2.5

Hilmar Pabel

History - Simon Fraser University

2.5
Quality
4.5
Difficulty
46%
Would Retake
110
Reviews
2.5
Quality
4.5
Difficulty
2.3
Helpful
2.6
Clarity

46%

Would Retake

110

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official
110 total ratings

5

15

4

23

3

14

2

22

1

36

What Students Say

It would be great if the standard Hilmar envisions were a reality in public Universities, but it is not

HIST439 - 4.0 rating

If you're not very bright or are lazy, avoid this class

HIS439 - 4.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

92%

Textbook Required

0%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B-

77% confidence
Based on 9 grades
Most common grades:
Rather not say (4)
C- (3)
B- (2)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(3)C(3)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 13 reported grades
Rather not say: 4
C-: 3
B-: 2
A-: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (6)
Tough Grader (4)
Participation matters (4)
Lecture heavy (4)
Gives good feedback (3)
Clear grading criteria (3)
Tough grader (3)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (1)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.20 avg change
Jun
Apr
Dec
Mar
Aug
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

322

5.0

(1)

HIST231

5.0

(1)

HIST212

5.0

(1)

HIST263

4.0

(1)

HST403223

4.0

(1)
+33 more courses
Difficulty by Course

106

5.0

223

5.0

HST

5.0

HIST3389

5.0

HIST146

5.0

Reviews (109)
1.0
5.0
HST105
Jul 1, 2001

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HST105
Jul 7, 2001

No Comments

3.0
4.0
HIST105
Sep 16, 2001

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HIST105
Feb 2, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HIST105
Mar 8, 2002

he went over materials too fast..!! very hard to follow..!!

2.0
5.0
HIST106
Jul 12, 2002

Over-sensitive, close-minded

4.0
5.0
HIST106
Sep 4, 2002

Nice guy, but his marking is ridiculously hard

1.0
5.0
HIST105
Oct 22, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HIST106
Dec 1, 2002

interesting class, but very, very hard

3.0
5.0
HIST223
Dec 10, 2002

crazy teacher, hard marker, lots of readings and zzz lectures

4.0
4.0
HIST223
Jan 30, 2003

Pretty interesting Lecture. Nice prof. But too much reading and hard marker.

4.0
5.0
HIST223
Feb 8, 2003

Iteresting stuff, but he is just way too hard core for his or anyone else's good

2.0
5.0
HIST105
Feb 28, 2003

very hard. lots of reading but mostly an interesting guy. especially when you find out he sings. in latin. enough said.

4.0
4.0
HIST263
May 8, 2003

Great lectures, but too much reading. Exam essay topics can be deadly boring.

4.0
4.0
HIST223
May 14, 2003

Lectures are fun, but quite a hard marker, great deal of material in the course, but not the most I've seen in a 200 level history course..

2.0
5.0
HST
Jul 1, 2003

Very hard marker. Doesn't like late assignments.

2.0
4.0
HST318
Jul 9, 2003

He is difficult to apporach and biased. He has favorites and he is nice to those students only. Very unfreindly and not enough time for students. Bad Prof.

1.0
5.0
HST
Jul 21, 2003

Hard marker, lots and lots of work. Do not disagree with him as this will affect your grade.

1.0
5.0
HIST105
Jul 23, 2003

He was a very hard marker, very unfair and is definatly not someone who should be teaching a first year class

3.0
5.0
HIST
Sep 8, 2003

intellectual snob. During the final he laughed and sighed in disgust aloud as he marked exams as they were being handed in.

4.0
4.0
HST403223
Sep 17, 2003

A quirky guy, lost in his intellectual world, both cynical and playful. Marks tough, but fair. Interesting style, participation based, not much lecturing. You have to do the readings, or else he can get frustrated with the class.

3.0
5.0
HIST3389
Oct 14, 2003

Very hard marker, and a stickler for punctuality. Has unrealistic expectations for in class assignments. Kind of a jerk about it too.

1.0
5.0
HIST146
Oct 14, 2003

DO NOT TAKE A COURSE WITH THIS PROF.IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DO WELL.STUDIED FOR WEEKS STRAIGHT FOR TESTS AND I BARELY PASSED!

3.0
4.0
HIST105
Oct 17, 2003

Rather pretentious - one wonders where he got his quasi-brit accent seeing as he was born in Ontario and educated in the U.S.

