3.3

James Van Sickle

Writing - Grand Valley State University

3.3
Quality
3.3
Difficulty
57%
Would Retake
83
Reviews
3.3
Quality
3.3
Difficulty
3.4
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

57%

Would Retake

83

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

23

4

20

3

21

2

9

1

10

What Students Say

Professor Van Sickle is an okay professor if you love to write and to be graded harshly

WRT150 - 2.0 rating

Van Sickle loves to lecture

WRT150 - 3.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

73%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

68% confidence
Based on 6 grades
Most common grades:
A (3)
B (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(4)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 6 reported grades
A: 3
B: 1
A+: 1
A-: 1
Common Tags
Gives good feedback (4)
Tough Grader (3)
Skip class? You won't pass. (2)
Participation matters (2)
Tough grader (2)
Hilarious (1)
GROUP PROJECTS (1)
SO MANY PAPERS (1)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.61 avg change
Dec
Mar
Dec
May
Apr
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

WRT305

5.0

(2)

WRT350

5.0

(1)

WR150

4.5

(2)

WRIT150

4.5

(2)

WRT098

4.0

(2)
+4 more courses
Difficulty by Course

BIO792

5.0

WRT150ZZ

4.0

WRT098

4.0

WRT150

3.4

ENG150

3.3

Reviews (83)
1.0
3.0
ENG150
Sep 29, 2001

No Comments

3.0
3.0
ENG150
Jul 19, 2001

Boring! never lets you out early(ever) GET OUT!!

4.0
3.0
ENG150
Grade: B
Oct 4, 2001

class is hard, but lots of examples given.helpful when asked

3.0
3.0
WRT150
Oct 18, 2001

boring!! he will help if asked.

3.0
3.0
WRT150
Oct 21, 2001

He's very RANDOM, days when he lectures are BORING. Tells same stories over

3.0
4.0
WRT150
Nov 12, 2001

Boring boring boring!!!!!!!!!

2.0
3.0
WRT150
Nov 7, 2001

No Comments

1.0
4.0
WRT150ZZ
Nov 13, 2001

He hates you, your mom, and your dog already!

1.0
5.0
ENG150
Dec 4, 2001

MONOTONE, NOT HELPFUL AT ALL, contradictory grading system, vague grading

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Dec 4, 2001

He always offers help

2.0
4.0
WRT150
Dec 5, 2001

He think you are dumb and he will tell you that to your face

5.0
1.0
WRT150
Dec 10, 2001

No Comments

3.0
2.0
WRT150
Dec 11, 2001

Not bad, a little dry, but not tons of work, he will help if asked

3.0
4.0
WRT150
Dec 11, 2001

comments on paper vague, good examples given, but grades unclear

2.0
4.0
WRT150
Dec 18, 2001

no matter what you turn it....he'll rip it to shreads. made me feel stupid

1.0
2.0
ENG150
Jan 7, 2002

No Comments

1.0
5.0
WRT150
Jan 14, 2002

i got a 4 on my ap english exam...yet a c+ in class..makes sense?

1.0
5.0
ENG150
Feb 8, 2002

No matter how hard you try you will not get an A

2.0
3.0
WRT150
Feb 19, 2002

No Comments

3.0
2.0
WRT150
Apr 5, 2002

he seemed alright as a person but kind of an @$$ in class

2.0
4.0
WRT150
Apr 12, 2002

he just didn't inspire me to want to write anything because he is so critical

1.0
4.0
WRT150
Jun 12, 2002

boring lecture, but he gives great ideas to improve, got an A on my portfolio:)

2.0
3.0
WRT150
Grade: A+
Oct 12, 2002

Proof that ex-army men shouldn't be college englishprof.Tells pointless stories.

4.0
3.0
WRT150
Aug 24, 2002

Van Sickle is a good prof. Go to class, do the work and you'll do fine.

3.0
4.0
WRT150
Oct 22, 2002

one word......wierd

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Oct 27, 2002

nice guy..gives really good comments on how to improve papers. boring in class

2.0
4.0
WRT150
Nov 29, 2002

Rips your writings to shreads, also goes on talks that mean nothing

4.0
3.0
WRT150
Mar 27, 2003

He's a nice guy, but very boring in class. Everyone complains about how he rips their papers to shreds but I feel he's just trying to help so you'll get a good grade.

