1.8

Elayne Arrington

Mathematics - University of Pittsburgh

1.8
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
11%
Would Retake
193
Reviews
1.8
Quality
3.8
Difficulty
1.8
Helpful
1.7
Clarity

11%

Would Retake

193

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

8

4

15

3

21

2

57

1

92

What Students Say

My mind is blown as to how there could be such a bad teaching, non-research professor in existence

120 - 1.0 rating

Gives absolutely no help to students

MATH0200 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

80%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 16 grades
Most common grades:
A (4)
B (4)
A+ (2)
Grade Distribution
A(6)B(6)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 19 reported grades
A: 4
B: 4
A+: 2
Not sure yet: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (3)
Skip class? You won't pass. (3)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (3)
TEST HEAVY (3)
Tests are tough (2)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
Get ready to read (1)
Would take again (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.04 avg change
Mar
Oct
Dec
Jan
Apr
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

MATH040

5.0

(1)

MATH1900

4.0

(1)

MTH202

4.0

(1)

CALC1

3.0

(4)

CALCULUS

3.0

(1)
+50 more courses
Difficulty by Course

120

5.0

CALC3

5.0

CALC0220

5.0

CALC2

5.0

MAT120

5.0

Reviews (193)
4.0
3.0
MATH240
Dec 6, 2002

No Comments

2.0
4.0
MATH230
Dec 10, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
MATH0240
Dec 11, 2002

No Comments

3.0
3.0
MATH0240
Dec 11, 2002

Way to smart to be teaching. Talks way over my head.

2.0
4.0
MATH0240
Dec 11, 2002

Assume you already know what to do...kinda hard of hearing too

1.0
5.0
MATH240
Dec 11, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
CALC3
Dec 12, 2002

No Comments

3.0
2.0
MATH220
Dec 14, 2002

Gives easy tests compared to others

2.0
1.0
0220
Dec 15, 2002

No Comments

2.0
2.0
MATH0380
Jan 14, 2003

Nice enough person, but poor teacher. Relies on examples w/no explanation.

2.0
4.0
MATH0220
Jan 27, 2003

No Comments

4.0
3.0
MATH1900
Feb 17, 2003

Great direction for my work in Pitt's Puzzle Play Program

1.0
3.0
MATH240
Feb 19, 2003

worse than sitting in bathtub of scissors

2.0
4.0
MAT1000
Feb 21, 2003

Had her for trig 9 years ago, she sucked then

3.0
2.0
0220
Feb 23, 2003

decent with calc one but can leave her attitude at home!

2.0
3.0
MATH220
Mar 7, 2003

Can't teach, but tests aren't that bad.

2.0
2.0
MATH220
Mar 13, 2003

eh...easy tests...lousy teaching...extremely difficult department final exam...take someone else for this course.

1.0
4.0
CALC
Mar 13, 2003

No Comments

1.0
3.0
MATH
Mar 13, 2003

No Comments

4.0
2.0
MATH0240
Mar 16, 2003

This is one of the best professors you can have for the calculus sequence. If your focused in class, do the light homework assignments, and practice exams you will do very well.

1.0
2.0
MATH0230
Mar 17, 2003

A typical class consisted of her redoing a problem she messed up last lecture, then proceeding to attempt another problem she didn't know how to do, which she would stare at, ask for someone's book, and finish next time.

5.0
2.0
MATH220
Mar 19, 2003

Gives exams that are easier than those given by other professors. Gives about 5 problems per week for homework. Very helpful outside of class and is a good teacher as long as you go to lecture and pay attention. Put in the work, and this is an easy A.

1.0
2.0
MATH0220
Mar 23, 2003

No Comments

1.0
3.0
MATH0240
Apr 8, 2003

No Comments

3.0
3.0
MATH120
Apr 12, 2003

Tests are fair, final too hard, note as well that she cant teach

1.0
5.0
MATH0220
Apr 14, 2003

No Comments

4.0
4.0
MATH0220
Apr 17, 2003

I'm repeating calc one and find that she is teaching topics my last professor didn't cover. If I had her last semester, I would have done well on the final. I would seriously consider taking her!!!

2.0
4.0
MATH230
Jun 17, 2003

No idea, but i took Calc 2 twice, the first time was with this lady. She is horrible, don't take her.

1.0
3.0
CAL
Jul 23, 2003

This professor is horrible! She doesn't know what she's talking about, messes up on problems, and is very unhelpful. Whatever you do don't take this professor.

2.0
5.0
CALC1
Jul 27, 2003

It was outrageous how awful she was, she sucked, dont take her unless you want to die, NOTE always check the trash bin for undeleted labs in maple assignments

2.0
4.0
MATH0220
Sep 4, 2003

No Comments

1.0
4.0
MATH
Oct 10, 2003

She sucks so hard. I hated every minute of Calculus. She has the weirdest eyes, and seems very aloof at all times. High-maintenance and very unhelpful. I hate that woman.

1.0
4.0
MATH220
Oct 25, 2003

She is a terrible teacher. She breezes through the material as fast as possible to get it all done in one class. Be prepared to learn almost everything by reading your book if you opt to take her. She does make the tests slightly easier than that homework

2.0
4.0
MATH0220
Nov 3, 2003

One of the worst at Pitt! Wouldn't recommend at all. Not effective at explaining materials, speeds through chapters, doesn't seem willing to help. If you have no previous knowledge of Calc I would NOT take it with her.

2.0
4.0
MATH220
Dec 5, 2003

horrible teacher, unapproachable, blocks the board as she writes, homework is impossible... take anyone but her!

1.0
4.0
0220
Dec 11, 2003

This lady is terrible. She assumes that since she knows the material then her students should as well. Rushes through the book and makes the homework impossible. If you do get her drop it immediately or run away and never show ur face at pitt again.