2.0
4.0
HIST223
Oct 23, 2003

Hard marker , very intellectual and smart, hates late students, starts class EARLY so be there extra early or you'll be 'late', makes essays worth a lot, lots of reading and enough homework, essay topics difficult but material covered is sometimes interes

1.0
5.0
HIST223
Nov 14, 2003

Hilmar constantly comments on the poor level of writing his students exhibit, but does little to help improve it. His essay marking is unrealistic and not constructive in any sense. Does not sufficiently cover material in exams during lectures

2.0
5.0
HIST223
Nov 22, 2003

I just found that Pabel expected way too much of his students, as well, he expected way too much in term of writing analytical essays. He didnt make this course enjoyable

4.0
3.0
HIST105
Dec 1, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HIST106
Feb 18, 2004

This man is nerdy, quirky, and snobby. He thinks he knows a lot, he is sure of himself, but he is a lousy social scientist. More importantly, he doesn't know how to mark papers. Stay away from this man and his courses. He will ruin your good GPA.

5.0
3.0
HIST223
Mar 18, 2004

I don't know what everyone is complaining about...he may be tough but he's fair and this is University for heaven's sake, not kindergarten. I really enjoyed his class, he's an engaging prof who challenges you to deepen your understanding. i loved his clas

5.0
3.0
HIST106
Apr 1, 2004

If you're worried abour ruining your precious GPA, don't take a class with Professor Pabel. If you want to be educated (and actually learn a little bit about the world you live in), do take a class with Professor Pabel.

3.0
3.0
HIST223
Apr 12, 2004

Not a particularly good teacher, but he knows his stuff and is a *fair* marker - if you write like a 12 year old, you'll fail, but what's wrong with that? His readings are interesting.

1.0
5.0
HIST223
May 16, 2004

Horrendous Prof! He ruined my love of history!

4.0
5.0
HIST223
Jul 2, 2004

Do not take this class if you do not want to work. Some of the readings were boring and some of the assignments were kind of pointless. But if you're willing to put in the effort and learn/red lots then Pabel is willing to help.

2.0
5.0
HIST105
Jul 21, 2004

This proff is crazy. He thinks he knows way- too much. He expects way too much of his students. When you go up to him and ask questions, he only bullies you. He has no right to receive pay from out tuitions when everything he is doing for his leisure.

3.0
5.0
HIST221
Aug 26, 2004

he is unjustly hard.

1.0
5.0
HIST
Sep 7, 2004

This guy is easily the worst prof I ever had during my 3 years at SFU. He has a HUGE ego, and his classes are very boring. His marking criteria is a complete mystery. The workload is also unreasonably large.

1.0
5.0
HIST223
Sep 27, 2004

Arrogant twit who has an ego that fills up the entire room. Doesn't want to hear any opinion other than his own. If you like history stay away from him!

1.0
5.0
HIST223
Sep 28, 2004

Knows his stuff - so does every history proff at SFU. Unfortunately he looks down on students, holds a negative attitude towards them; will favour a select few students; marks VERY hard; and, as mentioned, is very arrogant.

2.0
5.0
HIST223
Oct 18, 2004

He was definately not my favourite teacher. First and last class I took with him. I think he marks you on what he thinks you should get rather than what you should. Put in 1 hr of effort or 10 and no difference. Could have been interesting, but wasn't.

5.0
5.0
HIST223
Oct 22, 2004

Informative, interesting, and clear. Has a bit of an attitude, but overall he's a great prof.

3.0
3.0
HIST106
Oct 27, 2004

Giant glass ego! Every tutorial uncomfortably spent with everyone staring at the floor, avoiding eye contact while he played "guess what I'm thinking right now." Insecure to the point of unbalanced -- attacking the furniture, shouting at the class... What a nut!

3.0
5.0
HIST223
Nov 4, 2004

sooo many papers!!!!

2.0
5.0
HIST223331
Nov 18, 2004

DO NOT TAKE A CLASS WITH THIS MAN! His grading is not based on the work, way to much reading, has favourites, makes fun of people when they go to him for help (He actually laughed at me when I went to him with a question!)

2.0
4.0
HIST331
Dec 17, 2004

worst prof i've ever had, not friendly or helpful at all when u ask questions at his office hrs. boring lecture as well. do not take his class.

