3.4

Jiming Jiang

Statistics - University of California Davis

3.4
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
74%
Would Retake
89
Reviews
3.4
Quality
2.7
Difficulty
3.5
Helpful
3.2
Clarity

74%

Would Retake

89

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

30

4

17

3

19

2

13

1

10

What Students Say

Final was a bit harder

STA108 - 4.0 rating

ALL the examples, hw problems, project problems, how to use R (great program btw) etc

STA108 - 4.0 rating
Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

17%

Textbook Required

40%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 22 grades
Most common grades:
Not sure yet (10)
A (7)
A+ (6)
Grade Distribution
A(13)B(2)C(1)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(6)
Based on 38 reported grades
Not sure yet: 10
A: 7
A+: 6
A-: 6
Common Tags
Group projects (13)
Caring (6)
Get ready to read (6)
Hilarious (5)
Clear grading criteria (5)
Respected (4)
Test heavy (4)
Graded by few things (4)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.06 avg change
Nov
Jan
Feb
Mar
Jan
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

STA013

5.0

(1)

STAT100

4.3

(3)

STAT13

4.0

(6)

STATS13

4.0

(2)

STA232B

4.0

(2)
+10 more courses
Difficulty by Course

131A

5.0

STA106

4.0

STATS100

4.0

STA138

3.0

STA108

3.0

Reviews (89)
5.0
4.0
STA13
Feb 12, 2004

really nice man, you can tell he really enjoys stats. easy homeworks and midterms!

5.0
1.0
STA013
Feb 23, 2004

Cool guy, very helpful. Knows his stuff. Really easy tests. Has an accent but can still understand what he's saying. He explains everything in lecture in like 10-15 minutes. After that you can just bounce if you get it. What more could you want?

5.0
2.0
STA13
Mar 17, 2004

Very nice teacher! He explain the material clearly. Highly recommened!

5.0
2.0
STAT13
Mar 18, 2004

No Comments

5.0
1.0
STA13
Mar 31, 2004

You don't really have to go to lecture because he just goes over what's in the book. Just go if you need clarification. Other than that, he's very accesssible for help. Easy class.

5.0
2.0
STA13
Grade: A
Apr 2, 2004

Easy course, easy tests and homework. He is pretty clear and is one of the funniest professors that I've had. He made a 9am class enjoyable. It's an easy, fun class...take it.

5.0
3.0
STAT13
Apr 8, 2004

NO OPEN NOTE MIDTERM .. only open note final (3 pages of notes max) NO OPEN BOOK AT ALL.

5.0
1.0
STATS13
May 29, 2004

Very good class. Too bad I had to sacrifice this class and drop it because of my excessive units.

5.0
1.0
STAT13
Jun 27, 2004

Easy class. Nice professor. If you need this course, take it with this guy.

5.0
1.0
STAT100
Oct 4, 2004

Easy buy HELLA boooooooring!

5.0
2.0
STAT13
Dec 6, 2004

Great professor! Make sure you go to lecture though because he will emphasize certain things more so you can expect to see those topics to be on the exam. Also, he'll tell you what you do and do not need to know. Good lecturer. Just make sure you read the book and go to class.

5.0
2.0
STA100
Dec 27, 2004

Easy, boring class. He allows cheat sheets for exams (one page front & back for MTs, 3 sheets for the final). Good to go to lecture - he explains things more clearly than the book. Nice & funny guy.

2.0
4.0
STA13
Dec 8, 2005

horrible teacher, probably the worst i have ever had at davis yet, writes too small for you to even see, doesnt explain anything, and OH are a joke, its like he doesnt understand english! horrible!! and def not easy even tho it should be

4.0
1.0
STA13
Dec 9, 2005

Now, now. His English is not that bad. An accent is definitely noticeable, but it isn't something that hinders the message from coming across. He teaches well, his exams are clear and easy for the most part, and his practice midterms are similar to the actual ones. If you think this guy's accent is bad, you obviously haven't seen (or heard) much.

5.0
3.0
STA13
Dec 9, 2005

Good God, His english is not bad, you can certainly understand what he is saying. The class is very difficult, but we are in college. The people who had a hard time understanding him probably sat in the back and dicked around. To the person who keeps referring to China - you are an **** and your probably going to fail.

2.0
3.0
STA13
Dec 16, 2005

Seems like a nice teacher, but hard to understand and doesnt explain what he's doing on the board well. Learned more from book than him. Tests were okay, but u need to know how to do every problem or ur screwed. TA's were unhelpful and hard to understand as well. Take another Stats teacher if possible unless if u prefer self-study.

