2.1

Joe Weiss

Sociology - University of Washington

2.1
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
N/A
Would Retake
111
Reviews
2.1
Quality
3.2
Difficulty
1.9
Helpful
2.2
Clarity

N/A

Would Retake

111

Reviews

Rating Distribution
Official

5

7

4

12

3

18

2

34

1

40

What Students Say

Obvious he doesn't care about students so unhelpful and directs ALL questions to his TA's

SOC275 - 3.0 rating

" when your answer is completely wrong

SOC275 - 5.0 rating
Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

74% confidence
Based on 8 grades
Most common grades:
A (4)
A+ (2)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(6)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 9 reported grades
A: 4
A+: 2
B: 1
Incomplete: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.74 avg change
Mar
Jun
Sep
Mar
May
Jun
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

SOC

5.0

(1)

SOC271S

4.0

(1)

SOCIOLOGY

4.0

(1)

MURDERSOC275

4.0

(1)

275

3.0

(1)
+17 more courses
Difficulty by Course

SPORTDELINQUEN

5.0

21063SOCOF

4.0

SOCIOLOGY275

4.0

SOS271

4.0

SOC200S

4.0

Reviews (111)
4.0
3.0
SOC271S
Apr 28, 2003

No Comments

1.0
3.0
SOC222
Jul 28, 2003

No Comments

2.0
4.0
SOC222
Nov 24, 2003

No Comments

1.0
4.0
SOC275
Feb 10, 2004

No Comments

1.0
4.0
SOC271
Feb 11, 2004

If you are at all interested in Social Deviance and are thinking about taking the class with Joe Weiss, allow me to slap some sense into you. This is by far the most disorganized class I have ever seen. Avoid this class like the plague!!

2.0
3.0
SOC271
Mar 1, 2004

the lectures are boring and dont really go anywhere... this guy is soooooooo arrogant and if you ask him a question likes to refer you to the TAs. Gets a kick out of swearing and acting like he's hip

1.0
3.0
SOC271
Mar 25, 2004

I was really looking forward to this course but weis totally ruined it... He goes off in too many directions in lecture and really doesn't care about anyone but himself!!!

3.0
3.0
SOC275
Mar 26, 2004

A very interesting subject, difficult to do well on tests even with extensive studying, I've seen certain ppl get preferential treatment, but overall I found the class interesting and the help from Police Officer Reichert very useful.

1.0
4.0
SOC271
Apr 13, 2004

the worst prof ever...have no idea how he got tenure...the best time waster ever!

3.0
3.0
SOC222
May 13, 2004

I've had 2 classes with him, (murder and sport) and he does swear a lot which can be funny at times. Both were very interesting, but I can see where he can come off as arrogant and he isn't the most helpful guy ever. Just don't ask him questions in class!

5.0
4.0
SOC275
May 22, 2004

This is not an easy class to do well in but the topic is very interesting. weis is a dry lecturer but very knowledgeable. if you don't mind working hard this is a great course. just do the readings!

2.0
4.0
SOC222
May 25, 2004

sooo boring. doesn't review for tests

3.0
1.0
SOC222
May 27, 2004

Easy ass class. Just read the prof's book (which, of course, is the book for the class) and the tests are a breeze. All the apparent dislike for the prof doesn't really apply to me, since I never go to class except for the tests. You won't either.

3.0
5.0
SOC275
Jun 5, 2004

Class is easy.. Sociology majors are just dumb if they think this is hard.

1.0
5.0
SOC275
Jun 9, 2004

Hot soc teacher, a great intro course

5.0
1.0
SOC
Jun 9, 2004

You idiot! 1 is the worst score you can give someone!

1.0
1.0
SOC275
Jun 9, 2004

exactly!

3.0
3.0
SOC222
Jun 27, 2004

Bad teacher, but thats okay because he is so dahm easy!

1.0
4.0
SOC271
Jun 29, 2004

The most horrible professor ever. His book was poorly written and published, he didn't give a damn, he talked negatively and downwarm toward students. Awful. Evil Man.

