1.8

David Zax

Science - Cornell University

1.8
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
33%
Would Retake
92
Reviews
1.8
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
1.7
Helpful
1.9
Clarity

33%

Would Retake

92

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

4

4

10

3

6

2

31

1

41

What Students Say

His lectures don't relate to any of his homework sets and are very sporadically taught in general

CHEM2090 - 1.0 rating

David Zax just has a chip on his shoulders

CHEM2070 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

8%

Textbook Required

88%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

77% confidence
Based on 9 grades
Most common grades:
A (3)
B (2)
B+ (2)
Grade Distribution
A(3)B(2)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(3)
Based on 10 reported grades
A: 3
B: 2
B+: 2
Not sure yet: 1
Common Tags
Tough Grader (1)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (1)
Lots of homework (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.19 avg change
Dec
Jan
Apr
Feb
Jun
May
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHEM211

4.3

(3)

CHEM303

4.0

(1)

CHEM2070

2.4

(34)

CHEM3030

2.3

(3)

CHEM300

1.7

(6)
+6 more courses
Difficulty by Course

CHEM207

5.0

CHEM208

4.5

CHEM793

4.3

CHEM300

4.2

2070

4.0

Reviews (92)
5.0
3.0
CHEM211
Feb 17, 2003

Good lecture, done with a sense of humor. Tests were a bit hard.

4.0
2.0
CHEM211
May 2, 2003

Tests were hard, but he's a good lecturer.

4.0
2.0
CHEM211
Oct 26, 2003

the final was indeed ridiculous, but lectures, hw, and labs weren't that bad. chem sucks less with zax

1.0
3.0
CHEM793
Feb 12, 2004

No Comments

1.0
4.0
CHEM793
Feb 17, 2004

Chem793 was "a nice course screwed up!" with Zax.

1.0
5.0
CHEM793
Feb 17, 2004

I am very surprised to see such a professor at Cornell. Cornell is an outstanding institution and should not allow such ineptitude to permeate a fine department. He does no research and does not know what he is talking about.

1.0
5.0
CHEM793
Feb 17, 2004

No Comments

3.0
3.0
CHEM300
Oct 14, 2004

I guess he's an intelligent guy...but seems rather full of himself. Needs to tone it down a bit.

1.0
4.0
CHEM300
Oct 22, 2004

not very helpful and has a condenscending attitude toward the whole class.

2.0
3.0
CHEM300
Oct 31, 2004

"I suspect" that Zax may care less about his students than he cares for a broken beaker. He should subject his procedures for running the class to some error analysis. The CO2 didn't work. The fats lab doesn't seem to be working either. Lectures could be half as long if he didn't use so many words!

1.0
5.0
CHEM300
Nov 30, 2005

Zax thinks that he is the most eloquent guy in the world, but really his wordy lab writeups are full of distracting grammatical/syntactical errors. His labs are SO sloppy. Keeps telling us to do our work "like we were getting paid for it". You ARE getting paid to do this and you suck! So many fine profs at Cornell Chem, why ruin 300 with this moron

1.0
5.0
CHEM300
Jan 6, 2006

No Comments

2.0
5.0
CHEM300
Jan 18, 2007

Very wordy and confusing tests. Avoid him if you want to keep your GPA!

2.0
3.0
CHEM209
Oct 10, 2007

Zax has no idea what he's talking about. spends all his time explaining what he won't be teaching, tell awful jokes.

1.0
3.0
CHEM209
Nov 1, 2007

What can i say... Zax makes things harder than they are.

1.0
5.0
CHEM209
Nov 8, 2007

Perhaps the most useless lecturer in existence. His jokes are tasteless; his notes have nothing to do with the class. 5 minutes into the lecture, you'd ask yourself, "WHY THE HELL AM I STILL HERE?" If that doesn't say enough, he also likes to smirk at his students while they're taking the ridiculous prelims, knowing they will fail miserably.

1.0
5.0
CHEM209
Nov 10, 2007

Must be the most useless soul living on God's Green Earth. Spends lectures ranting about the history of chemistry rather than chemistry itself. He must have an inferiority complex or something, he talks to us as if we are dog crap. I have never run into a more worthless teacher in my life.

1.0
4.0
CHEM209
Nov 11, 2007

prelims test reading comprehension more than actual chemistry. the textbook is a saving grace because lectures are pointless.

2.0
5.0
CHEM209
Nov 12, 2007

Yuck. I do not recommend Zax. He seems like he's a really nice guy, and I think that I could approach him with questions fairly easily but its the only lecture that I've skipped more than twice. Boring and pretty much useless lectures. No review sessions, prelims are horrible and you are very unprepared, even if you study what he teaches.

