2.5

James Woodard

History - Montclair State University

2.5
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
14%
Would Retake
99
Reviews
2.5
Quality
3.9
Difficulty
2.4
Helpful
2.6
Clarity

14%

Would Retake

99

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

14

4

17

3

15

2

22

1

31

What Students Say

Get ready for a challegning class

HIST333 - 3.0 rating

HE IS A TERRIBLE PROFESSOR

HIST333 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

45%

Textbook Required

92%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

95% confidence
Based on 20 grades
Most common grades:
C- (3)
B+ (3)
A+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(5)B(4)C(3)D(2)F(2)A-/B+(6)
Based on 25 reported grades
C-: 3
B+: 3
A+: 3
A-: 3
Common Tags
Get ready to read (23)
Lecture heavy (8)
Graded by few things (6)
Tough grader (6)
LECTURE HEAVY (5)
Tough Grader (5)
Participation matters (3)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.21 avg change
Aug
Apr
Dec
Jun
Dec
Feb
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HIST117

5.0

(2)

HIST430

4.0

(5)

HIST115

4.0

(2)

HIST

4.0

(1)

HIST114

3.2

(13)
+11 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HIST499

5.0

HITS333

5.0

CN24531

4.8

HIST117

4.5

HIST430

4.2

Reviews (99)
2.0
5.0
HIST400
Oct 18, 2006

Is this guy for real?? I wonder who at MSU gave this guy a job! This guy seriously does not know a thing about teaching and gives nothing to the students to look forward to! I don't think the students nor himself has any clue what is being discussed in class! I would so drop this guy's class if I wasn't graduating this semester! aargghh!!

1.0
5.0
HIST103
Nov 3, 2006

No Comments

1.0
5.0
HIST114
Nov 14, 2006

No Comments

4.0
3.0
HIST400
Jan 5, 2007

The class was no walk in the park, but it is a Senior level course. Lectures were a bore and a lot of students dropped the class. Those who remained found a professor that truly opened up and showed he wasn't so bad after all. You have to hand in a 4pg reaction ppr every other week. NO MIDTERM OR FINAL! Just a 14pg+ term paper.

5.0
3.0
HIST114
Jan 15, 2007

Excellent teacher! He knows his subject very well and quotes from primary historical sources. He is also fair and attendance is not mandatory. I wouldn't recommend missing a class as the notes are imprtant. The tests are fair just make sure you put together a good essay. He speaks slowly which some find dull but it helps when taking notes. Take him

1.0
3.0
HIST114
May 13, 2007

worst class i've ever had and worst professor i've ever had! sooooooooo boring. he talks so slow and paces back and forth and it is so distracting no can concentrate on what he is saying.

5.0
1.0
HIST114
May 15, 2007

He is a fair grader. Make sure that you organize the essays for the exams. Although there was no required textbook, it is important to attend class regularly and take good notes.

4.0
3.0
HIST114
Jun 28, 2007

Attendance and participation not mandatory. His midterm and final comes directly from his lectures, and he does that a lot. Take down what he says in class, and go often and you should get a good grade. He is a fair grader and a good professor,Good class to take towards History majors because you will actually learn something. Textbook usage is low

4.0
3.0
HIST114
Dec 12, 2007

If youre into 2 exams being your entire grade then hes your man. He doesnt take attendance but if you wanna pass the class you better plan on going, unless you yourself already know the history of Latin America. Smart man to say the least but lectures make me want to jump out a window.

2.0
5.0
HIST499
Jan 21, 2008

He is extremely demanding in expecting you to focus all your attention on his class and his only. He assigns alot of reading per week also.

2.0
4.0
HIST101
Apr 9, 2008

OK I would not reccomend this teacher to anyone He rambles on the whole time and all you are doing is taking notes that are all over the place!he only gives 3 grades a quiz midterm and final..50 %of you grade is the midterm its CRAZY and the final is cummulative! So do urself a favor and take another professor. He might be goodlooking but who cares

3.0
3.0
HIST114
Apr 9, 2008

He knows history, but does not know HOW to TEACH it. He's very unorganized and goes from one topic to another.

