2.9

Daniela Monaldi

Communication Studies - York University - Keele Campus

2.9
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
41%
Would Retake
97
Reviews
2.9
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
3.0
Helpful
2.8
Clarity

41%

Would Retake

97

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

20

4

23

3

14

2

14

1

26

What Students Say

this class is definitely not easy - she was behind on lectures the entire semester and gave long test reviews that had absolutely nothing to do with the tests

NATS1560 - 2.0 rating

Monaldi is the most PATIENT professor I've seen at York University

NATS1920 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

45%

Textbook Required

15%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 49 grades
Most common grades:
A (18)
A+ (13)
Not sure yet (11)
Grade Distribution
A(31)B(6)C(6)D(3)F(1)A-/B+(4)
Based on 65 reported grades
A: 18
A+: 13
Not sure yet: 11
B: 5
Common Tags
Get ready to read (24)
Tough grader (21)
Lecture heavy (12)
Caring (11)
Participation matters (10)
Accessible outside class (7)
Gives good feedback (6)
Respected (5)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.83 avg change
Feb
Mar
Apr
Oct
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

NATS1830

5.0

(1)

STS3730

5.0

(2)

1920

4.5

(2)

NATS1700

4.0

(2)

STS3970

4.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

STS4785

5.0

NATS

4.0

STS2222

4.0

STS3726

3.5

NATS1700

3.0

Reviews (97)
3.0
3.0
NATS1700
Nov 5, 2005

computers, information, and society

5.0
3.0
NATS1700
Jan 4, 2006

An excellent professor. The material can be a little dry at times, but you cannot blame her for that. The course is an interesting one & she only takes it one step forward with her skills. Very fair tests & good marker as well !!

1.0
3.0
NATS1740
Apr 19, 2006

Could not understand her...very boring...could not show up for her lectures...put me to sleep.

5.0
2.0
NATS1830
Apr 30, 2006

Nice and kind professor, great marker. Intelligent, treats students nicely. Part of the material she lectures on is not one the most exiting (computers and related stuff). The first half of the course is much more interesting, and encompasses physics, astronomy and chemistry. Good course as an elective.

3.0
3.0
STS3770
Jul 14, 2009

Good luck peeps. Shes a nice lady, she tries but man the lectures were soooo hard to understand because you want to fall asleep!! However, i didnt goto class much but still ended up with a good mark.

4.0
1.0
NATS1920
Nov 17, 2009

easy course, tests are straight from the slides, minimal txtbook use. course is straight fwd, she tries to help too. material is kinda boring but easy. final verdict: memorize slides, and a 6credit mark booster this course is...who could say no to a gift like that :D:D:D...PS:science students will DESTROY this course, with our awsome study habits:P

3.0
4.0
NATS1920
Sep 15, 2010

This is from a student who stopped taking math since grade 11! She is soo nice, she is very friendly and very understandable about deadlines! The tests are straight from the slides! Dont need to attend a class to do good on tests! But there is an in class mark which is counted out of 10 :) GOOD LUCK! very nice teacher! will help you asap!

4.0
2.0
NATS1920
Sep 26, 2010

shes very helpful and if you show up class everyday you will get good participation mark shes easy going at giving marks but the material itself is boring

5.0
3.0
STS3730
Jul 29, 2011

Very interesting course and the prof tries her best to summarize readings in easily digestible form. She encourages discussion and you will learn more from these than if you just did the readings and never attended. She's very helpful and will go to great length to explain things. BE SURE you like the subject matter before taking the class.

3.0
5.0
NATS1920
Aug 30, 2011

This was a tough class. The historical aspect of the course is very interesting and engaging, but the mathematical aspect is beyond boring. She doesn't really address the math in depth for people who have difficulty with it.

