2.3

James Ketchen

Law - Laurentian University of Sudbury

2.3
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
65%
Would Retake
86
Reviews
2.3
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
2.3
Helpful
2.3
Clarity

65%

Would Retake

86

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

14

4

11

3

8

2

10

1

43

What Students Say

He's a very nice and easy going prof

REASONING - 4.0 rating

I've done well in a few of his classes

JURI - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

32%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 19 grades
Most common grades:
B+ (6)
A- (5)
A (3)
Grade Distribution
A(4)B(3)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(11)
Based on 19 reported grades
B+: 6
A-: 5
A: 3
B-: 2
Common Tags
Gives good feedback (5)
Hilarious (4)
Accessible outside class (4)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
Tough Grader (3)
Respected (3)
Caring (3)
Get ready to read (2)
Rating Trend

Improving

+1.03 avg change
Nov
Jan
Mar
Dec
Sep
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

SEVERAL

5.0

(1)

REASONINGNLA

5.0

(1)

UPPER

4.0

(1)

LEGALR

4.0

(1)

JURI4216

4.0

(1)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

4286

5.0

ALLJURIC

5.0

JU

5.0

J

5.0

JURIS

5.0

Reviews (86)
1.0
4.0
JURI2126
Oct 4, 2001

you basically teach yourself

2.0
5.0
4286
Feb 4, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
ALLJURIC
Feb 4, 2002

never any structure in what he teaches. very uninvolved!

2.0
5.0
JURI
Feb 4, 2002

should teach graduate studies

1.0
5.0
ALL
Feb 5, 2002

contempt for those who need help most

3.0
3.0
JURI
Mar 11, 2002

Abstract thinker. Many people don't get it.

3.0
4.0
JURI
Mar 18, 2002

very hard marker!

2.0
4.0
JURI2107
Mar 26, 2002

No Comments

1.0
4.0
JURI1105
Jan 23, 2003

I dropped this course because I couldn't deal with this man!

1.0
5.0
JURI4126
Mar 3, 2003

This man is evolving backwards. I have met slugs with more personality

5.0
4.0
JURI4126
Mar 11, 2003

Ketchen is great proff!! Those other people don't know what they're talking about. They must have failed.

4.0
4.0
JURI4126
Mar 13, 2003

Ketchen`s a good person and he`s not as bad as these people are saying. They`re just being babies by saying stupid things about his not being fit to teach animals. He`s hard but he`s always there for his students, no matter what!

1.0
5.0
JURI
Mar 13, 2003

He is a cruelly hard and difficult teacher who seems to have contempt for those in his class who need the most help. I would advise other students to avoid this little man.

3.0
4.0
JURI
Mar 19, 2003

Great personality, hard to understand the abstrat teaching.

5.0
5.0
JURI4126
Apr 1, 2003

the people who rate him on this site are being extremely unfair. Jim has the highest expectations for his students. In 3rd and 4th year courses it is expected that students should be able to think on their own. he is tough, but fair. funny guy too!

1.0
5.0
JURI
Apr 12, 2003

I have nothing but scathing criticism for this so called teacher. He is not helpful, mean-spirited, and, in my opinion, a waste of time. AVIOD like the plague.

1.0
5.0
JURI
Apr 25, 2003

Jerk!

1.0
5.0
JURI4126
Apr 30, 2003

Too sarcastic. Cruel with students. Does not like to teach and makes you feel like stupid. Avoid him like plague.

1.0
5.0
JURI
May 21, 2003

Unfit to teach dumb animals

4.0
4.0
UPPER
May 26, 2003

I have to laugh. Yes he seems arrogant, and maybe he is. At the end of the day though he is a good prof and an understanding, empathetic man. In fact, more so than many profs. He can dish the challenge out but he can also take it.

1.0
5.0
JURI
Jun 4, 2003

Make no mistake ... rocks have more empathy than this grinch. Compassion and engaging students can be a great way to reach students and foster learning. BUT ... NOT with big bad Jim.

1.0
5.0
JURI
Jun 6, 2003

No comment

5.0
3.0
JURI4286
Jul 2, 2003

He's the type of prof that if you work for him - your mark reflects it...likewise if you slack and show no signs of interest or comprehension...you're mark is also representative of your efforts! An extremely fair guy!

