3.4

Elena Nicoladis

Psychology - University of Alberta

3.4
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
66%
Would Retake
91
Reviews
3.4
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
3.5
Helpful
3.3
Clarity

66%

Would Retake

91

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

34

4

16

3

16

2

17

1

8

What Students Say

Too many group projects

PSYCO323 - 1.0 rating

Does not give clear instructions for assignments and marks harshly - a lot of group work

PSYCO323 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

76%

Textbook Required

5%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 24 grades
Most common grades:
A (8)
A- (6)
A+ (4)
Grade Distribution
A(12)B(4)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(8)
Based on 28 reported grades
A: 8
A-: 6
A+: 4
Not sure yet: 4
Common Tags
Get ready to read (21)
Caring (11)
Group projects (9)
Participation matters (9)
GROUP PROJECTS (7)
Respected (6)
Skip class? You won't pass. (5)
Amazing lectures (5)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.10 avg change
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PSYCH104

5.0

(1)

PSYCO498

5.0

(1)

PSCYO498323

5.0

(1)

PSYCH341

5.0

(1)

PSYCO223P

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PSYCHO104

5.0

323

4.0

PSYCO357

4.0

PSYCP223

4.0

PSYCHO323

4.0

Reviews (91)
3.0
5.0
PSYCO104
Oct 20, 2003

Enthusiastic, but very tough exams! Lecture material does not correspond to textbook and exam.

5.0
2.0
PSYC323
Dec 6, 2003

Great prof!! Love her stories about her kids. Very helpful. Her notes are better than the text (which is so boring).

5.0
3.0
PSYCO104
Dec 7, 2003

..not I want her hot, but I love her hair. Very enthusiastic, helpful. It's kind of misleading because her exams are hard. The course is still easy, and she made it pretty fun. Lots of stories.

3.0
5.0
PSYCHO104
Dec 16, 2003

Notes were not helpful, tested greatly on textbook. Exams difficult

1.0
5.0
PSYCO104
Apr 7, 2004

Horrible prof!!! she seriously mis pronounces things, stumbles over words, gives pointless stories, notes that are virtually useless and causes a hatred of the course. i would never take a course she offered ever again.

5.0
2.0
PSYCH104
Apr 16, 2004

Sure, the tests were hard, but everyone did poorly so my 72% got me an A. The projects will also give EASY marks. The class is a joke, but it's fun and interesting. She really loves what she does, and you can do well on the exam if you just read the text.

3.0
4.0
PSYCO104
Oct 10, 2004

hard exams, her hair drives me nuts, notes don't really help, but lectures aren't bad. a little hard to listen to her though, she stumbles over words but shes very into what she does.

5.0
2.0
PSYCO498
Oct 14, 2004

Elena is super-nice and down to earth and does her best to help you out if you need it. If you actually do your work then you'll be fine. Give her a chance- she's a great lady.

3.0
5.0
104
Oct 26, 2004

No Comments

3.0
3.0
PSYCO104
Oct 30, 2004

Ok prof. I really couldn't stand the lectures though, quite pointless. She loves psychology, but she needs to understand that not everyone else does! more discussions than teaching. Exams r ok. the class avg was 65% - which she said was good! study txtbook, pay some attention, and do the projects!

5.0
2.0
104
Nov 29, 2004

She's very interesitng and entertaining, and quite clear. If she stumbles over a word it's not so bad that you can't figure out what she's talking about. I've never actually noticed her do this. She's a fabulous professor and I would definitely take another course from her.

2.0
2.0
PSYCO323
Dec 17, 2004

The class was a waste of time - everything was straight out of Psych 223. The lectures were boring and always based on her own research and the textbook sucks! Very difficult to understand - nothing is clear and everything had to be clarified. At least the exams are easy!

3.0
1.0
PSYCO104
Jan 2, 2005

Lectures were really pointless, got out of class 40 min early quite a bit (in an 80 min class) the class was SO easy. At times was interesting but mostly quite dull. Book was more interesting in my opinion, she is very enthusiastic, she's not all bad, just needs more useful lectures

3.0
4.0
323
Apr 16, 2005

The classes were pretty boring and the text that she chose to use had to be the most boring brutal piece of garbage i've ever HAD to read.