2.0
5.0
HIST331
Dec 28, 2004

Absolutely terrible. Think a C is a good grade, and marks accordingly. Likes nothing more than to hear his own voice. He is the German Al Franken...which is entertaining for maybe half a lecture. I'd rather stab myself in the eye with a pen that take another class with him.

5.0
4.0
HIST223331
Apr 15, 2005

Pabel is a good prof, despite the comments below. If you want to take a class where you will be challenged then he's your guy. Lectures+Tutorials are interesting if your willing to do the readings and be involved.He is a hard marker but his courses are worth taking even if your GPA does take a hit.

1.0
5.0
HISTORY331
Jun 12, 2005

Were we in the same class? Prof is rude and condescending to the nth degree. Quite frankly surprised someone has not punched him in the face. Assignments made absolutely no sense and marking even less so.

3.0
4.0
HIST2
Jun 15, 2005

You never get the right answer with this guy. You're only ever sort of right. I shouldn't have told him someone tinkered with his website so it led to a "adult themed" room. At least he was fun to impersonate.

2.0
5.0
HIST105
Jun 17, 2005

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HISTORY
Jun 24, 2005

Prof. Pabel is by far the worst professor I have ever had! While he is incredibly smart and well educated, if you expect to get even a B in any of his classes you are expected to actually be smarter then him. even then good luck. I have never been so dissapointed in a class and a professor. I regret meeting the man. He should be reprimanded by SFU.

5.0
4.0
HST105
Jun 27, 2005

I don't know what you guys are talking about. If you do the work and are enthusiastic, Dr. Pabel is so helpful. He has a great sense of humour. He's brilliant. Yes, if you slack off, and have a hard time with honest marking systems, you won't like him. But if you want to learn and be challenged, Dr. Pabel is number one.

5.0
4.0
322
Jul 28, 2005

a great prof. very organized and engaging.

2.0
5.0
HIS3
Sep 19, 2005

From what I understand, he's a great prof for first year level, but after that he starts to become more and moe difficult. He's a very nice person but definitely not a good teacher. Assignments for the class were basically glorified book reviews where we were expected to recite the prof's personal opinion on the book.

1.0
5.0
106
Oct 9, 2005

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS!! I WORN YOU...AND I'M NOT BIASED, BECAUSE HE GAVE ME A BAD GRADE OR ANYTHING, I ENDED UP WITH A B+. BUT I HAD TO WORK TO THE BONE TO GET IT!!!

4.0
3.0
HIST223
Oct 19, 2005

He's a great guy...but he's a little condescending. Hist 223 is a good course, but you have to work really hard. Midterms are easy, but papers are marked with severe scrutiny. If you ever want a class to laugh in, take this one, especially if you have a retard sitting beside you.

2.0
5.0
HISTORY223
Oct 26, 2005

He is a VERY hard marker.. I made the mistake of taking is 223 in my first year and boy was I in for a shock. You are never right with the guy, he seems like he always has some way to disagree with you. Although he is educated, he is hot-head about it and knows that he knows more than you. Expect hard work and your GPA to take a hit! BEWARE

2.0
5.0
HIST331
Nov 29, 2005

Pabel is absolutely horrible. DO NOT TAKE ANY COURSES HE OFFERS. He even tries to defend his horrible teaching rating on his website http://www.sfu.ca/~pabel/TCV.HTM, anyone who has to do this you know is a terrible professor. STRONGLY AVOID HIM AT ALL COSTS.

1.0
5.0
HIST
Dec 3, 2005

He made a girl in my class almost cry. She was borderline tears after he basically told her that her answer was completely wrong and made her look like a fool infront of the whole class.

3.0
5.0
HIST223AND320
Dec 10, 2005

I first took Hist-223 and did relatively well. Then I took Hist-320 with him... the greatest mistake of my academic life! As a professor he's funny, engaging, and his tests are fair. BUT HE'S INSANELY HARSH WITH HIS ESSAY MARKING. Take his classes only if you don't mind getting a C.

2.0
5.0
HIST223
Jan 8, 2006

As a teacher he is pretty funny and entertaining. But do not take any of his classes until you've gotten your masters degree. He is absolutely brutal on his essay marking and expect everyone to write just like him.

