3.4
Quality3.2
Difficulty41%
Would Retake87
Reviews41%
Would Retake
87
Reviews
Rating DistributionOfficial
5
21
4
24
3
18
2
20
1
4
What Students Say
“Grade 100% depends on TA”
HIST2340W - 2.0 rating“Grade hinges on your TA, I didn't think it was too bad”
HIST2340W - 4.0 ratingClass Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
17%
Textbook Required
29%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.97 avg changeRatings by Course
HIS181
5.0
(1)HIST181
5.0
(2)DIPLOMACY
5.0
(1)HIST282
5.0
(1)HIST297
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
HIST2340
4.3
2340
4.0
DIPLOMACY
4.0
HIST282
4.0
HIST101
4.0
Reviews (87)
Amazing lecturer. He is the authority on the Cold War. He founded the Cold War Project, and has written numberous articles and books. This guy is the man!
Very knowledgable professor, good lecturer. Not the easiest class, large reading load, large lecture size very unfortunate. Overall good class.
Very clear, very good lecturer especially on his subject, the Cold War. He's a world-class expert on the matter and this doesn't stop him from being able to easily transmit this to students.
He is the smartest professor I have ever had. He knows everything, but expects you to learn it all. It was a difficult course, but I really enjoyed it. I'd still take him, at least once.
Meh. Midterm was mostly definitions of terms he pulled from the book, some of which were really randon [he pulled one term from a photo caption]. Looks like the guy from Honey I Shrunk the Kids.
He certainly knows what he is talking about. Very helpful when being signed into class. TA grade papers and exams and are also very helpful.
Prof more interested in useless details of a 40 year old memo than anything of interest to a non-historian.
He lectures in grad. classes and seems more interested in hearing his own voice. However, He is truly knowledgeable in his field, and is very approachable. I feel he decides if you are smart enough and only then invests in you. Best Cold War professor at GWU. Independent studies is the best way to go though, if you know what you want to research.
Don't expect a GPA boost from this class. But you learn a ton. TONS of reading. Tests are straightforward. He knows it all - seriously. Very personable, and despite the class being him talking the whole time, it's intersting stuff and he'll gladly go on a tangent if you're wondering about something specific. Take this class if you want to learn.
Took his Cold War History class in 2001 -- not for lightweights. You've got to take the paper seriously, and be nearly ready to become a full-fledged historian. But if you are willing to work hard to do a buttload of research, you will be rewarded. He does have fascinating stories to tell.
Well, I have mixed feelings. To me, the class was incredibly easy - as evinced by my falling asleep, frequently, during lectures. The reading is utterly irrelevant for the most part - show up and take notes if you need to, because that's what you'll be tested on. As a result, the "daunting" reading list is manageable. Bonus: very fun lecturer.
Best professor I've had at GW. Prof is so interested in topic and well-versed... it really comes across in his lectures. Beware of LOTS of reading and do your best not to miss class b/c you will miss a lot of material.. but if you are willing to do the work, this will be a GREAT class for you. (It helps if you are pretty interested in the topic)
eeeehhhh. he's okay. Lectures often veer off on random tangents that make you wonder why you came to class. Enthusiastic, but clearly likes to listen to himself speak. Kind of your typical academic.
Knows too much for his own good. He gets off track easily. Lectures are mostly guided reading. Does tell a few good stories like meeting Castro. He does not know how to teach a WID. Still have a final even though you have 3 papers stacked ontop of each other. There is also alot of reading
he's very smart but has a somewhat annoying way of lecturing and likes to ramble. he's grown on me though. i agree that it doesn't make for a good WID class. also not very helpful in preparing for the final
He is a fun professor who is a good lecturer, and the information is really interesting, but he refuses to give his students any help what so ever. The class is disorganized, he goes on tangents there is so much detailed information that it is impossible to know what you have to know and what you don't. three papers and a final-not an easy class
Good lecturer, though he works a bit slower than the syllabus. Very knowledgeable about the class topic. For a WID, not too much writing (5, 5, and 10 pages per paper). Final exam covers the whole course, but it wasn't any harder than your average exam. Reading isn't excessive, but going to lecture covers most of it and makes it easier to absorb.
nice guy, but hated his lecture styles.he knows history very well, but he could not keep my attention. dont take him unless you need to. he is all over the place, goes off topic onto tangents that take up the majority of the class. he actually pushed the syllabus back so far we got rid of about 30 years of hist. cuz he didnt get to it.
fair professor. I learned a lot about the cold war. He certainly knew his stuff
Why is Hershberg rad? 1. Brilliant lectures. Really! I don't fall asleep! I learn! It's great. 2. If you go to class and do a marginal amount of reading, the test= breeze. 3. We watch Dr. Strangelove 4. He brought in a piece of glass crystalized from the first atomic bomb test that he got from rummaging through Conan's stuff. Enough said.
