3.5
Quality3.2
Difficulty40%
Would Retake176
Reviews40%
Would Retake
176
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
64
4
38
3
31
2
28
1
15
What Students Say
“Loves what she teaches and is incredibly helpful in providing feedback”
POLI210 - 5.0 rating“Stolle's a great person - really caring and helpful, whether it be in person or online”
POLI210 - 4.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
81%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.68 avg changeRatings by Course
SEX
5.0
(1)POLI212
5.0
(1)PS
5.0
(1)COMPPOLITICS
5.0
(1)COMPPOLI211
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
COMPPOLI211
5.0
POL210
4.5
POLI361
4.5
POLSCI211
4.0
POLI210
3.7
Reviews (176)
So incredibly boring. Course could be interesting but Stolle's monotony ruins it
No Comments
No Comments
No Comments
Funny and sexiest hair... ever!
The powerpoint princess!
Incredibly witty and enthusiastic about her fieldof study. Awesome prof & hair
Lots of reading in her class, but it gets more interesting over time.
Very competent and interesting. Needs more confidence when teaching. Overall A+!
Love the German accent, the hair, and the clothes. Oh, and a great prof too.
knowledgeable in technology and WebCT. Great woman!
BORING!!!!!!
You've got to give her credit for her astounding organizational skills
loves to give thumbs up...reading is huge, repetitive...german=efficient
No Comments
What was she thinking with all that reading? Hot psychopath.
u dont know what ure talking about EEEE-ZZZZ and HOT and SWEET and ENTHUSIASTIC
sweet lady, really organized and clear with the powerpoint, too much reading
Yeah baby, she is HOT!
Ridiculous class, reading=pointless, work=repetitive, hypothesis testing sucks
Very engaged and interesting, clear presentation
Interesting, organized, very intelligent... lots of reading.
Dietlind ist gut.
webct was AMAZING!
No Comments
No Comments
No Comments
dry class, tons of readings for an intro class, but fair exams
Very into her teaching and material. Reading can get tough, but stick with it. A really great professor and person.
This course should be called POLITICS OF GERMANY. Her class totally turned me off politics and she was not clear at all. She made a bunch of unsuported arguments and the workload was not that of a 200 level course. Overall this class sucked
Prof. Stolle is such an amazing professor and has an incredible perspective because she's from the former East Germany. There is a lot of reading because this is an introduction to comparative politics - a huge field of study!!!
i would take her again...
Pretty good prof overall. The course was easy and theren't wasn't that much work to do. Hard to find a better teacher, easy to do worse.
Poorly structured class, and poor notes. Too much personal opinion, and subject matter is not presented in the best possible way.
There was way more reading for this class than all of my other classes so that's what made it tougher. I found her humour a bit... bizarre/German but I really enjoyed her class and would take another tought by her.
Interesting if you are willing to put effort into reading. She makes the class fun with movie clips etc. Very large class though 600ish students.
If she could possibly lecture without reading her notes word for word she would be alot more interesting. She is passionate about her subject but obviously inexperienced
Lectures are pointless to attend half the time,and you don't really need to do the reading...however, if you do show up it is interesting and the readings aren't that bad...it's really what you make of it...what, you expected something useful??
ugh, painful. she's a nice lady, but she shouldn't be teaching comparative intro -- she should be teaching east-german politics/history classes.
very nice woman, but she needs to be teaching kindergarten. too touchy feely.
I really enjoyed prof Stolle's class. she really tries hard and is EXTREMELY helpful outside of lectures. You dont necessarily have to go to classes. Lots of reading tho....I would definitely take her again.
Excellent Instructor. Would surely take a class from her again. Her classes are really interesting, the only class where I always went to her lectures. Class was fairly easy but not too easy. Just read and go to class, really.
sucks
She is a wonderful teacher who makes the lectures as interesting as possible. Lots of reading though. However, going back i would take the class again and would take others she teaches.
Very interesting lectures...more reading than I had anticipated, but even the book/course pack selections are pretty interesting. I decided to pursure a comparative politics minor because of her class...I would definitely take another.
Waaaaaay over-rated professor. She spends more time on the graphics and animations for her lectures than the lecture material itself. If you get a bad TA with her, you're screwed. If you're TA is good you'll do well.
BEWARE: educated fools produce useful idiots - Dietlind is a fool, poli 211 is idiotic
Very good teacher, puts a lot of effort into the course (she even includes Simpsons and Family Guy episodes in her lecture). Also a very nice person, but some of the complaints about the nature of the course are true - it did get a little weird at times.