2.0
4.0
STA13
Dec 17, 2005

while professor had good intentions, he was very unclear and i felt like i had to self-teach myself often. ta's were very hard to understand and not very helpful. even though he made practice exams, i felt as if the real ones were tough. maybe he just had a bad quarter, but i would reccommend someone else.

3.0
3.0
STA100
Dec 19, 2005

The professor is easy to understand and is willing to answer questions. I found the class to be easy, but things are easier the second time around. However, I felt that the projects were a waste of time; although useful if you are planing to do any kind of further studies. Over all I'd recommend him.

3.0
1.0
STAT13
Dec 22, 2005

This guy is really boring. I never went to class and I learned everything myself from reading the book. Easy midterms and final. One homework assignment a week with only 6 problems. Discussion is worthless because his t.a's don't speak english. Discussion doesn't count towards your grade. Nice guy though not very organized. Easiest class at Davis.

1.0
4.0
STAT13
Dec 22, 2005

he is not helpful at all. Don;t take him.

3.0
3.0
STATS13
Dec 23, 2005

he sucks, but he tries to create interest but in the end, he still sucks. There is no reason to go to lectures. When i studied for finals, i learned more myself in 40 min than 5 of his lectures.

5.0
2.0
STA100
Dec 25, 2005

Very enthusiastic professor. First midterm was super easy 2nd and final were pretty hard. DO the hw and you'll do fine. Test questions were exactly like hw questions

4.0
3.0
STA100
Dec 26, 2005

The lectures were great, Very clear. His accent was hardly noticeable. Those of you who think his accent is strong, you must be freshmen and will have a difficult time later because it gets a LOT worse. The projects were a waste of time. Definitly do the hw test questions were a lot like hw. Second midterm and final are much harder than the first!

1.0
1.0
STA13
Jan 6, 2006

Barely ever available for office hours. Doesn't know english and when you schedule for an appointment he will not show up. Oh yeah, he sets the grade cutoffs rediculously high to accomidate the cheating in his class

4.0
2.0
STA108
Dec 22, 2006

The booked used for this class really suck making his lectures more difficult to understand. First midterm was super easy though the topics were very hard. Final was a bit harder. Have I mentioned the book suck and every time I see it I want to rip my eyes out?

2.0
2.0
STA108
Dec 29, 2006

He is extremely smart - homework is extremely hard, and yet his exams are not at all difficult. It is not hard to do well in his class if you pay attention to the concepts - it's all theory and no math in Jiang's world of regression. Do no expect him to be helpful in class - but he is very friendly and responsive to questions...

5.0
2.0
STAT100
Apr 20, 2007

VERY SWEET GENTLEMAN. VERY COURTEOUS AND HILARIOUS!

3.0
1.0
STAT100
Jun 10, 2007

His tests are easy, as is the class, but he is not very good at explaining things. I wouldn't have known what he was talking about if I did not already have the equivalent of Stats 13 from transferring here. Class is pretty boring, he can be funny at times though. Luckily the book is pretty clear.

3.0
2.0
STA100
Jun 19, 2007

One of the most boring classes I've had so far. Not even 1/5 of the students went to class b/c it was nearly useless! 1st midterm was easy (96% AVERAGE) but 2nd midterm and final were much harder. Take the HW and projects seriously as they count for 20% of your grade! Old stats websites exist online for extra homework/test practice and solutions!

3.0
1.0
STA100
Nov 17, 2007

I fell asleep 90% of the time and always skip the friday lectures. Boring as hell, but the tests are easy.

3.0
3.0
STA108
Mar 20, 2010

Jiming is very knowledgable and enthusiastic about the subject. The exams were easy. Weekly homework assignments were a hard and time consuming, and it was a pain that we were expected to use a trial version of Minitab for homework assignments, and there was no lab to explain how to use the program. I didn't care for the book. Nice guy though.

1.0
2.0
STA108
Jun 17, 2010

Terrible teacher! I got a C+ in this class and could not tell you one thing I learned. Prof. Jiang is a nice guy but he has no clue how to teach. He never once worked out an example for the class He expect you to be highly skilled in computer programming just to complete the weekly homework. I reccomend you DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS!