2.0
4.0
MATH220
Jan 4, 2004

wish she would learn how to teach so i can learn calc

2.0
5.0
MATH0220
Feb 9, 2004

Do not attempt this class unless you're a Grad math major. It seems as if, since she knows the material, you should too, and so doesn't teach it effectively. She gets annoyed whenever someone gets a problem wrong, but tries to pass it off as humor.

1.0
5.0
CALC0220
Feb 16, 2004

Not helpful at all. Thinks that everyone in the class knows as much as she does. Very unapproachable. I have learned NO calculus at all from her. Do not take her.

1.0
5.0
MATH0220
Feb 27, 2004

No Comments

1.0
5.0
CALC0220
Mar 16, 2004

This is the worst professor in the world. She doesn't answer questions and she can't teach.

2.0
4.0
MATH280
Mar 25, 2004

boring, difficult to communicate and reason with

1.0
5.0
MATH220
Apr 20, 2004

Awful! I couldn't get any help and she basically made fun of me after the final. She chased me into the hall and was like well you got that one right, but the rest are a little ify!

4.0
2.0
CALC1
Aug 17, 2004

She is OK! but make sure you do a lot of homeworks. I barely showed up and got a B+. So make sure you study on your own!

1.0
5.0
MATH220
Oct 3, 2004

Avoid taking her calc class at all costs

2.0
1.0
MATH430
Grade: Rather_Not_Say
Oct 13, 2004

Didn't know the material, or atleast didn't show it.

1.0
5.0
BUSCALC
Oct 28, 2004

Worst teacher ever. Just read the book and learn from that....She teaches everything in lecture as if you already know it. Dont take this prof.

3.0
3.0
MATH0120
Nov 14, 2004

She teaches the class as if you should already know how to do calculus. She is really a horrible teacher. Tests are basically from examples in class though, and not too hard. If you already had calculus in high school, take it. If not, definately don't expect to learn in from her.

2.0
5.0
CALC2
Nov 16, 2004

Boooooo!! Poor teaching skills; she "teaches" as if you already know the material. Don't expect to learn anything from her. Bad experience in calculus.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Nov 16, 2004

If you ask a question, she answers with "why dont you know that?"

2.0
3.0
BUSCALC120
Dec 22, 2004

Expect to learn 90% of the material on your own. Uses the most complicated approach on simple things. Fine if you've had it before, stay away if new to calc. Tests are similar to practice tests. No personality and make sure to speak loudly 90% sure she has a hearing loss.

1.0
3.0
MATH0032
Dec 31, 2004

One of the worst math teachers I've ever had. Students try to ask questions but she never understands what you're asking. Almost everyone stopped going to class to avoid her pointless lectures. I took Trig in high school and she confused me on things I had already mastered. TA saved us. Avoid her!

2.0
4.0
BUSCALC
Jan 4, 2005

don't take this lady. i focused on applying myself and still went to waste with this one. Rob, my TA, was an angel and should teach the class because it would then be worth getting your ass out of bed for. find someone else guys, really.

1.0
5.0
BUSINESSCALC
Jan 7, 2005

terrible teacher with a vile personality. nasty and unapproachable. she acts as though everyone should be born knowing calculus. don't take this class if you've never had calc before. run away while you can.

1.0
4.0
CALC
Jan 12, 2005

She is a terrible teacher. Try to avoid her class. When trying to help you she "talks at" you rather than talking to you. I used to be a mathematics major...

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Jan 14, 2005

Really horrible teacher. Talks to the board, not to the class. Goes through stuff so fast that I am not even done writing the notes yet, and she's moved on.

4.0
1.0
MTH202
Grade: C-
Jan 15, 2005

She is a great teacher but she is relly hard when she does things other students don't like her because she's strict but I like her!!

3.0
1.0
BUSINESSCALC
Jan 27, 2005

The homework, quizzes, and tests were all easy, but don't expect to do well on the final. It screwed me over. If you have any background in calc, the class is easy and doesn't consume much time.

1.0
5.0
MAT120
Jan 28, 2005

If you have no calculus background this instructor will be murder, or suicide should i say? Seriously I wanted to jump out the window during lecture. She responds to questions with "why dont you know that?" Hope you can teach yourself cause she sure won't. AVOID THIS INSTRUCTOR!

1.0
4.0
CALCULAS
Feb 14, 2005

She expects you to know the info already. Does not explain the material clearly. Her sample tests are not a sample of the test or even concepts. I taught myself from the book having no calc background. How bad are u that the book teaches better than the prof? I'm not even sure why i went to class!

1.0
4.0
BUSINESSCALC
Mar 16, 2005

she went too fast in class and did not clarify what she was saying... she would sit up there and do problems and thats it.. no explanation or anything... she's not a good teacher period.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Mar 17, 2005

She might be the most double sided teacher on the block...gives one test to study from...then screws you on the actual exam...also doesnt teach at all.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Mar 21, 2005

SERIOUSLY avoid at all costs. I think she tries to screw people over on the exams, they're ridiculous. She reads and writes on the board from an old notebook during lecture, doesn't actually teach at all. If you've never taken Calc before you don't stand a chance with her...RUN!!

1.0
5.0
BUSINESSCALC
Mar 23, 2005

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. i had calc in high school and did well but she is the worst teacher ever and is not at all helpful. her tests are so hard and the final will kill you. not only that but sitting in her class feels like some horrible punishment. if i could get one teacher fired it would be her!

1.0
4.0
CALC220
Apr 4, 2005

She's very good at...implementing academic suicidal notions into her students' mind. Several times I thought about jumping out of the 7th floor window due to her lack of logic, explanation, charisma...what-have-you to coherently relate calculus material. She'll alienate any living organism.

1.0
5.0
CALC
Apr 7, 2005

No Comments

3.0
3.0
CALCULUS
Jul 18, 2005

It will be better if you have taken calculus before, lets say, she is not good at teaching, but she knows calculus. I would recommend if you dont know that much about calculus, then dont take her

2.0
3.0
BUSINESSCALC
Jul 19, 2005

I didn't like her very much. I found her very intimidating.

