3.0

Deirdre Flynn

English - University of Toronto - St. George Campus

3.0
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
28%
Would Retake
141
Reviews
3.0
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
3.0
Helpful
2.9
Clarity

28%

Would Retake

141

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
141 total ratings

5

44

4

21

3

19

2

20

1

37

What Students Say

boring, going to class only for the in class work

ENG100 - 2.0 rating

Disorganized in lecture, never had a clear focus for lectures, and often got sidetracked

ENG100H1 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

47%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 26 grades
Most common grades:
Not sure yet (12)
A (11)
A- (5)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(2)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 44 reported grades
Not sure yet: 12
A: 11
A-: 5
A+: 4
Common Tags
Lots of homework (10)
Lecture heavy (9)
Get ready to read (7)
Caring (5)
So many papers (5)
Clear grading criteria (4)
EXTRA CREDIT (4)
Gives good feedback (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.74 avg change
Nov
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Oct
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENG101

5.0

(1)

ENG2B01

5.0

(1)

ENG328

5.0

(2)

ENG214

5.0

(2)

ENG213

5.0

(2)
+17 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENGA10

4.0

ENGBO7H3

4.0

ENGC44

4.0

ENG214

3.5

ENG100H

3.3

Reviews (139)
3.0
2.0
ENG182
Apr 9, 2002

No Comments

1.0
3.0
ENG182
Apr 9, 2002

No Comments

3.0
2.0
ENG182
Apr 23, 2002

Repeated herself a lot

1.0
3.0
ENG182
May 3, 2002

Horrible. She teachers a course on communication but needs one herself.

3.0
1.0
ENG182
Grade: C
May 9, 2002

course is so damn easy

1.0
1.0
ENG
May 9, 2002

No Comments

2.0
5.0
ENG182
Dec 9, 2002

don't go ever.. excruciating

4.0
1.0
ENG182
Dec 17, 2002

pefect time to sleep..

3.0
1.0
ENG182
Jan 15, 2003

Easy as hell course, not too bad on the eyes. Good time to sleep, or do homework

2.0
1.0
ENG182
Jan 16, 2003

english for engineers = (very anal prof) + (very boring class) --> skip alot

1.0
1.0
ENG182
Jan 19, 2003

No Comments

3.0
2.0
ENG182
Jan 30, 2003

Take your top off!

3.0
3.0
ENG182
Feb 12, 2003

BORING!!!!

1.0
1.0
ENG182
Feb 23, 2003

damn sexy... but really if u must go to class bring a pillow

1.0
1.0
ENG182
Mar 27, 2003

i'd she's good lookin... cna't really say anythin else. Dont read the text book... and those slides are COPYWRIGHTED! god forbid we get our hands on those..

4.0
1.0
ENG182
Apr 11, 2003

YOUNG BUT NOT HOT! She TRIES to make technical english interesting for engineers.... stop trying! Find a good TA like McGill.

5.0
3.0
ENG
Apr 12, 2003

No Comments

5.0
3.0
ENG100
Apr 12, 2003

She was very helpful and very approachable. Probably the best prof I had this year.

5.0
3.0
ENG182
Apr 14, 2003

Most boring class I've ever attended. Had to pry my eyes open in order to stay awake and absorb the material. Though, I wouldn't say that it's her fault that this course is so damn boring.

1.0
3.0
ENG182
Apr 20, 2003

CLASS IS BORING & USELESS.

5.0
2.0
ENG100
May 1, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
ENG182
Sep 10, 2003

**** but boring

5.0
2.0
ENG182
Sep 10, 2003

Very boring (mandatory) course. I think I attended like 3 lectures ... Anyhow, I think she's very good looking but she seems shy.

5.0
3.0
ENG100
Sep 11, 2003

genuinely cares for students...great prof!

4.0
3.0
ENG182
Oct 31, 2003

It's not the teachers fault I hate this course... I just hate english courses in general. She seems like a nice prof, but english is evil in my eyes. If you like english, she'd probably be a good prof to have.

