3.7

Garrett Howard

Philosophy - University of West Florida

3.7
Quality
2.3
Difficulty
76%
Would Retake
85
Reviews
3.7
Quality
2.3
Difficulty
3.7
Helpful
3.7
Clarity

76%

Would Retake

85

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

32

4

24

3

15

2

6

1

8

What Students Say

He has no method for grading

PHI2103 - 1.0 rating

It's a super simple class

PHI2010 - 4.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

85%

Textbook Required

72%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 35 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (14)
A (10)
B+ (4)
Grade Distribution
A(24)B(2)C(1)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(8)
Based on 38 reported grades
A+: 14
A: 10
B+: 4
A-: 4
Common Tags
Participation matters (12)
Get ready to read (12)
Gives good feedback (10)
Clear grading criteria (10)
Graded by few things (7)
Tough grader (7)
So many papers (5)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (3)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.20 avg change
Apr
Aug
Mar
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

INTRORELIG

5.0

(1)

INTROREL

5.0

(1)

PHILART

5.0

(1)

MEDICALETHICS

5.0

(1)

EXISTENTIALISM

5.0

(1)
+19 more courses
Difficulty by Course

REL

4.0

LOGIC

4.0

EXISTENTIALISM

3.0

PHL2010

3.0

PHI2103

2.7

Reviews (85)
5.0
1.0
INTRORELIG
Jun 23, 2004

Awesome teacher, no tests or final exam!!! very easy A if you put in a little effort; or u can just settle for a B

2.0
3.0
REL2000
Jul 14, 2004

If you didn't agree with his views than yours were wrong.Also he dogged sororities and fraternities while in class.Since I'm in a sorority I found that inappropriate.Also he would bash certain religions which I thought was wrong since it was a rel class.

5.0
1.0
REL2000
Jul 14, 2004

no exams or test, who cares if your feeling got hurt, you got an A

1.0
3.0
REL2000
Jul 17, 2004

No Comments

5.0
1.0
INTROREL
Jul 18, 2004

Good teacher,only focused on some religions,NO TESTS!only papers (will proofread),easy A, a little biased (ok by me),dont sign up if you are easily offended by criticism of religions (i.e. your own), a lot of class disscussion and DAYS OFF

5.0
1.0
PHILART
Oct 24, 2004

He has opinions and discusses them in class. So what if you felt offended, it isn't grade school. There are people and ideas that you may not agree with. His classes are interesting and easy, and he is one of the nicest people at UWF. so what if he criticized your ideas. grow up.

4.0
4.0
REL
Nov 4, 2004

He was one of the most informed teachers I have had.

4.0
1.0
PHI2000
Nov 18, 2004

Howard is one of the best teachers, he loves his roll call so show up for every class. He has some funny stories, and despite what people say he doesn't 'dog' on anything but makes interesting points but covering all of the bases. A great class!

5.0
2.0
PHI
Dec 3, 2004

This guy totally owns it up! Funny and well informed in everything we discuss! I would definetely recommend this teacher! He is a little biased, but who isn't? Prepare for a fun class!

5.0
1.0
MEDICALETHICS
Jan 1, 2005

I loved his class. I thought he was hilarious, but very passionate about philosophy, and especially about life,which is a must in a class like Med. Ethics. I am not sure about the bias that others have mentioned though, as he seemed to be very open to a lot of the ideas of ny faith and its ethics.

3.0
1.0
PHI
Apr 22, 2005

You have to really like the subject Howard is teaching to enjoy him as a teacher. Otherwise he is just plain boring. He is very well informed though, so if he's teaching in your field, go for it. He is a little biased though, so don't take him if you don't like others telling you you're wrong.

3.0
2.0
PHI2000
Apr 30, 2005

i didn't understand what was going on in the class... the concepts were a little over my head. but our grade was based on a midterm paper, a final paper, and class attendance/participation so i made it through with a B, i think. that's pretty good for not understanding a word he said. easy class.

3.0
2.0
PHI
Grade: B+
Sep 2, 2005

If you are a republican or just a conservative, be prepared to be extremely insulted. The class is easy; its just hard to put up wih the garbage that spews from his mouth. I was called a sstupid redneck for wearing a "chevy" hat and stating that i am a republican.

5.0
3.0
EXISTENTIALISM
Sep 5, 2005

He was phenominal. If you are willing to learn something from him, you will. He's a giving professor with a true passion for knowledge. He also has a quarky sense of humor that keeps philosophy, as drab of a topic as it can be, from being too dry. Bare wit

5.0
2.0
ETHICS
Sep 23, 2005

Such a cool guy. Fun class. He is really smart i like a teacher who teaches.