1.0
3.0
TRIGONOMETRY
Grade: A
Aug 15, 2005

No Comments

1.0
3.0
BUSINESSCALC
Aug 29, 2005

Horrible...Goes too fast in class and makes you feel like an idiot if you ask a question. Hard to follow. I got a B but I basically taught myself. Read the book, it's pretty good at explaining things, because she certainly won't help you. You'll like your rec. teacher better than her

2.0
1.0
MATH2010
Sep 7, 2005

You know the expression "those who can, do; those who can't, teach"? Well, Dr. Arrington can't teach. So she teaches teaching. Her classes are a masterclass in how not to run a recitation. She actually inspires bad discipline! I have never seen such a badly behaved class of math grad students (not usually the most rumbunctious group).

1.0
4.0
BUISNESSCALC
Sep 22, 2005

No Comments

1.0
5.0
BUSINESSCALC
Sep 26, 2005

SHE IS THE ABSOLUTE WORST TEACHER I HAVE EVER HAD! MATH WAS MY FAV. SUBJECT BEFORE HER. SHE SUCKS. IF U CAN GET OUTA TAKING HER- DOOO IT!!!!

1.0
4.0
CALC220
Grade: A+
Oct 13, 2005

she is an awful instructor. she makes u feel like an idiot when you ask a question and never gives a valid answer. i used 2 like math then i withdrew from her class cuz she was awful. try as hard as u can not 2 have her. don't get me wrong, she knows her material but is a horrible teacher.

2.0
3.0
CALCI
Grade: B
Oct 22, 2005

She specializes in teaching although, she is not that accomplished at it. Boring lecturer if I recall (I had her almost 8 years ago as a freshman)

2.0
3.0
CALCI
Oct 22, 2005

She is interested in teaching but not very good at it despite her academic specialization is pedagoogly (sic). Besides that, yes, exams are very difficult if not impossible but regardless it is a hard class to fail unless you totally give up. As long as you do homework and do OK on exams (by OK I mean at least D or above) you can probably finish with a C in the class.

2.0
5.0
CALC220
Oct 27, 2005

SHe's horrible...she cant explain anything and if you ask a question she makes u feel like an idiot and she expects you to correct her mistakes when she's the one teaching US the material!!!! She's the worst!!

1.0
5.0
MATH0041
Nov 10, 2005

she is horrible.

2.0
4.0
MATH220
Nov 18, 2005

Very hard to understand. She mumbles as she writes on the board and makes you feel like a total idiot if you ask her any questions in class. It's always, "You should know this!" One time she had the whole class laughing at this student who asked a simple question. Tests can be little tricky, but she gives out practice exams.

1.0
4.0
MATH220
Nov 27, 2005

No Comments

2.0
5.0
MATH0220
Grade: B
Nov 28, 2005

She is by far the absolute worst math teacher i have ever had. She sucks at explaining, basically she sucks at teaching in general. Do not take this class with her, and don't go to lectures becuase she will just confuse you. If you have her, its better just to switch out of it and get someone who can actually help you learn.

1.0
5.0
MATH220
Dec 7, 2005

Condescending, boring, the list goes on. On a personal basis she can be nice and informative. I'd definitely say she needs a little help with...what's that thing that teachers need...oh yeah, the ability to teach.

1.0
4.0
MATH0220
Dec 15, 2005

Obviously does not care about what grade her students get. Doesn't prepare you well for the final at all. She forced my class to learn the two most difficult lessons of the year on our own. Oh, and the class average on the last two tests was a 60%. Obviously, there's somethign wrong going on.

1.0
5.0
MATH220
Dec 22, 2005

She was terrible,seriously the worst teacher i have ever had, cant understand what she is talking about. You need to have taken calc before to even slightly know what she is talking about.

5.0
2.0
BUSINESSCALC
Jan 5, 2006

I hate math, but she made it fun. I don't understand all the harsh comments. I suck at math but I still got an A-. Lectures were well prepared, organized, and informative. I would highly recommend her because she makes complex mathematics more reasonable.

3.0
5.0
CALC1
Jan 14, 2006

I found her class very hard. I wouldnt reccomend her unless you took calc in highschool. I wouldnt call her a horrible teacher though. If you ask her a question, she KNOWS calculus. VERY WELL

2.0
4.0
MATH0220
Feb 20, 2006

She knows calculus, but I think she does a very good job of communicating to her class. I found it hard to follow her train of thought in class. She can also seem to talk down to the students when you ask a question.

1.0
4.0
MATH0400
Mar 17, 2006

This lady single-handedly messed up my qpa for good. She almost ruined me! I, and just about the rest of this class almost failed because of her refusal to answer questions or ever explain what she was talking about. Take business calc instead or just avoid her

2.0
3.0
MATH220
Mar 29, 2006

She tells you to read the chapters before class and MEANS it, assumes you've read the book and understand it while teaching. Refuses to teach algebra or trig-anything you "should" know. Just writes on board. Her practice tests are carbon copies for the most part of the real one so if you MUST take her study from them and pray you get an amazing TA.

5.0
4.0
MATH0220
Apr 13, 2006

Dr. Arrington is really not as bad as everyone says. She's actually a very nice lady. I had her for Calc I, which was the first time I've ever taken Calculus and I got an A in her class. If you do the homework and practice exams, you'll be ok for the tests. Plus if you go to office hrs she explains whatever you don't understand.

5.0
3.0
MATH0220
Apr 22, 2006

Dr. Arrington was helpful, clear, and explained to everyone who showed up for class EXACTLY what you need to know to do well on her exams. She even handed out lists of what to study. Don't listen to the whiners complaining about her teaching. She is fair, clear, and offers more than enough opportunity for extra credit on her exams to do well.

5.0
3.0
MATH0220
Apr 22, 2006

The people complaining about her not teaching Trig or Algebra are right - but both are prereqs for Calc 1. So if you don't know it, don't blame her. If you study her sample exams and the "cheat sheets" she gives out to study from, and if you show up for class, you'll do well in her class.