1.0
1.0
SOC275
Jan 26, 2005

Class is really boring...so is Weis. The guy is kind of a jackass to his students. Also, he writes (compiles) his own book and rips students off with it. It doesn't appear that he is into teaching at all, he just wants to sell his book. Easy class though...

1.0
3.0
SOC271
Feb 15, 2005

Weiss tests primarily on the unimpressive essays he wrote, his own deffinitions of terms, and on the concepts he made up. Be wary that is egotism is far greater than his intellect.

2.0
2.0
SOC222
Mar 9, 2005

Favors athletes because he was one himself. Expects you to remember the smallest little facts from the text or lecture for his tests. Not a huge fan of this guy.

1.0
3.0
SOC275MURDER
Apr 28, 2005

Horrible! The TAs also clearly disliked him as well because he would drive them nuts with all sorts of backwards bologna. Do the pass/fail option if you can because the exams are obscure and his lectures are awful. Guest lecturers were great; don't miss these days. VERY disrespectful to students.

2.0
2.0
SOC275
May 31, 2005

Totally full of himself, and compactly condescending to students. ¬–The class has the potential to be interesting, but there was just no interesting / relevant content presented in class. He usually ended up talking about work he did or what he thinks of murder. He has a huge issue with cell phones also… so make sure to turn off your phone.

3.0
4.0
SOC275
Jul 1, 2005

you would think the murder class would be easy, but he some how manages to make it hard. his lectures are really boring, and although the material seems like common sense, the tests are REALLY hard. even if you do all of the readings and get to use your book in class, it's not enough. there is a lot of boring reading required.

1.0
2.0
SOC275
Jul 1, 2005

Wow, can you say LAMEST professor EVER? His frequent and flagrant displays of arrogance constantly interfered with his lectures. His lectures mainly consisted of his own personal meandering thoughts...which you were tested on. Random tests. No 4.0s. All of my fellow classmates agreed he was the worst prof. EVER and his TAs hated him too. Ugh!

1.0
3.0
SOC220
Aug 22, 2005

Weiss is a horrible instructor and a scam artist...$90 bucks for a non-refundable paper back plagarized error-filled fall apart required text. Still can't believe that mess. Oh! and u know where he got his info? 3rd floor Odegaard word for word! His tests are crap & lectures r pointless. Unless u r going up to bat, they don't prepare u 4 squat!

4.0
3.0
SOCIOLOGY
Aug 30, 2005

Funny guy, liked the class... but I am a soc major

1.0
3.0
MURDER
Grade: A+
Aug 30, 2005

he's a total **** that mocks you when you ask a question, especially if it's a good question. extremely arrogant. the topic is awesome, take it if bob keppel is teaching it instead.

5.0
3.0
MURDER
Aug 30, 2005

excellent subject knowledge & keeps class VERY VERY interesting: take any class he offers (and murder if you can get in)

4.0
1.0
SOC222
Aug 31, 2005

Soc of sport rules!! Easy class, fun topics, the class composition was a ton of athletes which made it even more interesting to hear their point of views on the issues at hand.

2.0
4.0
SOCOFSPORT
Sep 1, 2005

potential to be interesting w/ a diff. prof. montone voice puts u to sleep. if not, utterly confused by his rambling and unecessary info (which ur tested on). likes athletes. arrogant, and lectures from the book he wrote (makin $ off students)

1.0
5.0
MURDER
Sep 1, 2005

is the only professor i do NOT RECCOMEND!!!!!!!! Just horrible.

1.0
5.0
MURDER
Grade: A
Sep 4, 2005

Horrible, horrible class. He is arrogant and his lectures are not the least bit helpful. The exams are composed of useless multiple choice questions that are too difficult even if you have read every word of the text he wrote for the class.

2.0
2.0
SOCIOLOGY222
Grade: A
Sep 5, 2005

Day 1 I thought he was a good prof. But as the classes went on it became clear he had a big head, definitely thought he was all that & a bag of chips. goes off on various tangents throughout class that detract from the lecture. His slideshows which a

2.0
2.0
SOC222271
Sep 6, 2005

Doesn't talk about what is in the book or what he tests on really. He just kinda rambles about the same old**** over and over again. The tests aren't particularly hard but it's hard to know waht you need to actually know for them.

