2.7

Corbin Fowler

Philosophy - Edinboro University

2.7
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
20%
Would Retake
119
Reviews
2.7
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
2.5
Helpful
2.9
Clarity

20%

Would Retake

119

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
119 total ratings

5

26

4

18

3

22

2

21

1

32

What Students Say

Terrible at teaching abstract courses

PHIL311 - 2.0 rating

He shows a very biased opinion in not only his lectures but on the actual exams

10701 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

50%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

83% confidence
Based on 11 grades
Most common grades:
B (4)
Not_Sure_Yet (2)
C (2)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(4)C(4)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 15 reported grades
B: 4
Not_Sure_Yet: 2
C: 2
Not sure yet: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (4)
Skip class? You won't pass. (3)
Get ready to read (2)
GROUP PROJECTS (2)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
Hilarious (1)
Inspirational (1)
TEST HEAVY (1)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.66 avg change
Oct
Dec
Dec
Jan
Apr
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHILINTRO

5.0

(1)

DEATH

5.0

(2)

PHI364240

5.0

(1)

PHIL202346

5.0

(1)

WESTMORALITY

5.0

(1)
+39 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHILOSOPHY240

5.0

PHIL100

5.0

PHI200

4.3

10701

4.0

EH

4.0

Reviews (118)
5.0
2.0
PHIL364
Oct 24, 2002

Lots of discussions; he's a very sensitive guy; loved the class.

5.0
3.0
PHIL251
Dec 7, 2002

Semi easy class, a lot of class discussion.

3.0
2.0
PHIL251
Dec 11, 2002

lots of discussion. lots of reading. good course

1.0
5.0
PHIL101
Dec 11, 2002

He even thinks his own book on philosophy does this guy think he is PLATO.

5.0
2.0
PH101
Dec 11, 2002

No Comments

2.0
1.0
PHILOSOPHY
Dec 11, 2002

lazy professor - shows videos more than he teaches

2.0
3.0
PH251
Dec 12, 2002

too many films, little lecture. hard to tell what would be on test

4.0
2.0
PHIL
Dec 13, 2002

Mean at first but when he gets to know you very nice, interesting class/great.

4.0
3.0
PH251
Dec 13, 2002

really makes you think!!!

5.0
1.0
PHIL
Jan 16, 2003

very nice but take time to talk with him it really makes a difference!

5.0
1.0
INTROPHIL
Apr 22, 2003

He is a great professor. I had him fall 02 semester. Some people mistake him for being mean but he definitely isn't. He has a great (but different) sense of humor.

1.0
3.0
PHIL200
May 3, 2003

No Comments

5.0
2.0
PHIL
Jul 7, 2003

one of my best classes

2.0
3.0
INTRO
Jul 14, 2003

very very very boring

1.0
5.0
PHILOSOPHY
Sep 17, 2003

i hate fowler

4.0
3.0
PHILOSOPHY
Sep 23, 2003

This class is very cool. I went thinking it would suck, but now I see that it is very awesome.

2.0
3.0
PHI
Oct 24, 2003

Good class, ok topics, but hope you have his point of view, otherwise forget the tests.

1.0
3.0
PHIL101
Nov 7, 2003

No Comments

3.0
2.0
PHILOSOPHY
Nov 19, 2003

Kind of a ****, but in a funny way...he tests only on chapters, which are 8-10 pages long, so u never have to go to class....i don't and i have a b.

5.0
3.0
PHILINTRO
Dec 2, 2003

This teacher will open your mind and make you think outside the box. Loved his class!

5.0
3.0
PHILOSOPHY
Dec 3, 2003

I thought this was going to be a boring class, but it wasn't. He uses lots of videos and has lots of great discussions of relevant topics. I thoroughly loved this class!

4.0
3.0
PHIL
Dec 12, 2003

Classes are best when there is lively discussion. Dr. Fowler moderates well!

4.0
1.0
MORALISS
Dec 18, 2003

If you read his book, the class is easy! I dont know why people say he is hard! i hardly went to class and still got an A!! Just read the material and the tests will be easy~!

5.0
1.0
PHIL240
Dec 23, 2003

Intro to Moral Issues. Very funny and sarcastic professor. Very intelligent, he will make you think about whatever he has to say. A cool class.

