3.4

Geraldine Akman

Geography - McGill University

3.4
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
89
Reviews
3.4
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
3.1
Helpful
3.6
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

89

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

29

4

25

3

12

2

17

1

6

What Students Say

Akman is a terrible professor

GEOG216 - 2.0 rating

Akman is a rude, unpleasant, and unhelpful teacher

GEOG216 - 2.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

59% confidence
Based on 3 grades
Most common grades:
A (1)
A+ (1)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 3 reported grades
A: 1
A+: 1
B: 1
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.27 avg change
Jan
Mar
Apr
Dec
Jan
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

GEOG

5.0

(1)

GEOGANDIDS

5.0

(1)

GEOGRAPHY

5.0

(1)

GEO216302410

5.0

(1)

GEO410

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

GEOG

4.0

GEO216410

4.0

GEOG216410

4.0

GEOGSECT

4.0

GEO

3.0

Reviews (89)
5.0
2.0
GEOG216
Oct 24, 2002

Get this woman a cooking show! Very Christing CUshing

5.0
1.0
GEOG216
Nov 7, 2002

The easiest teacher at McGill. Gave me marks for effot (I'm serious)

4.0
3.0
GEOG216
Dec 5, 2002

Teaching method similar to 3rd grade: memorize bullets on board, spit info back

5.0
3.0
GEOG216
Dec 12, 2002

Very nice, but too much memorization required

3.0
4.0
GEOG216
Dec 22, 2002

One must memorize content verbatim; don't put things into your own words!

2.0
3.0
GEOG216
Feb 17, 2003

really boring and the question weight in the tests were retarded.

2.0
2.0
GEO
Apr 15, 2003

Quite left of center but without the sophistication

1.0
1.0
GEOG210
Apr 25, 2003

she's ridiculous

5.0
3.0
GEOG410
Sep 28, 2003

She's a little hard to get used to at the start, and doesn't have much respect for lowly students' opinions, but she gets friendlier. She's also really interesting and knowledgeable. Accept her methods and you will learn tons.

4.0
3.0
GEOG216
Oct 16, 2003

A funny funny lady. Was an awesome prof who made things clear but memorization work is key. Make sure you stay for her opinions on Haitian rum - and her perm makes it worth while as well.

5.0
2.0
GEOG216
Nov 7, 2003

She's a really good teacher. There's a lot of memorization involved but she explains everything well. I really like her class.

2.0
4.0
GEOG216
Nov 10, 2003

Boring classes. A nasty mid-term test.

4.0
3.0
GEOG216
Nov 13, 2003

sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo hot

5.0
4.0
GEOG
Nov 18, 2003

Took 400-level geog of developing countries, and I learned things I've never forgotten. I thought her lectures and readings were fascinating, if you like the topic.

4.0
1.0
GEOG216
Dec 1, 2003

Somewhat boring; whole class consists of taking down notes she projects and then memorizing them; but at least she's pretty friendly, knowledgeable, straightforward

4.0
2.0
GEOG216
Dec 7, 2003

Her lectures are very informative and clear; if you go to class and take notes you will do well on the exams, but she is SO not willing to answer questions in class and is actually pretty rude to students who try to ask her questions.

4.0
2.0
GEOG216
Dec 8, 2003

She is a very good, clear teacher; it's just unfortunate the material is so boring. However, it is an easy mark if you memorize all the class notes (word for word), because they are all that the test covers. No creativity required, just time for studying.

5.0
2.0
GEOG216
Dec 9, 2003

I like her classes.. I think the materials are interesting and she presented them clearly. No memorization needed if you understand them.. Hopefully the exam is like that..

5.0
2.0
GEO216
Dec 12, 2003

good teacher - interesting insights - i like that she presents all the views.

2.0
2.0
GEOG216
Dec 13, 2003

Although I found the class easy, I could not stand this professor. She never answered anyone's questions, she'd laugh at herself over stupid things, I just found her annoying beyond belief.

4.0
3.0
GEOG216
Dec 13, 2003

tough. but fair.

5.0
3.0
GEOG216
Dec 13, 2003

Thank you.

5.0
1.0
GEOG216
Dec 13, 2003

i love this course, but tricky exam.

5.0
2.0
GEO216
Jan 4, 2004

She's great! Funny, interesting, amusing, and intelligent. Don't try and get her off track though, you'll regret it.