5.0
3.0
ENG100
Nov 4, 2003

Very approachable prof who knows her material, and knows how to teach it too. :)

1.0
1.0
ENG182
Nov 5, 2003

This prof is 100% useless. She just keeps repeating herself and uses all the bad presentation gestures you're supposed to be taught to avoid in English class. Don't go to her lectures - better to stare aimlessly at the sky than to listen to her nonsense.

3.0
1.0
ENG182
Nov 13, 2003

They teach you how to throw paper airplanes in class.

4.0
3.0
ENG182
Nov 24, 2003

At first i didnt find the class useful, but then she began teaching on how to write memos. I feel that this is very important and useful material that we will need to know in the future.. she did a great job teaching the work.. i didnt have to read text.

5.0
1.0
ENG182
Nov 24, 2003

nice prof, actually cares about her job, but the course material is boring as hell, they think engineers have no english skills whatsoever...!!

5.0
1.0
ENG182
Dec 4, 2003

Boring material. She tries her best to get the students interest in the material (paper airplanes) and will go out of her way to help students (lab reports)

1.0
5.0
ENG182
Dec 6, 2003

Very sensitive

5.0
3.0
ENG100
Dec 10, 2003

Willing to provide individual assistance to students who desire it. Overall an effective professor.

3.0
3.0
ENG182
Dec 10, 2003

The class itself is the most worthless class ever. Its almost insulting. And the TA's suck, yet they're the ones grading you.

5.0
2.0
ENG100
Jan 2, 2004

very helpful prof and very approachable

5.0
2.0
ENG101
Feb 12, 2004

Helps improve English as evidenced by what I write now here

5.0
1.0
ENG182
Feb 22, 2004

No Comments

5.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: C+
Feb 22, 2004

A Very helpful Prof. for anyone who finds themselves very "scattered" in their writings. An all around great English professor! Thanks Prof. Flynn

4.0
1.0
ENG100
Mar 3, 2004

She's a very scattered lady. Sometimes, I just want to tell her to BREATHE. But overall, the class is an easy A!

5.0
1.0
ENG182S
Mar 31, 2004

I think she is a good teacher. People take her for granted. I think she is always in a hurry because she gets to class late and tries to catch up but she still manages to have some fun,especially the paper airplane contest. Keep up the great work!

5.0
1.0
ENG182
Grade: A-
Mar 31, 2004

SHE CARES!!! ENGLISH IS EASY AND FUN!!! I think we need more english training as engineers, we can't even argue on the course bullitin without resorting to threats and personal insults. SHE IS HOT (MUAHAHAHAHAHA)!! ENGLISH IS MY FAVOURATE SUBJECT

4.0
2.0
ENGLISH
Mar 31, 2004

I'm not sure why people have been such jerks to her in the past- Maybe I'm biased, being a writer in my spare time, but seriously- She's better and cares more than most all of our other profs. If you hate English, that's your own problem.

5.0
3.0
ENG182
Apr 1, 2004

I hope she has tears of joy after reading all the good comments for her. She basically told us in hidden messages to come here, and rate her. Flynn, Screw the faculty and give us a Higher Average than you are supposed to.

3.0
1.0
ENG182
Apr 1, 2004

She talked down to the class throughout the whole course. I learned nothing new, having known how to write an email. You feel like you are getting colser to death each minute in that class. An easy mark.

1.0
1.0
ENG182
Apr 1, 2004

She needs to cheer up, she wasn't very happy when she taught our engineering English class.

5.0
3.0
ENG182
Apr 2, 2004

Boring course!

5.0
1.0
ENG182
Apr 5, 2004

Makes you want to learn to impress her. Looking at her pretty face makes class worth every minute. My one and only sweetheart.

4.0
2.0
ENG182S
Apr 7, 2004

It is obvious she cares, doesnt stand up for herself when the class gets too rowdy....shes too nice. Gotta love her though.