1.0
5.0
HIST116
May 16, 2008

Do not take this professor doesn't know how to teach. He is rude to his students. If you want your GPA to go down then take him.

3.0
2.0
HIST116
May 19, 2008

Knows his stuff but has difficulty conveying his own excitement for the material to the students (aka boring). Attendance isn't mandatory so you're best off just reading the book and showing up on key days (quiz/test reviews and days of quizzes/tests). Pretty easy class overall. Would not recommend for non-history majors.

2.0
4.0
HIST116
Aug 10, 2008

ugh. the guy is smart, ill give him that, but he shows very little excitement while presenting his material. i almost fell asleep every class [im a history major, too!] and the final was cumulative. i didnt buy the book, there's actually a partial copy on google books that gives you a good amount of material. take it only if you need to...

2.0
3.0
HIST114
Oct 21, 2008

how can i say this without using foul language, he sucks, boring and is just a waste of a semester. if you like to sit there and take notes for the full hour and 15 while at the same time try hard to stay awake then be my guest. only 2 tests and 1 quiz, 2 textbooks, and some maps to look at. STAY FAR FAR AWAY FROM THIS TEACHER!

1.0
5.0
HIST114
Oct 22, 2008

WORST TEACHER AT MONTCLAIR. This is my final semester and i must say this guy is TERRIBLE. I have never had a teacher or a class that was so boring and out of touch with reality. Does he actually think anyone cares about Latin American History? Its a 100 level class and he makes it a 400 level class. He laughs when he says how many people are

2.0
5.0
HIST114
Oct 23, 2008

Basically everyone else is right. Boring, long lectures, 3 grades the whole class. Don't know how I got him in the first place, I think my teacher switched. Would have NEVER taken this guy. This is a 100 level that should be easy but it's hard. So hard.

5.0
2.0
HIST333
Nov 12, 2008

The reviews that are on here are clearly from students who walked into college expecting it to be a breeze. If you want to learn something you have to work. Woodard isn't easy, but he is extremely fair and wants to teach his students something. I've gained a great deal from this man and definitely appreciate it. I took him twice and recommend him.

5.0
4.0
HIST333
Dec 5, 2008

Woodard is okay. He's a tough grader and doesn't always look at your content versus your grammar. He's not that bad if you have to take him, but if you can avoid him, I'd try for something else. Absolutely don't take him if you have a heavy course load on top of this.

4.0
2.0
HIST333
Jan 7, 2009

I don't know what these people are talking about. Woodard is THE MAN. I took him for History of Brazil, a 300s class, and I thought the workload was very fair. he's really cool and easy on the eyes, haha. I'm taking another class with him this coming spring. btw his upper level classes get a nice surprise at the end of the semester :)

5.0
4.0
HIST430
Jan 21, 2009

Good class if you're interested in the material. It is a level 400 history class, so there is a lot of reading. Anyone who just wants an easy A shouldn't take the class, but you will walk out actually learning something. It isn't that unbearable it took 4 other upper level classes with this one and walked out with a B.

3.0
5.0
HIST116
Jan 28, 2009

wow. this guy is the worst. wants a class at MSU to be like harvard, well its not class attendance not mandatory, but he doesn't post handouts or other necessary study tools, retarded POST IT dont waste paper also snow day with my other 3 classes canceled, this guy is here in knee high boots had to come bc he is giving study guide and he WOULDNTPOS

3.0
4.0
HIST116
Apr 3, 2009

I am a history major, and I must say that this class is somewhat more challenging for me than the 400 history class I am taking.Attendance is not mandatory and if you are not motivated to go,this will having you skipping class. But it is as if you have to be there since the lectures he gives are necessary for the exams. I hope I get at least a B-

5.0
4.0
HIST430
May 4, 2009

Extremely helpful and intelligent. One of the best courses/teachers that I have taken in my lengthy college career. Lots of work and independent study required. If that's not your thing, then don't take his course.