Awesome Professor. I learned a lot and still manage to be stress free of grade. He is very helpful and knowledgeable in his subject. You should attend all his lecture and take detail notes. You grade will definitely based on your effort.
Int'l History of the Cold War was a very interesting class, taught by a very interesting professor. He is quirky and funny, attendance not necessary, reading not really necessary (except for when writing a paper), if you try hard on the papers and study for the final and midterm you will receive a good grade.
Extremely disorganized lectures and tends to go on rants, also repeats textbook. Texts are by same author and are redundant. Prof is smart and knows history, but his bad lectures, uncaptivating vocal tone, and generally disheveled appearance make it hard to take him seriously. Take it if you LOVE the cold war and can handle a mediocre experience
Do not take this class unless you have a huge interest in the subject. It's not so much that the professor is bad.. he knows his stuff (although his lectures are all over the place and confusing). It's the TA's and their role in your final grade. For an introductory course, Hershberg has the TA's grade like your a grad student.
great professor who's an expert in the field, he made me wanna go to lecture bc he tells history like he was there himself and has so much inside info and funny side stories. (he met castro i.e.) definitely a great class for history lovers, esp cold war. you have to be lucky with the TA, like I was, got a straight A on everything.
AMAZING PROF! Actually go to lecture and listen to him thats all you really need! He is incredibly interesting (and I was not initially that interested in the topic). Easily the best class I have taken at GW.
Does he give a study guide for the final exam???
This man is a walking encyclopedia. One , if not the most knowledgeable professor I have ever head. Three papers - two 5pagers ,one ten pager , no midterm ( it was a wid) yet a culminative final without a study guide. If you attend class, take notes and do the readings you'll have no problem passing the class. defiantly recommend it
He's very intelligent, but his lectures are all over the place and he doesn't use any powerpoints! Your grade depends on your TA completely
Diplomatic History---he talks a lot. Obviously a genius in that he can talk with no notes, but he sometimes goes back, restarts, or just speeds through. He is a mega genius though who concentrates on the Cold War, so I now know ALL about it! :)
I took History of the Nuclear Arms Race with him and he's truly an incredible professor! His lectures are really interesting, because he knows SO much (Harvard, Columbia, Tufts... need I say more?) and he's literally telling the story as if it's his own life story... he's also really funny. He only has a midterm, a paper and final, take this class!
For a WID class, the final exam is worth 40% of your final grade- so you tank that and youre done for. Also, there are 10 books for this class. And you read them all in their entirety. I wouldn't really recommend this class.
This guys knows his stuff, very well-read! I talked to him after class about how he had lunch with Castro one time, which is pretty cool. He appears a little disheveled, but the course is organized, interesting, and not too difficult. Don't need to read all the books, but be friends with Wikipedia and go to class/take good notes
Hershberg is super knowledgeable and very passionate in teaching the class. However, his lectures are all over the place and it was impossible to take notes. However, if you do attend lecture and take good notes, there's no need in doing the readings. He assigns A LOT of the readings. Grades are solely based on your TA. 3 essays, one final.
This guy knows what he is talking about. He has the gift of turning history into an exciting and absolutely fascinating story rather than just boring dates and facts. My advice: GO TO THE LECTURE AND TAKE NOTES ON LITERALLY EVERYTHING HE SAYS. You don't need to do a lot of the reading if you take good notes. He explains everything well in class.
Easily one of the best professors I've ever had, and definitely one of the most informative, interesting, and enjoyable classes I've taken. Go to every class and just listen and take amazing notes - the material is fascinating and he's a fantastic professor. Excited to take another of his classes.
