2.9

Gregory Jerkiewicz

Chemistry - Queen's University at Kingston

2.9
Quality
3.5
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
112
Reviews
2.9
Quality
3.5
Difficulty
3.1
Helpful
2.7
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

112

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
112 total ratings

5

31

4

18

3

16

2

23

1

24

What Students Say

funny guy, wants his students to do well, too bad he isn't very easy to understand

CHEM112 - 3.0 rating

Great teacher that really cares about students

CHEM112 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

53% confidence
Based on 1 grades
Most common grades:
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 1 reported grades
A: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+1.01 avg change
Feb
Mar
Sep
Nov
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ASPC131

5.0

(1)

CHEM421

4.8

(5)

CHEM221

4.1

(17)

CHEM131

4.0

(1)

CHEM112

3.7

(6)
+3 more courses
Difficulty by Course

131

4.4

APSC171

4.0

APSC131

3.8

ASPC131

3.0

CHEM112

3.0

Reviews (111)
3.0
4.0
131
Nov 11, 2002

He overcomplicates things.

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 11, 2002

Talks waaaayyyy above our heads.

1.0
4.0
APSC131
Nov 11, 2002

He is a really good professor, but can't teach, and helps very little

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 11, 2002

Just reads overheads, no insight given

1.0
4.0
131
Nov 11, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
131
Nov 12, 2002

incomplete notes, reads overheads... avoid if possible

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 12, 2002

I used to like chem when Newstead was teaching

2.0
5.0
131
Nov 12, 2002

He's smart. Just that he can't teach for his life.

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 12, 2002

This man could make boiling water complicated.

5.0
1.0
APSC131
Nov 12, 2002

Give the guy a break, hes a good teacher, it's just complicated material

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 12, 2002

No Comments

2.0
4.0
APSC131
Nov 12, 2002

Why did I bother going to class? Waste of time.

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 13, 2002

we apparently learned it in high school after all.......

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 14, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 14, 2002

Greg, buddy, this is NOT easy

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 15, 2002

Learn how to teach

3.0
4.0
APSC171
Nov 16, 2002

Nice guy... bad teacher

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 16, 2002

Nice guy, helpful 1:1 but in not in a large class. Doesn't explain nearly enough

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 17, 2002

Greg, are you only here for the research?

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 18, 2002

ughhh..... we did it in HIGH SCHOOL!??!?@@?

2.0
4.0
APSC131
Nov 19, 2002

Does not know how to teach.

4.0
4.0
APSC131
Nov 19, 2002

Quite possibly the worst prof at Queen's.

3.0
2.0
APSC131
Nov 21, 2002

high school...HIGH SCHOOL?! eh... but overall a nice guy.....

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 28, 2002

Doesn't teach at a first year level.

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Dec 8, 2002

I had no idea what he was talking about the entire time he was there

1.0
3.0
APSC131
Dec 21, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Feb 3, 2003

what a wonderful formula sheet, he gives us 4 of the 30 formulas we need 2 kno

3.0
3.0
APSC131
Feb 14, 2003

He seems nice, but not a very good lecturer - his slides are too confusing

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Mar 12, 2003

Not a good lecturer, not clear at all, expected too much prior knowledge

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Mar 28, 2003

The worst prof in first year eng. Without a doubt.

3.0
2.0
APSC131
Jul 27, 2003

He wasn't as bad as people thought. Exams were fair...it's just that he wasn't the best in teaching. But Chemistry itself is pretty easy...so I had no problems to learn on my own. Newstead was the best prof

3.0
3.0
131
Aug 8, 2003

Vern nice man but couldn't teach a lecture to save his life.

3.0
3.0
APSC131
Nov 2, 2003

Smart guy. Not a terrible lecturer, but sometimes hard to understand because of his accent.

1.0
4.0
APSC131
Nov 7, 2003

Poorly prepared lectures (eg referring to notes that do not show up because of the unadjusted projector that he will not fix), lecturing ability can be improved to keep it flowing, not a lot of interactivity between the class and him during lectures.

