2.8

Diana Martin

Science - Rutgers - State University of New Jersey

2.8
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
142
Reviews
2.8
Quality
3.7
Difficulty
2.6
Helpful
2.9
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

142

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

26

4

28

3

32

2

25

1

31

What Students Say

She SUCKS and made me hate bio

BIO1012 - 1.0 rating

Don't slack off in lab

BIO101 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

53% confidence
Based on 1 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 1 reported grades
A+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.06 avg change
May
Dec
Jan
Apr
Aug
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

BIO2

5.0

(1)

BIO1AN2

5.0

(1)

BIO101AND102

4.0

(1)

BIO33

4.0

(1)

GBIO102

4.0

(1)
+19 more courses
Difficulty by Course

101119

5.0

GENERALBI

5.0

BIOLOGY101

5.0

BIO04

5.0

BIO10102

4.0

Reviews (142)
4.0
5.0
BIO101
Nov 12, 2001

ugh.... let's just say her exams are annoying as heck

4.0
5.0
BIO101102
Aug 9, 2002

Oh look the test...did she go over that in class?

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Nov 8, 2002

I hate this lady. She is annoying, demeaning, rediculous, monotone, and hideous.

3.0
5.0
BIO101
Nov 11, 2002

No Comments

5.0
3.0
BIO101
Nov 14, 2002

A very underrated lady who will take the time to fully answer any question. ++

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Dec 4, 2002

Exams are ridiculous....don't seem to come from the lecture or the book...

5.0
2.0
BIO10110
Feb 17, 2003

Easy class IF you actually pay attention and go... I got an A in 101

4.0
3.0
BIO101
Feb 20, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
BIO102
Mar 6, 2003

ah...these exams she makes up are insane...can we say curve, cuz apparently she can't....an exam based on lectures would be really helpful for this course...

5.0
4.0
BIO101
Mar 10, 2003

No Comments

2.0
4.0
BIO102
Mar 10, 2003

She never goes over anything that she puts on the freakin exams! Zzzzz

2.0
4.0
BIO102
Mar 14, 2003

She doesnt teach what is on her exams

2.0
4.0
BIO10102
Mar 14, 2003

Can't stand the woman's voice. Tests are on obscure info that you will only know if you have a COMPLETE understanding of bio (a PhD), but I guessed well and the curve helped. Thank god she does not lecture the entire semester. Notes also unorganized.

1.0
3.0
BIO
Mar 21, 2003

shes boring, her exams are a pain in the ass, and shes a **** to top it all off, im sorry if you get stuck taking this class

4.0
5.0
BIO101
Mar 31, 2003

Presents a well organized lecture. Very boring, and exams are very difficult

3.0
4.0
BIO10102
Apr 10, 2003

not the best lecturer. boring. always goes too slow or too fast. her exmas are fairly hard.

2.0
4.0
BIO101
Apr 14, 2003

She is the devil and the definition of monotone speakers. Dont expect to stay awake and dont expect to learn anything from her. She is the worst teahcer I have had in my life. I hope she reads this and retires. Simply awful! Never ever take her!

2.0
3.0
GENCHEM
May 9, 2003

snore

3.0
4.0
BIO10102
May 16, 2003

Tests r really hard despite hrs of studying. For some questions I hav no idea where she gets them from. When she lectures, gives seemingly Xtra info, so u ignore it, but then it prolly shows up on the exam. Organized to an extent. Transue was way better!

5.0
2.0
BIO101102
May 21, 2003

Martin kicks buttocks. Her explanations are clear and deliberate, outstanding lecturer and all around cool lady.

2.0
4.0
BIO101102
May 30, 2003

You might as well just go to sleep during class because it's so boring you won't remember a thing she said anyway...so glad it's over!

2.0
5.0
BIO10110
Jul 11, 2003

i'm a GOOD student..i go 2 lectures, take GOOD notes, read the matierial & these 2 classes r the ONLY classes that killed me @ rutgers..her exam convers the stuff she mentions for 1/10 of a second but not what she spent 1/2 a lecture on..go figure

2.0
5.0
GENBIO
Sep 1, 2003

Awful. Exams are unnecessarily hard. Many times exams test information that she presents in lecture as just what seems to be an afterthought. Dry lectures will bore you. Make sure your cell phone doesn't go off in class!!