1.0
5.0
HIST116
May 13, 2009

This Dude, where do I begin..BORINGGGGG OMG I should have listened to my fellow friends when they said not to take him with capital letters NOT. His test are crazy, he doesnt really tell you what to study for.. awww man Im so angry I took him!!! LATIN AMERICA.. who cares NEVER TAKE HIM

2.0
4.0
HIST116
May 21, 2009

This guy is really into Latin American History. I can respect that. BUT, his teaching methods and expecatations for a 100 Level course are WAY too high. He teaches it like a 400 Level course. Nice guy and a Mets fan too, but way to serious and unclear for a Introductory 100 Level course.

5.0
4.0
HIST430
Jun 10, 2009

This class was by far one of the most challenging classes I have taken,but I couldn't ask for a better professor! Professor Woodard is extremely intelligent learn & u will definitely learn a lot from him! This class is very demanding, but honestly if u can't deal with it, then what are you doing in college? Definitely a great class and professor!

2.0
5.0
HIST116
Nov 17, 2009

Although he is good looking, he definitely has some smarts. When I am in his class I feel like I am at a party where they are speaking in another language. There is no need to use such big words all the time. He takes time to think of bigger, smarter words to sound smart. This class is deff a challenge. I would never recommend it to anyone!

4.0
2.0
HIST114
Dec 1, 2009

Overall,he's a cool professor.He's passionate about Latin American history,and gives a laid back, calm feeling to the class. You don't have to show up all the time,just know a lot about the course you are taking, cuz passing the midterm and final is what counts. He even handed out candy one time to all of us one day. No research paper at all. Cool.

4.0
4.0
HIST116
Mar 26, 2010

Good teacher, pretty difficult if you don't attend class, but not impossible. Fair grader, will not cheat you out of a good grade or fail you for no reason. Actually made the subject interesting and somewhat fun to learn about. Nice, funny, intelligent. If you must take a non-western hist class, take this one.

4.0
4.0
HIST333
Apr 22, 2010

Those who take Woodard's lower level class have to keep in mind that he is working with 100 or so students who are mostly there to fulfill a gen ed requirement and couldn't give a damn. He is extremely knowledgeable, which may make him seem aloof but don't let this discourage you. If you are willing to put in the work, you will gain so much.

5.0
5.0
HIST117
May 15, 2010

Very hard but also very helpful. he gives you the essay topics for both the mid-term and final. attend class let him know who you are and you'll do good

5.0
4.0
HIST117
Aug 14, 2010

def. a smart and great professor. Yes, he is hard but he does give you the essay questions(which are 60% of the test) before hand. If you're passionate about history and learning, take him. If you're looking for an easy A do not.

3.0
4.0
HIST116
Aug 23, 2010

He's Okay, I would not recommend him to anyone. He is very very boring and he takes the time to think of bigger words to make himself sound smarter. The downside to that is that he loses students. The essays are given but he will give you 8 essays and only 2 will appear on the exam. Even then he grades harder than he should. He is very nice though

4.0
2.0
HIST114
Oct 31, 2010

it was just funny to listen to him teach, so he wasn't a good speaker. he's approachable and nice but the work/tests were semi-hard if you didn't pay attention in class. made us buy two books and we never used the second one.

3.0
3.0
HIST116
Dec 16, 2010

This class was definitely harder than I expected but by no means impossible. If you go to the lectures and ask questions you'll do fine. He can be a tough grader at times but he is fair at the same time. Only 3 grades being a map quiz midterm and final but you get the essay questions ahead of time. If you're ready to work in college take this class

5.0
3.0
HIST116
Dec 23, 2010

Nice guy, good teacher. Keep on top of the reading, take good notes during lectures. He talks slowly but it's helful for note taking. 3 grades: Map quiz 10% Midterm 40% Final 50% If you read the books and paid attention, the tests should be cake. Work on the essays he gives before the tests since theyre worth 60% Not an easy A but still achievable.

