3.0

Gerald Korenowski

Chemistry - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

3.0
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
41%
Would Retake
109
Reviews
3.0
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
3.1
Helpful
3.0
Clarity

41%

Would Retake

109

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

23

4

22

3

34

2

15

1

15

What Students Say

Korenowski is funny and nice but his lectures aren't great

CHEM1100 - 3.0 rating

He's lively, funny, and down to earth

CHEM1100 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

75%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 22 grades
Most common grades:
A (12)
B (4)
B- (2)
Grade Distribution
A(13)B(6)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 25 reported grades
A: 12
B: 4
B-: 2
Not_Sure_Yet: 1
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (6)
Lots of homework (5)
Lecture heavy (5)
Respected (4)
Caring (3)
Test heavy (3)
EXTRA CREDIT (2)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.13 avg change
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Jan
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

1500

5.0

(1)

CHEM01

5.0

(1)

CHEMMAT1

4.0

(2)

ENGR1300

4.0

(3)

CHEMISTRY1300

4.0

(1)
+18 more courses
Difficulty by Course

CHEMPRINCIPALS

5.0

INTROTOCHEM

4.0

CHEM1310

4.0

CHEMISTRY1300

4.0

CHEMISTRY1100

4.0

Reviews (109)
5.0
2.0
CHEM1500
Mar 27, 2003

definitely the better chem mat I lecturer, very approachable

2.0
2.0
CHEM1500
Apr 24, 2003

No Comments

5.0
3.0
CHEM1500
Apr 29, 2003

Very good Lecturer. Concise Clear

4.0
2.0
CHEM1500
May 11, 2003

good professor, but the course was retardedb

5.0
2.0
1500
Sep 24, 2003

No Comments

3.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Oct 8, 2003

Too many anecdotes and info he mixes up and then doesn't bother to clarify. I can forgive lecture mistakes as long as u make sure the class knows what the real info is but this is a weakness of his.

5.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Dec 14, 2003

He's very nice and makes lectures interesting but his tests can be exceptionally cruel and unusual. For such a difficult course, he does a great job.

5.0
3.0
CHEM1300
Dec 21, 2003

Excellent lecturer. Very approachable after class, always open to questions. He cares about his students and enjoys teaching.

5.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Jan 5, 2004

Very, very hard course. Way too much material for one semester. Good teacher though.

1.0
1.0
CHEM1500
Feb 27, 2004

Boring, inane, and totally unhelpful. Had him for chem Mat 1. He would bring his kids to class, not know what he was teaching about, and not care about the students. Worse chem class I've ever had.

1.0
5.0
CHEM1300
Mar 16, 2004

Loser! Worst Teacher Ever.

5.0
1.0
CHEMMAT1
Mar 25, 2004

I had him for Chem mat 1 and thought he was very good. Better than the other Chem mat 1 lecturer.

1.0
3.0
CHEM1300
Mar 25, 2004

HORRIBLE, thats all I have to say

4.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Apr 21, 2004

Difficult course... far too much information for an introductory chem class for mostly non-chem majors. However, he is a decent guy who teaches the material pretty well. Very available and fair.

3.0
1.0
CHEMMAT1
Jun 22, 2004

Easiest class I've ever taken. Even though their is alot of material covered in every exam, they were all doable and straightforward. Easy A.

3.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Oct 14, 2004

I'd rather read the book than go to lecture.

5.0
3.0
ENGR1300
Oct 20, 2004

Chem mat I is not a hard course at all because it's mostly chemistry from high school plus some new stuff from chemistry AP. Prof Korenowski is a great lecturer, much better than other chem mat I professor. And the exams and fianl are not hard at all.

3.0
3.0
CHEM1300
Oct 22, 2004

This class covers way too much info. for an intro. chem. class for people who are not chem. majors. Be careful on exams. The first one is cake, but don't get comfortable. The second exam will kill you. READ THE BOOK. He doesn't necessarily teach everything on the exam to both sections.

4.0
5.0
CHEM1300
Oct 26, 2004

ALOT OF MATERIAL ON EXAMS! Great person. The curriculum should be shortened...too much info...not his fault. He teaches well. Go to his office hours and you will do fine!