3.0
3.0
APSC131
Nov 7, 2003

umm, ummm, ahhm, that's what he says, and he says it alot. half of his lectures are just extended vowel sounds. geez, made me fall asleep. i dont know the guy personally and he seems to be generally happy, but, he just doesnt teach well.

1.0
2.0
APSC131
Nov 8, 2003

mabe if he could say what he was thinking it might be better

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 9, 2003

"Is it one? or two? The answer is no."

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 10, 2003

so hard to follow what he's talking about. He seems really nice but he just doesn't lecture well.

3.0
3.0
APSC131
Nov 11, 2003

Not that great in teaching, but he's a good person

5.0
2.0
APSC131
Nov 14, 2003

So nice! and willing to help!

1.0
4.0
APSC131
Nov 17, 2003

Introducing the Dr Jerkiewcz joke that's not actually a joke: We believe that he is trying to tell a joke, yet there is no substantial evidence that it is a joke, so we can never really tell. His subpar lecturing with his dry humour=hard class to sit thru

3.0
3.0
APSC131
Nov 17, 2003

He tries, I think he just doens't get it that we don't understand. His lecture notes tie my brain in knots. Good person tho.

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 17, 2003

I just don't understand anything he teaches, he makes no sense to me.

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 19, 2003

He has got to learn english a little better and also learn how to say carbon. Oh yah he should probably stop making up words in class cause they just dont make sense.

5.0
3.0
APSC131
Nov 19, 2003

A pretty good prof. Has an obvious passion for chemistry and seems to enjoy teaching. Prepare for the lectures by reading over the material to be covered in class - it helps!

5.0
1.0
APSC131
Nov 19, 2003

dont grill the guy because of his accent, he is a very nice man, and knows what he is talking about, maybe you guys should give him a chance

4.0
2.0
APSC131
Nov 19, 2003

Very nice man. I don't know why people don't like him. If you were smart enough to get into Queen's, you can bear with this professor too. He is not a bad prof or anything.

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 21, 2003

Absolutely horrible teacher. Is not clear in his lectures and is never willing to help outside of class time. When you ask him a question, he just tells you to read the ntoes.

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 23, 2003

very nice. But his lectures are confusing. And he answers questions with "read the webnotes"

3.0
3.0
APSC131
Nov 24, 2003

Very Nice guy

2.0
4.0
APSC131
Dec 2, 2003

Danger, APSC 131 students, Danger

5.0
4.0
APSC131
Dec 3, 2003

Cool guy

1.0
5.0
APSC131
Dec 8, 2003

This guy sucks. Beware...

3.0
3.0
APSC131
Dec 15, 2003

BORING

2.0
5.0
APSC131
Dec 27, 2003

i love chemistry with a passion, and he made me question how i feel towards this course. he is just too unclear, and doesnt' specify in lectures what is really important. not to mention his equation sheet for 131 exam really pissed me off. argh!

2.0
4.0
APSC131
Dec 27, 2003

Seems nice but doesn't know how to teach. Makes everything so confusing and un-clear

2.0
3.0
APSC131
Mar 27, 2004

Jerkiewicz is a good guy and he may be very smart. But his lectures were ridiculous. I ended up teaching myself the chemistry that was covered in his lectures and he was getting paid! How awesome!

4.0
5.0
131
May 9, 2004

He is very nice, helpful and accomodating outside of class, but he gets a bad rap becauase the material he teaches is so much harder than the rest of the course. Students think the teachres confusing instead of the material. Go ask him, you'll understand.

5.0
3.0
ASPC131
Oct 28, 2004

Very intelligent, and an excellent prof who can explain the most unusual things quite clearly.

4.0
5.0
131
Oct 29, 2004

No Comments

4.0
2.0
CHEM131
Nov 4, 2004

Regonize! lol he tends to say this regularly throughout the classes...about 40 times a lecture!!

4.0
2.0
APSC131
Nov 4, 2004

RECONIZE.......Great guy, little hard to understand sometimes.