1.0
3.0
SOC271
Grade: B
Sep 7, 2005

Weiss can talk about nothing for a surprisingly long time to a large crowd of faceless university students. The only plus I would give to Weiss is truly for his underlings--the TAs who, if you get a good one, will simply outline everything you need to kno

4.0
2.0
MURDERSOC275
Sep 10, 2005

One of the few classes that I 4.0'd so pretty easy. However he was clear and the class was fun. Plus he promised to kick any fool out of the class who left their cell phone on and got a call during class and got a call.

1.0
3.0
SOC222
Sep 11, 2005

This guy is worthless. He puts other author's articles in a book, slaps his name on it, and requires them for his class to make an extra buck. His lectures have nothing to do with the tests, goes off on random tangents. He and his TAs have horrible grading systems for the assignments. Abiguous questions on tests. Doesn't control his roudy classes. Uses painful mic feedback to get peoples attention. And Im not one of the jocks who took the class thinking it would be fun/easy, I didn't miss a lecture.

4.0
2.0
MURDER
Sep 15, 2005

No Comments

1.0
5.0
MURDER
Sep 20, 2005

No Comments

2.0
4.0
21063SOCOF
Grade: A
Oct 2, 2005

Lame jokes. Not good at teaching. Doesn't edit his books, yet they cost a fortune...the list goes on.

2.0
5.0
SPORTDELINQUEN
Oct 25, 2005

sport is the worst class ever, he has no right teaching a class and all his books present info and then after you read it all and start to rely on it he states: "but this info is not supported so we CAN"T rely on it". Awesome...not

4.0
2.0
MURDER
Oct 25, 2005

No Comments

1.0
4.0
MURDER
Nov 26, 2005

I hated his class and so did everyone that sat near me. His lectures were so boring! I don't know how he made the topic so dry. He was mean and his tests never followed his lectures!

1.0
4.0
SOC275
Dec 21, 2005

He is the worst teacher I've ever had in my life, and he turned what SHOULD HAVE BEEN an interesting class into a snorefest. He thinks he is the coolest and most important person to ever exist, but he actually sucks.

1.0
4.0
SOC271
Jan 18, 2006

Sociology of Deviance should be interesting, but this is the most boring class I have ever taken, and half the time I have no idea where he is going with a topic nor how he got there. I can hardly stand going for the two hour-and-a-half lectures a week. The textbook is an $85 dollar door-stop, beside. This class is excruciatingly painful.

2.0
1.0
SOCOFSPORT
Feb 27, 2006

This guy is the most ridiculous man alive. He loves being infront of a class, for him it's an audience, but that makes the class so much more interesting. It was a lot of fun.

1.0
4.0
SOCIOLOGY275
May 1, 2006

Weiss is the epitome of University of Washington is snobbery, First Class. When students are ridiculed in front of 500+ peers for asking commonsensical, legitimate questions you've got to ask yourself what kind of an education you're paying for. Wait to be enthralled with his "days at Berkeley" or left uncomfortable by misplaced vulgarity.

2.0
2.0
SOC271
May 15, 2006

The readins were ridiculous and his lectures were so boring! He also "writes" the book and you can't sell it back because he changes it every quarter.

2.0
2.0
SOC275MURDER
May 23, 2006

The lectures and the readings were ridiculously dull, barring the Bundy-Ridgeway book. I might call the class, not so much the Sociology of Murder, but rather, Weiss Ranks on People for Asking Stupid Questions. Often lectures will put you to sleep, but they're worth going to for the little gems of hilarity he drops every now and again.

2.0
1.0
SOCOFSPORT
Jun 3, 2006

This class is a joke!! This prof. is a joke!! He reminds me of a high school football coach that the school has to give a job in order for him to teach football. He knows nothing about what he is teaching. He stands in front of the class and reads quotes that make anyone playing sport seem like a total idiot! He just wants to hear himself talk.

