3.8

James Blackmon

Philosophy - San Francisco State University

3.8
Quality
2.6
Difficulty
70%
Would Retake
98
Reviews
3.8
Quality
2.6
Difficulty
3.8
Helpful
3.8
Clarity

70%

Would Retake

98

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

41

4

24

3

17

2

12

1

4

What Students Say

Very clear and concise, and entertains a good amount of student response

PHIL350 - 5.0 rating

There are 5 journal entries nd 1 midterm/1 final

PHIL395 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

47%

Textbook Required

45%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 23 grades
Most common grades:
Not sure yet (9)
A (7)
B+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(10)B(6)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(6)
Based on 33 reported grades
Not sure yet: 9
A: 7
B+: 5
B: 5
Common Tags
Respected (10)
Caring (8)
Get ready to read (7)
Skip class? You won't pass. (6)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (6)
EXTRA CREDIT (6)
Graded by few things (5)
Lecture heavy (5)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.28 avg change
May
Nov
Dec
Sep
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL620

5.0

(3)

PHILSCI

5.0

(1)

PHIL205

4.7

(3)

PHIL350

4.4

(9)

PHIL101

4.3

(4)
+8 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL205

3.3

PHIL114

3.0

PHIL325

3.0

PHIL315

3.0

PHIL621

2.9

Reviews (98)
5.0
3.0
PHIL205
Oct 31, 2006

Prof Blackmon rocks! I happen to love Logic, so I totally appreciate the joy he takes in teaching it. He is truely excited by the material, as am I. I would take anything else he teaches!

2.0
4.0
PHIL350
Dec 12, 2006

I went into this class thinking I would like the material. He didn't write much on the board and didn't really emphasize which points were important and which weren't. The quizzes suck because they're always pop quizzes and he expects you to remember some obscure facts from lecture.

3.0
3.0
PHIL114
Apr 11, 2007

I was indifferent towards his teaching method. He gave pop quizzes every now and then which were easy if you attend class regularly.

5.0
3.0
PHIL620
Jun 5, 2007

Blackmon was rad. he was super helpful. the material was almost all new to me, but if you show up to class, he explains everything that he wants you to absorb for the exams and quizzes. office hours are helpful. over all, good class.

4.0
2.0
PHIL110
Jan 28, 2008

This class was easy, only a few tests, the midterm and final were short quizzes. Blackmon is enthusiastic and nice. He holds a lot of open discussions, and very little hw. He is a great professor!

5.0
4.0
PHIL205
Jan 28, 2008

Great teacher. Took Logic from him. He readily answers questions and is open to discussion. His test are super tricky though! He's really specific on his definitions so be ready! Overall if you do the hw and keep up with the work you'll do alright. Fall behind..and well it's pretty much over...

4.0
3.0
PHIL110
Jan 29, 2008

he's a good professor, he improvises lots of his lectures and goes on tangents... other than that, he's very elaborative and very, very good looking

2.0
4.0
PHIL110
May 7, 2008

Do not take this guy's class! He does not give any type of a schedule and makes it hard for people to pass. He gives no update on how you are doing in the class and has no structure to his lectures-I learned nothing! He gives little homework though and is good looking! His tests are extremely hard and tricky.

5.0
2.0
PHILSCI
May 27, 2008

Blackmon is great in Phil of Science, also awesome in Intro to Logic. His coverage of induction is worth taking phil of science by itself. he uses multiple aproaches to the material, chrono, topic, etc. Both primary texts and exegesis, very thorough, take him.

1.0
5.0
PHIL110
Jun 3, 2008

there is no schedule provided and rarely gives feedback that is even remotely useful. Knowing what your grade is or where you stand in the class will be a constant mystery so don't even bother asking because he will never give you a straight forward answer. He is slow to respond to e-mails, unorganized, and very unclear. This class is a joke.

4.0
3.0
PHIL110
Jul 29, 2008

Blackmon likes his job. I noticed a lot of the students found it boring and confusing, but if you're interested in what he's talking about it really can be a cool class. He's a good professor, just try to pay attention.