2.0
4.0
LOGIC
Nov 9, 2005

I'll be blunt. Mr Howard has no teaching skills, is very boring, overcritical, and doesn't mind offending a few people. The only good thing was the way he pranced around class telling "funny jokes". He thought they were funny but everyone was laughing at him. So take this class if you need a good laugh at the expense of losing a good teacher.

3.0
2.0
PHI2010
May 23, 2006

Mr. Howard made the class a lot of fun. We had I think 5 quizzes, and I think 3 of them were open notes. Then we had a midterm and final paper, both which are graded very easily. Should be no reason to make anything below a B- in the class.

5.0
2.0
PHI
Jun 24, 2006

I had 5 classes with Mr. Howard. Don't miss roll and don't talk when he's talking - those are the most important rules. He is absolutely passionate about learning and is one of the nicest people you could ever meet. He is also one of the smartest! Put your own biases aside and take his classes to learn, pure and simple. Remember that in the ontolog

5.0
4.0
PHI3800
Mar 3, 2007

Knows his subject inside and out. Brilliant at delivery and explanations. Listen, take notes and do your assignments to make a worthy grade in this class. Is that a lot to expect from a college student? Howard is a professor you will never forget.

4.0
2.0
PHH3100
Nov 5, 2007

Mr. Howard is a very interesting cat. He knows a lot about philosophy. I took him for greek philosophy with little prior knowledge of the subject. He was over my head in most lectures, but if you take notes you'll do good. Only problem 3 grades. Attendance, midterm, and final. The exams are take home essays, but if u repeat the notes you'll get "A"

5.0
3.0
PHI2100
Nov 21, 2007

Not cery easy material, but he makes is interesting. He is pretty funny and tends to talk about movies alot. Made a B in the class. I would reccommend him

4.0
4.0
PHI2010
Aug 7, 2008

Interesting class. You most definitely have to read and there is a lot of discussion involved. Not too bad with the number of assignments he gives. I would definitely take more of his classes.

1.0
2.0
RELINTR
Sep 2, 2008

Howard taught my Intro to Religion course and all he did was teach his opinion all semester. He was one of the worst professors I have ever had throughout my time in college.

4.0
1.0
PHI2010
Mar 16, 2009

i have professor Howard for an online class and so far its easy, we just read the chapter, discuss it, and our exams are to write a 2 pg paper about that chapter on a topic of his choosing. so far i have made b's on all the exams. he seems to know a lot about the topic though.

3.0
3.0
PHI2010
May 23, 2009

If I could change one thing it would be to have actual discussion questions for students to answer on the discussion board. Howard's requirement was: "If you don't understand something after reading the chapter then post a question, if you do understand then answer other people's questions." I really hated the discussions in this class!

4.0
3.0
PHI2010
Aug 3, 2009

A lot of reading involved but it is refreshing to see a professor so interested in their craft. Interesting subject matter, and it involves A LOT of discussion. I loved it.

4.0
4.0
PHI2010
Dec 1, 2009

Philosophy online was an interesting class. I think it would have been more worthwhile if we did something else besides write a paper each week and do a discussion each week. It got old pretty quick, especially when he expected us to view things explicitly from his perspective...something that some would see as very counterproductive to philosophy.

4.0
1.0
PHI2010
Dec 10, 2009

He loves to talk about movies, so know some obscure ones, it makes him think your smart. He is an atheist so his views on religion and topics that could deal with religion are skewed towards an atheistic approach. He is extremely fun to talk to and he allows for everyone to input their own opinion.

5.0
1.0
ETHICETHI
Jan 26, 2010

One of the best teachers I have ever had. I do not understand some of the posts that states he is not open to others opinions. I found him to be very receptive to others view points. Not closed minded at all. Very tolerant intelligent teacher. Would highly recommed him. Alot of writing but his grading is fair. If you are intolerant dont take him.

5.0
1.0
PHI2603
Apr 6, 2010

Dr. Howard is a pretty good teacher. The only thing that I don't like is that he is completely and obviously biased against Christianity. I'm not saying this just because I am a Christian either. I did not really notice it until he made it very evident one class period. I was highly offended...

3.0
2.0
PHI2603
May 7, 2010

I was not a fan of his class. I am a chistian and I thought he was very offensive towards christians. However, the class was very easy.(we only had 2 essays the whole semsester)The lectures were very boring and attentence is mantatory. And is is HIGHLY againist cell phones in class!

