3.2
Quality2.6
Difficulty67%
Would Retake114
Reviews67%
Would Retake
114
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
14
4
41
3
42
2
6
1
11
What Students Say
“Hours and hours of unnecessary busy-work”
PHIL214 - 1.0 rating“I would avoid his class at all costs”
PHIL202 - 1.0 ratingClass Info
Attendance Mandatory
96%
Textbook Required
31%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
+0.08 avg changeRatings by Course
PHLL1
5.0
(1)PHIL105
4.0
(1)PHIL350R
4.0
(1)PHILFILM
4.0
(1)PHIL205
3.7
(7)Difficulty by Course
PHIL150
4.0
PHILFILM
4.0
PHIL405
3.8
PHIL200
3.0
PHIL105
3.0
Reviews (114)
This class is very ambiguous. The TA ended up doing most of the teaching, and he was poor at it. The actual professor is a decent guy, but does not spend any extra time with students and leaves everything up to the TA. He doesn't explain things either. He's off in his own little world.
Despite the previous review--I thought that this class was interesting and informative. The class was initially written as an internet class--hence, all we need is clearly written on Blackboard. Meanwhile, for those that seek out the professor they will find that he is willing and ready to help.
Most of the time we didn't even seem to have a professor. The TA did everything. He pretty much just showed up whenever and left several times when his cell phone rang. Man, I wish I had a job like that.
Do NOT take metalogic from Packard! Wait for Foster or Carter to teach it. Packard does his own thing and it's absurd. It's like you learn logic, work your way up, just for him to do something completely different. What's worse is that you won't learn a thing, you'll fake it all semester, which requires a lot of work. You will get an A though.
Guess what guys - Nothing has changed in 25 years since I sat through a semester. Mildly entertaining opportunity to observe brain gymnastics, but I got nothing out of the class. Nice guy, but class not worth the seat time. (Where was this web site when I was taking programming from Burton. Oh, yeah. Gore hadn't invented internet yet.)
Enrolling in this class is submitting yourself to the whims of the arbitrary and irrational. His grading procedure is ridiculous, the TA does all the teaching, his auto-authored text book is a disgrace to the University, and every writing assignment is ludicrous. It's an easy A, but be prepared to pay with your sanity.
easy A, but the man has NO IDEA what he's talking about.
His creative writing/film class was wonderful. He was so helpful, not to mention brilliant. Wants students to succeed, energetic, thinks outside the box. One of the best professors I had all through college.
I honestly don't know how this guy became a professor. He's completely abnormal, and at the end of the semester I concluded that he actually knew nothing about the subject matter. I learned absolutely nothing in this course. He gave me a B-, which is the lowest grade I've received in my three years at BYU. That should tell you something.
If you want to go to class and get fed history of philosophy dont choose Dennis. His class evolves during the semester. You have to be ready to roll with the punches. If you do you will learn a lot though it may be eclectic. He is a great mentor and is awesome for one on one conversations. Anything that he has to do with film is golden.
Bro. Packard gets a bad rap, but I loved both classes I took from him. He gave A's for showing up for every class. Contrary to other comments, I found his insight on process philosophy and the philosophy of film to be exceptional. He also pushes for your projects to leave the class room and wants to help you get published. I thought he was a stud.
An easy class to pass, but the man is so unpredictable. His assignments are never clear, and he changes his mind on an hourly basis. He just expects you to understand things without taking the time to fully explain them. His assignments have no relevance to the subject matter, and I only had 2 class days where I felt like I learned anything useful.
I took Great Works: Film from Packard. He's a nice man, but his class was completely disorganized, he and the TA did no grading and gave no feedback until the last week of class (when they wanted us to redo everything they hadn't paid attention to throughout the semester), he's disorganized, and he used us to promote his pet program. good luck.
The other comments were right: Packard is the most disorganized professor I have ever had. Because the class changes as the semester goes along, you never know what you're going to have to turn in. This is why he is harder than he should be. He also teaches false doctrine. I would never take another class from Packard. Nice guy; bad professor.
Professor Packard is a great teacher. He has a tremendous wealth of knowledge that he truly wants to share. This is a professor that I would like to take more classes from.
