0
5.0
LING100
May 10, 2007

He might be clear in his teaching and can communicate well but the exam is tough though and also he is not really friendly.

5.0
3.0
LING362
Jun 18, 2007

the best prof i've had at sfu. probably the best prof i've ever had in my post-secondary education. excellent lecturer, his notes are very helpful, and he's well-prepared for class.

5.0
3.0
LING360
Nov 24, 2007

Great prof. He might seem a little stand-offish in class, but is very approachable and gives so much help if you go and talk to him. Tests are difficult, but fair. He gave study guides for all his lectures, so if you devote enough time to studying them, you'll be fine.

3.0
4.0
LING100
Jun 2, 2008

lame jokes.even lamer exams

5.0
4.0
LING362
Jul 9, 2008

nice + funi guy...well prepared + organized...will help sort out any problems w/ the materials as long as u'll willing to ask...he's a tough, but fair marker...if u've been to his lectures then u'r already bound to pass...good teaching style...won't put u to sleep for sure~

1.0
5.0
LING220
Jul 11, 2008

Extremely hard midterm exam. Assignments are worth 15% each, and they are tricky, have only one week to finish. Class average for the midterm was 52% (before scaling).. overall class Average is around C+. Very pathetic, considering that this should be one of the easiest elective courses.

2.0
5.0
LING220
Jul 14, 2008

The problem with Cliff is that he gives us really easy examples in the lecture and textbook, which are not helpful for his assignments and exams. The questions he gives are ambiguous, difficult, and he may use words we've never seen before. I heard everyone saying how easy Ling 220 is, but just don't see how it can be true.

1.0
5.0
LING220
Jul 14, 2008

hard exams and hard assignments. Linguistic 220 is considered as the easiest elective..but do not think so for this one..probably do not take it with this prof...the class average overall is C+ after scaling. The other prof has the average around B...

3.0
4.0
LING220
Jul 20, 2008

I just hope that he scales the entire class because I'm not prepared to get anything below a B. I tried hard in this class, really hard. He's a great guy and I have hopes he won't let us down.. he has already scaled the midterm.

1.0
5.0
LING220
Jul 22, 2008

Although he is a nice guy, he expects too much from us. We take this course as electives, and I do not think anyone is going to major in linguistic in our class. He scaled the mid term and assignment 1, but its still not good enough. Since the tests and assign are hard. The class average is C and he just said that to us today in class.

4.0
4.0
LING220
Jul 22, 2008

well... Just don't be sad guys... Linguistics is not as easy as you think...

4.0
2.0
LING100
Aug 16, 2008

GOOD Prof...but it seems he taught too much. he conducts the class not like a 100 level course...students must think and think, then do better on his exam...the final is really hard though

1.0
5.0
LING100
Aug 23, 2008

pretends to be nice, extremely hard exams, he makes this course incredibly hard!!! lots of terminology to memorize, linguistics is not as easy as you think, just avoid this guy!

2.0
2.0
LING100
Oct 7, 2008

hes super hard to follow during classes...ive even tried to listen to his recorded lectures and i totally fall asleep. he's hard to follow

5.0
3.0
LING295
Nov 14, 2008

I've taken LING100 and 220 with him also. He's very easy to understand and he keeps you entertained in class. His exams aren't easy, but he's fair and only tests you on material that's covered in class. A fairly easy marker too. You should have no problem getting a B, B+, A- or A if you do the readings, study the material, and attend class.

5.0
2.0
LING100
Nov 27, 2008

It was a fair course, and I found it pretty interesting. He is a fun prof!

4.0
2.0
LING100
Nov 27, 2008

Lectures can be quite boring. He sends you notes every week so all you have to do is sit there in class and make sure that you understand what he is talking about. If you can get someone from the previous semester to send you the questions from previous exams, that is the best, because they are pretty much all the same. Just memorize everything.

5.0
3.0
LING100
Nov 27, 2008

Burgess is an outstanding instructor. Two major components stand out. First, he has a background as an ESL instructor, which shines through in the clarity of his instruction. Second, he was once a lawyer, and his professionalism and high levels of organization are unlike anything I've encountered. If you take school seriously, take him.