4.0
1.0
STA108
Jun 20, 2010

This class was super easy. Although Prof Jiang covered the nitty-gritty derivations of the formulas during lecture, you're not expected to know them. ALL the examples, hw problems, project problems, how to use R (great program btw) etc. were covered during discussion. So go to that (very important that you do!) and you'll have yourself an easy A!

3.0
5.0
STA106
Mar 18, 2011

Coming from an otherwise straight-A student, DO NOT take this class! He didn't do a good job explaining anything, and it seemed to be expected that students coming into the class have extensive statistical knowledge. The homework took hours, the textbook was incomprehensible for a non-math major, and the projects require programming knowledge.

3.0
3.0
STA106
Mar 25, 2011

He used a lot of book examples to clarify calculations that we need know, although his lectures doesn't fully cover what we need to know. He often just provide general formulas. We get practice exams and notesheets, so make sure to take advantage of those. 80 % of the test materials were what we expected. His homework is quite time consuming.

3.0
4.0
STA108
Nov 7, 2012

Okay class. However, he expected the class to know some programming, which I found to be very difficult. Assignments were time consuming.

2.0
4.0
STA131A
Mar 20, 2013

Weekly HW assignments and MT/FINAL. Practice exams resemble test, allows you to use a page of notes. Expect to put in extra effort, Prof Jiang's lectures are very hard to follow. Would have struggled mightily if not for easy class structure.

2.0
4.0
STA131A
Mar 21, 2013

The weekly homework assignments were pretty challenging, but the exams were very fair. He provided sample exams for the class. They were good for practice, but the actual exams were a bit harder. Lectures were sometimes difficult to follow, so there was lot of independent studying for this class. The TA was very helpful for this course.

2.0
2.0
STA108
Jun 6, 2013

The professor definitely knows his statistics, but is not a great instructor. Like what others have said already, it's really easy to get lost in his lectures. I learned more from the book than going to class.

3.0
2.0
STA205
Jun 21, 2013

Knows stats well but sometimes randomly tangents off on useless proofs and skips topics to make us self-learn. Homework is time consuming and repetitive but easier with SAS. Midterm and final definitely had trick questions, and deviates a lot from practice exams. Prof. and TA doesn't always grade consistently across all students and no regrades.

2.0
4.0
STA138
Grade: A
Dec 12, 2013

The lectures are hard to follow, homework is mostly based on whether or not you know how to use R. Tests had many questions that did not parallel the homework or lectures. TA was pretty unhelpful also.

3.0
2.0
STA138
Dec 13, 2013

He's definitely not the best lecturer. His lectures are not clear, and he goes over important concepts way too quickly, so expect to study a lot on your own. The midterms are fair, whereas the final is a little bit more difficult. If you know how to use SAS and have access to it, use it for this class (better than R, in my opinion).

3.0
3.0
STA138
Dec 26, 2013

Lectures sometimes clear, but not all topics were covered with equal depth. Important topics weren't emphasized. Midterms were fairly easy, but final had some unexpected or unseen materials. Recommend to use SAS for homeworks and project, since it's more powerful than R and is what the textbook uses. Overall the class and professor could be better.

3.0
3.0
STA100
Grade: Not_Sure_Yet
Mar 12, 2014

Prof. Jiang clearly knows his statistics, however it was hard for me to actually learn from him. There was not enough practice problems solved by him (too many book examples). I had to self-teach the majority of the course. His midterms and project is fair.

1.0
4.0
STATS100
Mar 19, 2014

Literally the worst professor in the entire world. Do not take this class unless you plan on learning the material on your own time. You can't even understand what he is saying 80% of the time, and accents are never usually a problem for me. Take this class with another professor!

3.0
2.0
STA100
Grade: B
Mar 20, 2014

Not a great lecturer, but really nice and helpful in OH. MT1 will be piece of cake, MT2 and final much harder. Weekly HW and group project help your grade (15% each). Plan on learning from the book, basically.

2.0
3.0
STA100
Mar 23, 2014

Lectures are confusing, don't go to class and study from the book. Tests are easy, final project and homework worth 15% each with 2 homework dropped. Go to the class a lecture or two before MT day and he will give a summary of what you will need to know. Page of cheat sheet for each MT, 3 sheets for the final.. front and back.

2.0
2.0
STA100
Mar 24, 2014

Lectures okay, mostly straight from book. Pretty funny though, keeps it interesting. Need to learn from book on own. Homework very relevant, helps a lot. Project is pretty easy. 15Proj/15HW/15MT1/15MT2/40Final. Grades pretty easy. Final/MT2 much harder than MT1. 1 pg notes both MT, 3 pg notes final. Don't need to go to class.

