2.2
Quality3.9
Difficulty20%
Would Retake91
Reviews20%
Would Retake
91
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
91 total ratings5
5
4
18
3
16
2
17
1
35
What Students Say
“Professor Matthiesen is a great professor if you would like to hear the tales a the astronaut who didn't do anything”
ENGR145 - 2.0 rating“He also does not care how bad students do on tests, the past averages all being below an 80% and the most recent test almost at a failing grade”
ENGR145 - 1.0 ratingClass Info
Attendance Mandatory
17%
Textbook Required
25%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.51 avg changeRatings by Course
ENDR145
5.0
(1)EMSE201
5.0
(1)EMSE504
5.0
(1)EMSEALL
4.0
(1)EMSE202
3.5
(2)Difficulty by Course
EMSE280
5.0
GRAD
5.0
ENGR145
4.0
EMSEALL
4.0
EMSE504
4.0
Reviews (90)
Great Teaching Style, Very Organized. He has swords. :)
Good times? No. Bad times.
total shmo. all he talks about is how he was an never got to go to space
Very Vague. Tries to pull fast ones. Decent tests. Kind of Hard. Fair overall
maybe he should focus on the research; tests waaaay too hard
This class has made me rethink engineering as a whole. It's not the material...
No Comments
class isn't too hard...bad teacher though
Monotonous voice, bring a soda
Complete joke as a "teacher." Needs to take his head out of the lab for once
No Comments
No Comments
No Comments
No Comments
Generally tells you what you need to know for tests and HW
No Comments
failed astronaut + butch TA = no fun
Decent Guy. 50 minute, hard tests from HW. Blackwell is supposed to be better.
No Comments
Decent teacher. Sometimes throws obscure stuff on the tests.
don't know y no one likes him. his class was perfect... for an engineer!!!!
He used trick questions on the exams.
No Comments
Matthiesen is OK, but lisp boy is annoying as f*ck
2nd time taking course, both with Matthiesen. Typical engineering prof
Worthless as a professor. Too caught up in his research to care about students.
Kind of knows his stuff, but doesnt teach it too well. Used swords, always a +.
He's worthless, pompous, annoying, boring, and often wrong.
Bitter astronaut who never got to space berates and verbally abuses students
We should let him have his wish and send him off to space, cuz no one wants him here
Had his moments...tests were quite difficult...very pompous
Yeah...he "knighted" engineers...nuff said. Fair guy though.
MAtthiesen was the worst prof I ever had. He is bitter about so much in his life - especially not getting to the moon. It makes this hell on earth for the rest of us. Also - get a life - you don't know anything about the real world.
It takes a while to get to know his teaching style, but if you take the time to do it he's not that bad. He's not as terrible as people say he is, its just that his tests are hard. Be nice to him and he'll be nice to you!
Really hard exams, which are difficult to finish in the 50 minutes he allots. Does almost NO example problems, which makes applying homework and exam problems harder than necessary. Probably had his lunch money stolen often when he was younger.
Incapable of understanding that he cannot teach. Arrogant to the point of convincing himself that the class is doing well when a majority are failing.
doesnt know what hes doing. he gives the same exact exams every year, but doesnt teach a thing. would be a memory class but we are allowed a notecard - class is completely useless with him teaching.in a class we need about 1 thing he says the whole time
absolutely horrible teacher. Boring, arrogant, completely unaware of his student's problems.An easy test does not mean it's ok 80 kids failed the last two! this tenured professor is vastly inferior to the grad student teaching engr 131.
He is the worst professor I have ever had. He doesn't teach anything, his tests are abnormally long, and he is bitter about not making it into space. He is very unapproachable and he is very arrogant.
This class cannot be taught well. It attempts to combine physics and chemistry into some kind of super science and it fails miserably. Do not take this course unless you have to. The course is horrible and needs to be restructured.
No Comments
Told me point blank that I should not be an engineer because I was not doing well in his calls, this was in my freshman year. Luckily, I ignored him and now I have a job as an engineer, glad I didn't take his advice.
Not too bad of a class, must be mellowing out this year. Partial credit always given with extreme reserve, and derives complex formulas without clearly explaining them. Interesting side-tangent stories though. Overall, not a bad guy, and average grades weren't terrible.
No problems with him. I learned some from his lectures and taught the rest to myself along with some help from TA's. Many people are bitter because this is a wake up class of what Case/college actually is. It's not that hard of a class, look at the old exams and go from there.
