3.5

Jen Martin

History - University of California Santa Barbara

3.5
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
61%
Would Retake
88
Reviews
3.5
Quality
2.9
Difficulty
3.5
Helpful
3.4
Clarity

61%

Would Retake

88

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

24

4

28

3

13

2

13

1

10

What Students Say

Her lectures are absolutely boring

HISTORY20 - 3.0 rating

Lectures are unorganized, boring, and overall unnecessary for the midterm and take home essays

HIST20 - 1.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

65%

Textbook Required

0%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 51 grades
Most common grades:
A (29)
Not sure yet (19)
A- (12)
Grade Distribution
A(31)B(0)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(18)
Based on 70 reported grades
A: 29
Not sure yet: 19
A-: 12
B+: 6
Common Tags
Get ready to read (36)
Participation matters (21)
Caring (20)
Lecture heavy (19)
Skip class? You won't pass. (15)
Clear grading criteria (10)
Graded by few things (10)
Inspirational (8)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.01 avg change
Aug
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENVS130C

5.0

(1)

ES130A

5.0

(2)

ES130C

5.0

(1)

ES1

4.0

(12)

HISTORY 20

4.0

(2)
+8 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HISTORY 20

4.0

HISTORY20

4.0

ENVS183

4.0

ENVS173

4.0

HIST20

3.3

Reviews (88)
5.0
3.0
ES1
Jan 30, 2015

Awesome professor! Makes the subject really interesting and is very approachable and helpful if you need it. I took this class over the summer so our midterm was a paper and our final was take home, and more of a series of writing assignments than a test. She's not an easy grader but she is definitely fair and gives good feedback.

4.0
4.0
HISTORY 20
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 23, 2015

Besides attendance is mandatory, she also requests you to speak in section and LECTURE. She will call on you even you don't raise your hand in lecture. If you don't know the answer, she will "come back to you" later. I think she is too much on this aspect... Materials are ok. Lectures are nothing but reading notes conclusions for the book.

4.0
4.0
HISTORY 20
Grade: Not sure yet
Oct 24, 2015

They take attendance by assign writings on lecture. lecture and section participation made up 30% for this course. She treats students as if they are elementary schoolers, keeping forcing students to speak in lecture. Learned most of the materials from the readings rather than her lecture. Wouldn't recommend this course.

2.0
4.0
HISTORY20
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 3, 2015

Lecture is really boring.

3.0
4.0
HISTORY20
Grade: Not sure yet
Nov 12, 2015

Her lectures are absolutely boring. She forces student participation in lecture and section. I thought the class would be interesting based on the description, but was I wrong. WOULDN'T recommend this class for anyone.

4.0
2.0
HIST20
Grade: A-
Dec 3, 2015

Her lectures are really condescending, but aside from that she is really nice and understanding. She tries to make the subject interesting even though it isn't. She calls on people but only if she remembers your name. The reading is not that necessary as long as you skim and get the big ideas.

4.0
3.0
HIST20
Grade: A-
Dec 8, 2015

Prof. Martin cares deeply for the history of science. She also cares for class participation, and will sometimes forego large parts of the lecture in hopes of fostering discussion which can be cringeworthy, at times. Reading is a must. Each lecture includes an in-class writing assignment (hint, attendance). The subject matter is interesting.

4.0
3.0
ENVS108O
Mar 29, 2016

Very nice, passionate about teaching, and is accessible and understanding. However, don't feel like I got much out of the class. Lecture was mostly discussions that centered around students getting called on to speak. The papers (Lots!), especially the 2 book reports, often felt more like busywork than actually helping me learn anything.

2.0
4.0
ES1
Oct 20, 2016
Wouldn't take again

Env S 1 is the introductory course for the environmental studies program so it should be a relatively broad overview of the subject. Not the case with Prof. Martin. While she is passionate about the course, she's a historian so too much of lecture time is spent digressing into very specific stories that she expects you to memorize.

