2.5
Quality4.5
Difficulty46%
Would Retake110
Reviews46%
Would Retake
110
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
110 total ratings5
15
4
23
3
14
2
22
1
36
What Students Say
“It would be great if the standard Hilmar envisions were a reality in public Universities, but it is not”
HIST439 - 4.0 rating“If you're not very bright or are lazy, avoid this class”
HIS439 - 4.0 ratingClass Info
Attendance Mandatory
92%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.20 avg changeRatings by Course
322
5.0
(1)HIST231
5.0
(1)HIST212
5.0
(1)HIST263
4.0
(1)HST403223
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
106
5.0
223
5.0
HST
5.0
HIST3389
5.0
HIST146
5.0
Reviews (109)
No Comments
No Comments
No Comments
No Comments
he went over materials too fast..!! very hard to follow..!!
Over-sensitive, close-minded
Nice guy, but his marking is ridiculously hard
No Comments
interesting class, but very, very hard
crazy teacher, hard marker, lots of readings and zzz lectures
Pretty interesting Lecture. Nice prof. But too much reading and hard marker.
Iteresting stuff, but he is just way too hard core for his or anyone else's good
very hard. lots of reading but mostly an interesting guy. especially when you find out he sings. in latin. enough said.
Great lectures, but too much reading. Exam essay topics can be deadly boring.
Lectures are fun, but quite a hard marker, great deal of material in the course, but not the most I've seen in a 200 level history course..
Very hard marker. Doesn't like late assignments.
He is difficult to apporach and biased. He has favorites and he is nice to those students only. Very unfreindly and not enough time for students. Bad Prof.
Hard marker, lots and lots of work. Do not disagree with him as this will affect your grade.
He was a very hard marker, very unfair and is definatly not someone who should be teaching a first year class
intellectual snob. During the final he laughed and sighed in disgust aloud as he marked exams as they were being handed in.
A quirky guy, lost in his intellectual world, both cynical and playful. Marks tough, but fair. Interesting style, participation based, not much lecturing. You have to do the readings, or else he can get frustrated with the class.
Very hard marker, and a stickler for punctuality. Has unrealistic expectations for in class assignments. Kind of a jerk about it too.
DO NOT TAKE A COURSE WITH THIS PROF.IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DO WELL.STUDIED FOR WEEKS STRAIGHT FOR TESTS AND I BARELY PASSED!
Rather pretentious - one wonders where he got his quasi-brit accent seeing as he was born in Ontario and educated in the U.S.
Hard marker , very intellectual and smart, hates late students, starts class EARLY so be there extra early or you'll be 'late', makes essays worth a lot, lots of reading and enough homework, essay topics difficult but material covered is sometimes interes
Hilmar constantly comments on the poor level of writing his students exhibit, but does little to help improve it. His essay marking is unrealistic and not constructive in any sense. Does not sufficiently cover material in exams during lectures
I just found that Pabel expected way too much of his students, as well, he expected way too much in term of writing analytical essays. He didnt make this course enjoyable
No Comments
This man is nerdy, quirky, and snobby. He thinks he knows a lot, he is sure of himself, but he is a lousy social scientist. More importantly, he doesn't know how to mark papers. Stay away from this man and his courses. He will ruin your good GPA.
I don't know what everyone is complaining about...he may be tough but he's fair and this is University for heaven's sake, not kindergarten. I really enjoyed his class, he's an engaging prof who challenges you to deepen your understanding. i loved his clas
If you're worried abour ruining your precious GPA, don't take a class with Professor Pabel. If you want to be educated (and actually learn a little bit about the world you live in), do take a class with Professor Pabel.
Not a particularly good teacher, but he knows his stuff and is a *fair* marker - if you write like a 12 year old, you'll fail, but what's wrong with that? His readings are interesting.
Horrendous Prof! He ruined my love of history!
Do not take this class if you do not want to work. Some of the readings were boring and some of the assignments were kind of pointless. But if you're willing to put in the effort and learn/red lots then Pabel is willing to help.
This proff is crazy. He thinks he knows way- too much. He expects way too much of his students. When you go up to him and ask questions, he only bullies you. He has no right to receive pay from out tuitions when everything he is doing for his leisure.
he is unjustly hard.
This guy is easily the worst prof I ever had during my 3 years at SFU. He has a HUGE ego, and his classes are very boring. His marking criteria is a complete mystery. The workload is also unreasonably large.
Arrogant twit who has an ego that fills up the entire room. Doesn't want to hear any opinion other than his own. If you like history stay away from him!
