3.4

David Seljak

Social Science - University of Waterloo

3.4
Quality
2.8
Difficulty
80%
Would Retake
97
Reviews
3.4
Quality
2.8
Difficulty
3.3
Helpful
3.5
Clarity

80%

Would Retake

97

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

29

4

28

3

16

2

16

1

8

What Students Say

By far the most boring class I have ever taken

RS101 - 2.0 rating

Was consistently late

RS100 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

75%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

59% confidence
Based on 3 grades
Most common grades:
Not_Sure_Yet (1)
Incomplete (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 5 reported grades
Not_Sure_Yet: 1
Incomplete: 1
A+: 1
A: 1
Common Tags
Hilarious (2)
Respected (1)
Caring (1)
Gives good feedback (1)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (1)
Amazing lectures (1)
Tough grader (1)
Get ready to read (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.14 avg change
Dec
Apr
Jul
Jan
May
Aug
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

100

5.0

(1)

VARIOUS

5.0

(1)

SOC101J

5.0

(1)

RS100E

5.0

(1)

RS100LRS100A

5.0

(1)
+16 more courses
Difficulty by Course

RS101

5.0

101

4.0

REL100A

4.0

RS102

4.0

RS230

3.3

Reviews (97)
5.0
2.0
RS100L
Sep 10, 2001

Most all-encompassing, relevant, insightful, life changing course I ever took.

5.0
3.0
VARIOUS
Sep 10, 2001

Great prof. Clear. Fair. Best when he creates discussion. A must for Arts stu

5.0
1.0
SOC101
Oct 22, 2001

No Comments

2.0
1.0
SOC101
Nov 2, 2001

Know-it-all, condescending and actually picks favourites.

5.0
3.0
SOC101
Nov 25, 2001

Jokes r some wat funny, class discussions r great

5.0
3.0
SOC101
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Jan 7, 2002

funny

5.0
1.0
SOC101
Jan 30, 2002

Excellent teaching/dialog. Ignores pointless questions asked by students. Nice!

3.0
4.0
RS100L
Feb 4, 2002

somewhat condescending but created an interesting course

5.0
1.0
SOC101J
Feb 12, 2002

AMAZING prof!! Really enjoyed his class! Made up for Demarco's stupidity!

4.0
1.0
RS100A
Grade: Incomplete
Feb 28, 2002

Arrogant to a fault...but at least he admits it. His tests are simple stuff.

2.0
3.0
HIST235
Mar 23, 2002

Spends too much time digressing.

3.0
3.0
RS100A
Mar 24, 2002

Very condescending when he helps, constant corny sex jokes.

4.0
2.0
SOC101
Mar 25, 2002

easy tests, assignments can be done 30 mins before class

3.0
1.0
SOC101
Mar 26, 2002

gets off topic, sex jokes, easy assignments

2.0
4.0
101
Grade: A+
Mar 28, 2002

Boring, dull, goes on and on about nothing...

3.0
3.0
RS100A
Mar 28, 2002

I like his passion for this course and his humour

3.0
2.0
RS100A
Apr 5, 2002

No Comments

3.0
3.0
RS101A
Apr 8, 2002

dry humor

4.0
1.0
RS100L
Apr 12, 2002

Very well organized and prepared for lectures. Easy assignments/tests.

5.0
1.0
SOC101
Apr 13, 2002

No Comments

3.0
4.0
RS100A
May 15, 2002

No Comments

5.0
1.0
RS100A
Oct 17, 2002

Great prof! Very creative with presenting the course information.

2.0
1.0
RS
Dec 9, 2002

Rude and arrogant. Didn't learn anything really, but assignments were easy..

4.0
3.0
SOC101
Jan 23, 2003

thought-provoking dialogue. He's not arrogant, you're just stupid.

5.0
1.0
RS100E
May 6, 2003

the guy's voice might be a bit boring but his dialogue is pretty engaging if you're interested in the course.

3.0
4.0
RS100L
Oct 23, 2003

His lectures were utterly boring. His tests were somewhat nausiating. Going to class was an overall hassle.

5.0
2.0
SOC101
Oct 28, 2003

got me hooked in soc... he's hilarious and enjoys the class... he is arrogant but i love it!! wicked!