1.0
4.0
EH
Apr 12, 2004

waaaaaaaaaaaaayyy too into himself. if you don't have his point of few you're done for. gotta love how he puts "dr, corbin fowler believes" questions on the test right next to all the REAL philospohers

5.0
1.0
RELIGION
Apr 28, 2004

VERY EASY!!!! You MUST read the material. But that's it.....and you will get an A on the tests for sure. Very nice guy, doesn't take attendence either!!

5.0
3.0
PHIL
May 3, 2004

I thought his class was great. You have to read though. Essay tests are the best but make sure you write a lot.

5.0
1.0
RELIGION
May 9, 2004

His classes are a pice of cake. You will pass every test. His tests are only 20-25 questions long. An easy A. Go for it!!!! Doesn't take attendance either

4.0
1.0
RELIGION
May 21, 2004

easy class. almost too easy but you learn a lot too. very friendly to talk to. you will definitely have fun and get an A

1.0
4.0
PHIL251
Jul 12, 2004

Horrible, I paid for him to teach me, and I ended up reading books & teaching myself. His tests suck b/c it's all sarcastic and he changes everything into his own twisted view. This 200 level course was worse than my upperlevel ones!

5.0
1.0
DEATH
Sep 19, 2004

awesome professor. easy class structure. does not take attendence!! but you will learn a LOT from his videos, trust me.

3.0
3.0
PHIL101
Oct 6, 2004

he is a poor teacher. teaches from his point of view. doesnt give enough background on christianity when he bashes it. is relatively fair in class. gives everyone a chance to speak.

2.0
4.0
PHIL200
Oct 20, 2004

It's basically a class about himself and his views. Tests are based on things he doesn't even go over. I would not recommend him.

5.0
2.0
PHI364240
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Oct 24, 2004

I've taken two classes with him, and I think that he is a great professor. A lot of people don't agree with what he has to say but I think that he is very intelligent and can argue his point with credible information. Very sarcastic but that's what made the classes fun.

2.0
4.0
PHI200
Nov 2, 2004

Fowler Says on Tests is ridiculous. Hard class and very boring unless you are a die hard philosopher. Not RECOMMENDED.

5.0
1.0
DEATH
Nov 13, 2004

Very enlightening!! Fowler gives it to you straight up. Easy tests and you will learn a LOT. Very smart guy.

4.0
1.0
MORALISSUES
Dec 6, 2004

A lot of his class is about his views and opinions which is a bit annoying but his class is extremely easy. Just read his book and you're good to go. Gives everyone a chance to put in their 2 cents.

3.0
3.0
VALUES
Jan 21, 2005

Takes some warming up, but after that he’s great and you see that his opinions are to help you learn about the various philosophical ideas, not to get you involved in political issues. *he needs to tell the class this* Overall very good and I was impressed with his clothing choices.

5.0
1.0
RELIGION
Jan 27, 2005

Dont listen to others, truly excellent teacher and very smart!! Knows what he is talking about. He will truly enlighten your mind. Lots of videos keep the class simple, doesnt take attendance, the way it should be.

4.0
2.0
PHIL364
Feb 27, 2005

Love it, it's thoughtful and worthwhile, I like it, and the sex videos are pretty cool too.

5.0
2.0
PHIL202346
Apr 5, 2005

No Comments

1.0
5.0
PHIL200
Apr 25, 2005

Fowler is the WORST test giver EVER!! Dont bother studying it is impossible. He isnt that bad of a teacher, but you will not do good. TAKE SOMEONE ELSE!!!

1.0
5.0
PHIL200
Grade: A+
Apr 25, 2005

No Comments

5.0
2.0
WESTMORALITY
May 3, 2005

Great discussion class, it was extremely interesting. Dr. Fowler is a really nice intelligent guy, who gives everyone a chance to speak. The tests are hard, ONLY if you don't read the books designated for the class. So what should you do? Read the books! Sweet class.

1.0
5.0
PHILOSOPHY
May 19, 2005

No Comments

5.0
1.0
RELIGION
May 26, 2005

very intelligent man. this guy knows his stuff folks. it's refreshing to see him stand up for what he believes in. he will let you know his opinion on any issue. the classes are very easy and relaxed. if you want to, you will learn a lot about life from this guy....

1.0
5.0
MORALISSUES
Grade: B
Aug 29, 2005

I found him to be an awful teacher!!! You will never pass a test, don't even try studying!

1.0
4.0
PHIL200
Sep 6, 2005

Bad teacher

3.0
1.0
RLGNNIETZSCHE
Sep 27, 2005

Fowler's smart, very literate, and is rhetorically strong, but he's not very analytic. I'm pretty sure that he believes that there are no answers. He never struct me as being as historically strong as other members of the dept., but for life philosophy, he's accessible and involving. I hate his discussions, though... he lets people get away with anything.