4.0
2.0
MATH0120
May 4, 2006

Yeah, she's not incredibly clear in class, but go to it anyway. Going through the motions should help you out period. Recitation is extremely important. Does not curve any 3 of her exams, but the departmental final is. On first two exams, class average was a 60... still no curve. If you do the practice exam, hw, and quizes, you'll be fine.

3.0
4.0
CALCULUS1
Jun 13, 2006

She is not as bad as everyone says, but I took Calc 1 and 2 in high school, and I found her difficult to follow in class. But she is very friendly and helpful outside of the classroom. Her practice tests are exactly like the exams so if you study them you will do fine. The homework is rediculous but if you get a good TA who gives you the answers, y

3.0
5.0
BUSCALC
Oct 30, 2006

Dr Arrington isnt as bad as everyone says.. she has some cool grading scales so if you do bad on 1 exam its not the end.. plenty of ways 2improve. My Rec. teach was amazing and really helped. Her sample exams are really close to the test to know those and ur good!

4.0
4.0
CALC0120
Nov 3, 2006

I really enjoyed this class, i thought she was a good teacher, but more importantly she was fair. If u go to the lectures and do a few hw problems u'll do fine. Her tests are reasonable (no suprises) and they almost mirror the practice tests exactly. I would take this class again if i could, Dr.Arrington is really personable one-on-one

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Nov 3, 2006

You teach yourself each lesson prior to each class. Turns out this was something I had to do so I could try to follow her confusing thought process in lecture. She talks down to students when they ask questions. The only plus side is that her practice exams are almost identical to her tests. Hope you get a really good TA.

2.0
3.0
BUSCALC
Nov 6, 2006

you teach yourself. go to recitation maybe not class all the time. her tests aren't that bad. the practice tests are really similar to the actual exam. one homeword a quiz each week but they are easy.

2.0
4.0
MATH120
Nov 8, 2006

Arrington is the worst. I was a straight A student in high school...math wasn't my favorite subject but I could get by. She teaches too fast, talks down to you and acts annoyed when you ask questions, and didn't help with me when I went to office hours. Find someone else to teach this class. It's hard enough with a good professor!

5.0
5.0
MATH0120
Nov 17, 2006

Tests are difficult, but she is good at explaining ideas. If you get confused you can always go to ehr office hours. Make sure to stay up to date with the lessons, otherwise it gets tough. Expect to read each section of textbook. Is very personable one on one.

4.0
3.0
MATH0120
Dec 20, 2006

Dr Arrington wasn't such a great professor. Her explanations were kind of vague. Despite the difficulty of some of her tests, she grades fairly. Even after skipping enough classes, I ended up getting an A, but I had Calculus AP in high school, so this was simple. So if you have had Calc before or go to most of her classes, you should do well.

2.0
1.0
BCALC0120
Jan 3, 2007

she is very unclear with her teaching..if you are good at going by the book than dont even bother going to class..its not needed at all..quizzes are crazy easy and the tests are just like the practice tests..and if she makes the final than u DEFINATELY want her because she prepares you the best for it

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Jan 4, 2007

Lectures consist of her talking and writing as fast as she can, while you sit there trying to catch up with her. Any questions you ask will be answered, but definitely not clearly answered. Her class was a pain in my rear the whole semester, avoid it if you can.

1.0
5.0
BUSSCALC
Jan 8, 2007

WORST TEACHER EVER!!! really unnapproachable, non-helpful, and impossible to understand. if you are in this class, GET OUT!

1.0
3.0
CALC0200
Jan 11, 2007

I had the misfortune of enrolling in Ms. Arrington's Business Calculus class. I had taken AP Calc a year before in high school, so I got an A+ in the course. But if you've never taken Calc, and need to learn from this "teacher," you will fail. Unclear, poor examples. Avoid if you're new to Calc; otherwise, an easy review!

1.0
2.0
MATH220
Jan 21, 2007

Skip lectures; go to recitation. Read the book and def do the practice exams. quizzes n hw are really easy. She makes the final, so by that time youre used to her toughness and do well while the other students suffer and complain. awesome curves. she doubles the 2nd test grade if you do better than the 1st test. same goes with the 3rd test.

1.0
5.0
BUS220
Feb 1, 2007

terrible teacher. ridiculed students for asking questions, and didn't explain concepts clearly. grade heavily depends on helpfulness of TA's

1.0
4.0
MATH0220
May 3, 2007

do NOT take unless you have no option.

1.0
5.0
MATH0230
May 10, 2007

don't take her class. she is really slow, and does not know how to explain the concepts.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
May 15, 2007

She is a terrible teacher. She doesnt like questions. And she pretty much assumes that you are an expert at calculus and will not explain anything. DO NOT TAKE HER. I failed her class and will be retaking it. Absolutely terrible.

1.0
5.0
MATH0230
Sep 6, 2007

Don't take this lady, simple as that. Take my word for it, take everyone's word for it. As everyone else stated, she hates answering questions. If you ask her to show you something she will say "Well that was just simple Algebra!" and then move on.

4.0
4.0
MATH230
Sep 7, 2007

Don't pay attention to the losers who failed calc with her as instructor. Calc is tough. Nuff said. She'll explain all you need to know to pass the class easily. Example tests are key to passing. Go to office hours. You get brownie points , learn the material and get to know her a bit more. She is honestly a great professor and woman.

2.0
4.0
MATH0120
Oct 5, 2007

I'd never taken Calculus before, so I had to read every chapter before class. If you haven't learned it before, you end up teaching it to yourself. When you ask questions she doesn't understand them, therefore she can't explain a clear answer. TA's are a big help, but try not to let Arrington confuse you in class. Overall, this course requires more

1.0
4.0
MATH120
Oct 17, 2007

Wow...just wow...please do not take this professor for any class at any time...if u somehow get stuck with her just go to the first class so u can see how she is...then, back away slowly, turn and run to the nearest add/drop form available and do yourselves and future students a favor...