5.0
2.0
PSYC323
Apr 28, 2005

She is a very good prof. I'm surprised to read bad reviews. She teaches by relating cognitive development to real world examples (much better than just dry memorization of boring facts in a textbook). She does give a lot of assignments but it helps you to keep up and makes studying for exams easier

3.0
3.0
PSYCO323
Jun 14, 2005

I guess scatterbrained would about sum her up. The lectures seem disorganized and last minute.

5.0
3.0
PSCYO498323
Sep 4, 2005

She is a very nice lady, and she gets really excited about the material she teaches which is nice to see. Very approachable and personable.

5.0
3.0
PSYCO323
Jan 6, 2007

I'm surprised she doesn't have a higher rating. Obvious enthusiasm for her subject and reasonably well organized. Lots of interesting case studies mentioned in lecture, so it never felt dull. Tries to get to know all her students. Exams can be tough but always fair.

4.0
3.0
PSYCO323
Jan 7, 2007

If you go to her class and write down everything she says, you will do well. The text is a waste of money, but if you feel guilty read the summaries and you are good. Projects are dumb and time consuming but will pull your marks up, choose the video not the research project the marks were much higher with the video

2.0
2.0
PSYCH323
Jul 6, 2007

disorganized and rushed.

5.0
2.0
PSYCH341
Apr 17, 2008

she is one of the nicest profs i have ever had, she is completely fair in all of her grading and is willing to go to great lengths to help us

5.0
2.0
PSYCO323
Apr 19, 2008

She is one of the best profs I've had. She's extremely approachable and friendly, and a very fair marker.

5.0
4.0
PSYCO323
Apr 22, 2008

Comes off all sweet and nice--which i think she is...but her exams are killer. Can't stand when profs have a big end-of-the-year project AND still make u write a final exam--which she does. Not only that but her exams are mc, short answer, short essay (1 page), and long essay (1-2pages)..ALL IN ONE EXAM. She needs to calm down with all that.

2.0
4.0
PSYCO357
Apr 26, 2008

This professor seems to genuinely care about her students. However, she has very high expectations for grading in a 300 level course. She expects an average for a 300 level course to be at least 75% with a B- for average. Also you have to go to every lecture, since she does not post her notes. Only provides very useless outlines of lecture.

4.0
1.0
PSYCO323
Dec 4, 2010

Her class was the easiest 300 I've taken. There was a weekly quiz and the exams are long (MC, short answer and essay) but straight forward and easy. Very easy marker, quizzes were an easy 10% almost always gave full marks if you explained your answer. Definitely recommend this course with this prof for a GPA booster

5.0
3.0
PSYCO323
Dec 30, 2010

Shes a good proff but get ready to do a lot of work throughout the semester.

4.0
3.0
PSYC323
Apr 13, 2011

She is so crazy! Very enthusiastic about psychology. There's a huge project worth 30% that takes up a lot of time. Her tests are super hard. Her in class notes are very hard to follow. I wouldn't recommend her.

5.0
3.0
PSYCO323
Apr 20, 2011

WONDERFUL! I loved Elena and her class. Lots of peoples say she was disorganized, but everything made sense to me. Doesn't post her notes online so either attend often or have friends in the class and share. If you have a question ask her, she will answer it and she will answer it well. Highly recommend Elena AND this course. :)

3.0
5.0
PSYCO223
Sep 22, 2011

Where to begin.She has never taught 223 and I can tell why.Has NO notes and doesnt really give any notes in class either so u make ur own notes from the textbook.a quiz every class for every chapter.there are 20 chapters.so 2 chapters a week which is hefty. and quizzes aren't easy either.maybe the exams are easy, but ull have 2 get to them first

2.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Sep 29, 2011

It's her first time teaching this class, she has no notes or slides & all we do in class is have discussions. Group chats in a class of 300+ students doesn't work! You can't hear half of what the student say. Also listening to her say umm & ugh 35+ times in 5 minutes gets pretty distracting. It's a read the textbook & hope for the best type class.