1.0
5.0
NATS1920
Oct 21, 2012

She is not helpful at all I emailed her a question about an assignment because I didn't understand what she means because English is my 2nd language and she replied to me that i didn't attend class or I was taking a nap in her class and I didn't do my readings while on the other hand I did attend all of her classes and did the readings. Worst class

4.0
1.0
NATS1920
Jun 22, 2013

She's very passionate about this class, which is nice... but it's still very dry material and boring. Warning - if you have a three hour lecture she goes through the entire 3 hours! :( Anyways, her tests and exams were super easy. I hardly showed up to class, reviewed last minute and still ended up with an A. :)

4.0
3.0
NATS1920
Jul 16, 2013

Prof. Monaldi is great. Some of the readings are a bit difficult. Show up to lectures and she clarifies a lot of it. I wouldn't recommend talking during lecture though...

4.0
2.0
1920
Nov 11, 2013

I love professor Monaldi! She genuinely cares about the students doing well and is very helpful. The material is a bit boring however I would still recommend taking her class. She posts everything online which is also very helpful. Love her!

3.0
3.0
NATS1920
Dec 14, 2013

She is a very nice prof, however I can not understand her at all. She has a somewhat thick accent, and no matter how much I try I find myself drifting away because I do not understand her.

1.0
3.0
NATS1920
Apr 11, 2014

She has a difficult accent to listen to or understand,you have to attend class for her pop-quizzes counted for 25% of the mark. The MOST BORING AND DRY MATERIAL IN ANY COURSE I've ever taken, and shes not very helpful, reads off of slides, and came to our exam 50 minutes late because she was stuck in traffic, avoid if you can!

2.0
4.0
NATS
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Apr 27, 2014

Shes one of the nicest profs at York. DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS if you want an easy A there is A LOT of reading. Some of her readings are ridiculous and seem so stupid. She makes you read a 150 page book in addition to other readings from the class a week before the final. Expect to read at least 1000 pages before the final.

1.0
5.0
NATS1920
Grade: D
Jun 5, 2014

THE WORST prof I have ever had at york. For being an elective and a first year class it was too much work and total bs. She is super vague and a hard marker. Material is so boring and textbook she wrote herself is hard to read and get through! DO NOT TAKE!

4.0
2.0
NATS1920
Jul 9, 2014

While I do agree with everyone about the material being boring at times (obviously the history of math will be) she is very nice and helpful, so long as you seek help and guidance. IF you do your homework and attend class, like all other courses, you will do well... that simple! She leaves it in the students hands and rewards those who work hard.

4.0
3.0
STS3970
Jul 28, 2014

Professor Monaldi is an overall nice professor and easy to approach. ALOT of readings though in her class and it is not something you can leave at the last minute. She marks fairly and if you concentrate you can finish an assignment in one day. I wouldn't mind taking another class with her.

3.0
1.0
NATS1560
Mar 18, 2015

She has a bit of an accent which might bother some but I had no issues with it. Interesting subject and reading material is palatable (pun intended). Topics can be interesting. Didn't have much control over class in terms of order. You have to attend classes and read the material (even a once over atleast) and you'll munch your way to an A easy.

4.0
2.0
NATS1560
May 26, 2015

She is extremely monotone and disorganized with how she sets up the class and group assignments (literally calls each of the 200+ students' names). HOWEVER, the course is easy if you keep up and do the readings. Group assignments were horrible but to no fault of her own. If you can take initiative with the readings you don't need to go to class.

4.0
1.0
NATS1920
May 29, 2015

She's a great lecturer, actually learnt something interesting. 1010 would recommend. If you attend all the lectures you don't actually have to read her textbook!!!

5.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A-
Aug 20, 2015

She is the most considerate amazing prof. She actually cares about her students and wants her students to do well.

5.0
1.0
NATS1920
Grade: A+
Sep 13, 2015

Loved her lectures to bits, only class I attended all the classes!! She's extremely helpful but make sure you don't miss a quiz and she also gives extra credit assignments during the year for those who want to get a better overall grade!

