2.2

David Matthiesen

Materials Science - Case Western Reserve University

2.2
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
20%
Would Retake
91
Reviews
2.2
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
2.1
Helpful
2.4
Clarity

20%

Would Retake

91

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
91 total ratings

5

5

4

18

3

16

2

17

1

35

What Students Say

Professor Matthiesen is a great professor if you would like to hear the tales a the astronaut who didn't do anything

ENGR145 - 2.0 rating

He also does not care how bad students do on tests, the past averages all being below an 80% and the most recent test almost at a failing grade

ENGR145 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

17%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

89% confidence
Based on 13 grades
Most common grades:
B (5)
Not sure yet (4)
A (3)
Grade Distribution
A(3)B(5)C(2)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 18 reported grades
B: 5
Not sure yet: 4
A: 3
C: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (15)
TEST HEAVY (9)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (7)
Get ready to read (6)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (4)
Inspirational (2)
Caring (1)
Clear grading criteria (1)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.51 avg change
Jan
Feb
Apr
May
Nov
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENDR145

5.0

(1)

EMSE201

5.0

(1)

EMSE504

5.0

(1)

EMSEALL

4.0

(1)

EMSE202

3.5

(2)
+5 more courses
Difficulty by Course

EMSE280

5.0

GRAD

5.0

ENGR145

4.0

EMSEALL

4.0

EMSE504

4.0

Reviews (90)
4.0
4.0
ENGR145
Feb 5, 2002

Great Teaching Style, Very Organized. He has swords. :)

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Feb 6, 2002

Good times? No. Bad times.

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Feb 6, 2002

total shmo. all he talks about is how he was an never got to go to space

3.0
3.0
ENGR145
Apr 9, 2002

Very Vague. Tries to pull fast ones. Decent tests. Kind of Hard. Fair overall

4.0
5.0
ENGR145
Apr 9, 2002

maybe he should focus on the research; tests waaaay too hard

2.0
5.0
ENGR145
Apr 25, 2002

This class has made me rethink engineering as a whole. It's not the material...

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Apr 26, 2002

No Comments

2.0
4.0
ENGR145
Apr 26, 2002

class isn't too hard...bad teacher though

4.0
3.0
ENGR145
Apr 27, 2002

Monotonous voice, bring a soda

1.0
4.0
ENGR145
Apr 28, 2002

Complete joke as a "teacher." Needs to take his head out of the lab for once

3.0
4.0
ENGR145
Apr 28, 2002

No Comments

1.0
3.0
ENGR145
Apr 30, 2002

No Comments

2.0
4.0
ENGR145
Apr 30, 2002

No Comments

2.0
5.0
ENGR145
May 3, 2002

No Comments

4.0
3.0
ENGR145
Oct 16, 2002

Generally tells you what you need to know for tests and HW

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Oct 27, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Nov 11, 2002

failed astronaut + butch TA = no fun

4.0
3.0
ENGR145
Nov 18, 2002

Decent Guy. 50 minute, hard tests from HW. Blackwell is supposed to be better.

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Nov 19, 2002

No Comments

3.0
3.0
ENGR145
Nov 26, 2002

Decent teacher. Sometimes throws obscure stuff on the tests.

5.0
2.0
ENDR145
Nov 26, 2002

don't know y no one likes him. his class was perfect... for an engineer!!!!

4.0
5.0
ENGR145
Nov 26, 2002

He used trick questions on the exams.

2.0
4.0
ENGR145
Nov 26, 2002

No Comments

4.0
4.0
ENGR145
Nov 27, 2002

Matthiesen is OK, but lisp boy is annoying as f*ck

5.0
3.0
ENGR145
Dec 2, 2002

2nd time taking course, both with Matthiesen. Typical engineering prof

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Dec 10, 2002

Worthless as a professor. Too caught up in his research to care about students.

2.0
4.0
ENGR145
Dec 13, 2002

Kind of knows his stuff, but doesnt teach it too well. Used swords, always a +.

2.0
3.0
ENGR145
Dec 15, 2002

He's worthless, pompous, annoying, boring, and often wrong.

1.0
5.0
EMSE280
Jan 31, 2003

Bitter astronaut who never got to space berates and verbally abuses students

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Mar 6, 2003

We should let him have his wish and send him off to space, cuz no one wants him here

3.0
4.0
ENGR145
Apr 6, 2003

Had his moments...tests were quite difficult...very pompous

3.0
3.0
ENGR145
Dec 18, 2003

Yeah...he "knighted" engineers...nuff said. Fair guy though.

1.0
5.0
GRAD
Apr 3, 2004

MAtthiesen was the worst prof I ever had. He is bitter about so much in his life - especially not getting to the moon. It makes this hell on earth for the rest of us. Also - get a life - you don't know anything about the real world.