5.0
2.0
ENVS130C
Grade: A
Oct 22, 2016
Would take again

Dr. Martin looks at everything from different perspectives, which I appreciate. No tests, just a few easy papers. Participation during class is a must, which some might find to be a negative aspect, but I really think it makes the class more engaging and interesting! She's very understanding and is fun to talk to. Easy A, great professor.

Respected
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
4.0
ES1
Grade: A-
Dec 3, 2016
Would take again

I abhorred ENVS 1 up until the first midterm, which I found relatively easy considering I did not study very hard. Lectures are suffuse with information and Martin expects you to pay attention to small details; however, her test questions are general enough. Section is mandatory and has a few assignments that require you to put in work.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
LECTURE HEAVY
3.0
3.0
ES1
Dec 11, 2016
Would take again

Goes through lecture slides very quickly and talks about things that aren't on the slides but will be on the tests. Recommend taking notes on what she says during lecture then later taking notes on the slides themselves after she posts them on Gaucho space. Very nice lady, overall decent professor. Would take again.

Skip class? You won't pass.
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
3.0
ES1
Grade: B+
Dec 27, 2016
Would take again

Martin is a really passionate professor that really makes ES1 an enjoyable class. She does give heavy reading assignments that she will give 5 random quizzes on but even if you only skimmed the readings you'll be fine. Her lectures are loaded with info but she posts the slides online so focus on what she's saying more than the slides themselves.

Inspirational
BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES
LECTURE HEAVY
5.0
3.0
ES130A
Grade: A-
Jun 24, 2017
Would take again

Jen is fantastic, super caring and passionate and she wants you to be too. It's not hard to get an A but you have to show up, participate (most classes are discussion-based), and complete the abundant but easy assignments. Midterm/final are easy papers, and the second half of class is a mock summit.

Gives good feedback
Participation matters
Caring
5.0
3.0
ES1
Grade: A-
Aug 4, 2017
Would take again

Jen is an amazing teacher. She is incredibly passionate and encouraging, she learns every student's name, and she appreciates and finds value in every student and their ideas, no matter what. I took this in the summer, when the class was only about 60 people large, so the larger 300+ person lectures during the academic year may differ. Love her!!!

Get ready to read
Inspirational
Amazing lectures
4.0
4.0
ENVS183
Grade: A
Oct 3, 2017
Would take again

I took this class over summer. Grade breakdown: participation & in class writing 25%, key terms exam 10%, exam on readings & films 20%, 6 page film review essay 20%, 8 page take home essay 25%. She learns your name & calls on you even if you don't raise your hand. Participate & do the reading or you'll have a hard time passing! Hard but fun class!

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
5.0
3.0
ES1
Nov 26, 2018
Would take again

Great class, lectures are very educational. Do what your told and you'll be fine.

Participation matters
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
Amazing lectures
4.0
3.0
ES1
Dec 5, 2018
Would take again

Lectures are pretty dense but Martin is great at making everything interesting. The term paper assignment is kind of lame because the rough draft and all the steps before it are worth more than the actual final paper.

Tough Grader
Inspirational
5.0
3.0
ES1
Grade: Not sure yet
Dec 5, 2018
Would take again

Jen Martin is amazing! She is so kind and genuinely passionate about the subjects she teaches. The term paper in this class takes a lot of work, mostly because you have to turn some part of it in every week in section. But it's helpful because it boosts your grade and prevents you from waiting until the last minute to start. I recommend her class!

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
4.0
3.0
ES1
Dec 7, 2018
Would take again

Jen is super passionate and is a great lecturer. She was super helpful in office hours. However, she does talk fast so get ready to type. She makes her lectures relevant and interesting. The term paper isn't bad at all if you keep up with it and the tests are super straight forward. Readings are a portion of the tests!