5.0
2.0
LING100
Dec 3, 2008

He posts all of the notes online each week, and I honestly don`t find the point in going to class because all he does is go over his notes. You don`t even really need the textbook because his notes are very clear and concise. People complain that his midterms are hard, but I didn`t find them hard - they were fair, people just need to study better.

1.0
5.0
LING100
Dec 11, 2008

Horribly hard. The 100 level course felt like a 400 level due to his inability to adjust it to a younger generation (minus points for that. Also, 3 exams and not one paper??? How do you expect anyone to get higher than a C+??!!

5.0
1.0
LING100
Jan 11, 2009

Great prof. He knows his stuff and teaches with a passion. I came into the course with 0 interest but he made it fun every day. Very clear, helpful, and funny. VERY easy Midterm and Final. GPA booster right here.

5.0
1.0
LING200
Mar 25, 2009

I like cliff a lot! Notes r very clear so that u dont need to attend the lecture at all. He posted sample exams for all midterms and final which is extremely helpful. Kinda fun 2! dont know the final yet.But I will take other courses with him definitely.

5.0
3.0
LING200
Aug 14, 2009

great prof, very professional, organized and funny, Tests are fair, but the fianl is bit tricky. NEGATIVE:answer your question in a round about way to let you think about it first. Do study hard! If you are good at grammar, you are taking advantages of taking this course. it's just like math, you either get it or you don't!

5.0
4.0
LING200
Apr 22, 2010

Took both LING 100 & 200 with him. Great Prof. Really passionate about what he is teaching. Love his lecture style, keeps me awake. Not so easy to get high marks though.

5.0
3.0
LING295
Jul 26, 2010

Those who are whining about test difficulty and not adjusting teaching methods to "100 level students" should get a clue. His classes are not a walk in the park, and they shouldn't be. I've learned a lot through this prof - took 3 courses with him (Ling 100, 220 and 295). If you put in the effort to read and study, you'll do fine.

3.0
5.0
LING100
Oct 6, 2010

Lectures are engaging and attentive. However, that's where his advantages end. His Exams are formed in a way that is extremely roundabout and ambiguous, have too many questions that are too specific and obscure, and he doesn't even talk about them in class at all! I don't recommend him as a GPA booster, I'm saying this after receiving an A-

4.0
5.0
LING100
Nov 28, 2010

Like his lecture,but very difficult midterms and he said the final won't be easy.Not doing curve.

4.0
5.0
LIN100
Dec 13, 2010

Super hard exam for both mid-term, and will be even harder on the final. Don't know if I could pass it or not. Interesting teaching skill, but he makes 100 level course like 400 one. Not a GPA booster. Don't take his course if you want to get a higher GPA.

5.0
5.0
LING100
Dec 16, 2010

very entertaining lectures but extremely difficult exams!2 midterms M/C and final M/C and definitions and short essay.not gpa booster for sure!

2.0
5.0
LING100
Dec 17, 2010

Strongly NoT RECOMMEND to people take this courses as elective!! Midterm and final Exam are freaking hard !! He puted this 100 level course to 400 level!

5.0
2.0
LING100
Dec 17, 2010

Awesome prof! I took Linguistics as an elective out of curiosity and I totally do not regret it! Interesting lectures and lots of practice before exams. If you do your readings on time definitely an easy A!

4.0
4.0
LING220
Dec 22, 2010

His lectures are pretty interesting, however his exams are really hard. Be VERY prepared and study hard... otherwise, avoid this class.

5.0
5.0
LING100
Jan 17, 2011

Like other said, you do want to attend the lectures because he prepares really well and he is humurous! But exams are really demanding! Don't ever take it as an elective, cause you have to study it as a core course! Generally a really nice guy.

5.0
4.0
LING220
Jan 24, 2011

Excellent prof. Straightforward, clear, and obviously interested in what he is teaching, but this course is VERY challenging. Between lectures and the textbook you should have a good understanding of the material but expect the exams to still be difficult. TA Rima's tutorials were not especially useful but the exercises required were.

5.0
3.0
LING100
Jan 27, 2011

neat and useful slides.

4.0
4.0
LING110
Mar 24, 2011

He is a helpful prof but not an easy course.

5.0
3.0
LING200
Apr 1, 2011

I would recommend the teacher but not the specific class. The textbook was extremely useful. Burgess is really good for having extra office hours before midterms and finals.