I prefer dungeon torture to attending her lectures- they were unbearable. The course mixed too many strong-minded individuals for any sort of group harmony. She's a great person though and her lecture on E. Germany was the courses saving grace.
Definetly good course for intro. Lectures are well-organized, use multi-media, fresh and enthusiastic. Even with 600, students are participating in class.
The topics were centered around her personal interests; women in politics, E. Germany, The Green Party- Latin America wasn't even mentioned. My lecture notes looked more like Stolle's autobiography!! And shes kinda scary lookin upclose
Oh how unfair...Loved this prof. She is very engaged, open to students, and totally into teaching. I decided to take more comparative politics because of this course.
rediculous amounts of readings for a 200-level survey course. conferences did more harm than good. could be a decent course. spent way too much time on democracy and not enough on other forms of political systems.
One of the most useless classes I've ever taken.
ridiculous amount of reading, too easy to fall behind, a bad TA and you're done (to be honest mine barely spoke english), needed better online notes
THE WORST PROFESSOR EVER. She lacks respect for her course, McGill, the USA and human decency (she gave an US-bashing lecture on Sept 11)
not as bad a ppl make her sound
at least she means well
she means well but her reading load is too heavy for a 200-level class... conference is brutal... interesting subject but she does it more harm them good, too much time spent on hypthesis testing and not enough time on actaully comparisons..
Eek! She reminds me of an SS officer. Always making creepy German jokes... WAY too much reading... Hypothesis testing Ad Nausium! Had to work my ass off to get a B+... stupid class. Turned me off politics. Try to avoid... but mandatory for some.
No Comments
It was just a perfect course, lively and engaged. The literature was state of the art, and very up to date, so at least I LEARNED something in this course, something you can't say from every course. It was worth the effort.
No Comments
I am a political science major in my third year and i took her class for fun. What a mistake. She takes the concept of introductory course way too literally--the course is all over and doesnt go in depth at all i hated the generalness of the whole cours
Great course. I just loved it. I've never seen someone doing her best like this. The syllabus was great, the slides, the lectures, the movies; just everything. I'm trying to be objective here, but I really enjoyed this course enormously.
Lively, engaging. One of the best courses I ever had.
Just great.
One of the best!
The best. A real introduction into scientific thinking. I can understand that some of the poorer students don't really appreciate it. But they miss a lot.
good, but sometimes maybe a bit difficutl.
What a horrible prof. She can't speak Enligsh properly, nor can she clearly outline and teach the most basic of concepts. She should be relieved of her teaching position.
Hey are you sure this was the right course? This was a good solid course. Well, apparently some people didn't get it.
GOOD.
Great course, I really liked it.
What a great Prof. One of the best classes I have had in Poli Sci.
Clear. Concise. Good.
Looking back at it: yes, I did LEARN something here. OK, quite some reading, but it was worth it.
Good Lord, what a boring class. Dietlind is pretty cool, though. Definitely very thorough w/ slides and WebCT stuff. The course was definitely enriched by her personal experience, and especially by her research in social capital.
Great course.
Loved it, very inspiring and research oriented.
intro class so a lot of readings, but great prof who devotes a lot of time and energy to teaching... does a great job in bringing in the topics she studies/researches into the class.
Just great, at first I was not really thrilled by the topic, but she really got me interested in it, it is a very lively and well-prepared course.
This course really is an eye-opener. We had to read a lot, but it was real exciting, a kind of opening up the world. She makes a huge effort to make it fun, great.
ruined me on political science. destroyed the field for me. she reduced it to numbers...
Very intelligent. She is enthusiastic and bright, but her exams are a little rough. You can study real hard and still not get the grade you deserve.
Very interesting class and good professor. Definately a requirement if you're going into poli sci. The exams aren't easy but if you do all of your reading you'll do ok. If you put some effort in you'll do really well. Definately a course to take.
No Comments
So so much democracy... so little else. Still not really sure what we were "comparing." The class was entertaining at times and I enjoyed the guest lecture. Not bad overall, but if I have to do one more hypothesis test I'm going start hitting people with my coursepack.
Strange, as opposed to someone on this board, I learned much more about life under communism and in other such countries than in many other classes. Very engaged and enthusiastic prof, handles large class very well, even talks to students in lectures. Great intro to social science.
this course seemed very promising for the first two lectures. then I realized the course should be called "comparative politics of wealthy northern european countries" and it was a total waste of my time. easy A though and strangely a prereq for a lot of good sociology courses.