1.0
4.0
MATH0220
Oct 17, 2007

No. Just no.

1.0
5.0
CALCUCALC
Oct 24, 2007

The professor is a good person but is very poor at teaching math. I took a math exam today and totally messed it up. Although I studied really hard for it, I didn't take it well. Ahhhhh! It makes me unhappy:(:(

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Dec 5, 2007

terrible. avoid if possible. if you didnt take calc in high school, and you get stuck with her, good luck. isnt clear on what she is teaching. assumes everyone knows calc as well as she does. just writes on the chalkboard all day, doesnt like questions, not approachable. not who you want teaching you math your freshman year.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Dec 14, 2007

seriously she is one of, if not, THE worst teachers/professors I've ever had (high school or college)and I'm a junior now. Tests are absolutely ridiculous. She doesn't really test if you know the material- she just puts the hardest possible problems on them. DO NOT TAKE HER... YOU WILL REGRET IT. Save yourself trouble and take another professor.

3.0
4.0
MATH0120
Dec 23, 2007

If you go to class and do your homework you should be fine. Don't blow off your work, because you'll get lost quickly. Tests are not easy. She gave the class an opportunity to raise grades by substituting a poor test grade with a better one. Homework is graded and there are weekly quizzes in recitation. Overall, good professor. Willing to help.

2.0
4.0
CLACSECT
Dec 28, 2007

she is the worst teacher I have ever had. Paying attention in class is hard because she skips important steps and stands in front of her work so it is hard to follow. the one time i went to her for help she made me feel bad about the amount of material i didn't understand.

2.0
5.0
MATH0120
Jan 10, 2008

Do not take her for business calc, period.

2.0
2.0
BUSCAMATH
Feb 9, 2008

Very easy to get a good grade....you do not even have to attend class only recitation. The key is to know her practice tests inside and out they are very similar to the test.

3.0
3.0
MATH0120
Feb 29, 2008

She really isn't that bad. She'll get a little frustrated if you ask a dumb question because you don't make an effort to know the material, but she's a good professor and even sometimes entertaining.

1.0
4.0
MATH0120
Mar 7, 2008

She is not a good teacher. She writes examples on the board and expects you to decipher them. Her TA's are better teachers. Her exams consist of 7 to 9 questions which take at least 90 minutes...she gives you 50. Take another teacher!

2.0
4.0
CALCBUSI
Mar 23, 2008

She is a terrible teacher, the worst I've ever had. She doesnt teach, you can do better if you read the book.. actually, if the book does something differently and you get the answer correct on the exam she takes some points off.. she blocks the board while writing and doesnt explain material, the TA's are better teachers

3.0
3.0
CALC1
Apr 6, 2008

She is a very nice and intelligent woman. You have to read the material prior to coming to class or you will be lost. DOnt be afraid to ask questions even if she seems frustrated she will answer you. I got a C and I flunked all the exams, so she is very fair at grading. Do all the homework, read the book before hand, otherwise you will fail.

3.0
4.0
BUSCALC
Apr 21, 2008

hard. expects you to know the material walking into class not after. so, read before. do the practice problems. just dont get behind and it shouldnt be impossible.

3.0
5.0
MATH0120
Jun 3, 2008

i agree that she can be entertaining at times but only cause shes sarcastic and mean. exams are very hard but work in book is not impossible with some work. i had to drop the course even after going to many office hours with her. take another teacher if possible

5.0
3.0
MATH040
Jul 3, 2008

ok seriously though she isnt that bad.if you go to her office hours she is really helpful. maybe im just good at math but i didnt think it was that hard.if u were decent at algebra and calculus in high school then this class shouldnt be a problem for you. i did practice problems and office hours and got a A- so shes not that horrible.

2.0
5.0
HUH0120
Sep 22, 2008

She is very difficult. Hard to follow in class and does not even give you answers to homework, so how can you know if you do things correctly? avoid if possible

3.0
2.0
CALCBUS
Oct 2, 2008

this was business.. i had calc before so knew what i was doing. She did an okay job at teaching, 3 tests, if you do better on the 2nd than on the 1st, get the second grade for both and same for the 3rd test (final) great deal! tests were exactly like practice test. eaaasy

1.0
3.0
BSCLCBUS
Oct 27, 2008

Worst teacher i have ever had. After about a month i quit going to class and just learned on my own from the book and practice exams. Awesome curves keeping your best 2 exams. Not a bad class to take if you already know calc or learn well from a book. Shes a joke of a teacher. good luck

2.0
3.0
BUSCALC
Jan 8, 2009

She talks very softly and if you want to see what she is writing on the board you better sit on the left side of the class (if you are looking towards the front). Not very easy to learn from but if you already know some Calc she is an easy professor to take. Not recommended for people new to the subject.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Jan 8, 2009

By far the worst professor I've had at Pitt. Condescending, mumbling, unhelpful, and generally sad person. Don't take her unless you want a big fat F on your transcript, ESPECIALLY if you haven't taken calc before like in high school. seriously, i'm not exaggerating here.

2.0
4.0
MATH2010
Jan 15, 2009

She arrives late every day, only to announce that she still needs to make copies of the handouts... and she thinks her students aren't taking the course seriously? Frankly, I'm shocked that the glaring hypocrisy hasn't clubbed her unconscious and dragged her back to its cave by now.

3.0
3.0
MATH0120
Feb 2, 2009

She's not that bad of a Professor. She's not helpful at all though. I got an A in the class because I did all the practice problems she gives, DO THEM and her class will be so much more easier.

2.0
4.0
MATH0120
Apr 5, 2009

HORRIBLE PROF. Unclear, impatient, expects you to know everything already, and she makes you feel like an idiot any time you ask a question or answer a question incorrectly. If you take this class, be prepared to do a lot of work and learn it on your own. And sit on the left side of the room bc she always blocks what she's writing on the board.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Apr 23, 2009

If you show up to class and she is your teacher just leave! Withdrawl ASAP! Unless you just took calculus last semester it is going to be rough. She gets mad if you ask a question in class, like you should already know how to do caclulus. You will have to teach this course to yourself or find someone to teach it to you. BEWARE!