3.0
3.0
PSYC223
Oct 6, 2011

She brings her preschooler to class when we're trying to write our midterm! The kid is talking, singing and calling for her mama. NOT FAIR! Lectures are pointless, no slides, no structure, we just chat in groups while she scratches her head a lot. She seems to see us all as a big experiment...how much we will tolerate amuses her.

2.0
5.0
PSYC223
Oct 17, 2011

This class destroyed my semester. Her biweekly quizzes meant reading 2 chapters a week. We put in a lot of effort and didn't benefit. Spent tons of time reading for quizzes that had very specific questions, and it took time away from focusing on other classes. She doesn't make notes, doesn't have structure, and brings her kid to class.

2.0
4.0
PSYCP223
Nov 4, 2011

It is obviously that she knows her stuff, but the way she teaches this course is like you are in two different courses. Usually what we discussed in class didn't really pertain to what we were learning in the text (and making our own notes on). Impossible to know what to study for exams. Which were crazy hard. Our class was more of an experiment.

2.0
3.0
PSYCO223
Dec 21, 2011

Elena was very friendly, but her class was very poor. Her teaching had very little to do with the text, and the chat groups were a waste of time. There was a lot of extra work, and I didn't feel like I actually learned that much about the subject.

1.0
5.0
PSYC223
Feb 12, 2012

If I could have answered zero for every option above, I would have. Terrible teaching ability. She did absolutely no prep for class, had no notes, and was very hard to understand. I will never take a class with her again. Ever.

4.0
3.0
PSYCO223
Mar 22, 2012

Bi weekly quizzes were helpful in understanding important material although did take a lot of time. Attendance not at all mandatory. Exams were difficult because they required random bits of textbook information.

4.0
4.0
PSYCO223
Apr 16, 2012

Challenging course- two quizzes and around 60-70 pages of reading per week. Tests are challenging and focus on minute details in the textbook. Lectures were disorganized and boring. Two papers are also required. Not recommended.

3.0
4.0
PSYCH223
Dec 1, 2012

First, the good: She definitely delves deeply into research pertaining the material learned, and is adamant about introducing us to the scientific aspects of the course. That being said, I hated the class. It felt unstructured. None of the lectures had anything to do with the material in the textbook. Lots of extra work, and frustrating exams.

4.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Dec 7, 2012

I Loved this class. Elena was so excited to teach this class and you could see that she has a passion for what she does. Chapter reading quizzes were helpful. There are many ways to boost you mark in this class with group discussions and 2 assignments. If you attend class and do the reading this class is an easy GPA booster.

2.0
4.0
PSYCO223
Dec 17, 2012

I was actually excited for this class, but it turned out to be the least favourite class I have ever taken. You basically have to teach yourself the material from the textbook and take an online quiz for each chapter, then you go to an unorganized lecture and listen to mostly irrelevant material. It was a lot of work., wouldn't recommend.

4.0
3.0
PSYC223
Jan 6, 2013

Enthusiastic prof but all her classes consisted of us critiquing citations from the book, and exams are very difficult make sure you know the questions from chapter tests cause they are the same ones on the midterms

3.0
3.0
PSYCO223
Oct 26, 2013

Very scatterbrained. Lectures aren't very relevant (we watched sesame street videos) and you will mostly be tested on textbook material. Discussion groups were a waste of time.

1.0
5.0
PSYCO223
Dec 2, 2013

Terrible prof who is more concerned with testing you on the "course material" than teaching concepts. Disorganized and inconsistent. Dont go to lecture, just read the book, better yet dont take this class. Written response questions are vague. MC questions are trivial and focus on the tiny details of stories in the book. I regret taking this class

4.0
2.0
PSYCH223
Dec 3, 2013

I like Elena as a person. She seems to be very quirky, smart and passionate about what she teaches. Despite this, her lectures sometimes felt off topic and unrelated to developmental psychology. Her exams are not too hard, but I would've preferred her to cover more of the textbook material in class.