4.0
4.0
ENGR145
Apr 8, 2004

It takes a while to get to know his teaching style, but if you take the time to do it he's not that bad. He's not as terrible as people say he is, its just that his tests are hard. Be nice to him and he'll be nice to you!

2.0
5.0
ENGR145
Apr 8, 2004

Really hard exams, which are difficult to finish in the 50 minutes he allots. Does almost NO example problems, which makes applying homework and exam problems harder than necessary. Probably had his lunch money stolen often when he was younger.

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Apr 11, 2004

Incapable of understanding that he cannot teach. Arrogant to the point of convincing himself that the class is doing well when a majority are failing.

1.0
4.0
ENGR145
Apr 20, 2004

doesnt know what hes doing. he gives the same exact exams every year, but doesnt teach a thing. would be a memory class but we are allowed a notecard - class is completely useless with him teaching.in a class we need about 1 thing he says the whole time

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Apr 20, 2004

absolutely horrible teacher. Boring, arrogant, completely unaware of his student's problems.An easy test does not mean it's ok 80 kids failed the last two! this tenured professor is vastly inferior to the grad student teaching engr 131.

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Apr 30, 2004

He is the worst professor I have ever had. He doesn't teach anything, his tests are abnormally long, and he is bitter about not making it into space. He is very unapproachable and he is very arrogant.

3.0
4.0
ENGR145
May 4, 2004

This class cannot be taught well. It attempts to combine physics and chemistry into some kind of super science and it fails miserably. Do not take this course unless you have to. The course is horrible and needs to be restructured.

2.0
3.0
ENGR145
May 27, 2004

No Comments

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Jul 26, 2004

Told me point blank that I should not be an engineer because I was not doing well in his calls, this was in my freshman year. Luckily, I ignored him and now I have a job as an engineer, glad I didn't take his advice.

3.0
3.0
ENGR145
Nov 18, 2004

Not too bad of a class, must be mellowing out this year. Partial credit always given with extreme reserve, and derives complex formulas without clearly explaining them. Interesting side-tangent stories though. Overall, not a bad guy, and average grades weren't terrible.

4.0
2.0
ENGR145
Nov 21, 2004

No problems with him. I learned some from his lectures and taught the rest to myself along with some help from TA's. Many people are bitter because this is a wake up class of what Case/college actually is. It's not that hard of a class, look at the old exams and go from there.

4.0
2.0
ENGR145
Dec 8, 2004

The tests are exercises in writing fast, but if you do the homework and pay attention in lecture, theres not much to not expect. Plus the free 3x5 card helps a lot. Grades are entirely objective, so you can determine your grade based on tests before the professor files it.

4.0
3.0
ENGR145
Dec 13, 2004

A strict lecturer, don't expect much help or practice from him...go to recitation for that. He'll teach you what you need, but he expects little short of mastery during the exams, which are always longer than they should be. All in all, not bad.

2.0
4.0
ENGR145
Feb 21, 2005

Everybody's favorite ex-almost-a-backup-spaceman!

1.0
5.0
GRAD
Apr 8, 2005

Space-the final frontier. Fortunately, it will never be his frontier. GET OVER IT AND YOURSELF! You are a terrible professor and your wife is WAY smarter than you are. I'm sorry that you're old, bitter, and angry and that you still cannot grow even the simplest of crystals. Microgravity=wussy.

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Grade: B
Aug 24, 2005

No Comments

4.0
3.0
ENGR145
Grade: A-
Nov 16, 2005

A very excellent lecturer who knows his stuff and how to teach it to you. He is totally objective and makes lecture very enjoyable with his dry humor. Be ready do practice tests and you'll be fine.

1.0
4.0
ENGR145
Nov 20, 2005

There are a lot of funny comments people make about Matthiesen but basically he is one of those people that may do a fine job at NASA but should never have been a teacher. He tries to teach what he knows but cannot find an effective method to do so. If you have the chance, take Blackwell's section instead.

2.0
5.0
ENGR145
Nov 29, 2005

He likes pointing out that he almost got to be an on-call astronaut. He even brings in hunks of space shuttle tile and blasts them with a blowtorch. How does this relate to chemistry? I took the course and still have no clue. If I liked chemistry, it might have been a decent course, but as it is, it was worthless.

4.0
3.0
ENGR145
Mar 2, 2006

Great Lecturer. Tests are hard becuase of the time limit but the material is laid before you with no guessing about what will be on the test. Memorize material and write fast and you will get an A.

3.0
3.0
ENGR145
May 10, 2006

No Comments

4.0
4.0
EMSEALL
Apr 10, 2007

Extremely annoying. (Un)fortunately also extremely intelligent. If you are a blonde short-haired female he will get creepy. Sneers a lot too, but if you can ignore the negative bits of his personality he will teach you a lot.