2.0
3.0
GEOG410
Apr 23, 2004

Bad professor. Is rude to anyone who disagrees with her. Allows for no interpretation even though its a 400-level course. Only likes regurgitation. Won't make time for students outside of class.

2.0
4.0
GEO
Apr 30, 2004

The most annoyingly evil woman ever. If you question something in class she is quite rude. She is biased with work once she knows you. Be prepared to have everything re-evaluated. Waste of time.

5.0
1.0
GEOG216
Sep 8, 2004

She looks like the cat lady in Jeepers Creepers, but is very interesting. I think she should teach the class alone. Doc Mok is interesting and all, but usually gives these weird analogies and stories.

5.0
2.0
GEOG216
Sep 26, 2004

We have our first test tom, but just to go back on the previous statement i made a while ago, she is still a very nice lady, unlike the private benjamin leut look, which is so entertaining to watch every MWF

2.0
3.0
GEOG216
Oct 27, 2004

Not impressed at all! If you know how to memorize all HER notes, and don't interpret on your own, you'll do very well. She left no room for personal engagement and truthfully, I thought her insight was limited!

4.0
2.0
GEOG216
Oct 29, 2004

I entered this class with no interest whatsoever but I found it surprisingly engaging. It's easy as long as you attend all the lectures, as 90% of the tests are based on class-notes. She's very helpful if you go to her office and ask questions on your personal time!

2.0
4.0
GEOG216
Oct 29, 2004

Nice and friendly professor, BUT the key to success in her classes is to agree with HER point of view on the issues in question. She's NOT open to new concepts nor opposing perspectives, even if you have reputable sources to back them up. Therefore, if you do things HER WAY...you'll get your A-.

3.0
4.0
GEOG216
Oct 29, 2004

Average professor who teaches her classes the same way year after year. Unfortunetly, if you need help, her Teaching Assistants (T.A.) are NOT of much help...not only do they have limited office hours, they are inconsistent with their grading (Fall 2004 semester).

5.0
1.0
GEO216
Oct 31, 2004

Great teacher. Always willing to help if you need it. I definitely recommend this class

5.0
4.0
GEOG309
Nov 1, 2004

Always has time for her students and has interesting stats and videos to show. As for tests, as I long as you show up for class and take down her class notes (and study / memorize them of course!), I'd doubt that you'll fail this class...or any other courses that she teaches. :o)

2.0
4.0
GEOG216
Nov 5, 2004

Very poor professor. Ridiculously hard marker as well. Do not take this class, Mok is no better, and the 930 time slot doesnt make things any better. USE WEBCT for gods sake too. Notes are useful, but hard to comprehend because you are scribbling notes while she tells important things.

5.0
3.0
GEOG210
Nov 14, 2004

Amazing teacher, ver devoted to her students, very fair (but challenging) exams. Lots of interesting stories and insights. I wish all my yeachers where like her

3.0
2.0
GEOG216
Dec 4, 2004

Never has time to answer questions in class. Divide and rule! No understanding necessary to pass her exams : just memorize EVERY overhead and you'll get it. Is that learning? CAn't listen to what she explains since you're busy copying the overheads that she won't put on webCT. Awful class.

1.0
3.0
GEO216
Dec 19, 2004

It is best to stay at home an d read the economiste as it seems to be her bible. She does not rely on any other sources. Very conservative and not open minded enough to realize there might be something else than her own opinion. Harsh marking

4.0
4.0
GEOG216
Jan 3, 2005

You ask for a clarification of what a word means, and she says come to her after class. Proves it's not about the learning but about the notes for her. Which is depressing, but she's still a nice person. If you REALLY cared, you WOULD go to her office hours. Decent prof. Mean grading...

5.0
4.0
INTD497
Jan 14, 2005

Akman is one of the few professors at McGill who actualy challenges students - even if that means arguing something she dosn't agree with. She is also the only professor I have had at McGill who intensly cares about the students. If you want to learn something take her class.

4.0
4.0
GEO216410
Mar 25, 2005

very CARING and sweet professor. Remembers her students, each ones' specific issues or inquiries.Gives great importance to her students.If she doesnt answer a question, it's cuz she had given the answer some minutes before while you were picking your nose.Its good she dont waste time!class is 50 min

4.0
3.0
GEOG410
Mar 30, 2005

Prof. Akman is great at teaching this class. The material is intersting and she is obviously passionate about the topic. I have had her for GEOG 216 and 309. She is better at teaching the upper level classes because they are smaller and she gets to know her students. Fair marker.