Clear grading criteria
EXTRA CREDIT
3.0
2.0
HIST20
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 6, 2019
Wouldn't take again

read the description for this class & thought it was cool, BUT I WAS WRONG! all the material is so broad and I dont see the point to this class. she's always calling on people which makes lectures unbearable. goes through slides way too quick and so many readings omg. just take another class and dont be deceived by the description. thats my advice

Get ready to read
Participation matters
GRADED BY FEW THINGS
1.0
4.0
HIST20
Mar 5, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Lectures are unorganized, boring, and overall unnecessary for the midterm and take home essays. She also keeps attendance with a writing assignment for every lecture based on the reading/lecture which is a pain. I wouldn't take it if you can't help it unless you prefer tedious readings and sitting through agonizingly boring lectures.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
3.0
4.0
HIST20
Mar 6, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Many readings due for every class & makes you write about the readings every lecture for attendance & you're graded on details, not just completion. She will call on people in class and wait for you to participate. Information was fairly interesting, but readings can be confusing/overcomplicated. Graded on midterm, a book essay, and 3 final essays

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
2.0
4.0
HIST20
Mar 7, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Professor goes through lecture slides way too quickly, even though a lot of your grade depends on getting the lecture information. The midterm gives you 6 random terms, so you could basically study everything but still get a bad grade if you happen to not know that one term. The material is also very vague, class seemed unnecessarily hard.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
4.0
2.0
ES1
Grade: A-
Mar 14, 2019
Would take again

The class is based off of two exams, a term paper, and two pop quizzes. However, as long as you study and do the readings, you'll definitely do well. She moves a little quickly through the lecture slides but she posts all the slides online. You should definitely go to lecture to learn all the concepts though. Overall really great class and easy A.

Accessible outside class
Amazing lectures
Caring
5.0
3.0
ES130C
Grade: A
Mar 16, 2019
Would take again

JEN MARTIN IS AMAZING. Her class was so eye opening and empowering. She cares so much about her students and that we are actually taking things away from the class. Participation is super madatory but she makes you want to participate. Not the easiest class ever ever but definitely 10000% WORTH IT. Take any class possible w martin.

Participation matters
Inspirational
Clear grading criteria
2.0
4.0
HIST20
Grade: A
Apr 5, 2019
Wouldn't take again

I took this class because i thought it was going to be an easy GE based on her reviews, but it was unnecessarily difficult. The readings were confusing, and the lectures were boring. I do not recommend this for anyone who is looking into taking this class as their easy and chill class for the quarter.

Participation matters
Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
5.0
3.0
HIST20
Grade: A-
Apr 9, 2019
Would take again

Professor Martin has a passion for what she's teaching and she makes lectures exciting and thought-provoking. History 20 is a very unique class that I would recommend to anyone with any interest in science while trying to get a GE out of the way. Definitely one of the best classes I've taken at UCSB.

Get ready to read
Clear grading criteria
Caring
1.0
2.0
ES3
Grade: Not sure yet
May 8, 2019
Wouldn't take again

There is no reason for Jen Martin to be in the ES department. ES1 with her was based off of one research paper. ES3 is based on two books, one of which GLORIFIES colonization. DO NOT take her courses especially for ES.

Get ready to read
2.0
4.0
ES3
May 16, 2019
Wouldn't take again

She talks too fast and reads off of a paper. Only one third of what she says is on her slide, everything else you have to take notes for. Hard to keep up because she goes too fast and gives too much information at once.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
3.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: Not sure yet
May 19, 2019
Wouldn't take again

While she is very approachable, and always willing to engage in conversation, es3 was very poorly structured, lectures grew difficult to follow and difficult to take concise notes on. Expectations on tests not as clear as they could have been. Did an decent job teaching ES1, but there could be better teachers for ES courses.

Lots of homework
Get ready to read
Caring
1.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: Not sure yet
May 21, 2019
Wouldn't take again

ES 3 has been one of the worst classes I've taken at UCSB, if not the worst. The material is seldom interesting, the books glorify colonization, and her lectures are confusing and too fast. She focuses too much on tiny historical details and not the environment, which is the point of the class... Overall, I regret taking intro ES with her.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
4.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: Not sure yet
May 28, 2019
Wouldn't take again

While she gives a good overview of the material at hand, showing multiple opinions/views of the topics, it takes away the scientific aspect of the ES course. I enjoyed her take on colonialism and globalization but in regards to renewable energy, I've been taught contradicting facts in previous upper div courses here.