2.0
5.0
CHEM1300
Oct 28, 2004

After a year I still want to go into his office and break things. Worst professor EVER.

3.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Oct 30, 2004

Great person knows his stuff BUT goes way too quick and needs to elaborate. It feels that he thinks everyone already knows what hes talking about.

3.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Nov 2, 2004

Too much info for an inroductory chem course, and it seems like he thinks that everyone in the class already has a Ph.D. in chem

2.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Nov 9, 2004

sux balls, horrible teacher. cracks horrible jokes

3.0
4.0
INTROTOCHEM
Nov 9, 2004

This guy is way too fast! The Course is too advanced to be called a intro course. Very tuff if your highschool chem class was as bad as mine.The guy thinks the student know as much as him.

3.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Nov 11, 2004

Nice guy with some good humor, but teaching is too fast and over my head, even though I had High School Chem Honors. Too big of a curriculum with tests being pretty difficult to most. Many of the kids were lost, even though some kids did really well. Very high and low grades on tests.

2.0
5.0
CHEMPRINCIPLES
Nov 13, 2004

I hate him. Way too fast. Too much information. Tests are impossible. My test average is 42% after getting A's in high school. Do the lab reports and homework (if you can figure it out) and you should still be able to pass. I hope I can.

5.0
5.0
CHEMPRINCIPLES
Nov 16, 2004

Indeed this class has alot of material, but Dr. K. is the man. He is trying his hardest to teach and that's what counts. He did not create the course so he should not be blamed for all the hard work. Overall, he is a clear lecturer and great man!

4.0
3.0
ENGR1300
Nov 19, 2004

For those of you below who are taking the time to write a review, maybe you should be using that time wisely and studying for whatever is to come. The material is not that difficult, though there is a lot, so take off the diapers and go study, just have to review the material and pound it in.

1.0
5.0
CHEM1300
Nov 22, 2004

No Comments

3.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Dec 6, 2004

Very nice guy but moves through material extremely fast and assumes that students know much more than they do. If you didn't take AP Chem 3 times in high school you could be screwed. Tests range from managable to impossible without warning. Only savior is final.

1.0
5.0
CHEM1300
Dec 11, 2004

he sucks

2.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Dec 17, 2004

Class was hard and unclear. Simple material presented in such an unclear fashion that it was awful. Too much material for too little time. Good guy though, just totally slaughtered every kid with the test material and awful grades at the end of the year.

5.0
3.0
CHEMPRINCIPLES
Dec 22, 2004

Easy class IF you study. An 85 is the lowest A. Very easy to get that if you put your mind to it. As for Korenowski, very helpful whenever I needed it. Overall a great guy. Good sense of humor too!

3.0
3.0
CHEM1300
Dec 24, 2004

He's a great guy and all, and he's funny, and he obviously knows his stuff... but his way of getting it across is a little muddier than it has to be. I learned more in chem principles by just having a friend reteach it to me. As for the class, it's not hard as long as you put a TINY bit of effort in

3.0
1.0
ENGR1300
Jan 5, 2005

No Comments

3.0
4.0
CHEM1310
Jan 12, 2005

He spent fifteen minutes of lecture talking about random nonsense, and the rest of lecture was not clear at all.

5.0
3.0
CHEMPRINCIPLES
Feb 4, 2005

Lectures were informative and enjoyable. Knew his stuff and even blew stuff up in front of everybody once in a while. I especially enjoyed his anti-DeBeers rants midway through the semester.

1.0
3.0
CHEMPRINCIPLES
Feb 5, 2005

Awful lecturer, very disorganized. He would confuse himself when explaining anything; he was often late or he wasted lecture time talking about his kids or PRS receivers. His exams contained lots of errors, his grading on partial credit was draconian, and he generally sucks. SUCKS.

1.0
1.0
CHEMPRINCIPLES
May 3, 2005

Useless teacher. Class is easy so its not a big deal. Online assignments are junk. Back tests are all that are needed.

3.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Jun 30, 2005

I didn't have a good chem background so I found this class tough. He has good intentions but his exams are brutal. The final was easy though, so I managed a B.