2.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Dec 16, 2013

Her lectures were pretty much pointless. I don't know why I bothered showing up as nothing in class. I didn't really learn anything from her, and nothing from the textbook was covered even though we had to read three chapters a week. The class discussions and assignments were an absolute joke. AVOID!

5.0
2.0
PSYC223
Jan 7, 2014

When reading the reviews for Elena, I found them so far from the truth! I loved the set up of her course: 3 midterms, two simple assignments(one page double space review of a study), easy group work sessions that took up class time, and best of all no final!

3.0
3.0
PSYCH223
May 4, 2014

Boring course, and the Prof. Nicoladas LOVES Piaget more than any prof should. Literally, just study every thing Piaget and you'll ace it all. Papers and group work were simple, but midterms were brutal. Lots of tricky questions with more than one right answer. No final though, which was nice.

3.0
4.0
PSYCHO323
Grade: A+
Apr 19, 2015

No structure to her class, especially when it came to grading rubrics or lectures. No power points or notes on eClass, instead hand wrote her notes on the board. Biggest problem was her lack of rubrics for assignments, as the instructions were unclear, which led to confusion as to what we were being marked on. Wouldn't take her class again.

3.0
2.0
PSYCO323
Apr 24, 2015

Elena is very passionate, fun and quirky. Her classes are not really structured, more like a discussion. I know that's not for some, but I enjoyed it as it made the information clear and stick in my head. Big projects were lots of work but fun. Only thing I didn't like about the class was the lack of clear instructionsexpectations on assignments.

5.0
1.0
PSYCH323
Grade: A+
Jun 24, 2015

The best psychology prof I have ever had!

1.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Grade: B+
Jun 18, 2016
Wouldn't take again

One of the worst instructors as she simply doesn't teach the testable material in her useless lectures. Read the book, don't go to class. This prof has one of the highest enthusiasm to incompetency ratios I've encountered. Avoid.

4.0
3.0
PSYC223
Grade: A-
Nov 17, 2016
Would take again

Solid choice for a prof. Very kind and helpful. Exams are not too difficult. Very fair!

Caring
2.0
3.0
PSYCO223
Nov 28, 2016
Wouldn't take again

This prof used no textbook in this class, instead she used many articles (the majority being published 20 or more years ago) that were written in pretentious and academic language that results in you falling asleep in your chair while trying to read them. She also doesn't agree with what some of the articles say, so be prepared to be confused. BAD

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
GROUP PROJECTS
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
PSYC223
Dec 8, 2016
Wouldn't take again

She's very caring towards her students, and the test questions were easy for the lecture notes, but when questioned on the article it can be quite hard as the articles are somewhat difficult. The TA this year for her class was not good as she took forever to mark out assignments and then marked super hard, still havent gotten second one back yet.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Caring
4.0
2.0
PSYC223
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 10, 2016
Would take again

Loved her so much. She was so enthusiastic about the material and made it interesting. Her assignments weren't hard and were easy grade boosters. I thought she was pretty clear about what would be on the exams, and she didn't try to trick you. Definitely would recommend!

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
4.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Dec 15, 2016
Would take again

very enthusiastic and approachable, also really nice. will go and find relevant research to answer your questions, which i found admirable. articles instead of textbook; some are dry but overall interesting enough. word choices in exams sometimes bit weird but fair. TA is v. nice but slow marker. pretty easy - minimal effort can get you at least b+

Get ready to read
Caring
GROUP PROJECTS
1.0
4.0
PSYCO323
Feb 6, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Does not give clear instructions for assignments and marks harshly - a lot of group work. Would not recommend.