4.0
4.0
HIST116
May 13, 2011

A tad on the pedantic side with his lectures. Constantly called me by the wrong first name... got an A to spite him and his course

3.0
4.0
HIST333
Jul 12, 2011

There is a large amount of reading which you must stay on top of because you discuss it every class. Got a bit boring because it focused on politics which is his forte not mine. I hated the book review which was very unclear and the style is not for UG students since we don't really research historians/writers persay but all in all it wasn't bad.

3.0
4.0
HIST116
Nov 10, 2011

he was hot, but that's about it. he talks sooooo slow ! i fell asleep almost every class i went to-not many. reading was very important and note taking. required like 4 books for our class -_-. i withdrew, it was way too much for me especially since it was my 1st semester of freshmen year. smh don't take him !

5.0
2.0
HIST116
Nov 21, 2011

Woodard is Legit, I might be the only one who thinks that though!! If you know what your doing he's easy and the man sweats like its his job!

2.0
5.0
HIST116
Dec 5, 2011

I do not like his class at all. He takes five to ten second breaks between sentences. He only has three grades throughout the semester: a map test for 10%, a midterm for 40%, and a final for 50%. You really need to read the texts to pass the class; his lectures alone won't help you unless you take excellent notes. PS - He sweats like it's his job!

4.0
4.0
HIST115
Apr 25, 2012

Woodard knows his stuff, but he talks wayy too slow and never finished lectures on time. By that I mean that we're way behind on the syllabus. He knows his stuff and he answers questions, but he answers them cryptically and he doesn't care for his students whether it's grades, or issues. Won't excuse you unless you're dying. Tough grader too.

3.0
2.0
HIST116
May 10, 2012

he talks very slowly and it is hard to not fall asleep in his class. three exams and they are the only grades in the class. he tries to be funny, and it sometimes works. he knows his subject area very well and if you have a question, he tries his best to explain it, but it doesn't always help

2.0
4.0
HIST116
May 15, 2012

The class consists of 1 map quiz, a mid-term, and a final exam. At first, it seems like a straightforward class, but Woodard is a mundane guy that lectures on stuff that isn't on the exams. I highly encourage everyone to avoid taking any of his classes.

3.0
4.0
HIST333
Oct 9, 2012

Woodard is a great professor but the workload is insane.. But then again it's college not high school. The one sucky thing is that u have to get a million books for his class

2.0
5.0
HIST333
Dec 3, 2012

this guy is out of his mind. a ton of books and work. he's actually a nice guy but dont take the class if you plan on being lazy. if you want a challenge then take him, if not then stay FAR AWAY.

5.0
3.0
HIST114
Mar 20, 2013

I loved Prof. Woodard's class. He is challenging, but considering that I want to go to law school in a few years, I really appreciate the class. He talks to students like we are his peers, not just some idiots that he is forced to teach. I met him for extra help a few times and found him to be very receptive and helpful. Take his class!

2.0
5.0
HIST116
May 11, 2013

Please do yourself a favor and do not take this class. His lectures are SUPER boring and never have to do with what is going to be on the exams. He requires 4 books and your final is 50% of your grade with only 2 others tests for the other 50. Exams are based off of readings and the map quiz(10%). NOT HELPFUL and totally boring.

4.0
4.0
HIST333
Jul 25, 2013

Be prepared for a challenging class with a lot of reading, studying, and hard work regarding the history of Brazil. Woodard is a pretty strict (assignment/policy wise) and straightforward guy who doesn't take anybodys crap. HOWEVER, don't judge him solely on his classroom demeanor. He's an all-around good guy who WILL help you if you reach out.

