3.4

Jack Shapiro

Mathematics - Washington University in St. Louis

3.4
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
91%
Would Retake
106
Reviews
3.4
Quality
2.5
Difficulty
3.4
Helpful
3.4
Clarity

91%

Would Retake

106

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

32

4

27

3

20

2

18

1

9

What Students Say

The man is a national treasure

CALC233 - 5.0 rating

He is far better than people give him credit for

MATH233 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

7%

Textbook Required

35%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 24 grades
Most common grades:
A (11)
A+ (6)
B (3)
Grade Distribution
A(17)B(3)C(0)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(4)
Based on 26 reported grades
A: 11
A+: 6
B: 3
A-: 3
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (8)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (6)
Respected (6)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (5)
Skip class? You won't pass. (2)
Test heavy (2)
Accessible outside class (2)
Inspirational (1)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.58 avg change
Oct
Apr
Aug
Apr
May
Jun
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CALCULUS2

5.0

(1)

CALCII

5.0

(1)

132

4.5

(2)

CALC233

4.3

(6)

MATH309

4.1

(11)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

131

3.5

MTH132

3.5

CALC3

3.5

CALC1

3.3

233

3.0

Reviews (106)
2.0
3.0
MATH233
Oct 12, 2004

So boring. His New York accent grinds on my nerves after awhile too.

5.0
3.0
MATH233
Oct 15, 2004

Typical math lecturer, but has a sense of humor. Very helpful in replying emails.

1.0
4.0
MATH233
Oct 26, 2004

Horrendous, absolutely horrendous

2.0
3.0
233
Dec 3, 2004

Very boring. Everything is taken directly from the book, but every once in a while I feel like I learn something from going to class. Don't sit in the back row because his handwriting is small, don't sit in the front because he's a spitter.

2.0
4.0
MATH233
Dec 5, 2004

Ridiculously boring, small handwriting (for a huge lecture class) and unclear in his explanations of abstract concepts. His tests can be very difficult too, just adding to the fun.

2.0
4.0
MATH233
Dec 8, 2004

BORING! If you absolutely MUST take a class from him, don't take it in the morning. You'll have no motivation to wake up for it.

4.0
3.0
MATH233
Dec 10, 2004

He's not that bad, and his sense of humor is pretty amusing. Don't take the morning section. He's especially prone to little mistakes during lecture, so remember, "I could be wrong, or you could be wrong!"

2.0
2.0
MATH233
Dec 21, 2004

Goes straight out of the book.

5.0
5.0
MATH233
Dec 21, 2004

don't take out your anger with calculus on him. he is one of the best teachers i have ever had here, even if it was a huge lecture hall. very approachable for office hours, but only if you are prepared with specific questions

5.0
3.0
CALC1
Dec 24, 2004

Ok, I'm not a math person, but I rather enjoyed his Calc 1 class this past summer. I had to work hard to earn my grade, but he was clear lecturer and a fair grader. I actually liked math, which was something of a shock to me.

4.0
2.0
CALC1
Dec 24, 2004

Ummm... I had already taken this class in high school so it wasn't that bad for me, but he is fairly confusing and somewhat boring. He means well and is a nice guy, but the class was not one of my favorites.

5.0
2.0
MATH233
Dec 26, 2004

he understood the material but could put you to sleep trying to explain it. The tests were doable if you study the past ones online.

4.0
2.0
CALC233
Dec 26, 2004

don't go to class, straight out of the book

3.0
2.0
MATH233
Dec 27, 2004

no sweat. this class is easy if you can stay awake! shapiro's a good guy who is human afterall. he doesn't give any tricks and the tests are just carbon copies of the ones year's before. easy to get an A if you have the motivation to go to class!

3.0
2.0
MATH233
Dec 27, 2004

Jack teaches straight out of the book and going to the class is unnecessary

4.0
2.0
MATH233
Dec 27, 2004

A very clear and straightforward professor.

3.0
1.0
MATH233
Dec 29, 2004

Easy, but a boring class. You don't need to attend every single class. 3rd exam was hard.

2.0
4.0
CALC1
Dec 31, 2004

This class was not enjoyable. The lecture was not interactive and not worth going to. It was dry and not motivational.

2.0
4.0
MATH233
Jan 1, 2005

This class was do-able, but not that enjoyable. Professor Shapiro means well and seems like a very sweet guy, but he makes a lot of mistakes on the board in class which makes things rather confusing. He is generous with his time in help sessions, but they didn't really clarify things for me.