2.0
5.0
RS100L
Nov 3, 2003

Worst class ever. Hard. Boring. Repetitive.

5.0
1.0
RS100L
Feb 10, 2004

he is the best prof ever,so fricikin cool

4.0
1.0
RS100L
Feb 20, 2004

Somewhat repetitive and can be condescending at times, but interesting, engaging material. The tests were a bit tough, expecting you to remember minutae of something he glossed over two weeks previously.

1.0
4.0
RS100L
Feb 25, 2004

Going to his religons class at night was honestly like torture. The minutes creeped by. The tests got into way to much detail, and he gave them to you at the end of a lecture with that same material on it. If you don't want to be BORED to death, stay away

5.0
3.0
RS100L
Mar 5, 2004

A great guy, with interesting and thought provoking material but has hard assignments and his tests include little details of things we didn't cover in detail.

2.0
3.0
RS100L
Mar 8, 2004

He never stopped talking about one topic and he kept with it through the whole term. He would relate everything back to this one topic. He is also very disorganized.. but he is a nice man

3.0
3.0
RS100A
Mar 10, 2004

Worst, most boring class ever! This prof stands and the front and tortures you for 3 hours. Tests are needlessly hard. He knows his material well, but I would reccommend not taking this class.

5.0
3.0
100
Mar 11, 2004

Very good lecturer with a sense of humour and a passion for world religions. Very approachable and helpful. I do agree that his tests tend to trick you with minor details. And what's the deal with giving exams at the END of a lecture??

5.0
1.0
RS230
Mar 12, 2004

Great Prof!

1.0
5.0
RS100L
Mar 31, 2004

I don't know how this guy made it into McLeans for one of UWs top profs. Very dull classes and readings. Tests are also difficult. Is a nice guy and smart but he cant teach!!!!! DON'T TAKE A CLASS HIM HIM!!!

4.0
2.0
RS100A
Apr 29, 2004

Clearly outlined lectures with lecture notes. Trys to throw in a joke here and there to switch things up. Tests are very reasonable and material interesting.

5.0
4.0
RS100A
Jun 20, 2004

very helpful! lectures are sometimes boring but he tries to make it more interesting. I took this course as a bird course but much to my surprise it was harder than i thought it was. nice teacher.

2.0
4.0
RS230
Jun 21, 2004

An interesting course, but he made it very boring and seemed to frequently repeat the same topics. His tests were not a fair assessment of what was covered in class and were therefore very difficult.A nice man, but bad teacher, very condescending.

4.0
3.0
RS100L
Jul 24, 2004

Great prof: goes over exactly what is going to be on each test. Looks like he could be a part of Hair Club for Men. HOT! Some difficult/boring readings, but generally awesome :)

5.0
1.0
RS
Jul 31, 2004

yeah, he's a hotty in that tweedy, Volvo-driving, bearded professor sort of way. snarky devil, which is appropriate for the course he teaches.

2.0
4.0
RS100L
Sep 7, 2004

passionate about the subject, but he could do more to make it interesting. tests are very difficult. make sure you do the readins and actually understand them. this is important. know the important people from the readings, and what they said!!

4.0
2.0
RS100L
Oct 28, 2004

he is awesome, very good lecturer. he is passionate and knows his information! make sure to do the readings and attend lectures and you will do awesome!! no final for the class, wohoo!

1.0
5.0
RS230
Nov 11, 2004

I hated this prof. One of the worst I had. It seems like you either like him or hate him. I definitely hated him, and will never take another class with him. The tests were hard and the paper was even worse

3.0
4.0
RS100L
Nov 23, 2004

Nice guy, but expects way too much for a first year course. Ridiculous how he has a manditory class the night of Halowe'en, EVERY YEAR! I think I learned more about his family than the actual evil in the world (I really don't need to know how you had to check your kids for worms)

5.0
2.0
RS100L
Nov 24, 2004

AWESOME PROF, he teaches very well...very smart respect the man fully

4.0
3.0
RS100L
Nov 26, 2004

An excellent person 2 b teaching a RS clas Doesn't shove one particular religion down ur throat.intellegent, knows his stuff funny genuinely nice person passionate. this course is reallllllyyy interesting.even life altering.dont worry not 2 difficult once u go 2 class & do the reading u will b fine.