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Apr 11, 2007

terrible teacher, worst at case, so far

3.0
3.0
EMSE202
May 20, 2007

Not a bad professor, but one of those people who you can never really trust. In other words, it is not beyond him to play sly games with the class and exams. In general, he is a very capable lecturer. The test are a bit of an excercise in writing quickly, but the questions are (usually) very similar to homeworks. Has a great sense of humor.

1.0
2.0
ENGRALL
Nov 1, 2007

Likes to pretend he is smart and important but is neither. Preys on cute women.

3.0
5.0
EMSE280
Jan 8, 2008

Scary class that consumes your life. Professorial interaction in lab activities is minimal, but this is planned to make students self-sufficient. Even though Dr. Matthiesen makes you cry yourself to sleep a few times during the semester, you come out with a strange respect for this man (and an A, if you put in your share of the effort.)

4.0
4.0
EMSE202
Apr 21, 2009

Professor definitely knows what he's talking about, but the class is hard. Material covered in lectures seems only generally related to the material on homework and tests. The first test was easy, the other 2 hard. The answers to the homework are in the back of the book, and there's a huge extra credit assignment, so you really have to try to bad.

5.0
3.0
EMSE201
Mar 10, 2011

This guy knows his stuff. Pretty interesting lecturer. Easy A if you do the homework and pay attention in class. Last test was hard but gives an A at 80% and gives extra credit. Overall great class if you enjoy the subject material.

2.0
4.0
ENGR225
Nov 28, 2011

He makes me want to cry. His class is pointless and your only hope to survive the class is the TAs. He's arrogant and refuses to be lenient in any way.

1.0
5.0
ENGR225
Dec 16, 2011

There is no point in going to class. He didn't cover anything useful at all. The TA's teach the whole class. Tests were decent after he failed the whole class on the first exam.

5.0
1.0
ENGR225
Dec 16, 2011

Best Prof Ever! Very friendly and down to earth guy. I wish he would teach all of my classes!

4.0
3.0
ENGR225
Sep 26, 2012

He's a really nice guy and is really nice about reviewing in class before tests

1.0
5.0
ENGR225
Dec 9, 2012

His idea of lecturing is reading directly from the book. It is really sad that I am paying as much as I am for such an incompetent professor. I would recommend avoiding if you don't want to be bored out of your mind and actually want to learn something.

2.0
3.0
ENGR225
Dec 18, 2012

He reads from the book. If you read the book, its just like going to class.

3.0
4.0
ENGR225
Feb 28, 2013

He spent every class reading the chapter objectives and the chapter summaries to us. Very boring lecture, but he tricks you into going because he gives you clicker points. I only knew what was going on in this class because of my TA. Homework takes forever. Tests are pretty straight forward if you understand the homework.

4.0
1.0
ENGR225
Dec 27, 2013

Loved the class and learned a lot. Students that do not like him are underachievers. Does not curve, but made the final three exams extremely easy after the average on the first exam was a 57. very entertaining professor.

3.0
4.0
ENGR225
Grade: C
Aug 14, 2015

He is boring because he is bored. You can tell that he knows his stuff but the TAs do a better job at explaining the material that he does. When he shows an example in class he doesn't put himself in the shoes of the student. he just rambles about how easy the problem is.

1.0
4.0
ENGR145
Jan 22, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This man does not explain anything, but instead talks about his wind turbine and beeing an astronaut. This would not be a problem, if the class was easy, but instead you have to know literal quantum physics. He is terrible.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
3.0
ENGR145
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He looks at the slides and talks about the vast amount of irrelevant information rather than talking about the subject matter needed for the test that very same week.

Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
2.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 9, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Professor Matthiesen is a great professor if you would like to hear the tales a the astronaut who didn't do anything. His lectures are irrelevant albeit entertaining if you find enjoyment in having no idea what you will be tested on. To be aggressively blatant, this is nothing more than a philosophy course where you take chemistry exams

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Inspirational
1.0
4.0
ENGR145
Feb 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Matthiesen would probably be a better teacher in a smaller setting, but in a class of 400+ students he kinda just keeps talking about lots of irrelevant things during lecture. His lectures and the homework barely line up only due to him mentioning an equation you need to use maybe one time during class. Not he nicest guy really either. 56% on test1

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
3.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: B+
Apr 17, 2018
Wouldn't take again

His lectures suck. You basically just have to go through his lecture slides on your own. The homework isn't hard if you work with friends or with a TA. The tests are pretty similar to the homework problems, but a little harder. He doesn't give a lot of partial credit. However, he does let you use a cheat sheet on the tests so take advantage of that

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
3.0
3.0
ENGR145
Grade: A
Apr 18, 2018
Would take again