4.0
4.0
GEOG410
Apr 12, 2005

Half of me loves her, the other half wants to punch her in the face. You really need to take the class to understand. Fascinating material, and she is super nice, but she always manages to find a way to confuse an easy assignment and make sure you have no idea how to get a good mark.

5.0
3.0
GEOGANDIDS
Apr 17, 2005

Dr. Akman is one of a kind. She truly wants her students to learn the most they can, and is not interested in simply 'keeping up' McGill's image. She is always available for students with needs, and is willing to discuss anything during office hours. Very fair, and super cool!

1.0
4.0
GEOG216410
Apr 25, 2005

Akman makes me want to gouge my eyes out. Her classes will make you die on the inside. She is not nice. Nor is she a good teacher. I would rather have an anvil dropped on me than take another class with her. Boo.

3.0
3.0
GEOG216
Apr 26, 2005

Not the friendliest, but not a witch. I had absolutely no real interest in the class to begin with, but she didn't kill it for me. My biggest complaint is the marking - it seemed a little off to me. This was one of the most boring classes I've ever taken.

1.0
3.0
GEOG410
Grade: A
Apr 27, 2005

Fill your IDS 400-level class quota some other way unless you're some kind of masochist

4.0
2.0
GEOG302
Grade: A+
Jun 20, 2005

I think everyone who took this class with professor akman will agree it went really well. Great, easy to follow information, good communication between students and teacher, and very relaxed. I suppose the only problem would be that we all did too well.

2.0
2.0
INTD497
Jun 21, 2005

Very easy class for a 400 hundred level. Akman does nothing but complain about how busy she is. Is very clear about who she likes and dislikes. Not a nice person, mentally unstable.

5.0
1.0
GEOGRAPHY
Sep 2, 2005

Not the best professor but her tests are easy! Just do really well on her assignments and follow the guidelines to the nearest detail and you will get your A!

3.0
3.0
GEO216
Nov 16, 2005

She is a good teacher. Her notes are very precise and clear. The readings are very boring however. Also, this year she is co-teaching and both profs do not have the same tecahing technique which can be very confusing!

4.0
2.0
GEOG216
Grade: B
Dec 12, 2005

most of her course pack readings are only supplimentary. if you want to get a good mark.. make sure to attend all her lectures, which is simply to copy down her overhead notes.

2.0
3.0
GEOGCANADIAN
Dec 29, 2005

WORST TESTS EVER. Based on memorization of her notes! Does not test how the students knowlege of the concepts and their ability to apply them. Rather it is high school tests. How many points can you remember! Nice Lady, but her tests are plain out STUPID. And who can present a clear oral over 2 minutes!!! Could have done a lot more with the course!

3.0
3.0
GEOG216
Dec 30, 2005

Very nice, optimistic and always willing to help... so she says. But the most obvious things to do, that would benefit the most number of students the greatest way, like posting her notes on web-ct, or even listening to student's questions during exams, she volontarily refuses to do. In my opinion, she's a 2-face.

3.0
1.0
GEOG309
Dec 30, 2005

tests and assignments are fairly easy. Teacher has 2-sides - plays an act of being caring and concerned in class, but when students come up with their concerns she gets nasty. Would not even answer questions during an exam without getting angered. But course load is fair, she gives us clear notes to take, and assignments are actually fun

5.0
2.0
GEOG216
Jan 7, 2006

She's a very sweet person, and teaches in a very clear manner. A lot of people complain about how she doesn't put the notes up on WebCT, but it's not that bad; she gives you plenty of time to write them down. And besides, it's a good way to encourage people to actually come to class. Overall a good prof.

4.0
2.0
GEOG216
Jan 9, 2006

Tests are based on her overheads so attend lectures to copy them down. However you would ok is you just read the course pack and look at other people notes. This class would have been fine if not for the other prof, Deslaurier.

5.0
1.0
GEO216
Mar 6, 2006

really nice prof just study her notes and you'll do fine and must do some of the readings...

5.0
2.0
GEO216302410
Mar 22, 2006

Awesome Prof. Go to class and copy down exactly what she puts up on the overhead and you'll be money. Dont even have to worry about the readings and she will do whatever she can to make sure you get the best mark possible. I would DEFINITELY take her classes

4.0
1.0
GEOG302410
Apr 25, 2006

She is not a very good teacher (pure regurgitation for tests and papers). Despite initial appearances, she is condescending and full of herself. It seems beyong her comprehension that students could actually come to their own logical and insightful conclusions without her guidance.