1.0
5.0
HIST223
Feb 3, 2006

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HISTORY320
Mar 1, 2006

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HIST320
Apr 2, 2006

Anyone who feels the need to defend and excuse their abilities to lecture on a personal website has issues. If he was a good professor, there'd be no complaints at all - as it is, he's rated lower than any History prof on this site. He should take a serious look at his ability to teach - we pay you to teach us, not to make us do 100% of the work.

1.0
5.0
HIST350
Apr 23, 2006

No Comments

5.0
4.0
HIST
May 30, 2006

Entertaining, engaging, challenging. A word to the wise: you CAN get a good mark in his class, but ONLY if you can write. I'm good at essay writing, and thus I got an A-; don't listen to those who say it isn't possible. This guy really makes you think, and that was what *I* thought university was for, don't know about the rest of you guys.

5.0
3.0
HIST106
Jul 25, 2006

i took a course with him and thought he was a great proff. i leart a lot and he was extremely entertaining and humourous. but i ended up with a crappy mark. the next semester i took another history course with him. just as funny and knowledgable, just as clear. he expects decent effort, and your grade will reflect how much you gave.

5.0
5.0
HIST321
Jul 28, 2006

A great mind & lecturer. He really challenges you and I too like to think and be challenged. He expects 150% and this means a LOT of work. If you're taking 4+ courses and work a course with Pabel will be too much. But the experience of learning under him is a treat for those who care about expanding their minds & thinking more than GPAs.

4.0
5.0
HIST439
Aug 9, 2006

It would be great if the standard Hilmar envisions were a reality in public Universities, but it is not. I am not encouraged to continue in history, though I have succeeded with other instructors and still have all the interest I had before. In spite of his ability, I can't help thinking that the pedagogue should inspire interest not dread.

2.0
5.0
HIST321
Aug 31, 2006

Prof Pabel is a very intelligent prof, but he has certain ideas and interests and if you don't agree with them, or else want to bring in other ideas watch out! I imagine he'd make a great author but I wouldn't take him again as a prof.

2.0
5.0
HHH450
Nov 29, 2006

Too much busy work, grade not justified could not explain what was wrong with the essay, arbitrary marker

4.0
5.0
HIST450
Feb 28, 2007

Oh yeah he is so hard. He makes you actually read and think about things. He expects you to show up for class prepared and he even expects you to be able to read and write in english.

4.0
5.0
HIST2
Apr 9, 2008

After a short lecture, he just went over the readings. Made the class very boring. I don't learn well by reading, so I'd never take another class with him. When he bothered to lecture, it was fine.. Wish he'd just do that, and not rely so much on readings!

4.0
5.0
HIST288
May 6, 2008

Be warned--his marking scheme is vicious (i.e. unrealistic expectations from students). Don't be surprised by an "F" on one of your assignments in his classes... Shudder...

5.0
5.0
HIST231
May 27, 2008

Great Prof! Very hard marker but absolutely wonderful teacher! Very interesting funny and passionate about his subject. Willing to help but you must be willing to do the work! If you are at all interested in his courses I recomend you take him!

4.0
4.0
HIST320
May 28, 2008

Took both 2nd & 3rd year courses with him. Prof. Pabel is a highly intelligent teacher who takes you seriously and who expects you to take him seriously as well. Readings can be heavy, but you aren't paying uni fees for kindergarten levels. He'll give you an A if you deserve one. Put a decent amount of work in, and you will.

1.0
5.0
HIST288
Jul 5, 2008

If you take one of his classes beware. For tests he asks u 2 write 3 things & gives you 3 1 inch lines then marks them wrong because u didn't explain them, when the quest never asked 4 it.Paper marks r ridiculous, write his opinion & u may survive.

2.0
5.0
HIST320
Aug 2, 2008

I usually take these ratings with a grain of salt. This is one instance where I should have listened. Difficult, uninspiring, and does not lecture but relies, instead, on the Socratic approach. I did not spend $500+ on a course to have students teach me. More interested in his own research than in his students.

3.0
4.0
HIST439
Dec 9, 2008

Good prof but demanding. Do the work and be prepared for class. He does give out decent grades if he thinks you have worked for it. Don't be late to class and pay attention to details on the syllabus. If you ask a question he has already given the answer to or you could have found out the answer yourself, he gets annoyed. I enjoyed his class.

1.0
5.0
HIST439
Feb 4, 2010

Beware. All comments previous to this are absolutely accurate. Extremely tough but not impossible to do well, requires more work than any other class in the dept.