3.0
4.0
BIO0102
Sep 10, 2003

There was stuff on the exams that made me questions if I was in the right class...

4.0
2.0
BIO101
Oct 26, 2003

i never went to lecture and on the day of the exam, i read thru all the chapters that were on the exam from the moment i got up til the exam that night. i got a B! trust me, everything on the test was straight from the book... lectures are pointless

3.0
4.0
BIO101
Oct 27, 2003

Boring lecturer, but interesting material

1.0
4.0
BIOLOGY
Nov 12, 2003

Dr. Martin, or should I say Dr. Satan is definitely the worst professor I have ever had. I would rather be stabbed with a thousand needles covered in HIV positive blood than listen to that lady speak. She truely encompasses evil. ps shes old and wrinkly

4.0
3.0
BIO101
Nov 13, 2003

very very very boring...but knows what she's talking about..notes are very clear and very good...but her review sessios aren't helpful at all. exams are a bit hard requires a lot of studying!!!

5.0
3.0
BIO101
Nov 14, 2003

She is sooo great! Sit in the front and ull never fall asleep. She is really interesting and kinda funny, you just have to go in there with a willingness to learn. Great notes and clear, but u have to understand that u HAVE to study if you take her. &l

5.0
2.0
BIO101
Nov 21, 2003

One prof who knows her stuff...the things in the book don't exactly complete her notes, so you have to take notes in class; notes are excellent and organized...very helpful if you have any questions or concerns

5.0
1.0
BIO
Nov 22, 2003

I admitted twice I cheated, but later said I didn't... and she didn't do anything ---I got sympathy since my family is ****ed up.

5.0
3.0
BIO101
Dec 14, 2003

She's a very nice lady and knows a great deal of biology. If you are interested in biology you will not find her lectures boring -- they are very thorough. If you're just taking the course to fulfill a requirement, though, you won't have too much fun.

5.0
4.0
BIO101
Dec 18, 2003

Dr. Martin receives an unfair bad rap from students who don't have the initiative to actually LEARN her material. Her exams are only difficult if you don't go to lecture or study, and you have to study for at least 10 serious hours on each hourly exam.

5.0
2.0
BIO2
Feb 2, 2004

Dr. Martin basically teaches from her lecture notes. If you go to class and actually pay attention, you can gain a great deal. Rocked a b+ in the class.

1.0
5.0
GENERALBI
Apr 6, 2004

VERY bad woman...thought she was hot...exams are super hard and tries to trick you

4.0
2.0
BIO1012
Apr 17, 2004

Eventhough she can be ****y and has an annoyign voice....pretty good professor spells everything out for you and writes down major points....don't read the book alone it will confuse you go to class and concentrate on what she says there

5.0
1.0
BIO102
Apr 18, 2004

Probably the best bio professor ever...notes are very clear and easy to understand...no reason why anybody shouldn't get A's on the exams since she practically recites her notes, and all you gotta do is write everything down since she goes very slowly

1.0
5.0
BIO101102
Apr 23, 2004

her tests are evil. she is evil. she doesn't know how to teach. the book is completely different than her notes...wtf...she should try to follow the book instead

2.0
5.0
BIO101102
Apr 29, 2004

Exams are so impossible that an A is 110/150. Can't teach a thing, and tries to trick you all the time on the exam, which don't test stupid concepts.

3.0
3.0
BIO102
May 16, 2004

A lil hard,but massive curves cuz her exams r impossible,too much of her material on the exam! She knows her stuff but this lady is whacked out.really needs 2 chill in lecture, spazz w/ cell fones,irrelevant info,lisp w/ accent,u want a good laff,go 4 it!

3.0
4.0
BIO101
Jun 7, 2004

first think she'll tell you is how she DID NOT make money off your textbooks, BS! of course, charity work and there's a new edition out already. Test aren't easy. Go to class, take notes, ask questions, read book, a lot of material, lab sucks, huge curve.