Tough Grader
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
GROUP PROJECTS
1.0
5.0
PSYCO323
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 3, 2017
Wouldn't take again

VERY unclear instructions for assignments and expects way too much for a 300-level class. Too many group projects. No structure to the class. I am considering dropping the course even though I am interested in child development because the prof is not good at all and makes me DREAD class.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
GROUP PROJECTS
1.0
3.0
PSYC223
Nov 11, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Midterm short answer questions are short and vague. If you don't have exactly what she wants you fail. She has extremely erratic lectures. You do an extreme amount of group work for 2% of your grade. Quizzes on every article you read for a total of 3%. Overall I would rather drop the class and retake it than continue on with her as the professor.

Tough Grader
GROUP PROJECTS
2.0
4.0
PSYCO223
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 12, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Honestly, she was awful. Knew her stuff, but her exams were based half on lectures and half on articles that took forever to read. Assignments were long, and useless. You're way better off taking this class with a different prof or even just going online and looking at articles, just as we did in class...

Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
2.0
4.0
PSYCO223
Dec 21, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Elena is a super nice person, just not the best prof. Instrustions for group work was vague and confusing. No textbook but you are required to read a lot of research papers. The lecture content was not what I expected for this course either. I would recommend taking this course with a different prof, wish I did.

Get ready to read
Caring
GROUP PROJECTS
2.0
2.0
PSYC223
Dec 22, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Elena is a really caring and knowledgeable prof but her lectures are really dry. She doesn't use textbook but makes you read really old research papers and there are group meetings which are complete waste of your time. Her exams and assignments are pretty straight forward if you study.

Gives good feedback
SO MANY PAPERS
GROUP PROJECTS
4.0
3.0
PSYC223
Grade: B
Dec 29, 2018
Would take again

There is no textbook for this class, so going to class is manatory if you want to pass. She gives a lot of information during lectures so make sure you are writing it down as most of the powerpoints are pretty simple. She tests pretty fair, and there is no final for this class just three mid terms that are not cumlative.

Skip class? You won't pass.
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
2.0
PSYCO223P
Grade: A
Jan 30, 2019
Would take again

I really enjoyed Elenas class, and she gave us so many opportunities to succeed: 2 easy assignments, 4 group discussions that help you prepare for SA questions in the exams, 3 midterms and no final, and easy online quizzes on the assigned article readings. Her exams were very fair and her lectures were easy to follow. She is also really kind!

Respected
SO MANY PAPERS
Hilarious
5.0
2.0
PSYC223
Grade: A+
Aug 23, 2019
Would take again

Dr. Nic organizes course so that the student has multiple opportunities to succeed from almost bare minimum effort and participation that is actually enjoyable and not difficult/ awkward. Subject matter is super interesting as she is very knowledgeable & pulls from many relevant studies to keep class entertaining. Super kind & encourages questions.

Respected
Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
1.0
4.0
PSYC223
Nov 2, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Extremely boring, each lecture is just her saying "ummm" and rambling, causing you to have learned nothing and have no clue what to study. Tested heavily on 20 page research articles that aren't gone over it class, which are also convoluted and lack definite answers. If you love arts psych, maybe this is for you. Otherwise, pick another prof PLEASE

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
PSYC223
Nov 7, 2019
Wouldn't take again

So far in this class is a struggle, she gives many articles that are 20 pages long and does not explain or go over the important material. Her written questions she wants a specific answer and even if what you write down is right well you're out of luck. TAKE A DIFFERENT PROF

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
3.0
PSYC223
Grade: B
Nov 29, 2019
Would take again

Lovely prof!! Lovely person. Take a course with Elena and get ready to think critically and learn a lot! Would absolutely recommend

Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
Caring
4.0
4.0
PSYC223
Grade: A-
Nov 29, 2019
Would take again

Couple assignments and the course was fine but her midterms are made of short answer and multiple choice and there are way too many readings. The readings are on tests and most of them are long and boring, there's about 13. But overall, no textbook which is good and she's generally a good teacher but get ready to read and she's a tough marker.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
So many papers
2.0
4.0
PSYCO223
Grade: B-
Dec 5, 2019
Wouldn't take again

2 assignments, 13 readings w/ 5 question quizzes, 4 group meetings w/ self evals, 3 non-cumulative midterms (no final). honestly, don't learn much in class and then on the midterms get tested on things you'd consider not important. makes an easy course super confusing but she's a nice person, just not the best teacher. also write everything she say