4.0
3.0
HIS439
Sep 27, 2010

Most people who have complained that he is too hard likely expect easy As in university. Thus when they are expected to read and discuss material every week and write coherent and well researched papers they are horrified. If you're not very bright or are lazy, avoid this class. If you enjoy learning and are reasonably disciplined, youll enjoy it.

1.0
5.0
HIS439
Dec 20, 2010

mean-spirited and virtually impossible to get above a mediocre mark. Hilmar seems to relish in his student's misery. he is quick to condensendingly correct any little mistake you madeke and will find any reason to not give you a good grade. avoid.

2.0
5.0
HIST223
Jul 28, 2011

He thinks all of us have only his course to take care of. He imposes pointless ban on primary sources. Plus, he obviously favours some students to others. Unless you're into absurd history or have 1 entire semester just for his one course, avoid at all cost or all your other courses WILL be pulled backward.

2.0
5.0
HIST225
Aug 4, 2011

this is the hardest marking professor i have ever had. he is very rigid in his delivery, and only allows things done one way. he had a 15 minute quiz worth 5% of the entire class grade based on a 350 page book. i would never take a class from this prof again.

2.0
5.0
HIST223
Aug 29, 2011

Ie njoy history, and humanities but I feel like Pabel ruined early modern Europe for me forever. Extremely hard marker on papers and quizzes. Closed minded to new views or concepts, used extremely snobby elitist oxford texts. He obviously is a smart man and has a deep interest in the subject, but your views better be EXACTLY the same as his.

4.0
4.0
HIST320
Dec 10, 2011

Prof. Pabel's class was certainly challenging and required a lot of time and effort, but unlike many other history classes I have taken, I actually feel I truly learned a lot about the course content. He has a lot of knowledge on the topic of European history and his lectures were always thoroughly prepared.

5.0
4.0
HIST212
Sep 17, 2013

Hard marker but extremely nice prof, who is also extremely smart.Knows everything about what he's teahing. Explains things very clearly, and is the type of prof who actually seems to care about the students, and actuaolly takes his job seriously (I like the fact that he wears a suit to class everyday-shows hes a university prof not a grad student.)

5.0
1.0
HIST280
Sep 17, 2013

great!

1.0
5.0
HIST280
Oct 19, 2013

Terrible terrible prof

1.0
5.0
HIST288
Dec 6, 2013

Terrible prof! Lost my 4.11 GPA because of him. Something wrong with the way he marks. Do NOT take a class with him if you want to keep your GPA where it's at. If you don't care, then by all means do. But prepare to spend more time on that class than you do any other class and STILL get the worst mark you've EVER gotten.

1.0
5.0
HIST288
Jan 6, 2014

worst prof

3.0
4.0
HIST320
Grade: C-
Mar 31, 2014

An experienced professor who challenges his students in an attempt to bring the best out of them. The most reading intensive course I've ever taken, and the quizzes are on the most minute details of these readings. I felt that the marking on essays was fair enough, and he was available for help & nice enough to give it when you needed it.

4.0
3.0
HIST320
May 10, 2014

Best class and best prof I've ever had at SFU. Make sure you visit him in office hours during the course he provides immensely valuable insight and resources. My ability to think critically sky-rocketed after taking this course! Highly recommend.

5.0
3.0
HIST320
Jul 1, 2014

Best history prof at SFU!

3.0
4.0
HIST223
Dec 12, 2014

Dr. Pabel is one of the most respected Early Modern German History scholars in the world, so it really is a privilege to be his student. That said, he is a very tough marker, almost to the point of unfairness, but he doesn't give tests, only quizzes, which is nice. Definitely not a good professor for your GPA, but worth it for history majors.

1.0
5.0
223
Aug 3, 2015

It was a relief when lectures wrapped up.

1.0
4.0
HIST336
Grade: B-
Aug 8, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Does not grade at an undergraduate level. I got 15% lower grade in his class than my next lowest class grade. Gives you no room for your own ideas on papers. Really boring class lectures but you had to go for the participation grade. Honestly did not learn anything new or valuable in this class.