Hershberg is an amazing lecture! a bit long but his passion makes it tolerable. I spent so much time focusing on the papers I didn't get to read as much. go to lecture and contribute when you can- he loves it! and will always remember you. the final was hard but if you do decent on the papers it can balance out your final grade to a solid B.
Felt compelled to do my first RMP rating for Hershberg. He wins the award for having the best attitude; his passion for history and pleasure for teaching makes his lectures memorable. Lectures can sometimes be hard to follow; but it's history and can't really be told in powerpoints and bulletpoints.
Professor Hershberg is one of those professors who knows their subject inside and out. This is a blessing and a curse. On one hand, if you ever have a question about a really obscure part of US Diplomatic History he will more than likely know the answer off the top of his head. On the other hand, his lectures are circles and there is no study guide
No powerpoints to help condense everything that was discussed, very all over the place. Also he does not tell you what's on the final and gives no hint what the terms could be for id's in over 100 years of history. Lot of reading.
So here's the deal with Hershberg: he's a super brilliant historian but not a great teacher. No lecture slides and a pretty unorganized class. He does lectures without any notes (which is pretty amazing) but that left a lot of students confused and lost during lecture. Hard class to take notes for. Final is 40% of the grade.
Hershberg is a fascinating professor. He knows an unfathomable amount of information - he constantly name drops. He's met Fidel Castro. His lectures can get a little circuitous and confusing sometimes, but honestly he's a captivating speaker and worth it. Grade hinges on your TA, I didn't think it was too bad. Final is relatively general info.
You never have to go to lectures if you read and know history. But he is extremely smart just hard to follow in the slightest. Grade 100% depends on TA! TA defines this class for you, Hershberg doesnt grade anything or even attend the final.
Hershberg is a great storyteller but not an excellent teacher. Your TA really defines the course and helps you cut down the thousands of pgs of reading that the prof assigns. The class was great for Cold War foreign policy and fun factoids and it was a super easy WID (just 3 papers, 20 pgs total!)
When it comes to nuclear/cold war history, he's knows more than most in the business. Lectures can be hard to follow (he doesn't use notes or powerpoints) but pay attention and you'll be fine (take notes!). For diplo he uses TAs, but for nucl history he grades, and is fairly lenient (but doesn't give much feedback). A very nice and passionate guy.
Professor Hershberg is VERY passionate about nuclear history. He can sometimes go off topic when lecturing. He could be hard for an IF major because he doesn't use slides and just talks. However, he is very knowledgeable and lectures relatively well. The papers are graded by your TA, so try to get a good one!
He's super passionate but very hard to follow and his lectures are all over the place. If you don't read, you have to go to class, or read and don't go to class. I would recommend not reading (because the amount he assigns is insane) and just paying a lot of attention in lecture
My absolute favorite professor at GW. Incredibly brilliant, very engaging, and super experienced. He has great stories and he inserts them into his lectures. I took both his nuclear history class and his diplomatic history class and loved them both. Papers were manageable and you use all primary source materials. Absolutely amazing. A MUST TAKE.
Interesting class/intelligent professor. But outside of class he is not approachable, or friendly. He ignored numerous emails sent by students. So you if you need advice on the papers you will have to ask your peers. He shows no interest in helping students. I was interested in this area of history, but wont take any course again with him.
Prof. Hershberg's course is probably one of the most engaging and worthwhile one I've taken at GW. (I'll be taking his diplo history class next semester!) His lectures are fascinating enough to want to be there, which is great because the midterm/final rely on what he says in lecture. Take lots of notes on everything he says, lol
US Diplomatic History with Professor Hershberg is probably the best course Ive taken so far at GW. His lectures were so engaging I couldnt be distracted at all during class, and at the end of the semester everyone gave him a standing ovation! Incredibly writing-intensive, but thats to be expected with a WID.
Prof. Hershberg is a highly-respected scholar and leading expert on the Cold War, and nobody can deny his raw intelligence. That said, his lectures are often-disorganized, he provides minimal if any outlines or study guides aside from the textbook, and the TAs are 100% responsible for grading. Also, outside of class, he is NOT a social butterfly.
Really great guy. Sometimes he can be helpful outside of class, other times not so much. Extremely knowledgable, never has lecture notes and only reads directly from something when he's quoting it verbatim. Not a difficult grader, if you study and use good details you should do fine on exams.
