This is Connie's first semester teaching in Canada, however, her class design is very poor. Her grading scheme was inaccurate and changed throughout the semester, assignments do not provide good instructions, and exam questions do not reflect the content she discusses in class.

Connie was super lovely, however, she was the most disorganized prof I have ever had and this made the course way more challenging than it should ever be. I had no idea when things were due because she seemingly picked random dates off a calendar. Projects were due on days that we didn't have lectures or tutorials and late projects get a zero.

Worst class I have ever taken and the content wasn't even hard. Do yourself a favour and take 237 later if Connie is your only choice.

she is a nice person, but as a professor, the worst I have had at SFU, she is very unorganized, her lectures are extremely boring, and she doesn't help in any way to make them more interesting. All her assignment have horrible instructions, that leads to her having to clarify the instructions and make them clearer through announcements and emails.

She backloaded the course which sucked. First half only had a couple minor assignments. Second half had 3 major assignments, 2 minor ones and a presentation. Connie seems to be a nice person but actually is not very accommodating. This was particularly disheartening to during a pandemic.

connie is a really sweet and caring person, however, her lectures are the worst. she needs to be more organised and reduce the course load because there is just so many components and most of it, you have to figure it out by yourself. although, she's an amazing person, would not recommend taking it with her because she the worst lecturer.

Oh, where do I start? Boring lectures, rambles a lot, not that accessible, unwilling to accommodate to the online learning environment, super vague and confusing assignment criteria, exams and lectures do not match, expects too much for a first year course. She's a nice person, but unfortunately not a good professor at all. Avoid if you can.

Lectures were dry and hard to follow bc she rambles. Would not have attended if it wasnt mandatory as It felt like a waste of time. Assignment heavy with unclear instructions. Some assignments are tedious that is worth little at the end. Nice person but is not accommodating to students and found her condescending at times. Unclear exam expectation

Lots of work and confusing lectures and assignments. The instruction made this class harder than it needed to be as we couldnt get clarification on what was expected of us on assignments or further explanation of class material when it was confusing.

Connie's lectures are extremely dry, disorganized and it becomes very hard to follow along. Her teaching style made the class way harder than it needed to be as expectations were not clearly explained regarding assignments or exams. Do yourself a favour and take this class with a different prof!

Very confusing lectures, no organization and she always goes over the time allotted for every lecture. Assignments were somewhat easy; however, she likes to give a lot of assignments in a short period of time. Wish she would give more clarity throughout the course. Also, I wasted so much money on a textbook I never used.

the last review was her, she quoted her self from lecture

Connie seemed like she had no clue what she was doing yet maintained a huge ego. She didn't even understand her own grading rubric and would change the format as she went. Classes were extremely boring and unorganized. A lot of the material she taught is out-of-date and irrelevant. Overall her class was a terrible experience, would not recommend.

Very disorganized during lectures, and sometimes rambles/strays away from the topic + messy writing. Always contradicting herself on assignment rubrics and due dates. She knows her stuff, but her delivery of the course makes it difficult for students to grasp that knowledge. Her exam questions are based more on what she says than her actual notes.

Very disorganized and confusing class. No one knows what's going on and even TAs agree that assignment rubrics are confusing. Course material is not hard whatsoever but assignments are hardly related to what we learn in this class. Avoid Connie unless you want to stare at the assignment criterias for hours and still not know how to start.

Do not take a class with Connie! She just doesn't know how to teach, her lectures are very disorganized, which makes it hard to learn anything. The course material is not difficult, but the way Connie teaches it makes it much more confusing than it needs to be.

Connie is very disorganized. She just read off the slides and start ranting about everything else, without any contribution to the material. Her assignments never align with the instructions. Everything is very vague. Most of the exams are on the internet so basically everyone took advantage of it. Time-consuming assignments, only worth a few %.

Grading was very late and final exam was poorly written. Id advise taking this course with a different professor.