4.0
2.0
STA100
Apr 2, 2014

His lectures are kind of confusing. Since he teaches from the book, just study that instead. The exams are fair and similar to the practice ones.

2.0
5.0
131A
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Jun 3, 2015

Class was spent solely on examples, never concepts. Expected us to know what was never taught. Disorganized while writing and explaining. Avoid if possible.

5.0
1.0
STA131A
Oct 2, 2015

Good instructor. I like his class. Her notes are good.

4.0
1.0
STA131A
Oct 26, 2015

He's very smart. Great lecturer, very helpful and explains examples well. Course materials aren't hard. Weekly homework assignments are very helpful as well.

4.0
2.0
STA131A
Grade: A+
Dec 15, 2015

I had an amazing TA so the class was a lot better than expected. Weekly homework. The first couple of weeks of the course is super easy. After the midterm, it gets super hard. TA gives sample problems that are similar to homework which is useful. Midterm was a lot more easy than the final. Jiang has neat handwriting but he writes all over the board

5.0
3.0
STA131A
Grade: A+
Dec 16, 2015

Jiang is amazingly helpful after class, in office hours, and if you make appointments with him. Post-midterm, the class began to feel rushed though, with minimal examples (not including discussion). The final was certainly more difficult and involved than the midterm, but it was curved. Would recommend Jiang for any statistics course.

2.0
1.0
STA108
Grade: A
Mar 25, 2016

Lectures were close to useless but class was extremely easy. Just read the textbook and study the subjects that he tells you will be on the midterm or final. No surprise questions, everything is generally straightforward.

4.0
2.0
STA108
Grade: A+
Mar 30, 2017
Wouldn't take again

Very easy grader. Doesn't give too much feedback. Very receptive to questions. Posts helpful lecture summaries. Assigned homework was a good learning tool. Unfortunately, the lack of feedback on projects and a trivial midterm makes you come out of the class questioning how much you actually learned even with a high grade.

Respected
Inspirational
GROUP PROJECTS
4.0
2.0
STA108
Grade: A-
Apr 4, 2017
Would take again

The class was generally straightforward. And the weekly homework was helpful in understanding the material(the TA helped a lot during discussion). Generous curve overall.

Respected
LOTS OF HOMEWORK
Caring
4.0
3.0
STA108
Mar 22, 2019
Would take again

To be honest, he's not a great lecturer; I mainly relied on his lecture summary notes. His exams are pretty straightforward, just look at the summary notes. First midterm was easy, but the final was tough. He's a nice guy and super receptive to questions!

Gives good feedback
Respected
Get ready to read
3.0
2.0
STA232B
Apr 1, 2019
Would take again

He lectures material too much from his own research topics. Also, his lectures are from projector slides so it's kind of dull. Grading was easy because of TA Po. Final project very long

Hilarious
1.0
5.0
STA108
Grade: Rather not say
May 8, 2019
Wouldn't take again

Horrible professor. His exams are tough yet he doesnt lecture well or give enough relevant example problems. His TAs are lazy and dont even bother to try hold a decent discussion.

Lots of homework
Test heavy
Group projects
5.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: Not sure yet
May 13, 2019
Would take again

I really like Professor Jiang's class. You can tell he's passionate about what he teaches and research on from his teaching. Class is very well-organized and full of examples. I personally like his way of teaching by giving a lot of examples because it's much easier to understand a new concept. Midterm 1 is easy and the average is 80+.

Gives good feedback
Inspirational
Clear grading criteria
2.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: Drop/Withdrawal
Jun 12, 2019
Wouldn't take again

He tries but is not a very good lecturer. Class had only one midterm, 2 group projects, and weekly homework assignments.

Accessible outside class
Get ready to read
Graded by few things
4.0
2.0
STA108
Jun 18, 2019
Would take again

He is an ok professor. Not the best lecturer, but he tries. One midterm and two group projects. BEWARE OF WHO YOU PARTNER WITH ON THE GROUP PROJECTS because they can make or break your grade on them. Easy midterm and final just be sure to study. No curve since averages are too high.

Graded by few things
Test heavy
Group projects
5.0
2.0
STA108
Grade: A-
Jun 19, 2019
Would take again

He is a very caring and generous professor. His lecture is simple, but we need to pay some time study after classes. One Easy midterm and a hard final. But he is an easy grader.