3.0
2.0
PHILOSOPHY
Oct 17, 2005

No Comments

5.0
1.0
MANY
Grade: A-
Oct 21, 2005

very intelligent and funny guy!! it takes a while to get used to his calm personality, but overall he is an awesome professor and i have taken him for MANY classes. fair grader and very easy classes. doesn't take attendence either....sweet!!

1.0
5.0
PHILOSOPHY240
Oct 26, 2005

not good

3.0
4.0
PHIL200
Nov 14, 2005

I ablsolutely do NOT recommend this professor. His tests are pretty hard. The notes you take in class and the material covered do not match up with what is on the test. Very opinionated on religion. You have to know what all of his beliefs and opinions are

4.0
1.0
MANY
Nov 18, 2005

Excellent Professor. Knows what he talks about. Listen to him and you will come away a changed person!!

5.0
1.0
RELIGION
Nov 20, 2005

very educated man. makes class interesting and its also pretty easy.

4.0
3.0
MORALISSUES
Dec 12, 2005

I think he's very smart. So does he. If you can deal with the self-centeredness, he is a very good professor; I learned a lot.

1.0
5.0
PHILOSOPHY
Dec 13, 2005

horrible teacher. very un animated, hard to stay awake. makes fun of you if your not doing well in the class. AVOID AT ALL COSTS

2.0
3.0
PHILOSOPHY251
Dec 13, 2005

There is no question that Dr. Fowler is a knowledgeable man. He seems to be quite flexible with what the students say. However, he does not teach! He mostly just sits in his chair and watches the class debate about things. Since he is the professor, he should teach so that you can learn from him. Plus, he does not give advanced notice of exams.

2.0
4.0
INTROTOPHIL
Apr 11, 2006

Class was ridiculous. If you didn't think how he wanted then you were screwed. I would rather rip my eyelashes out then take another class with him.

4.0
3.0
PHIL240
May 9, 2006

decently difficult class. Tests aren't difficult if you read the book like 15 times. The book is all his opinions, so if you don't want to read about another persons opinion, DON'T TAKE. He does offend some people with his views, but it's a good class... if your interesting in philosophy.

2.0
5.0
PHIL200
Oct 26, 2006

He is a **** plain and simple.. Im honest he is a pompus ****

1.0
5.0
PHIL200
Nov 1, 2006

Fowler Sucks

1.0
3.0
PHIL240
Jan 31, 2007

A**hole... Does he teach? I didn't learn a thing.... videos make his class.... complete waste of time....

2.0
3.0
PHIL306
Mar 6, 2007

For the love of humanity, do not take his Philosophy of Harry Potter class!!! You will NOT talk about Harry Potter!! Instead you'll talk about just plain philosophy, Dick Cheney, myths, and Star Wars. If you want Harry Potter, take Popular Literature. In this class you're luck if Harry Potter is mentioned.

3.0
3.0
PHIL320
Apr 11, 2007

No Comments

4.0
3.0
PHIL200
Apr 20, 2007

The reviews are mixed on Professor Fowler; however I liked him. If you read the material and are willing to participate in class, this class should be easy. Just make sure you start reading the two books he assigns at the VERY beginning of the semester, otherwise you might not have time to finish them.

5.0
1.0
PHIL364
Jul 11, 2007

I think Fowler is an excellent Proffessor. I loved his class. It was interesting and easy to pass. I think the other comments are very misleading.

2.0
3.0
PHIL240
Dec 26, 2007

His class was completely rediculous....All he talked about was politics and his nonbelief in God... His tests raley kept to the text and most questions were opinion based.. I couldnt stand his method of teaching and wouldnt take him again unless completely nessicary.

3.0
3.0
PHIL0
Feb 18, 2008

We watch a lot of movies. The class is not as interesting as I thought it would be. It is the Harry Potter class.

1.0
5.0
INTROPHIL
Feb 21, 2008

Possibly the wost class I've had the displeasure of paying for.He mostly preaches his views, bashes Christianity. The exams are based on his views and opinions. Waste of time, waste of money. If you have to take a philosophy class, find a different Professor.

1.0
4.0
PHIL101
Mar 25, 2008

Intro to Philosophy. Worst teacher ever. Asked students for their opinion, then patronized them for not having one as passionate as his. I stopped going to class after a few weeks. All politics here, don't take the class if you're shy,either.