4.0
4.0
LING200
Apr 11, 2011

85% spent going over homework, 10% waiting for people to answer homework questions, only 5% of the time spent actually teaching us the course material.

4.0
5.0
LING220
Apr 13, 2011

He is passionate about what he is teaching. Tutorials r useful. But his course is wayyyyyyyyy to hard. He assumes that Everyone loves linguistics as much as he does. Wake up! That is not possible.he is good, i personally like him. But i won't recommand my firends to take his course.unless you really llloooovveee linguistics.

5.0
2.0
LING200
Apr 14, 2011

He is a great professor for this course. I'd recommend him to teach LING 200. But I have heard he makes LING 110 really hard. He is passionate about this material, so it's good! He has a lot of office hours, and if you've taken grammar in high school, the level of difficulty isn't too hard. Just read the book, do the practices!

4.0
2.0
LING200
Apr 21, 2011

One of the easiest electives I have taken @ SFU. Buy the textbook for practices, don't really have to read it because his notes already includes all the main points you'll need. The rest is just practice. You don't really have to study for final if you are on track throughout the semester. Easy A, hard to A+.

2.0
4.0
LING220
Jun 22, 2011

Have no interest in discussing about the doubtful grading mistakes, grading system is kinda unfair.

2.0
5.0
LING220
Jul 28, 2011

midterm is very hard. not recommend. every wek has assignment need to due and ppl who didnt do or complete the assignment will deduct 1% of participation mark. never take his class

2.0
5.0
LING220
Aug 2, 2011

NEVER take his course. Teach 3xx level stuff in 2xx courses. tut madatory or receive -1 point. Mid-term extremely hard. Cant imagine how hard the final would be!

4.0
4.0
LING220
Aug 17, 2011

very helpful prof,clear contents during the lecture,however the final is hard.

5.0
3.0
LING110
Aug 18, 2011

disagree with the previous comment, his final was fair,attend lectures&review the midterms, final is not that hard.you can tell he is really knowledgeable and passionate about what he's teaching. very helpful at office hour, doesn't just tell you the answer but rather teach you the process of solving it.has a different sense of humor, i like him.

3.0
4.0
LING110
Aug 23, 2011

Burgess has a dry sense of humor and I personally find him boring. I took this class thinking it would be easy and interesting but I stand corrected. I found the midterms and final exam to be quite difficult considering this is only a first year class. Overall, I feel that I didn't get much out of this class. Boring material and boring prof.

4.0
5.0
LING220
Nov 23, 2011

Lectures are essential! Lectures are recorded and slides are posted. Cliff is very informative and interesting, but his assessment is difficult. Helpful to have a good TA, but you can also see Cliff for help too.

1.0
5.0
LING110
Feb 25, 2012

Come on man! This is just a 100 level class and he makes it likes a 400 level one. Mid- term is extremely tough, final seems better but it's still not that easy. He especially likes to go to the back of the class and ask students questions, so bear in mind not to fall asleep in lecture otherwise you will be embarrassed.

2.0
5.0
LING360
Jul 16, 2012

He is a horrible teacher. I've had four classes with him so far. He is rude and has a cheesy and boring sense of humour. His exams are extremely hard for the courses he teaches (i've had a 100 class with him before.) Don't take his class if you can help it.

4.0
4.0
LING360
Nov 18, 2012

Only take his classes if you are taking school seriously. He is a tough prof and marks are not easy to get. Attending class is a MUST to get a decent mark. 3 hour lecture but he tries to break it up for you with group discussions and administrative stuff to mix it up. I took Ling 200 with him before.

3.0
4.0
LING295
Nov 23, 2012

A very hard marker and not one to truly accept feedback or criticism on his part. He makes things harder than they need to be. Take a course of his if you are willing to pour in plenty of effort.

5.0
1.0
LING110
Jan 29, 2013

His class is easy....if you do the work. He is pleasant....if you pay attention and show respect. Basically, you get from it what you put into it, simple as that. He is definitely one of my favourite professors!

2.0
4.0
LING110
Feb 28, 2013

I noticed he can be really rude when speaking with students including myself. Not a good trait for someone who is supposed to be teaching. He blabbers but not enough clear info, and he makes frequent mitakes which is ok to an extent but not that much.