2.0
4.0
PHIL110
Dec 10, 2008

this teacher makes logic harder than it needs to be. in class he always forgets what he is talking about and/or gives the wrong answer. he is very unclear on the subject of philosophy

2.0
5.0
PHIL110
Dec 16, 2008

This is suppose to be a class for like 1st year students... However I am not I was a 3rd year student and Blackmon made this class waaaaaay harder than it had to be... this could've have been a good course but NO he messed it up

3.0
2.0
PHIL110
Dec 16, 2008

I actually found Blackmon's class to be extremely interesting! He was overall a nice, friendly professor. Didn't seem to be very helpful outside of class, but would answer anything during. Lectures were interesting and exams were easy as long as you'd been to class. I'd definitely recommend him!

3.0
3.0
PHIL110
Dec 26, 2008

This guy is HOT! Not only will you be daydreaming about him in class but he is actually funny! He get embarrassed but I found it super cute. He is a good professor, he gives you a different outlook on the world, take his class, he's easy and is you read the book and attend the class at least sometimes you are in good shape.

2.0
4.0
PHIL110
Jan 23, 2009

This class was way too confusing for me. I didn't feel like we went over the things that he put on the tests.

4.0
4.0
PHIL110
Oct 29, 2009

i have no interest in taking a philosophy class again because of this. it was so confusing! i went to class everyday and still didn't get a lot of it. you like rhetoric and stuff like that i guess this would be for you, but it wasn't it for me

4.0
2.0
PHIL110
Nov 10, 2009

This professor is really nice and cool. He will answer any question you have in class and approaches each student's answer as if it should be seriously looked at. He is really excited about the subject which is a definite plus and the way he presents the material is interesting and most of the time really fun. He's not bad on the eyes either ;)

4.0
4.0
PHIL350
Dec 10, 2009

This class was really confusing, yet interesting. He is SO cute that it makes it easy to pay attention and he will answer any question you have. He is also really passionate about this subject and you can tell that it is important to him that you understand it. Overall, I really learned a lot and will miss him : (

2.0
3.0
PHIL325
Dec 14, 2009

Lots of mixed reviews on this guy which I totally understand. I'm a phil. major, i love this stuff, but phil. of science was not interesting at all. He didn't really make it seem that way either. couldn't bring myself to go to class everyday... lots of talk about logic and critical thinking type philosophy. don't recommend it. Good-looking, though

3.0
1.0
PHIL1
Jan 4, 2010

This class is so boring that most people end up skipping even though he gives pop quizes. He didn't return our papers, so that made it hard to know how I was doing towards the end of the semester. Seeing feedback is the best way to know if I'm really getting the material. Guess I could've gone to office hours. Lost interest by the end of the semest

5.0
1.0
PHIL110
Jan 9, 2010

Professor gives 6 tests. He drops the lowest test out of the 6. If you actually get good enough score, you can skip the last test(final). All his tests are out of 20. There are always extra credit on his test. For me, I received an A easily without taking the final. My tests scores are 14.5, 17.5, 16, 21, 19. With participation as extra credit, A!

1.0
3.0
PHIL110
Mar 7, 2010

Mr. Blackmon is a really nice guy, however he has NO CLUE how to teach. He confuses himself even. I don't even bother listening to him anymore, and he takes his sweet time getting tests back to us. I would HIGHLY recommend aiming for a different professor, someone who can teach, not just "talk"

4.0
3.0
PHIL110
Apr 11, 2010

In the beginning I had a hard time gasping the subject and I was a little worried about the idea of only tests and no homework. But he wants to help you succeed if you struggle. If you actually attend his class and take notes you shouldn't have any trouble getting a good grade. He's a great teacher.

5.0
3.0
PHIL110
May 4, 2010

This class is sooooooo boring. There are five test plus the final but you dont have to show up for the final if you are comfortable with your grade.

4.0
2.0
PHIL110
Aug 3, 2010

Dr. Blackmon is a very smart guy. when he teaches he tends to pause and gets confused sometimes. other than that he teaches clearly, giving papers, going over all the material many times, shows youtube vids and movies sometimes. rarely assigns hw. 5 tests, last one optional if you've done good. highly recommend this class for new students

5.0
2.0
PHIL350
Dec 3, 2010

He's a very smart teacher. Although lectures can seem confusing at first, the book really clears it up for you. He gives simple pop quizzes every now and then, but not so bad. He reviews previous lectures every class, so not missing much. 1 mid, 1 final and 1 paper is most of your grade. Not a bad teacher at all! I recommend him!

5.0
1.0
PHIL110
Dec 15, 2010

He has intellectually engaging conversations and his lectures made it hard to forget the info for the tests. His personal stories are really funny. I actually looked forward to his class. and he's also extremely polite and well mannered.