4.0
1.0
PHI2603
Jul 8, 2010

He is the most arrogant teacher I have ever had. If you disagree with him, then you are wrong. But the class is still extremely interesting and he is an enthusiastic teacher. I absolutely loved it. It's super easy and you don't really have to read because he reviews it in class. I'm thinking about PHI as my minor now because of this class. :D

1.0
4.0
PHI2010
Sep 23, 2010

He gives 4 days to post to discussion boards on an online class with no flexability. You must post within the forst two days in order to recieve full credit. He closses the discussion on Fridays at noon giving the working person no time to do the work and does not respond to emails. I had to withdraw from his class which I have NEVER done.

2.0
3.0
PHI2010
Dec 15, 2010

Class was not hard, took it online. The class consists of discussions once a week and two papers (no final.) Make sure you do ALL the discussions,no make up.I missed 3 and it made my grade go from an A to C+. Not a very nice teacher, bit of a know it all and he talks to you as if you are a child. He doesnt seem to like technology in the slightes

4.0
3.0
PHI2010
Dec 11, 2011

This class was difficult for me because I do not enjoy reading...and this class is a whole lot of reading and quite bit of writing. You have a discussion post each week (min 50 words) and a mid-term and final paper (each 4 pages). He is a fair professor, but seems to have very liberal views that he likes to share. Overall, it was a good course.

4.0
1.0
PHI2010
Dec 12, 2011

Online class was not at all hard. Yes, you have to read and write a bit, but we are in college, Mr. Howard is not the most accessible or dynamic teacher, but he knows philosophy. Interesting discipline to study.

5.0
2.0
ETHICFALL
Dec 15, 2011

Great teacher no test at all just two papers one at mid term and finals attendance is worth 200 points so go and participate for 200 easy points and youll pass but i dont like the subject i just took cause it was required he very nice older guy you can talk all day and he give you power point of the lessons so use them to write your papers

3.0
3.0
PHL2010
Jul 25, 2012

Took the online into to Philosophy. Had to take the class was not interested in the class - still not interested in the class. Participate in the discussions fully, turn in your papers and don't be afraid to disagree with him. I did and still passed. Wasn't too fond of being called a molecular bigot though.

3.0
1.0
PHI3800
Dec 5, 2012

This was a very easy class. You write two papers, and have mandatory attendance, but that's it. He is very hypocritical and egotistical, though. Be prepared to be interrupted, and yelled out if you interrupt him. He will also ridiculously publicly humiliate anyone reading, drawing, texting, or doing anything other than listening to him.

3.0
2.0
1660PHI201020
Apr 11, 2013

Took the online class, it's fairly easy to get a good grade. Just keep an open mind. He respects your opinions unless it's closed-minded. The material is scattered and difficult to find at times, so take notes for the test.

4.0
2.0
PHI2010
Apr 22, 2013

Great professor. I took him for Intro to Philosophy and ended up receiving an A in the class. Go to class and participate because it's part of your grade. Very easy class but can be confusing at times. No actually exams or quizzes or hw, just two papers to write which are fairly easy as well. I recommend to take Howard for Intro to Philosophy.

3.0
2.0
PHI2603
Jun 25, 2013

The class structure was probably the most simple I've ever seen. One paper for your mid-term, one paper for your final. His lectures seem to take forever, but some of the content was interesting to think about. Be sure to take some notes, even though all the material is available online.

3.0
2.0
PHI2010
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Dec 1, 2013

He does not require the book, but instead assigns readings available through eLearning and movies. The class consists of weekly discussion posts and essay exams. Class is not too challenging if you want to take an easy general requirement. However, he is very unorganized in his online course, making it difficult to find anything.

4.0
3.0
PHI2010
Grade: A+
Dec 29, 2014

Really great professor. Lectures can drag on for a bit, but if you participate, you'll be fine. He is willing to help if you ask and make sure not to have any electronics in his classroom because he will flip. Papers are easy but overall, he is a great Professor.

5.0
1.0
PHI2010
Grade: A+
Apr 5, 2015

I enjoyed this class. Although some of the topics seemed a bit redundant some were inspirational. I think it is a great course for college students. Definitely a must take.

5.0
2.0
PHI2603
Jul 28, 2015

He is a very helpful teacher and will help you get through the course. The course is sort of hard if you aren't a philosophy major but if you read the material and the power points, do the discussion posts ON TIME, and submit essays ON TIME you will pass with an easy A. Also, he does not issue quizzes or tests. The 1-page essays are your tests!