2.0
1.0
ENG182
Apr 10, 2004

****ing worse course ever, waste of time. Should stop trying to teach engineers about english.

5.0
1.0
ENG182
Apr 10, 2004

Great prof, who cares about her students !!!

5.0
2.0
ENG182
Apr 14, 2004

great lady.

5.0
1.0
ENG182
Apr 14, 2004

No Comments

3.0
1.0
ENG182
Apr 16, 2004

I give her points for trying, but yeah...its hard to teach english.

1.0
1.0
ENG182
Jul 23, 2004

Good god. Worst Prof ever. Horrible course to boot. She cannot properly form a correct sentence without two minutes of prior thought. She teaches a communications course but desparately needs one herself. Horrible!

5.0
2.0
ENG2B01
Sep 14, 2004

I think this teacher is one of the best english teachers that I've ever met. She is very caring once you get to know her. She is always willing to bargain deadlines and she wants her students to do well. Being in her class made me like writing.

5.0
2.0
ENG182
Oct 10, 2004

No idea why everyone gives her such a hard time.

4.0
2.0
ENG100
Oct 21, 2004

She likes to spend 15-20 mins each class chichating with students, and tends to lose track of the time very easily. She writes disorganized notes too. However, she is really a caring prof and quite a lenient marker. Trust me, you'll love her...especially her lovely face and voice. She is soo hot.

2.0
3.0
ENG182
Oct 29, 2004

No Comments

4.0
4.0
ENG100
Nov 3, 2004

Tough prof, but then again I'm a science student and I don't have to write much.

1.0
3.0
ENG182
Nov 14, 2004

No Comments

1.0
4.0
ENG182
Jan 7, 2005

No Comments

1.0
3.0
ENG182
Jan 24, 2005

Prof. Flynn, would you please give up teaching this course?!I barely recall her finishing a sentence-at least one that makes sense- during her lectures, need I say more?

1.0
5.0
ENG182
Feb 3, 2005

English PhD, I don't think so. Learn to speak. Teachers like Kang, God forbid, can speak and teach better than she can. Can't form proper sentences, but at the same time, teaching us how to communicate. Let's just say there's a lot of "noise" between her and the audience. A big disappointment.

1.0
1.0
ENG182
Mar 5, 2005

No Comments

2.0
2.0
ENG182
Mar 18, 2005

I agree with previous posts that she definely has to take ENG182: she talks like a robot which cannot make up a complete sentence. The whole English course is a stupid course because nothing there makes sense, just a formalism.

4.0
2.0
ENG182
Apr 26, 2005

The course is a waste of time. The teacher is not bad though. You yourself try to explain something like the stuff she teaches. The good news is that ENG182 isn't mandatory anymore. Me feels good knowing that the next generation of engineers won't feel sorry for the wasted time as me does.

4.0
3.0
ENG100IN2004
Jul 20, 2005

Unlike other ENG100 classes that are a seminar format, my class was lecture+tutorial format. Prof Flynn honestly wants students to do well & will spend a lot of time helping students. Unfortunately, she also spends way too much time answering questions, so she easily losses track of time. Assigned readings are unnecessary if you listen in class.

3.0
4.0
ENG182
Aug 16, 2005

English teaching is ok, but deep-down she despises engineers. Sometimes starts talking complete nonsense ("Very little people here today. You must have a CALCULUS exam or something"). Irritating.

4.0
2.0
ENG1822003
Aug 22, 2005

Just from reading some of the comments on this site, it's completely evident why ENG182 should've stayed mandatory. She can't speak in complete sentences? Most people here can't even write full sentences in a comprehensible manner. While Prof. Flynn may not have been the best lecturer, she at least showed an effort to help us.

5.0
3.0
ENG100
Jan 26, 2006

she is a fair teacher and did everything she said she would (making sure we'd get the highest mark possible)

5.0
2.0
ENG100
Aug 10, 2006

I had a fairly good impression of this professor. She is very helpful if you speak to her one-on-one after class -- those talks can seriously raise the marks of your essays! Classes are admittedly pretty boring, but I still thought that this was a good university introductory course.