1.0
5.0
HIST333
Oct 21, 2013

From the beginning I knew this man was not taking no body's crap. If you are looking for an easy way out, NOT POSSIBLE. DO NOT TAKE THIS MAN! HE IS A TERRIBLE PROFESSOR! Boring, not easy, and certainly WAY TOO MUCH WORK is Given. STAY AWAY STAY! STAY AWAY!

2.0
4.0
HIST116
Dec 11, 2013

SUPER BORING CLASS! he repeats himself most of his lectures and puts you to sleep. attendance isn't mandatory but you do have to do readings for the midterm and final. Grades are accumulated by a map quiz, midterm, and final. He is no an easy A, an average student may be lucky to get even get a C in his class. DONT TAKE HIM!

3.0
4.0
HIST333
Apr 9, 2014

Get ready for a challegning class. The workload is imence and he requries about 6 books for his which you all use. He's very good looking and knows his stuff. Lectures are very interesting but he's tough. Don't come to class unless you did your work because he will call you out and throw you out of class. Studying is a must.

1.0
5.0
HIST116
Grade: C-
Jan 5, 2015

The ABSOLUTE worst class I've have taken in college. Boring lectures, puts you to sleep, and he makes you buy like 5 books for his class including his own published book trying to make money off his students. Class only consist of a midterm and a final which is 5050 and they're both difficult AVOID AVOID AVOID

3.0
5.0
HIST116
Grade: B+
Jan 17, 2015

Lectures are really boring but important to the tests. Attendance is not mandatory. A lot of books are required. One of the most difficult classes I've ever taken but I ended up with a B+ and I'm not the best student. I liked the professor but probably wouldn't take him again unless it was the only class I was taking that semester.

4.0
4.0
HIST
Sep 21, 2015

Extremely Intelligent Man. Great Respect for this Professor.

2.0
5.0
HIST333
Oct 29, 2015

This is the worst Professor I have ever had. First of all he does not actually seem to like or even want to teach and it clearly shows. The reading quizzes are only 5% of your final grade but if you fail 3 you automatically fail the class. Do not take!

1.0
5.0
HITS333
Nov 9, 2015

Pretty awful teacher. Doesn't want to teach and fairly rude to the students. Gives pop quizzes (if you fail 3 you fail the class) and you have to lector the class yourself as as he doesn't.

5.0
1.0
HIST333
Grade: A+
Dec 3, 2015

I really respect this man because he really knows his stuff. The pop quizzes are extremely easy and he is really funny. New York Times bestseller author.

1.0
5.0
HIST333
Dec 5, 2015

A fairly poor class. While he seems like a cool guy personally his class is ridiculous. Half of our class dropped! If you fail 3 reading quizzes you fail the class no questions ask. You will also have to buy many books he had a hand in writing. Someone in our class even had a break down due to this class. Would NOT recommend.

4.0
3.0
HIST116
Grade: A-
Dec 25, 2015

Professor Woodard's class was very informative, albeit a bit boring. He knows his stuff. The class is in lectures and it is HIGHLY recommended to take notes. Most of what he says in lectures can be found one of the textbooks. The class consists of three grades: a map quiz, midterm, and final. I barely used the textbooks and managed an A-.

2.0
4.0
HIST116
Grade: B+
Mar 21, 2016

He knows what he is talking about, very knowledgeable on Latin America. But very very boring, I would not recommend taking him unless you have your own interest in Latin America. He lectures the whole time and his voice is very monotone.

4.0
4.0
HIST116
Grade: A-
Apr 19, 2016

Probably the most boring lectures but he knows what he is talking about and he cracks jokes once in a while. Take notes, pay attention, and study and you should be fine.

3.0
3.0
HIST116
Dec 18, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Nice enough person but terribly boring lectures and way too many textbooks. You have to buy four textbooks and finish one before the midterm. Something I found out the hard way: you have to do 90% of the work yourself. I found it very difficult to take good notes in class and learned more studying on my own. Take this class only if you need it.