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Apr 1, 2003

Real nice guy, grades hard but critiques papers well and is very helpful. Drink a coffee before class though. I recommend him!

5.0
2.0
ENG150
Apr 18, 2003

No Comments

1.0
5.0
WRT150
Apr 25, 2003

Boring, very critical, pointless stories.

4.0
2.0
WRT150
Oct 6, 2003

Very critical on the papers. I used to think I wrote well. Kind of lost the confidence in my writing a bit. I know that it'll be a big help in the end though.

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Oct 28, 2003

He is a really nice guy but a very hard teacher. He will tear your papers apart and find everything wrong with them. It is good that he is so critical b/c it pays off for final drafts for your portfolio paprs.

3.0
4.0
WRT150
Nov 7, 2003

Abandon all hope at the doorway. You will not win.

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Nov 18, 2003

Very hard grader, lots of comments on paper. Can be hard. Expects a lot more than other writing teachers but gives a lot too. Very willing to help.

1.0
5.0
BIO792
Nov 23, 2003

confusing.

3.0
2.0
WRT150
Dec 10, 2003

Nice guy easy enough class but his lectures kinda wander and make you sleepy

4.0
3.0
WRT150
Jan 5, 2004

Nice guy. Very critical. But in the end it really pays off. Can get boring. But overall he's a good prof.

3.0
1.0
WRT150
Feb 5, 2004

HE IS A VERY EASY PROF THAT GIVES NO HOMEWORK BESIDES YOUR PAPERS. HE ALWAYS FINDS A WAY TO GO OFF ON A TANGENT IN HIS LECTURES. NOT A GOOD CLASS TO HAVE AT 8AM.

4.0
4.0
WRT150
Mar 17, 2004

wow. Hard grader, he will not accept anything less than perfect. He turns back all your papers covered in red pen and thinks nothing of it, if you take this class one word-revise!!!

2.0
4.0
WRT150
Apr 10, 2004

I can't do anything right in this class! All he ever says is "this topic has potential". I took AP composition in high school with an A and struggled in his class. I think it's just the whole GV writing dept. It's not like this at other universi

5.0
2.0
WR150
Apr 27, 2004

Nice guy...If your papers get his approval, they will more than pass portfolio. Always willing to help-just ask!The more often you submit a paper, the more detailed he will be with his responses.

5.0
1.0
WRT305
Aug 11, 2004

take this class it is really easy. he lets you revise your papers and turn them back in for a better grade. not strict on due dates at all. only have to write 4 papers, not portfolio style grading.

4.0
3.0
WRT150
Nov 17, 2004

the class itself is what makes it bad hes good with giving help hes just but you have to ask him and a lot of questions- due dates arent very strict hes a nice guy just a horrible class

4.0
3.0
WRT150
Dec 14, 2004

The class was awful, but he was ok. i did really like that we were able to turn in each paper multiple times until you get a grade that you like. also liked that he wasnt too strict on due dates.

4.0
3.0
WRT150
Jan 5, 2005

Very nice guy, if you put the extra effort into class and your papers he is much more willing to help you, lectures are extrememly boring though, he's a tough grader, nothing comes back without lots of red marks, its nice that you can resubmit papers up until the end

5.0
2.0
WRIT150
Jan 13, 2005

Great teacher!!!

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Jan 14, 2005

He was a great prof and extremely helpful. Overall just a nice guy who knows what he's talking about.

5.0
3.0
WRT150
May 3, 2005

He's great! He's got tons of experience and gives lots of advice if you ask. I'd take him again!!

5.0
2.0
WRT150
May 10, 2005

He was a great prof.! He really knew what he was talking about and was willing to help! I'd recommend him for this class!

5.0
3.0
WRT150
May 24, 2005

This guy is WONDERFUL!!! He's been around the world during his military years and brings a refreshing perspective in the classroom! He's got bunches of kids himself and knows his stuff regarding writing. What a smart and sexy man of the world! I LOVE him!!:) He's like my DAD!!!:)

3.0
2.0
WRT150
Jun 12, 2006

No Comments

5.0
4.0
WRT150
Jul 25, 2006

He was a great prof to have for a introductory to writing class. He really knew what he was talking about, and he knew what a good paper needed. The lectures can be very boring at times, but it was worth it. I wouldn't choose another professor because my writing skills greatly improved after taking his class.