5.0
3.0
GEOG302
May 15, 2006

She's really nice and makes class really interesting. She makes a course that could be really dull fun. Her notes are clear and easy to follow. She gives many case studies so that you can understand better and actually see the application of the abstract concepts. She gives you lots of studying tips and is always ready to help.

3.0
1.0
GEOG309
Nov 18, 2006

If you want to enroll in the boringest class ever, sign up for an Akman class. She'd be better suited to teach Grade 7 Geography than at a university level. And while all you have to do do get a good grade is study the in-class notes, she is so closed to discussion, the class is really rather frustrating.

1.0
5.0
GEOG216
Dec 18, 2006

this course, although has been known as a "bird course" for many years, is perhaps one of hard electives at mcgill. Akman seldom provides satisfactory answers to students' questions after class (70% of the time she dismisses questions or gives very ambiguous answers).

3.0
5.0
GEO216
Jan 2, 2007

Hard grader!!

5.0
3.0
GEOG216
Jan 11, 2007

She is a much better professor than professor Breau her co-lecturer. He essentially makes the class very difficult to follow while she is clear and simplifies everything to an understandable level.

5.0
2.0
GEOG410
May 23, 2007

Awesome prof! So helpful, she REALLY goes the extra mile. I've never taken a class that actually turned my perception of the subject on its head. Professor Akman really cares about her students' success. I definitely reccomend taking a class from her!

4.0
4.0
GEOGSECT
Jul 11, 2007

She's a great lecturer. Tough but fair. Lectures are very clear. If you read the articles and take notes you will do very well on the tests.

4.0
1.0
GEOG216
Nov 26, 2007

While never having actually spoken to Prof. Akman, I can say one thing for sure--easiest class I've taken at McGill. Go to class, copy slides, spend a few hours memorizing slides. Super easy exams.

2.0
3.0
GEOG410
May 8, 2008

Terrible, awful professor. I cannot say enough. Disrespectful, condescending (like other commenters have said, will not tolerate alternative opinions). She refuses to use WebCT.

2.0
3.0
GEOG216
Dec 1, 2008

She has earned the title 'Slackman' in our circle of friends. In review sessions she has been known to answer questions with "look over your notes" or "If you were paying attention..."the point of review sessions is to go over material that is UNCLEAR:by simply telling students to review the material that was initially unclear is REDUNDANT

4.0
2.0
GEOG216
Dec 11, 2008

Very friendly disposition. It's as if a kindergarten teacher were teaching at a University level. Very warm and caring. As a teacher, she is about on par for an intro level class. Spends a considerable time going over very basic topics, but she is fairly engaging and a pleasure to listen to. Recommended.

3.0
2.0
GEOG216
Jan 6, 2009

The class wasn't hard, but she did her best to be unhelpful. She was unpleasant whenever questioned and made up statistics. Her co-lecturer Breau was much better.

4.0
4.0
GEOG210
Feb 16, 2009

This class seems easy but the average was a B-; the exams are ridiculously nit picky. My grades were all over the place, ranging from a C+ to an A (in terms of exam results) and this class was pretty boring. If you like memorizing many useless facts, this is the class for you! Waste of time - do not take it unless you have to.

2.0
3.0
GEOG216
Dec 2, 2009

Akman is a terrible professor! Several times she gave us conflicting information, or that was just false! When questioned on her sources, she was unable to provide any, leading me to believe that she ballparks #s to incl. on her slides, which are possibly the only interest in this class. Won't accept other credible sources of info on exams/in class

3.0
4.0
GEOG309
Dec 9, 2009

Prof. Akman SEEMS nice...until you get to know her. She shows up on the first day talking about how her course is so easy, the tests are simple, no final- everything sounds great. THEN..she turns into the terrible person she is. Marks RIDICULOUSLY hard, not willing to help students...and you will not get the A! Do yourself a favor and STAY AWAY!!

5.0
3.0
GEOG302
Jun 1, 2010

I don't understand why people are calling her a bad teacher, she's great. Easy and fair exams, an engaging classroom full of discussion, and always willing to answer questions and help. She doesn't use WEBCT, but she's right in saying it makes students come to class, take notes, and learn. I got an A, and anyone else can if they go to every class.