1.0
5.0
SOC275
Jun 9, 2006

Wies sucks and so do his sycophantic TAs! One in particular told me that he makes sure no one ever gets full credit in the class to make sure that "we're always learning". Lectures and CLUE sessions were colorless and used as pedestals for constant ego-boosting. BEWARE!!!

3.0
2.0
SOC271
Dec 5, 2006

Most boring and pointless class I have taken. Everything you will learn should already be common sense. I went to 4 lectures total simply b/c he bored me out of my mind. Read the book and you'll be fine.

1.0
3.0
SOC371
Jan 21, 2007

No Comments

1.0
3.0
SOC271
Mar 8, 2007

ratings = need i say more? if you ever go to the lectures, which are as useless as useless can be, at least take your textbook and read the material.

1.0
2.0
SOC271
Mar 12, 2007

This teacher is an idiot. He carries on in a condesending aire and doesn't take teaching seriously. People are (not suprisingly) sleeping through his lectures. The whole experience was pretty bad. At least I'll get like a 3.7 because the class is so easy a moron could pass without ever opening the book.

1.0
2.0
SOC271
Mar 19, 2007

Prof Weis is the most boring lecturer I have ever encountered at UW. His lectures are unhelpful and boring; the lecture slides consist of a picture of the person he's talking about, but no helpful information on what he's saying. He wanders off track and spends most of the time talking aout irrelevant things. Do not take any of his classes!!! He wi

2.0
2.0
SOC222
May 17, 2007

Wasn't a 5 on the Easy scale only because the book he wrote is so boring it is hard to read! It took me so long just to make it through a chapter. Going to class is pointless, most of it is common sense. Just struggle through the book and you'll be fine. Class could be a lot more fun/interesting given the subject! :(

2.0
5.0
SOC222
May 19, 2007

Don't ask for open book tests. They are really hard-- even though he may say it is as easy as it would be if no notes were allowed.

3.0
4.0
SOC222
Jun 6, 2007

Do not follow what I did and dismiss what people said about Weiss on here. I figured there was no way he could make a Sociology of Sport class bad, but he did. I regret taking this class and advise those who do not enjoy reading boring textbooks/getting a poor grade to refrain from registering for SOC 222.

1.0
4.0
SOC275
Jun 7, 2007

Spends more time telling stories than teaching.

3.0
3.0
SOCI275
Jun 7, 2007

This man is fully the most useless prof at UW. While he is busy being "cool", he rambles on lightly about topics that he will test heavily on. Go to his visiting professor's lectures, Dr Keppel, and read the book thoroughly. Skip Weis's lectures as they are boring and filled with him "getting in the classes****" as he says and being obnoxiouxious.

1.0
5.0
SOC271
Aug 8, 2007

Worst teacher of my life... save your grade, and take another class.

3.0
2.0
SOC220
Jan 11, 2008

Soc of sport was okay, and moderately interesting. I generally speaking found the class kind of boring, but the tests and quizzes were easy enough, and I just read every other paragraph in the text

2.0
4.0
SOC222
Feb 18, 2008

So I just took the firs test, and I thought that the class would be easy, seeing as there are plenty of athletes in teh class. However, test was very hard as he wanted specific answers from each article in the book. I did pretty good considering the average was a 30ish. Only one person got 43, no one scored higher.

1.0
5.0
SOC222
Feb 25, 2008

No Comments

2.0
5.0
SOC222
Mar 7, 2008

This class is not worth anyone's time. Weiss is what can be called "Mr. Personality", and thats about it. I haven't learned anything of interest from his class. The quizzes and tests are questions pulled completely randomly from the books, and are of no use to anyone.

3.0
3.0
SOC222
Mar 7, 2008

I don't know what everyone's talking about - I like him. Sure, his book might be boring at times, but he's always got interesting things to say in the lectures. You have to go to class to understand the tests at all, but they are not too bad. I thoroughly enjoyed this class.

4.0
4.0
SOC222
Mar 11, 2008

I found this class very interesting, which is good because attending lecture was important for the tests. Tests were hard and questions were very specific, but as a whole the class did poorly so the final grade was curved. I would not recommend if you don't like reading the text or attending class.