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
1.0
4.0
ES3
Grade: C+
May 28, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Es3 has hands down been one of the worst classes I have taken at UCSB. Professor Martin seems like a very nice lady however she does not teach this course well. Her lectures are hard to stay focused for more than 30 mins. She says the information way to quick and her slides are not informational at all. Good course objectives, wrong professor.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
1.0
4.0
ES1
Grade: Not sure yet
May 30, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Her lecture slides are very brief and unhelpful. Her explanations focus on history rather than the relationship between the event and how it affected the environment. Honestly, this is just a boring history class. Would not recommend taking this class with Dr. Martin but have heard great things about this class with a different professor.

Get ready to read
1.0
5.0
ES3
Jun 8, 2019
Wouldn't take again

try to avoid her ES3 classes. for sure one of the worst classes i've taken so far. class averages have been low 70s and she says she won't curve...

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
2.0
4.0
ES3
Jun 9, 2019
Wouldn't take again

This class has been the worst one I have taken at UCSB. The prof only reads off of a paper and makes lectures really boring. Slides have barely any info on them so you have to write down a lot of what she says. She talks fast and it's hard to get everything down.

Skip class? You won't pass.
Lecture heavy
2.0
5.0
ENVS3
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 10, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Slides are useless, just random bullet points with no actual info or context. Most information come from a paper she reads off of in lectures, which she reads way faster than my hand could copy down. Throws a bunch of case study at you and expects you to memorize them. test is split into MC, T/F, FRQ aka identifications, and map locations,STAY AWAY

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
1.0
4.0
ES3
Jun 10, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Concept of this class was not hard, but a majority of the questions she chose to ask were more historical (and arguable insignificant) and contributed nothing to my overall understanding of environmental studies. Lecture slides are posted online but have zero explanation to them so going to class is recommended. Not a good teacher for this subject.

1.0
5.0
ES3
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 11, 2019
Wouldn't take again

ugh super frustrating I took this GE as a grade. waaaaay harder than expected and book was way too long, lectures were waaaaay too specific. two midterms and a paper on the long ass book. IDs on the midterms and its not you get 5 and pick 3 its you HAVE TO DO EVERY SINGLE ONE :( sad bc I feel like shes really trying to make the class enjoyable

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
ES3
Jun 11, 2019
Would take again

I thought Jen was a great, caring professor. She is knowledgeable on the course and really teaches you a lot. Yes, she does lecture pretty fast, but you also get to learn so much in 10 weeks. She is passionate and very available for questions and extra help.

Accessible outside class
Inspirational
Lecture heavy
2.0
4.0
ES3
Jun 11, 2019
Wouldn't take again

She tried really hard which I did appreciate but the class was difficult. Mainly difficult because the slides were bare but the lectures were dense so it was hard to go back and review material. If she reads this review in the future, please post more lecture notes!!

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Graded by few things
4.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: A+
Jun 12, 2019
Would take again

very passionate about the subjects she teaches & you are able to learn so much from her teaching methods. Yes, you have to pay attention in lecture and go to class (most of the time haha), and she tends to assign readings, but you really extend your knowledge and perspective of life. Class for ppl interested in the matter, not a GE if u don't read

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Caring
2.0
4.0
ES3
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 13, 2019
Wouldn't take again

2 midterms, final, paper, and section attendance, MC questions on exams are super specific and historical (not related to the core concepts), IDs (essays) on exams are impossible to get full points on (even if you write a lot) books are super long & she takes questions from them that are very detailed so its impossible to remember

Get ready to read
Skip class? You won't pass.
Test heavy
3.0
4.0
ENVS173
Grade: C+
Jun 19, 2019
Would take again