2.0
4.0
CHEM209
Nov 12, 2007

Zax reminds me of a kid that has no friends and he likes to rant about Nobel Prize winners. If you didn't take AP Chem in high school good luck!

2.0
4.0
CHEM209
Dec 11, 2007

Not a great lecturer. Doesn't cover material that appears on the prelim. The prelims aren't terrible (the final however, was fairly difficult). Textbook is great though and is basically the only thing you need to do alright. Overall, course is pretty easy, but Zax is not organized and you probably won't do any worse if you skip every lecture.

2.0
5.0
CHEM209
Dec 20, 2007

Helpful when I went to office hours, but the lectures were almost completely pointless, and the exams were basically tests in making stuff up and hoping it made sense. Half the class stopped going to lectures by the end.

2.0
3.0
CHEM209
Dec 24, 2007

For the most part, Zax's exams are measurements of God-given Chemistry brilliance, and studying is pointless. The textbook was a savior for this class, as lectures were pointless and the overall class attendance reflected this. It seemed like Zax would rather be doing research than lecturing.

1.0
5.0
CHEM209
Dec 24, 2007

terrible teacher, please do not take him if you have the option...he is a terrible lecturer and the prelims never cover material that was covered in class...

2.0
3.0
CHEM209
Dec 28, 2007

not a very goos lecturer. all you can do is read the text and sit in on some of the 207 lectures. also, no practice prelims for this course, so try stealing some problem sets from your 207 buddies for practice. prelims and final very hard

2.0
2.0
CHEM209
Dec 29, 2007

Zax isn't too bad. Lecture is essentially the book but more confusing. Labs are easy, tests are a curve ball, though not impossible. It's clear that Zax doesn't want to be there, but he knows you don't either so everything is ok! Overall I'd rather take this course than 207 (which is much harder and you have to do lab write ups).

2.0
2.0
CHEM209
Jan 22, 2008

After taking CHEM 209 I felt I'm fooled... The lectures are not that bad, but unfortunately Prof.Z does not like including what he said in the exams. Wish you good luck if you really really want to take his course.

2.0
4.0
CHEM208
Mar 13, 2008

My suggestion if you are required to take this course? Wait until it gets taken over by a new professor. Being one of the few people who actually attended lecture and came in with a really good background, the prelims were still pretty tough thanks to Zax's mean-lowering exam questions that seem to have nothing to do with what we're learning

1.0
5.0
CHEM209
Jun 1, 2008

Bad prof, clearly does not want to teach. Avoid taking this course in the fall so you can avoid this guy! Some other better prof teaches in the spring; Zax teaches in the fall

1.0
5.0
CHEM2090
Nov 19, 2008

Easily the worst professor I have ever had, and I've had my fair share of bad teachers. This guy has no desire to hand his knowledge to his students, he's too full of himself and his previous research to even care about his students learning. Don't bother going to lecture, reading the book and going to AEW will save you in this course.

2.0
5.0
CHEM2090
Dec 20, 2008

Needs to work on clarity, and making labs more relevant. Also needs to understand that no one takes chemistry by choice, everyone is there because its required.

2.0
2.0
CHEM2090
Jan 13, 2009

Does not care about students. Tricky exams with many application questions.

1.0
3.0
CHEM2090
Feb 4, 2009

Zax removed all of my interest in chemistry. If he spent as much time actually teaching as puffing out his chest then we would possibly learn something. And his incapability at both teaching and demonstrations degrades my perception of Cornell.

1.0
5.0
CHEM209
Feb 28, 2009

Very helpful, great teaching style and wit. Readily available for assistance on otherwise complicated concepts. He was also voted best prof by the students for the past two years. Highly recommended!

2.0
4.0
CHEM209
Apr 5, 2009

Unwilling to help students during office hours. Dodges questions and acts condescendingly toward students. His tests have very low means. If you haven't taken AP Chemistry in high school, then you will have a lot of trouble passing this course.

1.0
5.0
CHEM208
Apr 11, 2009

Demolished my interest in chemistry. Taught useless information that was not even related to chemistry and expected you to know the information.

2.0
5.0
CHEM2090
Apr 11, 2009

If you like lectures that go on random tangents that have nothing to do with the tests, Professor Zax is the teacher for you! Worst at Cornell thus far. If you have no chemistry experience, you will likely have a very difficult time.