5.0
1.0
GENBIO
Sep 2, 2004

she is a really good professor.people complain about how hard the class is and how much material there is.but they are just too lazy to go to lecture.to get an A- go to lecture, pay attention, get notes down and at exam time know them WELL and ur good

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Sep 29, 2004

WORST TEACHER E-V-E-R....and don't think that because you have to buy her book that she's gets money for it...yeah-right...take bio with Davis if you can and avoid Martin at all costs

2.0
5.0
BIO101
Oct 14, 2004

her exams are based on the lectures. she doesnt write anything down and the questions are so damn detailed, you need to have a sixth sense to catch everything.

1.0
5.0
101119
Oct 17, 2004

horrible. specifically says, "dont read the book" and then makes her exams ridiculously detailed. her notes cant be bad because she doesnt write****.

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Oct 28, 2004

she f****** sucks. boring as hell. dont bother going 2 class or reading the notes, every1 fails , well except for the nerds lol.

4.0
4.0
BIO101102
Oct 28, 2004

she's not so bad. i hated her but then got dr French and learned to appreciate her. she's tough but this class in not meant to be elective and most of the students are premeds/rx so it's understandable. must read and go to lectures. huge curve especially on lab practical.

1.0
2.0
101102
Oct 29, 2004

BORING, take a different prof for bio 101 102, dont let her bore you.

5.0
4.0
BIO101
Nov 3, 2004

i like Dr.Martin, she genuinely wants to help everyone understand the material and as long as you skim her text book before class you can follow her in the lectures. her exams are hard but there is a huge curve, she's organized and straight forward.

4.0
3.0
BIO101102
Nov 18, 2004

Go to class and write down as much as she says as you can. She will say her point a few times so if you are paying attention its hard to miss it. Don't read the book. When exam time happens, read your notes, and if you have q's go to her office hours. She is extremely helpful there. I got A's.

3.0
3.0
101
Dec 3, 2004

informative teacher but very specific exams

4.0
4.0
BIO101
Dec 23, 2004

She isn't so nice and makes the exams very difficult. However if you attend her lectures and study the book on your own you should be okay.

4.0
2.0
BIO101
Jan 10, 2005

She's nice and sincere about wanting students to do well. Listen to her advice about study groups 'cause it reinforces/clarifies info esp when you teach others. Overhead figures are important!

4.0
3.0
101
Jan 18, 2005

study the notes

4.0
3.0
BIO101
Jan 20, 2005

she is very boring but her notes her very good..should always read the book b4 going to her class and take cup of coffee.

2.0
4.0
BIO101
Apr 8, 2005

doesnt try to help students by writing down notes or putting notes online like other bio profs. talks all period and writes down only a few words while pointing at diagrams from the text. you'd expect more from the textbook author. also, she thinks the MSLC is the answer to all problems. avoid her!

3.0
5.0
BIO101
Jul 9, 2005

No Comments

5.0
2.0
BIO101
Sep 2, 2005

I'm not sure why everyone hates on Dr. Martin so much.. she's a really nice lady who wants all of her students to do well. This class was a huge lecture hall (the biggest I've ever had) but if you sit in the front, it feels like there are 20 people tops, and she is not boring. She is also really helpful at her weekly review sessions at the MSLC.

4.0
3.0
BIO101
Sep 27, 2005

No Comments

3.0
3.0
BIO101
Oct 20, 2005

Her speaking is all right, but her notes are severely lacking. You are going to have to REALLY pay attention to catch everything. Most likely you will have to review the chapter by yourself afterwards to see what you missed

3.0
5.0
BIOLOGY101
Oct 27, 2005

ummmmm... White T-shirt?????? avoid her at all costs

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Nov 11, 2005

Shes a ****!

5.0
4.0
BIO101
Grade: A+
Nov 16, 2005

i like her. she is very clear, gives you an outline of wat she will explain in lecture. and she says 1st day of class that everything in lecture is fair game for exam. its that simple. just pay attention and take good notes! but u should go back and read what she explains in lecutre in the book.