4.0
1.0
NATS1920
Grade: A+
Apr 7, 2016

Boring as crap but an easy A didn't even need to read the textbook but it helps before a test

5.0
3.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
May 19, 2016

Very amazing lectures, she cares about her students performance, she is willing to help, she is nice and is not a tough grader. Take group projects seriously, do your readings and attend lectures and you would be good

1.0
1.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Jun 23, 2016
Wouldn't take again

I got an A, I only went to lectures when there was group projects or tests. Mondali is not a good lecturer, at 8:30am I just couldn't do it. We were behind syllabus from DAY ONE.. and she had to remove some readings too. The material was very easy, maybe I'm lucky b/c I just skimmed through and did well. Others didn't do so well though.

1.0
5.0
NATS1560
Grade: C+
Jun 28, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Took the 1560 NATS course In my final year and I must say the worst class I have ever took. If you are looking for a easy NATS course where the professor actually cares do not take this course.

5.0
1.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Sep 2, 2016
Would take again

There is some misinformation in this course as well as a lack of information in certain areas of Understanding Food. I still learned a lot though. She is a nice lady but the group projects were horrible.

Skip class? You won't pass.
GROUP PROJECTS
3.0
3.0
NATS1775
Grade: B
Sep 7, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Means well at heart, cares for students, and in person is great. However, the online portion of the class was disorganized and made it hard for the class to keep up with content. However, always quick and helpful with emails if you ever need anything.

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Caring
2.0
5.0
NATS1560
Grade: C
Sep 12, 2016
Wouldn't take again

this class is definitely not easy - she was behind on lectures the entire semester and gave long test reviews that had absolutely nothing to do with the tests. although she is a nice prof, she was very disorganised and the short answer portion of tests was marked differently depending on which ta was grading

GROUP PROJECTS
5.0
3.0
NATS1920
Apr 3, 2017
Would take again

Prof is nice, but the course sucks.

Get ready to read
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
5.0
3.0
NATS1920
Apr 5, 2017
Would take again

Dr. Monaldi is the most PATIENT professor I've seen at York University. Students in my class were an extremely tough crowd, but she was still an interesting and engaging professor. If you have absolutely no background in mathematics, I wouldnt take this course. But if you want to gain a stronger understanding of the history of math/world, take it!

Inspirational
Amazing lectures
Caring
3.0
3.0
NATS1560
Jun 22, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Professor Monaldi is very nice and will help you as best as she can. However, her lectures are very long and boring (she spent 3 classes speaking about one topic) therefore, was behind and had to remove readings. In my opinion, if you read the textbook and look at her lecture slides you could only go to class for tests and group assignments.

4.0
2.0
1775NATS
Grade: A
Sep 6, 2017
Would take again

Great prof!!!! Whatever problems you have she will respond to emails extremely fast. You can also take advantage of her office hours. Projects are pretty straight forward. If you pay attention to the lectures you don't have to depend on the readings as much because her lectures go into depth. The only way your grade could be low is if you don't try

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Jan 1, 2018
Would take again

She is very nice, but lectures are disorganized. I went to all the lectures, recorded her voice and took note of everything she said. Lecture slides are not clear, and with the textbook only you wont be able to do well on the tests. There were two multiple choice tests and two short answer quizzes and 4 inclass group works.

5.0
1.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Mar 21, 2018
Would take again

Very helpful and listening professor. She replies to emails fast and helps in the best way possible unlike other professors in the social science department sosc10

4.0
2.0
NATS1560
Apr 4, 2018
Would take again

Dr Monaldi is a great professor because she explains things and is always willing to help you. This is a really easy course that doesn't require much effort. Easy A

Gives good feedback
Respected
Caring
3.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Aug 31, 2018
Would take again

Nice prof, quick with replying. Overall, if you attend class and take good notes, you can easily pass without using the textbook. Conversely, if you don't attend, just read the textbook and you should be good to go. There were 2 quizzes (short answer) and 2 tests (MCQ) and 2 assignments. Easy A.

Clear grading criteria
Caring
4.0
2.0
NATS1570
Grade: A
Oct 18, 2018
Would take again

I'm not a science person at all so I was worried for my first NATS course, but Professor Monaldi's Understanding Food course is really interesting! She is really good at emailing you, and her tests/quizzes only take from the slides and textbook so as long as you study major concepts you're fine! She also dealt amazingly with the strike!

Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
3.0
STS3730
Grade: A
Jan 4, 2019
Would take again

Great prof. Very clear lectures and readings, and expects you to do them and participate in class. Always takes the time to answer questions and is overall very patient and willing to teach/educate.

Get ready to read
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Caring
4.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: Rather not say
Aug 22, 2019
Would take again

She is a very kind professor that is always accessible and lenient towards students. She explains things very well and you do not even need to read the book.

Caring
Accessible outside class
4.0
3.0
STS2010
Grade: A
Feb 8, 2020
Would take again

Her slides contain a lot of information, so much so that you don't have to do the readings necessarily. She's passionate about what she speaks about and sometimes goes on a tangent which is fine. Go to class! Every class is worth 1%, 8 lecture classes and 1 bonus. Meant the difference between my final grade going from a B+ to an A (80.25%).

Lecture heavy
4.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 13, 2020
Would take again

Accessible outside of lecture, patient, and amazingly responsive to emails. But, she adds too much on her ppt. slides and at times goes on needlessly long tangents. Also, her speech's accent, and pacing is brutal. But then again, if you take great lecture notes, you won't need to use the textbook nearly as much. Overall, very fair course.

Accessible outside class
Skip class? You won't pass.
Caring
4.0
4.0
NATS1920
Mar 26, 2020
Would take again

She's a great prof. But the course itself is horrible and boring because she's the only prof that teaches this course.

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Hilarious
3.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Apr 22, 2020
Would take again

She's an okay prof, however this course is definitely not easy. There are 2 activities, 2 quizzes and 2 tests. The mark you get mainly depends on which TA is marking it. There is a lot of material to learn and memorize and after the first few lectures, the material gets really boring and difficult.

1.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Apr 22, 2020
Wouldn't take again

I have never waited longer to get assignments back. Her TAs are so subjective and all mark things differently. My friend and I did the assignment together, one of us got an 80 other got a 40. The course itself is not hard, but Monaldi is a poor excuse for a prof and does not know how to engage students. Take it if you want to nap at school.

Test heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
NATS1560
Apr 24, 2020
Wouldn't take again

This was the worst class I have ever taken. I took this course thinking that it was going to be easy but it was the complete opposite. All of her TA's marked differently and gave no feedback on assignments. Her test reviews are lengthy and useless. It took over a month to receive grades back for assignments and quizzes. AVOID THIS PROF IF YOU CAN!!

Get ready to read
Tough grader
5.0
2.0
NATS1560
Jul 1, 2020
Would take again

Her tests are all memorization, questions covered in class are most definitely on her tests/quizzes. Slides are bit long but she explains everything in them, cool if you miss class. Understanding asf, just explain your situation and she gives out extensions all the time. Her assignments are straightforward. No textbook literally just lectures.

4.0
3.0
STS24112222
Grade: A+
Jul 2, 2020
Would take again

Professor Monaldi was an amazing professor. I had her for STS 2411 and STS 2222, she was very caring towards the students. Sometimes her lectures could be dry and she has a lot of readings but her tests were fair. She was very understanding when it came to deadlines and if asked she would extend. I would definitely take more courses with her!

Respected
Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Jul 29, 2020
Would take again

She was the most understanding prof ever and was very sweet. the course material was interesting, though could challenge you at times but I thoroughly enjoyed her class and I would take it a million times over!

Accessible outside class
Caring
2.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Sep 1, 2020
Wouldn't take again

An easy class but you won't learn much. All tests were based purely off her PPTs. She just reads her PPTs so no need to attend class if you review them. Some of her quiz questions are factually incorrect.