1.0
5.0
PHI2103
Jan 26, 2016

He has no method for grading. You can clearly give him the correct answers, but he will mark them wrong anyway and deduct many points, just because he feels like it. If you ask him about it, you will be sorry because it will get worse for you. At UWF, don't complain either, staff lies to cover for each other. If you complain, you will regret it

3.0
1.0
PHI2603
Grade: A
Apr 15, 2016

The lectures can be kinda long, but sometimes he shows movies and he's just a cool teacher.

5.0
2.0
PHI2010
Grade: A
Aug 6, 2016
Would take again

Professor Howard basically grades you on your writing ability and comprehension of the subject matter... There were four essay exams and then a lot of discussion boards. He doesn't really care about the length of the writing, more so the content that shows you understand the subject.

5.0
2.0
PHI2010
Nov 3, 2016
Would take again

Mr. Howard was a great teacher and I'm taking him for Critical Thinking next semester. He doesn't do tests, but he does exam essays. Very nice, but make sure you attend class. Also he doesn't allow electronics in class and will call you out if you have your phone our and he wont start class if someone has a laptop out.

Gives good feedback
Skip class? You won't pass.
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
PHI2603
Grade: A
Nov 12, 2016
Would take again

My boy, Gary! His class is such a pleasure. If you're not afraid to really engage in class then you'll love it. I will say though, if you're gonna bring the hammer, you'd better bring the nails; don't start a debate you can't finish! I once watched him snatch a guy because he said dogs weren't people. He's a good time. You'll want to go to class.

Gives good feedback
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
1.0
PHI2010
Grade: A+
Nov 24, 2016
Would take again

Professor Howard can be everywhere at once with his lectures. The only work to do in class are discussion boards and essays for each chapter. It's a super simple class. Just make sure you don't plan on using tech in the classroom.

4.0
2.0
PHI2010
Grade: A-
Dec 7, 2017
Would take again

It was a pretty easy class, as long as you do your assignments. His tests are written essays and he likes to see your views on topics so don't be afraid to let your personality shine through.

Participation matters
SO MANY PAPERS
Tests? Not many
4.0
2.0
PHI2010
Grade: B+
Dec 12, 2017
Would take again

His online philosophy class is very easy. It consists of only a discussion post once a week and 3 essay exams. I will say however that I got 100's on all the posts and an A on all the exams but still ended with an 89 in the class for missing one discussion post. He doesn't give extra credit or an opportunity to makeup any work you missed

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
5.0
2.0
PHI2010
Grade: A
Apr 30, 2018
Would take again

Mr Howard absolutely loves to talk. He also enjoys having a conversation, though, it usually ends with him in a monologue. He'll also take concepts and give you a question to answer in the mind of a philosopher. On a few philosophical topics, he'll show movies to get the point across. 3 essay exams and participation is all he grades.

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
1.0
PHI3880
Nov 6, 2018
Would take again

I have taken him in the past and his lectures were a bit dry but he loves Philosophy of Film. Some parts can be a little boring to sit through but for the most part it's very interesting. We watch a lot of interesting movies. As long as you don't try to interrupt him, stay off your phone, and seem engaged you will do great! He's not a harsh grader.

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
2.0
PHI2103
Grade: A
Dec 1, 2018
Would take again

Best online professor Ive had! Responded to emails in a timely fashion, gave good feedback, and made sure instructions were clear. Even online you can tell hes a nice guy. A discussion post once a week and 10 problems assigned from the chapter. Hes not a tough grader so its really easy to make an A. Wish I could retake this class!

Gives good feedback
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
PHI2603
Grade: A+
Dec 1, 2019
Would take again

I loved this professor. The only grades he had were three exams which consisted of three essays each. No final, no pop quizzes, no assignments. Writing essays comes easy to me so this class was a breeze! It was hard to keep up with the lectures at first but I realized It was easier to listen to the lectures instead of actually take notes.

Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
5.0
2.0
PHI2010
Grade: A+
Dec 4, 2019
Would take again

Overall great professor and easy class! Textbook definitely NOT required so don't waste your money. Only grades off of 3 exams which consist of 3 really essays. Even gives students a chance for late work which is rare! Super approachable, very nice, loves what he does, genuinely good guy.

Graded by few things
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
PHI2603
Grade: A
Apr 28, 2020
Would take again

Easy to work with, treats you with respect and values the opinions of his students. We actually had a verbal disagreement during the semester and Mr. Howard still treated me with dignity and respect throughout the rest of the semester. It's hard to find professors like this. Great experience.