5.0
2.0
MATH233
Jan 1, 2005

Pretty clear in explaining exactly what you need to know. Tests are easy, with no tricks or extra difficult problems, especially the final where he eliminated a huge chunk of the harder material and told us what we didn't need to study.

2.0
1.0
MATH233
Jan 6, 2005

Don't even bother going to class, just teach yourself out of the book - it takes less time and is easier than Shapiro's teaching.

3.0
4.0
MATH233
Jan 8, 2005

makes lots of tiny errors in class while giving examples, but does a good job of building up to the next point, so that it makes sense

5.0
2.0
MATH233
Jan 13, 2005

Class wasn't too hard, but was pretty boring. Really helpful in and outside of class, overall nice guy. Clear and sticks to the syllabus and the textbook.

5.0
2.0
MATH233
Grade: A+
Jan 17, 2005

Can't get much better for teaching mathematics. Clear and helpful. Somewhat funny and witty.

5.0
3.0
CALCULUS2
Apr 22, 2005

I love Shapiro! He's very intelligent, and while he does make a lot of little mistakes, they are very obvious and you can correct them on your own. The people who don't like him and think he is stupid for that reason are being ridiculous.

4.0
2.0
MTH132
May 3, 2005

He is a very nice guy. He sincerely wants to help out any struggling students. Make sure to take advantage of the office hours. If you can't make them, he is flexible. Material is easy if you are strong at math, difficult if you are not. Lectures don't help all too much

4.0
2.0
MATH233
May 17, 2005

A solid lecturer. Makes many small mistakes on the board, but they are easy to spot and correct. His good-natured personality makes his sometimes dry lectures more bearable. Exams are pretty easy, but not a total cakewalk.

5.0
3.0
CALC132
May 21, 2005

He used classtime very well so if you just paid attention in class and understood your notes you would do fine in the class.

1.0
3.0
MATH131
Sep 11, 2005

This class was just ridiculous. Shapiro skips around, and isn't focused at all. He's perfectly willing to help, but that doesn't mean you'll get much out of it. He "explained" something to me three times without actually telling me what was going on. He treats his students like the class if merely a review and not intro level. Just bad karma.

2.0
3.0
CALC131
Sep 18, 2005

Shapiro gives off the idea that he has spent his whole life perfecting the art of being completely and utterly boring while making his subject matter dry and seemingly worthless. This class is hard to attend, and takes greater motivation to sit through than to do the actual work.

3.0
3.0
131
Oct 6, 2005

No Comments

5.0
3.0
CALC131
Nov 23, 2005

Pretty good teacher, but classes are boring. You have to do a lot of work on your own if you want to understand it. Tests can be hard, but homework and quizzes help.

4.0
2.0
MATH131
Nov 29, 2005

Very nice man, good teacher who makes things clear. Tests are usually easy.

3.0
4.0
131
Dec 16, 2005

He is ok but not great. Luckily this was a review for me. He didn't seem to emphasize important concepts.

5.0
1.0
MATH131
Dec 15, 2006

Very well organized. Extremely willing to help.

4.0
2.0
MATH131
Dec 18, 2006

decent professor.....subtle humor....not too hard

3.0
1.0
MATH131
Feb 8, 2007

Shapiro is friendly enough, but very dry. Tests are easy, though, and going to class is optional, especially if you've taken any calc before.

3.0
2.0
MATH132
Dec 19, 2008

After about a week of going to lectures, I realized that Shapiro's lectures were totally useless. Really nice guy, but this class honestly would have been no different if there had been no teacher and everyone learned from the textbook.

2.0
2.0
MATH132
Dec 27, 2008

He's pretty bad at explaining things in class. Sitting through classes is a chore and eventually people stop going to them.

2.0
3.0
MATH132
Nov 19, 2009

Does not explain things clearly and is generally not very helpful.

1.0
2.0
MATH132
Dec 6, 2009

Terrible, simply awful at teaching. I completely seriously could've done a better job

2.0
3.0
MATH132
Dec 8, 2009

He clearly cares about his student's grades- he has extra sessions even when not required, etc. However, he unbelievably boring. If I haven't slept for at least 8 hours, the moment he starts talking, I'll struggle to stay awake. Frankly, I didn't learn much from him. Rather, take advantage of his generous office hours- you'll learn much more.