4.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 22, 2020
Would take again

I would for sure take her class again like a 10/10 would recommend, she's honestly one of my favourite profs for my first year. All activities are multiple-choice and based on the presentations we read, she gives out 2 tests and 2 assignments but is bearable once you go over course material. I however never used the textbook we were assigned to buy

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
4.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Jan 19, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I took the class in the Fall of 2020 and it was overall really fun and interesting. There are activities and quizzes but those are pretty simple if you go through the professor's powerpoints. The most lengthy and time-consuming part of the course was the written assignments so that's the only boring part about the course. Otherwise, easy A.

Respected
Lots of homework
Get ready to read
1.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A-
Feb 4, 2021
Wouldn't take again

The class is not hard, the quizzes are straight from the powerpoints. I never buy textbooks and this class never used them. I'm usually a C student, but this class was really easy in the tests and quizzes. The assignments are a lot of work and make absolutely no sense, especially if you have never taken science past grade 10. Would not recommend.

Lots of homework
So many papers
4.0
3.0
NATS1560
Grade: B
May 2, 2021
Would take again

The professor is very kind and understanding... although the course material is not that easy, if you want a better grade you should really work hard.

5.0
1.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
May 3, 2021
Would take again

The prof prepared all the required material and course outlines before the start of the year, so it was easy to understand/prep for upcoming assignments. All the resources required were given; assignments and tests were very similar to lecture material. It was generally easy to follow class with minimum preparation. Great prof, but can be slow.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Accessible outside class
2.0
3.0
NATS1560
Grade: Not sure yet
Jul 4, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Honestly, took this class as it was known to be a bird course but this Professor is absolutely horrendous. Firstly, she posts lectures that she recorded years ago and doesnt do any new lectures for this year. The way the assignments are marked is absolutely awful. Lastly, the way she replies to her emails is completely rude and unempathetic.

3.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Nov 22, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Prof Monaldi has too many assignments/quizzes/tests that are barely weighted then exams that are weighted heavily. Her accent makes it sometimes difficult to understand what she is saying, but she always answers questions when students seek clarification.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Test heavy
3.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Jan 10, 2022
Would take again

Daniela's slides and pre-recorded lectures are basically all you need to pass this course. This class has no exam and is basically just assignment/test-based. Her tests are quite unfair though, 30 mins for 30 questions... barely gives you time to even think. However, this course is very manageable.

Clear grading criteria
4.0
3.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Mar 29, 2022
Would take again

I recommended taking this course as an elective. If you watch the lectures, you'll be fine. 3 assignments each worth 20%, grading was tough but you're just answering questions based on the lectures/readings. 10 easy weekly quizzes worth 10% altogether. 2 tests each 15% (30 MC) they were tricky. Overall, great course and prof! Don't need tb.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Accessible outside class
2.0
1.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Apr 17, 2022

Didn't watch a single lecture or go to a tutorial and ended with an A, Tests are factually incorrect sometimes but whatever. Take this course if you want an easy A but don't expect to get assignments back until weeks after submission with probably the worst grading methods possible.

3.0
3.0
NATS1740
Grade: A
Apr 19, 2022

Took this course for the extra credits. Quite interesting. The T.A's were tough markers though. If you pay attention to the lecture you'll do good. the quizzes are straight up from the slides. The assignments have resources where you find the answers and the midterm and final were okay.

Tough grader
Amazing lectures
Lecture heavy
2.0
3.0
NATS1560
Grade: B+
Apr 30, 2022

She could barely get a proper sentence out of her. Most of the information for the quizzes were on the slides or in the textbook. The test somewhat relate back to the powerpoints. You can get a decent mark if you read the slides. However, the TA's can be unresonable. Half of them didn't speak fluent English and would reticule any feedback given.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
1920
Grade: B
May 18, 2022
Would take again

I had her for STS3600 and she was just an amazing professor. I'm graduating and this is the first time rating a professor because she was very nice and understanding. Participation matters and there are lots of readings. Classes were not boring because her lectures involve the participation of the students and the topics were very interesting.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
2.0
1.0
STS3600
Grade: Not sure yet
May 31, 2022

I am writing this review exactly one month after the last day of winter exams, with only 40% of my final mark presented to me, as she's still marking. Course had 1-2 readings per week (available online) & lectures were unengaging recaps of said readings. She tried making breakout rooms for discussion, but nobody ever speaks. Very particular grading

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
STS3726
Grade: Not sure yet
Sep 2, 2022

Professor Monaldi was a nice enough professor. Assignments are graded hard! The biggest problem is the length of time to receive grades. Consistent issue, no accountability. Still waiting for final grades - courses ended august 9, exams ended August 18 and still nothing but an email saying they fell behind. (Too bad we cannot use that excuse).