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Tough grader
5.0
3.0
PSYCH223
Dec 16, 2019
Would take again

Her syllabus seemed like there was a ton of work to do, but it really wasnt. The readings were never long and reading quizzes were an easy A. You only met with a group 4 times and it was like a review for the written part of the midterm. You cant just rely on her ppt because they dont have all the information on them. She was a great prof

Get ready to read
Group projects
Amazing lectures
5.0
2.0
PSYC223
Grade: A-
Jan 1, 2020
Would take again

13 assigned articles to read instead of textbook, 4 group meetings and 2 wrriten assignment- seemed very horrible yet if you attend the lecture and write down word to word what she says & read articles, you get an easy A. I never put an effort for this course and did minimal work, yet it was still fine. Elena def made lecture intersesting as well.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
5.0
4.0
PSYCH223
Jan 14, 2020
Would take again

Funny lectures, exams are 50% what she says in class. The other 50% are from assigned readings which are relatively easy, and an autobiography of your choice. I never even read the book and managed to get full marks. Group projects, you meet outside of class, often a nice break from regular lectures, and easy marks but i was assigned lazy partners

Respected
Get ready to read
Group projects
5.0
3.0
PSYC223
Grade: A
Jan 25, 2020
Would take again

Elena was an extremely inspiring and caring prof. She was always more than willing to support me after class ended or within her office hours. She always makes interesting connections to the real world and research. Class is very fair if you are actually willing to put in the work, as any class should be. Take her.

Accessible outside class
Participation matters
Inspirational
5.0
3.0
PSYCO223
Nov 18, 2020
Would take again

Elena has a lovely way of speaking that makes her lectures super engaging! Her course content and the studies that she makes you read are actually interesting and relevant, especially with respect to Indigenous issues and LGBTQ+ issues. The workload was not the most I've seen from a class but the deadlines are very firm.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Amazing lectures
4.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Dec 6, 2020
Would take again

Elena is excellent at explaining concepts and provides many examples to help you understand. Her lectures are vague and could use a tad more information. The course included many small tasks that comprised a good portion of your grade, which made it easier to get a high mark. My only complaint was that she tested too much on readings. Way too much!

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Grade: A
Dec 8, 2020
Would take again

Elena was one of the best profs I had this online semester. There is no textbook, just lectures and readings. Though there are a lot of readings, I found them much more digestible than textbooks. Her lectures were also very well done and straight to the point. She offers lots of opportunities for grade boosts too as assignments are fairly simple

Respected
Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Grade: A+
Dec 8, 2020
Would take again

Elena is a very approachable and kind-hearted professor. 223 in Fall 20 had 3 non-cumulative midterms, 2 papers, 13 academic paper readings, an autobiography reading, and 10 zoom group meetings. Her lectures were asynchronous and each was about 20 minutes long. Follow the recommended schedule on the syllabus for a fairly easy A.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
1.0
PSYCO223
Grade: A-
Dec 9, 2020
Would take again

Dr. Nicoladis was my fav prof this term. This was the easiest psyco course I've taken. Tests are extremely fair considering it's open book. Most assignments you can get full marks, or nearly full. Her lectures were Google Drive videos and usually around 20 minutes. Zoom group meetings is a nice interaction in this age of quarantine and isolation.

Respected
Get ready to read
Group projects
5.0
1.0
PSYC223
Grade: A-
Dec 9, 2020
Would take again

Elena is very kind, understanding and empathetic and this shows in her interactions with students, the structure of her course, as well how she communicates the content in her lectures. No textbook but some pretty boring papers, many small assignments, and lots of free participation marks. Explains concepts well- important to write what she says.

Participation matters
Caring
4.0
3.0
PSYCO223
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 14, 2020
Would take again

Elena is a solid prof, kind, gives good lectures, and is engaging. The course content is also really interesting. My only issue with the class was group discussions and question write-ups. There are also lots of assignments worth small amounts of marks, so just be ready to do lots of little things.