Extremely disorganized class. Grading rubrics are not clear whatsoever so no one knows how to even complete the assignments. Connie also samples her exams from quizlets so everyone cheated and brought up the average. Avoid Connie.

Connie seems nice enough but she's just not fit for teaching. Her lectures are very disorganized and half the time she just rambles about stuff and it's hard to even recognize what is testable and what is just her getting distracted. The course material itself isn't too difficult but the course expectations are very unclear.

Rambles on and on. No clear point of lectures. Pointless class, do not take if it isn't absolutely mandatory.

Connie although is a good person outside of her course. The amount of ego she maintained was pressuring. The course itself is supposed to be engrossing; however her lecture presentation is very poor and disorganized. You could feel that she tries to improve some aspects of it, but her definitions of fairness are so vague that she ends up unfair.

This course is traumatizing because it teaches you to think the way Connie thinks, her exams are structured the way where you opinion could lead you failing this course as questions are mostly opinion based.

If I could give this course a 0, I would. The course is a mess, just like the person teaching it.

Awful! Connie deserves 0 stars. The lectures were useless, but you have to attend them to get participation marks. My TA was not too bad, but Connie was a nightmare. MyITLab is trash (takes 4 hours to complete an assignment) and all the assignments are only worth 5% of your overall. AVOID AT ALL COSTS! Assignment 2 was very strictly graded. AVOID!

If you've never felt lost in life before, this class will change that. A complete blur of disarray and chaos, rambles of words disguised as "lectures", and multi-hour lengthy assignments create an atmosphere that lacks the motivation to contribute anything more than the bare minimum for this course. if options arise, pick them instead of Connie.

Connie is sweet, but I found her lectures to be useless. To sum it up, she was very inconsistent and confusing in both teaching and grading. Never have I seen such an unengaged class. You only have to do the Microsoft office lessons through MyITLab to pass this class. All the exam questions can be found directly from Quizlet.

Connie Liu is not fit to teach project management. She routinely assigns major assignments with no grading criteria whatsoever. That aside, even despite having no real rubric for grading for most assignments, she also gives very rude, often sarcastic, and unclear feedback.

I would say she really didn't teach anything. We made paper airplanes during class... this class was a waste of time. I'd say take this class with someone else if possible.

Connie didn't provide much support when it came to the assignment. If I could take this course again, I would choose a different professor.

Connie's teaching styles made this course unenjoyable, useless, and difficult. She does not give instructions for assignments (even ones that are 20% of your grade), provides vague feedback with no meaning, and is disorganized. Lectures involved making paper airplanes and building spaghetti towers (irrelevant and did not contribute to my learning)

Reads off slides all lecture, but puts pop quizzes that were inaccessible from outside of class. The final exam was very unrelated to the material she suggested we study.

Connie makes BUS 361 feel like a 4 credit course. The group work itself requires about 8 hours a week of work and even more if you get stuck with a bad group. Her weekly assignments and readings take another 5-8 hours. I have had 4 credit courses that felt like a breeze compared to BUS 361. Connies unclear grading criteria does not help either.

Very hard to follow and lacks effective teaching skills. Big group project so you need to hope you get a good group. Final exam felt completely unrelated to the course material and exam questions were worded very poorly, leaving questions open to different interpretations. Overall, you're not going to get your money's worth with this professor.

The reviews are right overall.

Unclear assignments, vague and inconsistent grading schemes, and useless lectures. Not only that, she can barely speak English, so if you have any questions whatsoever, she will not help you. Overall, speaking from personal experience she is arguably the worst prof in Beedie.

Unorganized lectures, course structure, and marking. Will often not read slides and tell students to read them because reading the slides "are not worth her time." Overall bad prof in all ways if you can avoid her do it, but if not you'll just have a bad experience.

Overall bad prof. Lectures have no connections with each other, she does not seem to care about students and their grades, and the heavy Chinese accent makes all of it even worse (Still wonder how an international student like myself can speak better English than the prof). Avoid at all costs.