4.0
4.0
LING360
Mar 17, 2013

His lecture notes were difficult to understand, but the contents were not that hard. If you read the textbooks you will be fine. HOWEVER I do not recommend anyone to take this class with him.

2.0
5.0
LING110
Apr 22, 2013

The Professor has great passion for the course.But neither his lecture is well organized nor the slides context are expressed clearly. The lecture slides are too detailed and complicated. If you are an International student from China as me and seeking a GPA Booster, you would better not choose this professor in ling110.

3.0
3.0
LING110
May 7, 2013

Very knowledgeable in the material of LING110. Has his own sense of humor, but kind of dry lecture! MT questions are hard. Has preference on those hard ones. Class avg. improves on 2nd MT. Enjoy his Word-of-the-day and learn some cool words! Overall, I like this prof, but I hope he can cut down some useless & confusing lines in lecture slides.

4.0
3.0
LING110
May 20, 2013

good prof.. very funny... quizzes are okay.. hard exams though, but he does do review.. not a bad prof, you can tell he cares

1.0
5.0
LING110
May 23, 2013

He is very passionate about ling but this is a 100 level class we do not need this amount useless info. His MT are so head i just sat there and failed, his finals are okay but still very difficult. IF you are looking for a GPA booster this is not the professor you want.

1.0
5.0
LING100
Jun 14, 2013

He is a horrible lecturer! blabbers on and on about nothing in class pretending to make jokes and then makes the MT's super hard and about nothing that you learnt or was in the book. come on! this is a 100 level course. he needs to stop thinking its the most important thing in the world.

4.0
5.0
LING360
Jul 11, 2013

He is the hardest prof ever in linguistics department. His exams were really hard, you must understand all the materials prior to class, otherwise, you will have no ideas what hes talking about in class.

4.0
4.0
LING110
Jul 19, 2013

There is no problem with the prof, its the content of this course may be very dry and tricky for people with out any knowledge of how words are formed. Not a GPA booster definitely, but if you have a high level of attention to detail, than go for it

3.0
4.0
LING110
Jul 23, 2013

You have to read the whole textbook in order to get a good mark. The 1st MT was hard but the 2nd one became easier. I got a D on MT1, an A- on MT2, and a B on the final. THIS COURSE IS NOT A GPA BOOSTER.

3.0
5.0
LING
Aug 11, 2013

Avoid taking any LING courses with him, take only if you want a real challenge. My advice, DON'T :)

2.0
5.0
D100
Aug 14, 2013

Very bad notes he made for students. You cannot catch up with the lecture content without reading the text book throughly. He cannot give clear rules and answers for his questions on his slides. Not recommend this course if you want to have high GPA or don't have enough time for this course.

5.0
5.0
LING200GRMMR
Grade: A-
Aug 17, 2013

Good sense of humour even if not all of his jokes fly. Took LING 110 with him as well, got a fantastic grade but his exams are very difficult. His classes are not easy but if you do the work, you should do fine. No cakewalk. On the upside, he always offers extra office hours and is very approachable during that time.

4.0
2.0
LING110
Nov 7, 2013

Attend Lectures/Listen. Read Notes and use textbook where the lecture notes cover. You will do fine. People who complain obviously do not study. Overall, this class is not too bad

3.0
5.0
LING200
Nov 20, 2013

I took this class because I needed one more lower division to graduate. I love linguistics and I am a constant B to B+ student in Linguistic. I have taken upper division classes in Linguistics that are easier than this. Its not the content that is difficult but his exams are way more difficult than they need to be.

2.0
2.0
LING200
Dec 21, 2013

If you want to get a higher grade in this course. Please choose other instructors. His final is hard and you have to read the whole textbook so than you will not get a bad grade. His lecture is useless and all you can do is to practice a lot.

4.0
2.0
LING110
Mar 27, 2014

Although the class is whooping 3-hours long is an really easy credit. It requires memorization but everything that he tests you on exams are basically similar questions from the weekly quizzes. It can be boring, but he does try his best to make the class interesting. My savior for the class was my merriam-webster's dictionary app! invest in it!

3.0
2.0
LING110
May 7, 2014

Overall, the course is easy and his exams are fair. Lectures can sometimes get boring because he can go on about topics that are unrelated to the lecture but are related to Linguistics. He makes "dad" or "old man" jokes that can sometimes be funny but can also be received as lame by some.