2.0
4.0
SOC222
Mar 12, 2008

This class is a joke. I came to this class ready to learn and I attended almost every lecture and the tests had nothing to do with the crap that he was saying. I am a very big sports fan, but he still made it lame. I didn't listen when everyone told me not to take this class. Please don't make the same mistake as I did and take this class.

5.0
1.0
SOC275
Mar 25, 2008

We're all winners in God's eyes!!

3.0
5.0
SOC222
Apr 4, 2008

You will learn more by reading the books, but when the exam comes, you won't really know what to study because the questions are too detailed and sometimes will ask specific numbers. At the same time, some of the answer choices to some of the questions were very much similar to one another. The speakers and the videos were enlightening.

2.0
3.0
SOC275
May 20, 2008

Don't take this class. You would think that "Murder" would be interesting, but Weis makes it completely boring and what you "learn" is useless. You also have to read a few crappy books. Lectures are horribly painful.

4.0
2.0
SOC275
Nov 7, 2008

This class is VERY interesting! He has his funny moments. Some people say he is harsh, but there's not really a "nice" way to teach about murder. I hardly used the textbook and did well. The novel he gives actually needs to be read but it's interesting. If you're interested in criminal justice it's a great class for you!

2.0
4.0
SOC275
Nov 24, 2008

If you're looking for an interesting class and a grade booster- DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. He's full of himself. Loves seeing his face on the screen so he'll show unrelated videos of him on the news. He's insensitive. He once asked a girl how her father was killed. Would not recommend ANY of his classes. His teaching is the same in all his classes.

2.0
4.0
SOC271
Mar 10, 2009

He somehow made an interesting subject completely boring. His lectures are irrelevant 90% of the time and the tests are tricky. I liked the books he assigned but that was it

2.0
2.0
SOC222
Mar 13, 2009

I took multiple classes from him, which were some of the easiest ones I took at UW. He's not that clear, but his tests are open book, and the questions are in order of the reading material. You can't make it much easier than that.

1.0
5.0
SOC271
Mar 15, 2009

This is the worst class ever. You would think it'd be interesting but he makes it BORING. His tests are ridiculous. Don't take this class. It will kill your gpa and it will be boring.

2.0
3.0
SOC271
Mar 23, 2009

This course was more complicated than it needed to be. The professor has experience in the area, however, he has an inflated ego and hates hearing alternative opinions. (i.e.: he doesn't believe in mental illnesses or that ADD really exists.) Also, his lectures are completely boring. He drones on about essentially nothing but his own opinions.

5.0
2.0
SOC275
May 8, 2009

This class is fairly easy so don't buy into the other people that say it is hard, they must just not be very intelligent. The lectures are not too interesting. The midterms are split between lectures and the textbook probably 25% to 75%.

1.0
2.0
SOC275
Jun 5, 2009

I took this class - "murder" - intending to learn about a lot of interesting SOCIOLOGICAL concepts, but instead I found myself in a criminal justice class with a professor who would rather talk about irrelevant an uninteresting material that wouldn't be present on the test. He is lacking as an instructor and communicator. Class interest level poor.

1.0
4.0
SOC275
Jun 11, 2009

The man can't get enough of himself. He thinks that he is THE professor of the milenium...and he is so very wrong. He's constantly name dropping (taking partial credit for the accomplishments of others) and is absolutely useless if you have a question. He'll keep looking at his notes and say, "ask the TA's any questions" DON"T TAKE CLASSES WITH HIM

4.0
3.0
SOC275
Sep 16, 2009

If you have a real interest in the topic, it's a cool class. Readings are dry but lectures are interesting--Weiss has lots of inside information and unique insight. I don't know what's with all the haters here--tests were open book! I put in a fairly low amount of effort for a 3.9. And I LOVED that he kicked out people who weren't paying attention!

2.0
5.0
SOC275
Nov 23, 2009

Prof Weiss is a self-absorbed prick. The textbook (which he co-authored, of course) is dense and utterly incomprehensible, and the assigned autobiography is awful. Exams are based purely on your ability to memorize and spit out useless information. This class is actually called "Murder" because you will die of boredom.