Knows his stuff - so does every history proff at SFU. Unfortunately he looks down on students, holds a negative attitude towards them; will favour a select few students; marks VERY hard; and, as mentioned, is very arrogant.
He was definately not my favourite teacher. First and last class I took with him. I think he marks you on what he thinks you should get rather than what you should. Put in 1 hr of effort or 10 and no difference. Could have been interesting, but wasn't.
Informative, interesting, and clear. Has a bit of an attitude, but overall he's a great prof.
Giant glass ego! Every tutorial uncomfortably spent with everyone staring at the floor, avoiding eye contact while he played "guess what I'm thinking right now." Insecure to the point of unbalanced -- attacking the furniture, shouting at the class... What a nut!
sooo many papers!!!!
DO NOT TAKE A CLASS WITH THIS MAN! His grading is not based on the work, way to much reading, has favourites, makes fun of people when they go to him for help (He actually laughed at me when I went to him with a question!)
worst prof i've ever had, not friendly or helpful at all when u ask questions at his office hrs. boring lecture as well. do not take his class.
Absolutely terrible. Think a C is a good grade, and marks accordingly. Likes nothing more than to hear his own voice. He is the German Al Franken...which is entertaining for maybe half a lecture. I'd rather stab myself in the eye with a pen that take another class with him.
Pabel is a good prof, despite the comments below. If you want to take a class where you will be challenged then he's your guy. Lectures+Tutorials are interesting if your willing to do the readings and be involved.He is a hard marker but his courses are worth taking even if your GPA does take a hit.
Were we in the same class? Prof is rude and condescending to the nth degree. Quite frankly surprised someone has not punched him in the face. Assignments made absolutely no sense and marking even less so.
You never get the right answer with this guy. You're only ever sort of right. I shouldn't have told him someone tinkered with his website so it led to a "adult themed" room. At least he was fun to impersonate.
No Comments
Prof. Pabel is by far the worst professor I have ever had! While he is incredibly smart and well educated, if you expect to get even a B in any of his classes you are expected to actually be smarter then him. even then good luck. I have never been so dissapointed in a class and a professor. I regret meeting the man. He should be reprimanded by SFU.
I don't know what you guys are talking about. If you do the work and are enthusiastic, Dr. Pabel is so helpful. He has a great sense of humour. He's brilliant. Yes, if you slack off, and have a hard time with honest marking systems, you won't like him. But if you want to learn and be challenged, Dr. Pabel is number one.
a great prof. very organized and engaging.
From what I understand, he's a great prof for first year level, but after that he starts to become more and moe difficult. He's a very nice person but definitely not a good teacher. Assignments for the class were basically glorified book reviews where we were expected to recite the prof's personal opinion on the book.
DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS!! I WORN YOU...AND I'M NOT BIASED, BECAUSE HE GAVE ME A BAD GRADE OR ANYTHING, I ENDED UP WITH A B+. BUT I HAD TO WORK TO THE BONE TO GET IT!!!
He's a great guy...but he's a little condescending. Hist 223 is a good course, but you have to work really hard. Midterms are easy, but papers are marked with severe scrutiny. If you ever want a class to laugh in, take this one, especially if you have a retard sitting beside you.
He is a VERY hard marker.. I made the mistake of taking is 223 in my first year and boy was I in for a shock. You are never right with the guy, he seems like he always has some way to disagree with you. Although he is educated, he is hot-head about it and knows that he knows more than you. Expect hard work and your GPA to take a hit! BEWARE
Pabel is absolutely horrible. DO NOT TAKE ANY COURSES HE OFFERS. He even tries to defend his horrible teaching rating on his website http://www.sfu.ca/~pabel/TCV.HTM, anyone who has to do this you know is a terrible professor. STRONGLY AVOID HIM AT ALL COSTS.
He made a girl in my class almost cry. She was borderline tears after he basically told her that her answer was completely wrong and made her look like a fool infront of the whole class.
I first took Hist-223 and did relatively well. Then I took Hist-320 with him... the greatest mistake of my academic life! As a professor he's funny, engaging, and his tests are fair. BUT HE'S INSANELY HARSH WITH HIS ESSAY MARKING. Take his classes only if you don't mind getting a C.
As a teacher he is pretty funny and entertaining. But do not take any of his classes until you've gotten your masters degree. He is absolutely brutal on his essay marking and expect everyone to write just like him.
No Comments
No Comments
Anyone who feels the need to defend and excuse their abilities to lecture on a personal website has issues. If he was a good professor, there'd be no complaints at all - as it is, he's rated lower than any History prof on this site. He should take a serious look at his ability to teach - we pay you to teach us, not to make us do 100% of the work.