4.0
1.0
CHEMPRINCIPLES
Aug 24, 2005

This class is really easy. It's basically a review of high school chemistry. Korenowski's lectures are pretty straight forward, and he talks alot about the online quizzing thing, so that takes up a lot of time.

4.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Sep 22, 2005

Said I couldn't do logarithms in front of the whole class. Not me specifically, but after we submitted an answer with our faulty RF transmitters, we heard that "59 people in class had better learn how to do logs." Heck, I can calculate logs of NEGATIVE numbers! (They're complex.) Questions we answer in class are often quite ambiguous.

4.0
4.0
CHEMISTRY1300
Sep 29, 2005

The exams are difficult, but the lectures are animated and amusing.

1.0
4.0
CHEMPRINCIPLES
Oct 8, 2005

He's very hard to follow and wastes a lot of time during classes

1.0
4.0
CHEMISTRY1100
Oct 25, 2005

Talks way too fast, and doesn't explain equations to understand them. Always late for class and never explained a test that 1/2 of the entire class failed - and the average was a 58%. Overall, a horribe teacher, but since he's the only one, theres nothing to do!

2.0
5.0
CHEMPRINCIPALS
Nov 3, 2005

THIS CLASS SUCKS THA BIG ONE!

5.0
3.0
CHEM1
Dec 7, 2005

Makes time available to help out students

5.0
2.0
CHEM1300
Grade: A+
Dec 13, 2005

I found him to be really clear. His lectures are well laid out, so that he goes in a logical order.

4.0
2.0
CHEM1300
Dec 18, 2005

I hated him, until we switched professors and i realized id taken him forgranted.... he is a pretty good lecturer, even though chem 1300-1100 sucks.... his tests are pretty fair, MEMORIZE THE CLICKER QUESTIONS!!!! easy points!

3.0
3.0
CHEM1300
Dec 19, 2005

At first I did not like this professor... that was until Gillies took over, then I missed him! Not too bad at teaching and his tests were reasonable. He really wanted students to do well.

3.0
4.0
CHEM1300
Dec 21, 2005

He isn't that bad as long as you pay attention. His tests are difficult, but study clicker questions and you'll be fine. Trust me you may hate him at first, then Gillies takes over and you miss him.

3.0
4.0
CHEM101
Jan 19, 2006

clear and helpful on an individual basis but goes quickly through difficult material in class. clicker questions rule all, learn those and youll pass.

4.0
3.0
CHEM1300
Jan 26, 2006

Final questions are taken directly from previous tests, and most multiple choice questions on tests are taken from clicker questions, so start memorizing. A breeze compared to Gillies.

4.0
2.0
CHEM1100
Apr 26, 2006

good teacher, maybe not the best but didn't do a bad job, if you take notes and pay attention you'll do well

4.0
3.0
CHEM1300
Jun 30, 2006

The class has a lot of work, but it is fair and gives you an Indication of what it will be like in RPI

2.0
4.0
CHEM1
Oct 12, 2006

Very unclear teacher! Doesn't stay on topic, wastes lecture time then gives tests with material we haven't seen.

4.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Oct 30, 2006

Dr. Korenowski may seem a little disorganized at first, but if you concentrate hard on what he says, he will teach you everything very well. Tests are only hard if you do not do the homework. If you have trouble with online homework, he will spend as much time as it takes to help you. Approach this guy when you need help: he is kind and easy going.

1.0
3.0
CHEM1
Nov 10, 2006

i honestly don't pay attention to him

2.0
5.0
CHEM1100
Nov 14, 2006

No Comments

1.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Nov 21, 2006

He is very unclear and not much can be taken out of lecture, no matter how much you pay attention. He is too brilliant a man to be teaching such an elementary course.

3.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Dec 5, 2006

He seems to be a nice person to get along with, and in the beginning the class seemed interesting, but he just cannot possibly figure out how to keep everybody's attention, and the Lab TAs are forced to pick up the slack. Everybody in the back half of the lecture hall completely zones out. Keep an ear out for his tangents -- they're pretty funny.

