3.0

Hilary Knight

English - University of Victoria

3.0
Quality
4.1
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
125
Reviews
3.0
Quality
4.1
Difficulty
2.8
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

125

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
125 total ratings

5

37

4

17

3

18

2

37

1

16

What Students Say

I highly recommend you take English 145, because its got great course material, but stay away from this woman

ENGL145 - 2.0 rating

However, she is a great prof

ENGL145 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

56% confidence
Based on 2 grades
Most common grades:
A (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 2 reported grades
A: 1
A+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.03 avg change
Oct
Dec
Feb
Mar
Sep
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENGL125

5.0

(1)

ENGL200C

5.0

(1)

ENGLISH200

5.0

(1)

ENGL200B

5.0

(1)

200B

5.0

(1)
+25 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENGL115

5.0

ENG1356

5.0

ENG150

5.0

ENGLISH135

5.0

ENGLISH

5.0

Reviews (124)
5.0
2.0
ENG125
Jun 3, 2002

Willing to go out of her way to help students, something rare in this university

4.0
4.0
ENG115
Jun 4, 2002

Quite bitter, but her rants do entertain. Always willing to give extra help.

5.0
3.0
ENGL125
Jun 4, 2002

strict on grammar but very great person!!

1.0
5.0
115
Jun 13, 2002

****, bitter towards the world, she must have wrote her ow n rev iews/drop her

5.0
2.0
ENG200
Sep 6, 2002

Wonderful prof, great sense of humour

2.0
3.0
ENG200
Sep 15, 2002

No Comments

2.0
5.0
ENGL115
Sep 23, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
ENG1356
Oct 31, 2002

Very angry woman...supposidly messed up on her thesis, and never let that go

2.0
4.0
125
Nov 13, 2002

Insults students when they don't respond I've seen more life in a pound of lard

5.0
4.0
ENG145
Nov 15, 2002

I really neat lady who doesnt' take any crap

5.0
3.0
ENG145
Nov 18, 2002

Very intelligent, eloquent, great sense of humour

3.0
3.0
ENG135
Nov 29, 2002

She phoned me at home once! Insults public education, but is halarious

2.0
5.0
ENGL200
Dec 2, 2002

she's totally brutal when it comes to marks. she says you're ok, then fails you

2.0
4.0
ENG135
Dec 2, 2002

She and Hitler are great friends

4.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 4, 2002

Very strict with marking, yet a great sense of humor. A good teacher.

2.0
4.0
ENG116
Dec 10, 2002

No Comments

2.0
5.0
ENG150
Dec 21, 2002

teaches through intimidation, the worst professor I've ever had

2.0
5.0
ENG125
Jan 8, 2003

an intellectual snob, thinks everyone is somehow below her

5.0
4.0
ENGL200C
Jan 10, 2003

Super smart, super cool, super kind, super prof. Love her.

5.0
2.0
ENG145
Jan 13, 2003

Brilliant and hilariously witty. Knows her stuff. Hard marker but fair.

2.0
4.0
ENG115
Jan 17, 2003

Her class was like being poked in the eye witha sharp stick.. the worst teacher

2.0
5.0
ENG125
Jan 20, 2003

tough marker, her opinions only count it seems

1.0
5.0
ENG115
Jan 24, 2003

If you have the choice switch to another section, it's not worth it to get an F

2.0
5.0
ENG115
Feb 25, 2003

This course was as painful as getting your wisdom teeth pulled. H.Knigth trys to kill you

3.0
4.0
ENG145
Feb 27, 2003

If you are a guy avoid this woman. I think shes a real man hater

3.0
5.0
115
Mar 9, 2003

Get out while you can...she will fail everyone. pop quizs just about everyday that are impossible. she hates soc. sci. students. Switch now!

1.0
5.0
ENG135
Mar 13, 2003

If you are male watch out. If you don't always say WOMAN GOOD MAN BAD watch out.