The tests are exercises in writing fast, but if you do the homework and pay attention in lecture, theres not much to not expect. Plus the free 3x5 card helps a lot. Grades are entirely objective, so you can determine your grade based on tests before the professor files it.
A strict lecturer, don't expect much help or practice from him...go to recitation for that. He'll teach you what you need, but he expects little short of mastery during the exams, which are always longer than they should be. All in all, not bad.
Everybody's favorite ex-almost-a-backup-spaceman!
Space-the final frontier. Fortunately, it will never be his frontier. GET OVER IT AND YOURSELF! You are a terrible professor and your wife is WAY smarter than you are. I'm sorry that you're old, bitter, and angry and that you still cannot grow even the simplest of crystals. Microgravity=wussy.
No Comments
A very excellent lecturer who knows his stuff and how to teach it to you. He is totally objective and makes lecture very enjoyable with his dry humor. Be ready do practice tests and you'll be fine.
There are a lot of funny comments people make about Matthiesen but basically he is one of those people that may do a fine job at NASA but should never have been a teacher. He tries to teach what he knows but cannot find an effective method to do so. If you have the chance, take Blackwell's section instead.
He likes pointing out that he almost got to be an on-call astronaut. He even brings in hunks of space shuttle tile and blasts them with a blowtorch. How does this relate to chemistry? I took the course and still have no clue. If I liked chemistry, it might have been a decent course, but as it is, it was worthless.
Great Lecturer. Tests are hard becuase of the time limit but the material is laid before you with no guessing about what will be on the test. Memorize material and write fast and you will get an A.
No Comments
Extremely annoying. (Un)fortunately also extremely intelligent. If you are a blonde short-haired female he will get creepy. Sneers a lot too, but if you can ignore the negative bits of his personality he will teach you a lot.
terrible teacher, worst at case, so far
Not a bad professor, but one of those people who you can never really trust. In other words, it is not beyond him to play sly games with the class and exams. In general, he is a very capable lecturer. The test are a bit of an excercise in writing quickly, but the questions are (usually) very similar to homeworks. Has a great sense of humor.
Likes to pretend he is smart and important but is neither. Preys on cute women.
Scary class that consumes your life. Professorial interaction in lab activities is minimal, but this is planned to make students self-sufficient. Even though Dr. Matthiesen makes you cry yourself to sleep a few times during the semester, you come out with a strange respect for this man (and an A, if you put in your share of the effort.)
Professor definitely knows what he's talking about, but the class is hard. Material covered in lectures seems only generally related to the material on homework and tests. The first test was easy, the other 2 hard. The answers to the homework are in the back of the book, and there's a huge extra credit assignment, so you really have to try to bad.
This guy knows his stuff. Pretty interesting lecturer. Easy A if you do the homework and pay attention in class. Last test was hard but gives an A at 80% and gives extra credit. Overall great class if you enjoy the subject material.
He makes me want to cry. His class is pointless and your only hope to survive the class is the TAs. He's arrogant and refuses to be lenient in any way.
There is no point in going to class. He didn't cover anything useful at all. The TA's teach the whole class. Tests were decent after he failed the whole class on the first exam.
Best Prof Ever! Very friendly and down to earth guy. I wish he would teach all of my classes!
He's a really nice guy and is really nice about reviewing in class before tests
His idea of lecturing is reading directly from the book. It is really sad that I am paying as much as I am for such an incompetent professor. I would recommend avoiding if you don't want to be bored out of your mind and actually want to learn something.
He reads from the book. If you read the book, its just like going to class.
He spent every class reading the chapter objectives and the chapter summaries to us. Very boring lecture, but he tricks you into going because he gives you clicker points. I only knew what was going on in this class because of my TA. Homework takes forever. Tests are pretty straight forward if you understand the homework.
Loved the class and learned a lot. Students that do not like him are underachievers. Does not curve, but made the final three exams extremely easy after the average on the first exam was a 57. very entertaining professor.
He is boring because he is bored. You can tell that he knows his stuff but the TAs do a better job at explaining the material that he does. When he shows an example in class he doesn't put himself in the shoes of the student. he just rambles about how easy the problem is.
This man does not explain anything, but instead talks about his wind turbine and beeing an astronaut. This would not be a problem, if the class was easy, but instead you have to know literal quantum physics. He is terrible.
He looks at the slides and talks about the vast amount of irrelevant information rather than talking about the subject matter needed for the test that very same week.