2.0
3.0
CHEM3030
May 25, 2009

Zax is an amazing individual. His ability to confuse is perhaps second to none. His ability to crush the soul is also unparalleled. Since he can't be avoided, he must be endured...

1.0
4.0
CHEM2090
Jun 11, 2009

Rather useless professor.

4.0
3.0
CHEM303
Jul 20, 2009

He is a good teacher who is willing to answer questions. I learned many things from the cores and it stimulated my interest in the subject greatly.

2.0
2.0
CHEM2090
Aug 1, 2009

Definitely not the best teacher, prelim means were always low, but didn't have to do much work to get above the mean on everything. Zax acts like he doesn't want to be there during class and his demonstrations NEVER worked. Didn't get much chemistry knowledge from him, but overall the class is boring, but not too hard.

1.0
4.0
CHEM2090
Aug 19, 2009

Horrible teacher

2.0
4.0
CHEM2070
Nov 9, 2009

Worst professor I've ever had. Managed to confuse the entire lecture hall almost every class.

1.0
4.0
CHEM2070
Dec 16, 2009

Very disappointing that almost every science related major will have to take 2070. Tests take 2/3 of the alotted time to comprehend and have little based on what he actually lectured on. No understanding of his students knowledge level before or after the course. This is coming from someone who went to lecture and did pretty well in the class.

2.0
4.0
CHEM2070
Dec 17, 2009

Terribly teacher. Arrogant, annoying, and overall, useless. I learned nothing from this man.

2.0
4.0
CHEM2070
Dec 17, 2009

This class was brutal. There are so many assignments due for a four credit class and there really needs to be more lecture time. Zax also was very confusing and his exams were completely off topic sometimes.

1.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Dec 19, 2009

Dave Zax is possibly the most arrogant, condescending, and rude man I've ever had the misfortune to meet. He acts as if students are appalling pieces of filth and don't deserve anything more than disdain and hatred. I wish no other student would have to endure the unfortunate circumstances that are his class.

1.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Dec 27, 2009

Most confusing lecture prof ever... the times that I could manage to stay awake. The material covered in lecture was not covered in the homework problems. And the final was ridiculous.

1.0
2.0
CHEM2090
Jan 7, 2010

Horrible teacher. Horrible Experience. Unhelpful. Arrogant. Mean.

1.0
5.0
CHEM207
Jan 14, 2010

This man is a TERRIBLE professor. He doesn't really know what he is talking about and gets corrected often during lecture, especially by his superior, Prof. Lee. In order to do well, one must teach themselves. Consider this class to be "auto-tutorial". Lectures don't correlate to masterinchemistry.com work, written homework, or exams.

1.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Jan 20, 2010

He is a horrible teacher. The TA's seemed to be better at teaching than he is. The final exam was a killer!

3.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Mar 25, 2010

Horrible teacher. The exams were unpredictable - the means were either really high or ridiculously low. Probably one of the worst college professors I have ever had.

5.0
1.0
CHEM2070
Sep 8, 2011

DAVEEEEEEEEEEE! This man is the epitome of what a teacher should be. He obviously loves his work, his family, and his religion. I wish I could be Dave.

3.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Nov 9, 2011

He tries to teach concepts the way they were discovered (i.e. explaining how things like orbitals are derived mathematically) when it would be clearer and easier to learn the material if he just presented facts. Don't ask questions in class, he talks down to people a lot. Go to TAs and tutors with problems, they are very helpful.

1.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Nov 30, 2011

Dry, teaches inaccurate models without indicating they are inaccurate until the very end. So, a lot of time is wasted when it could be spent focusing on things that work.

4.0
1.0
CHEM2070
Dec 6, 2011

Not a bad professor, just a bit condescending towards students. Honestly, the material was really easy and there is no reason you should do bad in the course since you have TAs and whatnot to help you.

2.0
4.0
CHEM2070
Dec 7, 2011

Finds a way to 'explain' concepts in the single most confusing way. Lectures tend to wander, but can provide useful examples; sometimes will give away a test answer. He's a bit of egoist, but play into it and he'll be nicer to you.

5.0
1.0
CHEM2070
Dec 19, 2011

Zax isn't as bad as everyone says... yeah the final was pretty bad but it was curved, so it doesn't really matter. The prelims were very fair and easy if you were prepared. Not the greatest teacher, but the help was there if necessary.

2.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Jan 24, 2012

This man is awful. Don't ask questions in lecture unless you want him to pulverize you in front of every person in class. Don't go to office hours, he'll just do the same thing in private. In exams, he seems to delight in watching tears run slowly down students faces (true story). Labs and exams have zero to do with lecture. Even my TA hated him.