2.0
4.0
BIO101
Nov 17, 2005

she is horrible.. justt plain horrible.. i meen her lecture sux, she puts 2 words up the whole lecture, talks in monotone, acts liek we're all stupid, and her tests are mad hard... u hafta readd the book 4 her cuz she is verry unclear of what to study for.. and her jokes are so corny, she thinks she's funny but she definetly isnt.. :(

3.0
4.0
BIO101
Nov 21, 2005

Do not go to first lecture! you will hear the name cathy agnese so many times you will wanna kill yourself. its pronounced frooctose and not FRUCKTOSE! and its telophase not freakin TEELOPHASE. AHHHHHHH

3.0
4.0
101102
Nov 26, 2005

study the notes

2.0
5.0
GENBIO
Dec 2, 2005

HER CLASS SUCKS, extremely BORING. Very hard to stay awake in class let alone take notes. Everyday at least 65% of the students were sleeping. Strongly recommend you take someone else if you have a short attention span cause you will fall asleep.

3.0
5.0
BIO101
Dec 7, 2005

AVOID AT ALL COSTS! Her exams are toooo specific, and lectures are pointless. You're better off taking biology with Keating.

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Dec 14, 2005

french made me like this class, but when she came back for the end, i rarely went.

1.0
3.0
BIO101
Dec 17, 2005

HORRIBLE TEACHER, Tests arent too bad though. Supposibly Keating is like a 100 times better. I cant stay awake in her class. French was pretty good but he was only around for plants. and lets face it, who cares for plants anyways.

5.0
3.0
BIO101
Dec 26, 2005

Very enthusiastic about her subject. Good professor, very helpful. Her lectures are kind of hard to follow sometimes, and she doesn't write down many notes. Other than that she is good. Just go to class and pay attention and you will be fine.

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Dec 30, 2005

martin the southern b**ch needs to be run over with a car...and thrown into a dumpster... she sucks in every possible way...her lectures are pointless, she talks so slowly and goes off topic every two seconds ...exams are a pain in the a$$...french is much better though.

5.0
3.0
BIO102
Jan 6, 2006

No Comments

4.0
3.0
BIO101
Jan 17, 2006

She's a very good teacher, she puts all of the information out there, but it is your responsibility to go to class and study. Everything she talks about is on the exam, so just go to class and you'll be fine.

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Jan 20, 2006

French was definitely better. Martin doesn't provide slides, DRAWS her own pictures.. its seriously pointless to go to her lectures because she LITERALLY reads off the book.

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Feb 5, 2006

Worst teacher ever. Take Brey... on Cook. She wrote the book so she assumes she goes over everything when she def doesn't and claims she did. She writes the exams to trick you, not test your knowledge and is the most boring lecturer ever. She's rude if you talk to her and is prob the only prof I've ever met who is worse in office hours.

3.0
3.0
BIOLOGY
Mar 3, 2006

lectures are good in my opinion. they can be boring but look at it as story time and take good notes. the tests, i have to admit suck! they do not test you knowledge like she claims. i recommend reading the book and doing the multiple choice at the end of the chapter or just getting a test from previous years

1.0
3.0
BIO101
Mar 3, 2006

She is just very cold, and does not respect differences that well.

2.0
4.0
BIO
Mar 5, 2006

wow this woman is so COCKY about the fact that she wrote the book. her lectures are boring as hell and arent engaging at all. she just rambles and cant even pronounce the biological terms correctly. her tests are unfair cuz they ask random questions that arent important. she doesnt even give useful info but talks bout random stuff like typewriters

2.0
4.0
BIO101102
Mar 6, 2006

Her lectures are horrible. Sure, she'll cover the material, but it takes her 10 minutes to say anything. Sometimes she dances around what she's trying to say and never actually says anything substantial. Her southern drawl is somniferous.