4.0
2.0
PHIL350
Dec 16, 2010

30% midterm test, 30% essay, 30% final, 10% participation. He doesn't make things difficult. Tested mostly on the in class notes you take. In class quizes just count towards participation grade. As long as you like philosophy it's not hard to get the grade you want.

4.0
3.0
PHIL315
Dec 17, 2010

He's a great teacher. He is always open and willing to help if you show the need to and he gives great, interesting lectures. He has an amazing ability to make everything clear, no matter how complicated it may seem at first. Also, he's SO cute. <3

4.0
2.0
PHIL110
Dec 23, 2010

I got a B- in the class because I couldn't care less about studying for exams. Class was boring, I skipped a few times. Made up my answers by sounding philosophical and I got decent grades on exams. A good guy, maybe not the most interesting professor. Quizzes, final, homework but doesn't check it.

5.0
2.0
PHIL101
Jan 24, 2011

Very nice and makes things easy to understand. Also, very handsome.

4.0
2.0
PHIL110
Aug 19, 2011

You can tell that he enjoys what he teaches, even though the subject is pretty boring. He only gives 4 or 5 quizzes and 1 final. If you do extremely well on the quizzes and receive an A before the final, he will notify you that you don't have to take the final! So I'd recommend that you work hard on all of the quizzes and it'll pay of in the end.

3.0
2.0
PHIL110
Jan 19, 2012

This class was the last of my worries. I skipped class, barely studied and still passed with an A. Gives handouts and goes over them, not really hw. reading is fairly simple. Couple journals,i think 3 exams and an optional final. takes random attendance for points.

3.0
2.0
PHIL110
Jan 27, 2012

The teacher is enthusiastic. He's funny, but sometimes I found class boring. READ THE BOOK AND HIGHLIGHT KEY POINTS! Makes quizzes way easier! He also looks pretty handsome. He is slow on returning quizzes though. I hardly took notes and did bad on the quizzes. Hardly read the book and I still passed. Take the class, read the book= get an easy A.

5.0
1.0
PHIL110
Mar 4, 2012

Going to class will guarantee you a passing grade. He's interesting and easy to follow. And yeah he's easy on the eyes too.

3.0
3.0
PHIL110
Apr 11, 2012

The class is very interesting, but don't take it as an 8am class...it is really hard to focus on all the terms that early in the morning. But Blackmon is a good teacher. He is also really cute! One thing that got on my nerves was he never really makes eye contact with the class. He is always looking at the ceiling or the floor

4.0
1.0
PHIL110
May 17, 2012

Good teacher.Can be pretty boring.Never makes eye contact with class,always faces board or the ground. He's cute,looks alot like Greg Kinnear and has a nice ass. I did not pay attention at all semester and passed with a B so if you pay attention it could be an easy A. Does surprise attendance but he usually has a pattern so pay attention to that

5.0
2.0
PHIL350
May 31, 2012

He is very clear and concise with what he discusses in philosophy of science. If he is uncertain about something, then he will admit it. Incredibly knowledgeable about the material. I highly recommend him.

3.0
3.0
PHIL110
Jan 5, 2013

He is so boring. I honestly disliked his class. Do not take it with him. Seriously, to me he did not know what he was talking about, and his tests, not including the journal you have to do, are completely hard. So many theories & he did not explain them clearly. A group of us will have study sessions & teach ourselves. Not a good teacher/explainer

4.0
3.0
PHIL110
Jan 7, 2013

Wonderful professor, can be boring at times but as long as you focus and take notes, study for the test you will do great. Visiting office hours can be helpful also, i gave his office hour a visit before one of my exams because i was clueless and i got a 19/20 n the exam after the visit. Super helpful, great professor. 3 Exams, drops lowest grade

5.0
2.0
PHIL620
Apr 18, 2013

Honestly, he articulates philosophy very clearly, especially something as vast and complex as the mind. The class only consists of 2 papers and 2 exams. Overall,I would probably take him again and would recommend his teaching style

5.0
2.0
PHIL110
May 8, 2013

His class was fun but dry. His tone of voice makes the class dry. Attendance not mandatory but better if you go so you'll get better grades on quizzes. Not really any notes. Some group work. A lot of talking teacher/students class participation not really required but recommended. Easy class!!

5.0
3.0
PHIL350
May 25, 2013

Very clear and concise, and entertains a good amount of student response.