Lots of homework
Participation matters
Group projects
5.0
1.0
PSYCO223
Dec 18, 2020
Would take again

This has been by far my favourite class ever. If you put in work you will do well. But it also doesn't require an excessive amount of work. Lots of smaller assignments but they are fairly easy to complete. Take this class with her!!!!!!

Accessible outside class
Clear grading criteria
Amazing lectures
2.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Grade: A
Dec 19, 2020
Wouldn't take again

No textbook, just readings which are old and outdated. Weekly group meetings with group homework. Surface level teaching/info, often times doesn't even teach it, just wants you to infer the info yourself. Most info is self taught from readings. Missing a lot of the info that this course should be providing. Two writing assignments

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Group projects
5.0
3.0
PSYC223
Grade: A
Dec 20, 2020
Would take again

There were weekly group assignments as well as many small assignments to raise your mark. The midterms tested half the readings and half the lecture notes. The lecture notes were pre-recordedand very straightforward. Stay on top of the readings, lectures, and attend the weekly group meetings and you will be fine.

Participation matters
Group projects
Caring
5.0
3.0
PSYC223
Grade: B+
Dec 22, 2020
Would take again

For online classes it was a lot of work load. The midterms were open book and based on lecture and readings and weren't too hard. There was two assignments that were pretty easy. There is group meetings ever Wednesday and self evaluations for easy marks. There was a lot of discussion posts that you have to keep track of and was hard to remember

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Group projects
5.0
3.0
PYSCO223
Grade: A-
Jan 2, 2021
Would take again

She was a good prof, no textbook but a ton of articles to read!!

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Jan 4, 2021
Would take again

Probably my easiest class last semester! Lectures are short and the work load is manageable. Elena makes sure to get to the point and I believe she is pro-student, meaning that she really cares about her students' success. The assignments weren't too difficult and there were a lot of opportunities to improve your grade.

Group projects
4.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Grade: A
Feb 3, 2021
Would take again

I really enjoyed taking 223 with Dr. Nicoladis. She made her lectures short and sweet and assigned case studies to read instead of a textbook. Her class wasn't very hard but I still feel like I learned a lot.

Accessible outside class
Participation matters
Caring
5.0
3.0
PSYCO223
Grade: A
Mar 23, 2021
Would take again

I loved the way Elena taught psyco223. She had us read actual experiments, and encouraged us to think for ourselves to resolve questions, instead of saying this is what is right, this is the only answer. I loved the atmosphere of critical thinking that she created in the class!! 100% would take another course taught by her.

Get ready to read
5.0
2.0
PSYCO223
Grade: A
Apr 21, 2021
Would take again

One of my fav profs. You can tell she genuinely cares about her students and their wellbeing. Mondays we had an optional live question period and Wednesdays we had mandatory live group discussions. There were lots of opportunities to improve grades, and she was straight to the point.

Respected
Caring
EXTRA CREDIT
2.0
3.0
104
Grade: B-
Dec 4, 2024

I found that I was marked much harder by the professor than the TA's. I also found that the feedback I received was often "this sentence doesn't make sense," when it in fact did to others that have read the same document.

Tough grader
Group projects
Lecture heavy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

76%

Textbook Required

5%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 24 grades
Most common grades:
A (8)
A- (6)
A+ (4)
Grade Distribution
A(12)B(4)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(8)
Based on 28 reported grades
A: 8
A-: 6
A+: 4
Not sure yet: 4
Common Tags
Get ready to read (21)
Caring (11)
Group projects (9)
Participation matters (9)
GROUP PROJECTS (7)
Respected (6)
Skip class? You won't pass. (5)
Amazing lectures (5)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.10 avg change
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PSYCH104

5.0

(1)

PSYCO498

5.0

(1)

PSCYO498323

5.0

(1)

PSYCH341

5.0

(1)

PSYCO223P

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PSYCHO104

5.0

323

4.0

PSYCO357

4.0

PSYCP223

4.0

PSYCHO323

4.0

Similar Professors