Professor Matthiesen is a great professor if you would like to hear the tales a the astronaut who didn't do anything. His lectures are irrelevant albeit entertaining if you find enjoyment in having no idea what you will be tested on. To be aggressively blatant, this is nothing more than a philosophy course where you take chemistry exams
Matthiesen would probably be a better teacher in a smaller setting, but in a class of 400+ students he kinda just keeps talking about lots of irrelevant things during lecture. His lectures and the homework barely line up only due to him mentioning an equation you need to use maybe one time during class. Not he nicest guy really either. 56% on test1
His lectures suck. You basically just have to go through his lecture slides on your own. The homework isn't hard if you work with friends or with a TA. The tests are pretty similar to the homework problems, but a little harder. He doesn't give a lot of partial credit. However, he does let you use a cheat sheet on the tests so take advantage of that
Class is fine, homework a bit intense and exams are heavily weighted. First three tests were not difficult, fourth was more challenging, but I still managed to not take the final because I had an A average. Lectures can sometimes be a waste of time, but sometimes he explains concepts and if you miss it, it isn't always stated on the lecture slides.
Tests are graded toughly and graders are very nitpicky. Homeworks have little to do with lectures, so help from TAs is necessary. Lectures are boring and contain excess and useless information.
Matthiesen teaches qualitatively while testing everyone on the quantitative stuff. He also does not care how bad students do on tests, the past averages all being below an 80% and the most recent test almost at a failing grade. But hey he almost was an astronaut (and somehow was voted teacher of the year in his department)
Matthiesen is the most arrogant and unhelpful professor I've had so far. He doesn't care about students whatsoever. There's homework every week where you sit and teach yourself the material since his lectures are spent talking about how he was almost an astronaut. On the last exam the average was a 60% with no curve, lots of people have had to drop
Spends lecture either talking about himself or telling useless stories. His tests are too long and each question is worth too many points. He cannot teach.
The worst course I've taken here. He is an inefficient teacher and both the homework and exam problems are incredibly difficult and he is not accessible to students.
He is by far one of the worst professors on campus. Doesn't have any regard for how his students perform in the class or what they get out of it. Unless you want to hear the musings of a wannabe astronaut who does not know how to teach, do not take this class.
Dr. Matthiesen's lectures often diverge away from Chemistry of Materials, but usually in a way that provides a good background about the engineering discipline. He makes you work for your grade, but he does teach everything you need to do well on homeworks and tests. He's an old-school professor and may come across as rude, but he's a great guy.
One of the worst professors I've had so far. But not as bad as a lot of people are making him seem. This class is a lot of work and a lot of learning on your own. Some people can't handle that too well.
Frankly, his lectures suck. I did appreciate his information, and it was cool to see the applications of what we're learning, but a 300 person lecture is not the time or place for off-topic factoids. Homework is quite difficult and graded harshly, the same for exams. Don't take for 145.
I'm sure he would have been a good guest lecturer, but instead of talking about what we need to know for tests and homeworks he goes on random tangents for half of class. Homework is difficult, go to the ENGR 145 help center to talk to TAs about it. Tests are graded really hard, and sometimes about random stuff that he only tangentially mentioned.
This was my worst experience with a teacher in 19 years of being alive. He was the most egotistical and self-centered man I have ever encountered, who would publicly call students out for minor errors they had made. Avoid at all costs.
The worst professor the halls of Case Western Reserve University. Lost multiple students exams and gave them zeros because "one exam is dropped". Avoid at all costs. Does not teach, and over 70% of the class either dropped it or failed.
Fair professor. If you pay attention during lecture and work through the homework with a decent understanding, you'll be fine. What you get out of this class is what you put in. Don't expect an easy A or B. I also appreciated his style of lecturing.
Prof. Matthiesen is the fairest grader I've ever had. The exams closely resemble the homework and classwork. Homework is due before the lecture that covers the content so you will have to read ahead in the textbook, but it's a good textbook.
Class Info
Attendance Mandatory
17%
Textbook Required
25%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.51 avg changeRatings by Course
ENDR145
5.0
(1)EMSE201
5.0
(1)EMSE504
5.0
(1)EMSEALL
4.0
(1)EMSE202
3.5
(2)Difficulty by Course
EMSE280
5.0
GRAD
5.0
ENGR145
4.0
EMSEALL
4.0
EMSE504
4.0