4.0
2.0
RS100L
Jan 6, 2005

Not a bad class, but not that interesting either. I didn't go to many classes and still got a fairly decent mark.

4.0
4.0
RS100L
Feb 14, 2005

this course was harder than i anticipated.. still it is interesting.

3.0
4.0
RS100L
Apr 11, 2005

Not being educated in any type of religion, I found this course extremely hard, and my final mark will relect it. The course description led me to believe the course would handle different material. Good Prof though, approachable and friendly, always there for questions. Good sense of humour!

1.0
5.0
RS100L
Apr 14, 2005

WORST PROF EVER!!! its funny how he teaches religion but is the meanest person ever!! i found it quite ironic! he needs to be in another profession...he is brutal as a prof! i will NEVER take another course with him ever! even if he was the last prof on the planet

5.0
2.0
RS100L
Apr 18, 2005

Great prof, lots of jokes, lots of laughs. Interesting course material, and he thankfully doesnt push any religion over the others. Tests were pretty easy, but the assignments are marked pretty hard

3.0
4.0
RS100L
Apr 26, 2005

Much harder than anticipated and in my opinion, the T.As were overly harsh. Still, intriguing and thought provoking. One of those 'classic-movie-type' classes you see in the movies.

2.0
3.0
RS100L
May 11, 2005

I think he's a very arrogant prof. He had a pleasant lecturing demeanor, but once in a while he'd say something that would be a little too off-colour to be a joke. The tests were ridiculous, every other question had an "all of the above/none of the above", I think that's lazy item writing.

5.0
3.0
RS100L
Jun 22, 2005

One of the best profs i have had; Funny, tells jokes, intresting, easy to talk to, helpful...I took other RS classes hoping they would live up to this one, but they came no where close!

5.0
3.0
RS100L
Dec 4, 2005

Very clear about what he expects on tests and papers, lectures are always interesting, and he is absolutely hilarious to boot. I'll certainly take another class of his.

5.0
2.0
RS100L
Dec 5, 2005

Wonderful. He was an excellent prof, very clear on what he wanted especially on assignments which made it alot easier. I will deffinetly take another one of his classes.

3.0
4.0
RS100L
Dec 11, 2005

do good on his papers because his tests will****you.

5.0
3.0
RS100LRS100A
Jan 19, 2006

He's a passionate teacher who actually cares about students - he wants you to do well and learn. Amazing teacher.

4.0
3.0
RS100L
Jan 25, 2006

Class ended up being not what I expected, but he does give you a pretty clear view of what you should know for his tests/papers. No exam is a plus. Lectures a little dry, but otherwise it was a descent experience, for what was eventually offered. Don't believe the course description though...

5.0
2.0
RS100AANDL
Feb 18, 2006

Really good teacher. Tells funny jokes that I write in the margin so I can tell them to people later. He's good looking for an older man.

4.0
2.0
RS100L
Mar 23, 2006

Good prof. Funny guy. If you do the readings you should do fine. Classes are kinda interesting but after an hour its hard to pay attention. Tests are ok.

5.0
3.0
RS100
Jun 21, 2006

he tries to be funny and can be at times

4.0
2.0
RS100
Oct 5, 2006

Overall good experience in his evil class. Content was interesting. A good speaker, with good clarity and for the most part gets to his point. Tests are overall easy if lectures were attended and readings read. No major surprises. Class recommended.

2.0
4.0
RS100L
Oct 30, 2006

I found it very hard to will myself to attend his class. Both he and the readings are dreadfully repetetive without making the meaning any clearer. He also tries way too hard to be funny and will often stall his lecture for a couple of minutes until someone laughs at his jokes. The material was horribly boring, and made even worse by him.Don't take

4.0
1.0
RS100L
Jan 10, 2007

good prof - interesting enough - tests were easy but the TA's were pretty harsh in marking papers ...

4.0
3.0
RS100
Jan 29, 2007

Seljak was very funny, he tries to relate to his students. The content was interesting but it can be difficult because the terms are foreign. You should read the textbook and go to class.