1.0
4.0
CHEM2070
May 6, 2012

He is a horrible professor. Most likely the worst professor at cornell. Every single person i know absolutely hates his lectures as they are utterly useless. His prelims and finals are completely unfair. The problem sets are long a ridiculous.

2.0
4.0
CHEM2070
Nov 8, 2012

His office hours and not great and he is a bit arrogant. Overall the rumors are over blown, he isn't the absolute worse.

1.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Dec 8, 2012

One of the worst professors at Cornell. Dry lectures, bad at teaching, and unwilling to give clarification when asked.

4.0
2.0
CHEM2070
Dec 14, 2012

Zax's lectures were clear, HW was helpful and tests were fair. Some test means were on the low end, but the thing with chemistry is that the lectures give you a basis of knowledge but it is up to you to apply this knowledge on practice problems. Know your stoichiometry well because it is an easy concept that they can write tricky questions on

5.0
2.0
CHEM2070
Dec 17, 2012

The tests were very fair. Although the final may have been difficult, if one studies they should be fine. I had not taken AP Chem in high school but still managed an A

4.0
2.0
CHEM2070
Dec 17, 2012

Zax is an amazing teacher. Honestly, the rumors about him are way over exaggerated. Chem is a subject that you usually get or don't, but all in all, if you do the hw and pay attention in class you should be fine. He may be rude in office hours, but hey, there are so many other TA's you can go to if you really need the help.

3.0
2.0
CHEM2070
Dec 18, 2012

The test questions were similar to the problem set questions... so in terms of fairness, what else needs to be said? I ended up with an A- for what it's worth.

3.0
3.0
CHEM2070
Jan 2, 2013

Although he lacks a pleasant personality, he wasn't a bad prof. His lectures were somewhat challenging to follow but actually did explain things. I relied heavily on our book AND other chem books and did A LOT of practice problems in order to do well on the prelim and final. Hard work, but worth it.

3.0
3.0
CHEM2070
Jan 11, 2013

Not as bad as he is rumored to be. His homework problems were really hard and took a long time but often we were not tested on the harder material. Because of this his tests seemed annoying easy because we spent a lot of time studying and learning harder things that weren't on them. I never talked to him in person or read the book and I got a B+.

1.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Nov 20, 2013

The only thing I can say is "Avoid this man like the plague." He's very arrogant, doesn't care about students, and even revels in students suffering with the unnecessary difficulty of his assignments and exams. Stay away.

2.0
4.0
CHEM2070
Dec 11, 2013

Honestly, Zax is one of the crappiest professors I've ever come in contact with. He's arrogant, demeaning, and expects you to fully understand ridiculously complex subjects that only the kids who got fives on the AP exam have a slight understanding of. This class sucks, don't even waste your time going to lecture. You rely so much on the book.

1.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Dec 12, 2013

I guess the people saying he wasn't so bad are the ones who took AP Chem and got a 5 or something. The last time I took regents Chem was 2009, so maybe that's my fault. Anyway, terrible class, over analyzes material 'til it makes no sense, went to all lectures, didn't help, read the book completely, tests were totally different. Worst ever.

4.0
2.0
CHEM2070
Jan 6, 2014

I took this course in Fall 2013 with not prior AP chem (only regents chem in sophomore year). I got an A in the class but mostly because I went to the support class every week. The concepts were simple enough but Zax doesnt always explain everything in the allotted time. His lectures are better than Abruna's and I personally liked his exams better.

4.0
3.0
CHEM2070
Grade: B
Jan 16, 2014

Makes topics harder to understand than they should be. Prelim and homework questions are hard and not directly from the book and hard to study for. Material covered was not that hard but he did not teach it very clearly.

2.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Mar 23, 2014

Terrible professor. He is even rude to other professors and TAs. It's so unfortunate that almost every science major has to take this course

1.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Apr 24, 2014

He is a worse professor than Abruna. He presents the basic concepts in class, but expect students to know things to the very detail for homework and exams. His homework was unnecessarily difficult and not good for prelim preparation. He is rude and proud. The only way to do well is to study everything yourself and do a lot of problems.

2.0
4.0
CHEM2070
Dec 1, 2014

Ugh... Zax. He's just a really difficult test-giver. Doesn't seem friendly although I've never actually tired going to his office hours specifically. Enjoyed his lectures for the most part. It's not his fault chem 2070 is designed to weed people out. Be prepared to work hard.

1.0
5.0
2070
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 18, 2014

Very confusing lectures. Does not wait for the class to understand him. Tests are extremely difficult.