4.0
2.0
BIO101AND102
Apr 11, 2006

A lot of people don't like her, but I have to say that my notes for her lectures are by the BEST out of all of the bio teachers. Her tests come DIRECTLY from lectures. Don't bother reading the book because there is a lot in there that she skips. Just go to lecture, take notes, and study in a group and you shouldn't have a problem getting 120+

3.0
2.0
BIO101102
Apr 19, 2006

She's not as bad as people make her out to be. She's very nice... and though her voice is SO obnoxious... her notes are good. All you need to do is pay attention. Everything she says in lecture... if you draw on those topics, you'll be fine for the exam. If you do decent with her... you know you're good. She is the most thorough

5.0
2.0
101102
May 12, 2006

I really liked Dr. Martin. Her lectures were clear and to the point, and she has a lot of knowledge about biology. Her exams can be tricky, but if you study you will do fine. She is a really good professor and I recommend her.

2.0
5.0
BIO101
Nov 5, 2006

nice person but eeeehhh... so/so teacher.... it's very easy to fall asleep in the class, tests are HARD.

3.0
3.0
BIOD1
Nov 8, 2006

Martin knows her stuff she just can not teach it very well. Her voice puts me to sleep during lecture but she definitely gives good cover sheets in order to take notes from. The class is hard but bareable.

4.0
4.0
BIO101
Nov 13, 2006

The 4 Steps you need to get an A in Dr. Martin's Biology 1.) Attend all lectures 2.) Take GOOD notes 3.) Make flash cards 4.) Switch out of Dr. Martin's section as soon as possible!

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Nov 22, 2006

Exams were impossible, her lectures were horribly boring, and straight from the text book. She never followed a straight thought, instead jumps around a lot. Unfortunately you can't avoid her if you need Bio. She seems cocky, arrogant, and talks with a condescending tone ALL the time. Expect to study A LOT just to get C's.

3.0
3.0
BIO101
Nov 24, 2006

one can not rate the easiness of biology just on the effectiveness of the teacher. it is one of those subjects you have to be motivated to do. i studied my ass off for the 2nd exam 2 days before with my friend. and I was motivated, he wasn't. thus, I got an A while he got a C. her lectures are boring and the book sucks. as long as ur motivated.

2.0
5.0
BIO101
Jan 4, 2007

Class is pretty much designed for you to fail, if you don't study for the exams like a month in advance you'll do bad

1.0
5.0
BIO04
Jan 4, 2007

Do not take this class with this prof.. didnt teach anything in the class and when exam comes she scare students saying you all know this but what? never mentioned during lecture....

4.0
2.0
BIO101
Jan 8, 2007

She is all right. If you stay focused, you'll do fine. And make sure you take good notes since most of what she covers is on the exam

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Jan 9, 2007

She freakin sucked. Such a bad teacher and her tests are RIDICULOUS!!!! YOU seriously have got to study every DETAIL to at least pass...no joke. holy hell...don't take her please!

3.0
3.0
BIO101
Jan 12, 2007

honestly, i didn't go to lectures..maybe 5 at the most... but i read the book and she did write it so. read the book... flash cards do help with the exams... but read read read... i got aced all the exams but got a b+ because of the lab practical....TAKE THE LABS SERIOUSLY!!! it might screw you over, like it did to me

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Mar 3, 2007

she is the worst lecturer i ever had. her lectures are boring and i didn't learn anything. the only way to pass the class is to read all the chapters assigned, and do well in lab.

4.0
2.0
BIO102
Mar 18, 2007

everything on the test comes from the lecture, it's SO easy. she's boring but if you apply whatever she says to the questions... =)

4.0
4.0
BIO101
Jun 4, 2007

I don't understand what everyone's problem is with her. She is a really really NICE lady who will go out of her way to help you if you have questions. Her lecture may be a bit dry but she emphasizes the important points and really makes sure that you learn bio. Plus, if you go to her lecture you don't need to really read the text book. TAKE HER!