5.0
2.0
ENGLISH200
Mar 16, 2003

i don't get the other comments either, this women takes you on a trip! she knows her stuff , and loves to teach- what more could you want? BUT she hates padding and fluff- get right to the point and she will give you an A

5.0
5.0
ENG145
Mar 17, 2003

I GOT 98% IN ENG 12 AND IM STRUGGLING TO PASS HER COURSE, SHE IS THE BEST LECTURER EVER, AND THE MATERIAL IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND BUT SHE KILLS YOU ON ESSAY COMPOSITION SKILLS. HARDEST MARKER BUT I CAN'T HELP BUT LOVE HER, SHE'S AN AWESOME PROF!

4.0
4.0
ENG145
Apr 3, 2003

her attitude seems totally pretentious. i really dont like hilary knight

5.0
5.0
115
Apr 10, 2003

Her standards are very high...but if you put the time into your work, you'll be rewarded...so don't expect an easy grade.she hates cluttered writing..so get rid of all the fillers.learned a great deal from her but my GPA did drop as a result

5.0
4.0
ENGL200
Apr 21, 2003

This prof is the sole reason I chose medieval lit as a major. Her lectures are nothing short of inspired and they will leave with with an amazing feeling and a sense of inspiration. TAKE HER CLASS, but don't expect an easy ride.

4.0
5.0
ENG115
Jun 25, 2003

Her lectures are OK. However, her marking is too strict. She drops most international students, saying, "This is not an ESL class."

3.0
5.0
ENG145
Jul 17, 2003

Very Intelligent, doesn't really like to help you that much, sends you to the writing center instead, expects a little too much from first years. And Damn she needs new clothes. what is with the gumboots, tights and oversized 80's sweater?

5.0
5.0
ENG145
Jul 18, 2003

LOVED THIS PROF! She drives the class with inspiration and a love for the subject. She is a fully dedicated teacher who's door is always open for help. Not an easy class, but english is a hard subject. Highly recommend this teacher.

3.0
5.0
ENG115
Oct 7, 2003

This woman is very snobby, and a total academic elitist. She made me feel like a total idiot--but it made me work harder and now I teach english.....

1.0
5.0
ENG115
Oct 11, 2003

This woman is evil. She is the worst prof ever! She doesn't help you.. she just fails you. Drop now! Before its too late... You can never erase an F from your transcript and she loves giving them.

4.0
5.0
145
Oct 16, 2003

hilary is a total academic elitest and it is as if she enjoys seeing students do badly. she makes disheartening remarks such as "you are all graduates of self esteem academies." she is not a boring prof but she is discouraging, which is disapp

1.0
5.0
ENG145
Oct 25, 2003

Hilary excels in lectures, however has failed to comply with the high standards of grooming at the University of Victoria. Get that frizz under control. Lose the gumboots, and for heaven sakes, never recite poetry again. I left uninspired.Drop this class!

5.0
3.0
ENGL145
Oct 26, 2003

Hilary is an amazing prof and person. She is very willing to help out and expects nothing short of the best from her students. She will push you to do well and you will actually learn something. She is wonderful.

2.0
2.0
ENGL
Oct 31, 2003

Not the most enthusiastic prof I've ever had.

3.0
5.0
ENG145
Nov 12, 2003

Expects far too much. Her usage of those stupid little abbreviations covers your papers that she hands back to you. I couldn't make out all of them, and I definitely did not have the energy to try and figure out what the hell all those little marksmeant

5.0
4.0
ENGL200B
Dec 2, 2003

If you go to class and take notes then she is a pleasant and enthusiastic prof. Gives excellent advice and knows what she is talking about. A tough marker but fair and gives decent, constructive feedback for future assignments. I'd gladly have her again.