3.0
1.0
PHIL101
Apr 25, 2008

Condescending, arrogant, self-aggrandizing, self-righteous, self-absorbed BIGOT. When questioned or critiqued, Fowler dissolves any dialogue with his students by spouting witty one-liners, and quotes from Jesus torn out of context. Not a philosopher, not a teacher. Avoid.

2.0
2.0
PHILHP
Apr 25, 2008

Ponder this short Haiku: Pompous, Christ hater question and be scowled upon such sly deception

2.0
1.0
PHILPHIL
Apr 25, 2008

No Comments

3.0
3.0
PHIL200
May 7, 2008

Nice guy, very opinionated.

2.0
4.0
PHIL200
Jul 12, 2008

useless class.. really boring but if you must take it then this guy was ok.. he's nice but a little opinionated.. read the books and show up for class and you'll be fine..

4.0
2.0
PHIL0000
Jul 27, 2008

I've had Fowler for multiple classes and I love the guy. He makes you think, which I know might be scary for some people, but its part of being a college student. Read, give your opinion and write down whatever he puts on the board and you'll do fine. He often gives study guides with exactly he concepts you need to know. Would easily take him again

1.0
1.0
PHIL111
Mar 23, 2009

An idiot who taught us about himself and his views. We didn't learn any basic concepts or movements in his intro class. Nothing about nihilism, objectivism, surrealism, nothing at all.

4.0
3.0
PHIL200
Sep 26, 2009

I think that people are giving him too hard a time. It's a philosophy class. It's not going to be all awesome ideas about God or anything. The idea of philosophy is to make you think. If you don't want to think and you are too hard headed to listen to other people's opinions, don't take the class. I think he's a great professor. Hilarious.

4.0
4.0
PHIL311
Jan 10, 2010

Keep up with the reading or you'll never make it out alive. Can be difficult at times, tests are easy if you read, and he is funny and easy to talk to.

1.0
5.0
PHI200
May 9, 2010

Dr. Fowler is the worst professor i ever had. We only learn about what he thinks about philosophy. The reading packet only consist of essays he wrote for the most part. We don't learn about any opposing views. He tries to brainwash you and shove his beliefs down your throat. If your beliefs differ from his he will go after you in class. AVOID DR. F

1.0
5.0
PHIL200
Aug 14, 2010

horrible professor

2.0
5.0
PHIL240
Nov 15, 2010

He's a terrible professor. No was to study for his tests. It's just his opionion

3.0
4.0
PHIL240
Nov 17, 2010

The most distressing issue with this class is not that it is completely boring with no opportunity to give your opinion (It is. Completely ), It is the fact that the vocabulary used by the professor is completely unprofessional and disrespectful. Asking us if we're "retarded" is out of line and beyond inappropriate for an educator.

2.0
1.0
PHIL240
Dec 15, 2010

Worst educator ever. Very unprofessional and lazy. He likes to degrade students who disagree with him. I feel his only goal in this class is to persuade people America is bad and vote for the Green party. His class is more political than anything. He thinks he has one up on everyone with his doctorate in Philosophy. Wow

3.0
1.0
PHIL200
Jun 10, 2011

I got the impression that he was luring us into battle against his reality. I withdrew because I wasn't about to fight an insignificant battle and lose on his ground, the odds are stacked against. And, what he's fighting for isn't valid...He wants to prove he's right...as far from philosophy as anyone could imagine.

3.0
3.0
PHIL364
Oct 6, 2011

I came to this class expecting to be introduced to new ideas. Nothing has struck me in this class as particularly philosophically moving. He likes to bring politics into areas where they don't belong and yes, the tests will contain his commentary on established ideas. Would not take again. I have taken far better PHIL courses before.

1.0
5.0
PHIL100
Nov 3, 2011

If you do not like his philosophy, you will fail. his first test, I thought, was worded for each individual opinion. I gave my opinion and I failed. He made it known that there were 4 people in my class that failed the test and he called us idiots for not reading. Fowler, to this day, is the worst professor I have ever taken.

1.0
5.0
PHIL306
Nov 8, 2011

Fowler is the worst Prof I've had in four years. He flaunts the kids he likes and degrades those having a hard time in class. He teaches anything BUT the topic he is suppose to. It's all about his politcal and religious views. It was suppose to be HARRY POTTER. I ended up dropping the class because I couldn't take any more. STAY AWAY FROM FOWLER.