4.0
5.0
BIO101
Nov 11, 2007

she is a stickler...hard teacher comes off hard but is really nice one on one

4.0
3.0
BIO33
Nov 12, 2007

Lectures are very general you have to read the book tests have lots of detail and "more than one of the above" questions

5.0
1.0
BIO101
Dec 18, 2007

I SERIOUSLY DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THESE PEOPLE LEAVE ALL THESE NEGATIVE COMMENTS. Martin is a rele nice person. bio101 is a breeze if you actually go to her lectures and take notes (I went nuts with my notes). Ppl get bad grades b/c they don't study. it's as simple as that. u don't hafta read the book either.just study the quesnaire thing n u'll ace

3.0
3.0
BIO101
Dec 23, 2007

She's really lame and won't necessarily generate interest in it...but if you are a good student, take good notes you'll end up doing well. She taught me to understand rather than memorize. Take the lab seriously and use the online prelab, you'll thank yourself when it comes down to the practical. She's also hot as hell, man I want a piece of that.

3.0
3.0
BIO101
Dec 27, 2007

She's not a horrible professor. She's nice and willing to help, but once you ask her a question, she'll talk you to death for about ten minutes straight.But just go to class, even though the lectures are VERY boring. Her lecture outline is actually very helpful if you just answer ALL the questions and review them before an exam, you should be good.

2.0
4.0
BIO101
Jan 7, 2008

My advice for anyone taking this course: If you are not inherantly proficient in Biology, figure out the chapters that are covered on the exams, and READ! Read your life away. Read until you can't help but talk in Biological terms. Her lectures are painfully boring.

3.0
1.0
BIO101
Jan 24, 2008

Easiest class of my first semester. Some classes are book dependent and some are lecture dependent. If you want an A GO TO LECTURE. Her lectures may be boring but I got an A by going to lecture and writing everything down, didn't open my book once all semester. Every single question on the exams comes from every word she says in lecture.

3.0
3.0
BIO101
Jan 28, 2008

Martin isn't that bad of a teacher. The class isn't that bad either; RIDICULOUSLY boring (both of them), but not that bad. Make sure to GO TO LECTURE, because there will be random questions thrown in on the test about side remarks she made in lecture. Besides, going to lecture eliminates having to read the book since...she WROTE it! lol

3.0
4.0
BIO102
Mar 29, 2008

DONT LISTEN 2 ANYONE BELOW WHO SAYS JUST GO TO LECTURE AND DONT READ THE BOOK. THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WIT THAT IF U WANT TO WASTE TIME NOT UNDERSTANDING ANYTHING OR UNDERSTANDING IT AND FORGETTING IT. aDVICE--> READ THE BOOK. IT WILL GET U AN A, BUT DONT MEMORIZE, UNDERSTAND IT.I ALMOST FAILED 101,CUZ I WROTE NOTES ND WENT TO CLASS, THIS SEM.I READ

4.0
4.0
BIO101
Apr 14, 2008

She isn't as bad as everyone puts her out to be. Bio is not easy and she won't make it any easier. I got an A. I attended lecture and read the book day and night! Good luck.

1.0
5.0
BIO102
Apr 23, 2008

Martin only taught one lecture in 102 and it was the lecture I was the most confused about. This woman is very intelligent and I respect her for that. However, because she is so intelligent she thinks what she's teaching up is really easy when it's really not. She is no clearer in person than the book she wrote on the subject matter.

3.0
4.0
BIO101
May 8, 2008

Not a very good professor. She is extremely intelligent but her lectures sucks. You would do just as well reading the book by yourself. She doesn't hold a candle to Keating. Keating is the best bio teacher, much easier to understand and I learned so much more with Keating than I ever did with Martin.

3.0
3.0
BIO102
Jun 3, 2008

She's real boring, but then again she's teaching biology. I managed a B in the class without paying attention that much in class but just reading the book on my own (didn't read that much and I'm not a bio buff either). So if you go to lecture, listen and take notes, and read a little you'll get an A.

4.0
3.0
BIO102
Jul 11, 2008

This teacher isn't bad at all as long as you're willing to put in the time and effort. My recommendation for doing well in 101-102 for Dr. Martin's exams: get the lecture outline from the mslc, take good notes during class, go over your notes and compare them with the outline. Use the book for clarity and for anything thats missing in your notes.

4.0
2.0
BIO101
Aug 12, 2008

ok, so everyone makes this lady seem to be a horrible teacher. if you just go to her lectures and pretty much write everything she says, its an easy A. I didnt use the book for any of the exams she made, just memorized the notes i took from lecture. just go to lecture, and write everything she says..it will be on the test.