2.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 4, 2003

do not take a class from this woman. she's crazy and is very rude and mean on feedback of papers and does not give constructive critism. she's a good lecturer but she disects stories way too much so they're no longer enjoyable. didnt learn a damn thing

2.0
5.0
ENG145
Dec 7, 2003

She was constantly putting the class down and making fun of our english skills instead of helping us. She actually told a student that she was not going to mark his paper because he was doing so poor and she didn't think it was worth her time.

5.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 10, 2003

She is an excellent prof. Knows her stuff and is willing to help as much as she can. Her class is enjoyable and humorous.

2.0
5.0
ENG200B
Jan 3, 2004

Takes herself and her marking too seriously.. her class was an elective of mine and she ruined my gpa. stay away. She seemed to think a second year course should be taught like one but marked like a 4th or 5th year course.

1.0
1.0
ENG145
Grade: A
Feb 23, 2004

Hilary Knight needs to take a step back and realize she's marking 1st year writing...Not a masters english class. Do not take this class unless u have a Lit background

5.0
1.0
200B
Feb 26, 2004

Nice prof, easy marker. As long as you attend the lectures and do the readings you'll do fine. All she's looking for is her lectures spat back at her. She is clear as can be in what she wants. Her pop quizzes are annoying though! Stay caught up!

4.0
3.0
ENGL135
Apr 3, 2004

A bit dramatic for 830 in the morning! The course was all grammar so it was pretty hard for her to screw up. The "acedemic reading" in the course was almost ALL humanities...great if you're going to be a humanities major, not so good for other

5.0
3.0
ENGL145
Apr 5, 2004

Hilary is amazing! She is lots of fun and makes the course interesting. She does not like people who slack off and expect to get a good grade, why should she? I strongly recommend her as a prof.

5.0
4.0
ENG200B
Apr 16, 2004

Be prepared to be insulted if your spelling is bad.

1.0
5.0
ENG115
Apr 21, 2004

shes brutal

4.0
3.0
ENGLISH145
Apr 21, 2004

Hilary is dramatic and makes a long hour and a half class fun. She knows a lot and is good at lecturing. She's picky about grammar but it's helpful.

3.0
4.0
ENG115
May 19, 2004

I took 115 because I thought it would be easier then 135, but with her I was wrong. Not only was she arrogant and stubborn but he was always commenting on things she clearly knew nothing about. I am a worse writer after taking her couse.

3.0
3.0
ENG145
Jun 22, 2004

It's true, her expecations for a crummy 1st yr english are slightly ridiculous. Never encourages or even allows discussion or conversation about the works studied. The perks: Her flowing grey mullet and openly sexual and scatalogical humour.

2.0
4.0
145
Jul 1, 2004

Horrible lady, turned me off of English. She called herself a facist, and she definatly WASNT kidding!!!

1.0
5.0
ENG115
Jul 30, 2004

this prof sucks... worst class ever.. she tries to be funny but she is actually annoying.hard marker, very picky and has pop quizes which are pain in the ass. Such a B....

3.0
4.0
115
Aug 23, 2004

drop asap

2.0
4.0
ENG145
Aug 31, 2004

i hated h. knight. she always made comments and used stereotypes i found very offensive. her way is the only way; everyone who thinks differently is clearly of lower intelligence and far inferior. her quizzes are pointless. only prof i warn people about

4.0
4.0
ENG125
Sep 11, 2004

Very tough prof. Taking her class during a regular school year would be much more beneficial. I took in in the summer with very limited time for her to instruct us on how to write a decent paper. Nevertheless, it's good prep for future english courses.

5.0
3.0
FIRSTYEAR
Oct 6, 2004

I took her first year class 5 years ago. She's a great teacher. Very encouraging. I loved her stories (complete with accents!) about arguing the merits of Joyce in an Irish pub. Is she still wearing those boots? Take her class! You'll like it!