Professor Packard cares about his students and wants them to learn and succeed. I had an A before I took the final. Do the work, go to class and you will get an A.
What a good teacher. He dedicated hundreds of hours to helping this class pull off a 13 minute film that was professional and well done. I learned more with his hands on style of teaching than I could have learned in a dozen textbooks. This class was time consuming during filming, but worth the effort.
This was a class on predicate logic. There was no textbook, no TA, and no resources to improve performance/ succeed. I'm extremely interested in logic, but Professor Packard doesn't explain difficult concepts in a way that is accessible. He's obviously very intelligent, but is terrible as a teacher.
Miserable class. Packard is unorganized and unclear, and he insists that your work pleases his particular taste. Hours and hours of unnecessary busy-work. You learn nothing about philosophy or about art--you just learn how to make "video essays." If you want to make movies, take a film class. This class shouldn't exist.
Professor Packard was the worst teacher I've had in all 3 years at BYU. His class was very disorganized and I didn't know what he wanted for his strange assignments. His discussions were all over the place and half the time I had no clue what he was even talking about. There was a lot of unnecessary busy work. I would avoid his class at all costs.
If you want to study and learn material, take a course from Dr. Packard. If you want to be fed information and just sit through a course, take a course from any other teacher. Dr. Packard is brilliant, yet sometimes unconventional. He is interested in seeing you learn and create new knowledge rather than repeat back to him what he has said.
The class is called Intro to the Philosophy of Art, but it's about film criticism and aesthetics. Brother Packard is a great teacher and really wants his students to understand the importance of film and its relationship with philosophy. There are no tests but instead an end of semester project on a film you choose that you analyze over the year.
This was by far the worst class I've ever taken at BYU. I even went into the class thinking that I would love it. We had to write a paper before every class period. He had to overhaul the entire way the class was run because nobody understood what he wanted. Super unclear. Pointless lectures. You're on your own with this guy. No tests, huge essay.
The class is divided into groups that you choose so hopefully you don't screw yourself over. I feel like I come to class more prepared than prof Packard. He does a better job explaining things two classes after originally teaching it. Beware! Take it from Carter. I'm tired of trying to figure out what he wants us to do for assignments, proofs, etc
Mostly focused on film criticism. Very interesting, helped me see films in a different way and appreciate the artistic process more fully. The main assignment is a paper about one film you watch over and over again, so pick a good one. Expectations and assignments are sometimes unclear.
Professor Packard is a great professor! He is very knowledgeable and has a lot of passion for philosophy and helping others learn. Sometimes he doesn't clearly state his expectations for assignments, but he will explain more and help you if you go talk with him.
Dr. Packard is fantastic. The class is taught flipped, so you can participate a lot. He is very respectful of your input and your ideas. Sometimes his teaching isn't super clear at first, but when you work through enough examples you will do fine. If you do all the work, you will get an A. Definitely recommend this class!
Professor Packard is fascinating. His discussions, though sometimes out of my comprehension, always directed my thoughts in new directions. The class consists of showing up, watching movies, reading tough philosophy, writing brief paragraphs on Learning Suite, and writing a couple of papers. Take this class if you want a professor that listens.
This class would be more accurately titled "Intro to Phil of Art applied to Film"
Dennis Packard is a great professor. He has an open discussion with his students in Intro to Philosophy of Art, and we enjoy talking about philosophers' theories, reading passages, films, and our analysis. He gives everyone a chance to speak, even if for a limited time, and tries to reiterate our points of view to make sure he's understanding us.
He is a great professor and knows his field of philosophy. His classes are great and filled with discussion. There is a lot of reading though for this course and a lot of writing, but it helps you learn how to read and process hard material. He really works hard to know you and to help you have a good time and to learn a lot.
Dr. Packard's expectations can be a little unclear and confusing at times (he became easier to understand by the end), but if you put effort into the class, he is willing to help and does a good job of clarifying specific questions. The discussions were based mostly on participation, so be prepared with thoughts and ideas to contribute.
The class ends up being very simple. Just watch the movies, do the reading, post online before class, and show up. The only real grades are the final exam and the final paper, which we peer reviewed a million times before they were due. But I was really confused for a long time about the way the class was supposed to run.