4.0
2.0
CHEM1100
Jan 6, 2007

Overall decent professor. Though it was sometimes easy to zone out during his lectures, he nonetheless kept it light-hearted and often cracked some jokes (some less funny than others). If you listened to his lectures and did all the work, you got the A like I did. Nice guy outside of class too; he is the professor that colleges need more of.

4.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Jan 18, 2007

He will teach you what you need to know, but it's up to you to understand it. Do the homework to reinforce and reteach concepts to yourself.

5.0
1.0
CHEM1100
Feb 13, 2007

Great teacher but you must read the text book. If you listen he teaches everything you will see on the test. Classes are huge so sit in the front if you can't stay awake. Funny stories

5.0
2.0
CHEM1100
Aug 24, 2007

Great Prof! Easy to listen to, and informative

2.0
4.0
CHEMCHEM
Nov 30, 2007

He seems like a smart guy but he doesn't know how to teach. I come to class just to get credit for attendance but I do other work in class and read class notes from other teachers online later.

5.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Mar 19, 2008

Easy to understand, goes off on tangents quite a bit. Easy to forget everything you learned. Works through almost every problem he shows, sometimes while you are supposed to answer it with the clicker

2.0
1.0
CHEM1100
Mar 23, 2008

He goes off on way too many tangents! You can't tell what to filter out because everything seems unimportant. I suggest reading the textbook over listening to him. Barely anyone in class listened to him. People were either playing games on their laptop, doing hw for other classes, or sleeping. The only reason to come to class was for iclicker.

5.0
2.0
CHEM1100
Mar 27, 2008

Easy A if you study. And thank god he goes off on tangents, chem isn't that interesting.

3.0
1.0
EQCHEM
Dec 8, 2008

I had him for Eq Chem and quantitative analysis, not the clearest professor I've had, but he is wicked nice

5.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Mar 29, 2010

Good Professor, Very helpful if you need it

3.0
2.0
CHEM1100
Dec 27, 2010

He goes off on tangents and i just couldn't follow what he said. I felt like he made things more complicated than they are and taught things we didnt need to know. after a few lectures i stopped even trying to pay attention, i just read the book and did the homework on my own and was able to learn the material that way.

3.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Feb 3, 2011

He does not present the material in an organized fashion. He starts off with examples but never explains thee concepts behind them. He goes off on tangents most of the time. Honestly, I gave up on learning anything after the first couple of lectures. I looked at Alvaro's notes and everything became crystal clear.

2.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Sep 23, 2011

At least half of every class is him ranting about some completely unrelated tangent.

2.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Oct 14, 2011

It is absolutely impossible to learn from him. He just rambles on and doesn't actually explain anything he just adds more information that ends up confusing you even more...

3.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Nov 14, 2011

He's lively, funny, and down to earth. However, his ability to convey not-so basic Chemistry over a period of 80 minutes leaves a little to be desired. It's not hard to follow with him, but in the end you realize what you've learned isn't so clear, and it's hard to get a big picture.

5.0
2.0
CHEM01
Nov 16, 2011

He is a very positive and friendly professor, and is always looking for ways to help his students. Chem requires out of class studying, but all the test questions are available through class or outside work. He likes to include stories in his lectures, and think about how anything in life relates to chem. Overall great Professor, always friendly!

3.0
3.0
CHEM1010
Dec 5, 2011

If you enjoy sifting through what appear to be the scribblings of a homeless schizophrenic the night before a test, this is the guy for you!

3.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Jan 1, 2012

Goes off on too many random tangents, and is very hard to glean any useful information from lecture. His tests are difficult but manageable.

3.0
3.0
CHEM1
Nov 13, 2012

Hard to figure out the important parts of his lecture. A very boring lecturer and goes on tangents. Not a great teacher for students who need clear-cut facts for retention. Exams are only 25 multiple choice questions.

4.0
1.0
CHEM2400
Dec 16, 2014

I had Prof. Korenoski for Chem 1 and Physical Chemistry. He was MUCH better in Pchem than he was for Chem 1. I didn't think he went off on as many tangents as other reviewers. Pchem is a whole nother story; it's his field. He did a good job at explaining things, was very clear about exam problems, and made a hard subject more relatable.