5.0
2.0
MATH132
Dec 22, 2009

He doesn't explain, but he proves - which is great if you're really interested in math. The course material is easy but his lectures are worth going to for his toothy grin, sharp wit, and, of course, his striped sweater.

5.0
3.0
CALC132
Jan 3, 2010

Great class for anyone actually interested in/with a talent for math. He doesn't explain, he proves. Gives key examples in class that come back on exams, so even though it's tempting to skip, don't. Good preparation and light review will get you through exams, and the grading's fair. He's super approachable and easy to talk to. Really good class.

4.0
2.0
MATH132
Jan 10, 2010

For the first few weeks of class, I was turned off by the guy's ultra dry teaching style . However, as the semester continued - after most of the class stopped going - his lectures became more and more thorough. If you understood the examples he worked through in class, you could definitely grasp the material without reading through the textbook.

3.0
4.0
CALC132
Sep 20, 2010

turned on by math

1.0
4.0
MATH132
Nov 2, 2010

unintelligible and while he does prove new concepts he doesn't go over them in any other way. also his examples in class do not reflect his hw. cant stand him.

5.0
1.0
CALC132
Nov 19, 2010

Going to class isn't mandatory since the lecture basically comes out of the book, but he explains the examples in greater detail than the short line or two given in the book. If you don't like his teaching style, there are always office hours where he's very willing to give you his time and attention to go through things step by step. Great guy!

5.0
3.0
MATH132
Dec 6, 2010

Prof. Shapiro is a very nice guy and a great professor. Always prepared for class with lots of practice problems, presents material quite clearly. If he ever made a mistake and someone pointed it out, he'd immediately realize what he did wrong--knows his stuff. Didn't like test format (multiple choice--can screw you over). Good prof, nice guy.

1.0
3.0
MATH132
Dec 16, 2010

I liked Calculus before I took him as a teacher; he only confused me when I had known Calc two last year. He seems like a nice enough guy, but he doesn't explain well. At all.

1.0
3.0
CALC132
Aug 11, 2011

NO. just no.

5.0
1.0
CALC132
Nov 9, 2011

Awesome professor! Never understood why people didn't like him. He basically teaches the book and is very clear. His exams are the walk in the park. Plus he's a nice guy and willing to help you out anytime.

1.0
2.0
MATH132
Dec 5, 2011

He's a boss. Not good at teaching... at all. But a super swell guy. He has a great 'stache as well.

4.0
2.0
MATH132
Dec 11, 2011

He teaches the material well if you go to class. His practice tests are pretty much exactly the same as the real tests with different numbers. If you just use your notecard well this class is pretty easy.

1.0
3.0
MATH132
Dec 16, 2011

He lectures the book, and he doesn't clarify anything. He expects every student to just understand. If you are good at Calc II you'll love it bc you'll never have to go to class. If you are bad, prepare to read every page of that book and to take full advantage of the internet's ability to teach you Calculus.

5.0
2.0
MATH132
Dec 21, 2011

If you're fairly inexperienced in calculus (i.e., no AP/BC calc), his explanations for various topics in the class may leave you extremely confused at first. However, you should do fine if you look over the textbook sections and do the suggested practice problems. He has plenty of office hours if you need help. The exams weren't overly difficult.

4.0
3.0
MAT132
Jan 5, 2012

Not a bad professor, but one could learn plenty by just reading the book, although some of the examples are helpful. Outside of class, Jack Shaps has plenty of office hours and is very willing to meet with students and he also allows a notecard on the exams and practically identical practice exams.

4.0
4.0
CALC132
Jan 9, 2012

Shapiro is an ok lecturer. If you have no foundation it will be hard to understand him. He does have lots of office hours, and if you utilize RPM's and cornerstone you should do fine. His tests are nearly identical to the practice exams, and many MANY problems come from old tests, which are online. Study those and you should do fine

5.0
2.0
MATH132
Apr 4, 2012

He's an ok lecturer, but his notes are really helpful and clear. He makes sure to walk you through the problem and be able to go back and look it over later. Also his tests are exactly like his practice exams so do them! Attendance isn't 'mandatory' but I'd suggest it for the notes.

4.0
2.0
MATH132
Jun 20, 2012

Exams are just like the practice exams. he does a lot of examples and is always willing to explain things outside of class. Can be a boring lecturer but makes the material accessible.