Get ready to read
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
LECTURE HEAVY
4.0
4.0
HIST115
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 20, 2017
Would take again

Lecture heavy. Monotonous. A solid professor. Knows his stuff. Would not recommend if you're not interested in history. He's a friendly guy and cracks cheesy jokes no one laughs at. Overall, I would take again.

Respected
Tests? Not many
Would take again
1.0
5.0
HIST116
Dec 30, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Probably the worst class I took in my college career so far. He expects you to just know everything for the tests and does not really go over what is important. He basically just tells stories the entire class instead of making it engaging. The class is very hard. It is not worth it if you do not have to take it. Only 3 grades too. Stay far away.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
HIST333
Jan 6, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Avoid if you can. Woodard is very knowledgeable of the subject matter but the class is very boring and he is strict on the readings because he gives you a quiz after every one of them, if you fail three reading quizzes you fail the class. He is a fairly tough grader. You really have to work hard to get a decent grade in his class.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
1.0
5.0
HIST116
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Feb 15, 2018
Wouldn't take again

STAY AWAY!!! SERIOUSLY. He is the reason I am behind on credits. Had to drop his class because he does. not. teach. There are only three grades so if you do bad on one you're pretty much screwed. He talks to the class like we know what he is saying, even if we have done the reading. It's clear he has no interest in being an engaging professor.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
4.0
HIST118
May 9, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He's a really bad teacher. You get 3 grades all semester, 2 exams and the final. The lectures are really boring and it is really hard to stay awake. The only way to do good is to watch videos or read the textbook. You are on your own in this class and I wouldn't recommend taking it unless you have to. Attendance isn't mandatory.

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
2.0
4.0
HIST333
Dec 6, 2018
Wouldn't take again

First of all Professor Woodard is very knowledgeable about Brazil and its history, however, his expectations are extremely high. He only has a few grades, if you fail 2 things you fail the class even if your final grade was a C. You MUST read the 2 text books or you will fail. He gives very little direction so you are pretty on your own.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
2.0
4.0
HIST116
Grade: F
Dec 18, 2018
Wouldn't take again

So he's a nice enough guy, he just lectures a lot, no homework or quizzes or classwork, just map quiz at the beginning, midterm, and final. Makes you read his own book, not sure if he's an egomaniac or just trying to make a quick buck. Take him if you wanna read and make sure to get a goodnight sleep before class and bring a redbull.

Get ready to read
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
5.0
HIST116
Grade: C-
Dec 19, 2018
Wouldn't take again

Nice person but a horrible professor. I am an honors students and I can barely find the will to deal with this class. Monotone early morning lectures, excessive reading its not worth it. The final is worth half your grade and his grading is horrible. You cannot afford to fail anything.

Tough Grader
Get ready to read
LECTURE HEAVY
1.0
4.0
HIST118
Grade: B
Dec 27, 2018
Wouldn't take again

He has to be one of the worst teachers I have had while at school. A very bad grading system as there is only 2 exams and the book review. He is very smart but he expects you to know all his knowdledge in 3 months. He also makes you buy a book he wrote and makes you take 2 quizs. We have 3 in a semester and if you fail 2 you fail the class. Avoid!

1.0
4.0
HIST116
Grade: B-
May 6, 2019
Wouldn't take again

There is only 3 test he gives. 2 actual test 1 is a map quiz. That's it, I think it's a bad grading system. Ok in the lectures interesting topics, but sometimes can be boring at times. He requires reading, but I didn't really read much and got a B-... so yeah good luck

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
HIST116
May 13, 2019
Wouldn't take again

If you ever have a hard time falling asleep go have a conversation with this man. The problem with him is he looks very uninterested in teaching, there is no enthusiasm, he sounds like he's reading out of a book with no explanation. There are 3 assignments in the class. a map quiz a midterm and a final. his exam questions are like riddles.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
HIST116
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Oct 11, 2019
Wouldn't take again

This class is a drag, all you talk about is brazil, you have to have read the entire book by midterm, and you'll want to drop the class/ withdraw after the first class.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
3.0
HIST103
Oct 17, 2019
Would take again

One of the best professors I have ever had. Very challenging for anti intellectual diversity crowd. But if you actually want to learn something take his course.