4.0
3.0
CHEM2440
Grade: A-
Nov 23, 2015

I really enjoyed Dr. Korenowski's class. He's very smart and is always willing to help during office hours. He tells you exactly what to study for the exam, so as long as you're prepared you'll do well. I would definitely take another class of his.

4.0
2.0
CHEM4420
Grade: A
Mar 1, 2017
Would take again

His lectures were interesting, but totally optional. He loves Physical Chemistry and is passionate about it during his lectures. The tests were open-book, cheating was easy, and the questions were from book problems. Make sure to get the text book solution manual. Overall, easy class.

Respected
Clear grading criteria
Caring
4.0
2.0
CHEM4420
Grade: A
May 9, 2017
Would take again

Super nice, gives lots of extra credit. Tests are open book, and you can regrade them for up to half credit back. Get the solution manual for the book.

Clear grading criteria
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
3.0
CHEM4410
Oct 9, 2017
Would take again

Dr. Korenowski tries his hardest to make sure everyone understands the material and gets the best grade they can possibly get. He's extremely helpful if you go to his office hours, and takes your feedback very seriously. Great guy and great teacher.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
Clear grading criteria
Caring
3.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Grade: B
Nov 6, 2017
Wouldn't take again

He is overall a pretty good professor, but he always goes off topic with his lecture and falls behind with other classes taught by a different professor. This is a problem when you are in a lab section with students who have already learned the material you haven't.

4.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Nov 16, 2017
Would take again

All around good professor. Is passionate in subject and really wants students to understand the concepts.

Respected
Clear grading criteria
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
2.0
CHEM4420
Grade: A
Jul 1, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Very generous with homework points. Often cancels class due to weather. Lectures are recorded, class attendance is not mandatory. TA can be hard to find. Tests similar to homework and back exams.

Caring
5.0
1.0
CHEM1010
Grade: A
Oct 30, 2018
Would take again

Completely reads off the slides and teaches a lot of unnecessary information but he's a great dude if you actually ask him stuff and he brought candy for Halloween so. It's what you make of it.

4.0
1.0
CHEM1100
Grade: B-
Dec 5, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He is a really good person, and has a good sense of humor. He definitely knows his stuff, but for me, personally, he went very fast in lecture and it didn't benefit me going to lecture as much as it did just reading the textbook.

Respected
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Grade: A
Dec 16, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Korenowski is funny and nice but his lectures aren't great. I just show up to class for the participation credit and teach the stuff to myself by reading the powerpoints later or watching Dr. Ma's lecture.

Hilarious
2.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Oct 25, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Lectures consist entirely of him reading off the slides, which would be fine if he wasn't blatantly using other professors' slides. It's apparent within lecture that he is viewing the slides for the first time. His genial attitude does not make up for what he lacks as a professor.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Nov 14, 2019
Would take again

Great professor, only complaint was the structure of labs. If you show up to most lectures and answer the online questions you will get a good grade. Loved all of his stories

Gives good feedback
Respected
Participation matters
3.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Grade: A
Oct 23, 2021
Wouldn't take again

He seems like a really great guy. I think he would be an awesome parent to have (I know that's weird, but that's beside the point...) ANYWAYS, we are always the most behind in lectures and he gets a bit off-topic, which makes homework (which has the same deadline in all classes), much harder to complete as well as lab quizzes.

Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Grade: A
Dec 19, 2021
Wouldn't take again

I would not recommend anyone take professor Korenowski for Chem 1. He absolutely cannot teach and does not explain anything. He just goes through concepts and says oh yeah this is easy, flies through an example and moves on. He never covers the material in depth enough for the exams. Take Dr. Ma if you can, but he's not great either

2.0
4.0
CHEM1010
Grade: A
Jan 13, 2022
Wouldn't take again

Having Korenowski as a lecturer makes a tough class harder, he's often behind the other professors and the tests themselves are very difficult.

Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
CHEM1100
Grade: Incomplete
Oct 8, 2022

The professor brags about his students needing to spend 60 hours a week just on his class. The class average has most people at a D or lower just from the first exam. He just reads of the slides and does barely a few problems during lectures. You're better off reading the textbook. Dr. Ma and Tysoe are way better are at teaching the course.