3.0
5.0
ENG145
Nov 15, 2004

ridiculously high expectations for a first year course. picky, picky marker. Fast paced (couple days to read Othello) Quizes pointless and ambiguous (ESP needed to write on her ideas or else fail). pages and pages of notes from her lectures every class. Has good energy though, knows her stuff,funny.

2.0
5.0
145
Nov 18, 2004

Her expectations are way too high for a first year class. If you don't put her opinion in your essay you will fail. I advice ppl not to take a class which she teaches. I also am upset by her nasty remarks which put ppl down.

3.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 12, 2004

If only Knight could pass on her enthusiasm for english to her students. She is very intelligent and witty, but she marks first year classes way too hard. She wastes paper like you wouldnt belive- use an overhead!

2.0
5.0
ENGLISH145
Jan 5, 2005

Nice woman. She knows what shes talking about and is very enthusiastic about what she teaches. However her opinion is the only one that matters and is therefore the only one thats right. She is a ridiculously hard marker and is very unhelpful when you go to her for help.

5.0
3.0
ENG101
Jan 27, 2005

Contrary to other comments, I found her to be interesting, hilarious and helpful. I'm now doing my Bachelor's of Education at UBC, and I STILL think about her class from time to time. She's also the friendliest prof I've had. If you work hard, you'll do fine.

3.0
4.0
ENG145
Mar 24, 2005

Her lectures are entertaining, but her put-down humour is not. She is a harsh marker, and expects perfect grammar and clarity of quizzes she gives students two minutes to write. She's certainly turned me off English.

5.0
3.0
ENG145
May 5, 2005

Although Knight can be a tightass, her lectures are interesting. She's good and she knows it. Keep your head up and you'll do fine.

4.0
4.0
ENG145
May 8, 2005

Entertaining lectures (especially before the novel/drama work actually begins--it's all downhill from there). Tough marker. Why the unnecessary difficulty for a first-year class? Not an easy English elective; choose another Prof for that. Learned surprisingly little. Very likable woman though.

3.0
5.0
ENGL145
Jun 8, 2005

Veeery hard marker, she will not help your GPA. She is entertaining though and clearly loves what she teaches. Nice lady, but expects far too much for first year English

1.0
5.0
ENG115
Jun 14, 2005

No Comments

4.0
5.0
ENG200
Jun 30, 2005

ouch! What a brutal woman!

2.0
5.0
ENGLISH135
Jul 6, 2005

Okay simply put great person but loves her grammer way too much. If you are lookng to do a class for the love of english this prof is not your friend. If you like to learn all the ironic subtlies to your writing this prof is your friend

2.0
5.0
ENG145
Jul 7, 2005

RUN AWAY, this prof is a nightmare. on the first day, she handed out sheets explaining why none of us should expect a good grade, along with a newsclip about the failings of the uvic english students. I dropped her class - take markham, he's gold.

2.0
5.0
ENG135
Aug 29, 2005

She is a very hard marker and I would advise most people to drop her class. She is extremely unhelpful. I went to her office hours on a weekly basis only to listen to her rant about the high school education system. She is a nice lady, but should not be teaching.

5.0
4.0
ENGLISH145
Sep 20, 2005

I really like Hilary. She is tough, that's true, but she helped me alot and I ended up with a good grade in her class --why? Because I worked for it. Her lectures are fascinating and she has a wicked sense of humour. I like being challenged by professors and that's what I pay my money for. If you're looking for easy street, get out of uni.

5.0
3.0
ENG145
Sep 23, 2005

One of the few good teachers i've had at UVic. Its true she can mark harshly, but why should you expect her to let go english errors when it is an english class? Lectures were good as well.

5.0
3.0
ENGL145
Grade: A+
Oct 2, 2005

Awesome prof - she brings books to life! Plus she's hilarious, which will keep students awake. She's a tough marker, but it only helped me to become a better essay writer.

2.0
5.0
ENG145
Oct 23, 2005

RUN, RUN FAR, FAR AWAY (AND FAST!!!)