3.0
3.0
BIO101
Dec 22, 2008

You don't necessarily have to read the entire book to do well on the final (I learned that the hard way. I almost went delirious from reading everything!). Definitely read notes, and you should be fine. The course seemed really dry at times, but it's okay, overall (I got a B in the course).

5.0
1.0
BIO101
Dec 29, 2008

I visited the first few lectures, and then stopped going (zzzzzz). I got an A. I read the book, and bought the study guide upstairs in the MSLC the night before each exam. Make sure you do well on the lab practical, it counts for a large bulk of your grade.

2.0
5.0
BIO101
Jan 8, 2009

she is an okay lecturer, you just have to go to class and take good notes, but the bio professors switch and when you get someone who is not martin you are screwed.

5.0
5.0
BIO101
Jan 14, 2009

need to go to lecture to get the material that will be on the exam. should have gotten an a but got a low b on the final so i got a b+ for the semester. martin is the best lecturer. helpful to go to her lecture review.

2.0
4.0
BIO101
Jan 19, 2009

really boring, dry material and she doesn't do anything to make it better. I went to class a couple times. just read from the book and listen to your lab TA.

1.0
5.0
BIO102
Jan 30, 2009

dont even go to lecture just read your textbook

2.0
5.0
BIO101
Jan 30, 2009

She is possibly Rutgers most hated! lol

5.0
2.0
BIO102
Feb 27, 2009

People complain about how he reads from the book, but that's because SHE WROTE THE BOOK. In any case, since you're going to have to use the book a lot anyway, the best way to study (in my opinion) is to get the notes from the MSLC (since she doesn't test everything in the book) and make <u>good</u> notes on the chapter and review 'em.

5.0
4.0
BIO101
Aug 2, 2009

One of the best teachers in the university. Lectures are clear and interesting. Takes a genuine interest in student learning, very accessible at office hours.

5.0
4.0
BIO1AN2
Aug 27, 2009

She's really just an old grandma and she fits the stereotype. She likes to ramble and talk about how things are pronounced but if you either listen to her lectures (boring) or read the book (special attention to diagrams) you'll be fine. Old exams are online studyblue or DC++ so go for it. Very strict with plagarism BE CAREFUL

1.0
4.0
BIO101
Nov 1, 2009

She puts slides on and expects you to copy everything and gets ad if you tell her to return to a slide if no one finished writing.She doesn't use sakai and if you talk to her after calss she wont even loo you in the eye!BAsically she is a horrible teacher who doesn't care for he students!

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Nov 8, 2009

don't bother going to lecture. went to every single one and almost none of it was related to the exams. she rambles and talks about things that aren't even close to important or interesting. just plain awful

3.0
2.0
BIO101
Nov 17, 2009

Martin is an average teacher. She is a bit boring and tries to be funny at times. She's not that bad, if you had a choice between Martin or someone else teaching on Cook/Doug, take martin because she makes a large portion of the exams. Just read the book and do the outlines, and you'll do fine if you study frequently (not night before).

2.0
5.0
BIO101
Nov 17, 2009

Teaching practice hints towards apathy.

1.0
4.0
BIO102
Dec 22, 2009

Horrible!

2.0
4.0
BIO101
Jan 19, 2010

Some people find Martin's lectures very helpful. Personally, I did not attend one lecture and did these things 2 weeks before each exam---read the chapters intensely and fully completed the outlines martin suggests after reading---and received a B.

2.0
5.0
BIO101
Mar 30, 2010

Make sure to bring a pillow to lecture. You will fall asleep at any time of the day when she opens her mouth. You would be better off sitting at home and reading the textbook (which she co-wrote).

3.0
5.0
BIO102
Apr 1, 2010

tries to mess up our lives by giving choices like: more than one of above, all of above, and none of above. Also test materials that are described in few sentences instead of couple pages.