I love her enthusiasm for every subject I've had her in, but an incredibly tough grader. I've written her 4 essays and poured my heart and soul into them and she never grades me above a C. I'm not the world's best writer but I have written some really good papers for her, alas, she doesn't like them.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Tough grader
3.0
4.0
ES3
Grade: A-
Jul 9, 2019
Would take again

Interesting concepts in the class and I feel like Professor Martin really tried her best and is super passionate but I don't feel like this class really contributed to my overall understanding of environmental studies. Lectures and readings are super dense, exams were super specific so it's really difficult to study.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Tough grader
4.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: Not sure yet
May 28, 2020
Would take again

Jen is honestly an amazing professor! Clearly very passionate about ES and this class will definitely broaden your perspectives. Quite a bit of reading to do every week but they are manageable because the assigned readings are so extremely interesting and correspond with the class topics. Super nice as are all the T.A.s for the course.

Get ready to read
Inspirational
Caring
5.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: A+
Jun 6, 2020
Would take again

*took during online spring '20 so may be diff in person* Great prof! Cares a lot abt subject & students. Lectures are v interesting but talks a lot & doesn't have much on slides so gotta listen well. Weekly quizzes on reading 40ish pages/wk (books actually interesting). No midterm/final, just big essay. Interesting class for everyone to take w her

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Caring
5.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: A
Jun 12, 2020
Would take again

*COVID version of class* Loved it! Readings were super interesting; you learn more about the Anthropocene/history rather than technical ES topics though. She is really kind and wants you to succeed. Doable amount of work each week: reading, videos, quiz, forum posts and responses. The forum posts prep you for the big final essay. No midterm/final.

Get ready to read
Caring
2.0
2.0
ES3
Grade: B+
Jun 17, 2020
Wouldn't take again

Her lectures were boring and dry, she read off a piece of paper the whole time. The class was very interesting and it was basically reading 2 books (1498 and the Great Acceleration). I enjoyed both the books but I could not stand her lectures I was going to die from boredom. Her tests are fair but SA graded harshly (depends on TA). Focus on paper.

4.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: A
Mar 29, 2021
Would take again

I am making this rating to emphasize how understanding of student's circumstances Professor martin has been in all of her classes throughout this pandemic. She really makes it feel like our health and well being come first. The classes are interesting enough, but it is her compassion that makes her so wonderful.

Gives good feedback
Graded by few things
Lecture heavy
4.0
2.0
ES3
Grade: A
May 29, 2021
Would take again

Your grade pretty much depends on your TA. Participate in section and go to your TA's office hours to see exactly what they're looking for in the papers. You have to participate in section for full credit anyways, and the material can get pretty interesting. Lectures are pretty boring, but worth going through so you know what the class is all about

Participation matters
Graded by few things
Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 8, 2021
Would take again

The lectures and course content have been super interesting but most importantly the professor has been so kind and understanding about circumstances outside of school. Not too lecture heavy which is great but there is a lot of reading and a decent amount of writing. Would recommend if you're interested in the subject though!

Get ready to read
Caring
4.0
2.0
ES3
Grade: A
Jun 10, 2021
Would take again

Env S 3 was a fun class with Martin. Lots of reading, but low time commitment otherwise. About 1-2 hours of lectures a week, 4 pre-section reflections, and essays for midterm/final. She's clearly super passionate about her work and super empathetic towards students. Would recommend!

Get ready to read
5.0
2.0
ES40
Grade: A
Dec 15, 2021
Would take again

Lectures are sometimes repetitive, but interesting. Martin really wants students to do well and is really student oriented. Not a lot of work outside of the final project which is very freeform. I enjoyed this class, but wouldn't take it if I didn't have to for my major.

Accessible outside class
Caring
4.0
2.0
ES40
Grade: A
Jan 28, 2022
Would take again

Jen Martin is a great professor and ES 40 is an easy class.