You need to make sure to come to class, otherwise you will get lost very quickly. He has a different teaching style than what you are probably used to, the entire class is geared towards writing the final paper. He is sometimes very unclear about what he wants and you have to either seek help from the TA or just do your own thing.
Prof. Packard is very likeable! He loves the subject even if he isn't the most accessible to student meetings or responsive to student emails. All that sort of thing goes through the TA, and it's awesome if you get a great one (I definitely lucked out)! It isn't too difficult to receive an A if you attend class and keep up with the homework.
This class was surprisingly interesting; be aware that you will dig deep into philosophy. You apply all of the philosophy to a film you get to choose. I enjoyed the class discussions, because Dr. Packard makes sure to make the lectures relevant. My only complaint was that sometimes it was hard to understand what was expected for assignments.
This class has been fantastic. I learned a lot about logic and mental processes, and had a good time doing it!
Don't worry too much about the work load. This is a nice class for expanding your horizons.
great professor! i really enjoyed the class and felt like i left the class having learned a lot.
The class is really good. Most of the points come from doing the readings and participating in class. Dr. Packard is really good at explaining difficult concepts.
He has a really interesting teaching style and class structure. He can be unclear in his expectations sometimes.
I like Dr. Packard a lot. His style can be confusing because he takes the course really fast, but he's a good teacher and knows the subject really well. Work with the TA.
I was not really excited about this class, but Prof Packard made the class understandable and in parts fun. There was quite a bit of reading, but it's philosophy. I'm glad I was able to take it from Prof Packard and would recommend taking it from him.
Nicest Professor! Really cares about the students and wants them to develop a love for philosophy. Don't get behind on the reading and you will do great!
This class was very interesting. Professor Packard leads great class discussions. He genuinely cares about helping you understand and connect difficult philosophers. You can tell he loves the subject. As long as you attend class and do your digital dialogues you will do fine.
I come from a CS background and the material was really easy in comparison. My advice would be to not be afraid to speak up and ask questions if lost. There's about 10 question homework due each class period and each question takes less than 5 min.
GO TO CLASS!!! He's a good teacher and it's an interesting class, just make sure to comment a lot.
Dr. Packard tries really hard to be more clear with homework directions and grading criteria, even though he's not always successful. Class is based on discussion mostly. If you don't do the pre-assigned reading, you have NO idea what's going on. Sweet guy though. Class was mostly based on attendance and one big paper at the end of the semester.
Dr. Packard is a genuinely kind person, and very passionate about what he teaches. His class is not kind to those who seek to do the least amount of work possible, as it is never communicated what is graded and what is not -- until the day it is due, that is. Show up, do the reading, do the umpteenth revision of an essay draft, and you'll be fine.
I took Philosophy 214 from Dr. Packard and it was a funny class. You only get graded on a few things, so attendance and participation are a big part of your final grade. The class is all about getting you to analyze difficult text, and I believe he helps with that. Be prepared to revise papers numerous times!
Lots of reading and watching movies for homework, but nothing that is difficult.
This class is all about just showing up and doing the digital dialogues. Some of the assignments were confusing, but if you ask for clarification, he'll help you out (and may change the instructions so that it makes sense to everyone).
Dr. Packard's lectures are always interesting. I always enjoyed going to class. However, the course was not particularly organized and it was sometimes hard to tell what the expectations were for papers, exams, etc.
I really enjoyed the class. Good insight into philosophy, helped me to be able to read and interpret difficult texts and to think more clearly in general. Dr. Packard is really nice and very helpful. He is also very fair. I would recommend taking the class.
Nice guy, very enthusiastic about his subject. Willing to give lots of feedback if asked. Really depends on his TA for day to day grading and assignment clarification, so make sure to make friends with the TA!
He's a great professor and the class was very interesting, but you must do the readings and attend in order to get an letter grade higher than a D, at least. It's about 65% attendance based.
The class was fine enough, don't get me wrong. Dr. Packard is a good lecturer and gets involvement from the class, but the class is awful because of the way the group project gets handled. There were many people forced into roles they were either not good at or didn't have motivation to fulfill, and making a short film is not something to do alone.