Prof. Hershberg is clearly incredibly knowledgeable and one of the leading experts in his field, but that doesnt mean you should take his class. Engaging but disorganized, his lectures use virtually no reference materials outside his stream of consciousness, his exams are brutally difficult, and he is not approachable/helpful outside of class.
I want to give him a better rating cause he is a meme but his lectures are awful (sorry.). I am a history major and Diplo was so confusing with 0 structure. The grading of papers are very dependent on the TA. He makes you get like 10-12 books which just seem excessive waste of money, share the books!
Lectures are awful and unorganized. I would recommend skipping lecture, reading the textbook, and going to discussion if you have to take the class. We had to buy several books that we didn't even use. Grading depends largely on your TA. Prof. Hershberg is very respected and passionate, but this class could function fine without him.
I have taken multiple classes with Hershberg--he's one of the best professors I've had at GW. He's totally brilliant and really drives home the importance of learning history so we can better understand the present. He will also teach you a huge number of facts in incredible detail. If you're a history or IA major, this is a must-take!
He is Michael Brown for Intro to International Affairs, this is him on steroids. He stands up at the front of the class with no visual aide and is not very accessible outside of class. The TAs do most of the grading. He is really funny and his stories are interesting but it is really hard to follow in his class and it can be a lot of work and read.
It is really easy to fall asleep during his lectures so I never went after the first month and i still ended with a B. He assigns a lot of reading but my TA gave me a shorter list to read so its not necessary to read everything he assigns. Do the readings and do well on the essays and you'll be fine even if you don't go to class.
James is an amazing dude who clearly knows everything there is to know about nuclear history. My biggest complaint was the lack of organization in the course. He lectures from memory for the entire class so you can't really decipher whats important for later. Wish he clearly showed us what was important to know so we were better prepared.
Professor Hershberg is a history expert. However, his lectures are tedious & hard to follow because there are no slides, so it's hard to stay organized or pick out the important information. 3 papers + one final exam, all graded by your TA.
Hershberg's ability to teach in this class is limited by which TA you get. His HIST3334 class is much better structured. It was a slog to get through this class, especially online, where Hershberg lectures are content-packed with information that is interesting and useful for the assignments. Take him if you absolutely love the Cold War.
Hershberg is nice, sure, and knowledgeable. But at the end of the day, having a disorganized lecture all online without even one slide is what really killed me in this class. Pointless for me to show up to lectures so I didn't (have an A- average at this point). Make sure you pick a really nice and helpful TA because they do all the grading.
Prof Hershberg is extremely knowledgeable and his lectures are full of great info. In order to do well you have to do at least the readings of the main textbooks, however, your grade will depend more on your TA since they grade all your papers and final exam. Good choice for IA majors or anyone who enjoys history.
James Hershberg is incredibly knowledgable about the Cold War, however this class is awful. The readings are too long, like we're talking 400 pages for just one class. The midterm is worth 25% of your grade, a 10 page paper (that he only mentioned the week before it was due) is 25% and the final is 50%. His lectures are so disorganized. Avoid.
Extremely knowledgeable and experienced in the Cold War field, and a pleasure to learn from. However, the reading is just too much and it is difficult to take notes simply being talked at. Also largely unavailable outside of class and the final is worth 40% of your grade. Proceed with caution but highly recommend if you love Cold War history
Professor Hershberg is an intelligent and passionate historian. He knows a lot of things about the class subject, but he is not the best teacher. Sometimes his classes are a little dry, and he does not use slides to make the classes more digestible. Class is graded by the GAs and if you read and just attend the discussions you will be just fine.
Very passionate and intelligent historian. If you are taking this credit for IA, then you will love this class. The readings were fun, but often long. However, as long as you go to his lectures and the discussion sections, you can pretty much learn everything you need to for the papers and final exam.
Hershberg probably knows everything about the Cold War. Consider that. His lectures are kind of hard to follow (no outline or slides) and become more of a chore to go to, but he's funny and knowledgable. Grade depends on TA - go to discussion (2 papers, 1 final, + participation make up your grade). IA majors have to take this but just push through
Professor Hershberg is an immensely intelligent man who lectures off the cuff for an hour and fifteen minutes each day without missing a beat. If you do not attend you will not get anything out of the course. Alongside this, if you are not passionate about Cold War history you will likely be very bored. It is an amazing course and taught well!