4.0
3.0
PHIL240
Dec 10, 2011

These comments are definitely too harsh. He is a great professor, really funny, easy to talk to and you always get out early. Tests are short but pretty impossible to get an A. Just study the assigned reading before the test and you will pass.

3.0
4.0
PHIL364
Dec 15, 2011

The majority of this class was discussion which often ended up far off topic and usually ended thirty minutes early. Two books and a packet that he had written himself are the course materials. Tests are hard but not impossible.

3.0
3.0
PHIL364
Feb 8, 2012

I didn't think he would be all that bad at first. Coming from a Philosophy Major, I found his teaching style rather lazy and opinionated. The books were great, in fact, I had previously read both of them and still managed to get D's on my exams. He also likes to start class 10 minutes early and ends it 20-30 mins early. I didn't learn much.

4.0
1.0
PHIL420
Apr 22, 2013

Best professor I've had. He can be opinionated at times, but if you pay attention you will notice that it goes with what he's teaching most of the time and will help you understand better. He's willing to point out that people fail tests and say negative comments on it, but there really is no reason to fail in the first place, so he has a point.

2.0
3.0
PHIL300
Apr 29, 2013

Not a good prof I was a minor in Phil but switched cause the department is too small

3.0
4.0
PHIL200
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Nov 5, 2013

Sit, be quiet, and pay attention. Don't sleep and try to look interested. If you don't read and don't show up to class, he will rip you to shreds and you'll never make it out. This man really does know his stuff, and will be quite entertaining.

3.0
2.0
PHIL240
Grade: B
Nov 20, 2013

He is 100% biased with his own opinions and he does not teach critical thinking nor philosophy. He instead wrote his opinions in his own text for the class and lectures his beliefs. You are then expected to know and understand his opinions for the exams

2.0
4.0
PHIL240
Nov 21, 2013

Lazy, Arrogant, and has no interest in the success of his students. He uses his class to silicate his own beliefs through painfully over worded rhetoric. The text for his class was written by him, which make the exam questions his beliefs. So basically if you disagree with him you are wrong. Bad professor.

4.0
2.0
PHIL200
Jan 21, 2014

Generally, his attendance policy is that if you don't show up, you'll get what you deserve come test tie. Nothing more, which is glorious. I found that, where most people here for GenEd thought he was opinionated, he was actually presenting opinions from philosopher's views (i.e Plato) or using his unique sense of humour. No need to criticize there

1.0
4.0
PHIL200
Jan 23, 2014

Tests are on topics he didn't address and things that aren't in the book. If you don't go to classes you WILL fail the test. Only grades offered are test grades. He doesn't care about students, he's super lazy. If you can help it, avoid him.

1.0
4.0
PHILNIETZSCHE
Feb 10, 2014

A new professor needs to teach this class. He puts in absolutely no effort and relies on the students to teach each other based on assigned readings. His only input is various videos between sections that are completely irrelevant.

5.0
3.0
PHIL240
Grade: B
Aug 28, 2014

Highly recommend taking a course with Fowler. He has a super dry sense of humor so class is entertaining an informative. Just show up and do the reading and you will excel. It was a nice surprise to take a course and only spend $7.50 on a text as well! He loves Harry Potter so read the series from a phil perspective. Trust me.

3.0
3.0
240
Oct 27, 2014

he doesnt really teach we watch video and learn by our self gives no feedback on tests

2.0
1.0
PHIL300
Dec 15, 2014

Luckily, this was not one of his courses where the students have to teach each other (although some times he tried to make it that way). He has trouble staying on topic and also has trouble telling you the same thing that the required reading does, which makes tests impossible to figure out.

3.0
2.0
PHIL240
Feb 18, 2015

He apparently took heed of all these reviews calling him opinionated because he really didn't seem that way to me. Well, he IS opinionated, but it's distilled through humor and vagueness. The main thing I can say is that if you screw up, he will pretty much give you no chance of passing. Insignificant extra credit, very few grading opportunities.

1.0
4.0
PHIL240
Grade: C
Apr 7, 2015

After taking Dr Fowler I will never ever take him again, and will continue to tell people not to. If you're not into learning about his opinion or Harry Potter, don't take this class because that's all you will hear about the entire semester. Every time you ask for help, he'll say "read your syllabus" HORRIBLE "wannabe philosopher"

3.0
3.0
PHIL240
May 13, 2015

As my first philosophy class I didn't know what to really expect, but he wrote the book himself, classes are either lectures or videos (mostly videos, old recorded videos...) and the quizzes consist of questions about his own opinions and arguments made in class, or in the book he wrote. I still don't understand philosophy.