4.0
4.0
GEOG302
Sep 6, 2010

Opinions for Prof. Akman seem to be all over the place.This is because it all depends on which class you attend.The higher level classes she teaches will be a much better experience than say, 216.It's true that you'll be disappointed when it comes to getting assessment results. Still,she makes it clear what must be done to get an A, which isnt easy

2.0
4.0
GEOG216
Oct 20, 2010

Great class when breau teaches it. Akman is not very interesting and makes class somewhat boring. As a visual learner she makes class disadvantaged towards you because her use of schematics, graphs, etc. is limited to her and a powerpoint. VERY uninvolved as a student! She frequently references her experience dealing with "drugs" while in the "war"

4.0
1.0
GEOG216
Dec 15, 2010

Prof Akam is a tough cookie. Her topics are SO interesting, and it takes her some time to give you that knowlege-base in order to continue to more specific topics. She is rather impatient when students question her statements/research/theories, and will readily debate them openly during class. But she is a fair grader and an adorable person.

4.0
2.0
GEOG309
Apr 1, 2011

One of the easiest classes at Mcgill.. I did it as an elective and got a high grade. Only 3 midterms which are pretty easy, one 3min oral presentation and one 1 page paper. She speaks slowly, has powerpoints are main points from the textbook (you need the textbook). Lectures not recorded. Take this for easy grade!

2.0
2.0
GEOG216
Jul 29, 2011

Akman is a rude, unpleasant, and unhelpful teacher. She reads straight from her slides and offers no arguments in favor of her material. When I attended office hours to get clarification on a quiz she referred me to the readings with no further explanation, assuming (incorrectly) that I had not previously read it. Memorize slides for an A.

5.0
2.0
GEO216
Jan 3, 2012

Most information that is tested is provided in class but the readings really help make sense of the notes given. If you have a real interest in the material presented take advantage of office hours to have a chat with Prof Akman, she is an incredible woman that has worked all over the world and has much knowledge to share.

3.0
3.0
GEOG216
Mar 26, 2012

The lectures were okay, but nothing too intriguing. At times, Akman was really kind and friendly... at others, she was quite unfriendly, making it slightly uncomfortable for students asking questions or commenting in class. Lectures follow the slides quite closely, so are fairly clear, but quite dull.

2.0
3.0
GEOG216
Apr 21, 2012

Not a very helpful professor. She made no effort to go over past midterms. She clearly made a mistake in one of the multiple choice and stubbornly refused to correct it, or at least take out the questions out, when most of the students got it wrong. Class was a bit interesting but most of the info can be gotten straight from the course pack.

5.0
5.0
GEOG216
Dec 9, 2012

I just love her! She is VERY CLEAR, she speaks SLOWLY, always happen to see you in her office. BUT her tests are kind of tricky...

4.0
2.0
GEOG219
Jan 7, 2013

I rather enjoyed Dr. Akman. She spoke clearly and slowly and her slides were well organized and succinct. GEOG 219 is an interesting course and you will learn a lot (despite the leftward lean). It is not hard to get an A if you memorize the slides and do the readings; the tests are tricky but fair (especially with the bonus on the final)

1.0
3.0
GEOG410
Apr 2, 2013

She treats you like you are 5th grade. You memorize the reader and spit it back out. The readings are not relevant (maybe 10 yrs ago). if you try to expand on the ideas in the readings, it is clear she is only able to repeat the text. Don't even bother trying to question her opinion. She is always right and doesn't even care to listen or engage.

4.0
2.0
GEOG216
Apr 5, 2013

Professor Akman is experienced and knowledgeable, but she can be occasionally downright rude to students who ask questions in class or seek assistance during office hours. Upon asking a question in office hours on a test, she took 5 minutes to find the answer buried in a reading and couldn't offer any further explanation or clarification.

5.0
2.0
GEO410
Apr 9, 2013

I really enjoyed this class. If you are unclear about any of the assignments she will gladly sit down during office hours and help you out! Her slides are very clear, but she does not post them on mycourses so it's somewhat necessary to go to class. The readings are all in the coursepack and they're straightforward and not very long.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

59% confidence
Based on 3 grades
Most common grades:
A (1)
A+ (1)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 3 reported grades
A: 1
A+: 1
B: 1
Rating Trend

Declining

-0.27 avg change
Jan
Mar
Apr
Dec
Jan
Apr
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

GEOG

5.0

(1)

GEOGANDIDS

5.0

(1)

GEOGRAPHY

5.0

(1)

GEO216302410

5.0

(1)

GEO410

5.0

(1)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

GEOG

4.0

GEO216410

4.0

GEOG216410

4.0

GEOGSECT

4.0

GEO

3.0

Similar Professors