1.0
5.0
JURI
Jul 4, 2003

I did not enjoy his course one bit

1.0
5.0
JURI
Jul 7, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
JU
Jul 8, 2003

Boy, I did not like this teacher

1.0
5.0
JURI4286
Jul 16, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
JURI4286
Jul 23, 2003

I did not like him, I'm sure the feeling was mutual

1.0
5.0
JURI
Aug 6, 2003

I find it hard to believe this man is considered an educator

1.0
5.0
J
Aug 13, 2003

no comment

1.0
5.0
JURI
Sep 3, 2003

Well, it seems I'm not the only one.

1.0
5.0
JURI
Sep 4, 2003

No comment

1.0
5.0
JURIS
Sep 15, 2003

Do not take his class

1.0
5.0
JURI
Oct 24, 2003

widely disliked by students including me

1.0
5.0
JURI
Feb 20, 2004

On Sabbatical ... thank you!

1.0
5.0
JUR
Feb 23, 2004

No comment

1.0
5.0
JURIS
Grade: B
Feb 24, 2004

I had a very negative experience

5.0
3.0
SEVERAL
Feb 25, 2004

If you are willing to learn, he is willing to help. Very nice, great guy if you give him a chance. Can be very funny.

5.0
2.0
JURI
Mar 13, 2004

Great instruction

1.0
5.0
JURI
Mar 31, 2004

I won't take a course with this teacher again.

1.0
5.0
JURI
Apr 1, 2004

I found he was contemptuous of the students who needed his help the most. I very unpleasent environment for learning.

1.0
5.0
LAW
Apr 2, 2004

I felt alienated

1.0
5.0
YES
Apr 5, 2004

Bummer

1.0
2.0
JURI1105
Aug 15, 2004

Through Envision: Horrible readings. Warning!: More Philosophy than law. Be prepared for a lot of writing w/ the 4 mark questions. Follow all instructions in binder for great mark! :D Doesn't help students who ask for it.

4.0
2.0
REASONING
Sep 22, 2004

I don't know why people have rated him so poorly, I think he is a pretty nice guy and not a bad teacher. I wasn't interested in taking intro to legal reasoning, but it seems to be my favourite class so far this year!

2.0
2.0
REASONING
Oct 29, 2004

It takes him a long time to do questions and he often gets then wrong. He isn't able to keep control of his class, so he doesn't get through his lessons. He tries really hard to make it enjoyable. But if you don't get iyou are in trouble.

4.0
3.0
REASONING
Nov 22, 2004

He's a very nice and easy going prof.

4.0
2.0
LEGALR
Dec 3, 2004

much better in legal reasoning than in his first year course. got 62 last year and i'm batting an 81 so far this year. BEATS ME.

5.0
2.0
JURI4126
Mar 21, 2005

Dr. Ketchen is very conceptual in his approach. However, if you do the readings, his classes are most insightful and enlightening.

1.0
5.0
LEGAL
Mar 22, 2005

I would advise against taking courses with this teacher. I felt he was "petty"

1.0
5.0
JURI1105
Apr 12, 2005

Through Envision. Wow so many dry, bland & uninspiring readings accompanied by too many long tedious questions. Does not tell you where or why you lost your marks on your assignments, so when it comes to the exam you still won't know how to improve your answer.

5.0
3.0
REASONINGNLA
May 25, 2005

Ketchen's classes aren't easy, but he makes them interesting and is a lot of fun.

1.0
5.0
JUR1105
Jun 28, 2005

Unfit to teach animals

5.0
2.0
JURI
Grade: A
Sep 5, 2005

The material itself is pretty dry, but he's a good teacher and a pretty nice guy. I've done well in a few of his classes.

1.0
5.0
JURI
Sep 9, 2005

BEWARE ... I say no more

1.0
5.0
NLA
Jan 26, 2006

I remember a burdensome sadness

1.0
4.0
LEGALAUTHORITY
Feb 14, 2006

Just a horrible person and teacher

2.0
4.0
JURI1105
Jun 15, 2007

Very hard to like, aloof, seems to have contempt for students that were struggling, but they needed his help the most. Don't take a course with this anti-teacher.

4.0
3.0
JURI4216
Aug 16, 2007

Ketchen is a fun prof. He is interested in what he teaches which makes the class more interesting. It's important to remember that his background is in philosophy - so make sure your papers go a little deeper into the subject and he'll give you a good mark.