Participation matters
Clear grading criteria
Caring
4.0
2.0
ES40
Grade: A
May 7, 2022

She speaks so slowly. Her lectures, although somewhat interesting, are incredibly boring. Her TA's lead the mandatory sections and are super helpful but also extremely tough graders. This class is a quarter-long research project where you can get advice from TA's and prof, but otherwise there is not a lot of structure to the project.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
4.0
2.0
ENVS3
Grade: A
May 7, 2022

Participation in section makes up 20% of the grade. There's a heavy load of articles you have to read each week, discuss, then write a 600-word reflection to, and two 2000-word essays throughout the quarter. Lectures are long and boring because she talks so slow. however, she is definitely a caring professor who wants you to succeed.

Tough grader
Get ready to read
Participation matters
5.0
3.0
ES130A
Grade: A
Jun 1, 2022
Would take again

Her lectures can be dry but she tries her best to make them interesting/interactive and really cares about her students. Super accessible & helpful outside of class and takes feedback seriously. Graded by section participation, big quarter-long project and reflection essay at end. She assigns a lot of reading but not really necessary.

Get ready to read
Caring
Accessible outside class
4.0
2.0
ES3
Grade: Not sure yet
Jun 3, 2022
Would take again

Lectures were interesting but they kinda just ended up restating things in the readings. Not a huge workload. Take this class for an easy GE.

Get ready to read
5.0
1.0
ES40
Grade: A
Jun 6, 2022
Would take again

Very kind professor who cares about her students and takes the time to give positive feedback where it is due. I hope that I can take a class with Prof. Martin again before I graduate.

Gives good feedback
Caring
Respected
4.0
2.0
ENVS3
Grade: A-
Jun 6, 2022
Would take again

Jen was a really kind teacher, and the workload wasn't too bad. Four 600 word write ups, four 400 word reflections, 1500 midterm, and a 2100 final are all the assignments we did- which sucks if you hate writing. In section participation is graded on if you read and discussed with others. Overall the class was great and the lectures were recorded.

Get ready to read
Participation matters
Lecture heavy
4.0
3.0
ES40
Grade: A
Jun 11, 2022
Would take again

Loveee love loved Prof Martin!!! Never been disappointed by UCSB's ES department and she is not an exception! Super cool and very passionate about environmental justice

Participation matters
Amazing lectures
Accessible outside class
5.0
1.0
ES3
Grade: A
Jun 12, 2022
Would take again

I loved this class and prof. She was super nice and organized when lecturing. Assignments only include pre-section and post section reflection (400-600 words) four times in the quarter, a midterm essay, and final essay. This was a super easy class that just required minimal effort, but still very interesting. I truly recommend it.

Amazing lectures
Caring
Graded by few things
5.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: B+
Jun 27, 2022
Would take again

Martin is an excellent professor! The class is super interesting and lectures were posted online due to many covid breakouts in the class. TA Ahn was a super harsh grader so I ended up with a B+ but the assignments themselves are fairly easy. Be ready to write!!!

Amazing lectures
Inspirational
Graded by few things
5.0
2.0
ENVS3
Oct 31, 2022
Would take again

In general, the material is very similar to some of the other ES classes, so if you have taken any ES class before there is going to be some overlap which helps with understanding. There is quite a bit of reading that relates to the lecture and going over it in section made everything more clear. The class itself isn't too bad, a lot of writing.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
ES40
Grade: A
Feb 10, 2023
Would take again

Amazing professor

Amazing lectures
Caring
Respected
5.0
2.0
ES40
Grade: A
Apr 2, 2023
Would take again

Professor Martin is probably my favorite prof at UCSB. Kind, caring, empathetic, and accessible. Lectures were always interesting, and you could tell Martin was passionate about the content. This class is project based, so make sure to start the project early enough. Put in the work and you'll get an A. Overall great class.