He is wonderful and I highly suggest taking classes from him. His classes are great if you are comfortable kinda going your own way and you enjoy discussion. The atmosphere he has in class is the best and you will learn a lot. The workload, while it is large, is fulfilling.
I loved this course. Dr. Packard knows his stuff, but better yet, knows how to get the students to understand it as well. This is a course that is academically and intellectually rigorous, but not impossible. He lets you control your learning and coursework, but guides very, very well. He's a great, comprehensible philosophy professor. 2 thumbs up!
Dr. Packard is very intelligent and knows how to lead a discussion well. The class was worth taking because I learned so much. However, his group project for the class (making a short film) was a little strenuous, especially if you were the writer/director.
The subject matter in this class is really complicated, but Dr. Packard formatted the class in a way that we were able to not only learn the material, but also retain and understand it better because over the course of the semester we used various handouts to write (essentially) a textbook covering the material for the entire course.
This is my second class from Dr. Packard, and I learned a lot from this one as well as the first. There are some things you need to know. Although it's called philosophy of art, it is almost entirely focused on film (Dr. P's passion). As a professor he is great and very willing to help, although instructions are often unclear. Easy A if not lazy.
This class was basically a research and writing course for developing resources for metalogic teachers. The work was more akin to graduate work, but the workload was fair and the professor cared a lot about his students and their success. I'm sure that he would be a great professor in a more traditional classroom as well.
This class focuses on film. This class constantly has homework. A big group movie making project was both the highlight and hardship of this class. A time consuming but fulfilling and fun class. Packard likes to tell stories and relate the philosophers to church doctrine. Sometimes lectures seem irrelevant to what we're learning, but that's okay.
This class was a research and writing course. Professor Packard was kind enough to give us other writings to work from. However, the writings given were mostly what helped me understand. I recommend this class for someone who is dedicated to learning the material.
Doctor Packard is a very sincere and genuine professor. If you take his class for a GE you might be bored out of your mind. Class can be really slow and he expects participation which can be frustrating when the lecture is so dry. 65% of his class is attendance based so attendance is a must and they don't allow you to miss class for any reason.
This is the second class I've taken from Dr. Packard. I wasn't as much a fan of this one as I was of PHIL 423 which he team-taught with Dr. Grandy. He's extremely smart, makes some good points in class, but the readings were a real grind and too lengthy for this type of class. I couldn't get very much out of them because I was focused on finishing.
Reasonable guy and will adapt teaching as needed. He's open to suggestions. HW--read about philosophers from the textbook and read a piece of writing from each philosopher and give a summary. Class--discussion on the reading. Textbook-free, easy to understand. Writings--difficult to understand. Be on time and do the summaries, and it's an easy A.
Dr. Packard is a good professor, but his class just didn't feel very organized, that being said it was very interesting material.
Teacher really good at explaining philosophers. TA super helpful in explaining things and directing us. Liked how the teacher linked concepts to the gospel. Course organization could have been improved some (eg expectations for midterms/final). He talked about politics a little more than I thought was good but wasn't a problem. Overall excellent!!!
Dr. Packard is brilliant, passionate, and very kind. But he struggles a LOT with organization, and you may be confused or frustrated for a lot of the semester. I have taken multiple classes from him and love him, but you really get out of it what you put into it and you have to be okay with going with the flow. Easy grader too.
Dr. Packard's classes tend to be less organized, but this is due to his novel teaching style. He wants students to take initiative in their education. For this class, you will only write one paper during the entire semester. That being said, this paper will be heavily critiqued. However, the workload is very manageable.
I like Dr. P. He's always willing to listen to ideas about how to improve. I didn't like a couple things about the class, though. First, grading. You get 1 pt/day only if you come to class and do the homework. It's not motivating to work hard on a long assignment because it weighs as much as a 1 paragraph response. Also, I wish Dr. P graded himself
This was philosophy of film. The class was graded almost entirely on notes you take on the readings and have to turn in but he grades them on completion. The main problem is that he asks two students to present their notes each time so he never even lectures at all. You still have to show up though because you have to turn in notes for class too
His class was dull, unorganized, and filled with busy work. He is not clear in his examples and struggles to understand his students. The text he uses is his own simplistic creation. Class time is used to do homework rather than to learn. It's easy enough to pass, but don't expect to improve your writing to improve. I'd take it from someone else.