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Participation matters
5.0
2.0
PHI2100
Grade: A+
Aug 4, 2020
Would take again

Super easy class if you do the work. All I had to do was answer 10 questions at the end of the assigned chapters, and write a one page double spaced essay on the topic.

Graded by few things
Clear grading criteria
4.0
1.0
PHI2010
Grade: A+
Oct 29, 2020
Would take again

Easy class with only discussion boards and essays. However, beware of the essays since he likes to dock points for doing "the minimum length." His feedback is very vague and seems like he just copies and pastes it. As long as you submit anything and it more than the minimum length you'll get full points.

Participation matters
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
5.0
2.0
PHI2603
Grade: A+
Nov 11, 2020
Would take again

Very straightforward class and the professor is really nice. A discussion board every week and he does not grade harshly. Three "exams" that are 3 essays each. The exam prompts are given at the beginning of the year. Allows late exams with -25%. Learned a lot without feeling stressed out.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
PHI2103
Grade: A
Dec 17, 2020
Would take again

Super easy class. Weekly discussion posts and bi-weekly chapter exercises. Attendance is taken by posting/replying to discussion posts. No quizzes or exams, would recommend him! Answers emails quickly and provides necessary info required to get an A!

Participation matters
5.0
2.0
PHI2603
Grade: A+
May 5, 2021
Would take again

Very easy class, half of the class is discussion posts and the other half is three papers which are your exams. Theres no final exam for the class.

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
3.0
2.0
PHI2103
May 10, 2021
Would take again

Literally the easiest A you could possibly receive. However, I wish he would actually teach. I rarely received emails from him and I taught myself by reading the textbook. You legit just have to do discussion posts every week and chapter exercises that include a short paper every two weeks.

Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
PHI2013
Grade: A+
Dec 14, 2021
Would take again

Take this class if you want to add in an easy class to your semester. Weekly discussion posts and an exericse/2 page paper every other week. No final exam and there was no more graded content after Thanksgiving break. He was very clear on the organization of the class--make sure to read the syllabus @ the beginning of the course!

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
5.0
2.0
PHI3800
Grade: A
Jan 7, 2022
Would take again

I took professor Howard several years back for Philosophy of Film and still think about his class. His class was the foundation of my screenwriting career and I use his lecture notes often as a reference when I am working on a script.

Accessible outside class
Inspirational
Amazing lectures
4.0
3.0
1660PHI201020
Grade: B
May 3, 2022
Would take again

Weekly discussions and reading and three very heavily weighted papers. Make sure to post every week and oh my lanta, DO NOT forget to submit your essays or you won't pass. Grading is explained very clearly. Philosophy is one of my least favorite subjects but Professor Howard was not bad at all.

Clear grading criteria
Graded by few things
1.0
2.0
PHI2103
Grade: B+
Sep 24, 2022

Personally, my experience with this professor was negative. I found that I was discouraged from asking questions or asking for clarification on assignments. Little to no guidance was given on discussion prompts, grading criteria, and expectations for assignments. The class material is easy, but I would choose to take it with a different professor.

4.0
4.0
PHI2603
Grade: A+
Oct 18, 2022
Would take again

I don't know how I did so well in this class, as philosophy is like reading hieroglyphics tbh. Professor Howard assigns a LOT of papers, however they don't have to be lengthy to be sufficient. My advice if you take his class is to tell yourself everything in the lessons is easy to understand and it will reflect as such in your essays. I recommend.

So many papers
3.0
3.0
PHI2010
Grade: B+
Oct 19, 2022

Discussion posts weekly that require in-depth reading of material that sounds like gibberish. Then there are 3 essay exams where he gets mad if you are not far above the minimum word count. What is the point of a word count if it needs to be at least 100 extra words than the word count????????????

Tough grader
Get ready to read
So many papers
1.0
5.0
PHI2010
Nov 4, 2022
Wouldn't take again

If you dont know what philosophy is dont take it online, his lectures power points doesnt really answer anything for the essay exams. There are discussions post weekly for attendance, you get points off if it not satisfied to him, there are 3 essays totals he grade very tough and there 2 prompts and 4 pages total for each essay, the book sucks.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Online Savvy
2.0
3.0
PHI2010
Grade: A-
Nov 21, 2022

You have a discussion post every week, which isnt bad, but the reading is extensive. You also have heavily weighted exams that consist of 2 essays, with a 2 page minimum each. But, if you only write the minimum amount, he will make a comment about it, basically shaming you. He's a tough grader on the exams, and is very vague about how to do better.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
So many papers
4.0
4.0
PHI2010
Grade: A
Nov 28, 2022