1.0
5.0
HIS223
Grade: C-
Mar 1, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Honestly the worst prof at SFU, don not take this course, I needed one history credit to graduate as a 4.0 student and he ruined it all. I do not understand how he is employed. All he wants is students to fail. I can get over the reading and homework, but honestly just help people succeed not fail! On a power trip and just plain rude and unhelpful

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
5.0
3.0
HIS223
Grade: A-
Apr 4, 2018
Would take again

It was an absolute pleasure to be Pabel's student. His lectures are captivating; instead of giving you boring details about history, he delved into the culture and mentality of early modern Europeans. His marking is on the harder side, but his comments are really helpful to improve on future assignments. I plan on taking further classes with him.

Tough Grader
Gives good feedback
Inspirational
5.0
4.0
HIST320
Grade: B
Apr 19, 2018
Would take again

Dr. Pabel makes a somewhat dry (and very info-heavy) topic (the Reformation) engaging, and assigns various types of papers which keeps it from getting repetitive. He actually uses Canvas(!), gave me technical and historical feedback on my papers, and provides a great syllabus. Really available for asking questions or discussing ideas.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
4.0
5.0
HIST336
Grade: B-
Nov 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Passionate professor. He wants you to be a better student and makes the material engaging and interesting. He gives great feedback, but its easy to take his comments too personally. He does not mark at an undergrad level, and is definitely the hardest marker In my entire history major. Loved the class, cried over assignments. Lucky to get a B.

Tough Grader
Gives good feedback
Get ready to read
4.0
3.0
HIST288
Apr 5, 2019
Would take again

Taking Hist 288 with Hilmar was a pleasure. He shows knowledge and passion for the content in engaging lectures. The class is well-structured with no difficult exams, and the amount of reading is reasonable for a textbook-free course. He has a blunt sense of humor which some may interpret as being obnoxious or rude, as per reviews, but I disagree.

Respected
Hilarious
Amazing lectures
4.0
4.0
HIST106
Grade: B+
Jun 7, 2019
Would take again

Hilmar is an excellent professor. Yes, the way he grades is tough but he spells out his expectations very early in the course so there are no surprises. He also does not give final exams and his tests are not cumulative, so that means less work!

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
4.0
4.0
HIST336
Grade: Rather not say
Apr 26, 2022
Would take again

Pabel is difficult but not as difficult as others make him out to be. To succeed you need to demonstrate that you did the readings through your participation; he is not supremely interested in our personal opinions but instead our ability to analyze and apply knowledge from the assigned texts.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
HIST320
Grade: A
Apr 29, 2022
Would take again

Professor Pabel has a reputation as a tough marker but to be honest, it felt pretty in line with what a third year course should be like. He does assign a pretty significant amount of reading, but all of it is accessible for free (or at least was for our class). Participation is important too, but we were given multiple ways to get those marks.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Amazing lectures
1.0
3.0
HIST221
Grade: Rather not say
Dec 7, 2024

By far the worst History prof at sfu. His ability to teach is very poor and uninspiring to say the least. I will never consider this prof again. Everyone should avoid this prof at all costs.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
HIST336
Grade: Rather not say
Mar 12, 2025

Horrible prof to say the least. His reputation is as low as it gets.

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
HIST336
Grade: Rather not say
Aug 4, 2025

Don't go to his class unless you've thoroughly lost your mind

Tough grader
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
223
Grade: C-
Nov 15, 2025

I took his class a few years ago. In hindsight, he was the worst professor out of my whole undergraduate career. He has unrealistic expectations, he is rude, and he only cares about himself. Before you brush me off as a petty former student, the class average was a C. Avoid him at all costs.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

92%

Textbook Required

0%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B-

77% confidence
Based on 9 grades
Most common grades:
Rather not say (4)
C- (3)
B- (2)
Grade Distribution
A(1)B(3)C(3)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(2)
Based on 13 reported grades
Rather not say: 4
C-: 3
B-: 2
A-: 1
Common Tags
Get ready to read (6)
Tough Grader (4)
Participation matters (4)
Lecture heavy (4)
Gives good feedback (3)
Clear grading criteria (3)
Tough grader (3)
LOTS OF HOMEWORK (1)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.20 avg change
Jun
Apr
Dec
Mar
Aug
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

322

5.0

(1)

HIST231

5.0

(1)

HIST212

5.0

(1)

HIST263

4.0

(1)

HST403223

4.0

(1)
+33 more courses
Difficulty by Course

106

5.0

223

5.0

HST

5.0

HIST3389

5.0

HIST146

5.0

Similar Professors