5.0
3.0
ENG100
Apr 13, 2008

I highly recommend Prof.Flynns course to any undergrad. It teaches you to write! Prof is extremely helpful and even gets to know students of a first name basis. Even if you're not an English major (I'm going into nursing) this course is a must!

5.0
4.0
ENG100
Jun 17, 2008

great prof, one of the best I had during my time at uoft

4.0
4.0
ENG100H
Dec 6, 2008

Decent teacher and she cared about helping us. This was her first time teaching as a class of 200 almost, may explain some lack of feedback. Overall a nice woman, talks in short fragments, but its because she seems to be composing her thoughts. The class was alot of work, and the book was absolutely useless. She was cool though.

5.0
1.0
ENG328
Jul 15, 2009

I loved professor Flynn. She was so nice, helpful and very approachable. Her lectures are very interesting and her organization is unparalleled. Her tests and essays are very fair. One of my favourite profs at U of T by far.

5.0
4.0
ENG328
Jul 24, 2009

Great professor. Engaging, enthusiastic, and a quirky sense of humor. She's very approachable and encouraging. Lectures are bit dry sometimes, but not always her fault. Take her in your undergrad, you won't regret it.

5.0
4.0
ENG214
Jan 12, 2010

When it comes to teaching Modern Literature, she is perfect. One of my favorite profs. from U. of T., and one of the most helpful courses in understanding how to read, analyze and approach literature. An incredibly efficient, fair and capable teacher.

5.0
2.0
ENG213
Mar 27, 2010

Prof. Flynn is such an amazing lecturer. She's engaging, knows her subject so well, and really wants her students to learn, understand, and become interested in the material. I took ENG214 with her in first term and liked it enough to also take ENG213 in second term. I'd definitely recommend her. The marking's not hard either!

3.0
3.0
ENG100
Nov 4, 2010

She's boring and talks in short fragments. It's hard to follow and going to class is a chore. ENG 100 is the bane of my life. *kill me now* OH and I'm in class right now.

5.0
2.0
ENG213
Nov 14, 2010

Solid reading list. Gives interesting modernist interpretations. Easy to get a high grade. Genuinely nice individual as well.

3.0
2.0
ENG100
May 12, 2011

Not the best english prof I have had. Attendance is MANDATORY because she will be handing out in class assignments. She doesn't really teach anything new about writing. It was more of a current events class. Essays are somewhat challenging. You need to do research, drafts, etc. Lectures are quite boring, played games on my iPod. Overall, easy class

2.0
2.0
ENG100
Nov 20, 2011

boring, going to class only for the in class work. Otherwise you learn nothing from this course. Also, the essays are absolutely irrelevant and boring. Don't take this class

4.0
2.0
ENG100
Nov 25, 2011

Good but not what I expected in the class. Sometimes very off topic and not the kind of writing I wanted.

5.0
3.0
ENG214
Apr 30, 2012

Brilliant slow readings of all the topics and works we covered. She's a hell of a professor with a huge capacity for caring about her students.

4.0
4.0
ENGA10
Jan 8, 2013

She sometimes goes off topic, but is very helpful and cares a lot about her students. She will take time outside of class to clarify anything. I found that the fill-in the blank-type questions on the exams were very difficult and unneeded.

5.0
3.0
ENG101H1S
Jan 24, 2014

Really thorough, helpful Prof. Lectures sometimes feel a little slow, but only because Prof. Flynn tries to ensure everyone understands the material, and is benefitting from the content. She really seems to care that students do well, and happily interacts/helps with anything.

5.0
1.0
ENG100H1
Apr 19, 2014

One of the best professors I have ever met.

4.0
1.0
ENG100
Nov 6, 2014

Although it is mandatory to attend in order to get in class papers, she is great with providing instructions for completing work outside of lectures. Also gives helpful feedback in order to improve. Lectures over all are long but still helpful and and interesting, plus shes got a great sense of humour.