Respected
Group projects
Caring
4.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: A-
Jun 19, 2019
Would take again

The class was okay, professor is good and tas were also good. The reader in this class was a tough grader though. Two group projects, weekly HW, one midterm, and one final. Midterm was supper tedious thus being tricky b/c of the time constrain. Final was a bit tough but doable. Group projects and HW were relatively easy.

Group projects
Clear grading criteria
Hilarious
5.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: A+
Mar 12, 2020
Would take again

Jiang is funny, caring, and always stops whatever he is saying to answer your question in class, then picks up where he left off without skipping a beat. One easy midterm, one final (ours was cancelled), two easy projects-provided you pick a good partner- and weekly homeworks. Best professor I have had at Davis! Highly recommend.

Gives good feedback
Amazing lectures
Caring
1.0
2.0
STA108
Grade: A-
Mar 22, 2020
Wouldn't take again

It pains to write this since I liked the class, but I need to voice how unfair the covid19 grading situation was. The class is a joke and everyone gets an A, but since there was no final, he curved down by 5 percent, implying that only a 98 or above is an A. It was super inconsiderate in the midst of a pandemic, and despite having a 95 I got an A-.

3.0
2.0
ECS122A
Grade: A
Mar 22, 2021
Would take again

Professor Jiang is super caring and accommodated the class to virtual learning really well! The lectures are well thought out and well paced. The assignments and exams are really similar to the material covered during lecture (usually). The grading is also very generous as lots of partial credit is given on assignments and exams.*

Caring
EXTRA CREDIT
5.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: A
Mar 25, 2021
Would take again

The course is not hard and the professor explains everything clearly. You can also review the lectures(materials) through the codes in discussion and the homework.

5.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: A-
Mar 29, 2021
Would take again

Great teacher. Grading can be rough at times, but I think he accounts for it in the final grade cutoff. Lectures are quite helpful and he's really happy to answer questions. Prof. Jiang & his TA were forgiving during the exams on multiple levels. Definitely one of the better professors in the stats department at UCD, I highly recommend him.

Group projects
Clear grading criteria
Caring
5.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: A-
Mar 21, 2022
Would take again

Really good professor. His lectures are fantastic especially since he's one of the few to actually give written examples. 7 homeworks with the lowest 2 dropped. 2 easy group projects using R. 1 easy midterm but a pretty difficult final. Good curve and overall one of the best professors in the stats department,

Group projects
Amazing lectures
3.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: A
Mar 21, 2022

I came into this course with no stats background and it was pretty rough. I feel like the lectures did not explain underlying concepts that well and his lecture notes were not very easily understood. I relied on textbooks and TA's discussions to do all hws and study for tests. Tests were a bit tedious but fair, they are weighed heavily though.

Get ready to read
Group projects
Test heavy
5.0
3.0
STA108
Mar 27, 2022
Would take again

Pretty easy class and learned a lot. 7 homeworks, 1 easy midterm, 1 difficult final. Great lectures as well.

4.0
2.0
ECS122A
Grade: A+
Mar 31, 2022
Would take again

Professor Jiang gives clear and detailed lectures and easy assignments with generous grading criteria. Sometimes there may be exception, but it should be acceptable.

Clear grading criteria
5.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: Rather not say
Nov 17, 2022
Would take again

Lecture was a bit bland, but he did have his moments of being unexpectedly funny. All the lecture notes for the course are uploaded at the beginning of the quarter. Not super difficult, but definitely a bit boring.

Group projects
Hilarious
1.0
5.0
STA108
Grade: Not sure yet
Jan 18, 2023

The whole class is disorganized. I don't know why he has such a high score but RUN if you have only taken sta 13 before. Seems like he assumes everyone knows a lot about statistics. He never explains what the new symbol comes out stands for, mostly you have to google it or search from the book.

4.0
5.0
STA108
Grade: Not sure yet
Feb 24, 2023
Would take again

He's a good lecturer in all honesty this class will be tough if it is your first time doing upper division Stats. I recommend you do some review of Statistical concepts before taking this class. Learn some R studio too because you will need it in class to do the homework. He post lecture summaries and recorded lectures so you can catch up.

Get ready to read
Test heavy
Graded by few things
1.0
5.0
STA108
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 10, 2023

Nothing you learn from the lecture is relevant to the assignment. The assignment is all about R code but he asks us to print that out and submit it in class. The discussion handout probably helps a little with your homework but don't expect TA will explain those codes to you. I really don't know how he got such a high score here.