Respected
Get ready to read
Test heavy
1.0
5.0
HIST116
Oct 23, 2019
Wouldn't take again

For anyone on campus that still has a working brain, I strongly recommend that no one should take this guy. There's only a map quiz, a midterm, and a final. He gives absolutely no help for the class and expects everyone to read ALL of the textbooks like we have no other classes, live on campus, don't have jobs, etc. Seriously, stay away from him.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
1.0
5.0
HIST116
Nov 4, 2019
Wouldn't take again

DO NOT TAKE this professor. While he didnt assign any homework or take attendance he should not be teaching a level 100 course. He assigns different books for you to read (1 being a book he wrote). Gave a study guide 2 days before the test which was USELESS. 1 map quiz, Mid-Term, and Final and they are pretty impossible to pass!

Tough grader
1.0
5.0
HIST116
Grade: F
Feb 18, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Do not take you will regret it. May be a nice guy but he does not teach and for an intro course his expectations are not realistic. Expects too much written work for his exams 5-6 paragraphs for one essay. Only 3 tests and if you fail 2 you are done. I went to every class although he doesn't take attendance. Ruined my GPA Ridiculous

Get ready to read
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
HIST116
Oct 18, 2021
Wouldn't take again

He assigns 3 books to read at the start of the semester and will make the midterm all about it. Study guides arent well enough. Wont tell you what the midterms are about all they say is the type of questions. Dont take him.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
HIST333
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 27, 2021
Wouldn't take again

V knowledgeable of Brazil, but If you can avoid this Professor. He refuses to use canvas, his lectures are just a monotonous ramble. Rarely do the power points have any useful info & Study guides are useless. Maybe i just take it the wrong way but seems very condescending when you ask him questions. In all honesty his teaching methods are lazy

Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
2.0
4.0
HIS333
Grade: Rather not say
Nov 29, 2021
Wouldn't take again

He gives A LOT of work. Pay attention to the very very boring lectures, take notes, engage and ask questions and you should be fine. Take this class if you enjoy : mostly boring lectures, DENSE readings, the feeling of taking a level 500 class at level 300, low classroom energy, not using canvas, useless study guides & unpassionate teachers

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Tough grader
2.0
4.0
HIST116
Grade: B-
Dec 20, 2021
Wouldn't take again

Only lectures. Doesnt use powerpoints. The entire grade is based on a test, the midterm, and the final.

Get ready to read
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
HIST333
Grade: B+
Jan 3, 2022
Wouldn't take again

Really dull and boring. He could be quite rude at times. Always made you feel dumb when answering questions, even opinion based. The timeline was all over the place and very confusing. Expected our written work to be like grad students. Always late (30 minutes late on final day). He expected us to know a lot of Brazil's history already. Bad prof

Get ready to read
Tough grader
1.0
5.0
CN24531
Feb 11, 2022
Wouldn't take again

HE IS THE WORST PROFESSOR EVER. He is a piece of scum. He does not use power points and he does not even lecture. He forces us to read these boring assignments. Nobody in the class participates because he is boring. I hurt my ankle and couldn't come to class and he was like he doesn't care. Don't take this piece of garbage class. He is very rude.

1.0
4.0
CN24531
Feb 11, 2022
Wouldn't take again

Expects you to read a Whole book in like one day for an assignment like people do not have other classes to take. Plus his breath stinks.

1.0
5.0
CN24531
Feb 11, 2022
Wouldn't take again

LAME, BORING, no lectures, no power points. He is horrible. I don't know why he didn't get fired.