Ive never met a university prof who had favourites so much! It's kind of insulting. Your grade will depend entirely on your TA; choose conference carefully. Sometimes made other appointments during her office hours & then makes you feel bad for making her late for them. Overall meh, I'd give her a B
A really good and fun lecturer.
She makes a potentially boring class super fun.
No Comments
She has turned me off Poli Sci for life. The best parts of this course was when she had guest lectures or showed film clips, but only because I didn't have to listen to her. She's nice (plays favourites though), and has really good slides, but could not teach if her life depended on it.
Wow, was I in the same class? Smart, funny and interesting teacher, well organized lectures. Learned a lot.
The lectures themselves could be tedious and a little boring. However, looking back I did learn alot. If you want a straight forward poli sci course this is a good choice. If you want a course that goes into depth this is not what you are looking for.
a very enthusiastic, affable person whose course you should never take.
Class was alright, fairly easy, somewhat interesting. She is not very hot and she kind of teaches like an elementary school teacher, not very professional in my opinion.
An okay teacher but by the end of the semester her accent will drive you to a psychotic episode. It's not "Today we gonna..." it is "Today we ARE GOING TO....". You think that a University professor with a PhD who has been living on the continent for two decades could figure this out on their own.
You will have to do a lot of reading but it is well worth it. Dietlind is a pretty chill prof who cares about her students. If you do the readings and attend lectures you shouldn't get less than a
Worst Poli Sci teacher EVER....
Nice.
Nice, very organized, with nice slides. Can be extremely boring though. The class is too basic for her to be interesting, I suppose, considering how little actually gets covered in any depth.
No Comments
Stolle is okay...you really don't have to go to lectures because she is Dr. WebCT but if you you'll be enriched. Do the readings and study well and you won't get less than a B.
Amazing professor, one of the best I have had. Engaging, caring, and extremely interesting. I don't see how anybody can complain about her, unless they just couldn't cut it in her class.
No Comments
excellent lectures and awesome online help
No Comments
I dunno what that last user was thinking (???) although now that I think about it she was attractive. She puts everything on WebCT and the exams are quite fair. Sometimes talks to herself randomly for no readon though. Fun, though somewhat tedious, intro poli sci class...recommended.
I love Dietlind. Her accent is sexy and she is a bright lady. Very passionate teacher, which is more than you can say about most of the Poli Sci Dep't. I wish I got to know her better during the class. Excellent use of WebCT too. She probably reads ratemyprofessors, so if you're out there -- WELL DONE! You are HOT!
Lots of Enthusiasm. Makes the class very fun. Sometimes I wish she had taken a stance on some issues, to have more intense debates. I felt like she often just went topics on the surface, instead of going into them on a deeper level (ie Islamophobia). However, her speciality is Comp. Politics, and she's very good at it!
The class was really easy, but I learned a lot. Stolle is a great teacher, she's very passionate and has some fascinating personal anecdotes. She's also extremely nice, and actually approachable. Encourages debate by remaining neutral on issues. Great prof.
Great prof! I would recommend this class to anybody. However, I do agree with a previous comment; Stolle tends to just break the surface on a lot of topics without providing much detail which can be frustrating. The textbook is informative, though. Exams were on the easy side.
Great prof! I love her! She obviously loves what she does, is energetic and tries to communicate her enthusiasm to you! It was a very interactive class, she encourages debate, and loves clickers and WebCT! The class wasn't easy but if you do the readings and study there's no reason you shouldn't get a good grade.
Course material is far from challenging, but the Professor seems to set her students for failure with overly long exams. 1 hour and 20 minutes to complete multiple choice, IDs, Graph analysis and hypotethical research design question...she does post study guides which are VERY helpful, but the exams are too long to be successful!!
Shes such an amazing person and a great prof! She makes sure everyone does well and she's always there for you. Her class is fun but there's lots of reading to do and there some guest lectures which are REALLY boring and just make the class hard but besides that, great class! Learnt a lot of new things regarding poli sci researching.
She is very engaging, enthusiastic and seems to love what she's teaching. She's not only very helpful in person, but also via email. She usually responded within an hour all the time. Would recommend, and would definitely re-take a course with her.
Stolle's a great person - really caring and helpful, whether it be in person or online. She clearly wants her students to do well and she's so bubbly, it makes classes (slightly) more bearable (the content is just so, so dry). The TAs, on the other hand, aren't so great - 1 page assignments take 3 weeks to grade, feedback is vague and unhelpful.