It's clear he cares a lot about the topic, but his lectures are difficult to follow. No powerpoints, all he does is monologue with no general structure. Makes it hard to stay engaged with class.
Prof Hershbeg is clearly knowledgable and is accomplished at research but is simply not a good professor. His lectures without slides or stopping the entire time, doesn't follow the syllabus, and assigns wildly unreasonable amounts of reading (entire books for one class).
Midterm 25%, 10 page paper on primary sources research (very heavy) 25%, and simply a 50% final exam in person based on concept definitions and short essays. Classes are a mess, no slides, no logic, if you have another option, choose that.
Midterm and 10pg paper are 50% of your grade, final is the other 50%. He doesn't use Blackboard so you have no idea what your grade is until the semester transcript comes out, literally. Very harsh grader, in person on paper exams, a LOT of memorization (terms, dates, names, etc).
DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS! Hershberg is an atrocious professor with worse lectures. It's a shame because he's super intelligent and I would love to listen to him talk about the Cold War outside of class, but his class is the worst one I've taken at GW. Grade is dependent on your TA, and they can be really harsh. Got an A, but ABSOLUTELY not worth it!
Grade is completely dependent on TA, professor is awful. No slides, just stands and rambles all class.
Hershberg is a cool guy and an extremely learned historian, but U.S Diplomatic History as a class is almost totally pointless. Attendance is not mandatory and he just repeats what's in the textbook in his slideshow-less lectures. Everything is graded by the T.A: make nice with them, and attend discussion, and you'll do fine.
Hershberg is knowledgeable and passionate, but lectures are awful. No clear structure and no slides ever, many just skip class and do the readings which are all online. 2 papers graded by TA, the 2nd paper is denser and harder but very interesting. Haven't taken the final (essays and IDs) yet but seems scary. Talk in discussions then theyre easy
prof hershberg follow the syllabus challenge IMPOSSIBLE EDITION
Hershberg is a super passionate guy and his lectures are like story times. There's no notes but they follow the textbook, so use that to supplement. The course is graded by GAs, with two papers (the second is pretty hefty) and a final exam which is ID terms and two essays. If you love Cold War history, you will definitely enjoy.
Professor Hershberg is undoubtedly a knowledgeable historian, but his teaching style leaves something to be desired. He doesn't utilize lecture slides, so classes consist primarily of listening to him. To succeed, be sure to read the textbook before each lecture to better grasp the material. In terms of grading, it largely depends on your TA.
Try to take this with someone else. You can power through but the lectures are useless. Grade is entirely dependent on your TA.
Like many history profs, there are no powerpoints and notes are taken off of his narrative of the Cold War, which is difficult to get used to at first. However, he's very knowledgeable and creates a story out of his lectures. LOTS of reading. Graded off of a paper, writing-based midterm, and final. Movie review extra credit opportunity possible
Hershberg loves nuclear history. He would marry nuclear history. No presentations w lectures, doesn't take attendance but gets sad if its really low. Grade: 25% midterm, 25% 10p paper, 50% final. tests are IDs and 1 essay. Readings aren't necessary, lectures are dense but funny. If you're an okayish student, you'll enjoy his stories (lectures).9/10
He's passionate about the cold war. Easy grader.
Hershberg is a very knowledgeable and super-respected guy, and he's always really energetic and excited about the subject. But his classes are lecture heavy (NO SLIDES) and he talks about absurdly niche things that aren't relevant to the papers or tests. My TA was great though so it ended up fine.
Lectures are optional, go to your discussion. Like, I get it's hard to teach a 200-person history class, but come on. No slides, no writing on the board, puts up a picture of whoever is president at the time and rambles for 1 hour 15.
Class Info
Online Classes
100%
Attendance Mandatory
17%
Textbook Required
29%
Grade Predictor
Your expected effort level
Predicted Grade
A-
Grade Distribution
Common Tags
Rating Trend
Declining
-0.97 avg changeRatings by Course
HIS181
5.0
(1)HIST181
5.0
(2)DIPLOMACY
5.0
(1)HIST282
5.0
(1)HIST297
5.0
(1)Difficulty by Course
HIST2340
4.3
2340
4.0
DIPLOMACY
4.0
HIST282
4.0
HIST101
4.0