Tough grader
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
CHEM1100
Oct 10, 2022

As other students have already mentioned, he just parrots the information on the slides. He is also behind schedule on the content in his lectures making homework as well as review for exams that much harder as you must teach yourself what he is supposed to teach.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
2.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Grade: A
Nov 30, 2022

The professor is frequently behind the other two chemistry professors, meaning that the already decently difficult tests are made even harder by having less time to review material. Homework load is also very high compared to most other first year classes, and much of it is busy work. It is easiest to simply read through slides during lecture.

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
4.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Grade: A
Dec 21, 2022
Would take again

Korenowski doesn't progress through slides as fast as they were already designed to. This might matter if your lab is right after his lecture, meaning info you need for the post-lab hasn't been covered yet. Other than that, I enjoyed his small tangents. Just in general though, this class WILL be a lot of work no matter which lecturer you get.

Beware of pop quizzes
Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Grade: Rather not say
Dec 16, 2023
Would take again

Choose Dr. Ma for Chemistry 1100 if possible. Dr. Korenowski is not a bad lecturer, but Dr. Ma makes the exams for every Chem 1100 section, so you are better off being in his class. Dr. K hosts very helpful review sessions for exams and often gives away questions. The class is very difficult, but he does try to make it easier for his students.

Lecture heavy
Test heavy
Accessible outside class
3.0
3.0
CHEM1010
Grade: B
Dec 19, 2023
Would take again

Take Ma if you can, Karnowski is okay, I like his personality but sometimes he can be behind in the material.

Lots of homework
3.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Grade: A
Jan 6, 2024

Dr. Korenowski is a very smart person, but he is also a professor that is uninvolved with teaching. He reads off the slides that someone else gives him, and it's obvious that he is seeing the slides for the first time in class. Additionally, he will sometimes not show up to his office hours. However, Chem 1100 offers a lot of other great resources.

EXTRA CREDIT
Graded by few things
1.0
4.0
Chem1120
Grade: D
Feb 5, 2024

Was consistently behind the other professors by at least a week.

3.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Grade: B-
Mar 28, 2024

He tends to go on random tangents leaving us behind on the material. There were a couple times I had to teach myself material to get through the homework because we hadn't reached it in class. He's very willing to help students.

3.0
3.0
CHEM1100
Grade: B
Jan 10, 2025
Would take again

pretty average RPI teacher. wasnt too great but definitely wasnt bad, definitely better than other alternatives (Tysoe)

Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
3.0
4.0
CHEM1100
Grade: B
Jan 17, 2025

The class is challenging, but Professor Korenowski tries to make it more manageable. While he can get sidetracked, his review sessions are very helpful. unstuck study was a great study tool alongside the textbook.

5.0
2.0
Chem1120
Grade: A
Sep 24, 2025
Would take again

He was usually behind in lectures, but he always caught up by the time an exam came around. If you stay after class of go to his office hours he is genuine and tries his best to explain everything (he also gives out answers to HW and exam questions all the time)

Gives good feedback
Hilarious
3.0
5.0
CHEM4410
Grade: C+
Sep 29, 2025

Tests too hard and flows through lectures too fast and they're a little hard to understand.

Test heavy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

75%

Textbook Required

25%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 22 grades
Most common grades:
A (12)
B (4)
B- (2)
Grade Distribution
A(13)B(6)C(1)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 25 reported grades
A: 12
B: 4
B-: 2
Not_Sure_Yet: 1
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (6)
Lots of homework (5)
Lecture heavy (5)
Respected (4)
Caring (3)
Test heavy (3)
EXTRA CREDIT (2)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (2)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.13 avg change
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Jan
Sep
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

1500

5.0

(1)

CHEM01

5.0

(1)

CHEMMAT1

4.0

(2)

ENGR1300

4.0

(3)

CHEMISTRY1300

4.0

(1)
+18 more courses
Difficulty by Course

CHEMPRINCIPALS

5.0

INTROTOCHEM

4.0

CHEM1310

4.0

CHEMISTRY1300

4.0

CHEMISTRY1100

4.0

Similar Professors