He's been teaching exactly the same course on Search and Seizure for decades. Ultimately, unfortunatly, whatever you discuss in class does not help you 1 iota for the exam. Just stick to reading the casebook, ignore what you do in class, and you'll do ok.

Elements is a ridiculous class where you learn next to nothing of use. Ok lets go over torts and contracts which we do anyways in other classes and then throw in an awful exam that is nothing more than philosophical musings. mr. burns

The problem with this class is that everyone has the old outlines. So in order for him to make it so everyone does not get an A he throws in a ridiculous exam. Good luck trying to figure out what it even says, much less write something on it in a couple hours.

This class made me regret attending UM. Time spent reading, briefing, and studying during the whole semester was a waste. The exam was incoherent & unreadable. It's unacceptable that he is permitted to give exams that do not test one's knowledge or effort because he has his lectures memorized and hasn't updated his syllabus or textbook in 30 years.

No Comments

He doesn't give anybody an A on the exam; if you want one, you'd better hope he "adjusts" your grade for participation. Also, answer some questions wrong in class - it makes him feel smart.

I really hated this class when I took it. I still do. It doesn't help you as a lawyer, it just takes time out of your already busy first year.

he sucks is difficult in class acts like an **** and you don't learn anything from him...i did well though- just don't write any more than teh word limit which is ridiculously small

AWFUL. THIS GUY IS DRAGGING THE SCHOOL DOWN.

he is very knowledgable, but no one seems to have any idea what he is saying over 90% of the time

Elements is a waste of time and money.

Elements is a made up topic that not even the other law professors understand. Going in you should know he grades his test on "feel points." Good luck if you have to take him.

Stotzky is a nice guy away from class, and his lectures are occasionally interesting on some level. An inexplicably strict character limit on the final exam means your entire grade comes down to 2pgs of writing. Its basically just a test in conciseness, which is important, but is way over valued here. I Still have no idea what elements is. boo

Stotzky should not be teaching this 1st semester 1L course. The grade you receive in this class is arbitrary. There are those who have read every case in the and end up with Cs, and those who haven't read a word of the casebook with Bs. 1Ls are better off going to a different law school altogether instead of being forced to take Elements with Stotz

Panders the entirety of class and you will not know what you need to by the end of the semester. The topic itself is infamous in the area. Lawyers who have practiced for years still don't understand the point of this class.

Infamous at UM. Even students from 20 years ago dread him. Pointless class. Final that skips most of the material. Even his Dean's Fellows, blessed souls they were, had no idea what he would test on. Funny sometimes but is clearly losing his memory, often repeating the same stories in literally the same words. Should retire.

Irwin is a not a bad person, and in fact he's quite pleasant generally. This course badly needs to be re-vamped. Irwin is a testament to why tenure should be eliminated and he should be forced to evolve or retire. Absolute GPA killer and you will not learn 1 iota of practice applicable law. Really a shame that this is what UM law is known for.

Honestly, if you have him as your Elements professor, just drop out. He is extremely rude and thinks his class is the most important class, it's honestly useless. There is never a right answer and if you raise your hand to answer his question, he just makes you look dumb in front of the whole class.

In the greater Miami community Stotzky is infamous, and having just taken him I can see why. Doesn't know how to teach and having come out the other end still nobody knows what the class is even about or what we learned. I don't want my review taken down so I will just leave it at that, but he is quite possible the worst 'professor' you could get.

Unable to convey material properly. The textbook that you use, which he wrote, is shocking to say the least. Not sure how he fell into this job. Beware.

The most prominent senior lawyers in the country would struggle on his exam. The class is infamous in the Miami community. If you have the misfortune of being drawn into Stotzky's class, take solace that we have fallen in front of you, good luck.

Posting this now so not accused of bias. He's very political and rambles on and on about things that won't help you learn law. Take someone else if you have a choice.

I have never reviewed a professor, but after sitting through rambling lectures filled with political digressions and stories about how he has proudly annoyed people throughout his life only to take a final focused exclusively on books never mentioned in class, I had to help lower his score, even though he derives curmudgeonly satisfaction from it.

Stotzky is the epitome of what is wrong with america. This self loathing weirdo will spend the entire semester talking about his own personal accomplishments and not teach a single relevant topic. Don't speak in class either because he will bully you. The final exam is a joke. He needs to be let go to make UM Law respectable again!

Worst professor I've ever had. This class is a waste of time and should be taken out of UM law.

This course fell far below the standards of what students at Miami Law should expect, especially given the cost and importance of legal education. Stotzkys is awful. I hope the administration seriously reevaluates this course. Students deserve professors who actually teach in a clear, organized, and student centered way This was not that experience

The biggest waste of time of my life. Every horror story you've heard about him is true.

I struggled to understand the value of Elements. Professor Stotzky often assumed prior legal knowledge and spoke in abstract, philosophical terms that were difficult to follow as a 1L. This made it hard to grasp the material or see its relevance to becoming a successful attorney. This was the only class that seriously made me consider dropping out.