4.0
3.0
RS100A
Apr 16, 2007

The tests were super easy if u read over the lecture notes, but the assignment was marked completely unfairly. He jokes a lot his classes were interesting but, ya DO NOT blow off the assignment as easy just bcus the tests are. I'd take it again, the txt is good too.

2.0
4.0
REL100A
Apr 21, 2007

He was funny... take evil instead

2.0
4.0
RS100A
Apr 21, 2007

the course it self blew and the readings were extremly confusing,he didnt really clear anything up he just pretty much re read the book which was no help The movies were awful and hard to take note on what was important he also tried to be funny which granted sometimes he was but kinda grew tiersome by the end I also felt he was hard/unfair marker

2.0
4.0
RS102
Jan 16, 2008

I personally hated his class. His lectures were useless and put me to sleep.

4.0
2.0
RS100
Mar 25, 2008

I had him for Religions of the East first then took his Evil class just because he was teaching it - it turned out to be really interesting and thought provoking. I think he is a great professor.

4.0
1.0
RS100A
May 12, 2008

He is entertaining in class, however he does mispronounce a lot of the names in the text. The term assignment is marked super hard. HINT: For the tests know his course slides very well, most of the questions are straight off his slides. Also if he shows a video take notes, he loves to put lots of questions from videos.

4.0
4.0
RS112
Nov 6, 2008

Not 100% on the course code, but it was Evil in winter 2006. This guy is great...I learned a lot. Tricky tricky with the changing of the course name to attract more attn! ...do the readings, respect his class (he once told a girl her outfit was too racy for class...my hero.

2.0
4.0
RS100
Apr 19, 2009

this class was death. m/c test based mostly on lectures. not good test of your actual knowledge. took 2 weeks to get back to me on whether or not i could rewrite the essay. no final. blah, boring.

1.0
5.0
RS100A
Apr 20, 2009

He tries really hard to get students' attention by returning tests LATE. Late as in weeks after. But he got two TAs to help him. It was supposed to be a simple course but his M/C questions are very hard. I felt like taking a level 300 course. He thinks he's so good by not responding to my email. That's why he's stuck in Waterloo for his whole life.

4.0
1.0
RS112
Jun 28, 2009

I took evil in fall 2005 and this was by far the easiest first year course I've ever done. 3 tests, no exam, no paper= golden! After i finished he sent asked me to switch my major to RS. Some of the books were dry and he expects a Christian background from his students and is unwilling to explain theology that should be aparent. I got 89 easily.

2.0
4.0
RS121
Nov 1, 2010

Found his lectures have no flow, it's difficult to follow what he's talking about. Tests are pretty hard, 31 multiple choice questions and 20 minutes to answer them. Can be funny at times, very dry sense of humour though. TA marked the papers really hard.

3.0
4.0
RS121
Nov 7, 2010

Unfair exams, it's a lot of material for a few MC questions and not a lot of time to do it in. I feel like the classes could be more interesting though, the things he talks about have the potential to be interesting, but class tends to be boring. And its a lot of reading.

4.0
3.0
RS121
Dec 10, 2010

Evil was the birdiest bird course in the history of bird courses. Skipped about 70% of his lectures, still passed easily. Just skim over his lecture notes, and take guesses on the tests. He himself is rather funny, but the topics are so boring. Take evil if you want an easy pass with little work.

4.0
2.0
RS121
Feb 9, 2011

Evil was a good class. Try to make it to lectured for bonus questions on tests, but you can easily rely on his powerpoints (provided on ACE). You don't have to read everything, but make sure you do a good skim of the material for testing. Funny and entertaining in class, but can often get off track...which is sometimes a welcome break.

3.0
5.0
RS100
Mar 20, 2011

Hard tests, yet they mainly focus on overall concepts; however many questions are arbitrary, and you will end up scoring lower because you forgot a little detail. He tries to make things interesting, but sometimes drags on. Was consistently late. Hard marker - low class average.

2.0
5.0
RS101
Mar 29, 2011

By far the most boring class I have ever taken. If I had known that this was not a bird course, I would not have taken it. So much reading for a 30 question M.C. test!

4.0
2.0
RS121
Dec 15, 2011

I took RS121 online but I must say it was my best class! Dr. Seljak possesses great clarity when explaining and pronounces words/names perfectly fine. He likes to relate things to the students level to make it easier for us to understand concepts. Slides are very important so make sure to pay close attention because questions are very precise.