3.0
4.0
CALC1
Aug 19, 2012

A very, very sweet man who is willing to help if you ask for it.

2.0
2.0
CALC132
Nov 9, 2012

Jack is not quite the best teacher... or not quite a good teacher. His lectures are completely pointless and I'm not sure why I go. It is possible to do well in the class with a lot of outside work and the material is not hard but the fact that we learn NOTHING makes it hard! P.S. dont email him.. his response will be less than friendly!

1.0
2.0
MATH132
Dec 19, 2012

Shapiro's lectures are the most boring I have ever sat through. I fell asleep at least once, and I wonder why I attended every class. He is not very good at teaching. Thank god for the guy on my floor who taught me everything I needed to know before each quiz.

4.0
3.0
CALC132
Dec 23, 2012

I normally dont write on these but felt compelled to this time. JShaps gets way too bad of a rep than he deserves. Yeah, he's kinda boring and I might have needed the occasional coffee to stay awake, but his examples are crystal clear and his exams, especially the final, are very similar to the practice ones. Besides, could you teach it any better?

2.0
3.0
MATH132
Dec 30, 2012

Pretty boring class. I recommend reading the textbook before going to lecture since he only goes over examples without really teaching the material. Try to do at least some of the recommended problems everyday, and the practice exams are similar to the actual exams so do them! maybe even twice! Shapiro is nice, just not the best at explaining.

4.0
3.0
MATH132
Mar 4, 2013

Very prepared and organized. Good in class -- great at office hours.

2.0
5.0
MTH132
Oct 13, 2013

Stopped going to class after the first month. His lectures are terrible, he doesnt go over any of the basics at all, basically justs lists down problems and spits out generic ways to do them that dont end up helping out when you see harder problems come test time. and his exams are very difficult, especially for people who are not strong in calc.

5.0
2.0
CALCII
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Nov 4, 2013

He's a wonderful teacher! Though at times, his lecture wasn't the most riveting...he's great help outside of class! And the examples he uses during lecture are super useful for webwork and the exams!

2.0
5.0
MATH132
Nov 13, 2013

If you don't have a background in Calc, Jack is the WRONG professor for you; I know from experience. All I do is the practice exams before each real exam, and have a friend explain how to do each problem. Otherwise, his lectures are pointless and boring, and if you don't know much Calculus, you'll be quite lost.

3.0
1.0
MATH132
Jan 2, 2014

The practice exams are IDENTICAL to the real exams. Just go to the old calc tests and take a few. Quiz questions come directly from the suggested practice book problems. Prepare and you'll be fine.

3.0
1.0
MATH132
Grade: B
Mar 7, 2014

not the best professor but not the worst. material was easy, going to class not necessary. do the practice problems and exams and you'll easily ace this class.

3.0
3.0
L24MATH132
Jun 23, 2014

This class is not so hard if you just study the practice tests before every exam. Shapiro's exams are essentially replicas of the practice tests, so study with those and you'll be OK. He's not very good at explaining the concepts in lecture though, nor was my TA.

2.0
2.0
CALC2
Grade: A
Aug 27, 2014

worst professor I've had. he absolutely sucks at teaching

4.0
1.0
CALC2
Oct 14, 2014

Boring lectures but wasn't a bad class. really helpful during office hours

4.0
3.0
132
Dec 12, 2014

Lectures are a bit boring but also useful. All the quiz questions come from the suggested problem sets and 17-1820 questions on the exams and final come directly from past exams, which are all posted online. Just work through the problems and you'll be fine

5.0
1.0
132
Jan 14, 2015

Shappy is the man

2.0
3.0
CALC3
Grade: A+
Oct 18, 2015

Extremely boring. If you don't take notes, there's no reason to go to class.

5.0
3.0
MATH233
Nov 9, 2015

He's so nice and cute! And if you actually go to class, you learn things, and you can do well on tests. Also, the practice test is basically the real test. If you can do the practice exam, you can ace the test. Also I didn't even buy the textbook.

4.0
2.0
L24MATH233
Grade: A
Nov 11, 2015

He's an awesome guy who genuinely loves what he does. His lectures are generally very interesting, and they are essential to doing well in the class. I know that some other students don't love his teaching style as much as I do, but I think he's pretty awesome. Tests are basically the practice tests with different numbers.