1.0
5.0
CN24531
Feb 11, 2022
Wouldn't take again

I hate his guts. NOBODY in the class ever participates because he is SOOOO boring. I promise you he be talking to himself in class.

1.0
5.0
CN24531
Feb 11, 2022
Wouldn't take again

DO NOT TAKE THIS PROFESSOR. IT IS NOT WORTH UR MENTAL HEALTH

1.0
4.0
HIST103
Feb 12, 2022
Wouldn't take again

He is horrible. WHen I asked him a question because I didn't understand, he called me stupid. Plus he is very boring.

1.0
5.0
HIST430
Grade: C-
Apr 18, 2022

This has to be the worst professor I have ever taken while being here at MSU. He is legitimately mean to his students, and I truly believe he enjoys assigning an obscene amount of work because it was done to him as a student. He is never prepared for class, looks for students to read a book in 3 days then write a paper,15 pg final paper too! INSANE

Get ready to read
Lots of homework
So many papers
4.0
4.0
HIST430
Grade: A
Aug 2, 2022
Would take again

The following review is mostly for History students. He's good if you care about History as a discipline. He works with you if you put in the effort and willing to help during office hours. He's dry and is an academic, not a teacher. But if you truly want to challenge yourself, read more, and improve your writing, take his course.

Get ready to read
Gives good feedback
Lots of homework
2.0
3.0
HIST116
Grade: A+
Apr 24, 2023

super lecture heavy & only had one quiz and two exams. if u fail them theres no way to get grade up. he talks super slow and overall kinda boring but the content was interesting. if u pay attention & take good notes youll be fine. try to participate in class so its not just a lecture. assigns textbook reading but u dont really have to read.

Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
4.0
2.0
HIST116
Grade: A
Dec 12, 2023
Would take again

There is a book you read for the semester, you can find it online for free. Lectures can be tiring, don't come sleepy, attendance is not required but he shares helpful info for the exams. He notices if you don't come xD. He is not rude & the class is interesting!! No homework assigned. Try to keep up and do not procrastinate readings, they help!!

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
2.0
4.0
HONP103
Grade: A-
Jun 3, 2024

The discussions in this course were interesting and thought-provoking, but the teaching style and small class size made it uncomfortable. The readings were lengthy, and speaking up was intimidating if you had nothing to contribute. Additionally, no matter how hard you try (without guidelines or rubric), your papers are going to be graded harshly.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
3.0
2.0
HIST118
Grade: A+
Dec 22, 2024
Would take again

Confused professors. Ignore this review.

Get ready to read
EXTRA CREDIT
Accessible outside class
3.0
3.0
HIST116
Grade: B
Feb 9, 2025

The lectures can be a bit dull, but if you stay engaged and use resources like Unstuck AI for exam prep, you can do well. Attendance is mandatory, but the workload is manageable if you don't procrastinate on the readings.

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

45%

Textbook Required

92%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

B

95% confidence
Based on 20 grades
Most common grades:
C- (3)
B+ (3)
A+ (3)
Grade Distribution
A(5)B(4)C(3)D(2)F(2)A-/B+(6)
Based on 25 reported grades
C-: 3
B+: 3
A+: 3
A-: 3
Common Tags
Get ready to read (23)
Lecture heavy (8)
Graded by few things (6)
Tough grader (6)
LECTURE HEAVY (5)
Tough Grader (5)
Participation matters (3)
GRADED BY FEW THINGS (3)
Rating Trend

Declining

-1.21 avg change
Aug
Apr
Dec
Jun
Dec
Feb
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

HIST117

5.0

(2)

HIST430

4.0

(5)

HIST115

4.0

(2)

HIST

4.0

(1)

HIST114

3.2

(13)
+11 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HIST499

5.0

HITS333

5.0

CN24531

4.8

HIST117

4.5

HIST430

4.2

Similar Professors