2.0
4.0
MATH0120
Apr 29, 2009

She has some tendencies that are difficult to deal with including the fact that she teaches too fast and does not explain concepts well. She also tends to skip steps in her explanations. On the positive side, her curve is amazing! I got to c's and a b on the tests and ended the class with an A- and oh the final is not too bad at all!

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Jun 22, 2009

SHE WAS UNDOUBTEDLY THE WORST TEACHER I HAVE EVER HAD...IT IS A SHAME I PAID TO BE IN HER PRESENCE. I REGRET TAKING HER CLASS AND I WROTE THE DEPARTMENT HEAD ABOUT HER AND HE SEEMED NOT TO CARE AT ALL. BOTTOM LINE IS A RETARDED SEA APE CAN DO A BETTER JOB THAN HER.

1.0
5.0
MATH120
Oct 28, 2009

A horrible teacher. The worst I've ever had. Her tests are alot like her practice test, but harder and with different concepts. If you know the practice test, know the "opposite" of the practice test more. The book tought me more, and I had to hire a tutor. Even with this, I failed her first two exams. Drop her asap. Even if youre good at math.

1.0
4.0
BUSCALC
Nov 5, 2009

Now to be fair I'm sure Dr. Arrington is a fine calc professor, the problem is that she believes that she is teaching an advanced calc class when most people take this as a beginner level class. Not helpful, she skips steps on the board and gets frustrated when you ask how she figured something. Genuinely a nice person but not much of a teacher

1.0
5.0
MATH120
Dec 15, 2009

Dr. Arrington is the worst choice you can make, and clearly, the worst choice pitt made. If you are fortunate enough to go to the University of Pittsburgh, then you are literate. Read this and other statements and heed them. If you take this class, you are taking a major risk with your gpa. If you've never taken calc, don't let her ruin it for you.

3.0
5.0
MATH0230
Jan 15, 2010

THIS WAS THE BIGGEST MISTAKE OF MY LIFE! She is a terrible teacher! I got a 4 on the AP test then I had her for Calc 2 and did terrible. She doesn?t explain concepts and is demeaning. Class is just a lecture, read the book. Her practice tests are hardly like her exams. This would be a good class to take if you want to kill yourself or your GPA.

2.0
4.0
MATH120
Jan 20, 2010

She is a horrible teacher. She puts her "notes" up on the board without explaining how she did anything and expects you to understand it all by yourself. I only got a B+ in the class because I took Calc in high school. I could have gotten an A though, but the final was hard. Study the practice tests, exams are almost identical AVOID HER IF YOU CAN!

4.0
2.0
BUSCALC
Feb 3, 2010

Don't let all these people scare you. I was so nervous to have her but I had Calc in highschool and did well, and this was basically entirely a review. She was nice to me if I visited her and I got an A+ (I'm no genius, but I am good at math.) If you have any background of Calc, just read the book. The book was SO clear.

3.0
4.0
MATH0120
Feb 22, 2010

AWFUL! Mildly helpful if you go to her office hours, but she approaches the course as if everyone already has a background in calculus. Her notes on the board are basically useless. The worst professor I have ever had. The class itself probably wouldn't be too bad if you have had calculus before...

4.0
3.0
MATH120
May 5, 2010

She is not bad at all despite what people say. Yes, she may be a bit vague in notes skipping steps and such. But she's willing to help you one-on-one. Her office hours are great. She stayed past her designated time just to help me once. You may have to self-teach some of the material to yourself, but all-in-all, Arrington isn't as bad as they say.

1.0
4.0
MATH0230
May 26, 2010

AWFUL! I'm sure she's a very nice woman to meet one-on-one, and supposedly her office hours might be okay, but her lectures are terrible. She is often arrogant and rude when students ask questions in class, and her notes are useless. I had to teach myself all the material the day before the final.

2.0
4.0
MATH0120
Aug 2, 2010

This was the worst class I've ever taken. I got an A because I read every chapter assigned in the textbook and studied with other people from the class. It was soo much work, and it wasn't even worth it. She's rude and not helpful. DO NOT TAKE A CLASS WITH ARRINGTON!

1.0
3.0
CALC220
Nov 3, 2010

Where to start. This woman is horrible. I took calc already but not the AP exam so I had her for calc. I don't know how people who haven't taken the course understood her. Her notes are useless and everyone could tell she didn't WANT to teach the course. She treated my class like we were stupid for not understanding her right away. Don't take her!!

1.0
5.0
MATH0220
Nov 13, 2010

shes horrible

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Dec 16, 2010

she is absolutely TERRIBLE. This was the worst class I've ever took and she is the worst teacher. She is rude, her lectures are pointless. TAs are useless also. DO NOT TAKE HER CLASS. It is a hard subject to begin with and she makes it impossible. You better get a tutor and read the book if you want an a. I hated this class and I am so glad its ove

2.0
5.0
MATH0220
Dec 24, 2010

If you have not already taken this class with a different teacher, do not take Dr. Arrington. It will be really hard for you to keep up. She does not take the time to explain concepts - she just jumps into the math, assuming everyone can keep up.

2.0
1.0
MATH0120
Dec 26, 2010

Negatives - Incomprehensible , she does the math on the board and everyone just blanks out. No1 understands anything and I had to refer to my book the entire time. Professor never replies to email , grades are late Positives - Easy exams , easy homework , easy worksheets and easy A if you put in a good amount of work.

2.0
3.0
MATH0120
Jan 2, 2011

You will be okay if you have Calc background, but if not, you are in for an impossible ride. The tests are pratically idencial to the practice tests, though. I ended with a B+ and took AP Calc (AB) in highschool. I would not recommend or call this class an "easy A." The class overall was pretty easy, but the Final was ridiculous.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Jan 8, 2011

This woman should not be teaching at Pitt.. her lectures are HORRIBLE, as is she.. completely rude to students and seems as if she does not want them to succeed. she did not prepare me for the final AT ALL.. word of advice: take cathy lennard for bus. calc... she is 100x better.