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
STS3726
Grade: Not sure yet
Sep 3, 2022
Would take again

Professor Monaldi is brilliant, organized, and provides all the resources for students to be successful. Everything was there in the course folders! She evaluates student work with integrity. Even with help, it is impossible to mark all assignments in a matter of weeks given our large class size. Fantastic quality human being and prof in one!

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Respected
1.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: B+
Jan 17, 2023

She cannot get a full sentence out of her mouth without stuttering. Take another prof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Inspirational
2.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: F
Feb 6, 2023

I Did not understand anything,I had difficulty understanding the accent, plus the lecture was 3 hours long.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
STS4785
Feb 7, 2023

I advise everyone to stay away from taking a class with this professor as she does not grade assignments on time and does not send any grades to the registrars office at the end of a class. Please for the sake of your GPA, do not take a course with her.

Tough grader
So many papers
1.0
5.0
STS4785
Grade: C
Feb 8, 2023

I regretted taking this course. Not only are there too many deadlines, she's also disorganized, hasn't provided the final grades after nearly two months of completing the course, and a very hard marker! She allows you to use any citation on assignments, but feedback on assignments, she'll say "use this citation." This course will drop your GPA!!

Tough grader
So many papers
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: Rather not say
Jul 7, 2023

If you don't mind a prof with a heavy accent then take her, otherwise, you're better off taking different prof. Her accent was hard to understand even when I sat up close.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Apr 5, 2024
Would take again

I saw many negative comments on here about Professor Monaldi. Her accent is not difficult to understand and she is engaging with iClicker questions. She is super caring and wants the best for her students. The assignments were marked pretty hard, but if you put in effort you can get a good grade (I got a 97% and a 98% but some people did worse).

Tough grader
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
1.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Apr 20, 2024
Would take again

Despite the negative comments about her here, she is a super caring professor who genuinely wants the best for her students. As a general note, I do not recommend solely looking at these reviews to choose a prof because often people with low grades blame the prof for their own faults. I worked hard and actually did all the work and achieved 100%.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Caring
5.0
1.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Apr 20, 2024
Would take again

There is lots of reading, but you can do well if you read all of the material. Also, she added a 7.5% boost to the tests and even let people exceed 100% (e.g. 105% with the boost) while most profs cap the marks with a boost at 100%. The assignments are graded pretty hard so make sure to include all possible details in your responses.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
4.0
STS2222
Dec 23, 2024

Grading took forever. For instance, I got a grade in late December on an assignment that was due in mid October.

Tough grader
2.0
4.0
STS2222
Grade: Not sure yet
Jan 5, 2025

Caring & wants us to succeed BUT takes FOREVER to grade stuff. I had an assignment graded back 2 months later and still waiting on another grade while the next semester starts tomorrow.... High maintenance class (weekly quizzes that were tough & participation), easy tests (Q's from review/quizzes). Lectures are hard to follow and tough grader.

Tough grader
2.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Feb 27, 2025

Heavy accent. Weird terminalogy she doesnt want to teach she just want to catch you with word games. Tough grader outside of the rubric don t take it

Tough grader
Hilarious
2.0
3.0
NATS1560
Grade: B
Mar 5, 2025

Not a great professor-take this course with a different prof and you will be more interested and likely get a better grade.