4.0
3.0
ENGB70
Dec 16, 2014

Well spoken, interesting lectures. However easy her outline sheets make her tests appear to be, don't slack. Short answer sections can get very specific. Even if it says the q's will only focus on plot, get familiar with the films + discussion topics from lectures. The course can be enjoyable, but don't take it lightly.

1.0
4.0
ENGBO7H3
Grade: Rather not say
Dec 16, 2014

- Smart; does not know how to Teach - Instructions were never clear, clarification didnt help -Often asked TERTIARY high-mark value questions rewarding random specific syntax-memorization and not actual knowledge. Ridiculous questions. -Will tell you how many sentences to write in answer. E.g. a straight-forward question will require 4 sentences

5.0
2.0
PCL285
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 2, 2015

She genuinely cares about the students and ensures that instructions are clearly posted on blackboard. She was even nice enough to let us go early when we had a midterm for another course later that day. I would love to have another class with her

2.0
4.0
ENG100
Grade: B
Jan 28, 2016

Smart prof, great sense of humour but doesn't know how to teach or organize her lectures properly. You never really know what's going on with her lectures. Talks a lot about how to do it rather than what to do, instructions are never clear. Goes into detail about something and doesn't cover what that something is for. won't recommend

3.0
2.0
ENG100H
Grade: A-
Apr 20, 2016

She's really dmart and if you read instructions carefully, there's no need to attend class. BUT she is horrible at replying to emails. Missed the lecture before the essay was due for a legitimate reason and never replied.

5.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: A+
Aug 14, 2016
Would take again

I am a bit impartial, as I had a highly great experience with Professor Flynn. I went to practically every office hours she had, and she worked a great deal with me on my paper. She has an unbelievable ability to articulate the English language, and it was a pleasure to work with her. She also provided me with a great reference letter upon exit.

Inspirational
Clear grading criteria
Caring
4.0
4.0
ENGC44
Grade: B+
Dec 14, 2016
Would take again

She's nice and all but her lectures are a bit philosophical. For this course, I kinda felt lost most of the time because her lectures are a bit straying from the readings that we had to do. Lots of writing but she's a fair grader.

Gives good feedback
SO MANY PAPERS
EXTRA CREDIT
1.0
1.0
ENG100H1
Feb 7, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Disorganized in lecture, never had a clear focus for lectures, and often got sidetracked.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
2.0
3.0
ENGB70
Grade: A
Apr 13, 2017
Wouldn't take again

One thing I really disliked about her was that she was so unorganized and sometimes she would go off about random things that are not even relevant to the course. The material is however interesting though, and she does mark fairly.

SO MANY PAPERS
Hilarious
1.0
4.0
ENG100H1
Oct 2, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Very passionate about the course, but not at all organized in her lectures. Often begins talking about unrelated subjects, and assignments are unclear or weirdly worded. Must attend class to get graded for in class work.

Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: B
Nov 25, 2017
Wouldn't take again

No one can understand what she saying

Tough Grader
SO MANY PAPERS
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Dec 5, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Her analogies don't make the slightest bit of sense.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
2.0
1.0
ENG100
Grade: A+
Dec 21, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She comes to class disorganized. But, she's funny and caring. Instructions are unclear.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Tests? Not many
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
3.0
ENG100
Grade: A
Jan 8, 2018
Would take again

Deirdre Flynn greatly emphasizes the importance of critical writing and its applications to my other courses. Without her expectations and criterias, I wouldn't have succeeded efficiently throughout my university studies. Thanks for the preparation that this professor has helped me guide to build a stepping stone to my future writing career.

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
Would take again
2.0
3.0
ENGB75
Grade: A
Mar 30, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Subject matter expert--no argument. Teaching skills--poor. Lectures go off on tangents, instructions seem to be for other things half the time. Also, consistently late for class (she emails to tell us the start time and then arrives 15-20 minutes after her own time). Doesn't seem to encourage in-class participation.

Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
ENG100
Grade: A
Apr 24, 2018
Would take again

Dr Flynn tries to make this intro writing class interesting through the analogy of video games. Her lectures are relatively dry as they are reiterations of the course pack. However, it is easy to get marks so long as you put in the effort into all the graded in class activities and the assignment (2 essay). Final exam was very structured, no essay.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
4.0
4.0
ENG100
Grade: B+
Dec 6, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Prof. Flynn is very disorganized and makes concepts and assignments way more complicated than they need to be. I did not enjoy her class and she did not enjoy teaching it because of the big class size. That being said, for some reason I really liked her as a person and when talking one on one, was really helpful. I learned a lot despite everything.

Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
So many papers
2.0
1.0
ENGB75
Apr 15, 2020
Wouldn't take again

The class was good, the prof not so much. I don't usually like to say these things, but it is what it is. She's very disorganized, you ask a question and her response ends up confusing you and creating more questions rather than giving a straight answer; her guidelines are all over the place. But that being said, I did enjoy the movies she showed.

Beware of pop quizzes
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
5.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Nov 16, 2020
Would take again

Her course has changed the way I write. I'm deadass going to write a novel bc of this course.

5.0
4.0
ENG100
Nov 21, 2020
Would take again

Super nice prof! Weekly assignment, two/three papers, no final this term. TA will grade 40-50 papers per week, so get ready to write grade appeals. No need to attend lectures.

Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
Caring
2.0
3.0
ENG100
Grade: A
Dec 9, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Uninspiring. The course is structured in a way that does not make a lot of sense. The kind of things the course wants to teach, they are not actually very useful. If you want to take in for BR you could, its an easy A if you keep up with the lectures - they are dreadful. I would suggest taking up a seminar course instead to fulfill the BR honestly.

3.0
2.0
ENG100
Grade: A+
Jan 20, 2021
Would take again

Super nice. Very understanding and accommodating, especially during COVID times. Just follow her rubrics, skim through some of the lectures, and put in the work for the essays and you're good. Didn't learn much from her, honestly.

Clear grading criteria
Caring
2.0
3.0
ENG100
Grade: A
Mar 11, 2021
Wouldn't take again

She is really kind but the course was poorly organized at times. Overall, it was fairly easy and there was a lot of room to get free marks. Your mark may depend on your TA too sometimes. Readings were kind of hard to follow, but assignments has clear rubrics for the most part. Lots of small assignments here and there, but be prepared to write!

Clear grading criteria
Caring
So many papers
3.0
2.0
ENG100
Grade: A-
May 16, 2021
Would take again

Emailed her a few times with genuine concerns but never heard back from her. Otherwise, lectures were okay. She discussed exercise sets in class each week which helped. The course was decently disorganized, the assignments were barely ever explained properly. Everyone was always confused about what was expected of us and the feedback was vague.

5.0
3.0
ENG100H
Grade: A
Nov 15, 2021
Would take again

my fav prof so far. she's a bit disorganized, but I dont rlly think our marks suffer cuz of it (if anything, she gives us extra time/extra leniency when something goes wrong on her part). she doesn't care if you hand things in late, and the process writing assignments literally build up to our bigger essays, so everything we work on is helpful. <3

Lecture heavy
EXTRA CREDIT
2.0
4.0
ENG100H1
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 14, 2022

Lecture course are a lot to keep up with especially if your taking other courses it’s very chaotic and too much. I saw the reviews prior to taking this course and tried my best to keep up with the set work and lectures but fell behind. As there’s too much going on. a lot of the dates are incorrect on documents for deadlines just very confusing.

Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
ENG100
Grade: Audit/No Grade
Mar 22, 2022

Huge amounts of unnecessary and complicated explanations of exercises and steps in the writing process which you would expect an effective writing teacher to avoid. When students attempt to ask questions she would not provide adequate or related answers, often distracted during lectures by editing and changing course documents while presenting.