No Comments
Entertaining, engaging, challenging. A word to the wise: you CAN get a good mark in his class, but ONLY if you can write. I'm good at essay writing, and thus I got an A-; don't listen to those who say it isn't possible. This guy really makes you think, and that was what *I* thought university was for, don't know about the rest of you guys.
i took a course with him and thought he was a great proff. i leart a lot and he was extremely entertaining and humourous. but i ended up with a crappy mark. the next semester i took another history course with him. just as funny and knowledgable, just as clear. he expects decent effort, and your grade will reflect how much you gave.
A great mind & lecturer. He really challenges you and I too like to think and be challenged. He expects 150% and this means a LOT of work. If you're taking 4+ courses and work a course with Pabel will be too much. But the experience of learning under him is a treat for those who care about expanding their minds & thinking more than GPAs.
It would be great if the standard Hilmar envisions were a reality in public Universities, but it is not. I am not encouraged to continue in history, though I have succeeded with other instructors and still have all the interest I had before. In spite of his ability, I can't help thinking that the pedagogue should inspire interest not dread.
Prof Pabel is a very intelligent prof, but he has certain ideas and interests and if you don't agree with them, or else want to bring in other ideas watch out! I imagine he'd make a great author but I wouldn't take him again as a prof.
Too much busy work, grade not justified could not explain what was wrong with the essay, arbitrary marker
Oh yeah he is so hard. He makes you actually read and think about things. He expects you to show up for class prepared and he even expects you to be able to read and write in english.
After a short lecture, he just went over the readings. Made the class very boring. I don't learn well by reading, so I'd never take another class with him. When he bothered to lecture, it was fine.. Wish he'd just do that, and not rely so much on readings!
Be warned--his marking scheme is vicious (i.e. unrealistic expectations from students). Don't be surprised by an "F" on one of your assignments in his classes... Shudder...
Great Prof! Very hard marker but absolutely wonderful teacher! Very interesting funny and passionate about his subject. Willing to help but you must be willing to do the work! If you are at all interested in his courses I recomend you take him!
Took both 2nd & 3rd year courses with him. Prof. Pabel is a highly intelligent teacher who takes you seriously and who expects you to take him seriously as well. Readings can be heavy, but you aren't paying uni fees for kindergarten levels. He'll give you an A if you deserve one. Put a decent amount of work in, and you will.
If you take one of his classes beware. For tests he asks u 2 write 3 things & gives you 3 1 inch lines then marks them wrong because u didn't explain them, when the quest never asked 4 it.Paper marks r ridiculous, write his opinion & u may survive.
I usually take these ratings with a grain of salt. This is one instance where I should have listened. Difficult, uninspiring, and does not lecture but relies, instead, on the Socratic approach. I did not spend $500+ on a course to have students teach me. More interested in his own research than in his students.
Good prof but demanding. Do the work and be prepared for class. He does give out decent grades if he thinks you have worked for it. Don't be late to class and pay attention to details on the syllabus. If you ask a question he has already given the answer to or you could have found out the answer yourself, he gets annoyed. I enjoyed his class.
Beware. All comments previous to this are absolutely accurate. Extremely tough but not impossible to do well, requires more work than any other class in the dept.
Most people who have complained that he is too hard likely expect easy As in university. Thus when they are expected to read and discuss material every week and write coherent and well researched papers they are horrified. If you're not very bright or are lazy, avoid this class. If you enjoy learning and are reasonably disciplined, youll enjoy it.
mean-spirited and virtually impossible to get above a mediocre mark. Hilmar seems to relish in his student's misery. he is quick to condensendingly correct any little mistake you madeke and will find any reason to not give you a good grade. avoid.
He thinks all of us have only his course to take care of. He imposes pointless ban on primary sources. Plus, he obviously favours some students to others. Unless you're into absurd history or have 1 entire semester just for his one course, avoid at all cost or all your other courses WILL be pulled backward.
this is the hardest marking professor i have ever had. he is very rigid in his delivery, and only allows things done one way. he had a 15 minute quiz worth 5% of the entire class grade based on a 350 page book. i would never take a class from this prof again.
Ie njoy history, and humanities but I feel like Pabel ruined early modern Europe for me forever. Extremely hard marker on papers and quizzes. Closed minded to new views or concepts, used extremely snobby elitist oxford texts. He obviously is a smart man and has a deep interest in the subject, but your views better be EXACTLY the same as his.
Prof. Pabel's class was certainly challenging and required a lot of time and effort, but unlike many other history classes I have taken, I actually feel I truly learned a lot about the course content. He has a lot of knowledge on the topic of European history and his lectures were always thoroughly prepared.