1.0
5.0
LAW1106
Oct 6, 2007

Absolutely horrible prof. Teaches was too fast; it is a struggle to keep up to him while trying to take notes. Gets very annoyed with and insults students who ask for greater detail. Tells everybody they'll fail the class if they don't buy the course text, which costs $90+ and is a bunch of photocopies...and then doesn't use it once! Avoid him!

1.0
3.0
JURI0000
Dec 8, 2007

Clearly more interested in being Union President than teaching students a thing. Often late or absent from class without warning. You will waste time showing up to campus to find out that he is not coming on more than one occasion. Read your text and feed him some philosophical **** or wear a Led Zeppelin t-shirt, either way you will get a B.

4.0
4.0
LAW1015
Jul 18, 2009

Tough but fair.

1.0
4.0
JURI4
Jan 29, 2010

Ketchen, well he's got a crap sense of textbook/readings since they are impossible to read and I understood more of the latin than the actualy English. Also, completely useless, good luck going to him for help, he'll laugh at you, subtley call you an idiot and give you some more unreadable articles to help you understand the other unreadable ones.

2.0
4.0
JURI1
May 4, 2010

Unfit to teach dumb animals.

3.0
4.0
JURI1105
Grade: B+
Aug 20, 2014

After reading many of these reviews I was nervous to take his class but I was pleasantly surprised. Some cons are that the readings are extremely difficult and he had a hard time staying on track but I also found him funny and relate-able and a completely fair marker.

3.0
4.0
JURI1105
Oct 26, 2015

He keeps the mood light which is nice but he often gets off topic and rambles.

4.0
3.0
JURI1105
Jan 11, 2016

I found Ketchen to be relatable, funny and a fair marker. The course is definitely not an easy A, but if you stay on top of your work, study and don't procrastinate, you'll be fine. He does tend to ramble off a lot though so make sure you're only writing out the key information that he mentions in his lectures.

2.0
5.0
JURI1105
Grade: B-
Mar 10, 2016

He's very unorganized in his thinking and lectures. He's kinda funny but his ramblings go on. You're honestly better off to just read the material.

5.0
2.0
JURI1105
Grade: B+
Apr 29, 2016

Ketchen is looking for students to engage in the material with him, laugh at the cheesy jokes he loves to make and make a point for him to get to know your name you are more likely to have a good experience. He hates long lectures especially if he teaching an afternoon class. You have to find the readings yourself rather than him tell you.

5.0
3.0
JURI1105
Grade: A
Jun 28, 2016
Would take again

James Ketchen is an excellent teacher. You absolutely need to be in class and following the lecture and he is always willing to clarify is necessary. He makes his material interesting if you give it a chance. He is very fair with grading and forthcoming with assistance regarding assignment. My favourite teacher by far!

4.0
4.0
JURI1105
Grade: B-
Mar 3, 2017
Would take again

I really like Professor Ketchen, but I did not like his class. Not liking his class had nothing to do with his teaching style, I just found the content very dry. I do not recommend taking an intro law class unless you have to.

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
5.0
JURI1105
Grade: C+
Sep 19, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Readings required for this course were very difficult to understand - did not tell us what material Quiz 1 and 2 covered - when asked no response was given. Extremely tough course; did all readings, and extensive research and additional readings but i just found this course to be very dry and poorly executed. certain surprises on the final exam.

Tough Grader
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
TEST HEAVY
3.0
3.0
JURI1105
Grade: A-
Oct 15, 2017
Would take again

Rambles on a lot in lectures, and often repeats key aspects. If you pay attention to what he says during lectures, you'll do fine. Textbooks are hard to understand but did fine with simply studying notes he provided as well as notes taken during class. Was funny and tried to joke around to lighten the mood.

Tough Grader
Hilarious
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
2.0
JURI1105
Grade: A+
Jan 3, 2018
Would take again

Hes a funny guy. His tests arent bad and the essay paper is alright. If you listen and study the notes youll be fine.

Respected
Hilarious
Would take again
3.0
4.0
JURI1105
Dec 7, 2018
Would take again

He's a funny guy, however, goes off on tangents during the lectures. You don't always realize when he says something important because he kinda rants. Take notes as much as possible, and don't just depend on the textbook because it's hard to read and understand.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Hilarious
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
JUR1105
Dec 13, 2018
Would take again

Ketchen is a good guy, easy to talk to outside of class. He rambles from time to time; however, if you take notes during the lectures you'll be fine for tests/exam. Isn't the easiest of markers so be sure you understand the information to a decent extent.