1.0
5.0
ENG145
Nov 21, 2005

avoid if you can. she's sweet but her expectations of students are needlessly high. it's as if she wants you to already be a prof of english literature before you take the 100 level course, in order to deserve a reputable grade. there, i said it.

3.0
4.0
ENGLISH145
Nov 27, 2005

she's very interesting during the lesson but her quizzes are mind bogglingly hard and her expectations on work are very high. I switched into her class late and she said I had to write an essay due the next day or else I'd get an "N" in the course, I could hand it in late but then I'd get percentage taken off

5.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 1, 2005

Don't expect a good mark unless you wring your brain out thoroughly and get every last bit of juice onto the page. Quizes? Read DETAILS (like lines in songs in Much Ado, professions of insignificant chars). Lectures? Best in the world! She's a great person, I love her British humour, and she's very sweet. Take this class for lectueres, not credits

2.0
4.0
ENG135
Jan 8, 2006

I just graduated from UVIC and Hillary Knight was the worst prof I had the entire time. She was such a bad teacher that I still dislike her as a person 4 years later.

5.0
5.0
ENGL145
Feb 7, 2006

Teachers who push us beyond our recognizable limits are the ones that give us the most knowledge and improvement. Yes... she's incredibly tough, but very willing to help. She is fair. If you're an idiot and do stupid things like show up late for class and don't read the books, then good luck. Otherewise, give her a chance to help you.

5.0
5.0
ENG145
Feb 8, 2006

She expects a LOT out of her students, but in return she expects her students to expect a LOT out of HER. If you're going to wine about having to do a lot of work and having to live up to high expectations than she is not the prof for you... Grow up and welcome to university.

3.0
5.0
ENGLISH
Feb 26, 2006

I dont like her! She always calls her self "Fascist **** from hell" as a joke.

1.0
3.0
145
Mar 3, 2006

She is horrible!!! One of the worst teachers in my years at UVic. Would not recommend her class. Totally uninspiring....in fact I changed my major because she totally turned me off english.

2.0
5.0
ENG145
Mar 3, 2006

If you are going to be miserable all the time, safe us all the grief and retire. There are plenty of young teachers that want to be here and want to help young minds learn and grow. When she is not treating her students like they are 10 years old, she is mocking them in front of the class. Don't take this class!!

5.0
4.0
ENG200C
Mar 21, 2006

I've got to say she's the best prof I've ever had. Granted I am partial to the material, but I found she was a really entertaining lecturer. If you're not passionate about literature, don't take one of her classes, because she doesn't do anything other than stand there and lecture, but I found her funny and really informative. Loved her class.

2.0
5.0
ENG100
Mar 24, 2006

You know what they say: Those that can't do, teach and make life miserable for everyone else in the process. I feel ill every time I walk past the room I took her class in. AWFUL!

2.0
4.0
ENG145
Apr 10, 2006

This prof was uninspiring, offensive and impossible to please. Her assignments were far too specific and lacked any semblance of coherant thought. I went into this class with a love of literature and left with the distinct impression that I'd rather have hot bamboo sticks under my fingernails than ever see this woman again.

3.0
4.0
ENGL145
Jul 6, 2006

EXTREMELY Difficult class. Try to get into a different teachers' class if possible. Lectures were interesting though but almost impossible to get an A. Getting a B in this class is like getting an A in any other class.

1.0
4.0
ENG145
Nov 4, 2006

Knight is an very hard maker and expects you to know every detail talked about in class even though she NEVER takes notes! Her midterm exams were marked very unfair... this was a pointless class and didnt advance my english skills at all. She has her favourites, so if you arent one of them, she'll make it hell for you. DO NOT TAKE THIS COURSE.