A lot of people complained that she assigned too much work, but guess what - welcome to college! I found the class very straightforward, and if you did all the readings, came to all the lectures and didn't spent the entire time on Facebook, you wouldn't have a problem doing well. Plus it's apparent she loves her job as a teacher.
Poli 210 is feasible. What I regret was to wait until the end of the semester to seek help. But GET READY TO WORK. You'll have various chapters to read each week and be expected to know them by heart for the midterms. Plus assignments each week and quizzes. But the good thing is that she doesn't put 75% of the class grade on the final.
To summarize: The best thing about this course is that there are so many assignments that your midterm and final are not the only things that matter. The worst thing about this course is that there are so many assignments that your midterm and final are not the only things that matter. p.s very boring material but great prof.
The prof is great and caring, but the material is so boring. Wouldn't have taken this course if I knew how much assignments count. Word of advice, if you want to be able to do the assignments, be present at the conferences.
Dietlind is one of the most passionate professors and loves what she teaches. The class is interesting and informative but you have to keep up with all the readings and homework. A lot of assignments on which you will spend a lot of time but if you want to do research later on then take this class. Don't take it out of fun.
Course can be a bit boring and basic at times, but I found the tedious assignments to be quite relaxing. Proff Stole might not be the best teacher in the humanities department, but she does a good job and is clearly passionate about what she teaches. Now the second midterm was soul crushingly hard espetialy compared to the first, so be aware.
This class was very dull-unless you need to take it, I definitely wouldn't suggest it. LOTS of guest lecturers, often took away from the cohesiveness of the material. When she is lecturing, it's pretty easy material to follow and she isn't bad at her job, but there were way too many assignments and attendance is 15% of your grade which sucks.
She is truly one of the nicer professors at McGill, tries to have a true interaction with the class and is very clear even though some of the material can be difficult, it can be overcome easily by working and going to class AND conferences. However, the course is divided in a way you can get an easy A or A- with reading tests and participation.
Dull material. Takes a month to get the midterm grade back. Weekly quizzes and assignments. Updates the syllabus an excessive amount of times and yet it still isn't clear. SPSS program is taught in conferences only, which are dull, unclear and very unhelpful. Don't take this class if you can avoid it.
Dietlind was nice and funny but the course content was just so boring. SPSS data program was so hard to use and the TA's didn't do a great job teaching it. Would never take this course again but would take another one of Dietlind's classes.
I found the SPSS program that we had to use really difficult. There are a lot of readings and small quizzes/assignments throughout the semester which can be good since not all the weight is put on the exams, but also means you're putting a tons into the class throughout the semester. I like Dietlind as a person but dreaded her class
she's an alright prof. The class has so many little assignments that take way too long to complete for it being 2% of your grade. It would take months to get the smallest assignments back. Lectures were alight.
Only take this class if you need it for honours, because the material is boring. Prof Stolle is clearly super smart but isn't great at explaining some basic research concepts. I actually liked that there were so many SPSS assignments because it makes the final assignment easier to complete. The reading quizzes also made it hard to fall behind.
Worst prof I ever had at McGill. She doesn't even teach half the classes, which makes it hard to adjust to the various teaching styles presented throughout the semester. For the classes she does teach, she focuses 90% of her time on turning point and is very unclear. Don't bother going to her office hours either, she's rude and unhelpful.
Overall a pretty average prof. She's extremely smart, kind, and has a good sense of humour; but often spends too much time on in-class surveys. Uses many guest lecturers, which can detract of the continuity of the course. Gives many small-medium assignments & weekly reading quizzes, as well as participation marks, so your grade is well spread out.
Easy relative to other poli courses. The polling she uses for attendance broke a lot. Most of the class is taught by TAs so go to them if you have any other questions: they are super helpful. Stolle is also extremely knowledgeable and experienced so even though its TAs marking all your stuff, she's great to talk to if you're genuinely interested.
Best class I've taken so far at McGill. Different from other Poli Sci classes in a good way. This class puts the "science" in political science. Loved loved loved Prof Stolle -- she knows her stuff and is great at presenting it. My only issue with the class was the amount of guest lecturers. I understand why she does it, but I wanted more of her!
Professor Stolle was one of my favourite professors at McGill. She is caring, compassionate, and loves to hear from students on interesting ideas for research projects they have. Loves what she teaches and is incredibly helpful in providing feedback. Clear grading criteria and very approachable for extra help. Easy A if you do the readings.