3.0
2.0
WRT150
Aug 27, 2006

BORING! He just uses powerpoint and reads right from it. We hardly EVER used our textbook, big waste of money, he puts everything on powerpoint that is in the book! But if you don't go to class much, then read the book. The papers are EASY to write, as long as you follow directions. Boring man, but okay class.

3.0
3.0
WRT150
Nov 28, 2006

He is a nice guy, but extremely boring! A majority of the class is spent looking at powerpoint presentations and listening to him talk about various things. He is a rough grader on papers. I felt like I couldn't do anything right in this class!

4.0
5.0
WRT150
Dec 3, 2006

He is a nice guy but SO boring! He is a really tough grader but you can get extra help if needed. Tough class, he is hard to please.

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Dec 4, 2006

Awesome professor! Class was interesting and I learned a lot.

4.0
3.0
WRT150
Dec 7, 2007

Lectures tend to be boring, can go off on random tangents at times. Only grade is final portfolio at the end of the semester. Tough grader but gives a lot of feedback for improving your paper. Can only miss 4 classes or he might not take your portfolio. Easy class for the most part.

4.0
4.0
WRT150
Dec 12, 2007

Ok prof. Very tough grader. Willing to help. If you struggle with writing do not take this prof.

3.0
5.0
WRT150
Apr 7, 2008

This professor sucked. Very Boring and has unreal expectations. He is a very tough grader.

4.0
4.0
WRT098
Nov 7, 2008

He is some what boring. He tries to bring humor into class, but usually fails. He's an awesome prof. tho. He is a tough grader, but that's good for you. It gets you ready for the higher levels. He is willing to help, as long as you ask, he won't ask you. Overall, if you're signed up for his course TAKE IT. It will do you some good.

4.0
4.0
WRT098
Dec 14, 2008

Ok, yeah he does ramble and it can be boring. But, he's a REALLY good professor. He will help you with whatever you need and encourages you to ask for help. He's hard, but tough $#!^, you're in college. You will walk out of this class with way better writing skills. I really recommend this guy.

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Mar 24, 2009

Teacher may talk a lot, but he is very kind and understanding. He's always willing to grade papers thoroughly and gets them back on time. He really helps improve writing skills! He is pretty lenient with due dates, but you must go to class.

5.0
4.0
WRT305
Jul 26, 2009

Good guy. Tough grader, but that is helpful to improving writing skills.

4.0
4.0
WRT150
Dec 9, 2009

I really enjoyed this class. Van Sickley was very helpful and he was always there to assist you. Very nice guy!

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Dec 3, 2010

Prof. Van Sickle is boring in the beginning if you know about paper types and writing styles, but once you get into writing papers, he is very helpful with comments and suggestions and flexible with due dates. He REALLY helps improve your writing with constructive comments. I recommend him for any other time but 8 am.

5.0
5.0
WRT150
Dec 20, 2010

He's very boring and knows you by face and name, so don't even think about skipping class. He is very help full if you actually need help in writing, he's really annoying if your just there for the gen ed credit.

5.0
3.0
WRT150
Jan 6, 2011

He comes off and kind of intense, but's he's actually really nice and funny. He gives great feedback, and is good with flexable deadlines. He does ramble sometimes though.

5.0
3.0
WRT350
Jul 17, 2011

One of my favorite professors at GVSU. Very patient, helpful, and timely with grading. Explains concepts thoroughly and is great with feedback. Very devoted to student success. Very organized and on top of his work.

5.0
4.0
WRT150
Sep 8, 2011

He has to be one of the best writing profs at GVSU. His explanations of requirements and assignments, as well as paper feedback, are very clear. Very patient and helpful with your portfolio, and he works with you to make sure you pass.

4.0
2.0
WRT150
Dec 7, 2012

He was a very good writing teacher since he has been at it for a longggg time. His level of interaction was low but that made the writing pace up to the writer which was really nice.

2.0
5.0
WRT150
Sep 23, 2013

Professor Van Sickle is an okay professor if you love to write and to be graded harshly. However he is not the teacher for me. Even if you have a perfect paper or assignment he will find a way to mark down points. He is extremely judgmental and does not grade on effectiveness but he grades with opinion. I would NOT recommend him for anyone!