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Apr 4, 2010

Insanely difficult. Moves quickly through volumes of slides in her lectures. What could be worse? The fact that you can't get any of her slides online. Something has to be wrong when <20% correct on a test is a what 75% of the students get. Takes pride in her coauthored book- needs to take more in teaching. Stay away if possible!

1.0
5.0
BIO101
Apr 23, 2010

She's way too difficult. All the Rutgers science students hate her.

2.0
4.0
GENBI102
May 5, 2010

Do not, under any circumstances take this professor for General biology lecture. She just reads the slides and can't answer any questions that are not answered in the slides because she doesn't know. Her English accent also doesn't help at all TAKE PROF GAUGLER, OR ANYONE ELSE FOR GEN BIO!!! AVOID MARTIN!!!

4.0
4.0
GBIO102
May 15, 2010

Dr. Martin is not really as bad as all these people comment. Her test questions are a bit tricky, but she gives out notes and pictures from her slides ahead of time so its easy to take notes. Got an A in both 101 and 102, no big deal

1.0
5.0
BIO102
May 19, 2010

Useless going to lectures. you are better off using that time doing something more productive.The Bio department prolly sucks as a whole but from amongst the 3 professors I've had - Martin, Transue and D'arville...Diana Martin was the worst, she is so boring and hardly teaches. make sure you study VERY hard-only way u can keep up ur A's and B's

4.0
4.0
BIO101
Dec 24, 2010

She isn't as bad as people say she is. She talks slow enough so you can write down good notes. Her lecture outlines will save your butt when studying for her difficult tests SO GET THEM. Yes, they are hard, but that means a bigger curve. Read the chapter before going to class and study hard. Science is hard, don't try to blame the professor.

5.0
2.0
BIO101
Dec 24, 2010

Buy her lecture notes (or copy/scan them yourself, just ask at MSLC). Go to lecture, because anything she doesn't cover in lecture won't be on the exams (even if they're mentioned in lecture notes). Her lecture reviews were helpful if you have questions, as well as TA office hours. Don't slack off in lab. She's a decent professor.

5.0
2.0
BIO101
Jan 7, 2011

Dr. Martin really is not as everyone makes her out to be. She talks slowly so it's easy to take good notes. Just be sure to get the lecture outlines at the MSLC! They are the most important things to study before her exams; maybe only 10-15 questions on the exam will not be covered in the outline. As long as you're willing to work, you'll do fine.

3.0
4.0
BIO101
Jan 14, 2011

i have to admit that I dozed off many, many times in this class! I tried typing notes to stay awake. I studied my notes and gave my heart and soul when reading the textbook. Got an A.

4.0
2.0
BIO102
Apr 3, 2011

I actually like Dr. Martin. She is a very nice person and although her lectures are sometimes boring, she makes up for it by making jokes. But, like most professors, she does expect students to read the book before attending lecture. The people who say this class is way too difficult probably barely make an effort in reading the book.

3.0
2.0
BIO101
Apr 24, 2011

exams are hard, study a lot. lectures aren't super useful. read, read, read. emphasize the material mentioned in lectures and go beyond by looking in depth at videos and such online. big curve.

3.0
5.0
BIO101
Aug 9, 2011

READ THE TEXTBOOK. Exams are very tricky. Need to know details. Read, outline, and study a lot. Labs are easier but read for those too. there is a quiz every week

1.0
5.0
BIO1012
Nov 7, 2011

Thank god this woman retired this year! She SUCKS and made me hate bio. They probably put her up there to bore the pre-meds so they would consider changing career plans. She was so oldschool and I'm glad that woman is gone from Rutgers. Transue took over and he is such a better professor than this woman. Kathy agnese(her ASSistant) SUCKS as well.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

53% confidence
Based on 1 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 1 reported grades
A+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.06 avg change
May
Dec
Jan
Apr
Aug
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

BIO2

5.0

(1)

BIO1AN2

5.0

(1)

BIO101AND102

4.0

(1)

BIO33

4.0

(1)

GBIO102

4.0

(1)
+19 more courses
Difficulty by Course

101119

5.0

GENERALBI

5.0

BIOLOGY101

5.0

BIO04

5.0

BIO10102

4.0

Similar Professors