1.0
5.0
LING110
Jul 16, 2014

hard to get a good grade on his exams, all MC questions.

1.0
5.0
LING100
Aug 11, 2014

THE most boring class I've ever taken, mostly because of the prof but the lecture was 3 hours long on Monday... The actual material was interesting, but I would suggest looking it up on your own time rather than wasting money. The worst part was the final exam, which tested your ability to work out word problems over your knowledge of the material.

3.0
5.0
LING110
Aug 23, 2014

Hardest multiple choice exams imaginable. Lots of material that goes off in all directions, including the way the mouth makes sounds, and the symbols for those sounds. It's a hodgepodge of all kinds of stuff, and memorizing the material won't cut it. You need to understand it and apply it in the exam. Very tough. You've been warned.

2.0
3.0
LING200
Nov 7, 2014

not respected students' work

2.0
5.0
LING110
Dec 3, 2014

Hardest final exam i've ever taken so far at SFU

4.0
3.0
LING110
Grade: B-
Dec 5, 2014

This prof loves the material. His multiple choice questions are very hard and you have to study a lot for this class. If you do not want to go on with linguistics I wouldnt recommend this class. There are other ones which are easier...

5.0
4.0
LING104
Grade: B+
Feb 24, 2015

He was simply fantastic. He was engaging with the class, deeply interested in the material and offered continual help. The subject matter wasn't for everyone but I have taken what he taught into real life context. It's a hard class and there is a lot of material but i thoroughly valued my experience with him.

5.0
3.0
LING110
Mar 5, 2015

Really great- he explained everything clearly, was very helpful answering questions, and made some of the more boring material interesting.

5.0
4.0
LING362
Grade: A-
Aug 22, 2015

Really good at getting the material across. Just don't take if you're looking for an easy credit. For LING362 he expects a lot out of you.

5.0
3.0
110
Grade: A-
Sep 11, 2015

He is really a good professor, but his exams are not easy. You don't need to attend his class every time cause he posted videos on canvas. Try to organize his notes and ask him when you get confused, you can get good marks.

4.0
3.0
LING110
Dec 3, 2015

Really recommend this class. Wish I'd taken the grammar class with him too. He records lectures so it's really helpful for review. Also gives midterms back; great for review. Best prof I had this semester. Makes the long lectures less boring too. Also has a lot of office hours for help. Will make sure everything is fair for his students.

4.0
3.0
LING362
Grade: B-
Dec 14, 2015

He seems tough and unfriendly but if you are willing to stop by his office hours often, you will find him helpful. This course does not require too much of work in general. English is not my first language and I did not study much for the MT, still I got a B-. Now I am able to speak in front of the class. I love it!

2.0
5.0
LING200
Dec 16, 2015

dont have to go to class. I learn by myself, the score was even higher than go to lec. study at home is more efficiency. dont have to look at book just the PPT.

2.0
5.0
LING200
Jan 12, 2016

dont take it. his exam is harder than other teachers who have ever tought ling200

5.0
4.0
LING100
Grade: A
Mar 20, 2016

Was not looking forward to this class since it was 3 hours but he has made things so interesting right from the beginning! Lectures are super clear and slides are easy to understand. Quizzes are reasonable, tests are a bit tough but nothing out of the ordinary. His review assignments and slides are great. Overall, will do his best to help you pass

2.0
5.0
LING100
Grade: C+
Apr 13, 2016

Took this class as it sounded very interesting. Was excited to learn, but by exam week I was regretting taking this course. Slides were very informative, tests looked like they were from a 400 level course. Don't take this class if you're looking for an elective. If you arent in Linguistics (I am a bus student) then stay away.

5.0
3.0
LING110
Nov 2, 2016
Would take again

Engaging, funny and caring. He gives you everything you need to pass, responds to e-mails and will always help you in office hours. He gives you everything you need to get a good grade but you have to work for it

Inspirational
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
2.0
5.0
LING110
Grade: B-
Dec 1, 2016
Wouldn't take again

so hard....