This is a weird class. I would take it again in order to fill my general credit, but only because of that. It wasn't especially hard(pretty easy). It was a lot of reading and you write two papers at the end of the semester but they honestly aren't that hard. I found some aspects of the material to be cool but it was boring a lot of the time.
Dr. Packard is a great teacher. Like most people have said his class can be disorganized but he actively tries to improve it. The organization got better as the semester went on. He listens to student feedback and is available for help. I found the course to be enjoyable .
The class is super easy, but there are a lot of readings for credit, about 1.5 hours before each class. No tests, just a big paper and final paper at end. His class is horribly organized, and I spent more time trying to find what he wanted on his papers than actually writing the papers. Dr. Graham taught better, though this class doesn't have tests
Didn't seem to have a clear understanding of what he was looking for from students. Assigned 3 papers in total; 1 midterm, 1 final paper, and 1 in class paper. The midterm paper requirements were vague and left the whole class in confusion. His reading assignments took way longer than he estimated them to take. Loved to stand up and lecture.
Decent class, I think it could have been structured better.
This class was SO helpful. I really feel like my writing improved because of this class. He was very reasonable in adjusting assignments, and the ones we had were really helpful. It wasn't hard to get a good grade. Awesome class!
Pros: really interactive class. Students have ample opportunities to ask questions and give comments. The professor is always very helpful. A great learning experience if you are truly interested in the subject. Cons: the instructions on the final exam and final paper were a bit vague. Some examples online would have made a huge difference.
Professor Packard is wonderful person, who offers very insightful feedback. He is truly interested in your projects. The class was interesting but seemed very impractical at times. I struggled to see valid application of the theories being discussed.
Dr. Packard is very kind and eager to help students, especially in matters of faith. He's also very passionate. His classes can be a bit disorganized and sometimes difficult to follow, but he always clarifies if you ask.
Dr. Packard is a nice guy. He's easy to talk to and responds well to emails, etc. He knows his stuff and means well.
The class had a lot of potential but I could never really tell if it was meant to be a philosophy course covering film or a film course covering philosophy. The two didn't always mesh well and I often wondered how the topics we discussed were relevant.
This class was okay. Dr. Packard isn't the most organized guy. Luckily, the text book is free, and attendance is like 60% of your grade.
I took his Philosophy of Film class. Very interesting subject. I would recommend this class to anyone that enjoys film or has any interesting in learning more about film. Overall a fairly easy class, but you MUST attend class, ass the majority of your grade is based off of a quick daily write up of what you learned and questions about the topic.
Although Professor Packard's classes are extremely unorganized, if you do what he says and show up to class, you will get a good grade and probably enjoy the lectures.
Pros: extremely passionate about philosophy, art, and religion and uniquely intertwines all three in his lectures/ brilliant mind/ sees great worth in students and often guides discussion based on their individual interests/ fairly easy grader Cons: poor organization/ classes lack variety/ few interesting learning opportunities
Professor Packard is a philosopher and sounds like a philosopher, complete with all of the hard to understand qualities the philosophers seem to suffer from. You can tell that he is thinking of very deep subjects, but his communication of those things is often hard for mere mortals to understand. I is often hard to understand what exactly he wants.
He is a good choice
Attendance and reading accounted for 60% of the grade. Some philosophical readings were hard to get through but he explained each philosophers well in the lectures to prepare the students for the final paper and the exam. It's hard to not get an A if you come to class and do the assignments on time.
Dr. Packard emphasized applying what we learn to real-world problems and that was fun. Also, he taught us the basics of logic which I really enjoyed and was helpful for critical thinking. The class, however, was very disorganized. They didn't tell us how our pre-class writing would translate to our final paper and the rubric was very unclear.
Lots of reading and discussions. His outlines can be a tad confusing.
Enjoyed the class! Sometimes Professor Packard isn't very clear on assignment expectations, but other than that it was great!
Good professor. Instructions were not every clear, but it was not that bad.