5.0
3.0
SOC275
Dec 30, 2009

Most either love or hate him, but I love him because he actually knows what he is talking about and gets the poing across. Those who criticize him as a snob don't understand his humor, and he is obviously laughing at himself during lectures. Overall an interesting and informative class.

3.0
4.0
SOS271
Jan 27, 2010

not as bad as people say, but not great either. boring lecturer, but he knows what he's talking about. tests are quite difficult, take good notes on the readings

2.0
1.0
SOC271
Jan 27, 2010

One of the easiest classes I've ever taken at the U. Yes, his lectures were incredibly boring, but guess what? You don't have to go. As long as you do the readings, pop into section and the review sections, you'll be fine for the tests.

2.0
3.0
SOC271
Mar 17, 2010

Class was so boring, I almost fell asleep. I NEVER sleep in class. Weis managed to cram 30 min of material into 1.5 hours, was very disrespectful of our commitment by letting us out ridiculously early every day instead of teaching us for the amount of time we paid for. Book was full of typos, bad quality. Vague lectures but tested on minute details

2.0
3.0
SOC271
Mar 17, 2010

Oh, also: His powerpoints are ugly, useless, and utterly lacking in professionalism. Wanders around so much in lecture it's impossible to keep your notes organized in a decent outline. AND HE TALKS SO SLOWLY. It's maddening. *talks* *stares at notes for 30 seconds* *talks some more* AAAAGGGHHH

1.0
3.0
SOC271
Apr 1, 2010

The worst professor I have ever had. Listening to him was utterly painful, which is a shame because the content of the course is very interesting but he managed to ruin that.

2.0
3.0
SOC275
Jul 18, 2010

Awful class! It is pretty easy if you read the book he assigns fully, but it is an incredibly boring read! He is totally full of himself and does not seem to care about the students. For one quiz in class the average was about a D out of 600 students! He then blamed the low score on the students study habits rather than his teaching! He is awful!

4.0
4.0
SOC222
Jul 22, 2010

Plain and Simple: If you LOVE sports, specifically baseball, you will like this class. Weis is a former baseball coach, so he goes off on tangents, but they're interesting. this guy is the best, he'll let you out like an hour early in a two hour class, not joking. his tests are a little difficult because he you have to be so specific

2.0
4.0
SOC200S
Sep 21, 2010

I have had him for 3 classes - deviance, sports and murder. You can't know what to expect on the exams since his TAs write them. There is little variance - he hits 1 subject hard and kind of ignores the rest. Very rude and full of himself - just painful to sit through! The classes he does are interesting - just go in knowing that you will hate him!

1.0
5.0
SOC275
Feb 10, 2011

sometimes is sassy when replying to questions. rambles alot. who knows what the test will be on......so unclear on everything.

4.0
2.0
SOC275
Feb 15, 2011

Super Easy... He is funny!!!! You super liberal uptight UW students are too sensitive.

2.0
4.0
SOC275
Mar 3, 2011

Weiss is horribly boring! He goes off on tangents and is rude to the students. BORING CLASS NOT WORTH IT. It's miserable. Tests are open book but the average was 76%. Not recommended. Very full of himself.

5.0
2.0
SOC275
Mar 13, 2011

I really do not understand all of these negative comments about his teaching. It sounds like a whole bunch of whiny high schoolers on this board. You're in college now, don't expect your professor to say "Nice try!" when your answer is completely wrong. He's not condescending at all. I found him very helpful and an overall nice guy.

1.0
4.0
SOC275
Mar 21, 2011

The worst professor at UW. Absurd tests (even though they are open book), SO many typos in the book, someone had a seizure in class and instead of calling 911 he told them they should see a doctor, talks about self and murder statistics the entire time - that is what google is for. Oh, and he decides to not do class evaluations...I wonder why.

1.0
5.0
SOC222
Jun 1, 2011

Lectures are useless, he just talks about baseball and himself. Test questions are based almost entirely on the opinions of various sociologists/sports critics from the textbook, so if you don't memorize the book you'll basically fail the class.

2.0
4.0
SOC275
Mar 21, 2013

interesting class. interesting professor.