2.0
3.0
MATH220
Mar 14, 2011

Her tests are almost exactly like the practice tests and my TA was helpful. She puts an extra credit question on the tests too. There weren't any quizzes. It was hard to hear her (I just sat in the front). If you took calc and did well in it, take her. The people complaining here probably never did any of the optional practice problems or studied.

2.0
5.0
CALC0120
Mar 30, 2011

i had her for business calc, she is the most frightening teacher i have ever encountered thus far at Pitt. She teaches at the speed of light and is angry and demeaning when students ask questions. I would not recommend taking her class unless you have an incredible math background and are able to teach yourself or have a death wish.

1.0
4.0
MATH0230
Apr 3, 2011

Even with a calc background and being good at math, this was awful. BE PREPARED TO TEACH YOURSELF AND READ THE BOOK. She is very demanding and doesn't care. If you ask a question, be prepared to look like an idiot. You will want to find a group and someone that can explain well because she won't.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Apr 7, 2011

She is by far the worst professor I've ever had. She makes you feel like an idiot if you ask any questions, and does not care about your success. She cannot hear anyone behind the third row, and teaches at the speed of light. Be prepared to fail or teach yourself. Worst teacher at Pitt by far.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
May 2, 2011

I never usually look at rate my professor, but when I do, I usually take the comments with a grain of salt. I must say, everything written about Elayne Arrington is 100% true. She makes you look like an idiot in front of the class, teaches faster than you can blink, and is just an all around angry woman. DO NOT TAKE HER.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
May 2, 2011

Definitely the worst professor I have taken so far. I had to withdraw during the first semester and took Lennard instead. The class is hard but she does a horrible job at teaching it too, Lennard was way clearer and I ended up doing really well in Lennard. Avoid Arrington at all costs, she is the worst professor of all time.

1.0
3.0
MATH0230
May 4, 2011

arrington is literally the worst teacher i have ever had. people say that in a moment of hyperbole...but in this case it is 100 percent true. she is absolutely an awful teacher. she doesn't go over some topics that she puts on tests. you cannot even hear what she says when she talks. she moves through topics extremely fast. picture is funny though.

1.0
5.0
CALC0230
May 6, 2011

I tried really hard and went to the MAC center every week, but it didn't matter. Not any good

1.0
5.0
MATH230
May 10, 2011

Arrington had to be one of the worst professors I've ever seen. She talked into the board, stood in front of work she just wrote and talked in a barely audible tone (I sat front row) to explain it. She ignored questions or gave curt answers such as "That's how it is" and didn't help. Never explained examples answered by students. Overall, horrible.

2.0
5.0
MATH120
Jul 10, 2011

So I would ONLY recommend taking this class with this professor if you have some sort of Calc background from high school. Otherwise, she goes through material REAL fast. Homework and practicing problems is a MUST, otherwise you'll be lost.

1.0
3.0
MATH120
Jul 22, 2011

Okay, most of the reviews on here about her are true. She makes the class much more difficult than it needs to be. I basically taught myself, used the book, and got help (not from her)and was able to get an A. She makes you feel stupid if you ask questions,and likes to stand in front of the board after she is done writing so you cant see! Avoid her

1.0
5.0
CALC110
Nov 16, 2011

Avoid at all costs! She is the worst professor! She teaches as if everyone has already taken calc. Even if you did take it before (I did), it is still a nightmare. Her lectures are useless and her tests try to trick you. I can't even describe in 350 characters how bad she is. I had an A in AP Calc in high school. C with Arrington..you do the math

4.0
2.0
MATH0220
Dec 16, 2011

Not the worst calculus teacher. She gives fair exams and is reasonable about grading. In terms of teaching, she goes through all the proofs necessary in calculus (this is a good thing) and goes over enough examples in class. Quizzes are taken in recitation and are relatively easy. Overall, I'd recommend this professor.

4.0
3.0
MATH0230
Feb 8, 2012

Her class wasn't as bad as most people going in thought it would be... Her exams are fair, and cover exactly what she says they will cover, no tricks. She also reviews EVERYTHING fairly well beforehand, and gives sample exams that are pretty close to the real thing. She likes to stand in-front of the board when she's writing though...

4.0
4.0
MATH0230
Oct 23, 2012

She's quite dull as a person but gets her point across. Must pay attention carefully during class and do lots of prac probs. exams were SUPER FAIR. even gave us a re-do exam for exam 2 cuz the avg was so bad.

2.0
5.0
MATH220
Nov 5, 2012

This professor is very mean, will scoff you if you answer something wrong, needs a hearing aide, and mutters and often got her examples wrong in my class. Calc isn't fun, and she makes it worse. She would also often come late to her own class as well.

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Apr 3, 2013

Awful. She runs through the material without taking time to really explain. She really never allows questions and couldn't even hear you if you wanted to ask one. Exams are hard, online homeworks are hard but the quizzes aren't too bad. STAY AWAY FROM THIS WOMAN

5.0
1.0
BUSINESSCALC
Oct 16, 2013

she is one of my fav professor at pitt. Her tests are really easy and well covered in class. I don't know why there's a lot of people don't like her. She does many exercises during class to help me memorize and understand the theories-- which helps me to do the problems on the tests a lot faster.

1.0
5.0
MATH120
Feb 5, 2014

I've never rated a professor on here before, but I had to rate her. Her test are extremely tricky and the lecture is practically useless. I know that calc is a hard subject, but she makes it way harder than it needs to be. I'm currently trying to transfer to another class with a different teacher. Don't take this class if you're at all weak in math

2.0
4.0
BUSINESSCALC
Sep 24, 2014

Never once opened the textbook. Attendance was somewhat mandatory- she occasionally took roll for extra credit. She was sort of willing to help but not particularly approachable. I found her tests easy after taking Honors Calc in high school. Her final was really tough and she did not really curve the class.