The professor is clearly inadequate for the course and needs extra brushing up on IT standards. She uses html buttons with COMIC SANS that redirect to other buttons in the canvas page (aka useless) Her lectures are worthless, just knowing how to use a computer is enough to pass this class. They teach you microsoft excel and office in big 2024 ffs

I wouldn't like to get lectured a introduction to MIS, paying thousands, for a professor who is just... dissapointing at it

As a chinese, XI XING PING would put her to the sweat shops

absolute cheeks

Dolores Umbridge

If your looking for a class with zero grading criteria, a sassy & unhelpful prof this is the class for you. She doesn't do any teaching in class as she has a reverse class teaching style... I don't mind except for the fact the time in class isn't used well. She designates work to her TA's who aren't upto date with her teachings (or lack thereof).

No clear grading criteria. Reverse lectures, which is fine. She rambles about a lot of nonsense during her lectures so I don't get the point of them. She's condescending and doesn't explain herself clearly. Essentially a self taught class with a grump lady rambling through it. Unfortunately it is a requirement for some concentrations.

This class is a complete disaster. She spends the entire time yelling,complaining and going on irrelevant, bitter rants about everything from students to businesses. She's rude, condescending, and unprofessional. Even her own TA isn't safe,she trashes him behind his back like it's nothing. There's zero teaching, zero learning, and 100% wasted time.

Shes an entertaining lecturer who doesn't go over course content very well, all criteria's are vague. She can be rude and condescending, not a very sympathetic prof to say the least. Avoid her class if you can, sorry for those taking ops management.

This class was horrible. This woman is clearly very bitter about her life and uses “teaching” as an opportunity to be rude, condescending, and disrespectful towards students who are paying to be present. She rambles on about absolutely nothing related to the course and talks down to you. Clearly projecting her inner struggles. Quit teaching

The worst sfu prof. Don't take class with her for the sake of your own sanity.

It seems like most BBA students will end up with Connie as their prof at some point in their degree, which is unfortunate. Connie would frequently assign lengthy presentations and assignments that were not graded, but had to be done to a certain standard because they would be presented in front of your clients whom you are doing the project for.

connie tries and she is nice, but shes an awful prof. You can't follow lectures even if you try to. The tests have random stuff that youve never seen before (3.5+GPA Reviewer). The high score on our MT was 86%, which tells you how much people are understanding. Best advice, go to office hours so she thinks you care, it helps. Avoid if possible.

Prior to taking Connies 237 class I had not payed much attention to rate my prof, I will now be using it every time I pick courses. When younger students for advice my advice at networking events it will be to avoid Connie in all capacities. She is very hard to understand not just from an accent standpoint but her scatterbrained lecture.

On thursday when I had this class I never wore my seatbelt .... Dont take it with her if you value your life and sanity. Classes are incomprehensible.I learned Chinese while trying to do MIS concepts. Midterms are completly on gods good graces.Question wording is horrific.The second half of the course will be on the first midterm.

I would not recommend it - The exams are so vague and out of place. They can be from anywhere.

She is a terrible prof that refuses to take feedback. She assigns so many assignments that take forever to do but they're all worth nothing. Her tests are terrible and her lectures aren't good either but every class she complains how no one goes to her course. I do not recommend taking any course with her.

The MT and Final will have random stuff you've never seen no matter what you study, and doing well will feel on them is gonna be a contest of who guesses better. To prove my point, the 25th and 75th percentile were sperated by less then 10%, and class high was 86%.The course is a roller-coaster, and not in a good way. avoid if you value ur sanity.

Do not take it with her if you value your sanity.

connie is the worst prof ive ever had. confusing lectures, unclear grading, typos absolutely everywhere in everything. Everyone in my section could tell she grades and writes emails using AI. Her exams are a joke, tons of random stuff that wasn't in the lecture or the textbook. above curve is more luck then effort. AVOID if you value your GPA!

Genuinely don't know how she still has her job.