3.0
4.0
WRT150
Nov 16, 2013

Pretty hard class, even though I've always been told I was a good writer. When you first submit your draft, you can expect to have a bad grade and to have many comments, but expect the same on your revised paper; it never seems to be good enough! Also a hardworker; he'll revise your paper any moment, not taking too long and as many times as needed

3.0
5.0
WRT150
Dec 18, 2013

For being a first year writing class I thought he was a very tough professor. He is friendly and somewhat helpful when you attend his office hours but don't expect to get an A in his class. I graduated high school with a 3.97 and had an English professor from another college proofread my portfolio and got a B.

3.0
4.0
WRT150
Apr 22, 2014

Van Sickle loves to lecture! Most classes have two classes periods per week, one for lecture and one in the lab to work on papers. However, he lectured through most of our labs. I recommend working on papers early in the class and submitting several revisions. His critiques were VERY helpful and plentiful.

4.0
2.0
WRT150
Grade: A
Jan 6, 2015

Professor Van Sickle, is a great professor if you enjoy writing. He makes you work really hard if you want a grade above a B. He might seem harsh at first, but he can actually be really helpful if you come to him and ask questions. Definitely recommend this professor to anyone who wants to really push themselves in Writing 150.

4.0
4.0
WRIT150
Dec 8, 2016
Would take again

He seems super intimidating at first but he really grows on you. He is a very tough grader but it will really help your writing and hopefully pay off in the long run! Overall, really like him.

Tough Grader
Gives good feedback
Skip class? You won't pass.
4.0
3.0
WR150
Mar 30, 2017
Would take again

Good teacher, only have to write 3 essays compared to 4, but the feedback before the portfolio is not a letter grade but his own form of grading. Lots of group work with the same group but its easy. Tough grader, near impossible to get 100% or even over 90% on his assignments but is not too strict about when you turn them in. Old but hilarious.

Gives good feedback
Hilarious
GROUP PROJECTS
3.0
4.0
WRT150
Grade: A-
Dec 12, 2017
Wouldn't take again

WRT 150 requires a lot of busy work, due to the fact that you only write 3 papers in the class. You are allowed 3 absences before failing the course, but he is lenient if there is a legitimate reason that you are gone. He has a dry sense of humor and doesn't express much emotion, but is an overall good guy.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
SO MANY PAPERS
3.0
4.0
WRT150
Dec 13, 2017
Would take again

Overall ok. Flexible on due dates and is a tough grader but it helps you out in the end.

Tough Grader
Participation matters
1.0
5.0
WRT150
May 2, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Overall, Van Sickle is a horrible professor. Although you get graded throughout the semester, it does not affect your end grade. Even after editing all of the papers, the group grading the papers, does not want you to succeed.

3.0
3.0
WRT150
Grade: A
Apr 23, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He is not the worst teacher. He gives a lot of busy work and grades it very specifically. He'll do a minus .1 here, minus .3 there, it does not make sense. If you skip class you have to make up the work, even if its group work, you'll have to do it on your own. He does not care about due dates, turn things in whenever. But warning, he's so boring.

Gives good feedback
Skip class? You won't pass.
Tough grader
4.0
5.0
WRT150
Grade: A
Dec 18, 2019
Would take again

I am not going to lie, when I first enrolled in Professor Van Sickle's class I feared him. He is very intimidating and a harsh grader. However, I learned so much from him. I highly recommend taking his class if you want to actually learn how to become a great writer, especially if it will be beneficial to your major. Scary man, just go to class.

Gives good feedback
Tough grader
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

73%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

68% confidence
Based on 6 grades
Most common grades:
A (3)
B (1)
A+ (1)
Grade Distribution
A(4)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 6 reported grades
A: 3
B: 1
A+: 1
A-: 1
Common Tags
Gives good feedback (4)
Tough Grader (3)
Skip class? You won't pass. (2)
Participation matters (2)
Tough grader (2)
Hilarious (1)
GROUP PROJECTS (1)
SO MANY PAPERS (1)
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.61 avg change
Dec
Mar
Dec
May
Apr
Dec
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

WRT305

5.0

(2)

WRT350

5.0

(1)

WR150

4.5

(2)

WRIT150

4.5

(2)

WRT098

4.0

(2)
+4 more courses
Difficulty by Course

BIO792

5.0

WRT150ZZ

4.0

WRT098

4.0

WRT150

3.4

ENG150

3.3

Similar Professors