Not a brilliant lecturer - relies too heavily on polling to try and explain concepts for her. Also found that she wasn't very communicative to students, and when I tried to reach out to her she was just kind of unpleasant to me, and way ruder than I was expecting. Take her if you have to, her class is easy, but not fun.
Maybe the least communicative professor I ever had. Relied a bit too heavily on polling and guest lecturers, and the lectures weren't terribly captivating. Seemed like a nice enough person, but not terribly understanding. It's an easy class to do well in if you keep up with the workload, but not a very fun one.
This is a good class for learning some skills and how to do research. The prof is very nice and really cares that students learn the material. Makes dry materials super fun. Lots of office hours, very accessible. There are many assignments and quizzes but I felt that helped me keep up the pace in this class. take it if you can.
Prof Stolle is very sweet, she gives engaging and interesting lectures and makes the content accessible. She pays close attention to feedback and she is easily accessible outside of class. I would totally recommend POLI210 as an introduction to research methods.
Fantastic Lecturer. She changed the marking scheme for the P/F assignments (10% of grade) to basically become normal assignments, just out of 2, halfway through the course. Participation mark made no sense - Received absences for when I was present, and was marked present when I was absent R assignments are too long for too little marks..
She's a really nice person, but I didn't like the class. Each week there's 2 quizzes, lab assignment, 1hr lab, lectures, reading (that got progressively longer), 1.5hr zoom & often another assignment or midterm to top it off. TAs mark assignments harshly to maintain the average given the sheer number of quizzes. Relied a lot on TA & guest lectures.
Quite literally one of the worst teachers imaginable. She frontloads all her work as the week starts, so it's nearly impossible not to feel as if you have no time to complete what she's asking you to do. Two quizzes, a lab, hours of lectures and readings every week, with complicated unclear assignments that often are graded harshly every two weeks
Not a very great prof honestly. She assigns an assignment that ends up taking a few hours each week, and gives out 3-4 lecture and reading quizzes every week too. Her lectures tend to be long, and the readings she assigns are REALLY dry! Otherwise, I guess she's nice as a person
Wayyyyyyyyy too much work during our first online semester.
maybe it was just because she doesn't know how to teach online but her class was absolutely horrible. she assigns way too many assignments and quizzes that take a ridiculous amount of time to complete.
There are way too much quizzes and lectures. Each week, the recorded lecture takes about at least two and half hours, sometimes four hours. And the readings are too much to process. The final exam is especially ridiculous, which asks stuffs that we never learned in class.
Avoid this prof if you can. Her class was probably the worst class I have taken in my 3 years at McGill. My 300-level profs don't assign as much work as she does. Not to mention her final was much much much harder than anything we learnt in lectures and readings
She clearly loves research methods and is really nice. We had 2 quizzes and an assignment per week on average, so if you do badly on something it shouldn't affect your grade too much. The assignments take too long for what they're worth. If you find it easy to keep track assignments go for it, personally I found it overwhelming.
I honestly have mixed feelings towards this professor. She's funny and loves to teach and generally a good person but her class was intense. There was quite a bit of work and her expectations were high. Based on the positive reviews she's received in pervious years, I'm inclined to think it was because of online learning that she assigned so much.
Professor Stolle is brilliant in what she does, but her class was difficult, especially towards the end of the term. This class takes work, I (heavily!) recommend creating a work/study group, which will come in very handy during assignments and exams.
My online Fall semester was made very stressful because of this course. During the add/drop period she made the course look easy but after that, multiple long quizzes every week on the readings in addition to learning how to code and on top of that she would add day-long assignments. The amount of work is atrocious, hard, and feedback is too broad.
Prof. Stolle is passionate about the course material, and is very approachable. There are weekly quizzes and readings - helpful for accountability, but can be stressful. The coding assignments are not overly difficult but can be time-consuming (R is a great skill to have). More time should be devoted to the statistics portion. Solid course overall.
POLI 210 is difficult especially if you are new to coding. Stolle is a good prof but had a bad experience with TA's in her class that made an already difficult class much harder
You only get a surface-level introduction to research that really could be summarized on a 10-20 page PDF. The lecture-reading configuration kinda sucks; what you read gets dumbed down in class discussions and if you're not careful revising you risk glossing over the minutiae. That being said, Stolle and Erlich are nice enough.
The co-teaching made it very difficult as both profs had different styles of teaching. Prof. Stolle is very caring, she recognized that many students did not do great on the midterm and was willing to change the weight of the exam to better our grades. POLI 210 is pretty challenging and the exams are pretty long.