Tough Grader
Hilarious
TEST HEAVY
1.0
3.0
JURL1105
Grade: B+
Jul 9, 2019
Wouldn't take again

probably one of the weakest professors i have had. not a bad person, but not cut out to teach. I found the lectures dry and he seems to lose track of what he is talking about half the time. Do not take unless you have to.

Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
JURI2107
Grade: B+
Mar 25, 2020
Would take again

Ketchen is a PERFECT professor to have. He is one of the few professors who actually cares about his students. Although law is normally boring, Ketchen tries his best to make it interesting. Attendance is not mandatory either, which allows you to be independant and flexible. You are graded the effort you give. Outline/Criteria is straight forward.

Gives good feedback
Respected
Caring
5.0
3.0
JURI1105
Grade: A-
Jul 10, 2020
Would take again

First prof Ive had who empathizes with reality of life. He is willing to go the extra mile to help his students. All you need to do is communicate. Pay attention to due dates and quiz dates. He doesnt remind you. His motto: If you dont ask, you wont receive. So ask. He is generous.

Respected
Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
5.0
3.0
JURI2126
Nov 18, 2021
Would take again

Best teacher I have ever had, plain and simple. Genuinely cares for his students and is understanding of personal lives and work in other classes.

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Participation matters
4.0
2.0
JURI1105
Grade: A-
Jan 25, 2022
Would take again

What an incredible guy, very easy marker and a genuinely nice guy.

Gives good feedback
Accessible outside class
Caring
1.0
1.0
JURI
Grade: A-
Mar 22, 2024

Although a nice guy, I have taken his classes all four years of my undergrad in Law and I have not learnt a single thing. Complete waste of money, will talk about ANYTHING but legal material all term. (Last class he was talking about ghosts???) Also does not know what he's talking about. Good luck future law students lol.

Accessible outside class
1.0
1.0
4826
Grade: B+
Mar 22, 2024

I have taken classes with him all four years of my undergrad in Law and I have not learnt a single thing. He is a nice guy but honestly is not able to teach on law. COMPLETE waste of money, most classes he'll just complain about technology not working, talk about how he's doing, then end it early. Thousands of dollars and for what?

Tough grader
Graded by few things
2.0
1.0
JUR1105
Grade: A-
Dec 9, 2024

Although a nice man, he strayed entirely from the syllabus, was out of class more often then he was in it, didn't get work back in a timely manner whatsoever, and spent three lectures discussing the same minute topic that could be easily defined in 5 minutes. Honestly, a bit of a waste of money.

2.0
3.0
JURI
Grade: B+
Sep 13, 2025

He is a wonderful man who is frequently humorous and approachable. His syllabus is disorganized and unhelpful, and a lot of his content is unrelated to the course description. He provides a lot of unrelated links and books, which makes it seem like a waste of time. You always feel lost, which is incredibly frustrating.

Participation matters
Gives good feedback
Lecture heavy
5.0
2.0
ALL
Grade: A
Nov 17, 2025
Would take again

He was a great teacher who gave you everything you needed to succeed in the lectures. From textbook material to in class movies, we were graded mostly on what he presented during class. Other resources like the textbook were only to support. In this sense, participation wasn't mandatory but it was clearly important.

Clear grading criteria
Gives good feedback
Caring
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

32%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B+

95% confidence
Based on 19 grades
Most common grades:
B+ (6)
A- (5)
A (3)
Grade Distribution
A(4)B(3)C(1)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(11)
Based on 19 reported grades
B+: 6
A-: 5
A: 3
B-: 2
Common Tags
Gives good feedback (5)
Hilarious (4)
Accessible outside class (4)
LECTURE HEAVY (3)
Tough Grader (3)
Respected (3)
Caring (3)
Get ready to read (2)
Rating Trend

Improving

+1.03 avg change
Nov
Jan
Mar
Dec
Sep
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

SEVERAL

5.0

(1)

REASONINGNLA

5.0

(1)

UPPER

4.0

(1)

LEGALR

4.0

(1)

JURI4216

4.0

(1)
+27 more courses
Difficulty by Course

4286

5.0

ALLJURIC

5.0

JU

5.0

J

5.0

JURIS

5.0

Similar Professors