Amazing lectures
Caring
Accessible outside class
5.0
3.0
ENVS3
Grade: B+
May 12, 2023
Would take again

Jen Martin is a great teacher. She cares a lot about her students. Her class can get a little boring at times but overall it's a good class to take. There are no midterms or finals. She only makes you write 2 papers. This class isn't too overbearing tbh. I would definitely recommend taking this class if you are trying to finish some GEs.

Clear grading criteria
Caring
Lecture heavy
4.0
1.0
ENVS3
Grade: A
Jun 22, 2023
Would take again

Overall super easy GE. Reading reflections and midterm and final essay were only assignments, but graded pretty hard. My TA was really fun and nice. Class was honestly pretty interesting despite being an engineering major. Lectures not mandatory but did have 10 lecture questions we had to do.

Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
ENVS3
Grade: A
Jun 24, 2023
Would take again

Not always the most interesting class- overall concepts are interesting but lectures can get a bit boring and repetitive. A good class to add for light work and easy A. No exams and 2 papers that have clear instructions. Section participation is huge and mandatory. Lecture participation is required for about 1/2 of lectures. Passionate professor.

Clear grading criteria
Inspirational
So many papers
4.0
2.0
ES40
Grade: A
Dec 16, 2023
Would take again

Professor Martin is awesome! You can tell she really cares about her students. ES 40 is super conceptual and based fully around your research project. Section was based mostly on the project and lecture was more learning about ES critical thinking. Lecture isn't mandatory. Grade is based on your project, presentation, and final essay.

Get ready to read
Caring
4.0
3.0
ES40
Grade: A
Jan 10, 2024
Would take again

Prof. Martin seems to love what she lectures on, and she tried to make every lecture engaging. Grading consists of lecture and section participation, a project presentation, a project on anything environmentally related, and a final paper. Unfortunate amount of work for a lower division class but grading was lenient (depends on TA though).

Clear grading criteria
Accessible outside class
4.0
1.0
ENVS3
Grade: A
Feb 21, 2024
Would take again

This class was extremely easy, I barely put any effort and did 0 readings until writing papers. As a STEM major a welcome break and the concepts are pretty much common sense so you can simply spend a few hours writing the paper and get an A. Take it for area E!

3.0
1.0
ES40
Grade: A
Mar 31, 2024

The material covered in this class was just not very interesting to me. It felt repetitive & similar to other lower div ES classes. Had a lot of freedom on the final project but then was told about a 6 page paper less than a week before it was due during finals. Didn't really need to know the material covered in class for the final

Graded by few things
4.0
2.0
ES40
Grade: A
Apr 12, 2024
Would take again

A lot of lecture material seemed very common sense/boring, never rlly did the readings. Prof. was super passionate abt everything though, and you really get as much out of this class as you put in. Chance to develop project of choice was cool, and grading seemed fair (no project rubric though, which sucked). Great intro to ES program.

Participation matters
4.0
2.0
ENVS3
Grade: Not sure yet
May 28, 2024
Would take again

Takes attendance at lectures, midterm and final are papers with clear prompts for every paragraph which was nice. Some lectures were super interesting like the plantationocene one, others were boring in my opinion. It would be a free A accept for the fact that essay scores are curved (I imagine downwards) to a B.

Tough grader
So many papers
Lecture heavy
5.0
1.0
ES3
Grade: A
Jun 12, 2024
Would take again

Lovely professor and quite interesting material. Took for pre-major req, highly recommend. easy-breezy. Go to lecture and You'll be good! I did the weekly readings, but might be fine if you don't.

Amazing lectures
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
2.0
2.0
ES40
Grade: A-
Aug 7, 2024

Never responded to either of my two emails. Also, my TA graded really hard and took off points for things that weren't even on the rubrics. Really gross project that takes up the whole quarter. Lectures are really boring but attendance is part of your grade so you have to go. If you don't have to take this class, DON'T. Nobody likes it.