This class is fine but a lot of the essay assignments were very unclear as to what we were supposed to write and the entire grade was 3 essays and attendance. pretty easy class but rather boring and confusing at times.
I thought I would hate this class and was only taking it to fulfill two GE credits- But it turned out to be my FAVORITE class! Sometimes I got lost in his lectures, but I really enjoyed his thoughts most of the time. The class is pretty easy. Come to class everyday, do the readings and you'll do great.
The textbook was an online google doc he had created with his students. We traded off between reading from it to reading excerpts from different philosophers. I've never taken a philosophy class and only signed up for this one because it fulfills two GE credits. At first I was sure I'd hate it. But I was surprised when it became my favorite class!
Professor Packard is clearly knowledgeable about philosophy and is really helpful when you talk to him outside of class. That being said, the class organization is the worst I've seen. Assignments aren't always effective at teaching and class time is often wasted. If Packard could organize his teaching style, I would give him 4/5.
I also took Packard's PHIL110 class; this one was much better. Great lectures. Lots of reading and writing, but not very much homework until the end of semester group film projects and final papers. Sometimes, lectures (more like discussions) are awesome. Talk to him outside of class too, he is great.
Dr. Packard's focus is primarily upon making you a better writer, so you spend a LOT of time in class going over other's papers, and most of the learning is done by readings at home, but it's not too extensive. I enjoyed the class, but only because I tried my best to participate. It would be really boring if you didn't want to learn anything.
This guy is way chill and easy to do what he asks. Not complicated.
Professor Packard is great during his lectures and often has very insightful comments. Classes are fun and often begin with music. The readings are daily, but they are online so it's easy to access them. Class discussions are always informative and help with the understanding of the overall material.
Dr. Packard is a good guy, and his class is designed to be thoughtful and not overly stressful. There is a lot of writing, but it's balanced by few to no tests and a hefty participation grade.
Prof. Packard gave ambiguous instructions and changed his instructions from what he had on the syllabus multiple times. He would say "I wanted your paper to have ___" in class the day we were to turn it in and then would lecture people in front of the whole class about their assignments. He had good intentions... We lucked out with a good T.A.
Packard's class is fine. He is passionate about film, so that's what you will focus on. The best thing to realize is that there isn't really any right or wrong answer to what he is teaching. Mostly just vague ideas about philosophers. It's definitely a philosophy class. Our TA was great, so hope you get a good one, as they will be doing everything
Professor Packard loves philosophy, and absolutely loves art. However, his teaching style is hard to follow. If you take this class, you'll learn a TON about art and how philosopher's view it. On the other hand, you'll be up to your neck in homework. The class is an easy A, and you'll learn so much. Just be prepared to earn it.
This class was great. Definitely not for everyone, but it's a pretty easy A if you do the work. You get out what you put in, so be ready to be actively engaged, or this class will bore you to tears.
Professor Packard is an intelligent man capable of offering insightful lectures on this topic. He obviously understands art in the philisophical stance well. Students who actively participate will find the class enlightening. On the other hand, the class is pretty unorganized. Many of the lectures are poorly run and result in wasted time.
Professor Packard is great, I learned a lot in this class. The only drawback is there's a lot of homework, but it's not difficult, just time consuming
Professor Packard gives great insight into the course material and philosophy in general. This is the second class I have taken from him and I loved it also. Typical to Dr. Packard the course isn't as organized as other courses normally are. His teaching style is unique and sometimes that can make understanding how the class works a bit difficult.
The class if philosophy of art, but it focuses on film in particular which I enjoyed. Professor Packard gives a lot of good insights and taking the class helped me gain a better appreciation of film and art in general. One criticism is that the class assignments can be vague or confusing. If you love philosophy or film the class is a must have.
Class Info
Attendance Mandatory
96%
Textbook Required
31%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Stable
+0.08 avg changeRatings by Course
PHLL1
5.0
(1)PHIL105
4.0
(1)PHIL350R
4.0
(1)PHILFILM
4.0
(1)PHIL205
3.7
(7)Difficulty by Course
PHIL150
4.0
PHILFILM
4.0
PHIL405
3.8
PHIL200
3.0
PHIL105
3.0