1.0
4.0
STA108
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 10, 2023

Absolutely the worst professor in UCD I've ever met!!!!!! The whole course is disorganized, every class I just sit there listening him read concepts and formula from teh textbook without a proper explain as a university lecture! Luckily, I've took STA 106 which is the second part of the textbook, so that at least I have a little clue of the class.

1.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: Rather not say
Mar 10, 2023

Reading the textbook is more helpful than the lectures, and the lecture summaries are hard to understand. Why theis professor has a such high rate? You can learn nothing from this class.

4.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 10, 2023
Would take again

Lecture does get confusing every now and then and you may need to search the concepts up a bit further outside of class to understand it. R code is not taught much in class but is mainly presented in discussion sections. The professor overall though was pretty good and had really good enthusiasm throughout his lectures.

Group projects
Clear grading criteria
5.0
1.0
STA108
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 10, 2023
Would take again

Absolute legend! Professor Jiang is amazing, knowledgeable and funny. Very easy to do well in this course if you put in the effort. You my friend, will not regret this class.

Group projects
Amazing lectures
Hilarious
4.0
4.0
STA108
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 11, 2023
Would take again

I'm surprised by the slew of negative ratings this guy got. I thought he was good. He really tried to explain a very tough subject as clearly as he could and I felt he was overall very fair with what he asked of us. I do wish he could actually go over problems rather than reference the same Toluca problem repeatedly. R projects were tedious, though

Graded by few things
4.0
4.0
STA108
Grade: C
Mar 12, 2023
Would take again

No upper div stats class is "easy". He teaches alright and has lecture summaries about his lectures. Read the book before coming to class it helps. For the R portion of the class learn some stuff on your own you'll need it. Overall not an awful class but not "great" or amazing either. Remember this is UC Davis so study on your own to understand.

Group projects
Lots of homework
Lecture heavy
5.0
4.0
STA108
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 24, 2023
Would take again

Professor Jiang is overall a great lecturer as long as you attend the class you will be fine since the lecture summaries might be confusing. 2 main straight forward group project, one easy midterm and one tricky final. Overall very caring, responsive, and passionate over his students and statistics.

Get ready to read
Group projects
Caring
5.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: A
Mar 26, 2023
Would take again

Very kind instructor. This is the first high-level course I take at UCD and I survived. His lectures are easy to understand and always have clear summaries on Canvas, making reviews easy. Exams are easier than homework and practise exams are helpful. Homework needs coding and his TA has very good interpretation of the coding topics in R.

Group projects
Amazing lectures
Inspirational
5.0
3.0
STA108
Grade: A+
Mar 30, 2023
Would take again

Awesome professor YOU MY FRIEND WILL NOT REGRET THIS CLASS.

Get ready to read
Amazing lectures
Hilarious
3.0
4.0
STA108
Grade: B
Jan 30, 2024
Would take again

Homework very long, lectures are good and notes are concise, midterm wasn't difficult, but the final exam will tank your grade. The class would definitely be considered hard, but outside of that I wouldn't really say I had anything outstanding or problematic to speak on the class.

Tough grader
Lots of homework
5.0
3.0
STA232B
Grade: Not sure yet
Mar 6, 2024
Would take again

Jiming is a legend! He is a very bright guy with lots of fantastic stories to help motivate the material learned in class. He is a undoubtably an accomplished researcher and most of the material covered in the course is related to previous work he has done. He know his stuff! You my friend are a great teacher!

Class Info

Online Classes

100%

Attendance Mandatory

17%

Textbook Required

40%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

95% confidence
Based on 22 grades
Most common grades:
Not sure yet (10)
A (7)
A+ (6)
Grade Distribution
A(13)B(2)C(1)D(2)F(0)A-/B+(6)
Based on 38 reported grades
Not sure yet: 10
A: 7
A+: 6
A-: 6
Common Tags
Group projects (13)
Caring (6)
Get ready to read (6)
Hilarious (5)
Clear grading criteria (5)
Respected (4)
Test heavy (4)
Graded by few things (4)
Rating Trend

Stable

-0.06 avg change
Nov
Jan
Feb
Mar
Jan
Mar
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

STA013

5.0

(1)

STAT100

4.3

(3)

STAT13

4.0

(6)

STATS13

4.0

(2)

STA232B

4.0

(2)
+10 more courses
Difficulty by Course

131A

5.0

STA106

4.0

STATS100

4.0

STA138

3.0

STA108

3.0

Similar Professors