Get ready to read
4.0
2.0
ENG100H1
Grade: A
Nov 16, 2022
Would take again

Never understood why people complain so much about this course. Sure, prof is disorganized, but she offers lots of extra credit opportunities, literally does the homework with students after the lecture, and is super nice. All the assignments/ exercise sets built up on each other, easy marks, never took me more than 30 mins to do. Bird course tbh

EXTRA CREDIT
2.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Dec 12, 2022

Professor Flynn has a textbook that she reads, basically word-for-word, from. While the concepts aren't necessarily mind-blowing or hard to grasp, they do make the weekly (FOR MARKS) homework tedious as all hell. The writing of the textbook is also unnecessarily convoluted, with it overall feeling like a waste of time.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
2.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: A
Jan 9, 2023

The course material itself was interesting; however, the professor teaching the class was completely disorganized and messy. Nonetheless, I enjoyed the class because the material was interesting.

Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
Lots of homework
1.0
3.0
ENG100
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 1, 2023

Literally, assignment descriptions are vague and you have to through her disorganized files to find what an assignment is scrolling through hundreds of pages all to see what you even have to do. Feel bad for people who need this for their major.

1.0
4.0
ENG100
Grade: Audit/No Grade
Apr 4, 2023

It is a struggle to even find what you need to do for assignments as she uses her own convoluted notebook files INSTEAD OF POSTING IT ON THE ASSIGNMENT PAGE. She states stuff is worth completion but takes off marks if something isn't perfect. This class is people view English classes, using big fancy words and making writing English a chore.

4.0
2.0
ENG100S
Grade: Not sure yet
May 10, 2023
Would take again

Interesting course and I learned a lot from this prof. My TA gave detailed feedbacks. Office hours with TAs and Prof are both super helpful-- they basically help you structure! Sometimes going through the lectures, weekly sets, process writings, Quercus posts are a bit tedious, but I mean they are easy marks! Nice and informative prof overall!

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
2.0
3.0
ENG100
Sep 20, 2024

Course content is great. However, throughout the whole lecture it feels like you're being talked at; it feels unbareable and draining for 3 hours. The prof also speaks quite monotone, making it difficult to follow and remain attentive.

Lecture heavy
Accessible outside class
1.0
3.0
ENG100
Grade: Not sure yet
Sep 27, 2024

Everything is SO confusing. As a STEM student who chose to take this course to hone my writing skills; the entire course is all over the place. She only references her "textbook" which is a billion pages. Her lectures don't make any sense either and I find myself just rewatching the lectures instead (as they're recorded). Overall, terrible prof.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
ENG100
Grade: A+
Nov 16, 2024
Would take again

I liked her course.

Participation matters
Caring
Accessible outside class
3.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Jan 24, 2025
Would take again

disorganized: - change textbook right before lecture - textbook is confusing and all over the place. I like how she guides us thru it and does the exercises with us. - her schedule is confusing. An ex is the schedule says when she post the assignment but not when it's due. still not changed - left winged (good for me but not for some ppl lol)

1.0
4.0
ENG100H1
Grade: A-
Feb 3, 2025

The class was extremely disorganized, and professor Flynn really didn't do much actual teaching. It's all just process assignments that are copy-pasted from previous years, and are graded against unclear rubrics. The "textbook" is just a word file that is a large block of text that doesn't do much except try to explain the assignments. Don't take.

Get ready to read
1.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 7, 2025

The textbook is a Google doc, she is entirely disorganized, and it is tough to follow the lecture due to its long duration of 3 hours. Most of the time, she's not teaching anything, just reading random texts and giving her opinions. Assignments are not clear and rubrics are vague. In sum, DO NOT TAKE THIS COURSE.

Lots of homework
So many papers
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
ENG100H1
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 13, 2025

This course is a nightmare you can't escape from for 12 weeks, and based on how far back these comments go, it's clear she doesn't care. Only take ENG100 with Flynn if you absolutely have to - you'll thank yourself later. If you must, keep Advil on hand because you'll need it while trying to read through her confusing textbook and slides.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
1.0
2.0
ENG100
Grade: Incomplete
Mar 23, 2025

Professor keeps fixing her slides in the middle of the lecture (disorganized) Professor excessively repeats “do not use ChatGPT” (and I MEAN EXCESSIVE) Professors and TAs both avoid "complicated" emails involving justification for grades or rescheduling meetings.