5.0
3.0
APSC131
Nov 5, 2004

Awesome

2.0
4.0
APSC131
Nov 5, 2004

if it weren't for recognize there would be no point going to the lectures...you basically have to teach yourself the course.

2.0
4.0
APSC131
Grade: A
Nov 7, 2004

No Comments

4.0
3.0
APSC131
Nov 8, 2004

He's intelligent

5.0
2.0
APSC131
Nov 15, 2004

Great lectures

5.0
5.0
APSC131
Nov 15, 2004

Best prof in first year engineering

5.0
2.0
APSC131
Nov 16, 2004

The best prof of APSC 131, who knows how to explain the difficult material

3.0
3.0
APSC131
Nov 19, 2004

My favourite word is REKONIZE

4.0
3.0
APSC131
Dec 13, 2004

Good teacher, cares about the students, his accent can make things a bit confusing though. His penmanship is very decorative, and I love it when he says Recognize.

5.0
3.0
APSC131
Dec 13, 2004

recognize that this is a great teacher

5.0
4.0
APSC131
Dec 14, 2004

Hard course, great prof!!

4.0
5.0
APSC131
Dec 15, 2004

Lecture notes aren't helpful, and I needed to read the textbook to understand certain parts. Otherwise, he's alright.

4.0
4.0
APSC131
Dec 16, 2004

A great prof. He got stuck teaching what seemed like the hardest part of the course, but did a great job. His accent was a bit hard to understand sometimes, but I rarely had a problem with that. So, in summation, a great prof.

3.0
3.0
APSC131
Dec 26, 2004

He's not too bad!!

5.0
3.0
APSC131
Dec 30, 2004

Really good guy. Deserves more recognition than what his ratings are like.

2.0
3.0
APSC131
Jan 5, 2005

Hard to understand, except when he says "recognize."

4.0
3.0
APSC131
Jan 13, 2005

Very good prof

5.0
3.0
APSC131
Feb 11, 2005

No Comments

5.0
3.0
APSC131
Feb 24, 2005

Good prof.

4.0
5.0
APSC131
Feb 26, 2005

Alright prof, got stuck with the difficult part of the course to teach, his notes were not that good. Also not a captivating speaker, sometimes made it difficult to pay attention.

4.0
3.0
APSC131
Feb 27, 2005

Got a lot more criticism than he deserved, needs more mature students.

4.0
3.0
CHEM221
Mar 24, 2005

Shows genuine concern for students -wants them to learn material and do well. Good notes. Makes best of a fairly dry course. Funny and has a good sense of humour, also we enjoy the random video clips.

5.0
2.0
CHEM221
Apr 12, 2005

Well taught course. He cares for students. Great atmosphere in class

5.0
3.0
CHEM221
Apr 14, 2005

One of the most interesting courses I have this year. Dr. Jerkiewicz is a very good teacher and he is really fair.

2.0
3.0
CHEM221
Apr 18, 2005

God, this was a bad class. It's not entirely his fault since it's dry material but he doesn't help by teaching right from the text with internet notes. Anyone who can should avoid this class and those who have to take it should hope they don't get this guy.

5.0
1.0
CHEM221
Apr 19, 2005

i love this prof. he is funny and is far more accomodating than he should be, and he is far underappreciate in applied science. i really liked this course once it ventured from thermochemistry. he is extremely approachable and helpful. his lecture notes are good and his lectures are fun.

1.0
1.0
CHEM221
Apr 19, 2005

Great notes but he seemed to be reading them more than explaining them. Explanations in general suffered from something fierce. LOOOVED the open book policy. Thanks for taking 45 minutes out of your day to show up to the three-hour final. Really appreciated that, you're a team player.

4.0
3.0
CHEM221
Apr 19, 2005

Prof. Jerkiewicz is awesome! He's the nicest prof ever!

5.0
2.0
CHEM221
May 4, 2005

Excellent prof, interesting course, great notes, fair exams, all around awesome.