4.0
3.0
CALC233
Dec 6, 2015

Shapiro is an all right guy and a decent professor. His teaching style is very traditional such that he explains a topic, does a small proof, and then does several examples (most important part) explaining every part in gory detail. Some people think he's boring, but the important part is that he explains what you need to know well.

5.0
2.0
CALC233
Grade: A
Jan 20, 2016

The man is a national treasure

5.0
2.0
MATH309
Grade: Incomplete
Feb 25, 2016

Shapiro is extremely nice and really cares about his students. In addition, he provides great lecture notes and practice exams to prepare students for the actual exams.

5.0
1.0
MATH233
Grade: A-
Apr 20, 2016

He is far better than people give him credit for. He has the knack for explaining a topic simply and doing enough examples so that this technique becomes second nature. Yes, his lectures can be boring, but his tests are hella easy (pretty much the practice exams) and seeing him walk in with the cowboy hat just makes my day. This man is a god.

4.0
2.0
MATH309
Grade: A
May 2, 2016

Shapiro is an easy and fair teacher. His lectures are boring but he clearly shows you how to do the problems. You don't really need the textbook since he emails out the homework problems, but I liked having it for reference. The practice tests are super similar to the actual tests (so the tests aren't hard or tricky). It's a pretty cookbook class

5.0
3.0
MATH233
Grade: B+
Sep 27, 2016
Would take again

Great teacher, gives you a practice test before the actual test, and they're very similar. Don't need to go to class, but the optional homework is helpful.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
2.0
MATH233
Oct 27, 2016
Would take again

He is so nice and his lectures are clear and easy. He usually gives examples after each theorem, so I can understand the theorem quite well. Also, his midterms and final exams are very similar to the practice exam given. Don't hesitate to take the class!

Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
MATH233
Nov 2, 2016
Would take again

Shapiro is a boss. His lectures aren't the most interesting, but his cowboy hat and cargo shorts make up for that. His examples are actually really helpful, so going to class helps. His tests questions come directly from past tests and practice problems, so if you work through those you'll be fine in the class.

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
2.0
MATH233
Grade: A
Nov 16, 2016
Would take again

Easy class, clear notes, and clear grading criteria. The exams focus on the concepts that he went over in the class so it's not a problem as long as you study for it.

Respected
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
CALC233
Nov 20, 2016
Would take again

Professor Shapiro is a friendly professor who dives straight into the contrent, without wasting time on remedial matters. His teaching style is affective and his practice tests are actually like the final exam, which makes them very useful in revision.

Respected
Inspirational
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
4.0
2.0
CALC233
Dec 9, 2016
Would take again

Professor Shapiro is very friendly, and though he speaks at you in lectures, if you go to his office hours once or talk to him after class he really will go out of his way to help you. People usually skipped his class which I DO NOT RECOMMEND. The book will not answer everything. Oh, and practice exams are identical to the exam. EASY A.

Respected
Clear grading criteria
TEST HEAVY
4.0
3.0
CALC233
Grade: A
Dec 11, 2016
Would take again

Professor Shapiro is a great professor whose lectures can get drab but have tons of useful examples. Overall he is very friendly and his practice exams are a good way to prepare for the actual test.

Skip class? You won't pass.
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
3.0
3.0
MATH233
Grade: B
Dec 20, 2016
Would take again

Oh, Shappy-J. Between the Indiana Jones hat and his "sweet old Jewish man" demeanor, you wouldn't guess that he had it in him to finesse a few hundred students TWICE in a semester. His notes are fine, but you'll learn better from the internet. The first two exams are the same as the practice, after that, you're on your own.

Caring
3.0
3.0
MATH233
Grade: A-
Dec 25, 2016
Would take again

Not much homework, so your whole grade is basically exams. Not very good at explaining the material and makes mistakes in class, but the tests are relatively easy so it's not to bad. Test difficulty can be really volatile though.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
1.0
MATH233
Grade: A
Dec 27, 2016
Would take again

Honestly Shapiro's Calc 3 class was pretty easy. His tests are VERY similar to the practice test he distributes the week before the test. Much easier than Calc 2.

Respected
Clear grading criteria
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
1.0
MATH309
Mar 7, 2017
Would take again

Honestly love Jack so much; I also took MATH233 with him. Sometimes makes mistakes during lectures, but is always cheerful when amending his mistakes. Tests are never hard and always Very similar to the practice tests. If you have a chance to take a math class with Jack do it!