1.0
3.0
ENGB75
Grade: A-
Apr 1, 2025

Seems preoccupied much of the time, and grading rubrics are inconsistent/unclear. She can be hard to get ahold of. She teaches from a self-published textbook and still does a bad job of adapting her teaching materials cause she reuses slides from previous classes and doesn't update them. Passionate about her subject, but not a great teacher.

Get ready to read
Hilarious
So many papers
2.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: A
Apr 7, 2025

The professor is alright, but the course and lectures were very dull and she had extremely narrow views on things. There wasn't any room for creativity in the essays at all. At the beginning of the course, she recommended us to print out her course book and take notes on it, so I did, and a lecture later she CHANGES THE BOOK?!? What a waste.

1.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 13, 2025

Very disorganized, hard to get ahold of. Lectures are sooo boring. TAs never respond to emails from the beginning of the semester. Had a final essay due, and never received the outline grades or feedback, but other students did? TAs were useless, and the professor also did not make any accommodations or extensions.

Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
ENG100H
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 16, 2025

This prof is on a power trip. She ignores my emails and my accessibility advisor's emails about extensions, telling me there are "too many students with needs to keep up?? She doesn't respond to emails, the grading is inconsistent, and students don't receive feedback if they use extensions. This is the most frustrating class I've ever taken.

1.0
3.0
ENG100
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 24, 2025

Just. Don't.

1.0
4.0
ENG100H1
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 28, 2025

- disorganized - didn't put instructions in "essay 1 assignment table" - narrow view of grading - horrible feedback as they are SO broad - teacher and TA not helpful I KNOW ENGLISH IS A BIRDY COURSE BUT IF YOU TAKE IT WITH HER, RUN! I MEAN IT! DON'T TAKE IT!

Tough grader
1.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: A
Apr 30, 2025

Excessive "don't use chatgpt" statements. TA basically useless except Katherine (head TA). Prof avoids emails. Never went to lectures but managed to get an A. Watched a recording when I was finishing the ES assignments. take it if u want free grades but prof pmo so much.

1.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: Incomplete
Oct 14, 2025

1. course load heavy 2. The professor is disorganized and has a narrow view on a lot of stuff 3. She swore next year's midterms and finals are offline 4. Lectures are boring and monotone 5. The topic stays the same for the rest of the semester, never changes 6. TAs aren't helpful either Not worth it for an elective, take other classes

Tough grader
Lots of homework
1.0
3.0
ENG100
Grade: Incomplete
Oct 16, 2025

just no, straight up don't ever take a class with her

Lots of homework
So many papers
2.0
3.0
ENG100H1
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 22, 2025

I appreciate what she's trying to teach us (it's important/useful), but tangents and disorganization make class difficult to follow. Acknowledges her students are mostly STEM with crazy workloads... refuses any extensions. Instead of teaching how to use AI responsibly as a learning tool, she excessively forbids it and denies it any good to learning

Lots of homework
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

47%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 26 grades
Most common grades:
Not sure yet (12)
A (11)
A- (5)
Grade Distribution
A(15)B(2)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(7)
Based on 44 reported grades
Not sure yet: 12
A: 11
A-: 5
A+: 4
Common Tags
Lots of homework (10)
Lecture heavy (9)
Get ready to read (7)
Caring (5)
So many papers (5)
Clear grading criteria (4)
EXTRA CREDIT (4)
Gives good feedback (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.74 avg change
Nov
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Oct
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENG101

5.0

(1)

ENG2B01

5.0

(1)

ENG328

5.0

(2)

ENG214

5.0

(2)

ENG213

5.0

(2)
+17 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENGA10

4.0

ENGBO7H3

4.0

ENGC44

4.0

ENG214

3.5

ENG100H

3.3

Similar Professors