4.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 6, 2006

Class is not bad. found it frustrating at times as a male due to the aggressive emphasis on feminism and my friend was offended by careless remarks about christianity. makes wild leaps of faith for strange metaphors and connections to Jungian psychology (another obsession of this prof) very opinionated, but with good observations and good material

3.0
5.0
ENGL145
Dec 12, 2006

Initially I thought her clever, but realized that her original ideas were all limited and related. She's one dimensional in connecting everything with feminism and Jungian pshycology. Very tedious class and you're expected to take emmaculate notes. Good luck. Marks hard.

5.0
3.0
ENGL145
Jan 4, 2007

Somehow manages to link everything to Carl Jung - no matter the subject. Other than that, entertaining and polite. Not a super easy marker, but I had fun.

5.0
2.0
ENG145
Feb 6, 2007

absolutley great teacher, easy to follow and effective in explaining key elements of books such as the edible women. helpful when a class has been missed to make sure you catch up with the rest of the class. tons of fun, allowing for a better learning experience

2.0
4.0
ENGL145
Feb 23, 2007

DO NOT like this prof. made very irrelevant comments relating to sucide, feminism etc. Exams were very hard and no matter how much I read the material it didnt make a difference. I dont reccomend this prof. unless you have no other option for taking a different class.

1.0
5.0
ENGL145
Mar 10, 2007

I cant believe how many people gave this prof good reviews... oh well each to his own but I totally think you should NOT take her class. I worked my a$$ off and still got a terrible grade. I know that I am a good writer because all of my other essays (in 3rd year classes) I do well on. Knight it no fair and no fun. yuck

5.0
4.0
ENG145
Apr 23, 2007

Interesting class and entertaining lectures! Just make sure you take real good notes, and reread them before the midterm/final. Yeah, and make sure you actually read the books too.

2.0
4.0
ENGL145
Dec 6, 2007

More interested in preaching her opinions than teaching what students need to learn. Unclear when explaining test and exam prep. If you're any normal person who can't attend every single one of her classes...then dont bother signing up.

2.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 13, 2007

I didn't enjoy this class at all, although her lectures were intresting she made lots of unrelated comments, and was an extremely hard marker, I know from other classes I write good papers but not according to her. If you don't have to don't take this course.

2.0
5.0
ENG135
Dec 14, 2007

No Comments

2.0
5.0
ENGL145
Dec 21, 2007

a nice lady, however takes pleasure in your pain. Extremely hard marker and narrow minded especially towards feminism and Jungian psychology. I highly recommend you take English 145, because its got great course material, but stay away from this woman!

1.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 22, 2007

Do NOT take this class she is the worst teacher...if you want to get a bad mark and completely bring down your GPA then take her class

4.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 23, 2007

Good prof who marks tough. If you get a bad mark, it's your own damn fault! QUIT WHINING AND SUCK IT UP.

4.0
4.0
ENG145
Dec 23, 2007

Good prof, tough marker. If you get a bad mark, it's your own fault! QUIT WHINING AND SUCK IT UP is her main message; go to class, do the work, and you'll be marked accordingly.

5.0
5.0
ENG145
Jan 17, 2008

Great class. She knows her stuff. You must work for your grade, however.

4.0
4.0
ENG200B
Feb 11, 2008

I liked her. When she lectures, she sometimes throws in a bunch of completely un-related things...which are usually quite funny! Clearly enjoys the material she teaches, as she is always laughing while lecturing. VERY strict on attendance, keeping up on the reading, and participation in class. If you take a class with her, be prepared to work hard!

2.0
5.0
ENG135
Apr 11, 2008

Extremely harsh marker. Her class was quite informative but expectations were unreasonable. Often had quick quizzes at the start of class that were nearly impossible unless you spend 2 hours carefully going through a quick reading assignment before every class looking up definitions for words...

5.0
4.0
ENGL145
Apr 21, 2008

After reading the comments on this page I was terrified to take Knight's class. However, she is a great prof. She cares only if YOU care. She offers to take students out for coffee to talk about whatever difficulty they are having! Of course those looking for an easy A are mad, she expects you to work for your A and truly learn English. Great Prof!