1.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: C+
Mar 12, 2025

Tests and Quiz are Difficult. If she is not your main subject teacher, I suggest do not choose her

Lots of homework
So many papers
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: B
Apr 8, 2025

Boring Lectures. Very easy quizzes but too difficult tests.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Test heavy
4.0
3.0
NATS1560
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Apr 9, 2025
Would take again

Daniela is passionate about what she teaches and she explains concepts well. Her iClicker participation exercises were fair and engaging. However, she can be hard to understand. And definitely don't expect the class to be easy. There is a lot of chemistry and biology involved. There are lots of readings and quizzes, and some projects and tests.

Participation matters
Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 28, 2025

Marking in this course is insane, and fighting for your grade is impossible. Sweet woman but lectures are boring and unengaging, just reads off of the slides. Clicker questions are mandatory and tough, even the prof get confused with them and answers them incorrectly. Overall, do not recommend this course or professor.

1.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: C
Oct 1, 2025

Very disorganized, hard to follow.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
5.0
NATS1560
Oct 4, 2025

As said by others the professor has a very heavy accent in which it may be hard to follow during lectures. You will need to understand the basics of chemistry as-well.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
1.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: B-
Oct 22, 2025

just bad dont take

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Oct 22, 2025

CHEESE IS UNPROCESSED ION WHAT THIS PROF IS ON ABOUT

1.0
2.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Oct 29, 2025

Easy course, but very rude and condescending to her students. Always talks about personal problems during class.

1.0
2.0
NATS1560
Nov 19, 2025

stretches 10 slides into 3 hours

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
NATS1560
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 19, 2025

Get ready to read? more like get ready to die. Now that all the lectures are over (thank god), I can say that the information in this course does not need to be this hard to understand. She missed 3/11 lectures which are all 3 hours long. The "AMAZING guest lectures" who took her place while gone are TAs. + Cheese is not processed, or is it? IDK.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Hilarious
2.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 20, 2025

Sweet woman but lectures are so long and information gets confusing. If you like chem, you'll probably do well. Tests are multiple choice so no way to explain yourself. Lots of memorizing random things that you probably won't ever need to know again (date ranges, people, etc.)

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lots of homework
1.0
3.0
NATS1560
Grade: A+
Nov 24, 2025

Assignments are graded like your life depends on it. One missed detail say goodbye to your mark. Tests are very simple though, all MCQ so if you memorize well you're good. Lectures are also stretched for the full 3 hours and are hard to follow/borderline unwatchable. Prof can be extremely condescending in class at times aswell. DO NOT RECOMMEND!!!

1.0
3.0
NATS1560
Grade: A
Nov 25, 2025

No words...

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
3.0
4.0
NATS1560
Grade: C
Dec 9, 2025

Professor Monaldi is a wonderful professor. She's very accessible and very kind. I was not the biggest fan of this course; I do not believe it's for me. This course is pretty test-heavy and a bit harder to understand and there's some tough grading. Other than that, Professor Monaldi was very sweet.

Tough grader
Test heavy
Accessible outside class
1.0
4.0
STS2222
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 30, 2025

An assignment that was due 6 weeks ago is still not graded. Grades come out so late and then the TAs grade so tough for absolutely no reason. Their feedback is also very rude. There is so many readings. So much material for a short test. At this rate I might get an A+ in math and a B in this course.

Tough grader
So many papers
Lecture heavy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

45%

Textbook Required

15%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 49 grades
Most common grades:
A (18)
A+ (13)
Not sure yet (11)
Grade Distribution
A(31)B(6)C(6)D(3)F(1)A-/B+(4)
Based on 65 reported grades
A: 18
A+: 13
Not sure yet: 11
B: 5
Common Tags
Get ready to read (24)
Tough grader (21)
Lecture heavy (12)
Caring (11)
Participation matters (10)
Accessible outside class (7)
Gives good feedback (6)
Respected (5)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.83 avg change
Feb
Mar
Apr
Oct
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

NATS1830

5.0

(1)

STS3730

5.0

(2)

1920

4.5

(2)

NATS1700

4.0

(2)

STS3970

4.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

STS4785

5.0

NATS

4.0

STS2222

4.0

STS3726

3.5

NATS1700

3.0

Similar Professors