3.0
3.0
SOC201
Jun 11, 2013

Not the best professor I've ever had, but far from the worst. He tends to ramble a bit, but he knows his stuff and is interesting to listen to. Open book tests too, easy class.

3.0
3.0
275
Mar 30, 2014

Lectures are painful and dry but he lets you out early every day which is nice. Midterm and final are manageable, put in a good amount of effort and you'll get a 3.5 sadly though the class really isn't as interesting as it sounds.

1.0
3.0
SOC201
Jun 2, 2014

Quiz sections are not designed to teach anything specific and material is completely up to your TA to decide what to teach. Prof. does not use class time well and is very unclear about what he considers important in his teaching. Overall very disappointing course for somebody who went in interested in the class.

2.0
2.0
SOC222
Grade: A
Jun 6, 2014

The course "Sociology of Sport" sounds incredibly interesting but it is NOT. All he does is talk about himself and go off on tangents to try and get laughs from the class. The biggest waste of time ever. He thinks so highly of himself which is obnoxious. His tests are open book though so you're able to get a 4.0 in the class.

1.0
3.0
SOC201
Jun 7, 2014

25% of class was him trying to make the computer work, 25% was him blaring max volume YouTube videos at us, another 25% was his middle-school-level jokes, and the last 25% was rambling stories about meeting D-list celebrities. Hard to know what to study for tests. Could've been an interesting sociological topic (rock music), but he blew it.

4.0
2.0
SOC222
Sep 26, 2014

I had him for the Summer Quarter of Soc 222 and while there was only about 10 of us, he was always really friendly and understanding. He tests you on things he says during his lectures and his tests were open book. As long as you pay attention and try, it's an easy 4.0 class. He's also passionate about what he does too so another +.

3.0
1.0
SOC201
Mar 14, 2015

I took two sociology classes with Joe. He's entertaining during lecture and was one of my favorite professors simply because he's interesting. His lectures don't follow a structure and he goes off on tangents but he is passionate about the topic. All of his exams are open book, so as long as you read the material you will easily pass his classes.

3.0
3.0
SOC275
Grade: Incomplete
May 7, 2015

Obvious he doesn't care about students so unhelpful and directs ALL questions to his TA's. Makes tests open book so he can sell more of his books he wrote ($100+), takes questions directly from sentences in the book. Rants most of the lecture with unhelpful information so read the book which is mostly about statistics and not interesting.

3.0
3.0
SOC275
Grade: A-
Jun 17, 2015

He is entertaining but goes off on tangents during class. Its an 1 hr 50 min class and he lets you out 45 mins early, he could better utilize the time he has. Be prepared to read the entire book. Tests are ok, they are open book, so as long as you have attended lecture and done the reading you should pass.

2.0
4.0
SOC275
Grade: A+
Jun 29, 2015

Joe Weiss is a very monotoned and spends about 2 hours on 3 slides. Not the most entertaining class however it is interesting if you actually pay attention and read the book. Definitely not an easy 4.0 class- you have to work hard for a good grade!! Stay on task, do NOT skip class, and READ the book (even though it's boring) and you'll be fine!

Class Info

Attendance Mandatory

100%

Textbook Required

100%

Grade Predictor

Your expected effort level

LowHigh

Predicted Grade

A-

74% confidence
Based on 8 grades
Most common grades:
A (4)
A+ (2)
B (1)
Grade Distribution
A(6)B(1)C(0)D(0)F(0)A-/B+(1)
Based on 9 reported grades
A: 4
A+: 2
B: 1
Incomplete: 1
Rating Trend

Improving

+0.74 avg change
Mar
Jun
Sep
Mar
May
Jun
Last 6 months
Ratings by Course

SOC

5.0

(1)

SOC271S

4.0

(1)

SOCIOLOGY

4.0

(1)

MURDERSOC275

4.0

(1)

275

3.0

(1)
+17 more courses
Difficulty by Course

SPORTDELINQUEN

5.0

21063SOCOF

4.0

SOCIOLOGY275

4.0

SOS271

4.0

SOC200S

4.0

Similar Professors