Hard marker but extremely nice prof, who is also extremely smart.Knows everything about what he's teahing. Explains things very clearly, and is the type of prof who actually seems to care about the students, and actuaolly takes his job seriously (I like the fact that he wears a suit to class everyday-shows hes a university prof not a grad student.)
great!
Terrible terrible prof
Terrible prof! Lost my 4.11 GPA because of him. Something wrong with the way he marks. Do NOT take a class with him if you want to keep your GPA where it's at. If you don't care, then by all means do. But prepare to spend more time on that class than you do any other class and STILL get the worst mark you've EVER gotten.
worst prof
An experienced professor who challenges his students in an attempt to bring the best out of them. The most reading intensive course I've ever taken, and the quizzes are on the most minute details of these readings. I felt that the marking on essays was fair enough, and he was available for help & nice enough to give it when you needed it.
Best class and best prof I've ever had at SFU. Make sure you visit him in office hours during the course he provides immensely valuable insight and resources. My ability to think critically sky-rocketed after taking this course! Highly recommend.
Best history prof at SFU!
Dr. Pabel is one of the most respected Early Modern German History scholars in the world, so it really is a privilege to be his student. That said, he is a very tough marker, almost to the point of unfairness, but he doesn't give tests, only quizzes, which is nice. Definitely not a good professor for your GPA, but worth it for history majors.
It was a relief when lectures wrapped up.
Does not grade at an undergraduate level. I got 15% lower grade in his class than my next lowest class grade. Gives you no room for your own ideas on papers. Really boring class lectures but you had to go for the participation grade. Honestly did not learn anything new or valuable in this class.
Honestly the worst prof at SFU, don not take this course, I needed one history credit to graduate as a 4.0 student and he ruined it all. I do not understand how he is employed. All he wants is students to fail. I can get over the reading and homework, but honestly just help people succeed not fail! On a power trip and just plain rude and unhelpful
It was an absolute pleasure to be Pabel's student. His lectures are captivating; instead of giving you boring details about history, he delved into the culture and mentality of early modern Europeans. His marking is on the harder side, but his comments are really helpful to improve on future assignments. I plan on taking further classes with him.
Dr. Pabel makes a somewhat dry (and very info-heavy) topic (the Reformation) engaging, and assigns various types of papers which keeps it from getting repetitive. He actually uses Canvas(!), gave me technical and historical feedback on my papers, and provides a great syllabus. Really available for asking questions or discussing ideas.
Passionate professor. He wants you to be a better student and makes the material engaging and interesting. He gives great feedback, but its easy to take his comments too personally. He does not mark at an undergrad level, and is definitely the hardest marker In my entire history major. Loved the class, cried over assignments. Lucky to get a B.
Taking Hist 288 with Hilmar was a pleasure. He shows knowledge and passion for the content in engaging lectures. The class is well-structured with no difficult exams, and the amount of reading is reasonable for a textbook-free course. He has a blunt sense of humor which some may interpret as being obnoxious or rude, as per reviews, but I disagree.
Hilmar is an excellent professor. Yes, the way he grades is tough but he spells out his expectations very early in the course so there are no surprises. He also does not give final exams and his tests are not cumulative, so that means less work!
Pabel is difficult but not as difficult as others make him out to be. To succeed you need to demonstrate that you did the readings through your participation; he is not supremely interested in our personal opinions but instead our ability to analyze and apply knowledge from the assigned texts.
Professor Pabel has a reputation as a tough marker but to be honest, it felt pretty in line with what a third year course should be like. He does assign a pretty significant amount of reading, but all of it is accessible for free (or at least was for our class). Participation is important too, but we were given multiple ways to get those marks.
By far the worst History prof at sfu. His ability to teach is very poor and uninspiring to say the least. I will never consider this prof again. Everyone should avoid this prof at all costs.
Horrible prof to say the least. His reputation is as low as it gets.
Don't go to his class unless you've thoroughly lost your mind
I took his class a few years ago. In hindsight, he was the worst professor out of my whole undergraduate career. He has unrealistic expectations, he is rude, and he only cares about himself. Before you brush me off as a petty former student, the class average was a C. Avoid him at all costs.
Class Info
Attendance Mandatory
92%
Textbook Required
0%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
B-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Improving
+0.20 avg changeRatings by Course
322
5.0
(1)HIST231
5.0
(1)HIST212
5.0
(1)HIST263
4.0
(1)HST403223
4.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
106
5.0
223
5.0
HST
5.0
HIST3389
5.0
HIST146
5.0