Professor Howard is a great teacher. The only problem I had is the way he grades the essay exams. The exams consists of two essays in one and he does not like it whenever you meet the minimum page requirement. On top of that, the exams are HEAVILY weighted. I would not take him again, just the class.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
1.0
5.0
PHI2603
Grade: A+
Apr 12, 2023

This is the most difficult course and professor I have taken during my three years at UWF. He has unclear expectations and is an inconsistent grader. One assignment will earn you an A and the next will earn you a D. I would never take one of his courses again. I ended up with an A because I worked extra hard & did well on a few assignments. Avoid!

Tough grader
Lots of homework
So many papers
4.0
3.0
PHI2103
Grade: C+
Apr 21, 2023
Would take again

Professor Howard is an excellent instructor, however be aware if you take his online Critical Thinking course he only allows submissions up to Friday rather than after the weekend. Other than that he provides great feedback and is clear in his grading requirements.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
4.0
3.0
PHI2103
Grade: A+
Apr 26, 2023

For Critical Thinking class, it was easy. You submit a discussion board every week and complete a chapter assignment once every two weeks. The only hard thing was writing the essay for the chapter assignments in your own words. But the essay is only 1 page, so his critical thinking class is not hard at all.

Tough grader
5.0
3.0
PHI2103
Grade: A-
Aug 4, 2024
Would take again

Professor Howard is awesome. He expects a lot from you and will give feedback to help you give the best you can for the class. I wish I had found out about him earlier; I would have taken more classes with him.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
1.0
5.0
PHI2103
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Aug 8, 2024

Awful professor. He would not work with me on my missed assignments (I was at a Funeral). Instead I was given more work and forced to submit excused absence forms which the school said they are not allowed to do during the first week of school. I had to drop class in order to not be penalized for this.

5.0
2.0
PHI2103
Grade: A
Aug 9, 2024
Would take again

Plain and simple assignments. As long as you participate in on-line discussions and do the assigned reading/answer questions from the reading, you'll be fine. Of note, if a one-page essay is assigned, do 20%-50% more just to be safe. Less than a page (and by that, I mean 1-2 sentences short of a full page) won't cut it.

Participation matters
2.0
2.0
PHI2103
Grade: A-
Mar 24, 2025

Legit just taught myself by reading the textbook which is required and a 1 page paper every other week, as well as discussion board every week. Only thing is that there was some textbook trouble and he was no help at all, no extension or communication.

Get ready to read
So many papers
2.0
1.0
PHI2010
Grade: B
Apr 26, 2025
Would take again

Very easy class. But you should NEVER forget to do the discussion boards. I missed two and got an 82. And he will never reopen anything, if you lost any deadline you will not be able to do it again, and if you try to make an appointment with him he will avoid and ask you to send an email instead.

Tough grader
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
3.0
4.0
PHI3880
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 13, 2025
Would take again

philosophy of film can feel convoluted and confusingly abstract. i do think he gives great feedback and i appreciate how much he appreciates my responses, but he is not super hands-on. it's your responsibility to immerse yourself with the material, otherwise you're cooked. and do not miss those deadlines like i did

Get ready to read
Gives good feedback
Graded by few things
5.0
2.0
PHI2103
Grade: A+
Dec 4, 2025
Would take again

I had him for critical thinking, quite honestly, he was refreshing. He gave back our grades for our discussion posts and genuinely took time to acknowledge the work I was putting into the class. Great guy.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Gives good feedback
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

85%

Textbook Required

72%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 35 grades
Most common grades:
A+ (14)
A (10)
B+ (4)
Grade Distribution
A(24)B(2)C(1)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(8)
Based on 38 reported grades
A+: 14
A: 10
B+: 4
A-: 4
Common Tags
Participation matters (12)
Get ready to read (12)
Gives good feedback (10)
Clear grading criteria (10)
Graded by few things (7)
Tough grader (7)
So many papers (5)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (3)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.20 avg change
Apr
Aug
Mar
Apr
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

INTRORELIG

5.0

(1)

INTROREL

5.0

(1)

PHILART

5.0

(1)

MEDICALETHICS

5.0

(1)

EXISTENTIALISM

5.0

(1)
+19 more courses
Difficulty by Course

REL

4.0

LOGIC

4.0

EXISTENTIALISM

3.0

PHL2010

3.0

PHI2103

2.7

Similar Professors