3.0
3.0
MATH309
Grade: A
May 1, 2017
Would take again

Super boring lectures, but gets the point across. You could easily get away with just reading the textbook and not going to class. He's a super sweet guy, and you can tell he really loves math, but his lectures are just really dull. He's better during office hours though. Also, his tests are pretty similar to his reviews.

3.0
2.0
MATH233
Grade: A
May 21, 2017
Would take again

Took this class and 309 with Shapiro. The tests are basically the practice tests, so getting a good grade isn't too difficult. That being said, he flies through material really quickly and isn't super exciting in lecture. I found going to his office hours really helpful and he's really flexible in making time for students outside of class.

ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
3.0
3.0
MATH309
Grade: A-
Jun 15, 2017
Would take again

The most average professor around, but you gotta love him. His strength is the straightforwardness of his lectures/tests - tests are easy to prep for. Lectures can be a bit dull but they're well organized. HW is reasonable and consistent. Given how poor the math department is here, Shap is a good choice, and matrix is pretty cool.

Clear grading criteria
4.0
2.0
MATH309
Grade: A
Oct 18, 2017
Would take again

Dr. Shapiro is the most boring lecturer in the world, truly. But! He is a fair, consistent, teacher who is straightforward and will never shock you with his tests. If you go to class at least 2/3 of the time, you'll likely get at least a B.

Respected
Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
MATH233
Grade: A+
Oct 27, 2017
Would take again

Easy to get an A: The practice tests he provides are almost identical to the tests he gives (only the numbers are changed). The 3rd test is slightly different but still fairly similar. Attendance is not mandatory and I showed up maybe 3 times during the semester. As a teacher he is good but not great; eager to help students yet is very monotone.

4.0
1.0
MATH309
Grade: A+
Apr 7, 2018
Would take again

Great GPA booster. Although class can be boring most of the times, he merely recites what are written on the paper but if you make the effort to stay awake and listen, you will learn plenty of things. He gives easy tests and the final was not cumulative, one of best things in the word when you have 5 other finals to take meanwhile.

Clear grading criteria
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
2.0
MATH309
Grade: A
Apr 20, 2018
Would take again

nicest professor I have had so far in college

3.0
4.0
CALC3
Grade: B
Aug 6, 2018
Wouldn't take again

I don't know what changed when I had him, but he stopped making his tests were similar to his practice tests. That was true only for the first one. After that, they were all very unpredictable and much more challenging. Tests were all multiple choice, so no partial credit for doing 95% of a problem right but making a small mistake. Boring lectures

Tough Grader
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
3.0
2.0
MATH309
Apr 7, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Professor Shapiro gives boring lectures, but he does cover everything. He is helpful in office hours. His tests are fair. I would not avoid him, but I would not go out of your way to take his class.

Test heavy
Lecture heavy
4.0
2.0
MATH309
Grade: A+
May 10, 2019
Would take again

Shapiro explained everything in a simple and easy-to-understand manner and I feel like I learned a lot. However, lectures were pretty boring. Tests were not hard, but were worth a lot and contained only multiple choice questions. Overall, the class was pretty straight-forward.

Accessible outside class
Graded by few things
Test heavy
5.0
2.0
MATH309
Grade: A+
Jun 19, 2019
Would take again

Prof Shapiro's class is very straight-forward. You can easily understand the material because he gives very clear definitions and a bunch of examples. Webwork was helpful and practice exams are very similar to the real exam. Very kind and accessible.

Respected
Accessible outside class
Clear grading criteria
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

7%

Textbook Required

35%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 24 grades
Most common grades:
A (11)
A+ (6)
B (3)
Grade Distribution
A(17)B(3)C(0)D(1)F(0)A-/B+(4)
Based on 26 reported grades
A: 11
A+: 6
B: 3
A-: 3
Common Tags
Clear grading criteria (8)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (6)
Respected (6)
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS (5)
Skip class? You won't pass. (2)
Test heavy (2)
Accessible outside class (2)
Inspirational (1)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.58 avg change
Oct
Apr
Aug
Apr
May
Jun
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

CALCULUS2

5.0

(1)

CALCII

5.0

(1)

132

4.5

(2)

CALC233

4.3

(6)

MATH309

4.1

(11)
+14 more courses
Difficulty by Course

131

3.5

MTH132

3.5

CALC3

3.5

CALC1

3.3

233

3.0

Similar Professors