Skip class? You won't pass.
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
TEST HEAVY
5.0
4.0
LING110
Grade: B+
Jan 30, 2017
Would take again

Cliff is a great prof! His passion for linguistics is clear in his interactive lectures. He is very caring and he makes each class interesting. However, this is not a "gpa booster" class. He is a fair but tough marker - you need a thorough understanding of the material to do well. Would recommend if you're passionate about linguistics.

Amazing lectures
Caring
1.0
1.0
LING110
Grade: A-
Feb 28, 2017
Wouldn't take again

I'm a ling major and I took this class in my last semester for an LD credit I needed. Much of Cliff's theories seemed incorrect. I was taught very contradictory things in this class than I had learned in 200, and 300 level classes. Go to class and memorize his opinion and you'll do fine, but expect to learn drastically different things elsewhere.

4.0
4.0
LING100
Grade: B+
May 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Lectures were long but he's super engaging. Quizzes were pretty nasty, but tests were WAY worse, like they really did batter me. Online quizzes were decent but super specific. He does a great job of explaining thing, is very passionate about ling, and goes over quizzes/tests well. Overall decent class, just pls pls pls be prepared for testing.

Gives good feedback
2.0
5.0
LING100
Aug 8, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Don't take this course with this professor if you want to boost your GPA

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
TEST HEAVY
4.0
4.0
LING362
Grade: C+
Sep 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

This is a great class that teaches valuable public speaking, and presentation skills. Professor gives specific feedback, marks harshly. Do something wrong and will be penalized. Sometimes intimidating. His lecture slides are basically his speech ( good/ bad?). But each presentation is 2030% of your grade. DO NOT go over time. PRACTICE A LOT.

Tough Grader
Gives good feedback
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
4.0
LING362
Jul 12, 2018
Would take again

if you like public speaking/want to be an esl teacher, you should take LING 362 with him (in fact, he is the only one who teaches LING 362 at sfu). he is definitely a tough grader and you would get your points deducted even for the very tiny things. so, MAKE SURE to follow his instructions, visit his office hours, and put as much effort as you can

Tough Grader
Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
5.0
LING282W
Grade: C+
Dec 2, 2018
Wouldn't take again

The course is too painful. What cliff does is more or less what we call a destruction of humanity. I went to every single office hr to get help but he seems to see no improvement of you. It is a course to help you improve your writing skills, but Cliff used it to destroy your self-esteem on writing academic papers. Thank you for your help btw!

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
4.0
3.0
LING282
Grade: B
Dec 3, 2018
Would take again

Cliff is a great professor. He's organized on canvas, records all of his lectures incase you miss one, and is readily accessible for help outside of class. I do think that visiting him in his office hours are extremely beneficial, especially for a writing class.

Tough Grader
Gives good feedback
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
5.0
4.0
D100
Grade: B
Dec 20, 2018
Would take again

Cliff is a tough grader but it is evident he really cares about his students. Make sure you pay attention and ask questions! He is very friendly one-on-one so don't be afraid to see him during his office hours.

Gives good feedback
Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
LING360
Apr 18, 2019
Wouldn't take again

His slides are too hard to follow - literally paragraphs. There is ALOT of material in this course but we only got tested on random select topics. There is are 2 midterms (one for each textbook), a term paper, and a final presentation. The presentation is recorded and marked very harshly. Good luck if you take a class with him..

Get ready to read
Tough grader
4.0
4.0
LING220
Grade: B
Sep 8, 2019
Would take again

Great professor but really makes you work for a good mark. Prepare to practice IPA symbols and syntax trees until you've drilled them into your brain device

Lots of homework
Amazing lectures
Tough grader
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

62%

Textbook Required

78%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 18 grades
Most common grades:
A- (4)
B- (3)
B+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(6)C(3)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 20 reported grades
A-: 4
B-: 3
B+: 3
C+: 3
Common Tags
Tough Grader (5)
Gives good feedback (4)
Amazing lectures (3)
Skip class? You won't pass. (3)
TEST HEAVY (3)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (2)
Get ready to read (2)
Tough grader (2)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.63 avg change
Aug
Sep
Jul
Dec
Apr
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

110

5.0

(1)

LING362363

5.0

(1)

LING200GRMMR

5.0

(1)

LING104

5.0

(1)

LING362

4.3

(6)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

LINGUISTICS100

5.0

LIN100

5.0

LING

5.0

LING200GRMMR

5.0

LING282W

5.0

Similar Professors