5.0
2.0
PHIL620
Jun 5, 2013

He was very good at explaining the topics of discussion and answering questions. His lecture style is writing on the board and explaining as he is writing. He does not hand out or post study guides, and never passed out a post-midterm reading list. I suggest going to class and taking detailed notes. Tests are from book and lecture. 2 tests/2 papers

2.0
4.0
PHIL110
Dec 13, 2013

Do not take it with him if you are an English learner (International student or English as second language) because you will find his class difficult. He does explain things well but if you have a hard time understanding English, don't take it with him; he sucks at giving better definition and or clarifying.

2.0
3.0
PHIL110
Dec 16, 2013

The class tends to get very boring. Half the student usually pass out on their desks while he lectures. He seems very dedicated, but the stuff he teaches is very boring and confusing, so missing class wouldn't be a good idea. Not alot of homework, mainly reading. Take good notes, if you're confused (99% chance that might happen), ask questions!

3.0
2.0
PHIL110
Dec 20, 2013

Not organized!

5.0
2.0
PHIL110
Dec 23, 2013

He is a very good teacher. You can get a high score from him, if you study hard and don't skip his class. Even though I am a international student, I got a good grade in his class.

4.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: B+
Jan 8, 2014

Show up to class! He does check attendance. The class tends to get very boring sometimes, but he's a good teacher. Try to take diligent notes during lectures, as some things tend to get confusing. And try to do the assigned readings, as he does apply them to him lecture the day they're due. Put some effort in the class, he'll notice it.

5.0
3.0
PHIL0395
Jan 12, 2014

I had a wonderful experience with Dr. Blackmon. I found him to be interesting, helpful, and very knowledgeable. I would definitely recommend him to anyone.

5.0
2.0
PHIL350
May 9, 2014

Would have given him a 5 on easiness had he not been so attractive that paying attention during lectures became difficult.

5.0
2.0
PHIL350
May 15, 2014

Absolutely adore him! Very clear and steady-paced lectures; provides plenty of notes, diagrams, course tips, and review. Pretty down to earth, and honest about his doubts and knowledge. 2 exams, some quizzes, 1 essay.

5.0
1.0
PHIL110
May 21, 2014

Blackmon is one of the best lecturers on campus. He keeps his lectures interesting and is extremely helpful if you are having trouble understanding some of the concepts. One of the only professors I learned anything from this year. The last unit is mind blowing. If you get an A after 3 tests you don't need to take the final! Very laid back class.

3.0
3.0
PHIL395
Oct 15, 2014

He's literally the most average teacher I've ever had. He's not incredible, but he's not a nightmare. Just sort of there. He needs to get a bit organized though, his lectures can be hard to follow. But overall I'd recommend him, he seems like a nice guy who knows his stuff. He just needs to work on his stage presence a bit!

2.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: B
Dec 11, 2014

Although he is enthusiastic about the subject the lectures feel like they are SO LONG. I have never hated a class as much as this one. I think he should use PowerPoints because he is hard to follow so it is helpful to go to class (he takes attendance). He's helpful if you go to him.

5.0
1.0
PHIL110
Grade: A
Dec 16, 2014

Honestly, Professor Blackmon was an outstanding professor. He is very organized and is pretty much crystal clear on what he wants and expects out of you. He makes it his mission to make sure everyone understands the topic being discussed. Definitely would have him for a professor again.

5.0
1.0
PHIL110
Grade: A+
Dec 27, 2014

James is a genuinely awesome & caring professor. He teaches with wide-eyed wonder and his enthusiasm about the subject is contagious. Class structure is less directed on pedagogical requirements and focused on an overall knowledge of critical thinking. 3 exams 2 hw assignments. TAKE THIS CLASS.

5.0
2.0
PHIL110
Jan 7, 2015

The tests and assignments are essential to at least get a B or so. He explains really well, but can occasionally be disorganized because he teaches at another university as well. Towards the end, he was really understanding and extremely nice. He helped a lot and everything was easy to understand. I would take another class if he taught it.

5.0
1.0
PHIL350
May 3, 2015

He actually took the advice of one of the students who complained a few posts below and started using many PowerPoints in all his lectures! You can tell he does anything in his power to help each student. He provides tips on how to be successful in any class in the syllabus and provides a link to how to become a pro at writing philosophical papers!