Very sweet and nice professor. Cares about her students and the course she is teaching. However, co-teaching made the course less clear and harder to follow. Get ready for a lot of quizzes, assignments and heavy midterms.
Professor Stolle is brilliant but the course is intense, especially with coding assignments and heavy workload. Definitely utilize resources like Unstuck ai and study groups to succeed.
Professor Stolle is a brilliant professor who is very passionate about her students learning. However lectures can be quite heavy and slides are disorganized. If you are a visual person and rely on slides for your studying this might be an issue for you!
Nice person, bad prof. Does not answer questions. Does not accommodate.
No accomodation for students. Questions on midterms are created to trick students. Structures course in a way that is not condusive to learning but to deter students from studying Poli Sci. Course in F2025 was restructured to essentially be 65% exams. You have no way to apply what you learn. TA Shirley was rude, unhelpful and unknowledgeable
Professor Stolle makes exams for this course difficult - be ready for averages in the 60s. If you are logic-minded and/or have taken statistics and are prepared to study really hard, an A is possible. The issue is there are no practice questions given, making it hard to apply statistical concepts. Study applications with ChatGPT and notebookLM!
This class is really difficult, lectures don't prepare you for the exams adequately, and the coding labs are disorganized and rushed, so everyone has to teach themself how to code pretty much. The class was so hard I dropped poli sci as a major. Not assignment-heavy at least, and readings aren't bad. Stolle keeps her lectures engaging.
this prof doesn't prepare you for exams and they are made to trick the students. The exam averages are extremely low and yet she says that the next exam will be even harder! She is a horrible professor and doesn't care about her students, or else she wouldn't make the midterms as hard as they are.
To any poli sci major out there, RUN. I took methods expecting it would be easy, however the 2nd midterm took me by surprise because none of the material was explained in class, and I had to teach myself most of the material. Prof Stolle does her best to be funny/relatable, but she doesn't explain much and goes over important detail way too fast.
Whatever you do, DO NOT take POLI 210 with Prof Stolle. In fact, don't take 210 at all if you don't have to. This class used to be an easy A-, but suddenly, it switched for fall 2025. The midterms are literally designed to trick you and the class averages for both were quite low. The only advice the profs offered was "learn more next time".
I don't even know what to say. Did these exact statistics in CEGEP and came out of POLI210 more confused than when I came in. Exams are indeed made to trick you, thankfully, I had a sweet TA, but RUN while you can.
While friends told me that the previous teacher's version of the class was great, Stolle obviously ruined it. As a class that used to have a high average, she should take some accountability when students aren't doing well. She managed to turn simple concepts into the most complicated issues and honestly should stick to research, not teaching.
I came away from every class feeling frustrated. Lectures were rushed, always went over time, and important concepts at the end were not covered, despite being on the midterm exams. Studying and understanding things in this class is your entire responsibility. The coding portion was not well done, leaving tons of students confused.
It was clear that students were not grasping concepts, yet she wouldn't take that as indication she needed to explain things differently. The statistics portion of the class was incredibly challenging & she didn't walk through examples to demonstrate. 2nd midterm was unfairly weighted to concepts she rushed through, not even explaining them well.
Although I am well-versed in statistics, I found this class much more difficult than I expected to. The coding was not explained and was made excessively complicated. They expect you to combine both halves of the course with coding, which they did not teach us. Lectures were heavy, boring, and not explained. If you can at all avoid this class, do.
Second midterm was 67% with a curve, poorly explains concepts, midterm includes concepts and exercises we barely (or not at all) touched upon in class. Poorly prepared for the midterm. Final was a bit more fair. If you've never done stats, she won't be of help at all, so get ready to do a lot of prep on your own.
The content was overly complicated, it is an intro to methods/stats and it was made way more confusing than the course material itself actually is. The stats and coding part of the course was very poorly executed, rushing through everything and giving nobody a chance to actually learn anything with professors/TAs guidance.
Better lecturer than popova, yet wouldn't explain concepts everyone misunderstood on the vevox, if you don't have a solid background in stats very hard to do in, questions made to trick you, concepts in final weren't even seen in class/ textbook/ conferences (ecological fallacy??) It's not an issue of preparation, just a badly taught course
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
81%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.68 avg changeRatings by Course
SEX
5.0
(1)POLI212
5.0
(1)PS
5.0
(1)COMPPOLITICS
5.0
(1)COMPPOLI211
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
COMPPOLI211
5.0
POL210
4.5
POLI361
4.5
POLSCI211
4.0
POLI210
3.7