Class is fine, homework a bit intense and exams are heavily weighted. First three tests were not difficult, fourth was more challenging, but I still managed to not take the final because I had an A average. Lectures can sometimes be a waste of time, but sometimes he explains concepts and if you miss it, it isn't always stated on the lecture slides.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
Caring
1.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 19, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Tests are graded toughly and graders are very nitpicky. Homeworks have little to do with lectures, so help from TAs is necessary. Lectures are boring and contain excess and useless information.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
5.0
ENGR145
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 30, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Matthiesen teaches qualitatively while testing everyone on the quantitative stuff. He also does not care how bad students do on tests, the past averages all being below an 80% and the most recent test almost at a failing grade. But hey he almost was an astronaut (and somehow was voted teacher of the year in his department)

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
1.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: C
May 3, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Matthiesen is the most arrogant and unhelpful professor I've had so far. He doesn't care about students whatsoever. There's homework every week where you sit and teach yourself the material since his lectures are spent talking about how he was almost an astronaut. On the last exam the average was a 60% with no curve, lots of people have had to drop

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
1.0
4.0
ENGR145
May 3, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Spends lecture either talking about himself or telling useless stories. His tests are too long and each question is worth too many points. He cannot teach.

1.0
5.0
ENGR145
May 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

The worst course I've taken here. He is an inefficient teacher and both the homework and exam problems are incredibly difficult and he is not accessible to students.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
1.0
5.0
ENGR145
May 6, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He is by far one of the worst professors on campus. Doesn't have any regard for how his students perform in the class or what they get out of it. Unless you want to hear the musings of a wannabe astronaut who does not know how to teach, do not take this class.

Tough Grader
TEST HEAVY
3.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: A
May 10, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Matthiesen's lectures often diverge away from Chemistry of Materials, but usually in a way that provides a good background about the engineering discipline. He makes you work for your grade, but he does teach everything you need to do well on homeworks and tests. He's an old-school professor and may come across as rude, but he's a great guy.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
Clear grading criteria
TEST HEAVY
3.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: A
May 13, 2018
Would take again

One of the worst professors I've had so far. But not as bad as a lot of people are making him seem. This class is a lot of work and a lot of learning on your own. Some people can't handle that too well.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
TEST HEAVY
2.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: B
May 13, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Frankly, his lectures suck. I did appreciate his information, and it was cool to see the applications of what we're learning, but a 300 person lecture is not the time or place for off-topic factoids. Homework is quite difficult and graded harshly, the same for exams. Don't take for 145.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
2.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: B
May 14, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I'm sure he would have been a good guest lecturer, but instead of talking about what we need to know for tests and homeworks he goes on random tangents for half of class. Homework is difficult, go to the ENGR 145 help center to talk to TAs about it. Tests are graded really hard, and sometimes about random stuff that he only tangentially mentioned.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: B
May 20, 2018
Wouldn't take again

This was my worst experience with a teacher in 19 years of being alive. He was the most egotistical and self-centered man I have ever encountered, who would publicly call students out for minor errors they had made. Avoid at all costs.

Tough Grader
1.0
3.0
ENGR145
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Nov 14, 2018
Wouldn't take again

The worst professor the halls of Case Western Reserve University. Lost multiple students exams and gave them zeros because "one exam is dropped". Avoid at all costs. Does not teach, and over 70% of the class either dropped it or failed.

Tough Grader
4.0
4.0
ENGR145
Grade: B
Nov 19, 2018
Would take again

Fair professor. If you pay attention during lecture and work through the homework with a decent understanding, you'll be fine. What you get out of this class is what you put in. Don't expect an easy A or B. I also appreciated his style of lecturing.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Inspirational
5.0
4.0
EMSE504
Grade: D
Jan 22, 2023
Would take again

Prof. Matthiesen is the fairest grader I've ever had. The exams closely resemble the homework and classwork. Homework is due before the lecture that covers the content so you will have to read ahead in the textbook, but it's a good textbook.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Hilarious
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

17%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

89% confidence
Based on 13 grades
Most common grades:
B (5)
Not sure yet (4)
A (3)
Grade Distribution
A(3)B(5)C(2)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 18 reported grades
B: 5
Not sure yet: 4
A: 3
C: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (15)
TEST HEAVY (9)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (7)
Get ready to read (6)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (4)
Inspirational (2)
Caring (1)
Clear grading criteria (1)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.51 avg change
Jan
Feb
Apr
May
Nov
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENDR145

5.0

(1)

EMSE201

5.0

(1)

EMSE504

5.0

(1)

EMSEALL

4.0

(1)

EMSE202

3.5

(2)
+5 more courses
Difficulty by Course

EMSE280

5.0

GRAD

5.0

ENGR145

4.0

EMSEALL

4.0

EMSE504

4.0

Similar Professors