3.0
3.0
PHIL0395
Grade: Not sure yet
May 12, 2016

2 short essay hw, 1 midterm and 1 final. there are few pop quizzes randomly mostly end of a topic. these are considered as participation points as he said it wont hurt your grades. the midterm and final consist of 2 parts. one is mc questions and one short essay. he has a ta which sometimes grades hard

5.0
1.0
PHIL0395
Grade: B+
Jun 12, 2016
Would take again

Our ethics of technology class was truly amazing. We had a great time discussing all sorts of complex philosophical issues. Mr. Blackmon is extremely cool and interesting. Participate in the class and ask questions! A few of us were the only ones raising our hands at first, but eventually everyone opened up. Blackmon really is an amazing teacher.

5.0
4.0
PHIL0395
Grade: B+
Nov 16, 2016
Would take again

Took Dr. Blackmon last semester (Spring of 2016) and really enjoyed his class. 3 Journals, 4-5 Quizzes, Midterm and a Final. Power point slides are projected during lecture and are updated on iLearn. Take notes, review the slides and you'll do fine on the quizzes. Be sure to attend class as some information isn't on the slides.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
4.0
2.0
PHIL395
Dec 13, 2016
Would take again

Two journals, a midterm, and a final. He gave out 3 surprise quizzes, but these don't hurt your grade. He posts the powerpoints, additional readings & articles on iLearn. I could have skipped buying the book and course reader because he goes through the key points. His lectures are interesting & he's nice!

4.0
3.0
PHIL395
Grade: B
Dec 16, 2016
Would take again

Professor Blackmon seems like a genuine guy, who truly enjoys his profession. Graded on 1 midterm, a final and 2 journal entries, basically short papers. The class was interesting enough, but asking questions during the course will definitely make it more enjoyable.

Respected
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
4.0
PHIL621
Dec 11, 2017
Would take again

Blackmon is passionate about the subject and teaches with enthusiasm. Do the readings or you'll be lost, he doesn't break down concepts well. Attendance isn't mandatory but a lot of material is covered every class, so don't skip. Graded on a midterm, final and two journals, each worth 25% of your grade. He's nice to look at so thats a plus.

5.0
3.0
PHIL395
Grade: B+
Jan 18, 2018
Would take again

Great class and definitely qualified to teach it. He Might get sidetracked if there are good conversationalists in the class, listen to the audio lectures/assignments outside of class and discuss them with peers, it will help you understand the concepts better.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Amazing lectures
5.0
4.0
PHIL395
Apr 10, 2018
Would take again

Professor Blackmon's class is really lecture heavy but there are a lot of discussions which keep interesting. The tests were mostly true/false and were focused on philosopher's opinions rather than concepts. There are 5 journal entries nd 1 midterm/1 final. He gives harmless quizzes that can boost your grade!

Skip class? You won't pass.
Hilarious
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
4.0
3.0
PHIL621
Grade: A
Jun 3, 2018
Would take again

This class was interesting. I think James did a good job at keeping the class as simple as possible by not getting deep into abstract cognitive science concepts. There only are a few journals and 2 exams which are based on the presentations he does which is based on the books given in class. As long as you study the presentations youll do well.

GRADED BY FEW THINGS
Amazing lectures
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
PHIL621
Grade: B
Aug 20, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Not as bad as I thought. I was honestly dreading a course that consisted of computer science course but Blackmon kept it very black and white and made class enjoyable. As long as you keep up with the reading and journals, you will pass.

Respected
Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
4.0
4.0
PHIL621
Dec 15, 2018
Would take again

He clearly knows what he is talking about and has been at this subject manner for a while. Welcomes all questions and really does a good job of explaining concepts if you ask him twice. Despite his large classroom size and the accessibility you have to him during the lecture, he is a great professor that can teach you a lot if you pay attention.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
4.0
2.0
PHIL621
Grade: A
Feb 7, 2019
Would take again

He's a good man and a good professor who clearly cares for his students' learning. Your grade only depends on two papers and two exams, which you should do well on if you attend lecture, take good notes and study his slides. I just wish his grading criteria for the open-ended questions in his papers were a little clearer. Recommended!

Skip class? You won't pass.
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
3.0
PHIL395
Grade: Rather not say
Feb 10, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Lectures are pretty useless, he just reads the slides when you can read them at home. You're only graded on two journals and two exams, each worth 25% of your grade. There's really no need to go to class except on exams, he posts the slides online.

BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
3.0
PHIL621
Feb 11, 2019
Would take again

-Prof. Blackmon was great, took his PHIL 621 (minds, computers, brains) class, and he had clear criteria from the start. -Its good to come to class gives a good insight into class lectures. -Uses videos to keep students awake and engaged. -Fun questions asked in the required journals. -Come to class and read the material, that it.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
5.0
1.0
PHIL101
Grade: A
Jun 17, 2019
Would take again

this class was easy and he made it so much fun. his practice quizzes are the same as the real quizzes. if you read just what he gives you 100%, you will get an A.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Caring
5.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: B+
Jul 1, 2019
Would take again

Professor Blackmon is very knowledgable and passionate about philosophy and the idea of critical thinking. Highly recommend his class if you're finding credit for a critical thinking course. Really enjoyed his class! Thanks Professor!

Respected
Beware of pop quizzes
Amazing lectures
1.0
2.0
PHIL0395
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 22, 2019
Wouldn't take again

second worst professor i have ever had

5.0
3.0
PHIL621
Grade: C
Jan 10, 2020
Would take again

He grades from 3 exams, 4 journal entries and 1 gets dropped from each 1. Plenty of ec from the quizzes and in class writing because they are not graded unless he likes your work he'll give u extra points. Chill guy always on time, lecture is recorded and posts it up on ilearn so u wont miss a lecture. if u listen to the lecture and read easy pass.

Respected
Inspirational
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
1.0
PHIL101
Grade: A+
Feb 20, 2020
Would take again

Maybe the best prof at sfsu, his worksheets are the same as the exams, pretty nice person too and explains well. I think he has an interesting personality too!

Gives good feedback
Respected
Caring
2.0
4.0
PHIL621
Grade: Not sure yet
Apr 7, 2020
Wouldn't take again

The whole class is filled with very dense information that's hard to digest. Would not recommend the class. I tried reading the book and I feel like you have to be a scientist to understand the material. Not written for your average person. The lectures were the most boring lectures I have ever sat through.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
3.0
4.0
PHIL621
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 10, 2020
Would take again

Professor Blackmon is great; he is caring and kind & cool. the class is interesting if you pay attention.

Respected
Caring
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
1.0
PHIL621
Dec 9, 2020
Would take again

Professor Blackmon is one of a kind. His class is very interesting. His lessons were precise and straight to the point but fun to listen to. His slides were detailed and he put effort into each lesson. A few and easy assignments. Study and tests will be easy. His office hours are always available, if not hell meet outside of them. Answered emails.

Accessible outside class
Graded by few things
Caring
4.0
4.0
PHIL0395
Grade: B
Dec 17, 2020
Would take again

Professor Blackmon is really nice and understanding. He doesn't grade to hard but the exams are kind of tricky. I suggest you don't take this class if you're not in to philosophy. It gets kind of boring. Theres 4 journals and 3 exams that make up the semester grade. Study for the exams!

5.0
2.0
PHIL621
Sep 14, 2021
Would take again

One of the best Philosophy professors out there, he is detailed when it comes to the lectures and just assigns readings majority of the time and some quizzes on occasion. If you miss any class(es), recorded lectures are available via ilearn to catch up on. Overall, I would highly recommend taking this professor.

Respected
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
2.0
PHIL621
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 30, 2021
Would take again

He is very detailed on his PowerPoint presentations. Not much in terms of assignments, he'll assign Journals, Quizzes, and Exams. When taking the exam online, he uses a timeframe, in which for example, he can leave the exam open between 8am-10pm for one day only whenever the exams are scheduled to be taken on. In all, I would recommend him!!!!!!!!!

Gives good feedback
Respected
Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
PHIL0395
Grade: A+
Dec 14, 2021
Would take again

Dr Blackmon is some of the best SFSU has got to offer and believe me Ive been here for quite some time, thats only due to my changing majors all the time. If you need some psych credit or just need to make up a few units, I highly recommend him.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Clear grading criteria
4.0
3.0
PHIL621
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 16, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Professor Blackmon encourages instructor-student communication. He's pretty strict about late assignments, primarily because of his drop-one policy (which drops the lowest exam and journal grade). Nevertheless, reach out to him. It's important to solidify what you need to do well in this course, especially if you need accommodations.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
3.0
PHIL621
Grade: B-
May 18, 2022
Would take again

Professor Blackmon for PHIL 621 was THE best class I have taken at SFSU spring 2022. His lectures are so interesting and interactive with class. If I could take his class every semester I would. Highly recommend! We had 3 required journals and 3 tests (lowest score on test dropped).