4.0
4.0
RS121
Jun 5, 2012

Super interesting course although IT IS NOT EASY! Tons of readings and the tests are stupidly and randomly detailed. The material is very interesting (especially to a PACS major) but this is NOT a bird course. Way too hard to be first year. I'm third year and I had to work harder in this course than any other I was taking at the time.

4.0
3.0
RS121
Nov 8, 2012

He's an amazing prof. He's really funny as well. So helpful. Tough course because there are A LOT of readings. He's very fair in marking tests and assignments. He takes attendance (worth 10%) but it motivates you to come to class for easy marks.

5.0
2.0
RSA
Nov 21, 2012

Class is super easy if you actually attend class. There are a lot of readings but I didn't actually read them and I still got an A. Test questions are a bit ambiguous which makes them kind of hard. Two small assignments which are from the readings. Take this class!

5.0
2.0
RS121
Feb 19, 2013

Really good prof. Would make sure that material was understood before continuing. Although it is a Religious Studies course, the religious component is small. Which is nice. He is also easy to reach most of the time. Great Class!

1.0
5.0
RS121
Dec 1, 2013

Lecturer is either too slow or too fast in his speech. The slides don't seem to flow well with his narrating. The worst part of this course is the exams. Way too specific, and not enough time (30 minutes to answer 30 questions). Do not take his online courses.

3.0
3.0
RS100
Dec 20, 2013

Great professor! There were 5 tests worth 20% each in the class. So as long as you study the lecture material and read the textbook then it's very possible to get an A+ in the course. I definitely recommend taking this course with him!

1.0
4.0
RS100
Apr 25, 2015

boring, rude, and offensive when he thinks he is being funny. Not helpful at all, tells you you're on the right track then fails you for what you wrote. ignores emails, takes attendance every class. tells students he doesn't understand why they can't get it when everyone else can when they go to him for help, etc. wouldn't recommend

4.0
3.0
RS121
Jul 24, 2016
Would take again

The content is super interesting and you can get pretty much all of it just from the lectures. The larger reading for the final paper is extremely necessary to read, but I did well (high 80s) with only skimming one or two of the others

4.0
3.0
HIST235
Jan 1, 2017
Would take again

Love him! One of my favourite profs!

Respected
Hilarious
Caring
5.0
3.0
RS100
Jan 9, 2017
Would take again

He is an amazing professor! I definitely recommend taking any course that he is teaching. His lecture slides are clear and concise. He is available after class and during office hours to answer questions or have a discussion on any topic.

Gives good feedback
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Amazing lectures
5.0
2.0
RS100
Grade: A
May 15, 2021
Would take again

Awesome professor, very knowledgeable. Took a few of his courses and wish I could take more. He's an awesome lecturer who keeps your interest and has many bad dad jokes up his sleeve. His classes are very enjoyable and he will respect your difference of opinion (at least to your face).

Hilarious
1.0
2.0
SOC101
Grade: A-
Aug 4, 2025

His lectures are incredibly boring and dry. Goes on tangents or even forgets what is being talked about. I don't wanna be ageist but he is occupying employment for someone who actually needs it. His feedback was poor, he is unhelpful and judgmental when you ask for help. Sociology is an easy subject, but he makes it hard.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

75%

Textbook Required

83%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

59% confidence
Based on 3 grades
Most common grades:
Not_Sure_Yet (1)
Incomplete (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 5 reported grades
Not_Sure_Yet: 1
Incomplete: 1
A+: 1
A: 1
Common Tags
Hilarious (2)
Respected (1)
Caring (1)
Gives good feedback (1)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (1)
Amazing lectures (1)
Tough grader (1)
Get ready to read (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.14 avg change
Dec
Apr
Jul
Jan
May
Aug
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

100

5.0

(1)

VARIOUS

5.0

(1)

SOC101J

5.0

(1)

RS100E

5.0

(1)

RS100LRS100A

5.0

(1)
+16 more courses
Difficulty by Course

RS101

5.0

101

4.0

REL100A

4.0

RS102

4.0

RS230

3.3

Similar Professors