2.0
3.0
2070
Dec 28, 2014

Totally unapproachable and tough, but the stigma around Zax and 2070 is a bit overblown. I got an A in the class without taking AP Chem and while I worked for it, it's not necessary to go to office hours every week. Prelims are tough, but it's chemistry, so the means are gonna be low and the curve will help you.

2.0
5.0
CHEM2070
Grade: A
Jan 6, 2015

David Zax just has a chip on his shoulders. It seems that he is not only rude to students that approach him for help, but he is also horrible to the Department's grad students and other faculty members. Unfortunately, CHEM 2070 is a "weed out" class and a common requirement for many majors; so, it's either this or summer schoolchoose summer school

2.0
4.0
CHEM2070
May 6, 2015

All of the hype about Zax is completely exaggerated. He's nowhere near as cruel or intimidating as previous ratings state. That being said, his lectures are way too complicated, and his exams are tough (but not unfair). If you're an incoming freshman worried about this class, don't fear. The material is manageable if you read the textbook.

4.0
4.0
CHEM2090
Grade: A-
Aug 27, 2015

He is a great professor, and makes sure that students who need help can receive it. He is informative, and he tries to make this class fun.

1.0
3.0
CHEM2090
Oct 2, 2015

His lectures don't relate to any of his homework sets and are very sporadically taught in general. His lectures are often hard to follow, even if you know what you are doing. He has also describe the reason behind some chemistry to just be "magic." Questions during lecture have been answered with quick responses that don't clarify what was asked.

1.0
4.0
CHEM2090
Grade: B
Nov 13, 2015

Prof Zax's lectures are extremely unclear and often painful to attend. His power points look similar to something a 6th grader would create, he's not concise, and he often comes across as very condescending towards his students. Just read the textbook and do the problem sets. Labs are easy, prelims are not - "designed so no one would finish"...

1.0
5.0
CHEM2090
Dec 3, 2015

Lectures were absolutely terrible and because of that it's extremely hard to do the homeworks and tests. Impossible to pass the class without reading the book yourself and viewing Khan Academy videos. Would NOT recommend.

1.0
4.0
CHEM2090
Dec 10, 2015

Zax is unfortunately one of the worst teachers I have ever had. He has literally described concepts as magic and makes the simplest things confusing. His demos usually have nothing to do with the lecture of the day and he often messes them up. I generally enjoy chemistry but this was a very poor class.

2.0
5.0
CHEM2090
Jan 8, 2016

I thought I used to like chemistry. His lectures are incredibly unclear unless you already solidly know the material. His tests are tough, no doubt about that. Lectures seemed to be unrelated to homework or labs--studying the homework and textbooks are the key to passing. Was fairly condescending in class. Would not recommend.

1.0
4.0
CHEM2090
Grade: A
Jan 12, 2016

Everything I learned was from the textbook. I should have skipped 90 percent of the lectures.

1.0
5.0
CHEM2090
Grade: C
Apr 17, 2016

Terrible professor

1.0
5.0
CHEM2090
Grade: B+
Apr 24, 2016

Lectures were completely useless

1.0
4.0
CHEM2090
Grade: B+
Feb 2, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Purposely makes exams impossible to finish, lecture is useless, not helpful whatsoever

Tough Grader
4.0
4.0
CHEM3030
Jun 1, 2018
Would take again

Was extremely approachable throughout the course and usually available and willing to discuss any challenges/questions about lab. Vagueness in person and in handouts were sometimes confusing, but more often than not, also challenged me to learn more. His lectures went well beyond what was required for labs (apt for a class full of chemists).

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
1.0
4.0
CHEM3030
Grade: A
May 31, 2020
Wouldn't take again

he's mean. super snarky. igor was rough. he was always unnecessarily vague.

Lots of homework
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

8%

Textbook Required

88%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

77% confidence
Based on 9 grades
Most common grades:
A (3)
B (2)
B+ (2)
Grade Distribution
A(3)B(2)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(3)
Based on 10 reported grades
A: 3
B: 2
B+: 2
Not sure yet: 1
Common Tags
Tough Grader (1)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (1)
Lots of homework (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.19 avg change
Dec
Jan
Apr
Feb
Jun
May
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CHEM211

4.3

(3)

CHEM303

4.0

(1)

CHEM2070

2.4

(34)

CHEM3030

2.3

(3)

CHEM300

1.7

(6)
+6 more courses
Difficulty by Course

CHEM207

5.0

CHEM208

4.5

CHEM793

4.3

CHEM300

4.2

2070

4.0

Similar Professors