5.0
1.0
CHEM221
Feb 16, 2006

Interesting lectures and well organized lecture notes

5.0
3.0
CHEM221
Mar 20, 2006

Very well-organized, easy-to-follow material. Open-book tests!

5.0
1.0
CHEM221
Mar 25, 2006

He likes the subject and enjoys teaching it. Good prof to have. Open-book exam is great.

4.0
5.0
CHEM221
Apr 5, 2006

Sweet little old man - I just adore this guy. However, the subject is really damned hard (especially for the physics non-inclined), and sometimes it's difficult to figure out what he's trying to say. The open book tests were a life saver, and you really got the idea taht he wanted you to do well. Awesome prof!

5.0
2.0
CHEM421
Sep 20, 2006

He seems to care about us, clear explenations, so far interesting

5.0
1.0
CHEM221
Feb 12, 2007

This professor is just great!

5.0
4.0
CHEM221
Mar 17, 2007

This site should consider only more recent ratings in the overall prof-smiley. It seems, from ancient posts, that he used to bore students to tears. These days, however, he deserves all smiles! Perhaps extra smiles for improving so much! The material's tough (especially thermo) but the funny/useful applications and his anectodes are fabulous.

5.0
3.0
CHEM421
Sep 25, 2007

what can I say...except he is the best prof in the chem department hands down! I took his 4th year course simply because he was teaching it.

5.0
2.0
CHEM421
Dec 3, 2007

Want to learn something new in a friendly and stimulating atmpsphere? Take this course.

4.0
1.0
CHEM421
Dec 12, 2007

One of my favourite professors at Queen's. Really cares about his students, and does his best to make you enjoy his classes. Would definitely recommend this prof.

5.0
3.0
CHEM421
Jan 3, 2008

One love.

2.0
1.0
CHEM221
Mar 3, 2011

Open note exams and uses questions straight from the text book assigned questions that you get to bring to class. He puts no work into his lectures the figures are stolen straight from the text. He gets good marks cus he babies us.

2.0
4.0
CHEM221
May 12, 2011

The first half of the course was a gong show (thermodynamics...) but once he got into the materials stuff it got a little more interesting (still fell asleep in class a lot, though). Not the most approachable person (especially due to serial napping). I relied heavily on the textbook. Open book did not go well.

5.0
2.0
CHEM221
Sep 29, 2011

What a great teacher

5.0
1.0
CHEM112
Feb 27, 2012

FAV PROF!

4.0
3.0
CHEM112
Mar 29, 2012

So hard to understand at times, but he's a super nice guy who puts a LOT of effort into making sure you understand the material and are ready for the exam.

2.0
4.0
CHEM112
Sep 3, 2012

He's a nice guy, and he seemed to care about the students, but his accent made it difficult to understand what he was saying sometimes. It got better as time went by, but he still seemed to go through things a little quickly

5.0
2.0
CHEM112
Nov 30, 2012

Great teacher that really cares about students. Puts a lot of effort into making sure students understand by using lots of analogies and examples. Funny and engaging. Creates a great atmosphere to learn in

3.0
4.0
CHEM112
Dec 11, 2012

funny guy, wants his students to do well, too bad he isn't very easy to understand... only had him for 3 weeks, it was plenty...

3.0
4.0
CHEM112
Jan 20, 2013

good guy, clearly cares about his students and want them to do well, but does a horrible job explaining the material with useless "virtual experiments" and his exam was very tough

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

53% confidence
Based on 1 grades
Most common grades:
A (1)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 1 reported grades
A: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+1.01 avg change
Feb
Mar
Sep
Nov
Dec
Jan
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ASPC131

5.0

(1)

CHEM421

4.8

(5)

CHEM221

4.1

(17)

CHEM131

4.0

(1)

CHEM112

3.7

(6)
+3 more courses
Difficulty by Course

131

4.4

APSC171

4.0

APSC131

3.8

ASPC131

3.0

CHEM112

3.0

Similar Professors