Participation matters
Lots of homework
3.0
3.0
ES40
Grade: A-
Aug 19, 2024

Project based, only a few assignments that are based on the project and a final essay about the project. This class is as difficult as you make the project, so do an easy one, trust. Professor stopped uploading lecture slides halfway through, so take notes about the types of evidence. Everything she says you should take notes about is irrelevant.

Graded by few things
3.0
3.0
ENVS3
Grade: A-
Aug 19, 2024

4 short reading reflections, a film review essay, and a final essay about different anthropocene terms. Attendance was measured by answering in class prompt, but you were allowed to miss a couple. Class is mostly about different alternatives for the Anthropocene, such as the plantationocene, which was kind of silly.

1.0
2.0
ES40
Grade: B+
Jan 7, 2025

Martin is a nice enough person, but her course content is out of touch. Her ENVS 3 is simple, just a lot of busy work, but her ENVS 40 class is completely nonsensical. It's supposedly critical thinking, but the final is a subjective mess that's barely related. It's fine if you're just taking a gen ed, but I'd avoid her to save your braincells.

Caring
Accessible outside class
3.0
2.0
ENVS3
Grade: A
Feb 13, 2025
Would take again

Honestly ES3 depends a lot on the TA you have, mine graded really harshly for what it was. Jen's lectures could get kinda boring and attendance was mandatory, but the course concepts aren't too hard to grasp. Watched some interesting films in class and the papers & write-ups weren't too bad. Took it for the ES major but honestly probably a good GE.

1.0
2.0
ES40
Grade: A
Feb 27, 2025

Painful doesn't begin to describe it. Dull slides, tiny text, and the professor reads directly from her notes, tossing in needless jargon. One in-class exam, the rest projects. Each lecture was excruciating.

3.0
3.0
ES40
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 13, 2025
Would take again

Shes passionate about the material but the course itself is all over the place. Your grade is based on a project that you work on the whole quarter but the intial proposal wasnt graded until week 6 so you only get 2 weeks until presentations. The lectures are mainly her reading from her notes. Its not hard to get a good grade but its painful.

Get ready to read
Lecture heavy
Graded by few things
3.0
3.0
ES3
Grade: A
Mar 14, 2025
Would take again

Didn't stop lecture when a student passed out and started seizing in the middle of the hall. I think this speaks a lot about the type of teacher she is--she just doesn't care about her students and their success.

Get ready to read
So many papers
Lecture heavy
2.0
3.0
ES40
Grade: B+
Apr 8, 2025

Very passionate about her lectures, but they weren't applicable. Her ability to pick TA's is awful, the worst i've had on campus. They're incompetent w/ superiority complexes, the way they are grading for lower div classes. Good luck getting your grades back until 2 days before final grades are due in gold, and the quarter is long over!

Tough grader
Participation matters
Caring
2.0
3.0
ES40
Nov 24, 2025

This class is the biggest waste of time. For a lower division, you have a final project, final essay, AND final exam (on every reading shes given...). For that final exam, you need to memorize the author's full names, background (ie. where they studied, accomplishments, etc. ), and the year that their work was published. Its so ridiculous.

Participation matters
Lecture heavy
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

65%

Textbook Required

0%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 51 grades
Most common grades:
A (29)
Not sure yet (19)
A- (12)
Grade Distribution
A(31)B(0)C(2)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(18)
Based on 70 reported grades
A: 29
Not sure yet: 19
A-: 12
B+: 6
Common Tags
Get ready to read (36)
Participation matters (21)
Caring (20)
Lecture heavy (19)
Skip class? You won't pass. (15)
Clear grading criteria (10)
Graded by few things (10)
Inspirational (8)
Rating Trend

Stable

+0.01 avg change
Aug
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Nov
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

ENVS130C

5.0

(1)

ES130A

5.0

(2)

ES130C

5.0

(1)

ES1

4.0

(12)

HISTORY 20

4.0

(2)
+8 more courses
Difficulty by Course

HISTORY 20

4.0

HISTORY20

4.0

ENVS183

4.0

ENVS173

4.0

HIST20

3.3

Similar Professors