Amazing lectures
Caring
Accessible outside class
2.0
4.0
PHIL101
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 10, 2022

This class is okay, there is not a lot of graded assignments making it easy to get a bad grade. The professor talks much of the three hour allotment making the class sometimes unbearable to sit through. He is nice though and clearly cares about the subject he teaches.

Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
PHIL0395
Apr 16, 2023
Would take again

So far, we have had 1 test and 1 homework assignment, so you're screwed if you don't do well. Pls take those seriously bc it's looking like will only have 2-3 tests and 2-3 assignments in the grade book. The test was average difficulty and the 1 assignment was easy. I would rec his class to ppl who don't like a lot of homework! really nice guy too!

Caring
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
3.0
3.0
PHIL621
Grade: A-
May 9, 2023

Do not take this class asynchronous. The way he explains concepts in the is super super confusing, but he is willing to help you during his office hours. The exams are straightforward, and the journals are lengthy. Honestly he's behind on grading and your grade percentages aren't shown, so it's difficult to prepare for upcoming exams.

Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
PHIL621
Grade: A
Nov 4, 2023
Would take again

This class has a ton of great info and you'll learn a lot about "Minds, Brains, and Computers". Fair grader, everything is done by the book as laid out in the syllabus. The online format was convenient. Lectures on point. A few test questions were hard to understand but he gives you some extra points for basic stuff. Nice too.

5.0
1.0
PHIL395
Grade: A
Dec 5, 2024
Would take again

He is very understanding. Is always encouraging students to share their opinion and makes sure to validate whatever opinions were said and is a gentle corrector. He gave us some grace during the election which I appreciated very much. Lectures are more discussion based. Make sure to take notes, it's easy to miss some things. Overall great professor

Caring
3.0
3.0
PHIL110
Grade: Not sure yet
Sep 29, 2025

I would not say that he is a poor professor, but his Canvas is updated sparingly, manual grading is slow, and there are so few assignments that each one is weighted significantly. The lectures are a bit lengthy. It is not an incredibly difficult course, but may not be suitable for students that like to plan ahead and prepare as much as possible.

Participation matters
Lecture heavy
2.0
3.0
PHIL395
Grade: B
Nov 13, 2025

You would think “Science of Ethics and Technology” immerses itself in ethical dilemmas in a wide range of concerns like the growing concern of AI technology. Unfortunately this course ONLY concerns itself on reproductive technology. It would b ok IF THE COURSE WAS LABELED SO. Lectures become boring, realizing it would be the only topic discussed.

Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
PHIL0395
Dec 11, 2025

hes not a bad teacher, setup of the course isnt very good, up until literally a week ago we only had 2 things in the grade book, it was exams, extra credit with every exam which is nice, sprung a group project on us with less than 3 weeks in the semester and the project is due 2 days b4 final exam is due, lowest exam score dropped, not totally bad

EXTRA CREDIT
Graded by few things
4.0
3.0
PHIL205
Grade: A
Dec 20, 2025
Would take again

Solid professor. Took his formal logic class online. He teaches out of a Paul Teller text. Would be 5 stars if he conducted class in-person.

Participation matters
EXTRA CREDIT
Graded by few things
3.0
2.0
PHIL110
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 21, 2025

The course was very easy with not much work to do. There are 3 exams and extra credit opportunities with them. The professor doesn't grade frequently and so far has not graded anything but the extra credit from the first exam. I would not recommend this professor for someone who likes to plan ahead and know what their grades are looking like.

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

47%

Textbook Required

45%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 23 grades
Most common grades:
Not sure yet (9)
A (7)
B+ (5)
Grade Distribution
A(10)B(6)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(6)
Based on 33 reported grades
Not sure yet: 9
A: 7
B+: 5
B: 5
Common Tags
Respected (10)
Caring (8)
Get ready to read (7)
Skip class? You won't pass. (6)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (6)
EXTRA CREDIT (6)
Graded by few things (5)
Lecture heavy (5)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.28 avg change
May
Nov
Dec
Sep
Nov
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

PHIL620

5.0

(3)

PHILSCI

5.0

(1)

PHIL205

4.7

(3)

PHIL350

4.4

(9)

PHIL101

4.3

(4)
+8 more courses
Difficulty by Course

PHIL205

3.3

PHIL114

3.0

PHIL325

3.0

PHIL315

3.0

PHIL621

2.9

Similar Professors