2.0
3.0
PHIL311
Grade: Not sure yet
Sep 8, 2015

I took dr. Fowler for my 300 level world religions class. He is the most unprofessional person to teach this subject. He constantly makes fun of religion and forces his opinion on you instead of giving facts and allowing you to make your own decisions. I'm not even religious and he offended me. Terrible at teaching abstract courses.

2.0
4.0
10701
Oct 16, 2015

He shows a very biased opinion in not only his lectures but on the actual exams. It is clear from the start that he is trying to persuade the class to lean away toward Atheists and Agnostics alike. It is almost immature how the amount of time he puts into bashing Republicans and those with conservative views.

1.0
4.0
PHIL240
Sep 9, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Fowler, where do I begin... Maybe I could start with his obvious biases on topics like religion and politics. He is an obvious Democrat and Agnostic if not Atheist, which is fine but carrying those views and pushing them on students is very unprofessional. Tests are structured around the book he wrote for the course with (see next review)

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
1.0
4.0
PHIL240
Sep 9, 2016
Wouldn't take again

"Dr. Fowler says (blank) about..." If this doesn't show clear bias in material I don't know what does. I guess you could say I signed up for a class that was suppose to introduce me to the field of Philosophy, but instead was greeted with what I'd like to call, "Dr. Corbin Fowler's Views on the World." A class aimed to manipulate students views.

5.0
4.0
FYE106
May 13, 2017
Would take again

I loved Dr. Fowler! Yes, he is opinionated but he is a philosophy/ethics professor so I'm not sure why it's a surprise to some? He makes an effort to connect with his students and gives good feedback. He gave the options to fix mistakes on papers and turn them back in for a better grade. I very much enjoyed his class!

GROUP PROJECTS
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
PH101
Oct 10, 2017
Would take again

Good professor

Inspirational
TEST HEAVY
Amazing lectures
1.0
4.0
PH101
Grade: A
Dec 20, 2017
Wouldn't take again

If you don't think like him you're wrong

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Tests are tough
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
FYE10602
Grade: C
Dec 9, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I found the class to be rather difficult, but that was just because of personal understanding. His teaching is fine, sometimes difficult to follow. If taking the First-Year Experience Harry Potter class, attend the bonus point events, and expect a group project!

Tough Grader
EXTRA CREDIT
GROUP PROJECTS
1.0
4.0
FYE10602
Grade: C+
Dec 13, 2018
Wouldn't take again

he's absolutely horrible does not teach well and grades super hard.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
SO MANY PAPERS
1.0
4.0
PHI200
Grade: Not sure yet
Jan 22, 2019
Wouldn't take again

I had high hopes for this class. He's monotonous and repetitive. I've never been a person to fall asleep in class but this class really puts me to sleep.

Tough Grader
Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
PHI200
Grade: C-
Apr 30, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Hes probably a good philosopher but hes defying not a good professor. Theres no factual things you can study. You have to think like him from his perspective to even do relatively good on his exams. And those are the only grades you get.. this guy is a piece of work. Strongly dont advise taking him ever.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
1.0
3.0
FYE106
Grade: B
Apr 19, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Fowler is known for his participation in Potterfest, having written "The Ravenclaw Chronicles," and passion for Harry Potter. However, he is not as knowledgeable as he claims to be. Between watching the films and speaking about them, he had many of his facts wrong and his ideas were incomprehensible. Class had potential but was a bust.

Get ready to read
Group projects
So many papers
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

50%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

83% confidence
Based on 11 grades
Most common grades:
B (4)
Not_Sure_Yet (2)
C (2)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(4)C(4)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 15 reported grades
B: 4
Not_Sure_Yet: 2
C: 2
Not sure yet: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (4)
Skip class? You won't pass. (3)
Get ready to read (2)
GROUP PROJECTS (2)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
Hilarious (1)
Inspirational (1)
TEST HEAVY (1)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.66 avg change
Oct
Dec
Dec
Jan
Apr
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHILINTRO

5.0

(1)

DEATH

5.0

(2)

PHI364240

5.0

(1)

PHIL202346

5.0

(1)

WESTMORALITY

5.0

(1)
+39 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHILOSOPHY240

5.0

PHIL100

5.0

PHI200

4.3

10701

4.0

EH

4.0

Similar Professors