4.0
4.0
ENGL145
Jun 3, 2008

Awesome as a person - she's "bouncy" and funny, and usually quite nice. She turned otherwise boring lectures into something relatively interesting. But she's a very tough marker. No slacking off in her class.

2.0
5.0
ENGL145
Jun 19, 2008

WORST CLASS AND WORST PROFESSOR IN THE UNIVERSITY! She makes students feel like idiots (unless you are her favourite) and is an EXTREMELY hard marker. AVOID THIS CLASS AT ALL COSTS - otherwise your GPA and your self esteem will plummet.

4.0
4.0
ENG125
Oct 9, 2008

unless you enjoy having views forced on you by a complacently arrogant old woman i suggest you pass on this one. Terminates any form of free thought by telling you in lecture what she knows the symbolic emphasis to be and expects to see these exact words in your essays. snore.

2.0
2.0
ENG135
Dec 23, 2008

I know everyone says there teachers are too hard. However, Knights class is impossible. She has said that a 90 in her class is like a 70 in any other english class. she has dictionary/spelling tests often with words no ones ever heard of. She also takes off major marks for grammar errors. If this course is not your entire life you will not well.

2.0
5.0
ENG135
Dec 23, 2008

This is the WORST teacher ever. She is an old bag who knows her stuff and expects you to didicate your life to english. she gives so many tests, essays and assignments that you other classes will suffer majorly. If you are just taking this course to make requirements find a diff prof!

5.0
4.0
ENG145
Feb 9, 2009

She definitely wasn't an easy prof, but if you show up to class, keep up with the notes, and do all of the assignments you'll do fine! She gives great lectures, chooses interesting books, and because she gives quizzes, a midterm, and a final, you can still do good if your writing skills aren't perfect. My writing definitely did improve though.

5.0
5.0
ENG145
Feb 22, 2009

I took Hilary's class about 4 years ago, and looking back, I appreciate her. She prepared me extremely well for upper level English courses, as well as grad school, by challenging me to do better. If you're an English major, and truly want to improve, take her class. She's tough, but I guarantee you'll find yourself reminiscing about her later!

1.0
5.0
ENG145
Mar 16, 2009

If you are just taking english to satisfy the university requirements DO NOT take it with this prof. I dropped the class half way through because I was getting a C, and the next term I took the same class with a different prof and got an A!! Choose your english prof wisely...stay away!

3.0
5.0
ENG200
Mar 28, 2009

hard marker. Also a bit condescending. however, she is hilarious.

2.0
5.0
ENG135
Sep 13, 2009

Shes a horrible teacher. Does not care about her students at all. Expect a million assignments and vocab tests on british words you've never hear of. If you're only taking this class because you need it, avoid it. I was getting a C dropped it, took the same class next sem and ended up with an A-

5.0
3.0
ENG125
Dec 4, 2009

Well prepared for class. Was passionate about the subject, making it easy to learn! If you have any problems, she will take time out of her schedule to meet with you. Very helpful. Hard marker, but makes the subject so interesting that it's worth the extra work. I highly recommend this professor! I changed my minor to English because of her!

5.0
5.0
ENGLI145
Dec 11, 2009

This professor, having grown tired of trying to teach people who don't want to learn, has retired.

Class Info

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A+

56% confidence
Based on 2 grades
Most common grades:
A (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(2)B(0)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(0)
Based on 2 reported grades
A: 1
A+: 1
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.03 avg change
Oct
Dec
Feb
Mar
Sep
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENGL125

5.0

(1)

ENGL200C

5.0

(1)

ENGLISH200

5.0

(1)

ENGL200B

5.0

(1)

200B

5.0

(1)
+25 more courses
Difficulty by Course

ENGL115

5.0

ENG1356

5.0

ENG150

5.0

ENGLISH135

5.0

ENGLISH

5.0

Similar Professors