3.0
4.0
0120
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 24, 2014

I highly recommend that you do all the practice problems at the end of each section, get a lot of practice bc the material isn't easy, neither are the tests. She offer you a chance to do good. Say you get a 45% on your first exam if you score higher on the second you get the highest grade. That's her curve. Just note that the tests get harder

2.0
4.0
0120
Grade: B+
Dec 18, 2014

Arrington is not a good teacher. She can barely hear you and doesn't actually answer your questions. She takes off points on tests for no reason. The only reason I did well was because of my TA. Class is worthless except every once in a while she gives extra credit for showing up. If you have a background in calc, you'll be okay, but it's work.

1.0
5.0
120
May 5, 2015

My mind is blown as to how there could be such a bad teaching, non-research professor in existence. Maybe she knows the material, but she's proven to me in two classes that she can't teach whatever it is that she knows. She certainly can't answer questions in a coherent way. One word: "avoid."

1.0
5.0
MATH0120
Grade: A+
Jan 5, 2016

Okay so I did well (got an A+) but I was one of the only ones who did well. Test averages were all around 65, and she was terrible at explaining things. DO NOT TAKE HER FOR ANY CLASS if you want to pass. Most of my friends got Cs in her class for Business Calc this past semester, but I would NEVER take her again if I had the chance.

2.0
4.0
CALC0200
Grade: C
Feb 23, 2016

Doesn't answer questions. Will ignore you if you try to answer one of her questions. Insults the most common methods of working math problems.

2.0
4.0
MATH0200
Apr 12, 2016

Gives absolutely no help to students. Talks into the board. When she asks for answers she can't see if someone has their hand up. When she finally does see someone she can't hear their response. Lectures are unclear but she does somethings that aren't included in the book. Avoid.

1.0
4.0
MATH0200
Grade: B-
Apr 21, 2016

Dr. Arrington was easily the worst professor I've ever had. Attending her lectures made me more confused than when I skipped and taught myself the material- my TA is the only reason many people passed. Assigns homework & tests on material she hasn't taught yet. Avoid Arrington at all costs; I don't know how she still has a job honestly.

2.0
3.0
CALC0200
Grade: A-
Jun 21, 2016
Wouldn't take again

So she's not the best lecturer but her tests couldn't be any clearer. The test questions are basically just like the book problems so if you can do those and do the homework you'll ace the class. She really does try to teach you the best way she knows how and she gives lots of extra credit so you might as well go to class.

1.0
4.0
MATH0220
Grade: B
Dec 13, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Very intelligent woman, but this is the worst class I have taken at Pitt. Extremely tough grader, no constructive feedback, no notes in lecture, and very unclear about what she is expecting.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
4.0
MATH0120
Grade: B-
Mar 2, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Dr. Arrington can be nice when she wants to be but is impatient and short when people ask for further explanations. She speaks into the board and is oblivious to people who have questions. She is very hard of hearing and usually can't hear what people are asking. She is a harsh grader. Occasional extra credit offered. Plan on teaching yourself.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
1.0
3.0
CALC0120
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 18, 2017
Wouldn't take again

She never noticed when people have questions and when she does try to answer them she gives confusing feedback. She does not explain any work she does on the board and assumes everyone understands. Talks into the board. The TAs are better at teaching. She's so bad I started using my friend as a tutor because Arrington was just confusing.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
1.0
4.0
MATH0120
Grade: A
Dec 9, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Arrington is by far one of the worst teachers I've ever had. She is very smart but does not actually teach you and just expects that you'll understand the concepts. Her exams are pretty difficult with low averages, but that being said, if you are a student who can is willing to put in time and able to teach yourself then it is possible to do well.

Tough Grader
Tests are tough
3.0
1.0
MATH0220
Grade: A
Jan 5, 2018
Would take again

I have a very strong math background so it was easy for me to get an A and not even touch the textbook. However, I saw fellow students struggle a lot because she does not explain concepts very well. Sometimes she even confused me with what she was saying.

Skip class? You won't pass.
TEST HEAVY
Would take again
2.0
4.0
MATH0200
Grade: A
Jan 9, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Pr. Arrington is a tough cookie. At first I thought she was a sadist because she loves luring innocent first-year students with trap questions and humiliating them when they respond incorrectly. However, she actually does have a sense of humor. Get the book, go to class always and recitation sometimes, and then you're good.

Hilarious
Tests are tough
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
3.0
MATH0200
Apr 22, 2018
Wouldn't take again

She is a very educated woman who cannot teach. I do not know why she has not been fired yet. If you must take this class, try to take it with anyone else.

LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
3.0
MATH0200
Grade: B
Nov 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Dont do it. But if you have to: Attend every lecture and take extensive notes. Recitation is what taught and saved me. Quizzes in recitation! Don't skip it, she does teach. Very lecture heavy but tests arent too bad if you KNOW the material i.e. through reci and textbook. Tests are similar to in class problems and homework. Read book for more info.

Skip class? You won't pass.
LECTURE HEAVY
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

33%

Textbook Required

80%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 16 grades
Most common grades:
A (4)
B (4)
A+ (2)
Grade Distribution
A(6)B(6)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 19 reported grades
A: 4
B: 4
A+: 2
Not sure yet: 2
Common Tags
Tough Grader (3)
Skip class? You won't pass. (3)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (3)
TEST HEAVY (3)
Tests are tough (2)
LECTURE HEAVY (2)
Get ready to read (1)
Would take again (1)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.04 avg change
Mar
Oct
Dec
Jan
Apr
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

MATH040

5.0

(1)

MATH1900

4.0

(1)

MTH202

4.0

(1)

CALC1

3.0

(4)

CALCULUS

3.0

(1)
+50 more courses
Difficulty by Course

120

5.0

CALC3

5.0

CALC0220

5.0

CALC2

5.0

MAT120

5.0

Similar Professors